pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07683 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Dust Absorption towards Supernova Remnant W44

Tian-Yu Tu , Adwin Boogert , Yang Chen , Wenlang He
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords supernova remnantsinterstellar icemolecular cloudswater ice absorptioncosmic raysinfrared spectroscopyaliphatic hydrocarbonsW44
0
0 comments X

The pith

Water ice abundances are 1.5 to 3 times lower in the molecular cloud interacting with supernova remnant W44 than in similar nearby clouds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses 2-5 micron spectroscopy of background stars to measure ice and dust absorption along sightlines through a giant molecular cloud that is physically interacting with SNR W44. It finds clear detections of water ice and aliphatic hydrocarbons, with probable carbon monoxide ice in one case, while millimeter CO maps and 3D extinction data confirm that the W44-associated gas supplies most of the total extinction. The water ice columns fall well below the values measured in unaffected molecular clouds at the same extinction level, and the CO ice to water ice ratio is also unusually low. These differences point to processing of the ices by the shocks and cosmic rays supplied by the remnant itself.

Core claim

Medium-resolution infrared spectra show H2O ice absorption at 3.0 microns and aliphatic hydrocarbon absorption at 3.4 microns toward two stars, with probable CO ice at 4.67 microns toward one. Millimeter CO J=1-0 emission and three-dimensional dust maps establish that the dense gas tied to W44 accounts for more than 60 percent of the total extinction (A_K approximately 2.6) along these lines of sight. The derived H2O ice column densities are a factor of 1.5-3 lower than those found in nearby molecular clouds at comparable extinctions, and the CO ice abundance relative to H2O is less than 12 percent. One sightline also exhibits an unusually strong 3.4 micron feature whose carriers may be tied

What carries the argument

Infrared absorption spectroscopy of background stars combined with millimeter CO mapping and 3D dust extinction models to isolate the contribution of the W44-interacting cloud.

If this is right

  • Shocks and cosmic rays from the supernova remnant destroy water and CO ice mantles in the interacting cloud.
  • The low CO ice to water ice ratio is a direct consequence of this selective destruction.
  • Aliphatic hydrocarbon carriers may be enhanced either in the diffuse gas or within the processed molecular material near W44.
  • The overall dust and ice composition along these sightlines is altered by the SNR interaction.
  • Similar ice depletion should appear in other supernova remnant-molecular cloud contact regions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Models of interstellar ice chemistry must incorporate localized destruction zones around supernova remnants when predicting molecular abundances available for star formation.
  • The unusually strong 3.4 micron feature could be tested with higher-resolution spectra to decide whether it traces diffuse-cloud carriers or material processed inside the SNR environment.
  • Extending the same observing strategy to other well-studied SNR-cloud systems would show whether the factor of 1.5-3 reduction is typical or depends on remnant age and shock strength.

Load-bearing premise

The measured absorption features arise primarily in the molecular cloud that is interacting with W44 rather than in unrelated foreground or background material, and the comparison clouds are similar enough in every other respect that the abundance difference can be attributed to W44.

What would settle it

Ice column density measurements toward stars behind the same molecular cloud but offset from W44's influence that recover the higher abundances typical of unaffected clouds would show the reduction is not caused by the remnant.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07683 by Adwin Boogert, Tian-Yu Tu, Wenlang He, Yang Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Integrated intensity map of FUGIN 13CO 1–0 line in +39–+47 km s−1 covering the majority of the molec￾ular emission associated with W44 (Cosentino et al. 2019). The white crosses mark the positions of the target stars, while the orange and dark orange contours show the SMGPS 1.3 GHz radio continuum of W44 in 2 and 8 mJy beam−1 , respectively. tion mode of SpeX results in a wavelength coverage of 1.98–5.3 µm… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Observed spectra of the target stars (grey lines), as well as WISE and 2MASS photometry (open blue circles, J, H, Ks, W1, and W2 from short to long wavelengths). The best-fit reddened photospheric model spectra are presented in thin red lines, and the modeled J, H, Ks, and W1 photometry is shown in open green boxes. A zoom-in plot showing the CO first overtone is inserted in each panel. 200 and WISE2) phot… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Optical depth spectra of H2O ice towards star 2 (left panel) and star 4 (right panel) shown in grey lines. The thick black lines show the best-fit H2O ice absorption profiles obtained from Hudgins et al. (1993). The dashed black lines are the fitted local baselines for the 3.4 µm absorption feature described in Section 3.2. 4.55 4.60 4.65 4.70 4.75 4.80 4.85 Wavelength ( m) 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 R: 6 5 4 3 2… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: M-band Optical depth spectra towards star 2 (left panel) and star 4 (right panel) shown in thick grey lines. The dashed magenta lines show the best-fit CO ice absorption profiles using the Gaussian component of Pontoppidan et al. (2003). CO ice is likely only detected towards star 2. The possible detection of the gas phase 12CO and 13CO absorption lines are marked with dotted lines. 349 where τ3.0 is the p… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: 12CO 1–0 (grey) and 13CO (light blue) 1–0 emis￾sion lines spectra towards stars 2 and 4 obtained from the FUGIN project (Umemoto et al. 2017). The spectra towards star 4 are offset by 15 K. The black and blue lines show the results of Gaussian fitting to the two lines, respectively. from the center of the 12CO 1–0 line, suggesting that the 13CO line is only consistent with one component of the 12CO line. T… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Correlation plots of AK with column densities of H2O (left panel) and CO (right panel) ices. The data obtained towards stars 2 and 4 are shown in red triangles and circles, respectively (note that the obtained column densities of the CO ice should be regarded as upper limits; Section 3.2), while the orange triangles and circles are those where the AK from diffuse gas is subtracted. The other data points ar… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Optical depth of the aliphatic hydrocarbon absorption at 3.4 µm (τ3.4) against the visual extinction (AV ). The black data points are taken from previous ob￾servations (McFadzean et al. 1989; Adamson et al. 1990; Sandford et al. 1991; Pendleton et al. 1994; Chiar et al. 2000; Chiar & Tielens 2001; Chiar et al. 2002; Rawlings et al. 2003; Dartois et al. 2004) which were in turn compiled by Godard et al. (20… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Supernova remnants (SNRs) can strongly affect the chemical composition of the interstellar dust. In this paper we investigate to what degree the dust and ices are modified by observing four stars expected to be absorbed by a giant molecular cloud interacting with SNR W44, using medium-resolution spectroscopy in 2-5 $\mu$m. Absorption from H2O ice around 3.0 $\mu$m and aliphatic hydrocarbon dust around 3.4 $\mu$m were detected towards two stars, while probable CO ice at 4.67 $\mu$m towards one of them. Millimeter gas-phase CO J = 1-0 lines and three-dimensional dust extinction maps show that the dense molecular gas associated with W44 dominates (> 60%) the total interstellar extinction (A_K ~ 2.6) along these two sightlines. The H2O ice column densities are a factor of 1.5-3 lower than nearby MCs at similar extinctions, possibly because of the destruction of ice by shocks and cosmic rays (CRs) from W44, consistent with the low CO ice abundance relative to H2O (< 12%). One of the sightlines shows an unusually strong 3.4 $\mu$m aliphatic hydrocarbon absorption. If the carriers are located in diffuse dust along the sightline, unrelated to W44, its strength is ~ 4 times larger than those typically observed for diffuse dust clouds. Alternatively, the carriers may be enhanced in the W44 environment. We discuss several possible explanations, including shock formation of aliphatic hydrocarbons in diffuse clouds associated with W44, contribution from aliphatic hydrocarbons in shocked and CR-bombarded molecular clouds, and changes in the extinction law due to the SNR interaction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents medium-resolution 2-5 μm spectroscopy toward four stars behind a giant molecular cloud interacting with SNR W44. Absorption from H2O ice (3.0 μm) and aliphatic hydrocarbons (3.4 μm) is detected toward two sightlines, with probable CO ice (4.67 μm) toward one. Millimeter CO J=1-0 and 3D extinction maps indicate that dense gas associated with W44 dominates >60% of the total A_K ≈ 2.6 along these lines of sight. The derived H2O ice column densities are 1.5-3 times lower than in nearby molecular clouds at comparable extinctions; this is interpreted as evidence for ice destruction by shocks and cosmic rays from W44, consistent with a low CO ice abundance relative to H2O (<12%). One sightline shows an unusually strong 3.4 μm feature whose origin (diffuse dust or W44-processed material) is discussed.

Significance. If the attribution of the ice features to the W44-interacting cloud is robust and the comparison sample is appropriately matched, the results would provide direct observational evidence for SNR-driven processing of interstellar ices, with implications for dust evolution and astrochemistry in supernova environments. The multi-wavelength approach combining IR spectroscopy, mm gas tracers, and 3D extinction maps is a positive aspect of the work.

major comments (3)
  1. [Extinction analysis (mm CO J=1-0 and 3D dust maps)] The claim that dense molecular gas associated with W44 dominates >60% of the total extinction (A_K ~2.6) does not isolate the ice-bearing component. Foreground diffuse material or unrelated dense clumps could contribute to the observed H2O and CO ice absorption without having experienced W44 shocks/CRs. This attribution is load-bearing for the destruction interpretation but is not demonstrated by the mm CO J=1-0 and 3D map data alone.
  2. [Comparison with other molecular clouds] The factor of 1.5-3 lower H2O ice column densities relative to nearby MCs at similar extinctions requires explicit matching criteria for the comparison sample (volume density, kinetic temperature, local radiation field, and metallicity). Without these, the deficit cannot be unambiguously assigned to W44 processing rather than differing initial conditions.
  3. [CO ice detection and abundance] The CO ice abundance upper limit (<12% relative to H2O) is presented without the underlying column-density values, detection limits, or error analysis for the 4.67 μm feature. This weakens the consistency argument with the H2O deficit.
minor comments (3)
  1. The manuscript should include a table of observed column densities with uncertainties and a summary of the four sightlines (coordinates, A_K values, and which features are detected).
  2. Error bars or confidence intervals are not visible on the reported ice column densities or the 1.5-3 factor; these should be added to all quantitative claims.
  3. The discussion of the strong 3.4 μm aliphatic feature would benefit from additional references to literature values in both diffuse and dense environments for context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The claim that dense molecular gas associated with W44 dominates >60% of the total extinction (A_K ~2.6) does not isolate the ice-bearing component. Foreground diffuse material or unrelated dense clumps could contribute to the observed H2O and CO ice absorption without having experienced W44 shocks/CRs. This attribution is load-bearing for the destruction interpretation but is not demonstrated by the mm CO J=1-0 and 3D map data alone.

    Authors: We agree this attribution is critical. The 3D extinction maps place the bulk of A_K at the distance of W44, and the mm CO J=1-0 spectra show emission at velocities matching the known W44-molecular cloud interaction. The two sightlines with ice detections were specifically chosen to intersect the interacting region. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that velocity information alone does not fully exclude unrelated dense clumps at similar distance. In revision we will expand the discussion to include the spatial correlation with W44's radio shell and the absence of ice features toward the two control sightlines with lower W44-associated extinction, thereby strengthening the case that the observed ices are dominated by the processed material. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The factor of 1.5-3 lower H2O ice column densities relative to nearby MCs at similar extinctions requires explicit matching criteria for the comparison sample (volume density, kinetic temperature, local radiation field, and metallicity). Without these, the deficit cannot be unambiguously assigned to W44 processing rather than differing initial conditions.

    Authors: We selected the comparison sample (primarily Taurus, Perseus, and IC 5146) on the basis of comparable total A_K and similar Galactic radii to control for metallicity and average radiation field. Direct volume-density and kinetic-temperature measurements are not uniformly available for every reference cloud in the literature. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit table listing the adopted A_K, approximate n(H2), and T_kin ranges for each comparison cloud, together with a short discussion of the remaining uncertainties. We maintain that the observed deficit remains noteworthy given the unique presence of SNR-driven shocks and enhanced CR flux at W44, but we will present the comparison more cautiously. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The CO ice abundance upper limit (<12% relative to H2O) is presented without the underlying column-density values, detection limits, or error analysis for the 4.67 μm feature. This weakens the consistency argument with the H2O deficit.

    Authors: We regret the omission. The 4.67 μm feature is only marginally detected toward one star; the <12% upper limit was obtained from the 3σ noise level in the continuum-subtracted spectrum assuming a typical CO ice band strength. In the revision we will insert the measured (or limiting) optical depth, the adopted band strength, the resulting N(CO) value with uncertainty, and the explicit calculation of the N(CO)/N(H2O) ratio. This will make the consistency argument with the H2O-ice deficit fully traceable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely observational with external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper reports direct spectroscopic measurements of H2O ice, CO ice, and aliphatic hydrocarbon absorption features toward background stars, combined with independent mm-wave CO J=1-0 data and 3D extinction maps to attribute >60% of A_K to the W44-interacting cloud. Column densities are extracted from observed spectra and compared to literature values for other molecular clouds at comparable extinctions; no equations, fitted parameters, or derivations are defined in terms of the target results. The interpretive suggestion of ice destruction by W44 shocks/CRs is an inference from the data, not a self-referential loop or self-citation load-bearing step. All load-bearing elements rest on external observations and literature comparisons.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two domain assumptions about the location of the absorbing material and the validity of external comparisons; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The dense molecular gas associated with W44 dominates (>60%) the total interstellar extinction along the observed sightlines
    Invoked to attribute the observed ice features and their abundances to the W44 environment rather than unrelated material.
  • domain assumption Nearby molecular clouds used for comparison have similar properties except for the absence of W44 shocks and cosmic rays
    Required to interpret the factor of 1.5-3 lower H2O ice column densities as a consequence of W44 processing.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5620 in / 1429 out tokens · 46964 ms · 2026-05-10T18:17:54.650418+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2013, Science, 339, 807, doi: 10.1126/science.1231160

    Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., Allafort, A., et al. 2013, Science, 339, 807, doi: 10.1126/science.1231160

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1231160 2013

  2. [2]

    J., Whittet, D

    Adamson, A. J., Whittet, D. C. B., & Duley, W. W. 1990, MNRAS, 243, 400

    1990

  3. [3]

    Aharonian, F. A. 2013, APh, 43, 71, doi: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.08.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.08.007 2013

  4. [4]

    2014, A&A, 569, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423561

    Anderl, S., Gusdorf, A., & G¨ usten, R. 2014, A&A, 569, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423561

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423561 2014

  5. [5]

    R., Garrod , R

    Arumainayagam, C. R., Garrod, R. T., Boyer, M. C., et al. 2019, ChSRv, 48, 2293, doi: 10.1039/C7CS00443E Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    work page doi:10.1039/c7cs00443e 2019

  6. [6]

    2012, A&A, 541, L12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219207

    Ceccarelli, C. 2012, A&A, 541, L12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219207

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219207 2012

  7. [7]

    Barlow, M. J. 1978, MNRAS, 183, 367, doi: 10.1093/mnras/183.3.367

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/183.3.367 1978

  8. [8]

    A., Melnick, G

    Bergin, E. A., Melnick, G. J., & Neufeld, D. A. 1998, ApJ, 499, 777, doi: 10.1086/305656

    work page doi:10.1086/305656 1998

  9. [9]

    A., Neufeld, D

    Bergin, E. A., Neufeld, D. A., & Melnick, G. J. 1999, ApJ, 510, L145, doi: 10.1086/311817

    work page doi:10.1086/311817 1999

  10. [10]

    C., Savage, B

    Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., & Drake, J. F. 1978, ApJ, 224, 132, doi: 10.1086/156357

    work page doi:10.1086/156357 1978

  11. [11]

    and Wolfire, Mark and Leroy, Adam K

    Bolatto, A. D., Wolfire, M., & Leroy, A. K. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 207, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944

    work page Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944 2013

  12. [12]

    Boogert, A. C. A., Chiar, J. E., Knez, C., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 73, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/73

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/777/1/73 2013

  13. [13]

    Boogert, A. C. A., Gerakines, P. A., & Whittet, D. C. B. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 541, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122348

    work page Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122348 2015

  14. [14]

    Boogert, A. C. A., Huard, T. L., Cook, A. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 729, 92, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/729/2/92

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/729/2/92 2011

  15. [15]

    L., Goss, W

    Brogan, C. L., Goss, W. M., Hunter, T. R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 771, 91, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/771/2/91

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/771/2/91 2013

  16. [16]

    Y., Sellgren, K., & Geballe, T

    Brooke, T. Y., Sellgren, K., & Geballe, T. R. 1999, ApJ, 517, 883, doi: 10.1086/307237

    work page doi:10.1086/307237 1999

  17. [17]

    M., Shingledecker, C

    Burkhardt, A. M., Shingledecker, C. N., Le Gal, R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 881, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2be8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2be8 2019

  18. [18]

    2014, A&A, 565, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322685

    Cardillo, M., Tavani, M., Giuliani, A., et al. 2014, A&A, 565, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322685

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322685 2014

  19. [19]

    2012, , 20, 56, 10.1007/s00159-012-0056-x

    Caselli, P., & Ceccarelli, C. 2012, A&ARv, 20, 56, doi: 10.1007/s00159-012-0056-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-012-0056-x 2012

  20. [20]

    W., & Havnes, O

    Caselli, P., Hartquist, T. W., & Havnes, O. 1997, A&A, 322, 296

    1997

  21. [21]

    E., Adamson, A

    Chiar, J. E., Adamson, A. J., Kerr, T. H., & Whittet, D. C. B. 1994, ApJ, 426, 240, doi: 10.1086/174058 —. 1995, ApJ, 455, 234, doi: 10.1086/176571

    work page doi:10.1086/174058 1994

  22. [22]

    E., Adamson, A

    Chiar, J. E., Adamson, A. J., Pendleton, Y. J., et al. 2002, ApJ, 570, 198, doi: 10.1086/339570

    work page doi:10.1086/339570 2002

  23. [23]

    E., Adamson, A

    Chiar, J. E., Adamson, A. J., & Whittet, D. C. B. 1996, ApJ, 472, 665, doi: 10.1086/178097

    work page doi:10.1086/178097 1996

  24. [24]

    E., & Tielens, A

    Chiar, J. E., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2001, ApJ, 550, L207, doi: 10.1086/319631

    work page doi:10.1086/319631 2001

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    Ricca, A. 2013, ApJ, 770, 78, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/78

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/78 2013

  26. [26]

    E., Tielens, A

    Chiar, J. E., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Whittet, D. C. B., et al. 2000, ApJ, 537, 749, doi: 10.1086/309047

    work page doi:10.1086/309047 2000

  27. [27]

    E., Pendleton, Y

    Chiar, J. E., Pendleton, Y. J., Allamandola, L. J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 731, 9, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/731/1/9

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/731/1/9 2011

  28. [28]

    Chu, L. E. U., Hodapp, K., & Boogert, A. 2020, ApJ, 904, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbfa5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbfa5 2020

  29. [29]

    J., Frail, D

    Claussen, M. J., Frail, D. A., Goss, W. M., & Gaume, R. A. 1997, ApJ, 489, 143, doi: 10.1086/304784

    work page doi:10.1086/304784 1997

  30. [30]

    2015, MNRAS, 449, L11, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slu204 13

    Codella, C., Fontani, F., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, L11, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slu204 13

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slu204 2015

  31. [31]

    D., et al

    Cosentino, G., Jim´ enez-Serra, I., Henshaw, J. D., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 3760, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3013

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3013 2018

  32. [32]

    2019, ApJ, 881, L42, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab38c5

    Cosentino, G., Jim´ enez-Serra, I., Caselli, P., et al. 2019, ApJ, 881, L42, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab38c5

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab38c5 2019

  33. [33]

    C., et al

    Cosentino, G., Jim´ enez-Serra, I., Tan, J. C., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 953, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac070

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac070 2022

  34. [34]

    C., Vacca, W

    Cushing, M. C., Vacca, W. D., & Rayner, J. T. 2004, PASP, 116, 362, doi: 10.1086/382907

    work page doi:10.1086/382907 2004

  35. [35]

    2018, A&A, 618, A173, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833277

    Dartois, E., Chabot, M., Id Barkach, T., et al. 2018, A&A, 618, A173, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833277

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833277 2018

  36. [36]

    2001, A&A, 365, 144, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000174

    Dartois, E., & d’Hendecourt, L. 2001, A&A, 365, 144, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000174

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000174 2001

  37. [37]

    M., & van Dishoeck, E

    Dartois, E., d’Hendecourt, L., Thi, W., Pontoppidan, K. M., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2002, A&A, 394, 1057, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021228

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021228 2002

  38. [38]

    M., Deboffle, D., & d’Hendecourt, L

    Dartois, E., Mu˜ noz Caro, G. M., Deboffle, D., & d’Hendecourt, L. 2004, A&A, 423, L33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200400032

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200400032 2004

  39. [39]

    Draine, B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    2011

  40. [40]

    T., & McKee, C

    Draine, B. T., & McKee, C. F. 1993, ARA&A, 31, 373, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002105

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002105 1993

  41. [41]

    T., Roberge, W

    Draine, B. T., Roberge, W. G., & Dalgarno, A. 1983, ApJ, 264, 485, doi: 10.1086/160617

    work page doi:10.1086/160617 1983

  42. [42]

    2014, ApJ, 786, L24, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/786/2/L24

    Dumas, G., Vaupr´ e, S., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2014, ApJ, 786, L24, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/786/2/L24

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/786/2/l24 2014

  43. [43]

    A., Langer, W

    Frerking, M. A., Langer, W. D., & Wilson, R. W. 1982, ApJ, 262, 590, doi: 10.1086/160451

    work page doi:10.1086/160451 1982

  44. [44]

    W., & Li, A

    Gao, J., Jiang, B. W., & Li, A. 2010, EP&S, 62, 63, doi: 10.5047/eps.2008.12.006

    work page doi:10.5047/eps.2008.12.006 2010

  45. [45]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065560 , eprint =

    Garrod, R. T., & Herbst, E. 2006, A&A, 457, 927, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065560

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065560 2006

  46. [46]

    Dishoeck, E. F. 1995, A&A, 296, 810, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9409076

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9409076 1995

  47. [47]

    R., Dartois, E., & Mu˜ noz Caro, G

    Godard, M., Geballe, T. R., Dartois, E., & Mu˜ noz Caro, G. M. 2012, A&A, 537, A27, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117197

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117197 2012

  48. [48]

    2011, A&A, 529, A146, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016228

    Godard, M., F´ eraud, G., Chabot, M., et al. 2011, A&A, 529, A146, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016228

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016228 2011

  49. [49]

    D., Camilo, F., et al

    Goedhart, S., Cotton, W. D., Camilo, F., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 649, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1166

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1166 2024

  50. [50]

    D., Hocuk, S., et al

    Goto, M., Bailey, J. D., Hocuk, S., et al. 2018, A&A, 610, A9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629830

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629830 2018

  51. [51]

    I., Giuliano, B

    Goto, M., Vasyunin, A. I., Giuliano, B. M., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936385

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936385 2021

  52. [52]

    2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 887, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362

    Finkbeiner, D. 2019, ApJ, 887, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362 2019

  53. [53]

    P., & Pineau Des Forˆ ets, G

    Guillet, V., Jones, A. P., & Pineau Des Forˆ ets, G. 2009, A&A, 497, 145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811115

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200811115 2009

  54. [54]

    Guillet, V., Pineau Des Forˆ ets, G., & Jones, A. P. 2011, A&A, 527, A123, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015973 G¨ unay, B., Burton, M. G., Afs,ar, M., & Schmidt, T. W. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 4201, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1482

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015973 2011

  55. [55]

    I., & Herbst, E

    Hasegawa, T. I., & Herbst, E. 1993, MNRAS, 261, 83, doi: 10.1093/mnras/261.1.83

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/261.1.83 1993

  56. [56]

    S., & Draine, B

    Hensley, B. S., & Draine, B. T. 2020, ApJ, 895, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8cc3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8cc3 2020

  57. [57]

    M., Goss, W

    Hoffman, I. M., Goss, W. M., Brogan, C. L., & Claussen, M. J. 2005, ApJ, 627, 803, doi: 10.1086/430419

    work page doi:10.1086/430419 2005

  58. [58]

    S., & Naab, T

    Hu, C.-Y., Zhukovska, S., Somerville, R. S., & Naab, T. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 3252, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1481

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1481 2019

  59. [59]

    Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1993, ApJS, 86, 713, doi: 10.1086/191796

    work page doi:10.1086/191796 1993

  60. [60]

    S., Babler, B

    Indebetouw, R., Mathis, J. S., Babler, B. L., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, 931, doi: 10.1086/426679

    work page doi:10.1086/426679 2005

  61. [61]

    Ishii, M., Nagata, T., Chrysostomou, A., & Hough, J. H. 2002, AJ, 124, 2790, doi: 10.1086/344070

    work page doi:10.1086/344070 2002

  62. [62]

    V., R¨ ocker, T

    Ivlev, A. V., R¨ ocker, T. B., Vasyunin, A., & Caselli, P. 2015, ApJ, 805, 59, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/59

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/1/59 2015

  63. [63]

    2022, ApJ, 930, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5d51 Jim´ enez-Serra, I., Caselli, P., Mart´ ın-Pintado, J., &

    Jang, D., An, D., Sellgren, K., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5d51 Jim´ enez-Serra, I., Caselli, P., Mart´ ın-Pintado, J., &

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5d51 2022

  64. [64]

    Hartquist, T. W. 2008, A&A, 482, 549, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078054

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078054 2008

  65. [65]

    P., Tielens, A

    Jones, A. P., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Hollenbach, D. J. 1996, ApJ, 469, 740, doi: 10.1086/177823

    work page doi:10.1086/177823 1996

  66. [66]

    2020, ApJ, 160, 263, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abc00e

    Lee, Y.-H., Koo, B.-C., & Lee, J.-J. 2020, ApJ, 160, 263, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abc00e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abc00e 2020

  67. [67]

    , keywords =

    Lee, Y.-H., Koo, B.-C., Lee, J.-J., Burton, M. G., & Ryder, S. 2019, ApJ, 157, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab0212

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab0212 2019

  68. [68]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 1056, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2475

    Lo, J.-I., Lu, H.-C., Peng, Y.-C., Chou, S.-L., & Cheng, B.-M. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 1056, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2475

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2475 2021

  69. [69]

    Madden, M. C. L., Boogert, A. C. A., Chiar, J. E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac617d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac617d 2022

  70. [70]

    , keywords =

    Mangum, J. G., & Shirley, Y. L. 2015, PASA, 127, 266, doi: 10.1086/680323 Mat´ e, B., Molpeceres, G., Jim´ enez-Redondo, M., Tanarro, I., & Herrero, V. J. 2016, ApJ, 831, 51, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/51

    work page doi:10.1086/680323 2015

  71. [71]

    I., de Wilt, P., Rowell, G

    Maxted, N. I., de Wilt, P., Rowell, G. P., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 532, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1687

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1687 2016

  72. [72]

    N., Wyrowski, F., Menten, K

    Mazumdar, P., Tram, L. N., Wyrowski, F., Menten, K. M., & Tang, X. 2022, A&A, 668, A180, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037564 14

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037564 2022

  73. [73]

    K., Rocha, W

    McClure, M. K., Rocha, W. R. M., Pontoppidan, K. M., et al. 2023, NatAs, 7, 431, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01875-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01875-w 2023

  74. [74]

    C., Pihlstr¨ om, Y

    McEwen, B. C., Pihlstr¨ om, Y. M., & Sjouwerman, L. O. 2016, ApJ, 826, 189, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/189

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/189 2016

  75. [75]

    F., & Adamson, A

    Bode, M. F., & Adamson, A. J. 1989, MNRAS, 241, 873, doi: 10.1093/mnras/241.14.873

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/241.14.873 1989

  76. [76]

    2006, ApJ, 647, L49, doi: 10.1086/507296

    Mennella, V. 2006, ApJ, 647, L49, doi: 10.1086/507296

    work page doi:10.1086/507296 2006

  77. [77]

    R., Jones, A

    Micelotta, E. R., Jones, A. P., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2010, A&A, 510, A36, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911682

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200911682 2010

  78. [78]

    C., Trotta , R., Berkes , P., Starkman , G

    Nicholas, B. P., Rowell, G., Burton, M. G., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 251, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19688.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19688.x 2012

  79. [79]

    K., Nobukawa, M., Koyama, K., et al

    Nobukawa, K. K., Nobukawa, M., Koyama, K., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa8dc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa8dc 2018

  80. [80]

    R., Goto, M., et al

    Oka, T., Geballe, T. R., Goto, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3647

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3647 2019

Showing first 80 references.