pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07899 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

A Game-Theoretic Decentralized Real-Time Control of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations - Part I: Incentive Design

Riccardo Ramaschi , Mario Paolone , Sonia Leva This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords Electric vehiclesCharging stationsDecentralized controlStackelberg gameIncentive mechanismADMMEnergy management systemReal-time optimization
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Stackelberg Game-based ADMM designs incentives while enabling distributed real-time control of EV charging stations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to establish that a decentralized approach to real-time EV charging control can succeed by incorporating an incentive design mechanism based on game theory. Large charging stations cannot be centrally dispatched in real time due to scale, and without incentives EVs may pursue their own goals instead of the system's optimum. By framing the charging station as a leader in a Stackelberg game and using SG-ADMM, the method simultaneously creates incentives and solves the control problem in a distributed fashion. This integrates into a three-layer EMS with centralized planning layers and decentralized real-time layer. Readers care because it offers a path to scalable, incentive-aligned operation for growing EV fleets.

Core claim

The authors propose framing the relationship between the EV charging station and individual EVs as a non-cooperative Stackelberg game in which the station, as leader with commitment power, designs incentives that guide the EVs' responses. They combine this with the alternating direction method of multipliers to create the SG-ADMM algorithm, which handles both incentive design and distributed optimization for real-time control. This decentralized game-theoretic method serves as the real-time layer within a hierarchical energy management system that uses centralized methods for longer-term dispatch planning and intra-day refinement.

What carries the argument

The SG-ADMM algorithm, which merges Stackelberg game theory for incentive design with ADMM for distributed optimization to align the charging station's leadership with EV followers.

If this is right

  • Incentives can be designed on the fly to achieve system-wide optimum in real time.
  • The control remains distributed, preserving privacy and reducing central computation.
  • The approach fits within existing multi-layer EMS structures for planning and refinement.
  • Non-cooperative game modeling allows the leader to exert commitment power to influence outcomes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This framework could extend to other distributed resources in smart grids where incentives align individual and collective goals.
  • Testing against varied EV owner behavior models might reveal robustness or need for adaptive incentives.
  • Integration with renewable energy sources could further optimize charging to match variable generation.
  • Scalability to thousands of EVs might hinge on the convergence speed of the distributed algorithm.

Load-bearing premise

EV owners make charging decisions according to the modeled non-cooperative game responses to the incentives set by the charging station leader.

What would settle it

A simulation or field test in which EV owners' actual charging adjustments deviate significantly from the predicted Stackelberg equilibrium responses, preventing convergence to the desired system optimum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07899 by Mario Paolone, Riccardo Ramaschi, Sonia Leva.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: SG-ADMM algorithm proposed in [30] (in blue the ADMM inner loop, in red the SG outer loop). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Proposed framework for the optimal EMS of a CS. A three-layer EMS is proposed, where only the last layer, the Real-time SG-based ADMM is the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Outer loop based on the bisection method: the first iteration (green) either defines the quadrant or keep zero the slack, the second iteration (yellow) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Large-scale Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Station (CS) may be too large to be dispatched in real-time via a centralized approach. While a decentralized approach may be a viable solution, the lack of incentives could impair the alignment of EVs' individual objectives with the controller's optimum. In this work, we integrate a decentralized algorithm into a hierarchical three-layer Energy Management System (EMS), where it operates as the real-time control layer and incorporates an incentive design mechanism. A centralized approach is proposed for the dispatch plan definition and for the intra-day refinement, while a decentralized game-theoretic approach is proposed for the real time control. We employ a Stackelberg Game-based Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (SG-ADMM) to simultaneously design an incentive mechanism while managing the EV control in a distributed manner, while framing the leadership-followership relation between the EVCS and the EVs as a non-cooperative game where the leader has commitment power. Part I of this two-part paper deals with the SG-ADMM approach description, literature review and integration in the abovementioned hierarchical EMS, focusing on the modifications needed for the proposed application.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper describes the integration of a Stackelberg Game-based Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (SG-ADMM) into a hierarchical three-layer Energy Management System for decentralized real-time control of EV charging stations. It proposes using this approach to design incentives that align EV owners' charging decisions with the system's optimal dispatch in a distributed manner, with the EVCS acting as the leader in a non-cooperative game. Part I focuses on the method description, literature review, and EMS integration details, including necessary modifications for the application.

Significance. If the SG-ADMM method is shown to converge to the Stackelberg equilibrium and effectively design incentives, this work could significantly advance decentralized control strategies for large-scale EV integration into the grid, offering a scalable alternative to centralized approaches. The hierarchical EMS structure provides a clear framework for multi-layer optimization. The paper's strength lies in combining game-theoretic incentive design with distributed optimization, which addresses both economic and operational aspects of EV charging.

major comments (2)
  1. [SG-ADMM approach description] The central claim that SG-ADMM simultaneously designs the incentive mechanism and manages EV control in a distributed manner rests on the assumption that EVs are rational utility maximizers who execute exact best responses to the leader's incentives. However, the manuscript does not provide a formal analysis or conditions under which this holds, nor does it address potential deviations such as bounded rationality or incomplete information, which could prevent convergence to the claimed system optimum.
  2. [Integration in the hierarchical EMS] The modifications needed for the proposed application to the standard ADMM and Stackelberg game concepts are mentioned but not detailed with equations or algorithmic steps in the description. This makes it difficult to verify how the leadership-followership relation is incorporated into the distributed algorithm without reducing to a centralized solution.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract could more clearly distinguish the contributions of Part I from the expected results in Part II, particularly regarding validation of the SG-ADMM.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate the referee's recognition of the potential significance of SG-ADMM for decentralized EV charging control. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity and completeness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [SG-ADMM approach description] The central claim that SG-ADMM simultaneously designs the incentive mechanism and manages EV control in a distributed manner rests on the assumption that EVs are rational utility maximizers who execute exact best responses to the leader's incentives. However, the manuscript does not provide a formal analysis or conditions under which this holds, nor does it address potential deviations such as bounded rationality or incomplete information, which could prevent convergence to the claimed system optimum.

    Authors: We agree that the rationality assumption is foundational to the Stackelberg game model in SG-ADMM and that the current Part I manuscript (focused on approach description, literature review, and EMS integration) does not include a dedicated formal analysis of convergence conditions or robustness to deviations such as bounded rationality or incomplete information. As this is Part I, we will add a new subsection in the revised version explicitly stating the rationality assumption, referencing standard conditions from the game-theoretic literature under which best responses lead to the Stackelberg equilibrium, and discussing limitations regarding deviations. Full convergence proofs and sensitivity analysis to non-rational behavior will be provided in Part II alongside numerical validation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Integration in the hierarchical EMS] The modifications needed for the proposed application to the standard ADMM and Stackelberg game concepts are mentioned but not detailed with equations or algorithmic steps in the description. This makes it difficult to verify how the leadership-followership relation is incorporated into the distributed algorithm without reducing to a centralized solution.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the modifications to standard ADMM and Stackelberg concepts, while referenced in the abstract and introduction as a focus of Part I, lack sufficient explicit equations and step-by-step algorithmic details in the main text. In the revised manuscript, we will expand Section III (or add a dedicated subsection) with the precise update rules for the incentive signals, the modified ADMM iterations that embed the leader's commitment power, and the distributed information exchange protocol. This will clearly demonstrate how the leadership-followership structure is maintained in a decentralized manner without collapsing into a centralized optimization. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation builds on standard ADMM and Stackelberg concepts without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper proposes SG-ADMM as an integration of known alternating direction method of multipliers with Stackelberg game framing for incentive design in a hierarchical EMS. The abstract and description present this as a methodological combination with modifications for real-time EV control, without any self-definitional equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that collapse the central claim. The leadership-followership model and convergence claims rest on standard non-cooperative game assumptions applied to the domain, but the derivation chain itself does not reduce by construction to its own inputs or prior author results. This is a normal non-circular proposal of an algorithmic integration.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides insufficient detail to enumerate specific free parameters or invented entities; relies on standard assumptions of game-theoretic models and optimization convergence.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption EVs act as rational, self-interested players who respond optimally to incentives in a non-cooperative Stackelberg game
    Invoked when framing the EVCS-EV relationship as a leader-follower game with commitment power.
  • domain assumption The SG-ADMM algorithm converges to the desired equilibrium under the proposed modifications for the EMS application
    Assumed for the real-time control layer to function as described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5507 in / 1311 out tokens · 50946 ms · 2026-05-10T18:27:52.263864+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Global EV Outlook 2024,

    IEA, “Global EV Outlook 2024,” IEA, Tech. Rep., 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    [On- line]

    European Environment Agency, accessed on December 2024. [On- line]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/new- registrations-of-electric-vehicles

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    [Online]

    European Alternative Fuels Observatory, accessed on December 2024. [Online]. Available: https://alternative- fuels-observatory.ec.europa.eu/transport-mode/road/european-union- eu27/infrastructure

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    EV fast charging: How to build and sustain competitive differentiation,

    S. Kane, F. Manz, F. N ¨agele, and R. Felix, “EV fast charging: How to build and sustain competitive differentiation,” McKinsey & Company, Tech. Rep., 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    [Online]

    Tesla, accessed on March 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ir.tesla.com/#quarterly-disclosure

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Grid impact of electric vehicle fast charging stations: Trends, standards, issues and mitigation measures - an overview,

    L. Wang, Z. Qin, T. Slangen, P. Bauer, and T. van Wijk, “Grid impact of electric vehicle fast charging stations: Trends, standards, issues and mitigation measures - an overview,”IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics, vol. 2, pp. 56–74, 2021. IEEE TRANSACTION ON SMART GRIDS 10

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Management of renewable-based multi-energy microgrids with energy storage and integrated electric vehicles considering uncertainties,

    T. Hai, J. Zhou, A. k. Alazzawi, and T. Muranaka, “Management of renewable-based multi-energy microgrids with energy storage and integrated electric vehicles considering uncertainties,”Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 60, p. 106582, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Dynamic energy management of an electric vehicle charging station using pho- tovoltaic power,

    K. Kouka, A. Masmoudi, A. Abdelkafi, and L. Krichen, “Dynamic energy management of an electric vehicle charging station using pho- tovoltaic power,”Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, vol. 24, 12 2020

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Two-layer optimization approach for electric vehicle charging station with dynamic reconfiguration of charging points,

    R. Ramaschi, S. Polimeni, A. Cabrera-Tobar, and S. Leva, “Two-layer optimization approach for electric vehicle charging station with dynamic reconfiguration of charging points,”Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, vol. 40, p. 101531, 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    A Real-Time Charging Scheme for Demand Response in Electric Vehicle Parking Station,

    L. Yao, W. H. Lim, and T. S. Tsai, “A Real-Time Charging Scheme for Demand Response in Electric Vehicle Parking Station,”IEEE Transac- tions on Smart Grid, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 52–62, 1 2017

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Grid-aware scheduling and control of electric vehicle charging stations for dispatching active distribution networks: Theory and experimental validation,

    R. K. Gupta, S. Fahmy, M. Chevron, R. Vasapollo, E. Figini, and M. Paolone, “Grid-aware scheduling and control of electric vehicle charging stations for dispatching active distribution networks: Theory and experimental validation,”IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1575–1589, 2025

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Demand response of an electric vehicle charging station using a robust- explicit model predictive control considering uncertainties to minimize carbon intensity,

    A. Cabrera-Tobar, N. Blasuttigh, A. M. Pavan, and G. Spagnuolo, “Demand response of an electric vehicle charging station using a robust- explicit model predictive control considering uncertainties to minimize carbon intensity,”Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, p. 101381, 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Electric Vehicle Charge Scheduling With Adaptable Charging Ports,

    S. Mishra, A. Mondal, and S. Mondal, “A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Electric Vehicle Charge Scheduling With Adaptable Charging Ports,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 5702–5714, 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Real-time control of an electric vehicle charging station while tracking an aggregated power setpoint,

    R. Rudnik, C. Wang, L. Reyes-Chamorro, J. Achara, J.-Y . L. Boudec, and M. Paolone, “Real-time control of an electric vehicle charging station while tracking an aggregated power setpoint,”IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 5750–5761, 2020

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    A hierarchical admm based framework for ev charging scheduling,

    B. Khaki, C. Chu, and R. Gadh, “A hierarchical admm based framework for ev charging scheduling,” in2018 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (T&D), 2018, pp. 1–9

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Admm-based hierarchical single-loop framework for ev charging scheduling considering power flow constraints,

    S. Kiani, K. Sheshyekani, and H. Dagdougui, “Admm-based hierarchical single-loop framework for ev charging scheduling considering power flow constraints,”IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1089–1100, 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Hierarchical distributed framework for ev charging scheduling using exchange problem,

    B. Khaki, C. Chu, and R. Gadh, “Hierarchical distributed framework for ev charging scheduling using exchange problem,”Applied Energy, vol. 241, pp. 461–471, 2019

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Hierarchical distributed ev charging scheduling in distribution grids,

    B. Khaki, Y .-W. Chung, C. Chu, and R. Gadh, “Hierarchical distributed ev charging scheduling in distribution grids,” in2019 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), 2019, pp. 1–5

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Alternating direction method of multipliers for decentralized electric vehicle charging control,

    J. Rivera, P. Wolfrum, S. Hirche, C. Goebel, and H.-A. Jacobsen, “Alternating direction method of multipliers for decentralized electric vehicle charging control,” in52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2013, pp. 6960–6965

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Admm-based coordination of electric vehicles in constrained distribution networks considering fast charging and degradation,

    X. Zhou, S. Zou, P. Wang, and Z. Ma, “Admm-based coordination of electric vehicles in constrained distribution networks considering fast charging and degradation,”IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transporta- tion Systems, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 565–578, 2021

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    A hybrid incentive program for managing electric vehicle charging flexibility,

    H. Wang, Y . Jia, M. Shi, P. Xie, C. S. Lai, and K. Li, “A hybrid incentive program for managing electric vehicle charging flexibility,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 476–488, 2023

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Game theoretic-based distributed charging strategy for pevs in a smart charging station,

    Y . Wan, J. Qin, F. Li, X. Yu, and Y . Kang, “Game theoretic-based distributed charging strategy for pevs in a smart charging station,”IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 538–547, 2021

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Real-time optimal scheduling of large-scale electric vehicles: A dynamic non- cooperative game approach,

    L. Chen, T. Yu, Y . Chen, W. Guan, Y . Shi, and Z. Pan, “Real-time optimal scheduling of large-scale electric vehicles: A dynamic non- cooperative game approach,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 133 633–133 644, 2020

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Energy management system for smart grid: An overview and key issues,

    S. K. Rathor and D. Saxena, “Energy management system for smart grid: An overview and key issues,”International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 4067–4109, 2020

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    A hierarchical and decen- tralized energy management system for peer-to-peer energy trading,

    M. Elkazaz, M. Sumner, and D. Thomas, “A hierarchical and decen- tralized energy management system for peer-to-peer energy trading,” Applied Energy, vol. 291, p. 116766, 2021

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Grid-aware distributed control of electric vehicle charging stations in active distribution grids,

    S. Fahmy, R. Gupta, and M. Paolone, “Grid-aware distributed control of electric vehicle charging stations in active distribution grids,”Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 189, p. 106697, 2020

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    S. Boyd, N. Parikh, E. Chu, B. Peleato, and J. Eckstein,Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers. Now Foundations and Trends, 2011

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    Fair and scalable electric vehicle charging under electrical grid constraints,

    G. Tsaousoglou, J. S. Giraldo, P. Pinson, and N. G. Paterakis, “Fair and scalable electric vehicle charging under electrical grid constraints,”IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 15 169–15 177, 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    A survey on applications of alternating direction method of multipliers in smart power grids,

    A. Maneesha and K. S. Swarup, “A survey on applications of alternating direction method of multipliers in smart power grids,”Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 152, p. 111687, 2021

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Bridge the gap between admm and stackelberg game: Incentive mechanism design for big data networks,

    Z. Zheng, L. Song, and Z. Han, “Bridge the gap between admm and stackelberg game: Incentive mechanism design for big data networks,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 191–195, 2017

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Bridging the gap between big data and game theory: A general hierarchical pricing framework,

    ——, “Bridging the gap between big data and game theory: A general hierarchical pricing framework,” in2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2017, pp. 1–6

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    A stackelberg game approach to proactive caching in large-scale mobile edge networks,

    Z. Zheng, L. Song, Z. Han, G. Y . Li, and H. V . Poor, “A stackelberg game approach to proactive caching in large-scale mobile edge networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 5198–5211, 2018

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    A stackelberg game approach to large-scale edge caching,

    ——, “A stackelberg game approach to large-scale edge caching,” in 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2018, pp. 1–6

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    A stackelberg game approach to resource allocation for irs-aided commu- nications,

    Y . Gao, C. Yong, Z. Xiong, D. Niyato, Y . Xiao, and J. Zhao, “A stackelberg game approach to resource allocation for irs-aided commu- nications,” inGLOBECOM 2020 - 2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference, 2020, pp. 1–6

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Enabling green mobile-edge computing for 5g-based healthcare applications,

    P. K. Bishoyi and S. Misra, “Enabling green mobile-edge computing for 5g-based healthcare applications,”IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1623–1631, 2021

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Preschool education optimization based on mobile edge computing under covid-19,

    H. Wei, Y . Yang, and Z. Liu, “Preschool education optimization based on mobile edge computing under covid-19,”Expert Systems, vol. 40, no. 4, p. e12922, 2023

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Incentive mechanism design in semi-asynchronous blockchain-based federated learning,

    X. Liu, J. Liu, X. Wei, and Y . Wang, “Incentive mechanism design in semi-asynchronous blockchain-based federated learning,” in2024 IEEE 100th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2024-Fall), 2024, pp. 1–5

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Large scale resource allocation for the internet of things network based on admm,

    Y . He, S. Zhang, L. Tang, and Y . Ren, “Large scale resource allocation for the internet of things network based on admm,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 57 192–57 203, 2020

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Pricing and resource allocation optimization for iot fog computing and nfv: An epec and matching based perspective,

    N. Raveendran, H. Zhang, L. Song, L.-C. Wang, C. S. Hong, and Z. Han, “Pricing and resource allocation optimization for iot fog computing and nfv: An epec and matching based perspective,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1349–1361, 2022

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Computing offloading of multi-MEC nodes in blockchain-based parked vehicle edge computing,

    K. Liu, J. Xu, H. Yang, and X. Lin, “Computing offloading of multi-MEC nodes in blockchain-based parked vehicle edge computing,” inSecond International Conference on Advanced Algorithms and Signal Image Processing (AASIP 2022), K. Subramaniyam, Ed., vol. 12475, International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE, 2022, p. 124751J. [Online]. Available: ht...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2659383 2022

  41. [41]

    Dynamic digital twin and distributed incentives for resource allocation in aerial-assisted internet of vehicles,

    W. Sun, P. Wang, N. Xu, G. Wang, and Y . Zhang, “Dynamic digital twin and distributed incentives for resource allocation in aerial-assisted internet of vehicles,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 5839–5852, 2022

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Distributed incentives and digital twin for resource allocation in air-assisted internet of vehicles,

    P. Wang, N. Xu, W. Sun, G. Wang, and Y . Zhang, “Distributed incentives and digital twin for resource allocation in air-assisted internet of vehicles,” in2021 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2021, pp. 1–6

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Joint optimiza- tion of energy conservation and privacy preservation for intelligent task offloading in mec-enabled smart cities,

    K. Peng, H. Huang, P. Liu, X. Xu, and V . C. M. Leung, “Joint optimiza- tion of energy conservation and privacy preservation for intelligent task offloading in mec-enabled smart cities,”IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1671–1682, 2022

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Decentralized pricing mecha- nism for traffic and charging station management of evs in smart cities,

    M. Ghavami, M. Haeri, and H. Kebriaei, “Decentralized pricing mecha- nism for traffic and charging station management of evs in smart cities,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 5258–5270, 2024

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Optimal sizing of battery and grid connection of electric vehicle charging stations,

    R. Ramaschi, M. Paolone, and S. Leva, “Optimal sizing of battery and grid connection of electric vehicle charging stations,” in2025 IEEE Kiel PowerTech, 2025, pp. 1–7

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Impact of v2g service provision on battery life,

    S. Bhoir, P. Caliandro, and C. Brivio, “Impact of v2g service provision on battery life,”Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 44, p. 103178, 2021

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Boyd and L

    S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe,Convex Optimization, 7th ed. Cambridge University Press, 2004

    work page 2004

  48. [48]

    Control of battery storage systems for the simultaneous provision of multiple services,

    E. Namor, F. Sossan, R. Cherkaoui, and M. Paolone, “Control of battery storage systems for the simultaneous provision of multiple services,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2799–2808, 2019

    work page 2019