Ehrhart positivity for marked order polytopes
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:50 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
A criterion on pairs of posets establishes that marked order polytopes of skew shapes are Ehrhart positive in the multivariate sense.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Given a pair of finite posets A contained in P, the number of order-preserving extensions of a labeling on A is a piecewise polynomial in the values of that labeling. A combinatorial criterion on the pair ensures that all coefficients in this polynomial are nonnegative. Marked order polytopes of skew shapes satisfy the criterion, so their Ehrhart polynomials are nonnegative in the multivariate sense.
What carries the argument
The criterion for nonnegativity of coefficients in the multivariate piecewise polynomial that counts order-preserving extensions of maps from subposet A to poset P.
If this is right
- Marked order polytopes of skew shapes have Ehrhart polynomials whose coefficients are all nonnegative.
- The nonnegativity holds in the multivariate setting with one variable for each marked element.
- The same criterion recovers the Ehrhart positivity already known for order polytopes of skew shapes.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The criterion implies Ehrhart positivity for skew Gelfand-Tsetlin polytopes.
- The criterion implies Ehrhart positivity for m-generalized Pitman-Stanley polytopes.
- Any other poset pair that meets the combinatorial condition will likewise yield marked order polytopes with nonnegative Ehrhart coefficients.
Load-bearing premise
The combinatorial condition on the pair of posets A contained in P is sufficient to guarantee nonnegativity of every coefficient in the counting polynomial.
What would settle it
A pair of posets that satisfies the combinatorial condition but whose counting polynomial has a negative coefficient in some monomial would disprove the criterion.
Figures
read the original abstract
Given a pair of finite posets $A \subseteq P$, the function counting integer-valued order preserving extensions of an order preserving map $\lambda : A\rightarrow \mathbb{Z}$ from $A$ to $P$ is given by a piecewise polynomial in $\lambda$. We provide a criterion for the nonnegativity of the coefficients of these multivariate polynomials and apply it to show that marked order polytopes of skew shapes are Ehrhart positive in a multivariate sense. This extends recent results of Ferroni-Morales-Panova on order polytopes of skew shapes and proves conjectures on the Ehrhart positivity of skew Gelfand-Tsetlin polytopes and $m$-generalized Pitman-Stanley polytopes due to Alexanderson-Alhajjar and Dugan-Hegarty-Morales-Raymond, respectively.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper provides a criterion for the nonnegativity of coefficients in the multivariate piecewise polynomial counting integer-valued order-preserving extensions of an order-preserving map λ from a subposet A to P. It applies this criterion to prove that marked order polytopes of skew shapes are Ehrhart positive in the multivariate sense. This extends results of Ferroni-Morales-Panova on order polytopes of skew shapes and resolves conjectures on Ehrhart positivity for skew Gelfand-Tsetlin polytopes and m-generalized Pitman-Stanley polytopes.
Significance. If the criterion holds and its application to skew shapes is valid, the result is significant: it supplies a general combinatorial tool for establishing multivariate Ehrhart positivity for polytopes arising from pairs of posets A ⊆ P, unifies several positivity questions in the literature, and settles specific open conjectures. The reduction of the relevant polytopes to the marked-order setting is a strength, as is the explicit verification that the combinatorial condition holds for skew shapes.
minor comments (2)
- [§1] The abstract refers to 'marked order polytopes' without a self-contained definition or pointer to the precise construction used here; adding a one-sentence reminder in §1 would improve accessibility for readers outside the immediate subfield.
- Notation for the piecewise polynomial (e.g., the variables corresponding to the values of λ) is introduced in the statement of the criterion; a short table or diagram in the section presenting the criterion would clarify the correspondence between coordinates and poset elements.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript, for highlighting its significance in unifying several positivity questions and resolving open conjectures, and for recommending minor revision. We will make the appropriate minor changes in the revised version.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; self-contained combinatorial proof
full rationale
The paper defines a general criterion for nonnegativity of coefficients in the piecewise polynomial that counts order-preserving extensions of maps from A to P, then verifies that the criterion applies to the marked order polytopes of skew shapes by checking a stated combinatorial condition on the pair A ⊆ P. This verification is direct and independent of the target positivity statement; the multivariate Ehrhart function is identified with the counting function by standard definitions, and the argument extends prior results of Ferroni-Morales-Panova without reducing any load-bearing step to a self-citation, fitted parameter, or tautological renaming. No equations are shown to be equivalent by construction, and the central claim remains a verifiable combinatorial reduction rather than a circular re-expression of its inputs.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- standard math Finite posets admit order-preserving extensions whose counting function is piecewise polynomial (standard Ehrhart theory for order polytopes).
- domain assumption Skew shapes induce marked order polytopes whose extension-counting polynomials satisfy the paper's nonnegativity criterion.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
,Volume and lattice points of generalized Pitman-Stanley flow polytopes, Sém. Lothar. Combin., 93B (2025), pp. Art. 94, 12. 3, 5 [6]E. Ehrhart,Sur les polyèdres rationnels homothétiques àndimensions, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 254 (1962), pp. 616–618. 1 [7]X. F ang, G. Fourier, J.-P. Litza, and C. Pegel,A continuous family of marked poset polytopes, SIAM J. ...
-
[2]
Thesis (Ph.D.)–Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 6 [13]A. Lascoux and M.-P. Schützenberger,Polynômes de Schubert, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math., 294 (1982), pp. 447–450. 6 [14]F. Liu,On positivity of Ehrhart polynomials, in Recent trends in algebraic combinatorics, vol. 16 of Assoc. Women Math. Ser., Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 189–237. 1 [15]F. ...
work page 1982
-
[3]
6 [17]J. Shareshian, D. Wright, and W. Zhao,A new approach to order polynomials of labeled posets and their generalizations, arXiv preprint math/0311426, (2003). 3 [18]R. P. Stanley,A chromatic-like polynomial for ordered sets, in Proc. Second Chapel Hill Conf. on Com- binatorial Mathematics and its Applications (Univ. North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1...
-
[4]
,Two combinatorial applications of the Aleksandrov-Fenchel inequalities, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 31 (1981), pp. 56–65. 2
work page 1981
-
[5]
,Two poset polytopes, Discrete Comput. Geom., 1 (1986), pp. 9–23. 1
work page 1986
-
[6]
,Positivity of Ehrhart polynomial coefficients, mathoverflow (online forum), (2015). 1
work page 2015
-
[7]
,Enumerative combinatorics. Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, second ed., 2024. 3 [23]R. P. Stanley and J. Pitman,A polytope related to empirical distributions, plane trees, parking functions, and the associahedron, Discrete Comput. Geom., 27 (2002), pp. 603–634. 2, 3, 4 KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Mathematics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, ...
work page 2024
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.