pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.08769 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Recognition: unknown

EPISODE IV: Ice Inventory in the Envelope of EC 53

Jaeyeong Kim , Jeong-Eun Lee , Chul-Hwan Kim , Seokho Lee , Giseon Baek , Seonjae Lee , Yao-Lun Yang , Yuri Aikawa
show 4 more authors
Gregory J. Herczeg Doug Johnstone Joel D. Green Woong-Seob Jeong
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords protostellar iceaccretion burstJWST spectroscopyEC 53envelope chemistrysilicate correctionice inventoryepisodic accretion
0
0 comments X

The pith

Accretion bursts in EC 53 produce no detectable changes in envelope ice absorption features.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper analyzes JWST spectra of the protostar EC 53 taken during its quiescent and burst phases to examine the ice composition in its envelope. After correcting for silicate dust absorption, the authors decompose the ice features into major components like water, CO2, methanol, and others using lab profiles. They find no measurable differences in any ice band between the two phases, suggesting that these moderate, short-period bursts do not alter the physical or chemical state of the ices. The derived ice abundances are higher than typical for embedded protostars, positioning EC 53 as a benchmark for studying ice evolution under episodic accretion.

Core claim

The silicate-corrected spectra of EC 53 show no measurable change in any ice absorption band between quiescent and burst phases. This indicates that moderate and short-period accretion bursts do not significantly alter the physical or chemical state of the ices within its envelope. The ice abundances relative to water exceed those in other protostars, providing a chemically rich, thermally quiescent reservoir for comparison.

What carries the argument

Silicate dust absorption modeling and removal via dedicated continuum-fitting, followed by decomposition of ice bands matching laboratory spectra for pure and mixed ices.

If this is right

  • Moderate accretion bursts in young protostars like EC 53 preserve the ice inventory without significant processing.
  • The high abundances of major ice species provide a reference point for chemical models of protostellar envelopes.
  • EC 53 serves as a benchmark system for tracking ice evolution in the presence of episodic accretion.
  • Minor contributions from complex organic molecules are present but do not vary with phase.
  • Periodic brightness variations do not induce observable thermal or chemical changes in envelope ices on short timescales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar observations of other bursting protostars could test if this stability holds across different burst amplitudes or periods.
  • Models of ice mantle processing may need to incorporate thresholds for burst intensity before significant desorption or reaction occurs.
  • Longer-term monitoring could reveal cumulative effects not captured in single burst cycles.
  • Comparisons with non-bursting protostars would clarify the role of accretion history in setting ice compositions.

Load-bearing premise

The dedicated continuum-fitting procedure for silicate dust absorption accurately isolates ice features without introducing residuals that could hide small phase-dependent changes.

What would settle it

Detection of a statistically significant difference in optical depth of any ice band, such as the 3 micron water ice feature, between future quiescent and burst spectra after identical silicate correction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08769 by Chul-Hwan Kim, Doug Johnstone, Giseon Baek, Gregory J. Herczeg, Jaeyeong Kim, Jeong-Eun Lee, Joel D. Green, Seokho Lee, Seonjae Lee, Woong-Seob Jeong, Yao-Lun Yang, Yuri Aikawa.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Total spectrum of EC 53 reduced from the NIRSpec IFU and MIRI MRS observations at the quiescent (blue) and burst (red) phases, respectively. Silicate and ice absorption bands are labeled. The complex absorption band of COM ices is highlighted in brown. In particular, the steep flux level decrease shortward of 2.0 µm causes the polynomial fit to diverge from the observed spectral feature, leading to an unre… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Top: Optimized continuum curve (black dashed line) produced by the Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) method to the NIRSpec spectrum of EC 53 in the quiescent phase. Middle: The same figure of the top panel, but for the burst phase. Bottom: Converted optical depth spectrum for the ice absorption features of both phases. growth, consistent with the accompanying red wing structure (Dartois et al. 2024). A det… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: MIRI MRS spectrum of EC 53 observed at quiescent phase (top) and burst phase (middle). The continuum curve fitted by a fourth-order polynomial is adjusted using the combined silicate absorption profile derived from laboratory opacities of amorphous pyroxene (Mg0.7Fe0.3SiO3) and olivine (MgFeSiO4) to reproduce the absorption features near 10 µm and 18 µm. The NH3-based ice features (the cyan- and orange-sha… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Flowchart summarizing the continuum determination and spectral decomposition procedure applied to the JWST NIRSpec IFU and MIRI MRS observations of EC 53 in both quiescent and burst phases. These steps are combined within an optimization framework to derive the final corrected continuum and the combined optical depth spectrum. The middle panel shows the difference in optical depth spectra between the burst… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ice composition of the pure H2O with a combination of two temperatures (10 K and 160 K) at the entire spectral range. From top to bottom, panels show the NIRSpec and MIRI spectral coverage, highlighting the dominant absorption bands [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Final result of the global ice fitting for EC 53. The silicate-subtracted spectrum obtained during the burst phase is shown in black. The gray shaded region represents the total modeled ice absorption constructed by summing the absorption profiles of all identified ice components on top of the combined H2O ice baseline. The combined H2O component is shown as a blue shaded region, while individual contribut… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Two-dimensional density and temperature structure of the EC 53 envelope derived from the radiative transfer model of (Baek et al. 2020). The background color map shows the gas number density, with the blue region indicating the outflow cavity and the green-to-orange region tracing the dense envelope. A representative line of sight toward the observer is indicated by a dashed arrow, illustrating the viewing… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of the continuum fitting and silicate subtraction applied to the JWST/MIRI spectra of EC 53 and B1-c (JWST GTO program 1290; PI: E. F. van Dishoeck). The top panel shows the normalized spectra (solid lines), best-fit continua (dashed lines), and fitted silicate absorption profiles (shaded regions) for both sources using an identical normalization range (7.8–8.0 µm) and fitting procedure. The bot… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Global ice composition of the major species applied to the silicate-subtracted JWST/MIRI MRS spectrum of B1-c. The shaded region shows the combined ice absorption constructed from the sum of laboratory profiles (solid and dashed lines) corresponding to individual ice species. The combined profile reproduces the major ice absorption bands across the 5–20 µm range, including contributions from H2O (blue), CO… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the 1.6$-$28 $\mu$m spectra of the young protostar EC 53, obtained with JWST NIRSpec IFU and MIRI MRS during the quiescent and burst phases of its periodic brightness variations. To isolate ice absorption features, we modeled and removed the mid-infrared silicate dust absorption using a dedicated continuum-fitting procedure. In the optical depth spectrum, we first fit the broad H$_2$O ice features and then decomposed the major ice components, including NH$_3$, CO$_2$, CH$_3$OH, CO, and CH$_4$, by matching laboratory profiles for both pure and H$_2$O-mixed ices. The 4.62 $\mu$m and 6.85 $\mu$m bands are attributed to OCN$^-$ and NH$_4^+$ ions, respectively. Minor or tentative contributions from complex species (HCOOH, H$_2$CO, CH$_3$COOH, CH$_3$CHO, CH$_3$CH$_2$OH, and NH$_2$CHO) are also considered to our global ice analysis. The silicate-corrected spectra reveal no measurable change in any ice absorption band between the two phases, indicating that moderate and short-period accretion bursts in EC~53 do not significantly alter the physical or chemical state of the ices within its envelope. The derived abundances of these major species relative to H$_2$O significantly exceed the values typically observed toward other embedded protostars. Finally, we place the ice inventory of EC~53 in the context of other protostellar systems observed with JWST, highlighting that its chemically rich, thermally quiescent ice reservoir provides a benchmark for studying ice evolution under episodic accretion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents 1.6-28 μm JWST NIRSpec IFU and MIRI MRS spectra of the young protostar EC 53 obtained during quiescent and burst phases of its periodic brightness variations. After modeling and removing mid-infrared silicate dust absorption via a dedicated continuum-fitting procedure, the authors isolate the optical depth spectrum and decompose major ice components (H2O, NH3, CO2, CH3OH, CO, CH4) plus ions (OCN− at 4.62 μm, NH4+ at 6.85 μm) by matching laboratory profiles for pure and H2O-mixed ices, with minor/tentative contributions from complex organics. They report no measurable change in any ice absorption band between phases, unusually high abundances relative to H2O compared to other embedded protostars, and position EC 53 as a benchmark for ice evolution under episodic accretion.

Significance. If the no-change result holds after rigorous validation of the silicate subtraction, the work provides an important observational constraint showing that moderate, short-period accretion bursts do not significantly alter the physical or chemical state of ices in the envelope. The detailed, chemically rich ice inventory and direct comparison to other JWST-observed protostellar systems establish a valuable reference point for models of ice chemistry and thermal processing.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim of no measurable change in ice bands (and thus no significant alteration by bursts) is load-bearing on the silicate-corrected spectra. The dedicated continuum-fitting procedure for removing the 9.7 and 18 μm silicate features must be described with the specific functional form or template library, whether the fit is performed independently for each phase or jointly, and quantified residuals in the 3–8 μm and 15–20 μm windows to demonstrate that phase-dependent artifacts are smaller than noise and do not mask small variations in ice column or temperature.
minor comments (2)
  1. The statement that abundances 'significantly exceed' typical values for other protostars would be strengthened by a table comparing the derived column densities or relative abundances (with uncertainties) to literature values from other JWST or ground-based observations.
  2. Clarify how 'no measurable change' is assessed quantitatively (e.g., via upper limits on ΔN or formal statistical comparison of the two optical depth spectra) rather than relying solely on visual inspection of the silicate-corrected spectra.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the significance of our results and for the constructive major comment. We address it point by point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim of no measurable change in ice bands (and thus no significant alteration by bursts) is load-bearing on the silicate-corrected spectra. The dedicated continuum-fitting procedure for removing the 9.7 and 18 μm silicate features must be described with the specific functional form or template library, whether the fit is performed independently for each phase or jointly, and quantified residuals in the 3–8 μm and 15–20 μm windows to demonstrate that phase-dependent artifacts are smaller than noise and do not mask small variations in ice column or temperature.

    Authors: We agree that additional detail on the silicate subtraction is required to fully support the central no-change result. In the revised manuscript we will expand Section 3.2 (or equivalent) to specify the exact functional form and/or template library used for the continuum fit, state whether the fit was performed jointly across both phases or independently, and include quantified residuals (with direct comparison to the noise level) in the 3–8 μm and 15–20 μm windows. These additions will explicitly demonstrate that any residual artifacts are smaller than the noise and cannot mask the reported ice-band variations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in observational spectral comparison

full rationale

The paper performs a direct observational comparison of JWST NIRSpec/MIRI spectra of EC 53 in quiescent vs. burst phases. Ice bands are isolated by subtracting a silicate continuum model (described as a dedicated fitting procedure) and then matched to independent laboratory ice templates for H2O, CO2, CH3OH, etc. No derivation chain, prediction, or uniqueness claim reduces to its own inputs by construction; the no-measurable-change result is a direct data comparison after standard processing. Abundances are reported relative to H2O from the same spectra. No self-citation load-bearing steps or ansatz smuggling appear in the provided text. This is a self-contained observational analysis against external lab benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Analysis depends on continuum modeling parameters and scaling factors for ice components; relies on standard assumptions that lab ice spectra match astrophysical conditions and that silicate and ice absorptions can be separated.

free parameters (2)
  • Continuum fitting parameters
    Multiple parameters in the dedicated procedure to model and remove mid-infrared silicate dust absorption.
  • Ice component scaling factors
    Scaling coefficients used to match laboratory profiles of pure and H2O-mixed ices to observed optical depth bands.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Laboratory spectra of pure and mixed ices at relevant temperatures accurately represent the composition and band shapes in the protostellar envelope.
    Invoked when decomposing observed bands for H2O, NH3, CO2, CH3OH, CO, CH4 and ions.
  • domain assumption Silicate dust absorption can be modeled independently and subtracted without affecting the underlying ice optical depth spectrum.
    Core step in the continuum-fitting procedure described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5667 in / 1383 out tokens · 48163 ms · 2026-05-10T16:48:45.655643+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 95 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    2012, A&A, 538, A57, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015999 Altwegg, K., Combi, M., Fuselier, S

    Aikawa, Y., Kamuro, D., Sakon, I., et al. 2012, A&A, 538, A57, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015999

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015999 2012

  2. [2]

    Walker, R. L. 1999, SSRv, 90, 219, doi: 10.1023/A:1005210417396 46

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1005210417396 1999

  3. [3]

    R., et al

    Argyriou, I., Glasse, A., Law, D. R., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346489

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346489 2023

  4. [4]

    2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    Armitage, P. J., Livio, M., & Pringle, J. E. 2001, MNRAS, 324, 705, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04356.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04356.x 2001

  5. [5]

    A., Lee, J.-E., et al

    Baek, G., MacFarlane, B. A., Lee, J.-E., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, 27, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8ad4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8ad4 2020

  6. [6]

    R., & Lin, D

    Bell, K. R., & Lin, D. N. C. 1994, ApJ, 427, 987, doi: 10.1086/174206

    work page doi:10.1086/174206 1994

  7. [7]

    2007, A&A, 474, 1061, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078210 B¨ oker, T., Arribas, S., L¨ utzgendorf, N., et al

    Linnartz, H. 2007, A&A, 474, 1061, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078210 B¨ oker, T., Arribas, S., L¨ utzgendorf, N., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142589

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078210 2007

  8. [8]

    1992, ApJL, 401, L31, doi: 10.1086/186663

    Bonnell, I., & Bastien, P. 1992, ApJL, 401, L31, doi: 10.1086/186663

    work page doi:10.1086/186663 1992

  9. [9]

    Boogert, A. C. A., Blake, G. A., & ¨Oberg, K. 2004, ApJ, 615, 344, doi: 10.1086/423979

    work page doi:10.1086/423979 2004

  10. [10]

    Boogert, A. C. A., Gerakines, P. A., & Whittet, D. C. B. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 541, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122348

    work page Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122348 2015

  11. [11]

    Boogert, A. C. A., Schutte, W. A., Helmich, F. P., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Wooden, D. H. 1997, A&A, 317, 929

    1997

  12. [12]

    Boogert, A. C. A., Pontoppidan, K. M., Knez, C., et al. 2008, ApJ, 678, 985, doi: 10.1086/533425

    work page doi:10.1086/533425 2008

  13. [13]

    Boogert, A. C. A., Huard, T. L., Cook, A. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 729, 92, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/729/2/92

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/729/2/92 2011

  14. [14]

    Bottinelli, S., Boogert, A. C. A., Bouwman, J., et al. 2010, ApJ, 718, 1100, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/718/2/1100

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/718/2/1100 2010

  15. [15]

    2015, MNRAS, 451, 2145, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1021

    Bouilloud, M., Fray, N., B´ enilan, Y., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 2145, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1021

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1021 2015

  16. [16]

    Y., Sellgren, K., & Geballe, T

    Brooke, T. Y., Sellgren, K., & Geballe, T. R. 1999, ApJ, 517, 883, doi: 10.1086/307237

    work page doi:10.1086/307237 1999

  17. [17]

    Brunken, N. G. C., Rocha, W. R. M., van Dishoeck, E. F., et al. 2024a, A&A, 685, A27, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348718

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348718

  18. [18]

    Brunken, N. G. C., van Dishoeck, E. F., Slavicinska, K., et al. 2024b, A&A, 692, A163, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451794

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451794

  19. [19]

    Chen, Y., Rocha, W. R. M., van Dishoeck, E. F., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A205, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450706

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450706 2024

  20. [20]

    A., Casassus, S., Tobin, J., et al

    Cieza, L. A., Casassus, S., Tobin, J., et al. 2016, Nature, 535, 258, doi: 10.1038/nature18612

    work page doi:10.1038/nature18612 2016

  21. [21]

    2023, MNRAS, 523, 5522, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1784

    Cleaver, J., Hartmann, L., & Bae, J. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 5522, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1784

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1784 2023

  22. [22]

    A., Caselli, P., et al

    Dartois, E., Noble, J. A., Caselli, P., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 359, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02155-x D’Hendecourt, L. B., & Allamandola, L. J. 1986, A&AS, 64, 453

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02155-x 2024

  23. [23]

    2021, OpTool: Command-line driven tool for creating complex dust opacities, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2104.010

    Dominik, C., Min, M., & Tazaki, R. 2021, OpTool: Command-line driven tool for creating complex dust opacities, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2104.010

    2021

  24. [24]

    1995, A&A, 300, 503

    Mutschke, H. 1995, A&A, 300, 503

    1995

  25. [25]

    M., Arce, H

    Dunham, M. M., Arce, H. G., Mardones, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 783, 29, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/29

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/783/1/29 2014

  26. [26]

    M., Crapsi, A., Evans, II, N

    Dunham, M. M., Crapsi, A., Evans, II, N. J., et al. 2008, ApJS, 179, 249, doi: 10.1086/591085

    work page doi:10.1086/591085 2008

  27. [27]

    Tielens, A. G. G. M., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 1997, A&A, 328, 649

    1997

  28. [28]

    A., et al

    Ehrenfreund, P., Kerkhof, O., Schutte, W. A., et al. 1999, A&A, 350, 240

    1999

  29. [29]

    L., Evans, II, N

    Enoch, M. L., Evans, II, N. J., Sargent, A. I., & Glenn, J. 2009, ApJ, 692, 973, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/692/2/973

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/692/2/973 2009

  30. [30]

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/321 , eprint =

    Evans, Neal J., I., Dunham, M. M., Jørgensen, J. K., et al. 2009, ApJS, 181, 321, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/321

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/321 2009

  31. [31]

    2015, MNRAS, 446, 439, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2028

    Linnartz, H. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 439, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2028

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2028 2015

  32. [32]

    J., Hillenbrand, L

    Fischer, W. J., Hillenbrand, L. A., Herczeg, G. J., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference

    2023

  33. [33]

    Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =

    Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 355, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.11257

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.11257

  34. [34]

    and Lang, Dustin and Goodman, Jonathan , title =

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  35. [35]

    2022, ApJ, 937, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8a9e

    Francis, L., Johnstone, D., Lee, J.-E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 937, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8a9e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8a9e 2022

  36. [36]

    J., & van Dishoeck, E

    Fraser, H. J., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2004, Advances in Space Research, 33, 14

    2004

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Clampin, M., et al. 2006, SSRv, 123, 485, doi: 10.1007/s11214-006-8315-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-006-8315-7 2006

  38. [38]

    A., Schutte, W

    Gerakines, P. A., Schutte, W. A., & Ehrenfreund, P. 1996, A&A, 312, 289

    1996

  39. [39]

    L., & Whittet, D

    Gibb, E. L., & Whittet, D. C. B. 2002, ApJL, 566, L113, doi: 10.1086/339633

    work page doi:10.1086/339633 2002

  40. [40]

    Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2004, ApJS, 151, 35, doi: 10.1086/381182

    work page doi:10.1086/381182 2004

  41. [41]

    M., Li, A., Mendoza-Gomez, C

    Greenberg, J. M., Li, A., Mendoza-Gomez, C. X., et al. 1995, ApJL, 455, L177, doi: 10.1086/309834

    work page doi:10.1086/309834 1995

  42. [42]

    Hagen, W., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Greenberg, J. M. 1983, A&AS, 51, 389

    1983

  43. [43]

    1998, ApJ, 495, 385, doi: 10.1086/305277

    Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., Gullbring, E., & D’Alessio, P. 1998, ApJ, 495, 385, doi: 10.1086/305277

    work page doi:10.1086/305277 1998

  44. [44]

    2010, ARA&A, 48, 21, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130815 47

    Henning, T. 2010, ARA&A, 48, 21, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130815 47

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130815 2010

  45. [45]

    Herbst, E., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 427, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101654

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101654 2009

  46. [46]

    Hodapp, K. W. 1999, AJ, 118, 1338, doi: 10.1086/301003

    work page doi:10.1086/301003 1999

  47. [47]

    W., Chini, R., Watermann, R., & Lemke, R

    Hodapp, K. W., Chini, R., Watermann, R., & Lemke, R. 2012, ApJ, 744, 56, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/56

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/744/1/56 2012

  48. [48]

    2013, ApJS, 205, 5, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/205/1/5

    Hsieh, T.-H., & Lai, S.-P. 2013, ApJS, 205, 5, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/205/1/5

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/205/1/5 2013

  49. [49]

    M., Belloche, A., et al

    Hsieh, T.-H., Murillo, N. M., Belloche, A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, 149, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab425a —. 2018, ApJ, 854, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa7f6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab425a 2019

  50. [50]

    Hudson, R. L. 2017, Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular Spectroscopy, 187, 82, doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2017.06.027

    work page doi:10.1016/j.saa.2017.06.027 2017

  51. [51]

    L., & Moore , M

    Hudson, R. L., & Moore, M. H. 1999, Icarus, 140, 451, doi: 10.1006/icar.1999.6144

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6144 1999

  52. [52]

    2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    Jakobsen, P., Ferruit, P., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142663 2022

  53. [53]

    H., McClure, M

    Jin, M., Lam, K. H., McClure, M. K., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 133, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8006

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8006 2022

  54. [54]

    2020, ApJ, 895, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8bd8 Kakkenpara Suresh, S., Sipil¨ a, O., Caselli, P., & Dulieu, F

    Kadam, K., Vorobyov, E., Reg´ aly, Z., K´ osp´ al,´A., & ´Abrah´ am, P. 2020, ApJ, 895, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8bd8 Kakkenpara Suresh, S., Sipil¨ a, O., Caselli, P., & Dulieu, F. 2025, A&A, 696, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451665

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8bd8 2020

  55. [55]

    A., & Whittet, D

    Schutte, W. A., & Whittet, D. C. B. 2001, A&A, 376, 254, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010936

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010936 2001

  56. [56]

    J., & Tielens, A

    Kemper, F., Vriend, W. J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2004, ApJ, 609, 826, doi: 10.1086/421339

    work page doi:10.1086/421339 2004

  57. [57]

    Pontoppidan, K. M. 2012, ApJ, 758, 38, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/758/1/38

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/758/1/38 2012

  58. [58]

    2025, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 58, 111, doi: 10.5303/JKAS.2025.58.1.111

    Kim, J., Lee, J.-E., Kim, C.-H., Jeong, W.-S., & Yang, Y.-L. 2025, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 58, 111, doi: 10.5303/JKAS.2025.58.1.111

    work page doi:10.5303/jkas.2025.58.1.111 2025

  59. [59]

    2022, ApJ, 935, 137, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7f9f

    Kim, J., Lee, J.-E., Jeong, W.-S., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 137, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7f9f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7f9f 2022

  60. [60]

    Knez, C., Boogert, A. C. A., Pontoppidan, K. M., et al. 2005, ApJL, 635, L145, doi: 10.1086/499584

    work page doi:10.1086/499584 2005

  61. [61]

    Law, D. R., E. Morrison, J., Argyriou, I., et al. 2023, AJ, 166, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acdddc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acdddc 2023

  62. [62]

    2007, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 40, 83, doi: 10.5303/JKAS.2007.40.4.083

    Lee, J.-E. 2007, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 40, 83, doi: 10.5303/JKAS.2007.40.4.083

    work page doi:10.5303/jkas.2007.40.4.083 2007

  63. [63]

    A., & Evans, II, N

    Lee, J.-E., Bergin, E. A., & Evans, II, N. J. 2004, ApJ, 617, 360, doi: 10.1086/425153

    work page doi:10.1086/425153 2004

  64. [64]

    J., Baek, G., et al

    Lee, J.-E., Evans, N. J., Baek, G., et al. 2025, ApJL, 978, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad841f

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad841f 2025

  65. [65]

    2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 314, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0680-0

    Lee, J.-E., Lee, S., Baek, G., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 314, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0680-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0680-0 2019

  66. [66]

    2026a, Nature, 649, 853, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09939-3

    Lee, J.-E., Kim, C.-H., Kim, J., et al. 2026a, Nature, 649, 853, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09939-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09939-3

  67. [67]

    2020a, ApJ, 889, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5a7e

    Lee, S., Lee, J.-E., Aikawa, Y., Herczeg, G., & Johnstone, D. 2020a, ApJ, 889, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5a7e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5a7e

  68. [68]

    2026b, ApJ, 1000, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae4234

    Lee, S., Lee, J.-E., Kim, C.-H., et al. 2026b, ApJ, 1000, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae4234

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4234

  69. [69]

    2020b, ApJ, 903, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb6fe

    Lee, Y.-H., Johnstone, D., Lee, J.-E., et al. 2020b, ApJ, 903, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb6fe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb6fe

  70. [70]

    N., Inutsuka, S.-i., & Matsumoto, T

    Machida, M. N., Inutsuka, S.-i., & Matsumoto, T. 2011, ApJ, 729, 42, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/729/1/42

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/729/1/42 2011

  71. [71]

    K., Rocha, W

    McClure, M. K., Rocha, W. R. M., Pontoppidan, K. M., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 431, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01875-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01875-w 2023

  72. [72]

    2005, SSRv, 119, 3, doi: 10.1007/s11214-005-8066-x

    Molster, F., & Kemper, C. 2005, SSRv, 119, 3, doi: 10.1007/s11214-005-8066-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-005-8066-x 2005

  73. [73]

    2018, ApJ, 866, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadfd9

    Molyarova, T., Akimkin, V., Semenov, D., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadfd9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadfd9 2018

  74. [74]

    Moore and R.F

    Moore, M. H., Ferrante, R. F., Hudson, R. L., & Stone, J. N. 2007, Icarus, 190, 260, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.02.020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.02.020 2007

  75. [75]

    Pontzen and F

    Nayakshin, S., & Lodato, G. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 70, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21612.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21612.x 2012

  76. [76]

    Nazari, P., Rocha, W. R. M., Rubinstein, A. E., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348695

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348695 2024

  77. [77]

    A., Fraser, H

    Noble, J. A., Fraser, H. J., Aikawa, Y., Pontoppidan, K. M., & Sakon, I. 2013, ApJ, 775, 85, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/85

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/775/2/85 2013

  78. [78]

    H., Schutte, W

    Novozamsky, J. H., Schutte, W. A., & Keane, J. V. 2001, A&A, 379, 588, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011332 ¨Oberg, K. I. 2016, Chemical Reviews, 116, 9631, doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00694 ¨Oberg, K. I., Boogert, A. C. A., Pontoppidan, K. M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1032, doi: 10.1086/533432 —. 2011, ApJ, 740, 109 ¨Oberg, K. I., Fayolle, E. C., Cuppen, H. M., ...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011332 2001

  79. [79]

    2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825

    Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., et al. 2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825

    2011

  80. [80]

    Perotti, G., Rocha, W. R. M., Jørgensen, J. K., et al. 2020, A&A, 643, A48, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038102

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038102 2020

Showing first 80 references.