pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09090 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det

Controlled beams of cryo-cooled protein-like nanoparticles

Jingxuan He , Karol D{\l}ugo{\l}ecki , Hubertus Bromberger , Amit K. Samanta , Jochen K\"upper This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det
keywords cryogenic nanoparticlesbuffer gas cellaerodynamic lensprotein beamssingle-particle imagingvelocity-map imagingstrong-field ionization
0
0 comments X

The pith

A cryogenic buffer-gas cell and aerodynamic lens stack produces dense beams of shock-frozen isolated protein nanoparticles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper describes a new setup that combines a cryogenic buffer-gas cell with an aerodynamic lens stack to create controllable beams of nanoparticles cooled to low temperatures. These beams include small and low-density particles such as isolated proteins that remain intact in the gas phase. Characterization relies on strong-field ionization paired with velocity-map imaging to map particle trajectories and determine flux and density without ambiguity. The approach supplies a practical route for delivering protein-like samples to experiments that need gas-phase targets at cryogenic conditions.

Core claim

The central claim is that a cryogenic buffer-gas-cell-aerodynamic-lens-stack setup generates shock-frozen, dense, and controllable beams of various nanoparticles in the gas phase, including isolated proteins. Strong-field ionization combined with velocity-map imaging provides unambiguous detection and full reconstruction of the beams, including particle flux and number density. The workflow supports protein-like sample preparation and delivery for single-particle diffractive imaging, microscopy, and low-temperature nanoscience.

What carries the argument

The cryogenic buffer-gas-cell-aerodynamic-lens-stack setup, which shock-freezes nanoparticles and focuses them into dense, controllable gas-phase beams.

If this is right

  • The setup supplies gas-phase isolated proteins at controlled densities for single-particle diffractive imaging experiments.
  • Particle flux and number density can be measured directly from the imaging data for quantitative beam characterization.
  • The same workflow applies to other nanoparticles and supports low-temperature nanoscience studies.
  • Shock-freezing during buffer-gas cooling preserves fragile structures that would degrade at room temperature.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combining these beams with pulsed X-ray sources could enable time-resolved imaging of protein dynamics.
  • The method may extend to larger biomolecules or synthetic nanostructures that require cryogenic isolation.
  • Quantitative beam data could help optimize downstream detection efficiency in microscopy setups.

Load-bearing premise

The nanoparticles stay isolated and keep their protein-like character after cryogenic cooling and aerodynamic focusing, without aggregation, contamination, or fragmentation.

What would settle it

Velocity-map images showing clustered particles or fragmented molecular ions instead of intact protein-size signals would demonstrate that the beams do not deliver isolated undamaged nanoparticles.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09090 by Amit K. Samanta, Hubertus Bromberger, Jingxuan He, Jochen K\"upper, Karol D{\l}ugo{\l}ecki.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Overview of the experimental setup. Nanoparticles are delivered through a transport tube into the BGC-ALS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Typical single-shot electron VMI images obtained from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. One-dimensional histogram of the number of detected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Averaged hitrate of 20 nm polystyrene nanoparticles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. TOF-MS of various nanoparticles: (a) Polystyrene, (b) NaCl, (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report a cryogenic buffer-gas-cell-aerodynamic-lens-stack setup that enables the generation of shock-frozen, dense, and controllable beams of various nanoparticles in the gas phase, including small and low-density species such as isolated proteins. We demonstrate characterization of the setup using strong-field ionization combined with velocity-map imaging, allowing the unambiguous detection of nanoparticles in the protein-size range and full reconstruction of the particle beams including determination of particle flux and number density. The generation and characterization workflow presented here provides a valuable approach for protein-like sample preparation and delivery in single-particle diffractive imaging, microscopy, and low-temperature nanoscience.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes a cryogenic buffer-gas-cell-aerodynamic-lens-stack apparatus for producing shock-frozen, dense, controllable beams of nanoparticles including isolated proteins, with characterization via strong-field ionization and velocity-map imaging (VMI) to enable unambiguous detection in the protein-size range and full reconstruction of beam flux and number density for applications in single-particle diffractive imaging.

Significance. If the characterization holds, the work offers a potentially valuable instrumentation advance for gas-phase delivery of cryo-cooled protein-like samples, addressing isolation and cooling challenges for low-density species in nanoscience and imaging. The integrated cryogenic and lens-stack design is a constructive contribution, though its impact depends on demonstrating that detected signals correspond to intact particles.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract and characterization section: The central claim of 'unambiguous detection' of isolated proteins (or protein-like nanoparticles) in the protein-size range via strong-field ionization combined with VMI is not adequately supported. Strong-field ionization of biomolecules in this size range is known to induce Coulomb explosion and fragmentation; the resulting ion images and TOF signals can be produced by smaller fragments or clusters whose effective distributions overlap the claimed range. Without an orthogonal integrity check (such as post-selection mass spectrometry or collected-particle imaging), the VMI data alone cannot securely exclude these alternatives, weakening the assertion that the beams contain intact isolated proteins rather than aggregates or fragments.
minor comments (1)
  1. Abstract: Quantitative performance metrics (e.g., measured particle flux, number density, size distributions with uncertainties) are absent from the abstract and should be added to allow immediate assessment of the setup's capabilities.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment regarding the characterization claims below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [—] Abstract and characterization section: The central claim of 'unambiguous detection' of isolated proteins (or protein-like nanoparticles) in the protein-size range via strong-field ionization combined with VMI is not adequately supported. Strong-field ionization of biomolecules in this size range is known to induce Coulomb explosion and fragmentation; the resulting ion images and TOF signals can be produced by smaller fragments or clusters whose effective distributions overlap the claimed range. Without an orthogonal integrity check (such as post-selection mass spectrometry or collected-particle imaging), the VMI data alone cannot securely exclude these alternatives, weakening the assertion that the beams contain intact isolated proteins rather than aggregates or fragments.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's valid concern that strong-field ionization of protein-like nanoparticles can result in fragmentation and Coulomb explosion, potentially leading to signals from smaller species that overlap in the observed distributions. Our use of 'unambiguous detection' in the abstract was meant to emphasize the capability of the VMI technique to identify particles within the protein-size range through their ionization and imaging signatures, based on the controlled beam parameters and observed signal characteristics. However, we agree that without additional orthogonal verification such as mass spectrometry, the data does not conclusively prove the absence of fragments or aggregates. To address this, we will revise the abstract to remove the word 'unambiguous' and rephrase the characterization description to indicate that the method enables detection and characterization of nanoparticles in the protein-size range. We will also expand the discussion in the characterization section to include a caveat about possible fragmentation effects and suggest that future work could incorporate mass-selective detection for enhanced integrity confirmation. This ensures our claims are appropriately qualified. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental instrumentation with no derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper describes construction and performance of a cryogenic buffer-gas-cell plus aerodynamic-lens apparatus for producing beams of shock-frozen nanoparticles, including proteins. Characterization relies on strong-field ionization combined with velocity-map imaging to measure flux and density. No equations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems appear in the provided text or abstract. The central claims rest on direct experimental observation of the physical apparatus rather than any derivation chain that could reduce to its own inputs by construction or self-citation. This is the expected outcome for an instrumentation report whose results are externally falsifiable via replication of the hardware.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is experimental instrumentation development. No free parameters are fitted, no mathematical axioms are invoked, and no new physical entities are postulated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5412 in / 1138 out tokens · 60510 ms · 2026-05-10T17:22:49.759885+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Barty, J

    A. Barty, J. Küpper, and H. N. Chapman, Molecular imaging using x-ray free-electron lasers, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.64, 415 (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Ekeberg, M

    T. Ekeberg, M. Svenda, C. Abergel, F. R. N. C. Maia, V. Seltzer, J.-M. Claverie, M. Hantke, O. Jönsson, C. Net- telblad, G. van der Schot, M. Liang, D. P. Deponte, A. Barty, M. M. Seibert, B. Iwan, I. Andersson, N. D. Loh, A. V. Martin, H. Chapman, C. Bostedt, J. D. Bozek, K. R. Ferguson, J. Krzywinski, S. W. Epp, D. Rolles, A. Rudenko, R. Hartmann, N. Ki...

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    G. v. d. Schot, M. Svenda, F. R. N. C. Maia, M. Han- tke, D. P. DePonte, M. M. Seibert, A. Aquila, J. Schulz, R. Kirian, M. Liang, F. Stellato, B. Iwan, J. Andreas- son, N. Timneanu, D. Westphal, F. N. Almeida, D. Odic, D. Hasse, G. H. Carlsson, D. S. D. Larsson, A. Barty, A. V. Martin, S. Schorb, C. Bostedt, J. D. Bozek, D. Rolles, A. Rudenko, S. Epp, L....

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Sobolev, S

    E. Sobolev, S. Zolotarev, K. Giewekemeyer, J. Bielecki, K. Okamoto, H. K. N. Reddy, J. Andreasson, K. Ayyer, I. Barak, S. Bari, A. Barty, R. Bean, S. Bobkov, H. N. Chapman, G. Chojnowski, B. J. Daurer, K. Dörner, T. Ekeberg, L. Flückiger, O. Galzitskaya, L. Gelisio, S. Hauf, B. G. Hogue, D. A. Horke, A. Hosseinizadeh, V. Ilyin, C. Jung, C. Kim, Y. Kim, R....

    work page arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Ekeberg, D

    T. Ekeberg, D. Assalauova, J. Bielecki, R. Boll, B. J. Daurer, L. A. Eichacker, L. E. Franken, D. E. Galli, L. Gelisio, L. Gumprecht, L. H. Gunn, J. Hajdu, R. Hart- mann, D. Hasse, A. Ignatenko, J. Koliyadu, O. Kulyk, R. Kurta, M. Kuster, W. Lugmayr, J. Lübke, A. P. Man- cuso, T. Mazza, C. Nettelblad, Y. Ovcharenko, D. E. Rivas, M. Rose, A. K. Samanta, P....

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    P. Liu, P. J. Ziemann, D. B. Kittelson, and P. H. McMurry, Generating particle beams of controlled dimensions and divergence: I. Theory of particle motion in aerodynamic lenses and nozzle expansions, Aerosol Sci. Techn.22, 293 (1995)

    work page 1995

  7. [7]

    M. J. Bogan, S. Boutet, H. N. Chapman, S. Marchesini, A. Barty, W. H. Benner, U. Rohner, M. Frank, S. P. Hau-Riege, S. Bajt, B. Woods, M. M. Seibert, B. Iwan, N. Timneanu, J. Hajdu, and J. Schulz, Aerosol imaging with a soft x-ray free electron laser, Aerosol Sci. Techn. 44, i (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    N. Roth, S. Awel, D. A. Horke, and J. Küpper, Optimizing aerodynamic lenses for single-particle imaging, J. Aerosol. Sci.124, 17 (2018), arXiv:1712.01795 [physics]

    work page arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Worbs, N

    L. Worbs, N. Roth, J. Lübke, A. D. Estillore, P. L. Xavier, A. K. Samanta, and J. Küpper, Optimizing the geometry of aerodynamic lens injectors for single-particle coherent diffractive imaging of gold nanoparticles, J. Appl. Cryst. 54, 1730 (2021), arXiv:2105.15084v1 [physics]

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    N. Roth, D. A. Horke, J. Lübke, A. K. Samanta, A. D. Estillore, L. Worbs, N. Pohlman, K. Ayyer, A. Morgan, H. Fleckenstein, M. Domaracky, B. Erk, C. Passow, J. Cor- rea, O. Yefanov, A. Barty, S. Bajt, R. A. Kirian, H. N. Chapman, and J. Küpper, New aerodynamic lens injector for single particle diffractive imaging, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physic...

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Neutze, R

    R. Neutze, R. Wouts, D. van der Spoel, E. Weckert, and J. Hajdu, Potential for biomolecular imaging with femtosecond x-ray pulses, Nature406, 752 (2000)

    work page 2000

  12. [12]

    H. N. Chapman, C. Caleman, and N. Timneanu, Diffrac- tion before destruction, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B369, 20130313 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Ayyer, P

    K. Ayyer, P. L. Xavier, J. Bielecki, Z. Shen, B. J. Daurer, A. K. Samanta, S. Awel, R. Bean, A. Barty, M. Bergemann, T. Ekeberg, A. D. Estillore, H. Fan- gohr, K. Giewekemeyer, M. S. Hunter, M. Karnevskiy, R. A. Kirian, H. Kirkwood, Y. Kim, J. Koliyadu, H. Lange, R. Letrun, J. Lübke, T. Michelat, A. J. Mor- gan, N. Roth, T. Sato, M. Sikorski, F. Schulz, J...

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Mandl, C

    T. Mandl, C. Östlin, I. E. Dawod, M. N. Brodmerkel, E. G. Marklund, A. V. Martin, N. Timneanu, and C. Caleman, Structural heterogeneity in single particle imaging using x-ray lasers, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.11, 6077 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    K. J. Gaffney and H. N. Chapman, Imaging atomic struc- ture and dynamics with ultrafast x-ray scattering, Science 316, 1444 (2007)

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    J. Miao, T. Ishikawa, I. K. Robinson, and M. M. Mur- nane, Beyond crystallography: Diffractive imaging using coherent x-ray light sources, Science348, 530 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Breuker and F

    K. Breuker and F. W. McLafferty, Stepwise evolution of protein native structure with electrospray into the gas phase, 10-12 to 102 s, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.105, 18145–18152 (2008)

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    D. v. d. Spoel, E. G. Marklund, D. S. D. Larsson, and C. Caleman, Proteins, lipids, and water in the gas phase, Macromol. Biosci.11, 50 (2011)

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    Meyer, V

    T. Meyer, V. Gabelica, H. Grubmüller, and M. Orozco, Proteins in the gas phase, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci.3, 408 (2013)

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Singh, A

    V. Singh, A. K. Samanta, N. Roth, D. Gusa, T. Ossen- brüggen, I. Rubinsky, D. A. Horke, and J. Küpper, Opti- mized cell geometry for buffer-gas-cooled molecular-beam sources,Phys.Rev.A97,032704(2018),arXiv:1801.10586 [physics]

    work page arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    A. K. Samanta, M. Amin, A. D. Estillore, N. Roth, L. Worbs, D. A. Horke, and J. Küpper, Controlled beams of shockfrozen, isolated, biological and artificial nanopar- ticles, Struct. Dyn.7, 024304 (2020), arXiv:1910.12606 [physics]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Al-Amoudi, L

    A. Al-Amoudi, L. P. Norlen, and J. Dubochet, Cryo- electron microscopy of vitreous sections of native biologi- cal cells and tissues, J. Struct. Biol.148, 131 (2004)

    work page 2004

  23. [23]

    Worbs, J

    L. Worbs, J. Lübke, N. Roth, A. K. Samanta, D. A. Horke, and J. Küpper, Light-sheet imaging for the recording of transverse absolute density distributions of gas-phase particle-beams from nanoparticle injectors, Opt. Express 27, 36580 (2019), arXiv:1909.08922 [physics]

    work page arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    J. A. Powell, A. M. Summers, Q. Liu, S. J. Robatjazi, P. Rupp, J. Stierle, C. Trallero-Herrero, M. F. Kling, and A. Rudenko, Interplay of pulse duration, peak intensity, and particle size in laser-driven electron emission from silica nanospheres, Opt. Express27, 27124 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Davino, T

    M. Davino, T. Saule, N. G. Helming, J. A. Powell, and C. Trallero-Herrero, Characterization of an aerosolized nanoparticle beam beyond the diffraction limit through strong field ionization, Sci. Rep.12, 9277 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Zherebtsov, T

    S. Zherebtsov, T. Fennel, J. Plenge, E. Antonsson, I. Znakovskaya, A. Wirth, O. Herrwerth, F. Süßmann, C. Peltz, I. Ahmad, S. A. Trushin, V. Pervak, S. Karsch, M. J. J. Vrakking, B. Langer, C. Graf, M. I. Stock- man, F. Krausz, E. Rühl, and M. F. Kling, Controlled near-field enhanced electron acceleration from dielectric nanospheres with intense few-cycle...

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    Seiffert, S

    L. Seiffert, S. Zherebtsov, M. F. Kling, and T. Fennel, Strong-field physics with nanospheres, Adv. Phys.: X7, 2010595 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    A. T. J. B. Eppink and D. H. Parker, Velocity map imag- ing of ions and electrons using electrostatic lenses: Appli- cation in photoelectron and photofragment ion imaging of molecular oxygen, Rev. Sci. Instrum.68, 3477 (1997)

    work page 1997

  29. [29]

    S. K. Peravali, A. K. Samanta, M. Amin, P. Neumann, J. Küpper, and M. Breuer, An improved simulation methodology for nanoparticle injection through aerody- namic lens systems, Phys. Fluids37, 033380 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Worbs,Toward cryogenic beams of nanoparticles and proteins, Dissertation, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 9 Germany (2022), submitted

    L. Worbs,Toward cryogenic beams of nanoparticles and proteins, Dissertation, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 9 Germany (2022), submitted

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Welker, M

    S. Welker, M. Amin, and J. Küpper, CMInject: Python framework for the numerical simulation of nanoparticle injection pipelines, Comp. Phys. Comm.270, 108138 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    A. G. Tobin, D. W. Sedgley, T. H. Batzer, and W. R. Call, Evaluation of charcoal sorbents for helium cryopumping in fusion reactors, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A5, 101 (1987)

    work page 1987

  33. [33]

    Bromberger, D

    H. Bromberger, D. Pennicard, R. Ballabriga, S. Trippel, and J. Küpper, Timepix3: single-pixel multi-hit energy- measurement behaviour, J. Instrum.19(11), P11008

    work page

  34. [34]

    Nomerotski, S

    A.Al-Refaie, M.Johny, J.Correa, D.Pennicard, P.Svihra, A. Nomerotski, S. Trippel, and J. Küpper, PymePix: A Python library for SPIDR readout of Timepix3, J. Instrum.14(10), P10003, arXiv:1905.07999 [physics]

    work page arXiv 1905

  35. [35]

    CFEL Controlled Molecule Imaging, PymePix, Code repository, URL: https://gitlab.desy.de/CMI/ CMI-public/pymepix(2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Bromberger, C

    H. Bromberger, C. Passow, D. Pennicard, R. Boll, J. Cor- rea, L. He, M. Johny, C. Papadopoulou, A. Tul-Noor, J. Wiese, S. Trippel, B. Erk, and J. Küpper, Shot-by-shot 250 kHz 3D ion and MHz photoelectron imaging using Timepix3, J. Phys. B55, 144001 (2022), arXiv:2111.14407 [physics]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Chang, D

    Y.-P. Chang, D. A. Horke, S. Trippel, and J. Küp- per, Spatially-controlled complex molecules and their applications, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem.34, 557 (2015), arXiv:1505.05632 [physics]

    work page arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    Johny, J

    M. Johny, J. Onvlee, T. Kierspel, H. Bieker, S. Trippel, and J. Küpper, Spatial separation of pyrrole and pyrrole- water clusters, Chem. Phys. Lett.721, 149–152 (2019), arXiv:1901.05267 [physics]

    work page arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    J. He, S. K. Peravali, A. K. Samanta, and J. Küpper, Cryogenic cooling of protein-sized particle beams support- ing high-resolution structure determination by spi (2025), in preparation

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    S. K. Peravali, L. Worbs, J. He, A. D. Estillore, A. K. Samanta, P. Neumann, and M. B. J. Küpper, Aerodynamic-lens-stack injector with cryogenic cooling: Toward efficient focusing of protein-sized nanoparticles (2025), in preparation

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    S. K. Peravali,Toward realistic multiscale simulations of nanoparticle injection devices used for single parti- cle diffractive imaging, Dissertation, Helmut-Schmidt- Universität, Hamburg, Germany (2025), submitted

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    A. P. Mancuso, A. Aquila, L. Batchelor, R. J. Bean, J. Bielecki, G. Borchers, K. Doerner, K. Giewekemeyer, R. Graceffa, O. D. Kelsey, Y. Kim, H. J. Kirkwood, A. Legrand, R. Letrun, B. Manning, L. L. Morillo, M. Messerschmidt, G. Mills, S. Raabe, N. Reimers, A. Round, T. Sato, J. Schulz, C. S. Takem, M. Siko- rski, S. Stern, P. Thute, P. Vagovic, B. Weinha...

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Round, P

    A. Round, P. Aller, R. J. Bean, J. Bielecki, A. Butryn, N. Devenish, R. d. Wijn, T. Dietze, K. Doerner, F. Dall’Antonia, P. Fischer, G. Giovanetti, S. Guen- ther, H. Han, V. Hennicke, C. Kim, Y. Kim, M. Kloos, J. C. P. Koliyadu, G. Leen, R. Letrun, L. L. Morillo, A. M. Orville, T. Pakendorf, M. Ramilli, N. Reimers, P. Reinke, J. Sanchez-Weatherby, T. Sato...

    work page 2026

  44. [44]

    T. V. Yenupuri, S. Rafie-Zinedine, L. Worbs, M. Heymann, J. Schulz, J. Bielecki, and F. R. N. C. Maia, Helium- electrospray improves sample delivery in x-ray single- particle imaging experiments, Sci. Rep.14, 4401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    T. K. Esser, J. Böhning, A. Önür, D. K. Chinthapalli, L. Eriksson, M. Grabarics, P. Fremdling, A. Konijnenberg, A. Makarov, A. Botman, C. Peter, J. L. P. Benesch, C. V. Robinson, J. Gault, L. Baker, T. A. M. Bharat, and S. Rauschenbach, Cryo-EM of soft-landedβ-galactosidase: Gas-phase and native structures are remarkably similar, Sci. Adv.10, eadl4628 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Schmale, P

    J. Schmale, P. Zieger, and A. M. L. Ekman, Aerosols in current and future arctic climate, Nat. Clim. Change11, 95 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    S. Lai, O. Sublemontier, E. Aubry, Y. Rousseau, A. Bil- lard, and P. Briois, Aerosol-based functional nanocompos- ite coating process for large surface areas, Sci. Rep.13, 4709 (2023)

    work page 2023