pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09156 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 💻 cs.RO · math.DS

On the Terminology and Geometric Aspects of Redundant Parallel Manipulators

Andreas Mueller This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO math.DS
keywords parallel kinematics machinesactuation redundancykinematic redundancyconfiguration spacedegree of actuationsingularitiesredundant manipulatorscontrol vector fields
0
0 comments X

The pith

Modeling parallel robot dynamics on the configuration space defines a degree of actuation that classifies actuation redundancy by its relation to the robot's degrees of freedom.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes a consistent terminology for redundant parallel kinematics machines by focusing on their configuration space as the central geometric object. It recalls the concept of kinematic redundancy and distinguishes between c-space, output, and input singularities, noting that redundant actuation can geometrically avoid the latter. A non-linear control system is introduced whose state evolves on the configuration space, allowing the degree of actuation to be defined as the number of independent control vector fields. PKM are then classified as full-actuated or underactuated, and actuation redundancy is classified by relating this degree to the robot's degree of freedom, providing a unified framework that resolves varying classifications in the literature.

Core claim

The central discovery is that by introducing a kinematic model with the configuration space as its core and defining a non-linear control system on it, the degree of actuation can be introduced as the number of independent control vector fields. This allows parallel kinematics machines to be classified as full-actuated and underactuated according to the relation of this degree to the degree of freedom, which in turn provides a consistent classification of actuation redundancy while emphasizing the geometric role of singularities that can be avoided through redundant actuation.

What carries the argument

The non-linear control system evolving on the configuration space, with the degree of actuation given by the number of independent control vector fields.

If this is right

  • Actuation schemes for parallel kinematics machines can be distinguished in a systematic manner.
  • Input singularities are shown to be avoidable by appropriate redundant actuation schemes.
  • Existing inconsistencies in the classification of redundant parallel manipulators in the literature are resolved.
  • The distinction between kinematic and actuation redundancy is clarified for general cases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach may enable more reliable path planning algorithms that explicitly avoid singular configurations in redundant systems.
  • Control design for underactuated parallel robots could benefit from the vector field perspective on the configuration space.
  • Future work might test the classification on a wide range of existing parallel manipulator designs to confirm its generality.

Load-bearing premise

The non-linear control system on the configuration space and the geometric distinction of singularities provide a complete and contradiction-free foundation for the proposed terminology.

What would settle it

A counterexample would be a specific redundant parallel manipulator for which the degree of actuation to degree of freedom relation leads to a classification that contradicts the observed behavior or existing literature without resolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09156 by Andreas Mueller.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Geometric interpretation of the PKM control system. The operation modes refer to input space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: 5-bar mechanism a), and its redundant extension b) the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: q 1 -q 2 -q 4 c-space section of the 5-bar mechanism. is only ensured in regular configurations. The submanifolds of regular points constitute modes of operation of the PKM. In this regard only those are relevant that can be attained by a motion starting from the initial assembly, but not those that could be attained by opening kinematic loops and assembling it differently. Definition 4. The connected subv… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A 2 DOF manipulator in different actuation modes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: 3URU DYMO PKM in its planar operation mode a), c-space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Parallel kinematics machines (PKM) can exhibit kinematic as well as actuation redundancy. While the meaning of kinematic redundancy has been clarified already for serial manipulators, actuation redundancy, that is only possible in PKM, is differently classified in the literature. In this paper a consistent terminology for general redundant PKM is proposed. A kinematic model is introduced with the configuration space (c-space) as central part. The notion of kinematic redundancy is recalled for PKM. C-space, output, and input singularities are distinguished. The significance of the c-space geometry is emphasized, and it is pointed out geometrically that input singularities can be avoided by redundant actuation schemes. In order to distinguish different actuation schemes of PKM a non-linear control system is introduced whose dynamics evolves on the c-space. The degree of actuation (DOA) is introduced as the number of independent control vector fields, and PKM are classified as full-actuated and underactuated. Relating this DOA to the degree of freedom (DOF) allows to classify the actuation redundancy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a consistent terminology for redundant parallel kinematics machines (PKM) by introducing a kinematic model with the configuration space (c-space) as its central element. It recalls the notion of kinematic redundancy, geometrically distinguishes c-space, output, and input singularities, and emphasizes that input singularities can be avoided via redundant actuation. A non-linear control system is defined whose dynamics evolve on the c-space; the degree of actuation (DOA) is introduced as the number of independent control vector fields. Relating DOA to the degree of freedom (DOF) is then used to classify PKM as full-actuated or underactuated and to categorize types of actuation redundancy, with the goal of resolving inconsistencies in the literature.

Significance. If the framework holds, the work supplies a differential-geometric and control-theoretic foundation for actuation-redundancy terminology in PKM, explicitly linking redundant actuation to the avoidance of input singularities and grounding classification in the rank of the control distribution on c-space. This could unify disparate existing schemes. The paper receives credit for its clear geometric distinction of singularity types and for framing the problem in terms of a control system on the configuration manifold rather than ad-hoc parameter counts.

major comments (2)
  1. [non-linear control system introduction] The section introducing the non-linear control system on the c-space: the central claim that DOA (defined as the number of independent control vector fields) together with its relation to DOF yields a consistent classification of actuation redundancy is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit construction of the control vector fields, no rank computation, and no mapping for any concrete PKM (e.g., a redundantly actuated 3-RRR planar manipulator or a 6-DOF Stewart-platform variant). Without such grounding it is impossible to verify that the scheme reproduces known behaviors or avoids hidden assumptions such as constant rank of the control distribution.
  2. [classification via DOA-DOF relation] The paragraph relating DOA to DOF for classification of actuation redundancy: the assertion that this relation resolves terminological inconsistencies rests on the unvalidated control-system model; the absence of even one worked example leaves open whether the geometric distinction of input singularities and the DOA definition actually improve upon or merely rephrase prior classifications.
minor comments (1)
  1. [abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a short comparison table or sentence contrasting the proposed DOA with existing metrics (e.g., degree of actuation redundancy) used in the cited literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to include a concrete worked example that grounds the framework.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The section introducing the non-linear control system on the c-space: the central claim that DOA (defined as the number of independent control vector fields) together with its relation to DOF yields a consistent classification of actuation redundancy is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit construction of the control vector fields, no rank computation, and no mapping for any concrete PKM (e.g., a redundantly actuated 3-RRR planar manipulator or a 6-DOF Stewart-platform variant). Without such grounding it is impossible to verify that the scheme reproduces known behaviors or avoids hidden assumptions such as constant rank of the control distribution.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit example is needed for verification. The manuscript develops the general differential-geometric framework with the c-space as the central element, but to address this concern we will add a detailed worked example for a redundantly actuated 3-RRR planar manipulator in the revised version. This will provide the explicit construction of the control vector fields, the rank computation to obtain the DOA, and the mapping showing how redundant actuation avoids input singularities while maintaining constant rank in the operating domain. The example will confirm reproduction of known behaviors for this system. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The paragraph relating DOA to DOF for classification of actuation redundancy: the assertion that this relation resolves terminological inconsistencies rests on the unvalidated control-system model; the absence of even one worked example leaves open whether the geometric distinction of input singularities and the DOA definition actually improve upon or merely rephrase prior classifications.

    Authors: The classification follows directly from the rank of the control distribution on the c-space and its relation to the DOF, which supplies a geometric criterion for distinguishing actuation schemes and linking redundant actuation to input-singularity avoidance. The addition of the 3-RRR example described above will demonstrate concretely how this relation resolves inconsistencies in the literature by reproducing established redundancy types while clarifying cases that prior parameter-counting schemes left ambiguous. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: terminology and classification derive from explicitly introduced c-space model and control system definitions

full rationale

The paper builds its proposed terminology by first recalling kinematic redundancy for PKM, introducing a kinematic model with c-space as central element, distinguishing c-space/output/input singularities geometrically, and then defining a non-linear control system whose dynamics evolve on the c-space. DOA is introduced directly as the number of independent control vector fields, after which relating DOA to DOF yields the full-actuated/underactuated and redundancy classifications. This chain is self-contained and definitional rather than reductive; no equation or claim reduces by construction to fitted inputs, prior self-citations, or renamed empirical patterns, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled via self-reference. The derivation stands on the newly posited control-system foundation without internal collapse to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard kinematic modeling assumptions in robotics and introduces the DOA concept without independent empirical grounding.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The configuration space serves as the central part of the kinematic model for PKM.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the foundation for distinguishing singularities and control.
  • domain assumption Input singularities can be avoided by redundant actuation schemes.
    Presented as a geometric consequence of the c-space model.
invented entities (1)
  • Degree of Actuation (DOA) no independent evidence
    purpose: To quantify independent control vector fields and classify PKM as full-actuated or underactuated.
    Newly defined in the abstract as the basis for relating to DOF and classifying actuation redundancy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5470 in / 1339 out tokens · 31722 ms · 2026-05-10T17:52:54.634074+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abedinnasab, G.R

    M.H. Abedinnasab, G.R. V ossoughi: Analysis of a 6- DOF redundantly actuated 4-legged parallel mecha- nism, Nonlinear Dyn, V ol. 58, 2009, pp. 611-622

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Amirouche: Fundamentals of Multibody Dynamics, Birkh¨auser, Boston, 2006

    F. Amirouche: Fundamentals of Multibody Dynamics, Birkh¨auser, Boston, 2006

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    Borrel, A

    P. Borrel, A. Liegeois: A study of multiple manipula- tor inverse kinematic solutions with applications to tra- jectory planning and workspace determination, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Aut. (ICRA), April 7-10, 1986, San Francisco, CA, pp. 1180-1185

    work page 1986

  4. [4]

    Burdick: On the inverse kinematics of redundant manipulators: characterization of the self-motion mani- folds, Proc

    J.W. Burdick: On the inverse kinematics of redundant manipulators: characterization of the self-motion mani- folds, Proc. IEEE Conf. Rob. Aut. (ICRA), May 14-19, 1989, Scottsdale, AZ, V ol. 1, pp. 264-270

    work page 1989

  5. [5]

    Bullo, A.D

    F. Bullo, A.D. Lewis: Geometric Control of Mechani- cal Systems, Springer, 2005

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    Buttolo, B

    P. Buttolo, B. Hannaford: Advantages of Actuation Redundancy for the Design of Haptic Displays, Proc. ASME, Fourth Annual Symposium on Haptic Inter- faces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Sys- tems, San Francisco, 2005, SDC-V ol. 57-2, pp. 623- 630

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    Chakarov: Study of the antagonistic stiffness of par- allel manipulators with actuation redundancy, Mech

    D. Chakarov: Study of the antagonistic stiffness of par- allel manipulators with actuation redundancy, Mech. Mach. Theory, V ol. 39, 2004, pp. 583-601

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Chirikjian: Hyper-redundant manipulator dynam- ics: a continuum approximation, Advanced Robotics, V ol

    G.S. Chirikjian: Hyper-redundant manipulator dynam- ics: a continuum approximation, Advanced Robotics, V ol. 9, No. 3, 1995, pp. 217-243

    work page 1995

  9. [9]

    Chablat, P

    D. Chablat, P. Wenger: Working Modes and Aspects in Fully-Parallel Manipulator, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Aut. (ICRA), May 16-20, 1998, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 1970-1976

    work page 1998

  10. [10]

    Chablat, G

    D. Chablat, G. Moroz, P. Wenger: Uniqueness domains and non singular assembly mode changing trajectories, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Aut. (ICRA),, May 9-13, 2011, Shanghai, China, pp. 3946-3951

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    Cheng, Y .-K

    H. Cheng, Y .-K. Yiu, Z. Li: Dynamics and Con- trol of Redundantly Actuated Parallel Manipulators, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, V ol. 8, No. 4, 2003, pp. 483-491

    work page 2003

  12. [12]

    Conkur, R

    E.S. Conkur, R. Buckingham: Clarifying the definition of redundancy as used in robotics, Robotica, V ol. 15, 1997, pp. 583-586

    work page 1997

  13. [13]

    Dasgupta, T.S

    B. Dasgupta, T.S. Mruthyunjaya: Force redundancy in parallel maipulators: theoretical and practical issues, Mech. Mach. Theory, V ol. 33, No. 6, 1998, pp. 727- 742

    work page 1998

  14. [14]

    Ebrahimi, J.A

    I. Ebrahimi, J.A. Carretero, R. Boudreau: Kinematic analysis and path planning of a new kinematically re- dundant planar parallel manipulator, Robotica, V ol. 26, 2008, pp 405-413

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    Ecorchard, R

    G. Ecorchard, R. Neugebauer, P. Maurine: Elasto- geometrical modeling and calibration of redundantly actuated PKMs, Mech. Mach. Theory, V ol. 45, 2010, pp. 795-810

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    Firmani, R.P

    F. Firmani, R.P. Podhorodeski: Force-unconstrained poses for a redundantly-actuated planar parallel manip- ulator, Mech. Mach. Theory, V ol. 39, 2004, pp. 459-476

    work page 2004

  17. [17]

    Gardner, V

    J.F. Gardner, V . Kumar, J.H. Ho: Kinematics and Con- trol of Redundantly Actuated Closed Chains, Proc. IEEE Conf. Rob. Aut. (ICRA), May 14-19, 1989, Scottsdale, AZ, V ol. 1, pp. 418-424

    work page 1989

  18. [18]

    Gogu: Fully-isotropic redundantly-actuated parallel wrists with three degrees of freedom, ASME DETC, Las Vegas, NV , Sep

    G. Gogu: Fully-isotropic redundantly-actuated parallel wrists with three degrees of freedom, ASME DETC, Las Vegas, NV , Sep. 4-7, 2007, DETC2007-34237

    work page 2007

  19. [19]

    C. M. Gosselin, J. Angeles: Singular analysis of closed- loop kinematic chains, Proc. IEEE Trans. Rob. Aut. (ICRA), V ol. 6, No. 3, 1990, pp. 281-290

    work page 1990

  20. [20]

    Hufnagel, D

    T. Hufnagel, D. Schramm: Consequences of the Use of Decentralized Controllers for Redundantly Actuated Parallel Manipulators, 13th World Congress in Mecha- nism and Machine Science, Guanajuato, Mexico, 19-25 June 2011

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    Jain, S.N

    S. Jain, S.N. Kramer: Forward and inverse kinematics solution of the variable geometry truss robot based on N-celled tetrahedron-tetrahedron truss, ASME J. Mech. Design, V ol. 112, No. 1, 1990, pp. 16-22

    work page 1990

  22. [22]

    Jeong, D

    J. Jeong, D. Kang, Y .M. Cho, J. Kim: Kinematic Calibration for Redundantly Actuated Parallel Mech- anisms, ASME J. Mech. Design, V ol. 126, No. 2, 2004, pp. 307-318

    work page 2004

  23. [23]

    Jung, C.D

    H.K. Jung, C.D. Crane, R.G. Roberts: Stiffness map- ping of planar compliant parallel mechanisms in a serial arrangement, Advances in Robot Kinematics (ARK), June 26-29, 2006, Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp. 85-94

    work page 2006

  24. [24]

    Thanh, J

    T.D. Thanh, J. Kotlarski, B. Heimann, T. Ortmaier: On the Inverse Dynamics Problem of General Paral- lel Robots, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Mechatronics (CIM), Malaga, Spain, April 14-17, 2009, pp.1-68

    work page 2009

  25. [25]

    Guillemin, A

    V . Guillemin, A. Pollack: Differential Topology, Pren- tice Hall, New Jersey, 1974

    work page 1974

  26. [26]

    Kim et al: Design and Analysis of a Redundantly Ac- tuated Parallel Mechanism for Rapid Machining, IEEE Trans

    J. Kim et al: Design and Analysis of a Redundantly Ac- tuated Parallel Mechanism for Rapid Machining, IEEE Trans. Rob. Aut., V ol. 17, No. 4, 2001, pp. 423-434

    work page 2001

  27. [27]

    S. Kock, W. Schumacher: A parallel x-y manipulator with actuation redundancy for high-speed and active- stiffness applications, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Au- tom. (ICRA), Leuven, 1998, pp. 2295-2300

    work page 1998

  28. [28]

    S. Kock, W. Schumacher: Redundant Parallel Kine- matic Structures and Their Control, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics (STAR), V ol. 67, 2011, pp. 143- 157

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    Kurtz, V

    R. Kurtz, V . Hayward: Multiple-goal kinematic opti- mization of a parallel spherical mechanism with actua- tor redundancy, IEEE Trans. Rob. Aut., V ol. 8. No. 5, 1992, pp. 644-651

    work page 1992

  30. [30]

    Y .H. Lee, Y . Han, C.C. Iuras, F.C. Park: Simulation- Based Actuator Selection for Redundantly Actuated Robot Mechanisms, J. Rob. Systems, V ol. 19, No. 8, 2002, pp. 379-390

    work page 2002

  31. [31]

    Lee, B.J

    H. Lee, B.J. Yi, S.R. Oh, I.H. Suh: Optimal design of a five-bar finger with redundant actuation, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Aut. (ICRA), Leuven, 1998, pp. 2068- 2074

    work page 1998

  32. [32]

    H. Liao, T. Li, Y . Tang: Singularity analysis of redun- dant parallel manipulators, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Syst., Man and Cybernetics, Oct. 10-13, 2004, pp. 4214-4220

    work page 2004

  33. [33]

    G. Liu, Y . Lou, Z. Li: Singularities of Parallel Manip- ulators: A geometric Treatment, IEEE Trans. Rob. V ol. 19, No. 4, 2003, pp 579-594

    work page 2003

  34. [34]

    Merlet: Redundant Parallel Manipulators, J

    J.P. Merlet: Redundant Parallel Manipulators, J. Labo- ratory Rob. and Aut., V ol. 8, 1996, pp. 17-24

    work page 1996

  35. [35]

    Miura, H

    K. Miura, H. Furuya: Variable geometry truss and its application to deployable truss and space crane arms, Acta Astronautica, V ol. 12, No. 7-8, 1985, pp. 599-607

    work page 1985

  36. [36]

    M ¨uller: Internal Prestress Control of redundantly ac- tuated Parallel Manipulators - Its Application to Back- lash avoiding Control, IEEE Trans

    A. M ¨uller: Internal Prestress Control of redundantly ac- tuated Parallel Manipulators - Its Application to Back- lash avoiding Control, IEEE Trans. Rob., V ol. 21, No. 4, 2005, pp. 668-677

    work page 2005

  37. [37]

    M ¨uller: Stiffness Control of redundantly actuated Parallel Manipulators, Proc

    A. M ¨uller: Stiffness Control of redundantly actuated Parallel Manipulators, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Aut. (ICRA), 2006, pp. 1153-1158

    work page 2006

  38. [38]

    M ¨uller, J.M

    A. M ¨uller, J.M. Rico: Mobility and Higher Order Lo- cal Analysis of the Configuration Space of Single-Loop Mechanisms, in: J. J. Lenarcic, P. Wenger (eds.), Ad- vances in Robot Kinematics, 2008, Springer, pp. 215- 224

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    M ¨uller: Generic Mobility of Rigid Body Mecha- nisms, Mechanism and Machine Theory, V ol

    A. M ¨uller: Generic Mobility of Rigid Body Mecha- nisms, Mechanism and Machine Theory, V ol. 44, No. 6, 2009, pp. 1240-1255

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    M ¨uller: Consequences of Geometric Imperfections for the Control of Redundantly Actuated Parallel Ma- nipulators, IEEE Trans

    A. M ¨uller: Consequences of Geometric Imperfections for the Control of Redundantly Actuated Parallel Ma- nipulators, IEEE Trans. Robotics, V ol. 26, No. 1, 2010, pp. 21-31

    work page 2010

  41. [41]

    M ¨uller, T

    A. M ¨uller, T. Hufnagel: A Projection Method for the Elimination of Contradicting Control Forces in Redun- dantly Actuated PKM, IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Automat. (ICRA), May 9-13, 2011, Shanghai, China, pp. 3218- 3223

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    M ¨uller: A Robust Inverse Dynamics Formulation for Redundantly Actuated PKM, 13th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, Guanajuato, Mex- ico, June 19-25, 2011

    A. M ¨uller: A Robust Inverse Dynamics Formulation for Redundantly Actuated PKM, 13th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, Guanajuato, Mex- ico, June 19-25, 2011

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    Murray, Z

    R.M. Murray, Z. Li, S.S. Sastry: A mathematical Intro- duction to robotic Manipulation, CRC Press, 1993

    work page 1993

  44. [44]

    Nahon, J

    M.A. Nahon, J. Angeles: Force optimization in redundantly-actuated closed kinematic chains, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Aut. (ICRA), Scottsdale, AZ, May 15-19, 1989, 951-956

    work page 1989

  45. [45]

    Nakamura, M

    Y . Nakamura, M. Ghodoussi: Dynamics Computation of Closed-Link Robot Mechanisms with Nonredundant and Redundant Actuators, IEEE Tran. Rob. and Aut., V ol. 5, No. 3, 1989, pp. 294-302

    work page 1989

  46. [46]

    Nikravesh, M

    P.E. Nikravesh, M. Skinivasan: Generalized Co- Ordinate Partitioning in Static Equilibrium Analysis of Large-Scale Mechanical Systems, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., V ol. 21, 1985, pp. 451-464

    work page 1985

  47. [47]

    Nijmeijer, A.J

    H. Nijmeijer, A.J. van der Schaft, Nonlinear dynamical control systems, Springer, 1990

    work page 1990

  48. [48]

    Nokleby et al.: Force capabilities of redundantly- actuated parallel mechanisms, Mech

    S.B. Nokleby et al.: Force capabilities of redundantly- actuated parallel mechanisms, Mech. Mach. Theory, V ol. 40, 2005, pp. 578-599

    work page 2005

  49. [49]

    O’Brien, J.T

    J.F. O’Brien, J.T. Wen: Redundant actuation for im- proving kinematic manipulability, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Aut. (ICRA), May 10-15, Detroid, MI, 1999, pp. 1520-1525

    work page 1999

  50. [50]

    Padmanabhan, V

    B. Padmanabhan, V . Arun, C. F. Reinholtz: Closed- form inverse kinematic analysis of variable-geometry truss manipulator, ASME J. Mech. Design, V ol. 114, No. 3, 1992, pp. 438-443

    work page 1992

  51. [51]

    Park, J.W

    F.C. Park, J.W. Kim: Manipulability of closed kine- matic chains, ASME J. Mech. Des., V ol. 120, No. 4, 1998, pp. 542-548

    work page 1998

  52. [52]

    Reinholz, D

    C. Reinholz, D. Gokhale: Design and analysis of vari- able geometry truss robot, Proc. 9th Applied Mecha- nisms Conf., Oklahoma, 1987, pp. 1-5

    work page 1987

  53. [53]

    Saglia, N.G

    J. Saglia, N.G. Tsagarakis, J.S. Dai, D.G. Caldwell: A High-performance Redundantly Actuated Parallel Mechanism for Ankle Rehabilitation, Int. J. Robotics Research, V ol. 28, No. 9, 2009, pp. 1216-1227

    work page 2009

  54. [54]

    Seguchi, M

    Y . Seguchi, M. Tanaka, T. Yamaguchi, Y . Sasabe, H. Tsuji: Dynamic Analysis of a Truss-Type Flexible Robot Arm, JSME Int. Journal, V ol. 33, No. 2, pp. 183- 190, 1990

    work page 1990

  55. [55]

    Tsai: Robot Analysis: The Mechanics of Serial and Parallel Manipulators, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999

    L.W. Tsai: Robot Analysis: The Mechanics of Serial and Parallel Manipulators, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999

    work page 1999

  56. [56]

    H. Shin, S. Lee, W. In, J.I. Jeong, J. Kim: Kine- matic Optimization of a Redundantly Actuated Parallel Mechanism for Maximizing Stiffness and Workspace Using Taguchi Method, J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam. V ol. 6, 2011

    work page 2011

  57. [57]

    B.Y . Yi, R.A. Freeman, D. Tesar: Open-loop stiff- ness control of overconstrained mechanisms/robot link- age systems, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Aut. (ICRA), Scottsdale, AZ, May 15-19, 1989, pp. 1340-1345

    work page 1989

  58. [58]

    Y .K. Yiu, J. Meng, Z.X. Li: Auto-Calibration for a Par- allel Manipulator with Sensor Redundancy, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Automat. (ICRA), Sept. 14-19, 2003, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 3660-3665

    work page 2003

  59. [59]

    Yoshikawa: Manipulability of Robotic Mechanisms, Int

    T. Yoshikawa: Manipulability of Robotic Mechanisms, Int. J. Robotic Research, V ol. 4, No. 2, 1985, pp. 3-9

    work page 1985

  60. [60]

    Wang, et al.: An Experimental Study of a Redun- dantly Actuated Parallel Manipulator for a 5-DOF Hy- brid Machine Tool, IEEE/ASME Trans

    L. Wang, et al.: An Experimental Study of a Redun- dantly Actuated Parallel Manipulator for a 5-DOF Hy- brid Machine Tool, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, V ol. 14, No. 1, 2009, pp. 72-81

    work page 2009

  61. [61]

    Wang, et al.: Workspace and singularity analysis of a 3-DOF planar parallel manipulator with actuation re- dundancy

    J. Wang, et al.: Workspace and singularity analysis of a 3-DOF planar parallel manipulator with actuation re- dundancy. Robotica, V ol. 27, 2009, pp 51-57

    work page 2009

  62. [62]

    Wenger: Cuspidal and noncuspidal robot manipula- tors, Robotica, V ol

    P. Wenger: Cuspidal and noncuspidal robot manipula- tors, Robotica, V ol. 25, 2007, pp 677–689

    work page 2007

  63. [63]

    Wohlhart: Kinematotropic Linkages, in: J

    K. Wohlhart: Kinematotropic Linkages, in: J. Lenarcic, V . Parent-Castelli (eds.): Recent Advances in Robot Kinematics, Kluwer, 1996, pp. 359-368

    work page 1996

  64. [64]

    Zhang, et al.: Singularity elimination of parallel mechanisms by means of redundant actuation, 12th IFToMM World Congress, Besancon, France, 2007

    Y . Zhang, et al.: Singularity elimination of parallel mechanisms by means of redundant actuation, 12th IFToMM World Congress, Besancon, France, 2007

    work page 2007

  65. [65]

    Zhang, S

    Y .X. Zhang, S. Cong, W.W. Shang, Z.X. Li, S.L. Jiang: Modeling, Identification and Control of a Redundant Planar 2-DOF Parallel Manipulator, Int. J. Control, Au- tomation, and Systems, V ol. 5, No. 5, 2007, pp. 559- 569

    work page 2007

  66. [66]

    Y . Zhao, F. Gao: Dynamic performance comparison of the 8PSS redundant parallel manipulator and its non- redundant counterpart the 6PSS parallel manipulator, Mech. Mach. Theory, V ol. 44, No. 5, 2009, pp: 991- 1008

    work page 2009

  67. [67]

    Y . Zhao, F. Gao: The joint velocity, torque, and power capability evaluation of a redundant parallel manipula- tor, Robotica, V ol. 29, 2011, pp 483-493

    work page 2011

  68. [68]

    Zlatanov, R.G

    D. Zlatanov, R.G. Fenton, B. Benhabib: Identifica- tion and classification of the singular configurations of mechanisms, Mech. Mach. Theory, 1998, 743-760

    work page 1998

  69. [69]

    Zlatanov, I.A

    D. Zlatanov, I.A. Bonev, C.M. Gosselin: Constraint Singularities as C-Space Singularities, 8th International Symposium on Advances in Robot Kinematics (ARK 2002), Caldes de Malavella, Spain, June 24-28, 2002

    work page 2002