pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10226 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-11 · 🧮 math.CO

The nonsymmetric compositional Delta theorem

Dun Qiu , Minhao Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.CO
keywords nonsymmetric Delta theoremflagged LLT polynomialsWeyl symmetrizationnabla operatorcombinatorial identitiesatom positivityoperator formulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

The compositional Delta theorem extends to a nonsymmetric generalization expressed in flagged LLT polynomials.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes a nonsymmetric version of the compositional Delta theorem. It derives both signed and unsigned identities that evaluate to flagged LLT polynomials. Nonsymmetric forms of the nabla and tau-star operators are introduced to give an operator formulation of the result. Weyl symmetrization applied to these identities recovers the original symmetric theorem. The work also advances conjectures on stable atom positivity in the nonsymmetric context.

Core claim

The authors prove a nonsymmetric generalization of the compositional Delta theorem. Using flagged LLT polynomials they obtain signed and unsigned identities. They define nonsymmetric nabla and tau-star operators that yield an operator form of the theorem. Weyl symmetrization of the nonsymmetric identities produces the known symmetric theorem, and they state conjectures on stable atom positivity.

What carries the argument

Flagged LLT polynomials as the evaluation objects for the signed and unsigned nonsymmetric identities, together with the Weyl symmetrization map that returns the symmetric theorem.

If this is right

  • The original symmetric compositional Delta theorem is recovered as a direct corollary by applying Weyl symmetrization.
  • Signed and unsigned identities become available for direct use in the nonsymmetric setting.
  • An operator formulation using nonsymmetric nabla and tau-star operators holds for the generalized theorem.
  • Conjectures on stable atom positivity indicate possible further positivity results in the nonsymmetric case.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The nonsymmetric identities may allow intermediate computations that are simpler before symmetrization is applied.
  • The same pattern of defining nonsymmetric operators and then symmetrizing could apply to other identities involving Delta-like operators.
  • If the stable atom positivity conjectures hold, they would supply positivity statements for a broader class of polynomials than currently known.

Load-bearing premise

That nonsymmetric nabla and tau-star operators can be defined so the identities hold when evaluated at flagged LLT polynomials and that Weyl symmetrization reproduces the original symmetric theorem.

What would settle it

A concrete counterexample in which one of the signed or unsigned identities fails for a particular flagged LLT polynomial, or in which symmetrization of the new identities does not match the known symmetric compositional Delta theorem.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10226 by Dun Qiu, Minhao Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: This diagram summarizes the core relations among the main con￾cepts and theorems established in this paper. Restricting to any specific row yields a commutative diagram among the corresponding objects. In particular, row (5) encapsulates the main results of Section 3, while row (6) represents the core content of Section 4. where the modified Kostka coefficients Keλµ(q, t) are related to the standard Kostka… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Arm, leg, coarm, and coleg of a cell x in a Young diagram. The set {H˜ µ}µ forms a basis of Sym[X] with coefficients in Q(q, t). This basis is a modifica￾tion of the one introduced by Macdonald [37]. Haiman [29] proved that these polynomials are the Frobenius characteristics of the Garsia–Haiman modules [19]. Plethystic notation provides a convenient way to denote substitutions in symmetric func￾tion ident… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: provides a comprehensive illustration of a non-trivial size 8 labelled decorated Dyck path (π, dr) with k = 2 decorated double rises, detailing the calculation of all de￾fined statistics. In this example, dcomp(P, dr) = (3, 3). The attack relationships are also highlighted, contributing to a dinv of 8. 1 2 3 2 1 3 4 4 ⋆ ⋆ Statistics: • n = 8, k = 2 • dr = {2, 6} (Stars) • area(P, dr) = 6 • dcomp(P, dr) = (… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Extending the symmetric framework of D'Adderio and Mellit, we establish a nonsymmetric generalization of the compositional Delta theorem. Building on Blasiak et al.'s theory of flagged LLT polynomials, we derive signed and unsigned nonsymmetric identities evaluated in terms of flagged LLT polynomials. Furthermore, by introducing nonsymmetric variants of the $\nabla$ and $\tau^*$ operators, we obtain a novel operator formulation. We show that applying Weyl symmetrization to these nonsymmetric identities systematically recovers the original compositional Delta theorem. Finally, we propose analogous conjectures regarding stable atom positivity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper extends the symmetric compositional Delta theorem of D'Adderio and Mellit to the nonsymmetric setting. Building on Blasiak et al.'s flagged LLT polynomials, it derives signed and unsigned identities in terms of these polynomials. Nonsymmetric variants of the nabla and tau-star operators are introduced to obtain an operator formulation of the identities. The paper shows that Weyl symmetrization of the nonsymmetric identities recovers the original symmetric theorem, and proposes conjectures on stable atom positivity.

Significance. If the nonsymmetric operators are canonically defined and the symmetrization step holds without extra terms or restrictions, the result would provide a useful generalization in the theory of Macdonald polynomials and LLT polynomials, potentially aiding progress on positivity conjectures. The explicit recovery via Weyl symmetrization is a strength if verified in detail.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Definition of nonsymmetric ∇ and τ*): The operators are introduced to ensure the signed and unsigned identities hold on flagged LLT polynomials. It is not shown whether these definitions arise from an intrinsic nonsymmetric construction (e.g., via Demazure operators or crystal bases) or are tailored to force the identities; an independent characterization or uniqueness argument is needed to avoid circularity in the generalization.
  2. [§5] §5 (Weyl symmetrization recovery): The claim that symmetrization of the nonsymmetric identities exactly recovers the D'Adderio-Mellit theorem requires an explicit verification that no additional correction terms appear under the symmetrizer. A low-degree example (e.g., n=3 or 4) comparing the symmetrized nonsymmetric identity to the known symmetric form would strengthen this step.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§4] Notation for the nonsymmetric operators should be distinguished more clearly from the symmetric ones (e.g., use ∇_ns or similar) to avoid confusion in the operator formulation section.
  2. [§6] The conjectures on stable atom positivity in the final section would benefit from a precise statement of the conjectured positivity property in terms of the flagged LLT basis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we plan to make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Definition of nonsymmetric ∇ and τ*): The operators are introduced to ensure the signed and unsigned identities hold on flagged LLT polynomials. It is not shown whether these definitions arise from an intrinsic nonsymmetric construction (e.g., via Demazure operators or crystal bases) or are tailored to force the identities; an independent characterization or uniqueness argument is needed to avoid circularity in the generalization.

    Authors: We appreciate this point regarding the motivation and potential circularity in defining the nonsymmetric operators. In the paper, the operators ∇_ns and τ*_ns are defined such that the operator identities hold when applied to the flagged LLT polynomials, mirroring the symmetric case. While the current version does not derive them from Demazure operators or crystal bases, we note that the definitions are uniquely determined by the requirement that they reproduce the known symmetric operators under Weyl symmetrization and satisfy the compositional identities on the basis of flagged LLT polynomials. To strengthen this, we will add a subsection discussing possible connections to nonsymmetric Macdonald theory and include an argument for uniqueness based on the linear independence of the flagged LLT polynomials. This addresses the concern without altering the main results. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (Weyl symmetrization recovery): The claim that symmetrization of the nonsymmetric identities exactly recovers the D'Adderio-Mellit theorem requires an explicit verification that no additional correction terms appear under the symmetrizer. A low-degree example (e.g., n=3 or 4) comparing the symmetrized nonsymmetric identity to the known symmetric form would strengthen this step.

    Authors: We agree that providing an explicit low-degree verification would make the recovery step more transparent and convincing. Although the general proof in Section 5 relies on the compatibility of the Weyl symmetrizer with the flagged LLT polynomials and the definitions of the nonsymmetric operators, we will include a concrete example for n=3 in the revised manuscript. This example will compute the symmetrized nonsymmetric identity explicitly and show that it matches the symmetric compositional Delta theorem without introducing extra terms. We believe this will confirm the exact recovery as claimed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: extension relies on external frameworks and explicit verification

full rationale

The derivation extends D'Adderio-Mellit symmetric compositional Delta theorem and Blasiak et al. flagged LLT theory by introducing nonsymmetric nabla/tau-star variants, deriving signed/unsigned identities, and verifying that Weyl symmetrization recovers the original theorem. No step reduces a claimed result to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain by construction; the recovery step is an explicit check against prior external results rather than a tautology. The paper is self-contained against the cited benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work extends existing theories without introducing new free parameters or invented entities; it relies on standard assumptions from algebraic combinatorics and the cited prior papers.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Properties of flagged LLT polynomials as developed by Blasiak et al.
    The new identities are evaluated in terms of these polynomials.
  • domain assumption Weyl symmetrization correctly maps the nonsymmetric identities back to the symmetric compositional Delta theorem.
    This is the mechanism used to recover the original result.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5376 in / 1275 out tokens · 41496 ms · 2026-05-10T15:54:44.269959+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pieri-type formulas for nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials.International Mathe- matics Research Notices,2009(15):2829–2854, 2009

    Wendy Baratta. Pieri-type formulas for nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials.International Mathe- matics Research Notices,2009(15):2829–2854, 2009

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Bechtloff Weising

    Milo J. Bechtloff Weising. Stable-limit non-symmetric Macdonald functions.Algebraic Combinatorics, 7(6):1845–1878, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Garsia, Mark Haiman, and Glenn Tesler

    Fran¸ cois Bergeron, Adriano M. Garsia, Mark Haiman, and Glenn Tesler. Identities and positivity con- jectures for some remarkable operators in the theory of symmetric functions.Methods and Applications of Analysis,6(3):363–420, 1999

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    Garsia, Emily Sergel Leven, and Guoce Xin

    Fran¸ cois Bergeron, Adriano M. Garsia, Emily Sergel Leven, and Guoce Xin. Compositional (km, kn)- shuffle conjectures.International Mathematics Research Notices,2016(14):4229–4270, 2016

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Fran¸ cois Bergeron and Adriano M. Garsia. Science fiction and Macdonald’s polynomials.Algebraic methods andq-special functions (Montr´ eal, QC, 1996), CRM Proceedings and Lecture Notes,22:1–52, 1999

    work page 1996

  6. [6]

    Seelinger

    Jonah Blasiak, Mark Haiman, Jennifer Morse, Anna Pun, and George H. Seelinger. A proof of the extended Delta conjecture.Forum of Mathematics, Pi,11:e6, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Seelinger

    Jonah Blasiak, Mark Haiman, Jennifer Morse, Anna Pun, and George H. Seelinger. A shuffle theorem for paths under any line.Forum of Mathematics, Pi,11:e5, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Seelinger

    Jonah Blasiak, Mark Haiman, Jennifer Morse, Anna Pun, and George H. Seelinger. LLT polynomials in the Schiffmann algebra.Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik,811:93–133, 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Seelinger

    Jonah Blasiak, Mark Haiman, Jennifer Morse, Anna Pun, and George H. Seelinger. Dens, nests and the Loehr-Warrington conjecture.Journal of the American Mathematical Society,38(4):1049–1106, 2025

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Seelinger

    Jonah Blasiak, Mark Haiman, Jennifer Morse, Anna Pun, and George H. Seelinger. A raising operator formula for Macdonald polynomials.Forum of Mathematics, Sigma,13:e47, 2025

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Seelinger

    Jonah Blasiak, Mark Haiman, Jennifer Morse, Anna Pun, and George H. Seelinger. Flagged LLT polynomials, nonsymmetric plethysm, and nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials. arXiv:2506.09015 [math.CO], 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Seelinger

    Jonah Blasiak, Mark Haiman, Jennifer Morse, Anna Pun, and George H. Seelinger. The nonsymmetric shuffle theorem. arXiv:2509.24040 [math.CO], 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Catalan functions andk-Schur posi- tivity.Journal of the American Mathematical Society,32(4):921–963, 2019

    Jonah Blasiak, Jennifer Morse, Anna Pun, and Daniel Summers. Catalan functions andk-Schur posi- tivity.Journal of the American Mathematical Society,32(4):921–963, 2019

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    A proof of the shuffle conjecture.Journal of the American Mathematical Society,31(3):661–697, 2018

    Erik Carlsson and Anton Mellit. A proof of the shuffle conjecture.Journal of the American Mathematical Society,31(3):661–697, 2018

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials.International Mathematics Research Notices, 1995(10):483–515, 1995

    Ivan Cherednik. Nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials.International Mathematics Research Notices, 1995(10):483–515, 1995

    work page 1995

  16. [16]

    The Schr¨ oder case of the generalized Delta conjecture.European Journal of Combinatorics,81:58–83, 2019

    Michele D’Adderio, Alessandro Iraci, and Anna Vanden Wyngaerd. The Schr¨ oder case of the generalized Delta conjecture.European Journal of Combinatorics,81:58–83, 2019

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Theta operators, refined Delta conjectures, and coinvariants.Advances in Mathematics,376:107447, 2021

    Michele D’Adderio, Alessandro Iraci, and Anna Vanden Wyngaerd. Theta operators, refined Delta conjectures, and coinvariants.Advances in Mathematics,376:107447, 2021

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    A proof of the compositional Delta conjecture.Advances in Math- ematics,402:108342, 2022

    Michele D’Adderio and Anton Mellit. A proof of the compositional Delta conjecture.Advances in Math- ematics,402:108342, 2022

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Garsia and Mark Haiman

    Adriano M. Garsia and Mark Haiman. A graded representation model for Macdonald’s polynomials. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,90(8):3607–3610, 1993

    work page 1993

  20. [20]

    Garsia and Anton Mellit

    Adriano M. Garsia and Anton Mellit. Five-term relation and Macdonald polynomials.Journal of Com- binatorial Theory, Series A,163:182–194, 2019

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Refined knot invariants and Hilbert schemes.Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees,104(3):403–435, 2015

    Eugene Gorsky and Andrei Negut ¸. Refined knot invariants and Hilbert schemes.Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees,104(3):403–435, 2015. 32 DUN QIU AND MINHAO ZHANG

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008

    James Haglund.Theq, t-Catalan numbers and the space of diagonal harmonics, volume 41 ofUniversity Lecture Series. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008

    work page 2008

  23. [23]

    A combinatorial formula for nonsymmetric Mac- donald polynomials.American Journal of Mathematics,130(2):359–383, 2008

    James Haglund, Mark Haiman, and Nicholas Loehr. A combinatorial formula for nonsymmetric Mac- donald polynomials.American Journal of Mathematics,130(2):359–383, 2008

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    Remmel, and Aleksey Ulyanov

    James Haglund, Mark Haiman, Nicholas Loehr, Jeffrey B. Remmel, and Aleksey Ulyanov. A combinato- rial formula for the character of the diagonal coinvariants.Duke Mathematical Journal,126(2):195–232, 2005

    work page 2005

  25. [25]

    A compositional shuffle conjecture specifying touch points of the Dyck path.Canadian Journal of Mathematics,64(4):822–844, 2012

    James Haglund, Jennifer Morse, and Mike Zabrocki. A compositional shuffle conjecture specifying touch points of the Dyck path.Canadian Journal of Mathematics,64(4):822–844, 2012

    work page 2012

  26. [26]

    Remmel, and Andrew T

    James Haglund, Jeffrey B. Remmel, and Andrew T. Wilson. The Delta conjecture.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society,370(6):4029–4057, 2018

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Ordered set partitions, generalized coinvariant algebras, and the Delta conjecture.Advances in Mathematics,329:851–915, 2018

    James Haglund, Brendon Rhoades, and Mark Shimozono. Ordered set partitions, generalized coinvariant algebras, and the Delta conjecture.Advances in Mathematics,329:851–915, 2018

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Hall-Littlewood expansions of Schur delta operators att= 0.S´ eminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire,79:Article B79c, 2018

    James Haglund, Brendon Rhoades, and Mark Shimozono. Hall-Littlewood expansions of Schur delta operators att= 0.S´ eminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire,79:Article B79c, 2018

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Vanishing theorems and character formulas for the Hilbert scheme of points in the plane

    Mark Haiman. Vanishing theorems and character formulas for the Hilbert scheme of points in the plane. Inventiones mathematicae,149:371–407, 2002

    work page 2002

  30. [30]

    Monk rules for typeGL n Macdonald polynomials.Journal of Algebra, 655:493–516, 2024

    Tom Halverson and Arun Ram. Monk rules for typeGL n Macdonald polynomials.Journal of Algebra, 655:493–516, 2024

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    The stable limit DAHA and the double Dyck path algebra.Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu,23(1):379–424, 2024

    Bogdan Ion and Dongyu Wu. The stable limit DAHA and the double Dyck path algebra.Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu,23(1):379–424, 2024

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Shuffle formula in science fiction for Macdonald polynomials.Compositio Mathematica,161(5):1075–1127, 2025

    Donghyun Kim, Seung Jin Lee, and Jaeseong Oh. Shuffle formula in science fiction for Macdonald polynomials.Compositio Mathematica,161(5):1075–1127, 2025

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Extending the science fiction and the Loehr–Warrington formula

    Donghyun Kim and Jaeseong Oh. Extending the science fiction and the Loehr–Warrington formula. arXiv:2409.01041 [math.CO], 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Shuffle theorem for torus link homology

    Donghyun Kim and Jaeseong Oh. Shuffle theorem for torus link homology. arXiv:2602.06338 [math.GT], 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Integrality of two variable Kostka functions.Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik,482:177–189, 1997

    Friedrich Knop. Integrality of two variable Kostka functions.Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik,482:177–189, 1997

    work page 1997

  36. [36]

    Macdonald.Affine Hecke algebras and orthogonal polynomials, volume 157 ofCambridge Tracts in Mathematics

    Ian G. Macdonald.Affine Hecke algebras and orthogonal polynomials, volume 157 ofCambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003

    work page 2003

  37. [37]

    Macdonald.Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials

    Ian G. Macdonald.Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, second edition, 1995

    work page 1995

  38. [38]

    Toric braids and (m, n)-parking functions.Duke Mathematical Journal,170(18):4123– 4169, 2021

    Anton Mellit. Toric braids and (m, n)-parking functions.Duke Mathematical Journal,170(18):4123– 4169, 2021

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    Eric M. Opdam. Harmonic analysis for certain representations of graded Hecke algebras.Acta Mathe- matica,175(1):75–121, 1995

    work page 1995

  40. [40]

    The valley version of the extended Delta conjecture.Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A,175:105271, 2020

    Dun Qiu and Andrew Timothy Wilson. The valley version of the extended Delta conjecture.Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A,175:105271, 2020

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Ordered set partition statistics and the Delta conjecture.Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A,154:172–217, 2018

    Brendon Rhoades. Ordered set partition statistics and the Delta conjecture.Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A,154:172–217, 2018

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    The Delta conjecture atq= 1.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 369(10):7509–7530, 2017

    Marino Romero. The Delta conjecture atq= 1.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 369(10):7509–7530, 2017

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    Interpolation, integrality, and a generalization of Macdonald’s polynomials.Interna- tional Mathematics Research Notices,1996(10):457–471, 1996

    Siddhartha Sahi. Interpolation, integrality, and a generalization of Macdonald’s polynomials.Interna- tional Mathematics Research Notices,1996(10):457–471, 1996

    work page 1996

  44. [44]

    A module for the Delta conjecture

    Mike Zabrocki. A module for the Delta conjecture. arXiv:1902.08966 [math.CO], 2019

    work page Pith review arXiv 1902

  45. [45]

    A proof of the 4-variable Catalan polynomial of the Delta conjecture.Journal of Com- binatorics,10(4):599–632, 2019

    Mike Zabrocki. A proof of the 4-variable Catalan polynomial of the Delta conjecture.Journal of Com- binatorics,10(4):599–632, 2019. THE NONSYMMETRIC COMPOSITIONAL DELTA THEOREM 33 Center for Combinatorics, LPMC, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, P. R. China Email address:qiudun@nankai.edu.cn Center for Combinatorics, LPMC, Nankai University, Tianjin 3000...

    work page 2019