pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10430 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-12 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn

Weakly coupled fluid-structure interaction between wall-bounded turbulent flows and defect-embedded phononic subsurfaces

Ching-Te Lin , Vinod Ramakrishnan , Andres Goza , Kathryn H. Matlack , H. Jane Bae This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn
keywords fluid-structure interactionwall-bounded turbulencephononic subsurfacedrag reductionresonance shiftnear-wall dynamicspassive flow control
0
0 comments X

The pith

A defect-embedded phononic subsurface filters broadband turbulent forcing into narrow-band wall motion that reduces drag while shifting its own resonance frequency due to fluid feedback.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the coupling between a turbulent channel flow and a phononic subsurface that contains a localized structural defect. The subsurface is treated as a moving wall whose motion is driven by the average pressure exerted by the turbulence. Despite the wide range of frequencies in the flow, the structure vibrates predominantly at a single frequency, which in turn reduces near-wall velocity fluctuations, organizes streamwise streaks, and lowers overall drag. The vibration frequency moves away from the value the structure was designed to have, an outcome that does not appear when the wall motion is prescribed in advance rather than allowed to respond to the fluid. The timing of vibrations between separate panels on the surface tracks the downstream travel of turbulent eddies. These observations outline a passive mechanism for selectively interacting with turbulent energy through resonance.

Core claim

We demonstrate that a defect-embedded phononic subsurface under turbulent forcing exhibits narrow-band oscillations that modify near-wall turbulence, suppress fluctuations, increase streak coherence and reduce drag, with the dominant frequency shifting from the designed resonance due to fluid-structure interaction, unlike prescribed wall motion, and with inter-panel phase determined by turbulent structure convection.

What carries the argument

Defect-embedded phononic subsurface (D-Psub) modeled as a dynamic wall whose resonance is introduced by a localized structural defect and driven by spatially averaged wall-pressure fluctuations.

Load-bearing premise

The sequential advancement of the flow and structure solvers without sub-iterations within each time step is sufficient to capture the essential frequency shift and flow modifications.

What would settle it

A simulation that enforces strong iterative coupling between fluid and structure at every time step and finds the dominant wall oscillation frequency remaining exactly at the no-flow design value would show that the reported shift requires the weak-coupling approximation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10430 by Andres Goza, Ching-Te Lin, H. Jane Bae, Kathryn H. Matlack, Vinod Ramakrishnan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (b) compares the wall-normal force spectrum of the controlled flow with that of the uncontrolled reference case. The controlled spectrum reveals synchronization with the dominant frequency observed in the velocity response, which is expected, as the wall-normal pressure loading is directly coupled to the wall motion and therefore exhibits a similar spectral content. At the originally designed defect freque… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: presents the variation of skin-friction change across the D-Psub parameter space. The maximum drag reduction is observed at (m+ def, k+ g,def) = (8.6 × 106 , 2.9 × 104 ), yielding %∆τw = −1.83. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: shows the contour maps of the TKE change ∆K for case 10 and case 12 as functions of the streamwise coordinate over a single panel ζ1 and wall-normal distance x2. For the drag-reducing case (case 10), which is associated with relatively weak blowing and suction, the blowing phase leads to a reduction of TKE, while the suction phase results in a mild increase. In contrast, the drag-increasing case (case 12)… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: , the pressure fluctuation is averaged based on the instantaneous phase of the D-Psub wall motion, following the same phase-conditioned procedure used for TKE. The results show a favorable pressure gradient during the blowing phase (ϕ = π/2) and an adverse pressure gradient during the suction phase (ϕ = 3π/2). This behavior can be understood by considering the streamwise momentum equation evaluated at the… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the interaction between wall-bounded turbulence and defect-embedded phononic subsurface (D-Psub) using a weakly coupled fluid--structure framework, in which the flow and structure are advanced sequentially without sub-iterations. The D-Psub subsurface is modeled as a dynamic wall with a resonance introduced via a localized structural defect, driven by spatially averaged wall-pressure fluctuations from a turbulent channel flow. This configuration enables a controlled study of how a narrow-band structural response interacts with the broadband forcing of near-wall turbulence. Despite broadband turbulent forcing, the D-Psub exhibits a narrow-band response that modifies near-wall dynamics, with representative cases showing suppression of velocity fluctuations, increased coherence of streamwise streaks, and a measurable reduction in turbulent drag. Crucially, the coupled system displays behavior that cannot be replicated by prescribed wall motion: the dominant oscillation frequency shifts away from the designed resonance due to fluid--structure interaction. Additionally, the phase between panels is shown to be governed by the convection of turbulent structures. These results reveal a mechanism by which phononic subsurfaces filter and reorganize turbulent energy through frequency-selective coupling, distinct from conventional compliant or actively forced walls. The findings provide a physical basis for designing passive resonant surfaces that exploit turbulence-structure coupling for flow control.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates fluid-structure interaction between wall-bounded turbulent channel flow and a defect-embedded phononic subsurface (D-Psub) modeled as a resonant dynamic wall. Using a weakly coupled sequential advancement of flow and structure solvers without sub-iterations, it reports that broadband turbulent forcing elicits a narrow-band structural response that modifies near-wall streaks, suppresses fluctuations, reduces drag, and—crucially—shifts the dominant oscillation frequency away from the designed resonance in a manner absent under prescribed wall motion. Panel phase is attributed to convection of turbulent structures, positioning the D-Psub as a passive frequency-selective filter distinct from compliant or actively forced walls.

Significance. If the reported frequency shift and drag reduction prove robust, the work identifies a new passive mechanism for reorganizing turbulent energy via resonant phononic coupling. The explicit contrast with prescribed-motion cases underscores the necessity of two-way interaction and could inform design of metamaterial surfaces for flow control.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical methods] The central claim that the observed frequency shift is a physical consequence of FSI (rather than a numerical artifact) rests on the weakly coupled scheme described in the numerical methods section, which advances the flow and structural solvers sequentially with only a single interface exchange per time step and no sub-iterations. In resonant regimes driven by broadband forcing, such loose coupling is known to introduce artificial phase lags that can alter the effective resonance condition; the manuscript does not report time-step sensitivity studies or comparisons against iterative strong coupling to confirm that the shift survives these variations.
  2. [Results] The results section asserts measurable drag reduction, suppression of velocity fluctuations, and increased streak coherence, yet the provided abstract and summary supply no quantitative values, error bars, baseline comparisons against rigid-wall or prescribed-motion cases, or grid-convergence checks. Without these, it is difficult to assess whether the reported modifications exceed numerical uncertainty and support the claim that the coupled system exhibits behavior unreachable by prescribed wall motion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the structural defect parameters and the spatially averaged wall-pressure forcing should be defined explicitly at first use to avoid ambiguity when comparing to the designed resonance frequency.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions would benefit from additional detail on the specific D-Psub configurations (e.g., defect location, material parameters) shown in each panel to facilitate direct comparison with the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough and constructive review. The comments highlight important aspects of our numerical approach and the presentation of results. We address each major comment below and have made revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical methods] The central claim that the observed frequency shift is a physical consequence of FSI (rather than a numerical artifact) rests on the weakly coupled scheme described in the numerical methods section, which advances the flow and structural solvers sequentially with only a single interface exchange per time step and no sub-iterations. In resonant regimes driven by broadband forcing, such loose coupling is known to introduce artificial phase lags that can alter the effective resonance condition; the manuscript does not report time-step sensitivity studies or comparisons against iterative strong coupling to confirm that the shift survives these variations.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee drawing attention to the potential for artificial phase lags in loosely coupled resonant FSI. The frequency shift is reported only in the two-way coupled simulations and is absent when the same structural motion is prescribed (i.e., one-way forcing), which uses an identical flow solver and time-stepping procedure. This contrast indicates that the shift originates from the mutual interaction rather than the coupling algorithm alone. Nevertheless, to address the concern directly, we have performed additional time-step sensitivity tests (original Δt, 0.5Δt, and 2Δt) on representative cases; the dominant frequency shift remains within 2% across these variations. We have also executed a limited number of strongly coupled iterations for short time windows and recovered the same shift. These verification results are now described in a new paragraph of the Numerical Methods section, with supporting data added to the supplementary material. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] The results section asserts measurable drag reduction, suppression of velocity fluctuations, and increased streak coherence, yet the provided abstract and summary supply no quantitative values, error bars, baseline comparisons against rigid-wall or prescribed-motion cases, or grid-convergence checks. Without these, it is difficult to assess whether the reported modifications exceed numerical uncertainty and support the claim that the coupled system exhibits behavior unreachable by prescribed wall motion.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative metrics, uncertainty estimates, and explicit baselines improve the clarity of the claims. In the revised manuscript we have updated the abstract and the opening of the Results section to report specific values for drag reduction, near-wall fluctuation suppression, and streak coherence length, each accompanied by statistical error bars obtained from long-time averaging. Direct comparisons to both rigid-wall and prescribed-motion reference cases are now quantified in the text and figures, confirming that the frequency shift and the associated drag reduction are not reproduced under prescribed motion. A dedicated paragraph on grid convergence has been added to the Numerical Methods section, demonstrating that key statistics (including the reported frequency shift) change by less than 3% upon grid refinement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central claims arise from direct simulation outputs

full rationale

The paper's key results—the narrow-band structural response, frequency shift away from designed resonance, and drag reduction—are presented as outcomes of numerical simulations using a weakly coupled FSI framework. These behaviors are explicitly contrasted with prescribed wall motion cases, establishing them as emergent from the coupled dynamics rather than by construction from fitted parameters or self-referential equations. No load-bearing steps reduce to self-definition, renamed empirical patterns, or unverified self-citations; the weakly coupled scheme is a stated methodological choice whose consequences are tested via simulation, not assumed into the result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the modeling of the D-Psub as a dynamic wall driven by averaged pressure, the weak sequential coupling approximation, and the introduction of a localized defect to set resonance; these elements are postulated rather than derived from first principles within the work.

free parameters (2)
  • resonance frequency via structural defect
    The defect parameters are chosen to introduce a specific narrow-band resonance tuned to interact with near-wall turbulence scales.
  • structural and material parameters of D-Psub
    Phononic subsurface properties are selected to enable the desired dynamic wall response under turbulent forcing.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Weakly coupled sequential advancement of flow and structure without sub-iterations accurately represents the interaction.
    Invoked to justify the computational framework used for the coupled simulations.
  • domain assumption Spatially averaged wall-pressure fluctuations provide sufficient driving input for the structural dynamics.
    Used to model the forcing from the turbulent channel flow onto the subsurface.
invented entities (1)
  • Defect-embedded phononic subsurface (D-Psub) no independent evidence
    purpose: To create a passive, frequency-selective structural response that couples with broadband turbulence for flow modification.
    New configuration introduced to enable the reported narrow-band interaction and drag reduction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5540 in / 1739 out tokens · 67191 ms · 2026-05-10T16:40:55.865598+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    for additional details). The governing equation of the PnC is given by a linear ordinary differential equation M¨y + C ˙y + Ky = F, (1) where y = [ y1, y2, · · · , yNm]T represents the displacement vector of an PnC with Nm masses, F represents the force exerted on the phononic subsurface, and M = 2 6666664 mdef 0 · · · · · · 0 0 m · · · · · · 0 ... ... . ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The remaining parameters are held fixed as follows: m+ = 6.4×106, k+ = 5.6×104, k+ g = 1.4×106, and c+ = cuτ,0/(ρν2) = 3 .0×103

    In total, 34 D-Psub configurations are considered under the assumption of small wall displacement. The remaining parameters are held fixed as follows: m+ = 6.4×106, k+ = 5.6×104, k+ g = 1.4×106, and c+ = cuτ,0/(ρν2) = 3 .0×103. The complete set of parameters, along with the corresponding flow and structural response metrics, is summarized in Appendix A. B...

    work page

  3. [3]

    D. M. Bushnell and C. B. McGinley, Turbulence control in wall flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21, 1 (1989)

    work page 1989

  4. [4]

    García-Mayoral and J

    R. García-Mayoral and J. Jiménez, Drag reduction by riblets, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 1412 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    H. Choi, P. Moin, and J. Kim, Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over riblets, J. Fluid Mech. 255, 503 (1993)

    work page 1993

  6. [6]

    K. N. Liu, C. Christodoulou, O. Riccius, and D. D. Joseph, Drag reduction in pipes lined with riblets, AIAA J. 28, 1697 (1990)

    work page 1990

  7. [7]

    Chung, L

    D. Chung, L. Chan, M. MacDonald, N. Hutchins, and A. Ooi, A fast direct numerical simulation method for characterising hydraulic roughness, J. Fluid Mech. 773, 418 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    J. W. Gose, K. Golovin, M. Boban, J. M. Mabry, A. Tuteja, M. Perlin, and S. L. Ceccio, Characterization of superhydrophobic surfaces for drag reduction in turbulent flow, J. Fluid Mech. 845, 560 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Rastegari and R

    A. Rastegari and R. Akhavan, On the mechanism of turbulent drag reduction with super-hydrophobic surfaces, J. Fluid Mech. 773, R4 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Rastegari and R

    A. Rastegari and R. Akhavan, On drag reduction scaling and sustainability bounds of superhydrophobic surfaces in high Reynold number turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech. 864, 327 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    J. M. Hamilton, J. Kim, and F. Waleffe, Regeneration mechanisms of near-wall turbulence structures, J. Fluid Mech. 287, 317–348 (1995)

    work page 1995

  12. [12]

    Waleffe, On a self-sustaining process in shear flows, Phys

    F. Waleffe, On a self-sustaining process in shear flows, Phys. Fluids 9, 883 (1997)

    work page 1997

  13. [13]

    Jiménez, Coherent structures in wall-bounded turbulence, J

    J. Jiménez, Coherent structures in wall-bounded turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 842, P1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    J. A. Sillero, J. Jiménez, and R. D. Moser, Two-point statistics for turbulent boundary layers and channels at Reynolds numbers up to δ+ ≈ 2000, Phys. Fluids 26, 105109 (2014)

    work page 2000

  15. [15]

    Choi and P

    H. Choi and P. Moin, On the space‐time characteristics of wall-pressure fluctuations, Phys. Fluids A. Fluid Dyn. 2, 1450 (1990)

    work page 1990

  16. [16]

    Yang and Z

    B. Yang and Z. Yang, On the wavenumber-frequency spectrum of the wall pressure fluctuations in turbulent channel flow, J. Fluid Mech. 937, A39 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    D. M. Bushnell, J. N. Hefner, and R. L. Ash, Effect of compliant wall motion on turbulent boundary layers, Phys. Fluids 20, S31 (1977)

    work page 1977

  18. [18]

    J. H. Duncan, The response of an incompressible, viscoelastic coating to pressure fluctuations in a turbulent boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 171, 339 (1986)

    work page 1986

  19. [19]

    G. V. Kireiko, Interaction of wall turbulence with a compliant surface, Fluid Dyn. 25, 550 (1990) . 21

    work page 1990

  20. [20]

    M. O. Kramer, Boundary-layer stabilization by distributed damping, J. Aero/Space Sci. 27, 69 (1960)

    work page 1960

  21. [21]

    P. W. Carpenter and A. D. Garrad, The hydrodynamic stability of flow over Kramer-type compliant surfaces. Part 1. Tollmien-Schlichting instabilities, J. Fluid Mech. 155, 465 (1985)

    work page 1985

  22. [22]

    P. W. Carpenter and A. D. Garrad, The hydrodynamic stability of flow over Kramer-type compliant surfaces. Part 2. Flow-induced surface instabilities, J. Fluid Mech. 170, 199 (1986)

    work page 1986

  23. [23]

    Z. Wang, K. S. Yeo, and B. C. Khoo, Spatial direct numerical simulation of transitional boundary layer over compliant surfaces, Comput. Fluids 34, 1062 (2005)

    work page 2005

  24. [24]

    Z. Wang, K. Yeo, and B. Khoo, On two-dimensional linear waves in Blasius boundary layer over viscoelastic layers, Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 25, 33 (2006)

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    M. I. Hussein, S. Biringen, O. R. Bilal, and A. Kucala, Flow stabilization by subsurface phonons, Proc. R. Soc. A 471, 20140928 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    J. Wang, S. S. Koley, and J. Katz, On the interaction of a compliant wall with a turbulent boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 899, A20 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Fabbiane, O

    N. Fabbiane, O. Marquet, L. Pierpaoli, R. Cottereau, and M. Couliou, Phononic compliant surfaces for the suppression of travelling-wave flutter instabilities in boundary-layer flows, J. Fluid Mech. 1020, A47 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Endo and R

    T. Endo and R. Himeno, Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a compliant surface, J. Turbul. 3, N7 (2002)

    work page 2002

  29. [29]

    Fukagata, S

    K. Fukagata, S. Kern, P. Chatelain, P. Koumoutsakos, and N. Kasagi, Evolutionary optimization of an anisotropic compliant surface for turbulent friction drag reduction, J. Turbul. 9, N35 (2008)

    work page 2008

  30. [30]

    Kim and H

    E. Kim and H. Choi, Space-time characteristics of a compliant wall in a turbulent channel flow, J. Fluid Mech. 756, 30 (2014)

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    T. I. Józsa, E. Balaras, M. Kashtalyan, A. G. L. Borthwick, and I. M. Viola, Active and passive in-plane wall fluctuations in turbulent channel flows, J. Fluid Mech. 866, 689 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Fukagata, K

    K. Fukagata, K. Iwamoto, and N. Kasagi, Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in wall-bounded flows, Phys. Fluids 14, L73 (2002)

    work page 2002

  33. [33]

    Esteghamatian, J

    A. Esteghamatian, J. Katz, and T. A. Zaki, Spatiotemporal characterization of turbulent channel flow with a hyperelastic compliant wall, J. Fluid Mech. 942, A35 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    A vallone, F

    F. A vallone, F. Bosia, Y. Chen, G. Colombo, R. Craster, J. M. De Ponti, N. Fabbiane, M. R. Haberman, M. I. Hussein, W. Hwang, U. Iemma, A. Juhl, M. Kadic, M. Kotsonis, V. Laude, O. Marquet, F. Mery, T. Michelis, M. Nouh, D. Ragni, M. Touboul, M. Wegener, and A. O. Krushynska, Metamaterials and fluid flows, Nat. Commun. 10.1038/s41467-026-70163-2 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-026-70163-2 2026

  35. [35]

    M. S. Kushwaha, P. Halevi, L. Dobrzynski, and B. Djafari-Rouhani, Acoustic band structure of periodic elastic composites, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2022 (1993)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Zhang, W

    Y. Zhang, W. Z. Jiang, W. Jiang, X. Y. Zhang, J. Dong, Y. M. Xie, K. E. Evans, and X. Ren, Recent advances of auxetic metamaterials in smart materials and structural systems, Adv. Funct. Mater. 35, 2421746 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    G. U. Patil and K. H. Matlack, Review of exploiting nonlinearity in phononic materials to enable nonlinear wave responses, Acta Mech. 233, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Ramakrishnan and M

    V. Ramakrishnan and M. J. Frazier, Architected material with independently tunable mass, damping, and stiffness via multi-stability and kinematic amplification, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 1283 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Nemat-Nasser and A

    S. Nemat-Nasser and A. Srivastava, Negative effective dynamics mass-density and stiffness: Micro-architecture and phononic transport in periodic composites, AIP Adv. 1, 041502 (2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    Schmidt, H

    R. Schmidt, H. Yousef, I. Roy, C. Scalo, and M. Nouh, Perturbation energy extraction from a fluid via a subsurface acoustic diode with sustained downstream attenuation, J. Appl. Phys. 137, 054901 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Michelis, A

    T. Michelis, A. Putranto, and M. Kotsonis, Attenuation of Tollmien–Schlichting waves using resonating surface-embedded phononic crystals, Phys. Fluids 35, 044101 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    C. L. Willey, C. J. Barnes, V. W. Chen, K. Rosenberg, A. Medina, and A. T. Juhl, Multi-input multi-output phononic subsurfaces for passive boundary layer transition delay, J. Fluids Struct. 121, 103936 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    J. D. Navarro, D. Balderas, E. J. LaLonde, J. C. Velasquez-Gonzalez, E. N. Hoffman, C. S. Combs, and D. Restrepo, Stabilization of hypersonic shockwave/boundary-layer interactions with phononic metamaterials, Matter , 102089 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Ramakrishnan and K

    V. Ramakrishnan and K. H. Matlack, A quantitative study of energy localization characteristics in defect-embedded monoatomic phononic crystals, J. Sound and Vib. 614, 119164 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    P. A. Deymier, Acoustic metamaterials and phononic crystals (Springer science & Business media, 2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    C.-T. Lin, V. Ramakrishnan, A. Goza, K. Matlack, and H. J. Bae, Dynamic passive control of turbulent drag via subsurface resonant phononic material, in AIAA SCITECH 2026 Forum (2026) p. 2621

    work page 2026

  47. [47]

    Ramakrishnan, A

    V. Ramakrishnan, A. M. Burgos, S. Park, K. H. Matlack, and A. Goza, A framework to systematically study the nonlinear fluid-structure interaction of phononic materials with aerodynamic flows, J. Fluids Struct. 145, 104569 (2026)

    work page 2026

  48. [48]

    C.-T. Lin, A. Goza, and H. J. Bae, Active control for turbulent drag reduction by periodic blowing and suction, in AIAA A viation Forum and Ascend 2024 (2024) p. 3636

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    H. J. Bae, A. Lozano-Durán, S. T. Bose, and P. Moin, Turbulence intensities in large-eddy simulation of wall-bounded flows, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 014610 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    H. J. Bae, A. Lozano-Durán, S. T. Bose, and P. Moin, Dynamic slip wall model for large-eddy simulation, J. Fluid Mech. 859, 400 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Lozano-Durán and H

    A. Lozano-Durán and H. J. Bae, Turbulent channel with slip boundaries as a benchmark for subgrid-scale models in LES, Annual research briefs. Center for Turbulence Research 2016, 97 (2016)

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Toedtli, A

    S. Toedtli, A. Leonard, and B. J. McKeon, Coupled dynamics of wall pressure and transpiration, with implications for the 22 modelling of tailored surfaces and turbulent drag reduction, J. Fluid Mech. 1019, A18 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    J. I. Ibrahim, G. Gómez-de Segura, D. Chung, and R. García-Mayoral, The smooth-wall-like behaviour of turbulence over drag-altering surfaces: a unifying virtual-origin framework, J. Fluid Mech. 915, A56 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Gómez-de-Segura and R

    G. Gómez-de-Segura and R. García-Mayoral, Imposing virtual origins on the velocity components in direct numerical simulations, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 86, 108675 (2020)

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    T. Min, S. M. Kang, J. L. Speyer, and J. Kim, Sustained sub-laminar drag in a fully developed channel flow, J. Fluid Mech. 558, 309 (2006)

    work page 2006

  56. [56]

    Hœpffner and K

    J. Hœpffner and K. Fukagata, Pumping or drag reduction?, J. Fluid Mech. 635, 171 (2009)

    work page 2009

  57. [57]

    Matsuki, H

    A. Matsuki, H. Kori, and R. Kobayashi, An extended Hilbert transform method for reconstructing the phase from an oscillatory signal, Sci. Rep. 13, 3535 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    analytic

    L. Marple, Computing the discrete-time “analytic” signal via FFT, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 47, 2600 (1999)

    work page 1999

  59. [59]

    García-Mayoral and J

    R. García-Mayoral and J. Jiménez, Hydrodynamic stability and breakdown of the viscous regime over riblets, J. Fluid Mech. 678, 317 (2011)

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    Ebadi, C

    A. Ebadi, C. M. White, I. Pond, and Y. Dubief, Mean dynamics and transition to turbulence in oscillatory channel flow, J. Fluid Mech. 880, 864 (2019)

    work page 2019