pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10798 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-12 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.ET· cs.SY

A Control-Referenced Tri-Channel OECT Receiver for Hybrid Molecular Communication Toward Brain Organoid Interfaces

Hongbin Ni , Ozgur B. Akan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.ETcs.SY
keywords molecular communicationOECT receivercontrol referencinghybrid modulationbrain organoiddopamine serotonindrift compensationMonte Carlo simulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A matched control pixel improves hybrid molecular signal detection in a tri-channel OECT receiver by rejecting common-mode drift.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models a tri-channel OECT receiver with dopamine-selective, serotonin-selective, and hydrogel-matched control pixels for molecular communication at brain organoid interfaces. Simulations couple finite-duration release, restricted diffusion, aptamer binding, OECT response, and multiple noise sources to compare MoSK, CSK-4, and hybrid detectors with and without control referencing. At 45 micrometers the control pixel lowers hybrid symbol error rate from 3.71 times 10 to the minus 2 to 1.09 times 10 to the minus 2 at 14000 molecules per symbol while leaving the MoSK branch nearly unchanged. The work identifies a regime-dependent rule for when matched control referencing aids amplitude decoding and reports a hybrid limit of detection of 11866 molecules per symbol in calibrated no-ISI benchmarks.

Core claim

By coupling finite-duration release, restricted diffusion with clearance, aptamer binding, OECT transduction, and correlated thermal, flicker, and drift noise, the study shows that a hydrogel-matched control pixel reduces Hybrid SER from 3.71 times 10 to the minus 2 to 1.09 times 10 to the minus 2 at 45 micrometers and 14000 molecules per symbol while barely affecting the MoSK component, establishing a transferable regime-dependent rule for when matched control referencing benefits hybrid amplitude decoding.

What carries the argument

the hydrogel-matched control pixel used solely for common-mode drift and low-frequency baseline fluctuation rejection during amplitude decisions in the hybrid detector

If this is right

  • Control referencing improves the amplitude branch of hybrid modulation far more than the MoSK branch.
  • Hybrid plus control referencing reaches a lower limit of detection than CSK-4 plus control referencing over most of the studied medium-to-long distance range.
  • The benefit of matched control referencing is strongest at shorter distances and specific molecule counts.
  • The tri-channel front end enables simultaneous dopamine and serotonin readout with improved drift tolerance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The regime-dependent rule may apply to other drift-prone chemical sensor arrays in biological environments beyond organoids.
  • Extending the model to include real organoid clearance dynamics or electrode fouling could refine the distance-dependent forecasts.
  • The same control-referencing approach could be tested in multi-analyte molecular communication links using additional selective pixels.

Load-bearing premise

The control pixel provides a perfect match for common-mode drift and low-frequency baseline fluctuations of the signal pixels, and the coupled models accurately represent real biological conditions.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of hybrid symbol error rate with and without the control pixel at 45 micrometers and 14000 molecules per symbol in a physical OECT-organoid setup would confirm or refute the predicted threefold reduction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10798 by Hongbin Ni, Ozgur B. Akan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Tri-channel OECT receiver concept for brain organoid molecular communication. (a) Three-dimensional conceptual view of the organoid well and tri [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Tri-channel acquisition and detection. (a) Analog front-end and readout. (b) Companion digital processing and decision statistics. Synchronous sampling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Nominal-spacing performance under the Table II baseline. MoSK does not use the control channel. CSK-4 and Hybrid are shown with and without [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distance-dependent behavior under the baseline device setting. The LoD is defined as the smallest molecule budget meeting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Hybrid SER versus symbol period at r = 45 µm and Nm = 2.0 × 104 , with and without ISI and with and without control referencing. The SER minimum shifts from the shortest tested Ts under no-ISI conditions to an intermediate Ts once molecular memory is enabled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Device-level operating envelope for Hybrid reception at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Robustness of the Hybrid receiver under nuisance-parameter variation. The correlation sweep explains when the control path is beneficial, whereas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Brain organoid interfaces that seek neuromodulator readout benefit from chemical receivers with molecular specificity and tolerance to drift. This paper presents a receiver-centric theoretical study of a control-referenced tri-channel organic electrochemical transistor (OECT) receiver with dopamine- and serotonin-selective pixels alongside a hydrogel-matched control pixel. The Ag/AgCl electrode provides the electrochemical gate reference, whereas the control pixel is used only as a matched reference for common-mode drift and other low-frequency baseline fluctuations during amplitude decisions. We couple finite-duration release, restricted diffusion with clearance, aptamer binding, OECT transduction, and correlated thermal, flicker, and drift noise, and we evaluate MoSK, CSK-4, and a 2-bit Hybrid detector on the same front-end by Monte Carlo simulation. At $r=45$ micrometers, control referencing mainly benefits the Hybrid amplitude branch, reducing Hybrid SER from $3.71\times 10^{-2}$ to $1.09\times 10^{-2}$ at $N_m=1.40\times 10^4$ molecules/symbol while barely changing the MoSK component. In calibrated no-ISI front-end benchmarks, Hybrid+CTRL reaches an LoD of 11866 molecules/symbol at 45 micrometers and remains below CSK-4+CTRL over much of the medium-to-long-distance range studied. The reported SER and LoD values are scenario-based receiver forecasts, whereas the more transferable result is the regime-dependent rule for when matched control referencing benefits Hybrid amplitude decoding.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a receiver-centric theoretical study of a tri-channel organic electrochemical transistor (OECT) for hybrid molecular communication targeting brain organoid interfaces. It couples finite-duration molecular release, restricted diffusion with clearance, aptamer binding kinetics, OECT transduction, and correlated noise sources in Monte Carlo simulations to compare MoSK, CSK-4, and a 2-bit Hybrid detector, with and without a hydrogel-matched control pixel for common-mode drift referencing. At r=45 μm and N_m=1.40×10^4 molecules/symbol, control referencing is reported to reduce Hybrid amplitude-branch SER from 3.71×10^{-2} to 1.09×10^{-2} while leaving the MoSK component largely unchanged; the work also gives an LoD of 11866 molecules/symbol for Hybrid+CTRL and extracts a regime-dependent rule for when matched referencing benefits Hybrid amplitude decoding. The authors explicitly label the SER/LoD numbers as scenario-based forecasts.

Significance. If the coupled physical models prove representative, the work supplies a concrete simulation framework for evaluating drift mitigation in amplitude-based molecular receivers and isolates a transferable regime rule that could guide front-end design choices in neuromodulator readout systems. The explicit coupling of release, diffusion, binding, and multi-source noise models, together with the side-by-side evaluation of three modulation schemes on identical hardware, constitutes a useful methodological contribution for the molecular-communication community.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (modeling of the control pixel): the assumption that the control pixel supplies an exact common-mode match for low-frequency baseline fluctuations and drift is idealized and load-bearing for the reported Hybrid SER reduction (3.71×10^{-2} → 1.09×10^{-2}). No analysis of mismatch arising from fabrication variation, local clearance differences, or electrode impedance is provided; any realistic mismatch would directly alter the relative benefit of the CTRL channel.
  2. [§4–5] §4–5 (Monte Carlo results): the regime-dependent rule and the specific SER/LoD values are obtained solely from forward simulation of the coupled models without parameter fitting to measured OECT transfer curves, organoid diffusion data, or in-vitro drift spectra. A sensitivity study varying diffusion coefficient, aptamer on-rate, or flicker/drift noise spectra is required to establish that the boundaries of the “when matched referencing helps” rule are robust rather than artifacts of the chosen parameter set.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Clarify the precise definition and decision rule of the 2-bit Hybrid detector (amplitude plus MoSK) in the methods section so that the “Hybrid amplitude branch” can be reproduced from the text alone.
  2. Add a short table or paragraph summarizing the numerical values of all free parameters (N_m, r, diffusion coefficients, binding rates, noise PSDs) used in the Monte Carlo runs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of the methodological contribution and for the constructive major comments. We respond to each point below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (modeling of the control pixel): the assumption that the control pixel supplies an exact common-mode match for low-frequency baseline fluctuations and drift is idealized and load-bearing for the reported Hybrid SER reduction (3.71×10^{-2} → 1.09×10^{-2}). No analysis of mismatch arising from fabrication variation, local clearance differences, or electrode impedance is provided; any realistic mismatch would directly alter the relative benefit of the CTRL channel.

    Authors: We agree that the common-mode match is idealized in the present model. The control pixel is modeled as hydrogel-matched specifically to capture common-mode drift rejection for amplitude decisions, but fabrication variation, local clearance heterogeneity, and electrode impedance differences would indeed reduce the observed benefit. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in Section 3 that (i) explicitly states the ideal-match assumption, (ii) provides a qualitative estimate of how partial mismatch would degrade the Hybrid amplitude-branch SER improvement, and (iii) notes that the reported reduction therefore represents an upper-bound performance under ideal referencing conditions. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4–5] §4–5 (Monte Carlo results): the regime-dependent rule and the specific SER/LoD values are obtained solely from forward simulation of the coupled models without parameter fitting to measured OECT transfer curves, organoid diffusion data, or in-vitro drift spectra. A sensitivity study varying diffusion coefficient, aptamer on-rate, or flicker/drift noise spectra is required to establish that the boundaries of the “when matched referencing helps” rule are robust rather than artifacts of the chosen parameter set.

    Authors: All model parameters are taken from published experimental literature on OECT transfer characteristics, aptamer kinetics, and diffusion in hydrogel media, as already cited in the manuscript. The regime-dependent rule is derived from the relative dominance of drift noise versus other noise sources in the amplitude branch—an architectural feature of the noise model rather than a numerical coincidence. We acknowledge that the numerical SER/LoD values are scenario-specific forecasts (as stated in the abstract) and that a full sensitivity study would further strengthen robustness claims. However, performing additional Monte Carlo campaigns across multiple parameter variations is computationally intensive and lies beyond the scope of this theoretical receiver-centric study. In the revision we will expand the discussion of model assumptions and limitations to make the scenario-based nature of the quantitative results and the qualitative character of the regime rule more explicit. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; performance metrics and regime rule are direct outputs of forward Monte Carlo simulation under explicit model assumptions.

full rationale

The paper's central results (Hybrid SER reduction from 3.71e-2 to 1.09e-2, LoD of 11866 molecules/symbol, and the regime-dependent rule for control referencing) are obtained exclusively by running Monte Carlo simulations that couple the listed sub-models (finite-duration release, restricted diffusion+clearance, aptamer binding, OECT transduction, and noise sources) with chosen parameter values. These are scenario-based forecasts, not fitted parameters renamed as predictions, not self-definitional, and not justified by load-bearing self-citations. The derivation chain is self-contained: inputs are the physical models and parameters; outputs are the simulated SER/LoD values and the extracted rule. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central performance claims rest on standard domain models of diffusion, binding, and transistor transduction plus simulation parameters; no new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • N_m = 1.40e4 molecules/symbol
    Simulation parameter chosen to evaluate receiver performance at a specific operating point.
  • r = 45 micrometers
    Distance parameter used for the reported SER comparison.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Finite-duration release, restricted diffusion with clearance, aptamer binding, and OECT transduction models are sufficiently accurate for the scenarios studied.
    Invoked when coupling the physical processes for Monte Carlo evaluation.
  • domain assumption Noise consists of correlated thermal, flicker, and drift components that can be modeled as described.
    Used to generate the amplitude decisions and SER statistics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5583 in / 1405 out tokens · 38110 ms · 2026-05-10T15:27:43.912970+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly,

    M. A. Lancaster, M. Renner, C.-A. Martin, D. Wenzel, L. S. Bicknell, M. E. Hurles, T. Homfray, J. M. Penninger, A. P. Jackson, and J. A. Knoblich, “Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly,”Nature, vol. 501, pp. 373–379, 2013

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Complex oscillatory waves emerging from cortical organoids model early human brain network development,

    C. A. Trujillo, R. Gao, P. D. Negraes, J. Gu, J. Buchanan, S. Preissl, A. Wang, W. Wu, G. G. Haddad, I. A. Chaim, A. Domissy, M. Vanden- berghe, A. Devor, G. W. Yeo, B. V oytek, and A. R. Muotri, “Complex oscillatory waves emerging from cortical organoids model early human brain network development,”Cell Stem Cell, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 558– 569.e7, 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Multiple dopamine functions at different time courses,

    W. Schultz, “Multiple dopamine functions at different time courses,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 30, pp. 259–288, 2007

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Re- lease and uptake rates of 5-hydroxytryptamine in the dorsal raphe and substantia nigra reticulata of the rat brain,

    M. A. Bunin, C. Prioleau, R. B. Mailman, and R. M. Wightman, “Re- lease and uptake rates of 5-hydroxytryptamine in the dorsal raphe and substantia nigra reticulata of the rat brain,”Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1077–1087, 1998

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    Resolving neurotransmitters detected by fast-scan cyclic voltammetry,

    M. L. A. V . Heien, M. A. Johnson, and R. M. Wightman, “Resolving neurotransmitters detected by fast-scan cyclic voltammetry,”Analytical Chemistry, vol. 76, no. 19, pp. 5697–5704, 2004

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    Overview of brain microdialysis,

    V . I. Chefer, A. C. Thompson, A. Zapata, and T. S. Shippenberg, “Overview of brain microdialysis,”Current Protocols in Neuroscience, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 7.1.1–7.1.28, 2009

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Fluorescence microscopy: A concise guide to current imaging methods,

    C. A. Combs, “Fluorescence microscopy: A concise guide to current imaging methods,”Current Protocols in Neuroscience, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 2.1.1–2.1.14, 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    The internet of bio-nano things,

    I. F. Akyildiz, M. Pierobon, S. Balasubramaniam, and Y . Koucheryavy, “The internet of bio-nano things,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 32–40, 2015

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    A comprehensive survey of recent advancements in molecular communi- cation,

    N. Farsad, H. B. Yilmaz, A. W. Eckford, C.-B. Chae, and W. Guo, “A comprehensive survey of recent advancements in molecular communi- cation,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1887–1919, 2016

    work page 1919

  10. [10]

    Organic electrochemical transistors,

    J. Rivnay, S. Inal, A. Salleo, R. M. Owens, M. Berggren, and G. G. Malliaras, “Organic electrochemical transistors,”Nature Reviews Mate- rials, vol. 3, p. 17086, 2018

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    High transconductance organic electrochemical transistors,

    D. Khodagholy, J. Rivnay, M. Sessolo, M. Gurfinkel, P. Leleux, L. H. Jimison, E. Stavrinidou, T. Herve, S. Sanaur, R. M. Owens, and G. G. Malliaras, “High transconductance organic electrochemical transistors,” Nature Communications, vol. 4, p. 2133, 2013

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Device physics of organic electrochemical transistors,

    J. T. Friedlein, R. R. McLeod, and J. Rivnay, “Device physics of organic electrochemical transistors,”Organic Electronics, vol. 63, pp. 398–414, 2018

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Organic electrochemical transistors as on- site signal amplifiers for electrochemical aptamer-based sensing,

    X. Ji, X. Lin, and J. Rivnay, “Organic electrochemical transistors as on- site signal amplifiers for electrochemical aptamer-based sensing,”Nature Communications, vol. 14, p. 1665, 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Aptamer-enhanced organic electrochem- ical transistors for ultra-sensitive dopamine detection,

    I. Soliman and C. Gunathilake, “Aptamer-enhanced organic electrochem- ical transistors for ultra-sensitive dopamine detection,”Next Materials, vol. 3, p. 100160, 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Multiplexed monitoring of neurochemicals via electrografting-enabled site-selective functionalization of aptamers on field-effect transistors,

    Z. Gao, G. Wu, Y . Song, H. Li, Y . Zhang, M. J. Schneider, Y . Qiang, J. Kaszas, Z. Weng, H. Sun, B. D. Huey, R. Y . Lai, and Y . Zhang, “Multiplexed monitoring of neurochemicals via electrografting-enabled site-selective functionalization of aptamers on field-effect transistors,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 94, no. 24, pp. 8605–8617, 2022

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Aptamer–field-effect transistors overcome Debye length limitations for small-molecule sensing,

    N. Nakatsuka, K.-A. Yang, J. M. Abendroth, K. M. Cheung, X. Xu, H. Yang, C. Zhao, B. Zhu, Y . S. Rim, Y . Yang, P. S. Weiss, M. N. Sto- janovi´c, and A. M. Andrews, “Aptamer–field-effect transistors overcome Debye length limitations for small-molecule sensing,”Science, vol. 362, no. 6412, pp. 319–324, 2018

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Diffusion in brain extracellular space,

    E. Sykov ´a and C. Nicholson, “Diffusion in brain extracellular space,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1277–1340, 2008

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    Extracellular space structure revealed by diffusion analysis,

    C. Nicholson and E. Sykov ´a, “Extracellular space structure revealed by diffusion analysis,”Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 207–215, 1998

    work page 1998

  19. [19]

    Charge noise in organic electrochemical transistors,

    R. L. Stoop, K. Thodkar, M. Sessolo, H. J. Bolink, C. Sch ¨onenberger, and M. Calame, “Charge noise in organic electrochemical transistors,” Physical Review Applied, vol. 7, p. 014009, 2017

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    A single- stage differential amplifier using organic electrochemical transistors,

    F. Fahimi Hanzaee, I. B. Dimov, L. W. Gatecliff, R. H. Bayford, G. G. Malliaras, A. Demosthenous, and N. de N. Donaldson, “A single- stage differential amplifier using organic electrochemical transistors,” Advanced Electronic Materials, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 2400755, 2025

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Complementary integration of organic electrochemical transistors for front-end amplifier circuits of flexible neural implants,

    I. Uguz, D. Ohayon, S. Yilmaz, S. Griggs, R. Sheelamanthula, J. D. Fabbri, I. McCulloch, S. Inal, and K. L. Shepard, “Complementary integration of organic electrochemical transistors for front-end amplifier circuits of flexible neural implants,”Science Advances, vol. 10, no. 12, p. eadi9710, 2024

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    A study of the drift phe- 16 nomena of gate-functionalized biosensors and dual-gate-functionalized biosensors in human serum,

    Y . Song, N. Chen, T. Curk, and H. E. Katz, “A study of the drift phe- 16 nomena of gate-functionalized biosensors and dual-gate-functionalized biosensors in human serum,”Molecules, vol. 29, no. 7, p. 1459, 2024

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    On the physical design of molecular communication receiver based on nanoscale biosensors,

    M. Kuscu and O. B. Akan, “On the physical design of molecular communication receiver based on nanoscale biosensors,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 2228–2243, 2016

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Modeling and analysis of SiNW FET-based molecular communi- cation receiver,

    ——, “Modeling and analysis of SiNW FET-based molecular communi- cation receiver,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 3708–3721, 2016

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Fabrication and microfluidic analysis of graphene-based molecular communication receiver for internet of nano things (IoNT),

    M. Kuscu, H. Ramezani, E. Dinc, S. Akhavan, and O. B. Akan, “Fabrication and microfluidic analysis of graphene-based molecular communication receiver for internet of nano things (IoNT),”Scientific Reports, vol. 11, p. 19600, 2021

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Frequency-domain detection for molecular communication with cross-reactive receptors,

    M. Civas, M. Kuscu, and O. B. Akan, “Frequency-domain detection for molecular communication with cross-reactive receptors,”IEEE Transac- tions on Communications, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 4741–4755, 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    3D receiver for molecular communications in internet of organoids,

    S. Zhang and O. B. Akan, “3D receiver for molecular communications in internet of organoids,”IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 91–100, 2025

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    ART-Rx: A proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controlled adaptive real-time threshold receiver for molecular communication,

    H. Ni and O. B. Akan, “ART-Rx: A proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controlled adaptive real-time threshold receiver for molecular communication,”IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 435–450, 2025

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    A concentration-time hybrid modulation scheme for molecular communications,

    M. C. Gursoy, D. Seo, and U. Mitra, “A concentration-time hybrid modulation scheme for molecular communications,”IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 288–299, 2021

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    On hybrid MoSK-CSK modulation based molecular communication: Error rate performance analysis using stochastic geometry,

    N. V . Sabu, N. Varshney, and A. K. Gupta, “On hybrid MoSK-CSK modulation based molecular communication: Error rate performance analysis using stochastic geometry,” in2019 International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOPT), Avignon, France, Jun. 2019, pp. 1–7

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery,

    J. Li and D. J. Mooney, “Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery,”Nature Reviews Materials, vol. 1, p. 16071, 2016

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    High- performance transistors for bioelectronics through tuning of channel thickness,

    J. Rivnay, P. Leleux, M. Ferro, M. Sessolo, A. Williamson, D. A. Koutsouras, D. Khodagholy, M. Ramuz, X. Strakosas, R. M. Owens, C. Benar, J.-M. Badier, C. Bernard, and G. G. Malliaras, “High- performance transistors for bioelectronics through tuning of channel thickness,”Science Advances, vol. 1, no. 4, p. e1400251, 2015

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Time-dependent assessment of stimulus-evoked regional dopamine release,

    R. N. Lippert, A. L. Cremer, S. E. Thanarajah, C. Korn, T. Jahans- Price, L. M. Burgeno, M. Tittgemeyer, J. C. Br ¨uning, M. E. Walton, and H. Backes, “Time-dependent assessment of stimulus-evoked regional dopamine release,”Nature Communications, vol. 10, p. 336, 2019

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Kinetic diversity of dopamine transmission in the dorsal striatum,

    I. M. Taylor, K. M. Nesbitt, S. H. Walters, E. L. Varner, Z. Shu, K. M. Bartlow, A. S. Jaquins-Gerstl, and A. C. Michael, “Kinetic diversity of dopamine transmission in the dorsal striatum,”Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 133, no. 4, pp. 522–531, 2015

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    A novel restricted diffusion model of evoked dopamine,

    S. H. Walters, I. M. Taylor, Z. Shu, and A. C. Michael, “A novel restricted diffusion model of evoked dopamine,”ACS Chemical Neu- roscience, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 776–783, 2014

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    Real-time characterization of dopamine overflow and uptake in the rat striatum,

    R. M. Wightman, C. Amatore, R. C. Engstrom, P. D. Hale, E. W. Kristensen, W. G. Kuhr, and L. J. May, “Real-time characterization of dopamine overflow and uptake in the rat striatum,”Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 513–523, 1988

    work page 1988

  37. [37]

    Enhanced dopamine re- lease by dopamine transport inhibitors described by a restricted diffusion model and fast-scan cyclic voltammetry,

    A. F. Hoffman, C. E. Spivak, and C. R. Lupica, “Enhanced dopamine re- lease by dopamine transport inhibitors described by a restricted diffusion model and fast-scan cyclic voltammetry,”ACS Chemical Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 700–709, 2016

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Diffusion-based noise analysis for molecular communication in nanonetworks,

    M. Pierobon and I. F. Akyildiz, “Diffusion-based noise analysis for molecular communication in nanonetworks,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 2532–2547, 2011

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum,

    I. Langmuir, “The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum,”Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1361–1403, 1918

    work page 1918

  40. [40]

    Real-time monitoring of biomolecules: Dynamic response limits of affinity-based sensors,

    R. M. Lubken, A. M. de Jong, and M. W. J. Prins, “Real-time monitoring of biomolecules: Dynamic response limits of affinity-based sensors,” ACS Sensors, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 286–295, 2022

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Thermal agitation of electricity in conductors,

    J. B. Johnson, “Thermal agitation of electricity in conductors,”Physical Review, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 97–109, 1928

    work page 1928

  42. [42]

    Thermal agitation of electric charge in conductors,

    H. Nyquist, “Thermal agitation of electric charge in conductors,”Phys- ical Review, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 110–113, 1928

    work page 1928

  43. [43]

    1/fnoise is no surface effect,

    F. N. Hooge, “1/fnoise is no surface effect,”Physics Letters A, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 139–140, 1969

    work page 1969

  44. [44]

    Impact of con- tact overlap on transconductance and noise in organic electrochemical transistors,

    A. G. Polyravas, V . F. Curto, N. Schaefer, A. Bonaccini Calia, A. Guimera-Brunet, J. A. Garrido, and G. G. Malliaras, “Impact of con- tact overlap on transconductance and noise in organic electrochemical transistors,”Flexible and Printed Electronics, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 044003, 2019

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Effect of channel thickness on noise in organic electrochemical transistors,

    A. G. Polyravas, N. Schaefer, V . F. Curto, A. Bonaccini Calia, A. Guimera-Brunet, J. A. Garrido, and G. G. Malliaras, “Effect of channel thickness on noise in organic electrochemical transistors,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 117, no. 7, p. 073302, 2020

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Low frequency noise and drift in ion sensitive field effect transistors,

    C. G. Jakobson, M. Feinsod, and Y . Nemirovsky, “Low frequency noise and drift in ion sensitive field effect transistors,”Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 68, no. 1–3, pp. 134–139, 2000

    work page 2000

  47. [47]

    Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference,

    E. B. Wilson, “Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 22, no. 158, pp. 209–212, 1927

    work page 1927

  48. [48]

    Elec- trochemical detection of dopamine via assisted ion transfer at nanopipet electrode using cyclic voltammetry,

    M. L. Colombo, S. McNeil, N. Iwai, A. Chang, and M. Shen, “Elec- trochemical detection of dopamine via assisted ion transfer at nanopipet electrode using cyclic voltammetry,”Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 163, no. 4, p. H3072, 2015

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Determination of diffusion coefficients by flow injection analysis,

    G. Gerhardt and R. N. Adams, “Determination of diffusion coefficients by flow injection analysis,”Analytical Chemistry, vol. 54, no. 14, pp. 2618–2620, 1982

    work page 1982

  50. [50]

    Kinetic and equilibrium binding characterization of aptamers to small molecules using a label-free, sensitive, and scalable platform,

    A. L. Chang, M. McKeague, J. C. Liang, and C. D. Smolke, “Kinetic and equilibrium binding characterization of aptamers to small molecules using a label-free, sensitive, and scalable platform,”Analytical Chem- istry, vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 3273–3278, 2014

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    Electrochemical quantitation of DNA immobilized on gold,

    A. B. Steel, T. M. Herne, and M. J. Tarlov, “Electrochemical quantitation of DNA immobilized on gold,”Analytical Chemistry, vol. 70, no. 22, pp. 4670–4677, 1998

    work page 1998

  52. [52]

    Transmitter and receiver architectures for molecular communications: A survey on physical design with modulation, coding, and detection techniques,

    M. Kuscu, E. Dinc, B. A. Bilgin, H. Ramezani, and O. B. Akan, “Transmitter and receiver architectures for molecular communications: A survey on physical design with modulation, coding, and detection techniques,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 1302–1341, 2019

    work page 2019

  53. [53]

    Frequency-domain model of microfluidic molecular communication channels with graphene BioFET-based re- ceivers,

    A. Abdali and M. Kuscu, “Frequency-domain model of microfluidic molecular communication channels with graphene BioFET-based re- ceivers,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 4564–4576, 2024. Hongbin Ni(Member, IEEE) received the B.Eng. degree in Mechatronic Engineering from The Uni- versity of Manchester, U.K., in 2021, and the M.Sc. d...

    work page 2024