pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.11073 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

An Argument-Principle Based Stability Assessment Method for Grey-Box DFIG Systems

Tao Zhang , Zhiguo Hao , Songhao Yang , Hongyue Ma , Baohui Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords DFIGgrey-box systemstability criterionargument principleMIMOfrequency sweepingreturn difference matrixsmall-signal stability
0
0 comments X

The pith

An argument-principle criterion assesses stability of grey-box DFIG systems using only frequency response data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a stability assessment method for doubly fed induction generator systems that appear as grey-box MIMO plants because of commercial confidentiality and frequency coupling. Frequency sweeping first extracts the MIMO frequency-response data and the determinant of the return difference matrix; the argument principle is then applied to the trajectory of that determinant to decide stability without any white-box model. A related procedure extracts the dominant critical poles directly from the same trajectory. The method therefore enables stability checks on commercial DFIG installations where internal details remain unavailable, and the paper confirms the approach through both simulation and hardware-in-the-loop tests.

Core claim

The argument-principle based stability criterion determines system stability from the trajectory of the determinant of the return difference matrix acquired via frequency sweeping, and applies directly to grey-box MIMO DFIG systems without requiring complete internal models.

What carries the argument

The determinant trajectory of the return difference matrix, whose winding number around the origin via the argument principle indicates the number of right-half-plane poles.

If this is right

  • The method works for any grey-box MIMO system where frequency sweeping can acquire the necessary data.
  • It provides both a stability verdict and dominant-mode estimation from the same measurements.
  • Simulation and hardware-in-the-loop tests confirm its effectiveness for DFIG systems.
  • Practical concerns such as model selection and estimation accuracy are addressed in the analysis.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same trajectory-based approach could be applied to other renewable converters whose controls are treated as black boxes.
  • If frequency response data can be collected online, the method might support continuous stability monitoring on operating wind farms.
  • Direct comparison against eigenvalue results from white-box DFIG models would quantify the accuracy cost of the grey-box route.

Load-bearing premise

Frequency sweeping must accurately obtain both the MIMO model of the black-box part and the determinant of the return difference matrix.

What would settle it

A controlled test on a DFIG system known to be unstable that the method incorrectly classifies as stable, or the reverse.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11073 by Baohui Zhang, Hongyue Ma, Songhao Yang, Tao Zhang, Zhiguo Hao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The schematic diagram of the Argument principle. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Diagram of DFIG connected to AC grid. Noting that the matrix determinant equals the product of all eigenvalues, the Argument principle to a function matrix can be written as 1 2π ∆argD(s) = N(D(s), Γ) − P(D(s), Γ), (5) where D(s) is the determinant of matrix F(s). Eq. (5) illustrates that the argument of a scalar function D(s) can reflect the zero-pole distribution of F(s). B. Customized Argument Principle… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic diagram of the function trajectory. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The IDTA diagram. Square: last intersection; Shadow: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Equivalent simplified model of the grid-tied DFIG [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The stability assessment approach for the grey-box [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows the DT curve when Krp = 0.1. In the IDTA diagram shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The simulated current waveforms when the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: GNC curves for the DFIG system under different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The A-phase current waveforms. is set to 0.15, and a voltage disturbance is superimposed to the system from 0.2s to 0.5s. It can be found that the current waveform gradually converges after the disturbance. According to FFT analysis results and waveform convergence characteristics, the system’s natural resonance frequency is about 55.0Hz, and the time constant is 4.3s. The above simulations show that the … view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Black-box DFIG frequency-coupled model obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The trajectory characteristics of D(s) under different Cs. calculation results in TABLE V, the assessment results for the target system’s damping and oscillation frequency are acceptable. Note that the DFIG’s frequency coupling in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Experimental waveforms of the system when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Experimental waveforms of the system when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Data processing under different Cs. Square and circle: discrete data; Solid line: piecewise linear interpolation; Dashed line: cubic polynomial fitting; Dash-dotted line: Lagrange interpolation; Grey dashed line: zero line. TABLE VII: Comparison of the calculated critical pole values Cs 800µF 600µF Error (Real & Imag) Experimental Data 2.174+28.903i 3.226+32.673i - Piecewise linear interpolation 1.456+28.… view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: IDTA diagrams under different wind speeds. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_21.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Considerable efforts have been made to analyze the small-signal stability of doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) systems. However, commercial confidentiality and frequency coupling make the DFIG system a grey-box multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) system with highly challenging stability analysis. This paper proposes an Argument-principle based stability assessment method to analyze the stability of the grey-box DFIG system. The frequency sweeping technique is first used to acquire the MIMO model of the black-box device, as well as the determinant of the system's return difference matrix. Then a stability criterion based on the determinant trajectory is presented. This criterion applies to the stability analysis of grey-box MIMO systems without detailed system models. Further, acritical-pole estimation method with trajectory information is developed to assess the dominant mode of the target system. The simulation and hardware-in-loop experiment results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Finally, some concerns about this method, such as model selection, estimation errors and application potential, are thoroughly analyzed and clarified.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an argument-principle based stability assessment method for grey-box MIMO DFIG systems. It uses frequency sweeping to obtain the MIMO frequency-response matrix and the determinant of the return difference matrix, applies a stability criterion based on the determinant trajectory to determine stability without requiring detailed internal models, develops a critical-pole estimation technique using trajectory information, validates the approach via simulations and hardware-in-the-loop experiments, and analyzes concerns including model selection, estimation errors, and application potential.

Significance. If the core mapping from measured determinant trajectory to winding number and pole estimates proves robust, the method would provide a practical, model-free tool for stability analysis of commercial DFIG systems where internal details are unavailable due to confidentiality. This is relevant for power-system studies involving frequency-coupled MIMO renewable devices; the explicit treatment of estimation errors and the pole-estimation extension are positive features that strengthen applicability if quantitative validation is added.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results sections] Abstract and results sections: the claim that simulations and HIL experiments demonstrate effectiveness is not supported by quantitative metrics, error bounds on estimated poles, or direct comparisons against white-box eigenvalue analysis; without these, the accuracy of the stability verdicts and dominant-mode estimates cannot be assessed.
  2. [Frequency-sweeping and determinant-trajectory sections] Frequency-sweeping and determinant-trajectory sections: the load-bearing assumption that sweeping accurately recovers the true determinant trajectory (necessary for correct winding-number counts via the argument principle) is only qualitatively discussed; specific bounds on how finite resolution, noise, PLL-induced coupling, or out-of-band dynamics perturb the argument change or pole-location estimates are required to confirm the method works for DFIG systems.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Method description] Clarify the exact definition and computation of the return-difference determinant in the MIMO case to avoid ambiguity in the trajectory plot.
  2. [Validation] Add a table or figure comparing estimated critical poles against reference values from the simulation model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review. The comments highlight important aspects of validation and robustness that we will strengthen in the revision. We address each major comment below and confirm that the revised manuscript will incorporate the suggested enhancements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and results sections] Abstract and results sections: the claim that simulations and HIL experiments demonstrate effectiveness is not supported by quantitative metrics, error bounds on estimated poles, or direct comparisons against white-box eigenvalue analysis; without these, the accuracy of the stability verdicts and dominant-mode estimates cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative support is necessary to rigorously substantiate the effectiveness claims. In the revised manuscript, we will add direct comparisons of stability verdicts and dominant-mode estimates against white-box eigenvalue analysis for all simulation cases. We will also report quantitative metrics including percentage errors in estimated pole locations, absolute errors in real and imaginary parts, and agreement percentages for stability assessments. For the HIL experiments, we will include error bounds derived from repeated measurements and trajectory sensitivity, along with numerical agreement metrics where reference data are available. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Frequency-sweeping and determinant-trajectory sections] Frequency-sweeping and determinant-trajectory sections: the load-bearing assumption that sweeping accurately recovers the true determinant trajectory (necessary for correct winding-number counts via the argument principle) is only qualitatively discussed; specific bounds on how finite resolution, noise, PLL-induced coupling, or out-of-band dynamics perturb the argument change or pole-location estimates are required to confirm the method works for DFIG systems.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current discussion is primarily qualitative and that explicit bounds are required for confidence in the method. In the revision, we will add a dedicated analysis subsection providing analytical and numerical bounds on perturbations to the determinant trajectory. This will include: (i) the effect of finite frequency resolution on argument change and winding-number accuracy, (ii) sensitivity to measurement noise with derived error bounds on pole estimates, (iii) impact of PLL-induced coupling on the return-difference determinant, and (iv) influence of out-of-band dynamics. These will be supported by both theoretical derivations and DFIG-specific numerical examples. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct application of argument principle to externally measured frequency-response data.

full rationale

The paper obtains the MIMO frequency-response matrix and return-difference determinant via frequency sweeping of the black-box device, then applies the classical argument principle to the resulting determinant trajectory to count origin encirclements. No equation reduces the stability verdict to a fitted parameter, self-referential definition, or self-citation chain; the central claim remains an independent mapping from measured data to winding number under the stated assumption that sweeping yields accurate trajectories. Simulation/HIL validation and error analysis are presented separately and do not close any definitional loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The method rests on standard assumptions from linear control theory and frequency-domain analysis; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Small-signal linearization around an operating point is valid for stability analysis.
    Standard premise for small-signal stability studies in power systems.
  • domain assumption Frequency response data obtained by sweeping can be assembled into an accurate MIMO transfer matrix.
    Core premise enabling the determinant calculation and argument-principle application.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5485 in / 1267 out tokens · 37918 ms · 2026-05-10T15:17:54.585770+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wind Report, Global Wind Energy Council of 2019, GWEC, Brussels, Belgium, Mar. 2020

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Mechanism study of DFIG-related SSR based on separate stator and rotor torque analysis,

    X. L. Dong, X. R. Xie, Y . D. Han, “Mechanism study of DFIG-related SSR based on separate stator and rotor torque analysis,” Proceedings of the CSEE, vol. 35, no. 19, pp. 4861-4869, Oct. 2015

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Approximate Intrinsic Voxel Structure for Point Cloud Simplification

    R. Moreno-S ´anchez, C. A. N ´u˜nez-Guti´errez, N. Visairo-Cruz, J. Hern´andez-Ram´ırez and J. Segundo-Ram ´ırez, “Understanding the Ori- gin of SSR in Series-Compensated DFIG-Based Wind Farms: Analysis Techniques and Tuning,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 117660-117672, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3104171

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2021.3104171 2021

  4. [4]

    Analysis of subsyn- chronous resonance in doubly-fed induction generator-based wind farms interfaced with gate–controlled series capacitor,

    H. A. Mohammadpour, A. Ghaderi, and E. Santi, “Analysis of subsyn- chronous resonance in doubly-fed induction generator-based wind farms interfaced with gate–controlled series capacitor,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1998–2011, Dec. 2014

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    Black-Box Impedance Prediction of Grid-Tied VSCs Under Variable Operating Conditions,

    Q. Qiu, Y . Huang, R. Ma, et al., “Black-Box Impedance Prediction of Grid-Tied VSCs Under Variable Operating Conditions,” IEEE Access , DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3139435

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2021.3139435 2021

  6. [6]

    Frequency Coupling Characteristic Modeling and Stability Analysis of Doubly Fed Induction Generator,

    Y . Xu, H. Nian, T. Wang, L. Chen and T. Zheng, “Frequency Coupling Characteristic Modeling and Stability Analysis of Doubly Fed Induction Generator,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1475-1486, Sept. 2018

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Modeling of grid-connected DFIG based wind turbines for DC-link voltage stability analysis,

    J. Hu, Y . Huang, D. Wang, et al., “Modeling of grid-connected DFIG based wind turbines for DC-link voltage stability analysis,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1325-1336, Oct. 2015

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Parameter setting strategy for the controller of the DFIG wind turbine considering the small-signal stability of power grids,

    Y . Jia, T. Huang, Y . Li, et al., “Parameter setting strategy for the controller of the DFIG wind turbine considering the small-signal stability of power grids,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 31287-31294, 2020

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Small-signal methods for AC distributed power systems-a re- view,

    J. Sun, “Small-signal methods for AC distributed power systems-a re- view,”IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2545-2554, Nov. 2009

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    Impedance-based analysis of control interactions in weak-grid-tied PMSG wind turbines,

    B. Liu, Z. Li, X. Zhang, et al., “Impedance-based analysis of control interactions in weak-grid-tied PMSG wind turbines,” IEEE Jour. Emer. Select. Top. Circu. Syste. , vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 90-98, Mar. 2021

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Impedance Modeling and Stability Analysis of DFIG Wind Farm with LCC-HVDC Transmission,

    M. Wang et al., “Impedance Modeling and Stability Analysis of DFIG Wind Farm with LCC-HVDC Transmission,” IEEE Jour. Emer. Select. Top. Circu. Syste., doi: 10.1109/JETCAS.2022.3144999

    work page doi:10.1109/jetcas.2022.3144999 2022

  12. [12]

    Stability Analysis of SSR in Multiple Wind Farms Connected to Series-Compensated Systems Using Impedance Network Model,

    H. Liu, X. Xie, X. Gao, H. Liu and Y . Li, “Stability Analysis of SSR in Multiple Wind Farms Connected to Series-Compensated Systems Using Impedance Network Model,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 3118-3128, May 2018

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Modeling and analysis of harmonic stability in an AC power-electronics-based power system,

    X. Wang, F. Blaabjerg, W. Wu, “Modeling and analysis of harmonic stability in an AC power-electronics-based power system,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 6421-6432, Dec. 2014

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    Stability criteria for AC power systems with regulated loads,

    M. Belkhayat, “Stability criteria for AC power systems with regulated loads,” West Lafayette, IN, USA, 1997

    work page 1997

  15. [15]

    AC stability analysis and DQ frame impedance specification in power-electronics-based distributed power systems,

    B. Wen, R. Burgos, D. Boroyevich, et al., “AC stability analysis and DQ frame impedance specification in power-electronics-based distributed power systems,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. , vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1455-1465, 2017

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    An algorithm and imple- mentation system for measuring impedance in the D-Q domain,

    G. Francis, R. Burgos, D. Boroyevich, et al., “An algorithm and imple- mentation system for measuring impedance in the D-Q domain,” Energy Conversion Congress & Exposition. IEEE , pp. 3221-3228. 2011

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Impedance identification procedure of three-phase balanced voltage source inverters based on transient response measurements,

    V . Valdivia, A. L ´azaro, A. Barrado, et al., “Impedance identification procedure of three-phase balanced voltage source inverters based on transient response measurements,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 3810-3816, Dec. 2011

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    Calculation of Frequency Domain Impedance of PMSG Based on State Space and Its Sensitivity Analysis Method,

    C. Li, F. Zeng, et al. “Calculation of Frequency Domain Impedance of PMSG Based on State Space and Its Sensitivity Analysis Method,” Power System Technology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 621-629, 2020

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Small-Signal Impedance Mea- surement of Power-Electronics-Based AC Power Systems Using Line-to- Line Current Injection,

    J. Huang, K. A. Corzine, M. Belkhaya. “Small-Signal Impedance Mea- surement of Power-Electronics-Based AC Power Systems Using Line-to- Line Current Injection,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 445-455, 2009

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    Apparent Impedance Analysis: A Small-Signal Method for Stability Analysis of Power Electronic-Based Systems,

    A. Rygg and M. Molinas, et al., “Apparent Impedance Analysis: A Small-Signal Method for Stability Analysis of Power Electronic-Based Systems,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. , vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1474-1486, 2017

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    A generalized Nyquist-type stability criterion for multivariable feedback systems,

    J. F. Barmanj, J. Katzenelson, “A generalized Nyquist-type stability criterion for multivariable feedback systems,” Int. J. Control, vol.20, no. 4, pp. 593-622, 1974

    work page 1974

  22. [22]

    A Shifted Frequency Impedance Model of Doubly Fed Induction Generator (DFIG)-Based Wind Farms and Its Applications on S 2SI Analysis,

    F. Shi, D. Shu, Z. Yan and Z. Song, “A Shifted Frequency Impedance Model of Doubly Fed Induction Generator (DFIG)-Based Wind Farms and Its Applications on S 2SI Analysis,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron. , vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 215-227, Jan. 2021

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Black-Box Impedance- Based Stability Assessment of Dynamic Interactions Between Converters and Grid,

    N. Cifuentes, M. Sun, R. Gupta and B. C. Pal, “Black-Box Impedance- Based Stability Assessment of Dynamic Interactions Between Converters and Grid,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 2976-2987, July 2022, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3128812

    work page doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2021.3128812 2022

  24. [24]

    Gershgorin-Circle Based Low-Complexity Generalized Nyquist Stability Criterion for DFIG Driven Wind Turbines,

    H. Xu, H. Wu, Z. Li, Q. Yan and F. Blaabjerg, “Gershgorin-Circle Based Low-Complexity Generalized Nyquist Stability Criterion for DFIG Driven Wind Turbines,” IEEE Jour. Emer. Select. Top. Circu. Syste., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29-40, March 2022, doi: 10.1109/JETCAS.2022.3151902

    work page doi:10.1109/jetcas.2022.3151902 2022

  25. [25]

    A strictly sufficient stability criterion for grid-connected converters based on impedance models and Gershgorin’s theorem,

    Y . Ren, X. Wang, L. Chen, et al., “A strictly sufficient stability criterion for grid-connected converters based on impedance models and Gershgorin’s theorem,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. , vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1606-1609, Jun. 2020

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    D–Q Impedance Based Stability Analysis and Parameter Design of Three Phase Inverter- Based AC Power Systems,

    W. Cao, Y . Ma, L. Yang, F. Wang, and L. M. Tolbert, “D–Q Impedance Based Stability Analysis and Parameter Design of Three Phase Inverter- Based AC Power Systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. , vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 6017–6028, Jul. 2017

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Argument Principle and Integral Relations: Hidden Links and Generalized Forms,

    Y . Xu, G. Chen, J. Chen and L. Qiu, “Argument Principle and Integral Relations: Hidden Links and Generalized Forms,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, doi: 10.1109/TAC.2022.3159565. JOURNAL OF IEEE, VOL. X, NO. X, XXX XXX 15

    work page doi:10.1109/tac.2022.3159565 2022

  28. [28]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1- 4684-3384-5_11

    F. Zhang, Matrix Theory . Springer New York, 1999, 10.1007/978-1- 4757-5797-2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1- 1999

  29. [29]

    Bevrani, M

    H. Bevrani, M. Watanabe, Y . Mitani, Power System Monitoring and Control, IEEE, 2014, pp.26-42

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Skogestad and I

    S. Skogestad and I. Postlethwaite, Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design , 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2005

    work page 2005

  31. [31]

    Computation of Transfer Function Dominant Zeros With Applications to Oscillation Damping Control of Large Power Systems,

    N. Martins, P. C. Pellanda, J. Rommes. “Computation of Transfer Function Dominant Zeros With Applications to Oscillation Damping Control of Large Power Systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. , vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1657-1664, 2007

    work page 2007

  32. [32]

    Impedance Modeling and Stability Analysis of DFIG Wind Farm With LCC-HVDC Transmission,

    M. Wang et al., “Impedance Modeling and Stability Analysis of DFIG Wind Farm With LCC-HVDC Transmission,” IEEE Jour. Emer. Select. Top. Circu. Syste., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 7-19, March 2022, doi: 10.1109/JET- CAS.2022.3144999

    work page doi:10.1109/jet- 2022

  33. [33]

    A Systematic Stability Enhancement Method for Microgrids With Unknown-Parameter Inverters,

    Y . Li, X. Wu, Z. Shuai, Q. Zhou, H. Chen and Z. J. Shen, “A Systematic Stability Enhancement Method for Microgrids With Unknown-Parameter Inverters,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron. , vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 3029-3043, March 2023, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2022.3219400

    work page doi:10.1109/tpel.2022.3219400 2023

  34. [34]

    A Modified Sequence- Domain Impedance Definition and Its Equivalence to the dq-Domain Impedance Definition for the Stability Analysis of AC Power Electronic Systems,

    A. Rygg, M. Molinas, C. Zhang and X. Cai, “A Modified Sequence- Domain Impedance Definition and Its Equivalence to the dq-Domain Impedance Definition for the Stability Analysis of AC Power Electronic Systems,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. , vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1383-1396, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2016.2588733

    work page doi:10.1109/jestpe.2016.2588733 2016

  35. [35]

    K . Liu, Y . Yao, Fundamentals of Linear System. Robust Control: Theory and Applications, 2016

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    PLL Based Sub-/Super- Synchronous Resonance Damping Controller for D-PMSG Wind Farm Integrated Power Systems,

    S. Yang, R. Shen, J. Shu, T. Zhang et al., “PLL Based Sub-/Super- Synchronous Resonance Damping Controller for D-PMSG Wind Farm Integrated Power Systems,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 2370-2384, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TEC.2022.3174057

    work page doi:10.1109/tec.2022.3174057 2022

  37. [37]

    Rapid Impedance Measurement Approach Based on Wideband Excitation for Single-Phase Four-Quadrant Converter of High-Speed Train,

    P. Pan, H. Hu, Z. He and Y . Li, “Rapid Impedance Measurement Approach Based on Wideband Excitation for Single-Phase Four-Quadrant Converter of High-Speed Train,”IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 70, pp. 1-11, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2021.3107048

    work page doi:10.1109/tim.2021.3107048 2021

  38. [38]

    Synchronization Stability of Grid-Connected VSC With Limits of PLL,

    Y . Li, Y . Tang, Y . Lu, F. Hua and Z. Du, “Synchronization Stability of Grid-Connected VSC With Limits of PLL,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2022, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3208244. Tao Zhang (S’20) received the B.S. degree in elec- trical engineering from Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China in 2017. And he is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree on electric...

    work page doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2022.3208244 2022

  39. [39]

    and Ph.D

    He received his B.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from Xi’an Jiaotong Univer- sity, Xi’an, China, in 1998 and 2007, respectively. He has been a Professor with the Electrical Engi- neering Department, Xi’an Jiaotong University since

    work page 1998

  40. [40]

    Songhao Yang (S’18-M’19) was born in Shan- dong, China, in 1989

    His research interest includes protection and control of power systems and equipment. Songhao Yang (S’18-M’19) was born in Shan- dong, China, in 1989. He received the B.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China, in 2012 and 2019, respectively. Besides, he received the Ph.D. degree in electrical and ele...

    work page 1989