Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 32 references

Angle-based Localization and Rigidity Maintenance Control for Multi-Robot Networks

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-05-10 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In multi-robot networks, infinitesimal bearing rigidity in SE(d) holds exactly when the framework is infinitesimally angle rigid and each robot obtains at least d-1 bearing measurements.

desk verdict The claimed equivalence between infinitesimal bearing rigidity and angle rigidity fails in 3D because two body-frame bearings per robot leave a rotational freedom that changes bearings without altering the angle. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.11754 v2 submitted 2026-04-13 eess.SY cs.ROcs.SY

J. Francisco Presenza , Leonardo J. Colombo , Juan I. Giribet , Ignacio Mas This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SYcs.ROcs.SY
keywords multi-robotsystemsanglerigiditybearingdistributedlocalizationmaintenanceswitchingtopologiesgradientcontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves an equivalence between two forms of rigidity for directed sensing graphs using body-frame measurements in two and three dimensions. Specifically, bearing rigidity is equivalent to angle rigidity plus a minimum of d-1 bearings per robot. The equivalence underpins a distributed localization algorithm that converges exponentially under switching graphs whenever angle rigidity is present. A rigidity eigenvalue and gradient controller then allow the team to maintain enough rigidity to continue localizing while carrying out assigned tasks. This approach matters for robot teams because it relies only on local angle data rather than positions or distances.

What carries the argument

The if-and-only-if equivalence between infinitesimal angle rigidity and bearing rigidity when each robot has at least d-1 bearings; this equivalence supports both the localization stability proof and the design of the maintenance controller.

What would settle it

A specific directed graph configuration in SE(2) where each agent has exactly one bearing, the framework satisfies infinitesimal angle rigidity, yet the bearing rigidity matrix has a kernel larger than the rigid motions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is that a framework in SE(d) is infinitesimally bearing rigid if and only if it is infinitesimally angle rigid and each robot obtains at least d-1 bearing measurements (d in {2, 3}). Using this, the paper develops a distributed angle-based localization scheme with local exponential stability under switching sensing graphs, needing only infinitesimal angle rigidity in the topologies visited. For practical sensing limits, the angle rigidity eigenvalue is defined to assess rigidity strength, and a decentralized gradient-based controller is given that executes mission commands while keeping rigidity above a sufficient level.

Load-bearing premise

The sensing graphs that occur remain infinitesimally angle rigid and body-frame bearings can be measured without occlusion or range restrictions.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims to prove an equivalence between infinitesimal bearing rigidity and infinitesimal angle rigidity for frameworks in SE(d) (d=2,3) when each robot obtains at least d-1 body-frame bearing measurements on directed graphs. Building on this, it proposes a distributed angle-based localization algorithm with local exponential stability under switching topologies (provided the visited graphs remain infinitesimally angle rigid), introduces an 'angle rigidity eigenvalue' as a scalar metric of rigidity degree, and develops a decentralized gradient controller that maintains sufficient rigidity while executing mission tasks. The claims are supported by theoretical derivations and numerical simulations.

Significance. If the equivalence and stability results hold, the work offers a pathway to rigidity-based multi-robot coordination using only local angle measurements, which can be advantageous under sensing constraints compared to full bearing or distance data. The rigidity-maintenance controller and eigenvalue metric provide a concrete tool for handling configuration-dependent sensing graphs. The simulations demonstrate practical feasibility, and the distributed nature of the schemes aligns with scalability needs in the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / equivalence theorem] Abstract and the section proving the equivalence: the stated iff relationship for d=3 (requiring only two bearings per robot) appears vulnerable to the following counterexample. Two body-frame bearings define a single invariant angle; a one-parameter family of infinitesimal rotations about the axis that preserves this angle can alter the individual bearing directions without changing the angle. This implies the kernel of the bearing rigidity matrix can strictly contain the kernel of the angle rigidity matrix plus the trivial SE(3) motions, violating the 'if' direction of the claimed equivalence. The 'only if' direction is immediate, but the numerical threshold d-1 is insufficient in 3-D. Please supply the full proof (including explicit null-space characterizations) and address this potential discrepancy.
  2. [Localization scheme] Section on localization under switching topologies: the local exponential stability claim rests on the assumption that every visited sensing graph remains infinitesimally angle rigid and that body-frame bearings are always available. No explicit dwell-time condition, common Lyapunov function, or robustness margin against brief violations of angle rigidity is provided. This assumption is load-bearing for the stability guarantee and should be stated as a hypothesis with a discussion of how it can be enforced in practice.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The term 'angle rigidity eigenvalue' is introduced without an explicit definition or formula in the abstract; a one-sentence definition or reference to its equation would improve readability.
  2. [Rigidity definitions] Notation for the bearing and angle rigidity matrices should be introduced consistently; currently the abstract jumps between 'bearing rigidity' and 'angle rigidity' without clarifying the precise matrix constructions used in the proofs.
  3. [Numerical results] Simulations: specify the exact switching sequence, noise levels (if any), and quantitative metrics (e.g., convergence rates) used to validate the exponential stability claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below with clarifications and proposed revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / equivalence theorem] Abstract and the section proving the equivalence: the stated iff relationship for d=3 (requiring only two bearings per robot) appears vulnerable to the following counterexample. Two body-frame bearings define a single invariant angle; a one-parameter family of infinitesimal rotations about the axis that preserves this angle can alter the individual bearing directions without changing the angle. This implies the kernel of the bearing rigidity matrix can strictly contain the kernel of the angle rigidity matrix plus the trivial SE(3) motions, violating the 'if' direction of the claimed equivalence. The 'only if' direction is immediate, but the numerical threshold d-1 is insufficient in 3-D. Please supply the full proof (including explicit null-space characterizations) and address this potential discrepancy.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this subtlety in the 3-D case. The proposed counterexample does not violate the claimed equivalence because any infinitesimal rotation about the axis that preserves the angle between two bearings while altering their individual directions would necessarily lie outside the kernel of the angle rigidity matrix (as it changes the oriented bearing vectors in a manner inconsistent with angle preservation). Our proof proceeds by explicit null-space characterization: the kernel of the angle rigidity matrix consists precisely of the trivial SE(3) motions plus any non-trivial motions that would violate bearing directions, and the condition of at least two bearings per robot ensures that the bearing rigidity matrix has identical kernel dimension. The 'if' direction follows from showing that angle rigidity plus the bearing count forces the bearing rigidity matrix to have full rank deficiency equal to the SE(3) trivial motions. We will include the complete, expanded proof with these null-space details in the revised manuscript. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Localization scheme] Section on localization under switching topologies: the local exponential stability claim rests on the assumption that every visited sensing graph remains infinitesimally angle rigid and that body-frame bearings are always available. No explicit dwell-time condition, common Lyapunov function, or robustness margin against brief violations of angle rigidity is provided. This assumption is load-bearing for the stability guarantee and should be stated as a hypothesis with a discussion of how it can be enforced in practice.

    Authors: We agree that the local exponential stability result depends critically on the visited graphs remaining infinitesimally angle rigid. In the revision we will explicitly state this as a standing hypothesis on the switching signal. We will also add a practical discussion on enforcement: the angle rigidity eigenvalue (introduced in the rigidity-maintenance section) can serve as a decentralized monitor; if it drops below a positive threshold, the controller can pause mission tasks or request topology reconfiguration. Because the set of admissible graphs is finite and each yields a uniformly positive lower bound on the relevant eigenvalues, local exponential stability holds without an explicit dwell-time condition or common Lyapunov function; we will include a remark clarifying this point and note that brief violations can be handled by the robustness margin inherent in the exponential decay rate. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; equivalence and stability claims are independently derived from rigidity definitions

full rationale

The paper states it demonstrates the iff equivalence between infinitesimal bearing rigidity and angle rigidity (plus d-1 bearings) via direct analysis of directed graphs and body-frame measurements in SE(d). The localization scheme and exponential stability under switching topologies are then built on the angle-rigidity condition alone. No quoted step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter, renames a known result, or loads the central theorem on a self-citation chain whose own justification is internal to the present work. The angle-rigidity eigenvalue and gradient controller are presented as new metrics and laws without self-referential closure.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The work relies on standard infinitesimal rigidity concepts from graph theory and SE(d) kinematics; it introduces the angle rigidity eigenvalue as a new scalar metric but provides no independent evidence for its utility beyond the paper's own simulations.

assumptions (2)
  • standard math Standard definitions of infinitesimal rigidity for frameworks in SE(d)
    Invoked to establish the angle-bearing equivalence.
  • domain assumption Body-frame bearing measurements are available and noise-free
    Required for the localization scheme and stability proof.
invented entities (1)
  • angle rigidity eigenvalue
    purpose: Scalar metric quantifying the degree of angle rigidity
    Introduced to guide the gradient-based maintenance controller

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Angle-based Localization and Rigidity Maintenance Control for Multi-Robot Networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.11754

@misc{pith2026260411754,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Angle-based Localization and Rigidity Maintenance Control for Multi-Robot Networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.11754}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.11754}
}
abstract

In this work, we study angle-based localization and rigidity maintenance control for multi-robot networks. First, we establish the relationship between angle rigidity and bearing rigidity considering \textit{directed} sensing graphs and \textit{body-frame} bearing measurements in both $2$ and $3$-\textit{dimensional space}. In particular, we demonstrate that a framework in $\mathrm{SE}(d)$ is infinitesimally bearing rigid if and only if it is infinitesimally angle rigid and each robot obtains at least $d-1$ bearing measurements ($d \in \{2, 3\}$). Building on these findings, this paper proposes a distributed angle-based localization scheme and establishes local exponential stability under switching sensing graphs, requiring only infinitesimal angle rigidity across the visited topologies. Then, since the set of available angles strongly depends on the robots' spatial configuration due to sensing constraints, we investigate rigidity maintenance control. The \textit{angle rigidity eigenvalue} is presented as a metric for the degree of rigidity. A decentralized gradient-based controller capable of executing mission-specific commands while maintaining a sufficient level of angle rigidity is proposed. Simulations were conducted to evaluate the scheme's effectiveness and practicality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11754 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Configuration degeneracy: (a) and (c) de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. State of the system at different stages (second [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Control performance metrics (second case). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Control performance metrics. Closed-form expressions for the rigidity eigenvalue and its gradient were derived. Subsequently, a decentral￾ized rigidity maintenance controller was proposed and validated through simulations for the application of co￾operative multi-targe…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Princeton University Press, 2008

    P-A Absil, Robert Mahony, and Rodolphe Sepul- chre.Optimization algorithms on matrix mani- folds. Princeton University Press, 2008

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    Bearing-based distributed pose estimation for 10 multi-agent networks.IEEE Control Systems Let- ters, 7:2617–2622, 2023

    Mouaad Boughellaba and Abdelhamid Tayebi. Bearing-based distributed pose estimation for 10 multi-agent networks.IEEE Control Systems Let- ters, 7:2617–2622, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Distributed attitude estimation for multiagent sys- tems onso(3).IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 70(1):657–664, 2025

    Mouaad Boughellaba and Abdelhamid Tayebi. Distributed attitude estimation for multiagent sys- tems onso(3).IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 70(1):657–664, 2025

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Bearing-only distributed localization: A unified barycentric approach.Automatica, 133:109834, 2021

    Kun Cao, Zhimin Han, Zhiyun Lin, and Lihua Xie. Bearing-only distributed localization: A unified barycentric approach.Automatica, 133:109834, 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Multi-robot active sensing for bear- ing formations

    Nicola De Carli, Paolo Salaris, and Paolo Robuffo Giordano. Multi-robot active sensing for bear- ing formations. In2023 International Symposium on Multi-Robot and Multi-Agent Systems (MRS), pages 184–190, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Triangular angle rigidity for distributed localization in 2d.Automatica, 143:110414, 2022

    Liangming Chen. Triangular angle rigidity for distributed localization in 2d.Automatica, 143:110414, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    3-d network localization using angle measurements and reduced communication

    Liangming Chen, Kun Cao, Lihua Xie, Xiaolei Li, and Mir Feroskhan. 3-d network localization using angle measurements and reduced communication. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 70:2402– 2415, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Simultaneous localization and formation using angle-only measurements in 2d

    Liangming Chen, Lihua Xie, Xiaolei Li, Xu Fang, and Mir Feroskhan. Simultaneous localization and formation using angle-only measurements in 2d. Automatica, 146:110605, 2022

    work page 2022

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    On the observability of relative positions in left- invariant multi-agent control systems and its ap- plication to formation control

    Leonardo Colombo, Hector Garcia de Marina, Mar´ ıa Barbero Li˜ n´ an, and David Mart´ ın de Diego. On the observability of relative positions in left- invariant multi-agent control systems and its ap- plication to formation control. In2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and ...

    2019

  2. [10]

    On the equiv- alence between signed angle rigidity and bearing rigidity

    Jinpeng Huang and Gangshan Jing. On the equiv- alence between signed angle rigidity and bearing rigidity. In2025 IEEE 64th Conference on Deci- sion and Control (CDC), pages 5935–5940, 2025

    2025

  3. [11]

    Angle-based sensor network localization.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 67(2):840– 855, 2021

    Gangshan Jing, Changhuang Wan, and Ran Dai. Angle-based sensor network localization.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 67(2):840– 855, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    Angle- based shape determination theory of planar graphs with application to formation stabiliza- tion.Automatica, 105:117–129, 2019

    Gangshan Jing, Guofeng Zhang, Heung Wing Joseph Lee, and Long Wang. Angle- based shape determination theory of planar graphs with application to formation stabiliza- tion.Automatica, 105:117–129, 2019

    2019

  5. [13]

    Angle-based localiza- tion and rigidity maintenance control for multi- robot networks [simulation demo].https:// youtu.be/p-fdysUBRKc, 2026

    LAR-UBA and CAR-CSIC. Angle-based localiza- tion and rigidity maintenance control for multi- robot networks [simulation demo].https:// youtu.be/p-fdysUBRKc, 2026. Accessed: 2026- 03-30

    2026

  6. [14]

    Angle-based localiza- tion and rigidity maintenance control for multi- robot networks [simulation demo].https:// youtu.be/ZeDnGq5eh_E, 2026

    LAR-UBA and CAR-CSIC. Angle-based localiza- tion and rigidity maintenance control for multi- robot networks [simulation demo].https:// youtu.be/ZeDnGq5eh_E, 2026. Accessed: 2026- 03-30

    2026

  7. [15]

    Lee.Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, volume 218 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics

    John M. Lee.Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, volume 218 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York, 2 edition, 2013

    2013

  8. [16]

    Distributed 3-d bearing-only orien- tation localization

    Spyridon Leonardos, Kostas Daniilidis, and Roberto Tron. Distributed 3-d bearing-only orien- tation localization. In2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 1834–1841, 2019

    2019

  9. [17]

    Glob- ally convergent distributed network localization using locally measured bearings.IEEE Transac- tions on Control of Network Systems, 7(1):245– 253, 2020

    Xiaolei Li, Xiaoyuan Luo, and Shiyu Zhao. Glob- ally convergent distributed network localization using locally measured bearings.IEEE Transac- tions on Control of Network Systems, 7(1):245– 253, 2020

    2020

  10. [18]

    Performance optimization of angle-based network localization

    Chenyang Liang, Liangming Chen, Yibei Li, Jie Mei, and Lihua Xie. Performance optimization of angle-based network localization. In2023 62nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 5159–5164, 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    Bearing rigidity theory in se(3)

    Giulia Michieletto, Angelo Cenedese, and Antonio Franchi. Bearing rigidity theory in se(3). In2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 5950–5955, 2016

    2016

  12. [20]

    A unified dissertation on bearing rigidity theory.IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, 8(4):1624–1636, 2021

    Giulia Michieletto, Angelo Cenedese, and Daniel Zelazo. A unified dissertation on bearing rigidity theory.IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, 8(4):1624–1636, 2021

    2021

  13. [21]

    On frame and orientation localization for relative sens- ing networks.Automatica, 49(1):206–213, 2013

    Giulia Piovan, Iman Shames, Barı¸ s Fidan, Francesco Bullo, and Brian DO Anderson. On frame and orientation localization for relative sens- ing networks.Automatica, 49(1):206–213, 2013

    2013

  14. [22]

    Francisco Presenza, Ignacio Mas, J

    J. Francisco Presenza, Ignacio Mas, J. Ig- nacio Alvarez-Hamelin, and Juan I. Giribet. Subframework-based bearing rigidity maintenance control in multirobot networks.IEEE Control Sys- tems Letters, 9:1249–1254, 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    Presenza, J

    Juan F. Presenza, J. Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin, Ig- nacio Mas, and Juan I. Giribet. Subframework- based rigidity control in multirobot networks. In 2022 American Control Conference (ACC), pages 3431–3436, 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    A rigidity-based de- centralized bearing formation controller for groups of quadrotor uavs

    Fabrizio Schiano, Antonio Franchi, Daniel Zelazo, and Paolo Robuffo Giordano. A rigidity-based de- centralized bearing formation controller for groups of quadrotor uavs. In2016 IEEE/RSJ Interna- tional Conference on Intelligent Robots and Sys- tems (IROS), pages 5099–5106, 2016

    2016

  17. [25]

    Bearing rigidity maintenance for formations of quadrotor uavs

    Fabrizio Schiano and Paolo Robuffo Giordano. Bearing rigidity maintenance for formations of quadrotor uavs. In2017 IEEE International 11 Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 1467–1474, 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    Zhiyong Sun, Changbin Yu, and Brian D. O. An- derson. Distributed optimization on proximity net- work rigidity via robotic movements. In2015 34th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), pages 6954– 6960, 2015

    2015

  19. [27]

    Anderson, and Hyo- Sung Ahn

    Quoc Van Tran, Brian D.O. Anderson, and Hyo- Sung Ahn. Pose localization of leader–follower net- works with direction measurements.Automatica, 120:109125, 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    Bearing-based formation con- trol and network localization via global orientation estimation

    Minh Hoang Trinh, Byung-Hun Lee, Mengbin Ye, and Hyo-Sung Ahn. Bearing-based formation con- trol and network localization via global orientation estimation. In2018 IEEE conference on control technology and applications (CCTA), pages 1084–

  21. [29]

    Distributed orientation localization of multi-agent systems in 3-dimensional space with direction-only measurements

    Quoc Van Tran, Hyo-Sung Ahn, and Brian DO Anderson. Distributed orientation localization of multi-agent systems in 3-dimensional space with direction-only measurements. In2018 IEEE Con- ference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 2883–2889. IEEE, 2018

    2018

  22. [30]

    B¨ ulthoff, and Paolo Robuffo Giordano

    Daniel Zelazo, Antonio Franchi, Heinrich H. B¨ ulthoff, and Paolo Robuffo Giordano. Decen- tralized rigidity maintenance control with range measurements for multi-robot systems.The Inter- national Journal of Robotics Research, 34(1):105– 128, 2015

    2015

  23. [31]

    Rigidity theory in se (2) for unscaled relative position estimation using only bearing measurements

    Daniel Zelazo, Antonio Franchi, and Paolo Robuffo Giordano. Rigidity theory in se (2) for unscaled relative position estimation using only bearing measurements. In2014 European Control Confer- ence (ECC), pages 2703–2708. IEEE, 2014

    2014

  24. [32]

    Bearing rigid- ity theory and its applications for control and estimation of network systems: Life beyond dis- tance rigidity.IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 39(2):66–83, 2019

    Shiyu Zhao and Daniel Zelazo. Bearing rigid- ity theory and its applications for control and estimation of network systems: Life beyond dis- tance rigidity.IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 39(2):66–83, 2019. A Appendix A.1 A useful lemma Lemma 1Letx, y 1, y2, z1, z2 ∈R 3 such th...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed May 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.