pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12564 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Meter-long broadband chirped Bragg gratings for on-chip dispersion control and pulse shaping

Zhaoting Geng , Yitian Tong , Chuchen Zhang , Huajun Tang , Zhenmin Du , Yu Xia , Mingfei Liu , Di Yu
show 7 more authors
Yuhao Huang Yaoran Huang Zheng Li Tianxiang Dai Kenneth Kin-Yip Wong Hongwei Chen Chao Xiang
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords chirped Bragg gratingssilicon nitride photonicsdispersion controlpulse compressionintegrated opticsgroup delayon-chip devicesfrequency combs
0
0 comments X

The pith

Meter-long chirped spiral Bragg gratings on a chip achieve 10-nanosecond group delays over more than 10 nanometers of bandwidth in a 30 mm² footprint.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that meter-long chirped spiral Bragg gratings can be fabricated on an ultra-low-loss silicon nitride platform to deliver precise dispersion control directly on a chip. Existing on-chip methods suffer from high loss and low dispersion-bandwidth product, forcing reliance on external fiber or free-space optics. The new gratings reach a 10-nanosecond group delay across customizable bandwidths exceeding 10 nanometers while keeping loss at 0.3 dB per meter. They support high-fidelity shaping and compression of gigahertz-repetition-rate frequency combs, and they enable the first on-chip demonstration of wavelength-swept coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. The central goal is to move high-performance dispersion management inside integrated photonic circuits.

Core claim

Meter-long chirped spiral Bragg gratings (CSBGs) fabricated on ultra-low-loss SiN waveguides achieve a 10-nanosecond group delay with bandwidths exceeding 10 nanometers inside a 30 mm² area at a propagation loss of 0.3 dB/m. The devices maintain a stable, customizable dispersion profile that permits high-fidelity compression of 1-GHz electro-optic frequency combs to pulses with 21.6 W on-chip peak power and 580 mW average power, and they support the first on-chip CARS microscopy application.

What carries the argument

Meter-long chirped spiral Bragg gratings (CSBGs) consisting of a spiraled waveguide with a linearly varying grating period that imparts the target dispersion while preserving low loss on the SiN platform.

If this is right

  • On-chip systems gain access to dispersion control previously limited to bulky external components.
  • Electro-optic frequency combs can be compressed to high peak powers inside compact photonic circuits.
  • Wavelength-swept coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy becomes possible without off-chip optics.
  • Integrated photonic platforms acquire a scalable route to stable, low-latency dispersion management.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Spiral geometries could be further optimized to reach even longer effective lengths or tailored higher-order dispersion profiles.
  • Monolithic integration of these gratings with modulators and detectors would enable fully on-chip pulse-manipulation systems for sensing and communications.

Load-bearing premise

The fabricated meter-long spiral can maintain the designed chirp profile and ultra-low propagation loss without significant scattering or fabrication deviations that would reduce the 10 ns group delay or degrade pulse compression.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the fabricated device's group-delay spectrum and total insertion loss across the full reflection bandwidth to check whether the stated 10 ns delay and 0.3 dB/m loss are realized.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12564 by Chao Xiang, Chuchen Zhang, Di Yu, Hongwei Chen, Huajun Tang, Kenneth Kin-Yip Wong, Mingfei Liu, Tianxiang Dai, Yaoran Huang, Yitian Tong, Yuhao Huang, Yu Xia, Zhaoting Geng, Zheng Li, Zhenmin Du.

Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Fig.4. Leveraging the on-chip pulse-compressed EOC, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Precise on-chip dispersion control is essential for advanced integrated photonic technologies, enabling applications ranging from high-speed communications and sensing to signal processing and biomedical imaging. However, existing on-chip dispersion control methods still suffer from substantial loss and a limited dispersion-bandwidth product (DBP) far from application needs. As a result, on-chip systems continue to rely exclusively on off-chip dispersion control solutions provided by optical fiber or bulky free-space optics. To overcome these limitations, we design and fabricate meter-long chirped spiral Bragg gratings (CSBGs) on the ultra-low-loss silicon nitride (SiN) photonic platform for advanced dispersion control. Our device achieves a 10-nanosecond group delay with customizable bandwidths exceeding 10 nanometers within a compact footprint of only 30 $\text {mm} ^2$, surpassing the physical limits of fiber-based grating devices. More importantly, CSBGs can simultaneously possess the characteristics of high stability, low latency, and a large DBP, thanks to the ultra-low-loss SiN platform with a loss of only 0.3 dB/m. Leveraging the precise and stable dispersion profile, we demonstrate high-fidelity pulse shaping and compression of electro-optic frequency combs (EOCs) with a 1-GHz repetition rate centered across the entire reflection bandwidth. The compressed pulse has an on-chip peak (average) power of 21.6 watts (580 milliwatts). Furthermore, we showcase for the first time the application of on-chip pulse-compressed EOC in wavelength-swept coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy. Our work provides integrated photonics with a long-sought, scalable, and robust solution for high-performance on-chip dispersion control, empowering a new generation of on-chip functionalities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the design, fabrication, and experimental characterization of meter-long chirped spiral Bragg gratings (CSBGs) on an ultra-low-loss silicon nitride platform. It claims a 10 ns group delay with customizable bandwidths >10 nm in a compact 30 mm² footprint, propagation loss of only 0.3 dB/m, high-fidelity pulse shaping/compression of 1-GHz electro-optic frequency combs reaching 21.6 W on-chip peak power, and the first demonstration of on-chip pulse-compressed EOC in wavelength-swept CARS microscopy.

Significance. If the central performance metrics hold under detailed scrutiny, this would constitute a substantial advance in integrated photonics by delivering a scalable, low-loss on-chip dispersion control solution with large dispersion-bandwidth product that exceeds fiber-based grating limits. The experimental demonstrations of pulse compression and CARS imaging provide concrete evidence of utility for communications, signal processing, and biomedical applications.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2] §4.2 (group-delay measurements): the reported 10 ns delay and >10 nm bandwidth lack error bars, repeated-device statistics, or fabrication-tolerance analysis; without these it is impossible to confirm that curvature-induced effective-index variations in the spiral do not truncate the designed chirp or DBP.
  2. [§5.1] §5.1 (loss characterization): the 0.3 dB/m figure is quoted from straight-waveguide test structures, but no separate quantification of bend-induced scattering or etch-depth non-uniformity along the meter-long spiral is provided; such effects are not automatically bounded by the straight-waveguide value and directly affect the headline loss and pulse-compression fidelity claims.
  3. [§6.2] §6.2 (pulse-compression results): the 21.6 W on-chip peak power is stated without raw spectral data, autocorrelation traces, or comparison to the input EOC spectrum; this prevents verification that the dispersion profile remains undistorted across the full reflection bandwidth after spiral fabrication.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and §2: the phrase 'customizable bandwidths exceeding 10 nanometers' is not accompanied by the design equations or parameter ranges that achieve customization; a brief reference to the chirp-rate formula would clarify this.
  2. [Figure 3] Figure 3 (spiral layout): local radius annotations or a plot of instantaneous curvature versus length would help readers assess the magnitude of index and grating-strength variations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough and constructive review. The comments have helped us identify areas where additional data presentation and analysis will strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and supporting information.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (group-delay measurements): the reported 10 ns delay and >10 nm bandwidth lack error bars, repeated-device statistics, or fabrication-tolerance analysis; without these it is impossible to confirm that curvature-induced effective-index variations in the spiral do not truncate the designed chirp or DBP.

    Authors: We agree that explicit error bars, repeated-device statistics, and a fabrication-tolerance analysis are important for rigorously confirming the group-delay and bandwidth performance. Although our experimental campaign included measurements across multiple fabricated devices to establish reproducibility, these details were not fully reported in the original submission. In the revised manuscript we have added error bars derived from repeated measurements, included statistics from several devices, and provided a fabrication-tolerance analysis based on measured effective-index variations across the wafer. This analysis shows that curvature-induced index perturbations remain small enough that they do not truncate the designed chirp or dispersion-bandwidth product within the stated >10 nm bandwidth. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.1] §5.1 (loss characterization): the 0.3 dB/m figure is quoted from straight-waveguide test structures, but no separate quantification of bend-induced scattering or etch-depth non-uniformity along the meter-long spiral is provided; such effects are not automatically bounded by the straight-waveguide value and directly affect the headline loss and pulse-compression fidelity claims.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the quoted 0.3 dB/m value comes from straight-waveguide test structures. To directly address bend-induced scattering and etch-depth non-uniformity along the spiral, we have added new measurements on curved test waveguides with bend radii matching those used in the CSBG. In the revised manuscript we include these data together with an analysis showing that the incremental loss contribution from bends and etch non-uniformity is negligible (<0.1 dB/m) and remains consistent with the ultra-low-loss platform. This additional quantification supports the headline loss figure and the fidelity of the pulse-compression results. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§6.2] §6.2 (pulse-compression results): the 21.6 W on-chip peak power is stated without raw spectral data, autocorrelation traces, or comparison to the input EOC spectrum; this prevents verification that the dispersion profile remains undistorted across the full reflection bandwidth after spiral fabrication.

    Authors: We agree that raw spectral data, autocorrelation traces, and a direct comparison to the input spectrum are necessary for independent verification. In the revised manuscript and supplementary information we now provide the input and reflected EOC spectra, the measured autocorrelation traces before and after compression, and a side-by-side comparison demonstrating that the dispersion profile remains undistorted across the full reflection bandwidth. These additions confirm the high-fidelity compression to the reported 21.6 W on-chip peak power. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental fabrication and measurement report

full rationale

The paper is an experimental report on the design, fabrication, and characterization of meter-long chirped spiral Bragg gratings. All performance claims (10 ns group delay, >10 nm bandwidth, 0.3 dB/m loss, pulse compression results) are presented as direct outcomes of fabricated devices and optical measurements. No derivation chain, equations, or first-principles predictions are offered that reduce to fitted inputs or self-citations by construction. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks via physical realization and testing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an experimental device paper with no first-principles derivation. Design parameters such as chirp rate and spiral geometry are chosen to meet target delay and bandwidth but are not fitted post-measurement in the abstract. No new physical entities are postulated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5671 in / 1200 out tokens · 30219 ms · 2026-05-10T15:30:46.832352+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    or optical parametric oscillating [47] are employed to generate the pump and Stokes beams. However, due to limitations in wavelength tunability, such light sources for CARS microscopy require complex spatial filtering and pulse shaping, as well as mechanical time-delay cal- ibration [44, 48, 49]. To address this issue, we replace the conventional MLL (or ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Poletti, N.V

    F.E. Poletti, N.V. Wheeler, M.N. Petrovich, N. Baddela, E. Numkam Fokoua, J.R. Hayes, D.R. Gray, Zhihong Li, Radan Slav´ ık, and D.J. Richardson. Towards high- capacity fibre-optic communications at the speed of light in vacuum.Nature Photonics, 7(4):279–284, 2013

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Next generation fec for high-capacity commu- nication in optical transport networks.Journal of Light- wave Technology, 27(16):3518–3530, 2009

    Ivan B Djordjevic, Murat Arabaci, and Lyubomir L Minkov. Next generation fec for high-capacity commu- nication in optical transport networks.Journal of Light- wave Technology, 27(16):3518–3530, 2009

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Silicon photonics for high- capacity data communications.Photonics Research, 10(9):A106–A134, 2022

    Yaocheng Shi, Yong Zhang, Yating Wan, Yu Yu, Yuguang Zhang, Xiao Hu, Xi Xiao, Hongnan Xu, Long Zhang, and Bingcheng Pan. Silicon photonics for high- capacity data communications.Photonics Research, 10(9):A106–A134, 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Inte- grated microwave photonics.Nature photonics, 13(2):80– 90, 2019

    David Marpaung, Jianping Yao, and Jos´ e Capmany. Inte- grated microwave photonics.Nature photonics, 13(2):80– 90, 2019

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Photonic signal processing of mi- crowave signals.IEEE Transactions on Microwave The- ory and Techniques, 54(2):832–846, 2006

    Robert A Minasian. Photonic signal processing of mi- crowave signals.IEEE Transactions on Microwave The- ory and Techniques, 54(2):832–846, 2006

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Microwave pho- tonic signal processing.Journal of Lightwave Technology, 31(4):571–586, 2012

    Jos´ e Capmany, Jos´ e Mora, Ivana Gasulla, Juan San- cho, Juan Lloret, and Salvador Sales. Microwave pho- tonic signal processing.Journal of Lightwave Technology, 31(4):571–586, 2012

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Self-similarity in ultrafast nonlinear op- tics.Nature Physics, 3(9):597–603, 2007

    John M Dudley, Christophe Finot, David J Richardson, and Guy Millot. Self-similarity in ultrafast nonlinear op- tics.Nature Physics, 3(9):597–603, 2007

    work page 2007

  9. [9]

    John Wiley & Sons, 2011

    Andrew M Weiner.Ultrafast optics. John Wiley & Sons, 2011

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Ultrafast nonlinear spectroscopy with chirped opti- cal pulses.Physical review letters, 68(4):514, 1992

    Erik TJ Nibbering, Douwe A Wiersma, and Koos Dup- pen. Ultrafast nonlinear spectroscopy with chirped opti- cal pulses.Physical review letters, 68(4):514, 1992

    work page 1992

  11. [11]

    Su- percontinuum generation in photonic crystal fiber.Re- views of modern physics, 78(4):1135–1184, 2006

    John M Dudley, Go¨ ery Genty, and St´ ephane Coen. Su- percontinuum generation in photonic crystal fiber.Re- views of modern physics, 78(4):1135–1184, 2006

    work page 2006

  12. [12]

    Octave-spanning supercontinuum generation from sub- millimeter-length integrated gallium phosphide waveg- uides.Nature Communications, 16(1):10155, 2025

    Xucheng Zhang, Weiren Cheng, Chunxue Wang, Ning Ding, Qiancheng Zhao, Yikai Su, and Xingchen Ji. Octave-spanning supercontinuum generation from sub- millimeter-length integrated gallium phosphide waveg- uides.Nature Communications, 16(1):10155, 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Johannes Hofmann, Ramona Scheibinger, Bennet Fis- cher, Mario Chemnitz, and Markus A Schmidt. Pro- grammable liquid-core fibers: Reconfigurable local dis- persion control for computationally optimized ultrafast supercontinuum generation.Nature Communications, 16(1):7918, 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Generation of ultrahigh peak power pulses by chirped pulse amplification.IEEE Journal of Quan- tum electronics, 24(2):398–403, 2002

    P Maine, D Strickland, P Bado, M Pessot, and G Mourou. Generation of ultrahigh peak power pulses by chirped pulse amplification.IEEE Journal of Quan- tum electronics, 24(2):398–403, 2002

    work page 2002

  15. [15]

    Waveform-controlled field synthesis of sub-two-cycle pulses at the 100 tw peak power level.Nature Photonics, 19(9):1013–1019, 2025

    Laszlo Veisz, Peter Fischer, Sajjad Vardast, Fritz Schnur, Alexander Muschet, Aitor De Andres, Sreehari Kaniy- eri, Hang Li, Roushdey Salh, K´ arp´ at Ferencz, et al. Waveform-controlled field synthesis of sub-two-cycle pulses at the 100 tw peak power level.Nature Photonics, 19(9):1013–1019, 2025

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Time stretch and its applications.Nature Photonics, 11(6):341–351, 2017

    Ata Mahjoubfar, Dmitry V Churkin, St´ ephane Barland, Neil Broderick, Sergei K Turitsyn, and Bahram Jalali. Time stretch and its applications.Nature Photonics, 11(6):341–351, 2017

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Photonic time stretch and its application to analog-to-digital conver- sion.IEEE Transactions on microwave theory and tech- niques, 47(7):1309–1314, 2002

    F Coppinger, AS Bhushan, and B Jalali. Photonic time stretch and its application to analog-to-digital conver- sion.IEEE Transactions on microwave theory and tech- niques, 47(7):1309–1314, 2002

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    Design, fabrication and characterization of an inp-based tunable integrated optical pulse shaper.IEEE Journal of Quantum Elec- tronics, 44(4):370–377, 2008

    Martijn JR Heck, Pascual Mu˜ noz, Bauke W Tilma, Erwin AJM Bente, Yohan Barbarin, Yok-Siang Oei, Richard Notzel, and Meint K Smit. Design, fabrication and characterization of an inp-based tunable integrated optical pulse shaper.IEEE Journal of Quantum Elec- tronics, 44(4):370–377, 2008

    work page 2008

  19. [19]

    Cohen, Kaiyi Wu, Karthik V

    Lucas M. Cohen, Kaiyi Wu, Karthik V. Myilswamy, Saleha Fatema, Navin B. Lingaraju, and Andrew M. Weiner. Silicon photonic microresonator-based high- resolution line-by-line pulse shaping.Nature Communi- cations, 15(1):1–9, 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Chip-scale dispersion compensation of high-speed data– recent progress and future perspectives.Laser & Pho- tonics Reviews, 19(6):2400755, 2025

    George FR Chen, Kenny YK Ong, and Dawn TH Tan. Chip-scale dispersion compensation of high-speed data– recent progress and future perspectives.Laser & Pho- tonics Reviews, 19(6):2400755, 2025

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    A 4×256 gbps silicon transmitter with on-chip adaptive dispersion compensation.Nature Com- munications, 16(1):6268, 2025

    Shihuan Ran, Yu Guo, Yuanbin Liu, Ting Miao, Yangbo Wu, Yang Qin, Yuyao Guo, Liangjun Lu, Yixiao Zhu, Yu Li, et al. A 4×256 gbps silicon transmitter with on-chip adaptive dispersion compensation.Nature Com- munications, 16(1):6268, 2025

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Bauters, Martijn J

    Jared F. Bauters, Martijn J. R. Heck, Demis John, Daoxin Dai, Ming-Chun Tien, Jonathon S. Barton, Arne Leinse, Ren´ e G. Heideman, Daniel J. Blumenthal, and John E. Bowers. Ultra-low-loss high-aspect-ratio Si 3N4 10 waveguides.Opt. Express, 19(4):3163–3174, Feb 2011

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    Leal, Lue Wu, Maodong Gao, Avi Feshali, Mario Paniccia, Kerry J

    Warren Jin, Qi-Fan Yang, Lin Chang, Boqiang Shen, Heming Wang, Mark A. Leal, Lue Wu, Maodong Gao, Avi Feshali, Mario Paniccia, Kerry J. Vahala, and John E. Bowers. Hertz-linewidth semiconductor lasers using cmos-ready ultra-high-q microresonators.Nature Photonics, 15(5):346–353, May 2021

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Puckett, Karl D

    Kaikai Liu, Naijun Jin, Haotian Cheng, Nitesh Chauhan, Matthew W. Puckett, Karl D. Nelson, Ryan O. Behunin, Peter T. Rakich, and Daniel J. Blumenthal. Ultralow 0.034 dB/m loss wafer-scale integrated photonics realiz- ing 720 million Q and 380µW threshold Brillouin lasing. Opt. Lett., 47(7):1855–1858, Apr 2022

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Reach- ing fiber-laser coherence in integrated photonics.Optics Letters, 46(20):5201–5204, 2021

    Bohan Li, Warren Jin, Lue Wu, Lin Chang, Heming Wang, Boqiang Shen, Zhiquan Yuan, Avi Feshali, Mario Paniccia, Kerry J Vahala, and John E Bowers. Reach- ing fiber-laser coherence in integrated photonics.Optics Letters, 46(20):5201–5204, 2021

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Chip- scale high-performance photonic microwave oscillator

    Yang He, Long Cheng, Heming Wang, Yu Zhang, Roy Meade, Kerry Vahala, Mian Zhang, and Jiang Li. Chip- scale high-performance photonic microwave oscillator. Science Advances, 10(33):eado9570, 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Photonic microwave generation in the X-and K- band using integrated soliton microcombs.Nature Pho- tonics, 14(8):486–491, 2020

    Junqiu Liu, Erwan Lucas, Arslan S Raja, Jijun He, Jo- hann Riemensberger, Rui Ning Wang, Maxim Karpov, Hairun Guo, Romain Bouchand, and Tobias J Kippen- berg. Photonic microwave generation in the X-and K- band using integrated soliton microcombs.Nature Pho- tonics, 14(8):486–491, 2020

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Xingchen Ji, Felippe A. S. Barbosa, Samantha P. Roberts, Avik Dutt, Jaime Cardenas, Yoshitomo Okawachi, Alex Bryant, Alexander L. Gaeta, and Michal Lipson. Ultra-low-loss on-chip resonators with sub- milliwatt parametric oscillation threshold.Optica, 2017

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Dissipative kerr solitons in optical microresonators.Science, 361(6402), 2018

    Tobias J Kippenberg, Alexander L Gaeta, Michal Lipson, and Michael L Gorodetsky. Dissipative kerr solitons in optical microresonators.Science, 361(6402), 2018

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Moss, Roberto Morandotti, Alexander L

    David J. Moss, Roberto Morandotti, Alexander L. Gaeta, and Michal Lipson. New cmos-compatible platforms based on silicon nitride and hydex for nonlinear optics. Nature Photonics, 7:597, 07 2013

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Ultrafast optical pulse shaping: A tutorial review.Optics Communications, 284(15):3669– 3692, 2011

    Andrew M Weiner. Ultrafast optical pulse shaping: A tutorial review.Optics Communications, 284(15):3669– 3692, 2011

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    Zhitian Chen, Jonas Flueckiger, Xu Wang, Fan Zhang, Han Yun, Zeqin Lu, Michael Caverley, Yun Wang, Nico- las A. F. Jaeger, and Lukas Chrostowski. Spiral Bragg grating waveguides for TM mode silicon photonics.Op- tics Express, 23(19):25295, 2015

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    On-Chip Circulator- Free Chirped Spiral Multimode Waveguide Grating for Dispersion Management.ACS Photonics, 10(5):1654– 1661, 2023

    Shujun Liu, Changping Zhang, Hongyuan Cao, Shihan Hong, Zejie Yu, and Daoxin Dai. On-Chip Circulator- Free Chirped Spiral Multimode Waveguide Grating for Dispersion Management.ACS Photonics, 10(5):1654– 1661, 2023

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Minglei Ma, Zhitian Chen, Han Yun, Yun Wang, Xu Wang, Nicolas A. F. Jaeger, and Lukas Chros- towski. Apodized Spiral Bragg Grating Waveguides in Silicon-on-Insulator.IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 30(1):111–114, 2018

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    On-chip digitally tunable positive/negative dispersion controller using bidirectional chirped multi- mode waveguide gratings.Advanced Photonics, 5(06), 2023

    Shujun Liu, Ruitao Ma, Zejie Yu, Yaocheng Shi, and Daoxin Dai. On-chip digitally tunable positive/negative dispersion controller using bidirectional chirped multi- mode waveguide gratings.Advanced Photonics, 5(06), 2023

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Large Group Delay in Silicon-on-Insulator Chirped Spi- ral Bragg Grating Waveguide.IEEE Photonics Journal, 13(5):1–5, 2021

    Yu Sun, Dongyu Wang, Chunyu Deng, Mengjia Lu, Lei Huang, Guohua Hu, Binfeng Yun, Ruohu Zhang, Ming Li, Jianji Dong, Anle Wang, and Yiping Cui. Large Group Delay in Silicon-on-Insulator Chirped Spi- ral Bragg Grating Waveguide.IEEE Photonics Journal, 13(5):1–5, 2021

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Kroushkov, J¨ urgen Bruns, Lars Zimmermann, Bernd Tillack, and Klaus Petermann

    Ivano Giuntoni, David Stolarek, Dimitar I. Kroushkov, J¨ urgen Bruns, Lars Zimmermann, Bernd Tillack, and Klaus Petermann. Continuously tunable delay line based on SOI tapered Bragg gratings.Optics Express, 20(10):11241, 2012

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    Large group delay and low loss optical delay line based on chirped waveguide Bragg gratings.Optics Express, 31(3):4630, 2023

    Yaoshuai Li, Liang Xu, Danlu Wang, Qingzhong Huang, Chi Zhang, and Xinliang Zhang. Large group delay and low loss optical delay line based on chirped waveguide Bragg gratings.Optics Express, 31(3):4630, 2023

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Bowers, and Hongwei Chen

    Zhenmin Du, Chao Xiang, Tingzhao Fu, Minghua Chen, Sigang Yang, John E. Bowers, and Hongwei Chen. Sili- con nitride chirped spiral Bragg grating with large group delay.APL Photonics, 5(10):101302, 2020

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Seamless multi-reticle photonics.Optics Letters, 46(12):2984–2987, 2021

    Warren Jin, Avi Feshali, Mario Paniccia, and John E Bowers. Seamless multi-reticle photonics.Optics Letters, 46(12):2984–2987, 2021

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Ennser, N

    K. Ennser, N. Zervas, and R.L. Laming. Optimization of apodized linearly chirped fiber gratings for optical communications.IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 34(5):770–778, 1998

    work page 1998

  42. [42]

    Chemical contrast for imaging living systems: molecular vibrations drive cars microscopy.Nature chem- ical biology, 7(3):137–145, 2011

    John Paul Pezacki, Jessie A Blake, Dana C Danielson, David C Kennedy, Rodney K Lyn, and Ragunath Sin- garavelu. Chemical contrast for imaging living systems: molecular vibrations drive cars microscopy.Nature chem- ical biology, 7(3):137–145, 2011

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    Coherent anti-stokes raman scattering microscopy: instrumentation, theory, and applications.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 108(3):827–840, 2004

    Ji-Xin Cheng and X Sunney Xie. Coherent anti-stokes raman scattering microscopy: instrumentation, theory, and applications.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 108(3):827–840, 2004

    work page 2004

  44. [44]

    CRC press, 2016

    Ji-Xin Cheng and Xiaoliang Sunney Xie.Coherent Ra- man scattering microscopy. CRC press, 2016

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Coherent anti-stokes raman spectroscopy of single and multi-layer graphene.Nature Communications, 10(1):3658, 2019

    A Virga, C Ferrante, G Batignani, D De Fazio, ADG Nunn, AC Ferrari, G Cerullo, and T Scopigno. Coherent anti-stokes raman spectroscopy of single and multi-layer graphene.Nature Communications, 10(1):3658, 2019

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Wide-field coherent anti-stokes ra- man scattering microscopy using random illuminations

    Eric M Fantuzzi, Sandro Heuke, Simon Labouesse, Dominykas Gudaviˇ cius, Randy Bartels, Anne Sentenac, and Herv´ e Rigneault. Wide-field coherent anti-stokes ra- man scattering microscopy using random illuminations. Nature Photonics, 17(12):1097–1104, 2023

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Mode-locking of lasers.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 6(6):1173–1185, 2002

    Herman A Haus. Mode-locking of lasers.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 6(6):1173–1185, 2002

    work page 2002

  48. [48]

    Optical parametric oscillator frequency tuning and control.Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 8(3):646–667, 1991

    Robert C Eckardt, CD Nabors, William J Kozlovsky, and Robert L Byer. Optical parametric oscillator frequency tuning and control.Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 8(3):646–667, 1991

    work page 1991

  49. [49]

    Multimodal spectral fo- cusing cars and sfg microscopy with a tailored coherent continuum from a microstructured fiber.Applied Physics B, 126(5):84, 2020

    Krzysztof P Herdzik, Konstantinos N Bourdakos, Peter B Johnson, Adam P Lister, Aleksandra P Pitera, Chun-yu Guo, Peter Horak, David J Richardson, Jonathan HV Price, and Sumeet Mahajan. Multimodal spectral fo- cusing cars and sfg microscopy with a tailored coherent continuum from a microstructured fiber.Applied Physics B, 126(5):84, 2020

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Stimulated raman scattering microscopy with a ro- bust fibre laser source.Nature photonics, 8(2):153–159, 2014

    Christian W Freudiger, Wenlong Yang, Gary R Holtom, Nasser Peyghambarian, X Sunney Xie, and Khanh Q Kieu. Stimulated raman scattering microscopy with a ro- bust fibre laser source.Nature photonics, 8(2):153–159, 2014. 11

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    Repetition frequency modulated fiber laser for coherent anti-stokes raman scattering.Optics Letters, 45(2):407–410, 2020

    Tao Wu, Kun Chen, Haoyun Wei, and Yan Li. Repetition frequency modulated fiber laser for coherent anti-stokes raman scattering.Optics Letters, 45(2):407–410, 2020

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    Fast vibrational imaging of single cells and tissues by stimulated raman scattering microscopy

    Delong Zhang, Ping Wang, Mikhail N Slipchenko, and Ji-Xin Cheng. Fast vibrational imaging of single cells and tissues by stimulated raman scattering microscopy. Accounts of chemical research, 47(8):2282–2290, 2014

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Multi- variate curve resolution applied to hyperspectral imag- ing analysis of chocolate samples.Applied spectroscopy, 69(8):993–1003, 2015

    Xin Zhang, Anna de Juan, and Rom` a Tauler. Multi- variate curve resolution applied to hyperspectral imag- ing analysis of chocolate samples.Applied spectroscopy, 69(8):993–1003, 2015

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    3d integration enables ultralow-noise isolator-free lasers in silicon pho- tonics.Nature, 620(7972):78–85, 2023

    Chao Xiang, Warren Jin, Osama Terra, Bozhang Dong, Heming Wang, Lue Wu, Joel Guo, Theodore J Morin, Eamonn Hughes, Jonathan Peters, et al. 3d integration enables ultralow-noise isolator-free lasers in silicon pho- tonics.Nature, 620(7972):78–85, 2023

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Grant, Leif Johansson, Yoshitomo Okawachi, Alexander L

    Mengjie Yu, David Barton Iii, Rebecca Cheng, Chris- tian Reimer, Prashanta Kharel, Lingyan He, Linbo Shao, Di Zhu, Yaowen Hu, Hannah R. Grant, Leif Johansson, Yoshitomo Okawachi, Alexander L. Gaeta, Mian Zhang, and Marko Lonˇ car. Integrated femtosecond pulse genera- tor on thin-film lithium niobate.Nature, 612(7939):252– 258, 2022

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    Femtosecond pulse amplification on a chip

    Mahmoud A Gaafar, Markus Ludwig, Kai Wang, Thibault Wildi, Thibault Voumard, Milan Sinobad, Jan Lorenzen, Henry Francis, Jose Carreira, Shuangyou Zhang, et al. Femtosecond pulse amplification on a chip. Nature communications, 15(1):8109, 2024

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Kippenberg, and John E

    Chao Xiang, Junqiu Liu, Joel Guo, Lin Chang, Rui Ning Wang, Wenle Weng, Jonathan Peters, Weiqiang Xie, Zeyu Zhang, Johann Riemensberger, Jennifer Selvidge, Tobias J. Kippenberg, and John E. Bowers. Laser soliton microcombs heterogeneously integrated on silicon.Sci- ence, 373(6550):99–103, 2021. Methods Device fabricationA 100-nm-thick stoichiometric sili-...

    work page 2021