Manifold Data Imputation

David Levin

arxiv: 2604.12871 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

Manifold Data Imputation

David Levin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA

keywords manifold data imputationmissing data reconstructiontangent space approximationFourier decayvariational methodmoving least squaresdiscrete inverse estimatenumerical analysis

0 comments

The pith

Missing data on smooth manifolds with large holes can be stably recovered by reconstructing functions on local tangent spaces without a global parameterization.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a framework for imputing missing values in data sampled from a smooth manifold by breaking the task into local function reconstructions on tangent spaces. Classical global methods break down when samples are sparse or contain big gaps, but this approach combines a spectral method that enforces decay in discrete Fourier coefficients with a variational method that minimizes high-order central differences to produce sparse, well-conditioned least-squares problems. A discrete inverse estimate connects the Fourier decay rate to uniform bounds on divided differences, supplying the theoretical link between the two strategies. These reconstructions are then lifted back to the manifold via a moving least-squares projection, yielding an algorithm whose stability depends mainly on the geometry of the holes rather than on any global coordinate system. Numerical tests on surfaces with substantial missing regions confirm accurate recovery under these conditions.

Core claim

The problem of manifold data imputation reduces to function reconstruction on locally defined tangent spaces. This is accomplished by a Fourier-based method that prescribes decay of discrete Fourier coefficients to enforce high-order smoothness and by a local variational method that minimizes high-order central differences, both integrated through moving least-squares projection. A discrete inverse estimate is proved that links Fourier-coefficient decay to uniform bounds on high-order divided differences, while existence, uniqueness, and conditioning analysis for the variational systems shows that stability scales with the geometry of the missing region.

What carries the argument

The reduction of global manifold imputation to local tangent-space function reconstruction, carried by the discrete inverse estimate that bounds divided differences via Fourier decay together with the sparse least-squares systems arising from minimization of high-order central differences.

If this is right

Recovery remains accurate and stable even when the data contain significant holes or nonuniform sampling.
No global parameterization of the manifold is required at any stage.
The conditioning of the linear systems depends primarily on the local geometry of each missing region.
The spectral and variational components are linked by an explicit discrete inverse estimate that justifies the choice of decay rate.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same local-tangent reduction could be applied to time-evolving manifold data by treating time as an additional coordinate in the tangent-space reconstruction.
Because the variational systems are sparse, the method may scale to very large point clouds once an efficient nearest-neighbor graph is available.
The framework supplies a concrete way to quantify how the size and shape of holes affect reconstruction error without reference to any global chart.

Load-bearing premise

The underlying data must lie on a smooth manifold and the missing regions must be such that local tangent-space approximations remain valid throughout the imputation process.

What would settle it

Run the algorithm on a known complete manifold sample with artificially created large holes and measure whether the root-mean-square error in the imputed regions exceeds the error obtained by a standard global parameterization method on the same data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12871 by David Levin.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Log(Bounds) where N = {0, . . . , N − 1} d . Define the discrete Fourier coefficients ck = X n∈N fn e − 2πi N k·n , k ∈ N . Assume that the mixed derivative D(M,...,M) f = ∂ M 1 · · · ∂ M d f exists and is bounded on R d . Then, for all k ∈ N such that kj ̸= 0 for j = 1, . . . , d, |ck| ≤ N d (2π/N) Md∥D(M,...,M) f∥∞ Y d j=1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Hyperbolic weights are reflected in the decay of its discrete Fourier coefficients. A rapid decay of the highfrequency coefficients indicates the smoothness of the hole imputation. 3.1. Fourier-based imputation with hyperbolic corner weighting. As reported in [9], applying the periodic extension algorithm with weights chosen as in (2.8) and (2.9) leads to a highly ill-conditioned system of equations. This… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Preparing the tangent plane near the hole in the data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Projecting and filling the hole on the boundary of the torus We are given ∼ 2800 scattered data points sampled from the surface of a variableradius torus, with a localized region of missing data. In the MMLS projection step, the local coordinate system and the local polynomial approximation are defined using a Gaussian weight function, with bivariate polynomials of total degree 5. This results in the blue… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Cross-sectional data containing a missing region and the associated reference hyperplane We consider the three-dimensional manifold in R 4 defined by x 2 1 + x 2 2 + x 2 3 − x 2 4 = 0. We assume that the data are given at grid points on cross-sections of the manifold at fixed values of x4. Portions of four such cross-sections are displayed on the left side of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We consider the problem of reconstructing missing data on a smooth manifold from incomplete and nonuniform samples. While classical methods for manifold approximation typically assume quasi-uniform data, their performance deteriorates significantly in the presence of large gaps or holes. We propose a unified framework for manifold data imputation that reduces the problem to function reconstruction on locally defined tangent spaces. The approach combines two complementary strategies. The first is a Fourier-based method that determines missing values by prescribing a decay rate of the discrete Fourier coefficients, thereby enforcing high-order smoothness through a global spectral criterion. The second is a local variational method based on minimizing high-order central differences, leading to sparse least-squares systems with favorable stability and conditioning properties. We establish a discrete inverse estimate linking decay of Fourier coefficients to uniform bounds on high-order divided differences, providing a theoretical foundation for the spectral approach. For the variational method, we analyze existence, uniqueness, and scaling behavior, showing that conditioning depends primarily on the geometry of the missing region. These functional reconstruction techniques are integrated with a moving least-squares projection framework to yield a practical algorithm for manifold completion. Numerical experiments, including reconstruction on surfaces with significant missing regions, demonstrate accurate and stable recovery without requiring a global parameterization. The proposed framework provides a flexible and effective approach to manifold data imputation in challenging settings with incomplete data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a workable combined spectral and variational method for imputing large holes in manifold data via tangent-space moving least squares, but the stability for big gaps rests on unquantified local-geometry assumptions.

read the letter

The main point is a unified imputation scheme that reduces manifold hole-filling to local tangent-space reconstruction. It pairs a global Fourier-decay condition with a local variational minimization of high-order central differences, connects them through a discrete inverse estimate that bounds divided differences by the decay rate, and then feeds both into moving least squares. The conditioning analysis for the variational part, which depends mainly on the geometry of the missing region, is a clean piece of work. The numerical examples on surfaces with sizable missing patches show stable recovery without needing a global chart, which is the practical payoff. That combination of routes plus the linking estimate is the actual novelty; it is not just a routine extension of earlier manifold approximation papers. The soft spot is the missing quantitative control on hole size. The framework assumes local tangent projections remain accurate, yet there are no explicit conditions relating hole diameter to curvature radius or local sampling density. If a gap approaches the scale where the manifold bends appreciably, the projection error can grow even when the local least-squares matrices stay well-conditioned. The decay rate and difference order are also user-chosen parameters, so the method requires tuning that is not fully automated by the theory. The existence and uniqueness claims for the variational step are stated but not derived in the abstract, which leaves their robustness hard to judge from the given material. This is for numerical analysts and engineers who routinely deal with incomplete manifold samples in graphics, scientific computing, or sensor data. A reader who needs a concrete algorithm that tolerates nonuniform sampling and avoids global parameterization will get usable ideas and some supporting analysis. The work has enough formal grounding and experimental evidence to deserve a serious referee, even though the large-hole guarantees would benefit from tighter scale-separation bounds.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a unified framework for imputing missing data on smooth manifolds from incomplete and nonuniform samples. It reduces the problem to local tangent-space function reconstruction by combining a Fourier-based spectral method (prescribing decay rates on discrete Fourier coefficients to enforce smoothness) with a variational method (minimizing high-order central differences to obtain sparse, well-conditioned least-squares systems). These are integrated via a moving least-squares projection. Theoretical contributions include a discrete inverse estimate linking Fourier coefficient decay to uniform bounds on divided differences, plus analysis of existence, uniqueness, and conditioning for the variational approach (with conditioning depending primarily on missing-region geometry). Numerical experiments on surfaces with significant missing regions are claimed to demonstrate accurate and stable recovery without requiring a global parameterization.

Significance. If the theoretical results and numerical claims hold, the work would be significant for manifold approximation and data completion tasks involving large gaps or holes, where classical quasi-uniform sampling assumptions fail. The discrete inverse estimate provides a concrete link between spectral and finite-difference notions of smoothness, and the conditioning analysis tied to missing-region geometry is a useful practical insight. The avoidance of global parameterization is a clear practical advantage. These elements, together with the reproducible algorithmic structure, would strengthen the paper's contribution if supported by full derivations and quantitative error tables.

major comments (2)

[moving least-squares projection framework and local tangent-space reconstruction] In the integration of the reconstruction techniques with the moving least-squares projection framework (as described following the theoretical analysis): the central claim of accurate and stable recovery for manifolds with significant holes rests on local tangent-space approximations remaining valid, yet no quantitative bounds or scale-separation conditions are supplied on hole diameter relative to local radius of curvature or sampling density to control projection error. This assumption is load-bearing for the stability of the combined scheme and is not addressed by the existing inverse-estimate or conditioning results.
[Abstract] Abstract, paragraph on numerical experiments: the claim of 'accurate and stable recovery' is presented without reference to specific error tables, quantitative metrics (e.g., L2 or pointwise errors versus hole size), or comparison baselines. Without these, it is impossible to verify whether the observed performance depends on post-hoc choices of the Fourier decay rate or difference order, undermining assessment of the framework's robustness.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract introduces the decay rate and difference order as user-prescribed inputs but does not clarify how they are selected in the numerical examples or whether the inverse estimate constrains admissible ranges.
[theoretical analysis] Notation for the discrete Fourier coefficients and the central-difference operators should be introduced with explicit definitions before the inverse-estimate statement to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive major comments. We address each point below with clarifications drawn from the manuscript and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation and theoretical discussion.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [moving least-squares projection framework and local tangent-space reconstruction] In the integration of the reconstruction techniques with the moving least-squares projection framework (as described following the theoretical analysis): the central claim of accurate and stable recovery for manifolds with significant holes rests on local tangent-space approximations remaining valid, yet no quantitative bounds or scale-separation conditions are supplied on hole diameter relative to local radius of curvature or sampling density to control projection error. This assumption is load-bearing for the stability of the combined scheme and is not addressed by the existing inverse-estimate or conditioning results.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not supply explicit quantitative bounds relating hole diameter to local curvature radius or sampling density. The local tangent-space reconstruction is justified by the C^infty smoothness of the underlying manifold together with the adaptive, local nature of the moving least-squares projection, which fits polynomials in charts whose radius is chosen proportionally to the local sampling density. The discrete inverse estimate and conditioning analysis already control the reconstruction error once the projection is accurate; the numerical experiments on surfaces with large holes confirm that the combined scheme remains stable under the sampling regimes tested. To address the referee's concern directly, we will add a dedicated remark (or short subsection) in the revised manuscript that states the scale-separation hypothesis (hole diameter smaller than a fixed fraction of the local radius of curvature, with sampling density satisfying the quasi-uniformity condition inside each chart) and cites standard manifold approximation results to bound the projection error. This addition will make the load-bearing assumption explicit without requiring new theorems. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph on numerical experiments: the claim of 'accurate and stable recovery' is presented without reference to specific error tables, quantitative metrics (e.g., L2 or pointwise errors versus hole size), or comparison baselines. Without these, it is impossible to verify whether the observed performance depends on post-hoc choices of the Fourier decay rate or difference order, undermining assessment of the framework's robustness.

Authors: The abstract is written as a concise overview, but we accept that its qualitative claim would be more informative if tied to the quantitative results already present in the manuscript. Section 5 contains tables reporting L2 and pointwise errors for increasing hole sizes, together with comparisons against global spectral and local polynomial baselines; the experiments also vary the Fourier decay rate and difference order over a range and show that the error remains below 10^{-3} (relative) for the tested configurations. We will revise the abstract to include a brief clause referencing these metrics and the observed robustness, e.g., “Numerical experiments on surfaces with large holes yield relative L2 errors on the order of 10^{-3} that remain stable across moderate variations in Fourier decay and difference order.” This change will allow readers to assess the claims without altering the abstract's length or tone. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivations are independent mathematical estimates

full rationale

The paper's core claims rest on establishing a discrete inverse estimate (Fourier decay to divided-difference bounds) and analyzing variational conditioning as functions of missing-region geometry. These are presented as first-principles results derived from the problem setup rather than fitted parameters or self-referential definitions. Decay rates and difference orders are explicitly user-prescribed inputs, not outputs of the derivation. No self-citations appear as load-bearing steps, and the moving-least-squares integration is a standard projection technique applied after the local reconstructions. The framework therefore remains self-contained against external mathematical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the existence of a smooth manifold, the validity of local tangent-space approximations, and the ability to prescribe a decay rate that enforces the desired smoothness class. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

Fourier coefficient decay rate
Prescribed by the user to enforce high-order smoothness; directly controls the spectral fill-in.
Order of central differences
Chosen to define the variational energy; affects sparsity and conditioning of the least-squares system.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The underlying manifold is smooth and the sampled points lie exactly on it.
Invoked throughout the reduction to tangent spaces and the moving-least-squares projection.
domain assumption Local tangent spaces remain a faithful approximation inside the missing regions.
Required for the function-reconstruction step to be well-posed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5515 in / 1490 out tokens · 31699 ms · 2026-05-10T14:36:05.156598+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

16 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

[1]

Belkin and P

M. Belkin and P. Niyogi, Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation, Neural Computation, 15 (2003), pp. 1373–1396

work page 2003
[2]

M. D. Buhmann,Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003

work page 2003
[3]

R. R. Coifman and S. Lafon, Diffusion maps,Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 21 (2006), pp. 5–30

work page 2006
[4]

Faigenbaum-Golovin and D

S. Faigenbaum-Golovin and D. Levin, Mind the gap: hole-filling and reconstruction of high- dimensional manifolds from noisy scattered data,Sampling Theory, Signal Processing, and Data Analysis, 23 (2025), 1

work page 2025
[5]

Faigenbaum-Golovin and D

S. Faigenbaum-Golovin and D. Levin, Manifold reconstruction and denoising from scattered data in high dimension via a generalization of the L1 median, arXiv:2012.12546, 2020

work page arXiv 2012
[6]

E. J. Fuselier and G. B. Wright, Scattered data interpolation on embedded submanifolds with restricted positive definite kernels: Sobolev error estimates,SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 50 (2012), pp. 1753–1776

work page 2012
[7]

I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik,Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, Academic Press, 2014. MANIFOLD DATA IMPUTATION 23

work page 2014
[8]

Grohs, M

P. Grohs, M. Sprecher, and T. Yu, Scattered manifold-valued data approximation,Numer. Math., 135 (2017), pp. 987–1010

work page 2017
[9]

Gruberger and D

N. Gruberger and D. Levin, Two algorithms for periodic extension on uniform grids,Numerical Algorithms, 86 (2021), pp. 475–494

work page 2021
[10]

L.Hoeltgenetal., OptimisingspatialandtonaldataforPDE-basedinpainting,Variational Methods, 18 (2017), pp. 35–83

work page 2017
[11]

Levin, Mesh-independent surface interpolation, inGeometric Modeling for Scientific Visualiza- tion, Springer, 2003, pp

D. Levin, Mesh-independent surface interpolation, inGeometric Modeling for Scientific Visualiza- tion, Springer, 2003, pp. 37–49

work page 2003
[12]

Lipman and D

Y. Lipman and D. Levin, C1 surface reconstruction using moving least squares,Comput. Graph. Forum, 29 (2010), pp. 1193–1202

work page 2010
[13]

Sober and D

B. Sober and D. Levin, Manifold approximation by moving least-squares projection (MMLS),Con- str. Approx., 44 (2016), pp. 197–220

work page 2016
[14]

Sober, Y

B. Sober, Y. Aizenbud, and D. Levin, Approximation of functions over manifolds: a moving least- squares approach,J. Approx. Theory, 220 (2017), pp. 1–24

work page 2017
[15]

L. N. Trefethen,Spectral Methods in MATLAB, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2000

work page 2000
[16]

Wendland,Scattered Data Approximation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004

H. Wendland,Scattered Data Approximation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004

work page 2004

[1] [1]

Belkin and P

M. Belkin and P. Niyogi, Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation, Neural Computation, 15 (2003), pp. 1373–1396

work page 2003

[2] [2]

M. D. Buhmann,Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003

work page 2003

[3] [3]

R. R. Coifman and S. Lafon, Diffusion maps,Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 21 (2006), pp. 5–30

work page 2006

[4] [4]

Faigenbaum-Golovin and D

S. Faigenbaum-Golovin and D. Levin, Mind the gap: hole-filling and reconstruction of high- dimensional manifolds from noisy scattered data,Sampling Theory, Signal Processing, and Data Analysis, 23 (2025), 1

work page 2025

[5] [5]

Faigenbaum-Golovin and D

S. Faigenbaum-Golovin and D. Levin, Manifold reconstruction and denoising from scattered data in high dimension via a generalization of the L1 median, arXiv:2012.12546, 2020

work page arXiv 2012

[6] [6]

E. J. Fuselier and G. B. Wright, Scattered data interpolation on embedded submanifolds with restricted positive definite kernels: Sobolev error estimates,SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 50 (2012), pp. 1753–1776

work page 2012

[7] [7]

I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik,Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, Academic Press, 2014. MANIFOLD DATA IMPUTATION 23

work page 2014

[8] [8]

Grohs, M

P. Grohs, M. Sprecher, and T. Yu, Scattered manifold-valued data approximation,Numer. Math., 135 (2017), pp. 987–1010

work page 2017

[9] [9]

Gruberger and D

N. Gruberger and D. Levin, Two algorithms for periodic extension on uniform grids,Numerical Algorithms, 86 (2021), pp. 475–494

work page 2021

[10] [10]

L.Hoeltgenetal., OptimisingspatialandtonaldataforPDE-basedinpainting,Variational Methods, 18 (2017), pp. 35–83

work page 2017

[11] [11]

Levin, Mesh-independent surface interpolation, inGeometric Modeling for Scientific Visualiza- tion, Springer, 2003, pp

D. Levin, Mesh-independent surface interpolation, inGeometric Modeling for Scientific Visualiza- tion, Springer, 2003, pp. 37–49

work page 2003

[12] [12]

Lipman and D

Y. Lipman and D. Levin, C1 surface reconstruction using moving least squares,Comput. Graph. Forum, 29 (2010), pp. 1193–1202

work page 2010

[13] [13]

Sober and D

B. Sober and D. Levin, Manifold approximation by moving least-squares projection (MMLS),Con- str. Approx., 44 (2016), pp. 197–220

work page 2016

[14] [14]

Sober, Y

B. Sober, Y. Aizenbud, and D. Levin, Approximation of functions over manifolds: a moving least- squares approach,J. Approx. Theory, 220 (2017), pp. 1–24

work page 2017

[15] [15]

L. N. Trefethen,Spectral Methods in MATLAB, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2000

work page 2000

[16] [16]

Wendland,Scattered Data Approximation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004

H. Wendland,Scattered Data Approximation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004

work page 2004