pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12878 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 📡 eess.AS

Recognition: unknown

Four Decades of Digital Waveguides

Pablo Tablas de Paula , Julius O. Smith III , Vesa V\"alim\"aki , Joshua D. Reiss
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 13:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.AS
keywords digital waveguidesphysical modelingacoustic simulationsound synthesismusical instrumentsoptimizationmachine learningdigital signal processing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Digital waveguides enable efficient real-time simulation of acoustic waves for music and effects.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review traces the development of digital waveguide modeling over forty years as a method for simulating sound wave propagation in musical instruments and acoustic spaces. It shows that by using simple delay lines instead of complex grid calculations, these models achieve physical accuracy at a fraction of the computational cost of traditional finite-difference approaches. The paper explains how this efficiency supports live synthesis of instruments, voices, and reverberation. It also covers how recent optimization techniques, including machine learning, can refine the model parameters for better performance.

Core claim

Digital waveguide physical modeling offers efficient simulation of acoustic wave propagation as compared to general finite-difference schemes commonly used in computational physics. This efficiency has enabled the real-time implementation of physically modeled musical instruments and sound effects, as well as real-time vocal models and artificial reverberation. The paper provides an overview of the historical evolution and applications of digital waveguide modeling and highlights recent advances in the field, including parametric optimization using classical, evolutionary and neural approaches.

What carries the argument

The digital waveguide, a network of bidirectional delay lines with scattering junctions and reflection filters that models one-dimensional wave travel and boundary interactions at low computational cost.

If this is right

  • Real-time synthesis of complex instruments and reverberation becomes feasible on standard computing hardware.
  • Optimization routines can automatically adjust model parameters to match target sounds or reduce modeling errors.
  • Neural and differentiable techniques allow gradient-based training of waveguide parameters from audio data.
  • The approach scales to vocal modeling and room acoustics without prohibitive processing demands.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These models could support low-latency spatial audio in virtual reality by simulating wave interactions in real time.
  • Hybrid systems might combine waveguide structures with neural networks to synthesize entirely new acoustic instruments from examples.
  • The historical pattern suggests future extensions to full three-dimensional scenes if delay-line networks can be adapted efficiently.

Load-bearing premise

The efficiency gains and successful optimization of these models hold only if they maintain physical accuracy and stability without introducing new audio artifacts after parameter changes.

What would settle it

A direct benchmark on the same hardware showing that a finite-difference simulation runs at equal or lower cost for the same level of acoustic accuracy would falsify the reduced computational cost advantage.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12878 by Joshua D. Reiss, Julius O. Smith III, Pablo Tablas de Paula, Vesa V\"alim\"aki.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The lineage of digital waveguide modeling. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A digital signal-processing diagram of the Karplus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Discrete-time simulation of ideal, lossless wave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Scattering junction. Let v[n,m] denote the physical velocity at tem￾poral sample n = 0,1,2,..., and spatial sample m = 0,1,2,...,M − 1. So our digital string is simulated at M uniformly spaced samples over discrete time. For more physical time and position notation, we can de￾fine vp[nT,mX] = v[n,m] where T is the temporal sampling interval in seconds, and X is the spatial sam￾pling interval in meters. The… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Kelly-Lochbaum piecewise cylindrical tube model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Digital waveguide model of a single-reed woodwind [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Digital waveguide model of a bowed string. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Scattering Delay Network (SDN). Wall nodes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Treeverb (digital waveguide web). Tree-nodes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Digital waveguide physical modeling offers efficient simulation of acoustic wave propagation as compared to general finite-difference schemes commonly used in computational physics. This efficiency has enabled the real-time implementation of physically modeled musical instruments and sound effects, as well as real-time vocal models and artificial reverberation. This paper provides an overview of the historical evolution and applications of digital waveguide modeling and highlights recent advances in the field. Parametric optimization using classical, evolutionary and neural approaches are also discussed and compared. Digital waveguides provide physically accurate simulations with reduced computational cost, and can now be optimized with modern machine learning and differentiable digital signal processing techniques.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents an overview of the historical evolution and applications of digital waveguide modeling for physical modeling of acoustic phenomena over four decades. It contrasts the efficiency of digital waveguides with general finite-difference schemes, noting their use in real-time musical instruments, sound effects, vocal models, and reverberation. The manuscript also discusses and compares parametric optimization methods using classical, evolutionary, and neural approaches, concluding that digital waveguides enable physically accurate simulations at reduced computational cost and can be further improved using machine learning and differentiable digital signal processing.

Significance. This survey could be significant for the audio signal processing community by providing a consolidated view of the field's development and current optimization trends. By highlighting the integration of modern ML techniques, it may encourage further research in differentiable audio processing. However, as it primarily summarizes prior work without new contributions, its novelty is limited to the synthesis and comparison of optimization methods.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'recent advances' and 'parametric optimization' but does not specify the time frame or key references; the main text should ensure these are clearly introduced early on.
  2. Consider adding a table comparing the different optimization approaches (classical, evolutionary, neural) in terms of computational cost, accuracy, and stability to strengthen the comparison claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript and for recommending minor revision. We appreciate the acknowledgment that the survey provides a consolidated view of the field's development and may encourage research in differentiable audio processing. We address the referee's comment on novelty below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: However, as it primarily summarizes prior work without new contributions, its novelty is limited to the synthesis and comparison of optimization methods.

    Authors: We agree that the core of the paper is an overview of four decades of digital waveguide modeling, its efficiency advantages over general finite-difference schemes, and its applications in real-time instruments, sound effects, vocal synthesis, and reverberation. However, the direct comparison of parametric optimization approaches (classical, evolutionary, and neural) within the digital waveguide framework, including their integration with differentiable DSP, constitutes a novel synthesis not previously presented in a single work. This comparative analysis, which evaluates trade-offs in accuracy, computational cost, and optimization efficacy, is the primary contribution beyond historical review. If the referee has specific minor suggestions to improve clarity, add references, or expand any section, we will incorporate them in the revised version. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: survey paper with no derivations

full rationale

This is a historical survey and overview paper summarizing four decades of digital waveguide modeling, applications, and optimization techniques. It contains no new derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or predictions that could reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. All claims restate established results from the cited literature (including prior work by co-author Smith), but the text does not invoke self-citations as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, smuggle ansatzes, or rename known results as novel unifications. The central efficiency and optimization statements are presented as overviews rather than internally derived results, making the paper self-contained against external benchmarks with no circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper based on the abstract, no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5400 in / 884 out tokens · 28223 ms · 2026-05-10T13:46:18.353332+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

213 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    By Newton’s third law, the transverse forces must sum to zero at the junction: [f+ 1 +f − 1 ] + [f+ 2 +f − 2 ] = 0 (4) ⇒ v+ 1 −v− 1 R1 + v+ 2 −v− 2 R2 = 0. (5)

  2. [2]

    If the string does not break, then the string end- point velocities are equal at the junction: vJ = v+ 1 +v− 1 = v+ 2 +v− 2 = v+

  3. [3]

    We can solve for the outgoing waves: v− 1 = v+ 1 R1−R2 R1 +R2 , v + 2 = v+ 1 2R1 R1 +R2

    (6) These physical constraints are counterparts of Kirchhoff’s voltage and current laws in circuit analy- sis. We can solve for the outgoing waves: v− 1 = v+ 1 R1−R2 R1 +R2 , v + 2 = v+ 1 2R1 R1 +R2 . (7) In terms of theforce reflection coefficient r1 = R2−R1 R1 +R2 , (8) we can write the completescattering equationsfor this series junction of Fig. 4: f − 1 =...

  4. [4]

    By contrast, a ‘paral- lel’ junction has a common force, and velocities sum to zero

    (10) It is a ‘series’ junction because there is a common ve- locity, while forces sum to zero. By contrast, a ‘paral- lel’ junction has a common force, and velocities sum to zero. As R2→∞ (rigid termination),v− 1 =−v+ 1 (an in- verting reflection) andv+ 2 = 0 (no transmission). Sim- ilarly, whenR2 = 0 (a ‘free end’ which can be imag- ined as a frictionless...

  5. [5]

    Singing Physical Articulatory Synthesis Model

    (11) 2.3 Acoustic Tubes The vocal tract in speech is often modeled as a piecewise-cylindrical acoustic tube [16], as shown in Submitted to J. Audio Eng. Soc., 2026 April 5 TABLAS DE PAULA ET AL. DRAFT Fig. 5. Kelly-Lochbaum piecewise cylindrical tube model of the vocal tract, where A indicates the cross-sectional area of each corresponding section. Fig. 5...

    2026

  6. [6]

    Prony [46,47,160,161] Iterative Weighted Error [113,162,163] Steiglitz–McBride System Identification Kelly–Lochbaum [164] Nearest Neighbor Reed–Bore [165] Cosine-Similarity Bowed String [166] Gaussian Mixture Model Avian Vocal Tract [138] Maximum Likelihood Genetic Flute [93] Spectral FitnessFiltered Delay Loop [167] 2D Vocal Tract DWM [168] Perceptually-I...

    2026

  7. [7]

    Hence, they de- signed RNNs whose structure mirrors DWG topolo- gies, where neuron weights act as scattering coeffi- cients [180–184]

    for a mathematical derivation). Hence, they de- signed RNNs whose structure mirrors DWG topolo- gies, where neuron weights act as scattering coeffi- cients [180–184]. However, RNN units need to be cas- caded or parallelized to extend beyond first-order, hence complicating the topology of DWGs and im- pacting computational load at synthesis. Differentiable Dig...

    2026

  8. [8]

    Physical Modeling Using Digital Waveguides,

    J. O. Smith, “Physical Modeling Using Digital Waveguides,” Computer Music J., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 74–91 (1992 Dec.), doi:10.2307/3680470

    work page doi:10.2307/3680470 1992

  9. [9]

    SPASM, a Real-Time Vocal Tract Physical Model Controller; and Singer, the Compan- ion Software Synthesis System,

    P. R. Cook, “SPASM, a Real-Time Vocal Tract Physical Model Controller; and Singer, the Compan- ion Software Synthesis System,”Computer Music J., vol. 17, pp. 30–44 (1993 Jun.), doi:10.2307/3680568

    work page doi:10.2307/3680568 1993

  10. [10]

    Discrete-Time Modelling of Musical Instruments,

    V. Välimäki, J. Pakarinen, C. Erkut, and M. Karjalainen, “Discrete-Time Modelling of Musical Instruments,” Rep. Prog. Phys., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 1–78 (2006 Jan.), doi:10.1088/0034-4885/69/1/R01

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/69/1/r01 2006

  11. [11]

    Farnell, Designing Sound (MIT Press, 2010 Sep.), URL https://mitpress.mit.edu/ 9780262014410/designing-sound/

    A. Farnell, Designing Sound (MIT Press, 2010 Sep.), URL https://mitpress.mit.edu/ 9780262014410/designing-sound/

    2010

  12. [12]

    Models of Musical String Vibration,

    S. Bilbao and M. Ducceschi, “Models of Musical String Vibration,”Acoust. Sci. Technol., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 194–209 (2023 May), doi:10.1250/ast.44.194

    work page doi:10.1250/ast.44.194 2023

  13. [13]

    A New Approach to Digital Rever- beration using Closed Waveguide Networks,

    J. O. Smith, “A New Approach to Digital Rever- beration using Closed Waveguide Networks,” inProc. Intl. Computer Music Conf. (Vancouver, Canada) (1985 Aug.)

    1985

  14. [14]

    Colorless Ar- tificial Reverberation,

    M. R. Schroeder and B. F. Logan, “Colorless Ar- tificial Reverberation,” IRE Trans. Audio, vol. AU- 9, no. 6, pp. 209–214 (1961 Nov.–Dec.), doi:10.1109/ TAU.1961.1166351

    work page arXiv 1961

  15. [15]

    Belevitch,Classical Network Theory, Holden- Day series in information systems (Holden Day, San Francisco, 1968), URLhttps://books.google.com/ books?id=q-JSAAAAMAAJ

    V. Belevitch,Classical Network Theory, Holden- Day series in information systems (Holden Day, San Francisco, 1968), URLhttps://books.google.com/ books?id=q-JSAAAAMAAJ

    1968

  16. [16]

    Investigation of the Curve Formed by a Vibrating String, 1747,

    J. l. R. d’Alembert, “Investigation of the Curve Formed by a Vibrating String, 1747,” in R. B. Lind- say (Ed.),Acoustics: Historical and Philosophical De- velopment, pp. 119–123 (Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsburg, 1973)

    1973

  17. [17]

    Communication in the Pres- ence of Noise,

    C. E. Shannon, “Communication in the Pres- ence of Noise,” Proc. IRE, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 10–21 (1949 Jan.), doi:10.1109/JRPROC.1949.232969

    work page doi:10.1109/jrproc.1949.232969 1949

  18. [18]

    Digital Simulation of Sound Transmission in Reverberant Spaces (Part I),

    M. R. Schroeder, “Digital Simulation of Sound Transmission in Reverberant Spaces (Part I),” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 424–431 (1970 Feb.), doi:10.1121/1.1911541

    work page doi:10.1121/1.1911541 1970

  19. [19]

    About this Reverberation Busi- ness,

    J. A. Moorer, “About this Reverberation Busi- ness,” Computer Music J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 13–18 (1979 Jun.), doi:10.2307/3680280

    work page doi:10.2307/3680280 1979

  20. [20]

    J. D. Markel and A. H. Gray,Linear Prediction of Speech(Springer Verlag, New York, 1976)

    1976

  21. [21]

    Speech Syn- thesis,

    J. L. Kelly and C. C. Lochbaum, “Speech Syn- thesis,” Proc. Intl. Congr. on Acoustics, pp. 1–4 (1962 Sep.), paper G42

    1962

  22. [22]

    Daisy Bell (Bicycle Built for Two) - First Computer- Sung Song (1961),

    J. L. Kelly, C. Lochbaum, and M. Mathews, “Daisy Bell (Bicycle Built for Two) - First Computer- Sung Song (1961),” https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=41U78QP8nBk (accessed Nov. 18, 2025), YouTube video

    1961

  23. [23]

    J. O. Smith III, Physical Audio Signal Pro- cessing(https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/pasp/, 2010 Dec.), W3K Publishing, online book

    2010

  24. [24]

    On the Oscillations of Musical In- struments,

    M. E. McIntyre, R. T. Schumacher, and J. Woodhouse, “On the Oscillations of Musical In- struments,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 1325–1345 (1983 Nov.), doi:10.1121/1.390157

    work page doi:10.1121/1.390157 1983

  25. [25]

    Efficient Simulation of the Reed- Bore and Bow-String Mechanisms,

    J. O. Smith, “Efficient Simulation of the Reed- Bore and Bow-String Mechanisms,” in Proc. Intl. Computer Music Conf.(The Hague, The Netherlands) (1986 Oct.)

    1986

  26. [26]

    Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, Sec- tion 2104: Utility,

    United States Patent and Trademark Of- fice, “Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, Sec- tion 2104: Utility,” https://www.uspto.gov/web/ offices/pac/mpep/s2104.html (accessed Nov. 18, 2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Digital Signal Processing us- ing Waveguide Networks,

    J. O. Smith, “Digital Signal Processing us- ing Waveguide Networks,” US Patent 4,984,276 (1991 Jan.). Submitted to J. Audio Eng. Soc., 2026 April 13 TABLAS DE PAULA ET AL. DRAFT

    1991

  28. [28]

    Yamaha VL1 Virtual Acoustic Synthesizer,

    R. Rideout, “Yamaha VL1 Virtual Acoustic Synthesizer,” Keyboard Magazine, vol. 20, pp. 104–118 (1994 Jun.)

    1994

  29. [29]

    Digital Synthesis of Plucked-String and Drum Timbres,

    K. Karplus and A. Strong, “Digital Synthesis of Plucked-String and Drum Timbres,”Computer Music J., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 43–55 (1983 Jun.), doi:10.2307/ 3680062

    1983

  30. [30]

    Synthesizing Musical Sounds by Solving the Wave Equation for Vibrating Objects. Part I

    L. Hiller and P. Ruiz, “Synthesizing Musical Sounds by Solving the Wave Equation for Vibrating Objects. Part I.”J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 462–470 (1971 Jul.)

    1971

  31. [31]

    Extensions of the Karplus-Strong Plucked-String Algorithm,

    D. A. Jaffe and J. O. Smith, “Extensions of the Karplus-Strong Plucked-String Algorithm,”Computer Music J., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 56–69 (1983 Jun.), doi: 10.2307/3680063

    work page doi:10.2307/3680063 1983

  32. [32]

    J. O. Smith III, Techniques for Digital Filter Design and System Identification, with Application to the Violin, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University (1983)

    1983

  33. [33]

    A Model for Real-Time Sound Synthesis of Guitar on a Floating- Point Signal Processor,

    M. Karjalainen and U. K. Laine, “A Model for Real-Time Sound Synthesis of Guitar on a Floating- Point Signal Processor,” in Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 5, pp. 3653–3656 (Toronto, Canada) (1991 Apr.), doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.1991.151066

    work page doi:10.1109/icassp.1991.151066 1991

  34. [34]

    Splitting the Unit Delay—Tools for Fractional Delay Filter Design,

    T. I. Laakso, V. Välimäki, M. Karjalainen, and U. K. Laine, “Splitting the Unit Delay—Tools for Fractional Delay Filter Design,” IEEE Signal Pro- cess. Mag., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 30–60 (1996 Jan.), doi: 10.1109/79.482137

    work page doi:10.1109/79.482137 1996

  35. [35]

    On the Fundamentals of Bowed-String Dynamics,

    M. E. McIntyre and J. Woodhouse, “On the Fundamentals of Bowed-String Dynamics,” Acta Acust. united Acust., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 93–108 (1979 Sep.)

    1979

  36. [36]

    Rayleigh, Theory of Sound, Volumes I and II (Dover, New York, 1991), 1st ed

    L. Rayleigh, Theory of Sound, Volumes I and II (Dover, New York, 1991), 1st ed. 1894

    1991

  37. [37]

    Belevitch,Theory of Linear Network Analy- sis and Synthesis, Ph.D

    V. Belevitch,Theory of Linear Network Analy- sis and Synthesis, Ph.D. thesis, Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain, Belgium (1945)

    1945

  38. [38]

    Digital Filter Structures Related to Classical Filter Networks,

    A. Fettweis, “Digital Filter Structures Related to Classical Filter Networks,” Archiv für Elektronik und Übertragungstechnik (AEÜ), vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 79–89 (1971 Feb.)

    1971

  39. [39]

    Wave Digital Filters: Theory and Practice,

    A. Fettweis, “Wave Digital Filters: Theory and Practice,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 270–327 (1986 Feb.), doi:10.1109/PROC.1986.13458

    work page doi:10.1109/proc.1986.13458 1986

  40. [40]

    A Method of Analysing the Be- haviour of Linear Systems in Terms of Time Series,

    A. Tustin, “A Method of Analysing the Be- haviour of Linear Systems in Terms of Time Series,”J. Inst. Electr. Eng., Part IIA: Automatic Regulators and Servo Mechanisms, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 130–142 (1947 May), doi:10.1049/ji-2a.1947.0020

    work page doi:10.1049/ji-2a.1947.0020 1947

  41. [41]

    Steiglitz,The General Theory of Digital Fil- ters with Applications to Spectral Analysis, D.Eng.Sc

    K. Steiglitz,The General Theory of Digital Fil- ters with Applications to Spectral Analysis, D.Eng.Sc. dissertation, New York University, New York, NY (1963 May)

    1963

  42. [42]

    The Equivalence of Digital and Analog Signal Processing,

    K. Steiglitz, “The Equivalence of Digital and Analog Signal Processing,”Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 455–467 (1965 Oct.), doi:10.1016/ S0019-9958(65)90374-8

    1965

  43. [43]

    The Wave Digital Hammer: A Computationally Efficient Traveling Wave Model of the Piano Hammer and the Felt Mallet,

    S. A. Van Duyne and J. O. Smith III, “The Wave Digital Hammer: A Computationally Efficient Traveling Wave Model of the Piano Hammer and the Felt Mallet,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 96, pp. 3300– 3301 (1994 Nov.), doi:10.1121/1.410815

    work page doi:10.1121/1.410815 1994

  44. [44]

    The Wave Digital Pi- ano Hammer: A Passive Formulation,

    S. D. Bilbao, J. O. Smith III, J. Bensa, and R. Kronland-Martinet, “The Wave Digital Pi- ano Hammer: A Passive Formulation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 112, pp. 2239–2239 (2002 Nov.), doi: 10.1121/1.4778886

    work page doi:10.1121/1.4778886 2002

  45. [45]

    The Wave Digital Tonehole Model,

    M. van Walstijn, “The Wave Digital Tonehole Model,” in Proc. Intl. Computer Music Conf.(2000 Aug.)

    2000

  46. [46]

    Resolving Wave Digital Filters with Multi- ple/Multiport Nonlinearities,

    K. Werner, V. Nangia, J. Smith, and J. Abel, “Resolving Wave Digital Filters with Multi- ple/Multiport Nonlinearities,” inProc. Intl. Conf. on Digital Audio Effects(2015 Nov.)

    2015

  47. [47]

    A General and Explicit Formulation for Wave Digital Filters with Multiple/Multiport Nonlinearities and Complicated Topologies,

    K. J. Werner, V. Nangia, J. O. Smith, and J. S. Abel, “A General and Explicit Formulation for Wave Digital Filters with Multiple/Multiport Nonlinearities and Complicated Topologies,” in Proc. IEEE Work- shop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA), pp. 1–5 (2015 Oct.), doi: 10.1109/WASPAA.2015.7336908

    work page doi:10.1109/waspaa.2015.7336908 2015

  48. [48]

    An Improved and Gen- eralized Diode Clipper Model for Wave Digital Fil- ters,

    K. J. Werner, V. Nangia, A. Bernardini, J. O. Smith, III, and A. Sarti, “An Improved and Gen- eralized Diode Clipper Model for Wave Digital Fil- ters,” presented at the Audio Engineering Society Convention139 (2015 Oct.), URL http://www.aes. org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=17918

    2015

  49. [49]

    Wave Digi- tal Simulation of a Vacuum-Tube Amplifier,

    M. Karjalainen and J. Pakarinen, “Wave Digi- tal Simulation of a Vacuum-Tube Amplifier,” inProc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Pro- cessing, vol. 5 (2006 May), doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2006. 1661235

    work page doi:10.1109/icassp.2006 2006

  50. [50]

    The Fender Bassman 5F6-A Family of Preamplifier Circuits—A Wave Dig- ital Filter Case Study,

    W. R. Dunkel, M. Rest, K. J. Werner, M. J. Olsen, and J. O. Smith III, “The Fender Bassman 5F6-A Family of Preamplifier Circuits—A Wave Dig- ital Filter Case Study,” inProc. Intl. Conf. on Digital Audio Effects(2016 Sep.)

    2016

  51. [51]

    J. C. Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 1st ed. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1873)

  52. [52]

    Rayleigh, The Theory of Sound , vol

    L. Rayleigh, The Theory of Sound , vol. 1 (Macmillan, London, 1877)

  53. [53]

    Physical Modeling of Plucked String Instruments with Application to Real-Time Sound Synthesis,

    V. Välimäki, J. Huopaniemi, M. Karjalainen, and Z. Jánosy, “Physical Modeling of Plucked String Instruments with Application to Real-Time Sound Synthesis,” J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 44, no. 5, p. 331–353 (1996 May)

    1996

  54. [54]

    Developmentand Calibration of a Guitar Synthesizer,

    V.VälimäkiandT.Tolonen,“Developmentand Calibration of a Guitar Synthesizer,”J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 766–778 (1998 Sep.)

    1998

  55. [55]

    Methods for Modeling Realistic Playing in Acoustic Guitar Synthesis,

    M. Laurson, C. Erkut, V. Välimäki, and M. Ku- uskankare, “Methods for Modeling Realistic Playing in Acoustic Guitar Synthesis,” Computer Music J., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 38–49 (2001 Sep.), doi:10.1162/ 014892601753189529. 14 Submitted to J. Audio Eng. Soc., 2026 April DRAFT FOUR DECADES OF DIGITAL WA VEGUIDES

    2001

  56. [56]

    Plucked-String Models: From the Karplus-Strong Al- gorithm to Digital Waveguides and beyond,

    M. Karjalainen, V. Välimäki, and T. Tolonen, “Plucked-String Models: From the Karplus-Strong Al- gorithm to Digital Waveguides and beyond,” Com- puter Music J., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 17–32 (1998 Sep.), doi:10.2307/3681155

    work page doi:10.2307/3681155 1998

  57. [57]

    Efficient Synthesis of Stringed Musical Instruments,

    J. O. Smith III, “Efficient Synthesis of Stringed Musical Instruments,” inProc. Intl. Computer Music Conf., pp. 64–71 (1993 Sep.)

    1993

  58. [58]

    Com- muted Piano Synthesis,

    J. O. Smith III and S. A. Van Duyne, “Com- muted Piano Synthesis,” inProc. Intl. Computer Mu- sic Conf., pp. 319–326 (1995 Sep.)

    1995

  59. [59]

    Develop- ments for the Commuted Piano,

    S. A. Van Duyne and J. O. Smith III, “Develop- ments for the Commuted Piano,” inProc. Intl. Com- puter Music Conf., pp. 335–343 (1995 Sep.)

    1995

  60. [60]

    Towards high-quality sound synthesis of the guitar and string instruments,

    M. Karjalainen, V. Välimäki, and Z. Jánosy, “Towards high-quality sound synthesis of the guitar and string instruments,” inProc. Intl. Computer Mu- sic Conf., pp. 56–56 (1993 Jan.)

    1993

  61. [61]

    Perfor- mance Expression in Commuted Waveguide Synthe- sis of Bowed Strings,

    D. A. Jaffe and J. O. Smith III, “Perfor- mance Expression in Commuted Waveguide Synthe- sis of Bowed Strings,” inProc. Intl. Computer Music Conf., pp. 343–346 (1995 Sep.)

    1995

  62. [62]

    Nonlinear Commuted Synthe- sis of Bowed Strings,

    J. O. Smith III, “Nonlinear Commuted Synthe- sis of Bowed Strings,” inProc. Intl. Computer Music Conf. (1997 Sep.)

    1997

  63. [63]

    Physical Modeling with the 2-D Digital Waveguide Mesh,

    S. A. Van Duyne, “Physical Modeling with the 2-D Digital Waveguide Mesh,” inProc. Intl. Computer Music Conf. (Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library) (1993 Sep.)

    1993

  64. [64]

    S. D. Bilbao,Wave and Scattering Methods for Numerical Simulation(J.Wiley,Chichester,WestSus- sex, England, 2004)

    2004

  65. [65]

    A new formula- tion of the 2D-waveguide mesh for percussion instru- ments,

    F. Fontana and D. Rocchesso, “A new formula- tion of the 2D-waveguide mesh for percussion instru- ments,” inProc. XI Colloquiun on Musical Informat- ics, pp. 27–30 (Bologna, Italy) (1995 Nov.)

    1995

  66. [66]

    Reduction of the Dispersion Error in the Triangular Digital Waveguide Mesh using Frequency Warping,

    L. Savioja and V. Välimäki, “Reduction of the Dispersion Error in the Triangular Digital Waveguide Mesh using Frequency Warping,” IEEE Signal Pro- cess. Lett., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 58–60 (1999 Mar.), doi: 10.1109/97.744624

    work page doi:10.1109/97.744624 1999

  67. [67]

    Online correc- tion of dispersion error in 2D waveguide meshes,

    F. Fontana and D. Rocchesso, “Online correc- tion of dispersion error in 2D waveguide meshes,” in Proc. Intl. Computer Music Conf., pp. 78–81 (Berlin, Germany) (2000 Sep.)

    2000

  68. [68]

    The Tetrahedral Digital Waveguide Mesh,

    S. Van Duyne and J. Smith, “The Tetrahedral Digital Waveguide Mesh,” in Proc. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA), pp. 234–237 (1995 Oct.), doi: 10.1109/ASPAA.1995.482998

    work page doi:10.1109/aspaa.1995.482998 1995

  69. [69]

    The 3D Tetrahedral Digi- tal Waveguide Mesh with Musical Applications,

    S. Van Duyne, “The 3D Tetrahedral Digi- tal Waveguide Mesh with Musical Applications,” in Proc. Intl. Computer Music Conf.(Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library) (1996)

    1996

  70. [70]

    Waveguide Mesh Method for Low- Frequency Simulation of Room Acoustics,

    L. Savioja, J. Backman, A. Järvinen, and T. Takala, “Waveguide Mesh Method for Low- Frequency Simulation of Room Acoustics,” in Proc. 15th International Congress on Acoustics (Norway) (1995 Jun.)

    1995

  71. [71]

    RoomWeaver: A Digital Waveguide Mesh Based Room Acoustics Re- search Tool,

    M. Beeson and D. Murphy, “RoomWeaver: A Digital Waveguide Mesh Based Room Acoustics Re- search Tool,” inProc. Intl. Conf. on Digital Audio Ef- fects, pp. 268–73 (2004 Oct.)

    2004

  72. [72]

    RoomWeaver and Digitract: Two Digital Waveguide Mesh Acoustic Modeling Research Tools,

    D. T. Murphy, M. J. Beeson, J. Mullen, and D. M. Howard, “RoomWeaver and Digitract: Two Digital Waveguide Mesh Acoustic Modeling Research Tools,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 116, p. 2579 (2004 Oct.), doi:10.1121/1.4785299

    work page doi:10.1121/1.4785299 2004

  73. [73]

    The Digital Waveguide Mesh: Applications in Acoustic Modeling and Current Re- search Directions,

    D. T. Murphy, “The Digital Waveguide Mesh: Applications in Acoustic Modeling and Current Re- search Directions,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 116, p. 2562 (2004 Oct.), doi:10.1121/1.4785231

    work page doi:10.1121/1.4785231 2004

  74. [74]

    Acoustic Modeling Using the Digital Waveguide Mesh,

    D. Murphy, A. Kelloniemi, J. Mullen, and S. Shelley, “Acoustic Modeling Using the Digital Waveguide Mesh,”IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 55–66 (2007 Mar.), doi:10.1109/MSP.2007. 323264

    work page doi:10.1109/msp.2007 2007

  75. [75]

    The Bilinearly Deinterpolated Waveguide Mesh,

    L. Savioja and V. Välimäki, “The Bilinearly Deinterpolated Waveguide Mesh,” in Proc. IEEE Nordic Signal Processing Symposium,pp.443–446(Es- poo, Finland) (1996 Sep.)

    1996

  76. [76]

    A Modified Rectangular Waveguide Mesh Structure with Interpolated Input and Output Points,

    F. Fontana, L. Savioja, and V. Välimäki, “A Modified Rectangular Waveguide Mesh Structure with Interpolated Input and Output Points,” inProc. Intl. Computer Music Conf.(Havana, Cuba) (2001 Sep.)

    2001

  77. [77]

    Mod- eling High-Frequency Modes of Complex Resonators Using a Waveguide Mesh,

    P.Huang,S.Serafin,andJ.O.SmithIII,“Mod- eling High-Frequency Modes of Complex Resonators Using a Waveguide Mesh,” inProc. Intl. Conf. on Dig- ital Audio Effects, pp. 269–272 (2000 Dec.)

    2000

  78. [78]

    A Waveguide Mesh Model of High-Frequency Vio- lin Body Resonances,

    P. Huang, S. Serafin, and J. O. Smith III, “A Waveguide Mesh Model of High-Frequency Vio- lin Body Resonances,” inProc. Intl. Computer Music Conf. (2000 Aug.)

    2000

  79. [79]

    Reducing the Dis- persion Error in the Digital Waveguide Mesh Using Interpolation and Frequency-Warping Techniques,

    L. Savioja and V. Välimäki, “Reducing the Dis- persion Error in the Digital Waveguide Mesh Using Interpolation and Frequency-Warping Techniques,” IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.,pp.184–194(2000 Mar.), doi:10.1109/89.824704

    work page doi:10.1109/89.824704 2000

  80. [80]

    Interpolated 3- D Digital Waveguide Mesh with Frequency Warping,

    L. Savioja and V. Välimäki, “Interpolated 3- D Digital Waveguide Mesh with Frequency Warping,” in Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 5, pp. 3345–3348 (2001 May), doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2001.940375

    work page doi:10.1109/icassp.2001.940375 2001

Showing first 80 references.