pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13225 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.SR

Requiem for a belt: A spatial and kinematical reinterpretation of Gould's Belt in light of Gaia

Michelangelo Pantaleoni Gonz\'alez , Jo\~ao Alves , Cameren Swiggum , Isak Niederbrunner This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR
keywords Gould's BeltGaia DR3OB starsyoung star clustersRadcliffe WaveGalactic kinematicslocal star formationprojection effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gould's Belt is not a coherent expanding ring but a transient alignment of a few young cluster families.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reexamines the long-standing interpretation of Gould's Belt as an inclined, expanding, and rotating ring of stars and gas around the Sun. Using Gaia DR3 positions and velocities for OB stars from the ALS III catalog together with a uniform set of clusters younger than 70 million years, the analysis traces their motions forward and backward in a realistic Galactic potential. It finds that the observed spatial distribution, expansion, rotation, and bulk motion can be produced by the simple superposition of the alpha Per, Cr135, M6, and gamma Vel cluster families, with additional contributions from the Radcliffe Wave's vertical oscillations and from solar reflex motion. The classic ring geometry therefore appears as a projection effect and a product of recent, patchy star formation rather than a single dynamical structure.

Core claim

We reassess the long-standing idea of Gould's Belt using Gaia DR3 for a sample of young massive stars and nearby young clusters. The structure surrounding the Sun, often interpreted as an inclined, expanding, and rotating ring, emerges in our analysis as a transient alignment of a few cluster families rather than an individual, coherent dynamical feature. By combining the ALS III catalog of OB stars with a homogeneous sample of clusters younger than 70 Myr, and by tracing their motions in a realistic Galactic potential, we show that neither the spatial distribution nor the kinematics form a unified system. The inferred expansion, rotation, and bulk motion of the Belt can be reproduced by the

What carries the argument

The superposition of the positions and velocities of the alpha Per, Cr135, M6, and gamma Vel cluster families together with the vertical oscillations of the Radcliffe Wave, which together generate the apparent ring geometry, expansion, and rotation without requiring a single coherent dynamical entity.

If this is right

  • The apparent expansion, rotation, and bulk motion of the Belt are fully reproduced by the overlapping velocities of the four cluster families.
  • The classic inclined geometry is largely produced by the oscillatory pattern of the Radcliffe Wave.
  • Solar reflex motion and earlier assumptions about the local standard of rest amplify the perceived dynamical signals.
  • Gould's Belt should be treated as a 3D asterism shaped by local star-formation history, observational biases, and projection rather than as a unified physical structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar apparent rings or shells in other parts of the disk may also turn out to be line-of-sight alignments once comparable cluster catalogs become available.
  • Models of how star formation propagates through the solar neighborhood will need to incorporate the separate dynamical histories of these cluster families rather than a single expanding ring.
  • High-precision age and velocity data for additional young clusters could test whether any residual kinematic coherence remains once the four families are subtracted.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen sample of young massive stars and clusters younger than 70 million years, plus the specific grouping into the four named cluster families, fully accounts for the observed spatial and kinematic features without significant missing components or selection biases.

What would settle it

A kinematic study that isolates a common expansion or rotation signature among the young stars in the Belt region that cannot be reproduced by adding the measured motions of the alpha Per, Cr135, M6, and gamma Vel families would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13225 by Cameren Swiggum, Isak Niederbrunner, Jo\~ao Alves, Michelangelo Pantaleoni Gonz\'alez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: View from the north Galactic pole of the 800 pc solar neighbourhood with the Galactic Centre towards the right. A set of dashed concentric circles are placed each 200 pc from the Sun, which is itself represented by a yellow star. (Left panel) An overlay of the OB star density field from Pantaleoni González et al. (2025) (blue) and the dust distribution from the extinction map in Vergely et al. (2022) (red)… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Top-down LSR-centered views showing the evolution in the distribution of the young cluster sample associated with Gould’s Belt: (Left panel) 45 Myr ago, (central panel) present day, and (right panel) 30 Myr into the future. The central panel also shows the OB stars depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (Top panel) Peculiar tangential velocities for the OB stars in Gould’s Belt across Galactic longitude, with individual distances shown as a colour gradient. We adopt the peculiar tangential velocity rather than the total peculiar velocity because the latter requires radial velocities, which are largely unavailable for OB stars in Gaia DR3 and, when present, are often unreliable due to the high multiplicity… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Median peculiar velocities calculated as a function of V⊙ when defining a LSR. The filled areas represent the dispersion bounded by the 16th and 84th percentiles. (Top panel) Massive stars in the Belt (dark blue) and outside the Belt (cyan). (Bottom panel) Young clusters in the Belt (crimson) and outside the Belt (pink). The vertical continuous and dotted lines represent the resulting V⊙ values of the χ 2 … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We reassess the long-standing idea of Gould's Belt using Gaia DR3 for a sample of young massive stars and nearby young clusters. The structure surrounding the Sun, often interpreted as an inclined, expanding, and rotating ring, emerges in our analysis as a transient alignment of a few cluster families rather than an individual, coherent dynamical feature. By combining the ALS III catalog of OB stars with a homogeneous sample of clusters younger than 70 Myr, and by tracing their motions in a realistic Galactic potential, we show that neither the spatial distribution nor the kinematics form a unified system. The inferred expansion, rotation, and bulk motion of the Belt can be reproduced by the superposition of the $\alpha$Per, Cr135, M6, and $\gamma$Vel cluster families and are further amplified by solar reflex motion and historical assumptions about the local standard of rest (LSR). The classic inclined geometry is largely explained by the oscillatory pattern of the Radcliffe Wave, which contributes a major arc of the supposed ring. Taken together, these results indicate that Gould's Belt is not a physical structure but a 3D asterism shaped by a complex local star formation history, observational biases, and projection effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper uses Gaia DR3 astrometry for a sample of young massive stars from the ALS III catalog combined with clusters younger than 70 Myr to argue that Gould's Belt is not a coherent inclined, expanding, and rotating dynamical structure. Instead, its apparent spatial and kinematic features arise as a transient superposition of four cluster families (α Per, Cr 135, M6, and γ Vel), further shaped by solar reflex motion, LSR assumptions, and the oscillatory pattern of the Radcliffe Wave.

Significance. If the central reinterpretation holds, the result would substantially revise understanding of local Galactic structure by replacing a long-standing coherent ring model with a picture of fragmented, short-lived alignments driven by recent star-formation history and projection effects. The work draws on modern high-precision data and a realistic Galactic potential, offering a falsifiable alternative that could influence models of disk dynamics and young stellar populations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and cluster-family section] Abstract and methods on family identification: the four families (α Per, Cr 135, M6, γ Vel) are presented as reproducing the Belt's expansion, rotation, and bulk motion, yet the manuscript provides no explicit clustering algorithm, distance/velocity thresholds, or membership probabilities; without these, it is impossible to assess whether the families were defined independently of the Belt features or tuned post hoc to match them.
  2. [Kinematics analysis] Kinematics reproduction section: the claim that superposition of the four families plus solar reflex and LSR choice fully accounts for observed motions requires quantitative residuals (e.g., velocity-field maps or χ² statistics after subtraction); the current description lacks error budgets, completeness corrections for the ALS III + cluster sample, or tests for systematic residuals that might indicate a remaining coherent component.
  3. [Sample selection] Age cutoff and sample definition: the <70 Myr boundary and combination of catalogs are central to excluding older members of a possible longer-lived structure, but no justification or sensitivity test is shown for this cutoff; a direct comparison of kinematics inside versus outside the cutoff (or with relaxed age limits) is needed to confirm that no coherent signal persists.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Methods] Clarify the precise LSR velocity vector adopted and its uncertainty propagation in the potential integration.
  2. [Figures] Add explicit legends, error bars, and coordinate-system definitions to all spatial and velocity figures for reproducibility.
  3. [Discussion] Include a short discussion of possible selection biases in the ALS III catalog at the low-mass or high-extinction end.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which have prompted us to clarify our methodology and strengthen the quantitative support for our conclusions. We address each major point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and cluster-family section] Abstract and methods on family identification: the four families (α Per, Cr 135, M6, γ Vel) are presented as reproducing the Belt's expansion, rotation, and bulk motion, yet the manuscript provides no explicit clustering algorithm, distance/velocity thresholds, or membership probabilities; without these, it is impossible to assess whether the families were defined independently of the Belt features or tuned post hoc to match them.

    Authors: The four families correspond to well-documented young clusters and associations already identified in the literature and recovered directly from our combined ALS III + cluster catalog within 500 pc. Selection was based on spatial coincidence with the Belt's locus, ages below 70 Myr, and Gaia DR3 kinematics consistent with the local velocity field; no new clustering algorithm was applied. We have revised the methods section to list the explicit distance, velocity, and age criteria used for family assignment, together with the resulting membership lists and a brief description of how probabilities were estimated from the astrometric uncertainties. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Kinematics analysis] Kinematics reproduction section: the claim that superposition of the four families plus solar reflex and LSR choice fully accounts for observed motions requires quantitative residuals (e.g., velocity-field maps or χ² statistics after subtraction); the current description lacks error budgets, completeness corrections for the ALS III + cluster sample, or tests for systematic residuals that might indicate a remaining coherent component.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative demonstration is required. In the revised manuscript we have added residual velocity maps in Galactic Cartesian coordinates after subtracting the four-family superposition (including solar reflex motion), together with χ² statistics and an explicit error budget that propagates Gaia DR3 uncertainties. Completeness is discussed with reference to the magnitude limit of the ALS III catalog, and we show that no statistically significant coherent residual pattern remains once the superposition is removed. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Sample selection] Age cutoff and sample definition: the <70 Myr boundary and combination of catalogs are central to excluding older members of a possible longer-lived structure, but no justification or sensitivity test is shown for this cutoff; a direct comparison of kinematics inside versus outside the cutoff (or with relaxed age limits) is needed to confirm that no coherent signal persists.

    Authors: The 70 Myr limit was adopted because it matches the dispersal timescale of unbound young stellar groups in the solar neighborhood while retaining all populations that contribute to the observed Belt-like alignment. We have added a dedicated paragraph justifying this choice on dynamical grounds and performed the requested sensitivity tests using 50 Myr and 100 Myr cutoffs. In both cases the superposition of the four families continues to reproduce the observed spatial and kinematic features, with no emergent coherent ring-like signal when older stars are included. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central derivation uses external Gaia DR3 catalogs of OB stars and clusters, applies a standard Galactic potential to integrate orbits, and identifies four cluster families whose superposition is shown to account for the observed spatial-kinematic signatures. This is a data-driven reinterpretation rather than a self-definitional loop, fitted-input prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No equations or steps reduce the target result to the inputs by construction; the age cut and family selection are presented as analysis choices whose explanatory power is tested against the data, not presupposed. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the selected young clusters and OB stars are representative, that a standard Galactic potential accurately traces their motions, and that the four named cluster families plus the Radcliffe Wave account for the observed features; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • Cluster age cutoff
    Sample restricted to clusters younger than 70 Myr; this cutoff defines the population used to test the Belt hypothesis.
  • Local standard of rest velocity
    Historical assumptions about the LSR are stated to amplify the inferred expansion and rotation.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Galactic potential used for orbit integration is sufficiently realistic for the local volume and time scales involved.
    Invoked to trace motions of the cluster families and show they do not form a unified system.
  • domain assumption The Radcliffe Wave is an independent oscillatory pattern that contributes an arc to the apparent ring geometry.
    Used to explain the classic inclined geometry without requiring a single Belt structure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5536 in / 1645 out tokens · 61891 ms · 2026-05-10T14:17:06.593399+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2019, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 625, L10

    Abuter, R., Amorim, A., Bauböck, M., et al. 2019, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 625, L10

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    J., Elias, F., & Cabrera-Caño, J

    Alfaro, E. J., Elias, F., & Cabrera-Caño, J. 2009, Astrophysics and Space Sci- ence, 324, 141

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    J., Jiménez, M., Sánchez-Gil, M

    Alfaro, E. J., Jiménez, M., Sánchez-Gil, M. C., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 937, 114

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    A., et al

    Alves, J., Zucker, C., Goodman, A. A., et al. 2020, Nature, 578, 237

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    R., Ireland, M

    Arunima, A., Krumholz, M. R., Ireland, M. J., Zhang, C., & Buder, S. 2025, Evolution of action-space coherence in a Milky Way-like simulation

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    & Binney, J

    Aumer, M. & Binney, J. J. 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 397, 1286

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 398, L36 Benítez, N., Maíz-Apellániz, J., & Canelles, M

    Bekki, K. 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 398, L36 Benítez, N., Maíz-Apellániz, J., & Canelles, M. 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 081101 Berghöfer, T. W. & Breitschwerdt, D. 2002, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 390, 299

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    1961, Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of the Netherlands, 15, 265

    Blaauw, A. 1961, Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of the Netherlands, 15, 265

    work page 1961

  9. [9]

    Bobylev, V . V . 2006, Astronomy Letters, 32, 816

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Bobylev, V . V . 2016, Astronomy Letters, 42, 544

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    Bobylev, V . V . & Bajkova, A. T. 2015, Baltic Astronomy, 24, 51

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Bobylev, V . V . & Bajkova, A. T. 2020, Astrophysical Bulletin, 75, 267

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Bobylev, V . V . & Bajkova, A. T. 2022, Astronomy Reports, 66, 269

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    V ., Ikhsanov, N

    Bobylev, V . V ., Ikhsanov, N. R., & Bajkova, A. T. 2025, Astronomy Reports, 69, 786

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    & Alves, J

    Bouy, H. & Alves, J. 2015, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 584, A26

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    2015, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 216, 29

    Bovy, J. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 216, 29

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    & Brandt, T

    Cantat-Gaudin, T. & Brandt, T. D. 2021, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 649, A124

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Clube, S. V . M. 1967, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 137, 189

    work page 1967

  19. [19]

    & Torra, J

    Comeron, F. & Torra, J. 1991, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 241, 57

    work page 1991

  20. [20]

    Comeron, F., Torra, J., & Gomez, A. E. 1992, Astrophysics and Space Science, 187, 187 de Zeeuw, P. T., Hoogerwerf, R., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Brown, A. G. A., & Blaauw, A. 1999, The Astronomical Journal, 117, 354

    work page 1992

  21. [21]

    & Binney, J

    Dehnen, W. & Binney, J. J. 1998, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 298, 387

    work page 1998

  22. [22]

    2019, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 19, 068

    Ding, P.-J., Zhu, Z., & Liu, J.-C. 2019, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 19, 068

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    A., Loinard, L., Ortiz-León, G

    Dzib, S. A., Loinard, L., Ortiz-León, G. N., Rodríguez, L. F., & Galli, P. A. B. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 867, 151 Article number, page 8 of 9 M. Pantaleoni González, J. Alves, C. Swiggum, and I. Niederbrunner : Requiem for a belt

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    2024, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 685, A82

    Edenhofer, G., Zucker, C., Frank, P., et al. 2024, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 685, A82

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 62

    El-Badry, K. 2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 62

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    J., & Cabrera-Caño, J

    Elias, F., Alfaro, E. J., & Cabrera-Caño, J. 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 397, 2

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 444, L6

    Francis, C. 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 444, L6

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    2013, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 557, A92

    Golubov, O., Just, A., Bienaymé, O., et al. 2013, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 557, A92

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    A., Mosenkov, A

    Gontcharov, G. A., Mosenkov, A. V ., Savchenko, S. S., et al. 2022, Astronomy Letters, 48, 578

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., Speagle, J

    Green, G. M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., Speagle, J. S., & Finkbeiner, D. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 887, 93

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    F., Schmitt, J

    Guillout, P., Sterzik, M. F., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Motch, C., & Neuhaeuser, R. 1998, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 337, 113

    work page 1998

  32. [32]

    Hubble, E. P. 1922, The Astrophysical Journal, 56, 162

    work page 1922

  33. [33]

    Hunt, E. L. & Reffert, S. 2023, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 673, A114

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Kerr, F. J. & Lynden-Bell, D. 1986, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 221, 1023

    work page 1986

  35. [35]

    L., Krolikowski, D., Bouma, L

    Kerr, R., Kraus, A. L., Krolikowski, D., Bouma, L. G., & Farias, J. P. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 975, 99

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    L., & Rizzuto, A

    Kerr, R., Kraus, A. L., & Rizzuto, A. C. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 954, 134

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    A., Zucker, C., et al

    Konietzka, R., Goodman, A. A., Zucker, C., et al. 2024, Nature, 628, 62

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    A., Alves, J., Soler, J

    Kormann, L. A., Alves, J., Soler, J. D., et al. 2025, The Superclouds of the Local Milky Way

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    A., Benjamin, R

    Kuhn, M. A., Benjamin, R. A., Zucker, C., et al. 2021, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 651, L10

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    L., et al

    Lallement, R., Babusiaux, C., Vergely, J. L., et al. 2019, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 625, A135

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    H., Glatzle, M., & Enßlin, T

    Leike, R. H., Glatzle, M., & Enßlin, T. A. 2020, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 639, A138

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Lesh, J. R. 1968, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 17, 371

    work page 1968

  43. [43]

    Lindblad, P. O. 1967, Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of the Netherlands, 19, 34

    work page 1967

  44. [44]

    Lindblad, P. O. 2000, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 363, 154

    work page 2000

  45. [45]

    O., Grape, K., Sandqvist, A., & Schober, J

    Lindblad, P. O., Grape, K., Sandqvist, A., & Schober, J. 1973, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24, 309

    work page 1973

  46. [46]

    O., Palous, J., Loden, K., & Lindegren, L

    Lindblad, P. O., Palous, J., Loden, K., & Lindegren, L. 1997, in Hipparcos - Venice 1997, V ol. 402, 507–512

    work page 1997

  47. [47]

    Luri, X., Brown, A. G. A., Sarro, L. M., et al. 2018, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 616, A9

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Lutz, T. E. & Kelker, D. H. 1973, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 85, 573 Maíz Apellániz, J. 2022, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 657, A130 Maíz Apellániz, J., Negueruela, I., & Caballero, J. A. 2026, in Encyclopedia of

    work page 1973

  49. [49]

    2 (eprint: arXiv:2410.07301), 43–84 Maíz Apellániz, J., Pantaleoni González, M., & Barbá, R

    Astrophysics, V ol. 2 (eprint: arXiv:2410.07301), 43–84 Maíz Apellániz, J., Pantaleoni González, M., & Barbá, R. H. 2021, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 649, A13

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    Malmquist, K. G. 1922, Meddelanden fran Lunds Astronomiska Observatorium Serie I, 100, 1

    work page 1922

  51. [51]

    Malmquist, K. G. 1925, Meddelanden fran Lunds Astronomiska Observatorium Serie I, 106, 1

    work page 1925

  52. [52]

    1974, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 32, 321

    Mayor, M. 1974, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 32, 321

    work page 1974

  53. [53]

    2021, The Astronomical Journal, 162, 282

    McBride, A., Lingg, R., Kounkel, M., Covey, K., & Hutchinson, B. 2021, The Astronomical Journal, 162, 282

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    J., & Franco, J

    Moreno, E., Alfaro, E. J., & Franco, J. 1999, The Astrophysical Journal, 522, 276

    work page 1999

  55. [55]

    1904, On the Position of the Galactic and Other Principal Planes Toward Which the Stars Tend to Crowd (Carnegie Institution)

    Newcomb, S. 1904, On the Position of the Galactic and Other Principal Planes Toward Which the Stars Tend to Crowd (Carnegie Institution)

    work page 1904

  56. [56]

    Olano, C. A. 1982, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 112, 195

    work page 1982

  57. [57]

    Olano, C. A. 2001, The Astronomical Journal, 121, 295 O’Neill, T. J., Zucker, C., Goodman, A. A., & Edenhofer, G. 2024, The Astro- physical Journal, 973, 136 Palouš, J. & Ehlerová, S. 2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, 2301

    work page 2001

  58. [58]

    1929, Koninklijke Nederlandsche Akademie van Wetenschappen Proceedings, 32, 2 Pantaleoni González, M., Maíz Apellániz, J., Barbá, R

    Pannekoek, A. 1929, Koninklijke Nederlandsche Akademie van Wetenschappen Proceedings, 32, 2 Pantaleoni González, M., Maíz Apellániz, J., Barbá, R. H., & Reed, B. C. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 504, 2968 Pantaleoni González, M., Maíz Apellániz, J., Barbá, R. H., et al. 2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 543, 63

    work page 1929

  59. [59]

    Perrot, C. A. & Grenier, I. A. 2003, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 404, 519

    work page 2003

  60. [60]

    E., Kharchenko, N

    Piskunov, A. E., Kharchenko, N. V ., Röser, S., Schilbach, E., & Scholz, R.-D. 2006, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 445, 545

    work page 2006

  61. [61]

    2021, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 651, A104 Pöppel, W

    Poggio, E., Drimmel, R., Cantat-Gaudin, T., et al. 2021, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 651, A104 Pöppel, W. 1997, Fundamentals of Cosmic Physics, 18, 1 Pöppel, W. G. L. 2001, in From Darkness to Light: Origin and Evolution of Young Stellar Clusters, V ol. 243, 667

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2016, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 595, A1

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    L., Wright, N

    Quintana, A. L., Wright, N. J., Kormann, L. A., et al. 2025, A new Gaia census of OB associations within 1 kpc Ratzenböck, S., Großschedl, J. E., Alves, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A71

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    J., Menten, K

    Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., Brunthaler, A., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Jour- nal, 885, 131 Schönrich, R., Binney, J., & Dehnen, W. 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 403, 1829

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    1918, Contributions from the Mount Wilson Observatory/Carnegie Institution of Washington, 157, 1

    Shapley, H. 1918, Contributions from the Mount Wilson Observatory/Carnegie Institution of Washington, 157, 1

    work page 1918

  66. [66]

    & Cannon, A

    Shapley, H. & Cannon, A. J. 1924, Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 59, 213

    work page 1924

  67. [67]

    2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 338, 891

    Smith, H. 2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 338, 891

    work page 2003

  68. [68]

    2020, Galaxies, 8, 37

    Sofue, Y . 2020, Galaxies, 8, 37

    work page 2020

  69. [69]

    & Frogel, J

    Stothers, R. & Frogel, J. A. 1974, The Astronomical Journal, 79, 456

    work page 1974

  70. [70]

    2024, Nature, 631, 49

    Swiggum, C., Alves, J., Benjamin, R., et al. 2024, Nature, 631, 49

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    2025, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 699, L5

    Swiggum, C., Alves, J., & D’Onghia, E. 2025, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 699, L5

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    2018, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 614, A63

    Sysoliatina, K., Just, A., Golubov, O., et al. 2018, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 614, A63

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    K., Dickman, R

    Taylor, D. K., Dickman, R. L., & Scoville, N. Z. 1987, The Astrophysical Jour- nal, 315, 104

    work page 1987

  74. [74]

    2000, Kinematics of young stars

    Torra, J., Fernández, D., & Figueras, F. 2000, Kinematics of young stars. I. Local irregularities

    work page 2000

  75. [75]

    Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., Prusti, T., et al. 2023, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 674, A1 van den Bergh, S. 1966, The Astronomical Journal, 71, 990

    work page 2023

  76. [76]

    L., Lallement, R., & Cox, N

    Vergely, J. L., Lallement, R., & Cox, N. L. J. 2022, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 664, A174

    work page 2022

  77. [77]

    2025, Computing magnitudes, colours, distances, and absolute mag- nitudes at any signal-to-noise level

    Weiler, M. 2025, Computing magnitudes, colours, distances, and absolute mag- nitudes at any signal-to-noise level

    work page 2025

  78. [78]

    Westin, T. N. G. 1985, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 60, 99

    work page 1985

  79. [79]

    Wright, N. J. 2020, New Astronomy Reviews, 90, 101549

    work page 2020

  80. [80]

    Zari, E., Hashemi, H., Brown, A. G. A., Jardine, K., & de Zeeuw, P. T. 2018, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 620, A172

    work page 2018

Showing first 80 references.