pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13338 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 🧮 math.AP · physics.flu-dyn

The Ladyzhenskaya-Prodi-Serrin Conditions and the Search for Extreme Behavior in 3D Navier-Stokes Flows

Elkin Ram\'irez , Bartosz Protas This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP physics.flu-dyn
keywords Navier-Stokes equationsLadyzhenskaya-Prodi-Serrin conditionsfinite-time singularitiesvariational optimization3D incompressible flowenstrophy growthcomputational search
0
0 comments X

The pith

Computational optimization of 3D Navier-Stokes initial data to maximize LPS integrals finds no unbounded growth or singularities, but measures how close the flows come to blowup.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks potential finite-time singularities in 3D Navier-Stokes solutions by solving variational optimization problems that maximize the time integrals appearing in the Ladyzhenskaya-Prodi-Serrin regularity criteria or the terminal L^3 norm. These problems are posed over families of initial conditions in both Lebesgue spaces L^q and the largest embedded Sobolev spaces H^s, with increasing sizes of the initial data. The resulting extreme flows remain regular, with all monitored quantities staying bounded, yet they reach a transient regime of rapid norm growth whose rate matches the scaling expected for a singularity. This numerical search matters because it supplies concrete quantitative information on how close physically relevant flows can come to violating the known sufficient conditions for smoothness without actually doing so.

Core claim

We identify initial conditions that locally maximize the integrals ∫ ||u(t)||_L^q^p dt for 2/p + 3/q = 1 and q > 3, or the value ||u(T)||_L^3, over chosen time windows T. In every case the optimized flows exhibit bounded LPS integrals and L^3 norms with no evidence of unbounded growth. The extreme flows do enter a regime in which the L^q norms and the enstrophy grow at rates consistent with finite-time singularity formation, but this growth is not sustained long enough for singularities to develop.

What carries the argument

Variational PDE optimization problems that maximize the Ladyzhenskaya-Prodi-Serrin integrals or terminal L^3 norm over initial data in L^q or H^s spaces.

If this is right

  • The LPS integrals remain bounded for all locally maximal flows generated this way.
  • Enstrophy and L^q norms undergo transient amplification at the precise scaling rates predicted for finite-time blowup.
  • No singularity forms on the time intervals examined even for the largest initial-data sizes considered.
  • The distance to singularity can be quantified by how long the critical growth rate is maintained before it decays.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same optimization framework could be rerun with adaptive meshes or longer time horizons to test whether sustained critical growth eventually appears.
  • The observed transient critical regime supplies concrete flow structures that any analytical proof of regularity must accommodate or rule out.
  • If global maximizers exist they may lie outside the spaces currently discretized, suggesting a need for different functional settings in future searches.

Load-bearing premise

The optimization problems reach global rather than merely local maximizers and the spatial discretization is fine enough to capture any true singularity if one were present.

What would settle it

A refined-grid computation of the same optimization problems that produces an unbounded LPS integral or L^3 norm inside the chosen time window would show that singularities are reachable.

read the original abstract

In this investigation, we conduct a systematic computational search for potential singularities in 3D Navier-Stokes flows on a periodic domain $\Omega$ based on the Ladyzhenskaya-Prodi-Serrin conditions. They assert that for a solution $\mathbf{u}(t)$ of the Navier-Stokes system to be regular on an interval $[0,T]$, the integral $\int_{0}^T \|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{L^q}^p\,dt$, where $2/p+3/q=1,\;q>3$, and the expression $\sup_{t \in [0,T]} \|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{L^3}$ must be bounded. Flows which might become singular and violate these conditions are sought by solving a family of variational PDE optimization problems where we identify initial conditions $\mathbf{u}_{0}$ with the corresponding flows $\mathbf{u}(t)$ locally maximizing the integral $\int_{0}^T \|\mathbf{u}(t)\|_{L^q}^p\,dt$ for a range of different values of $q$ and $p$ or the norm $\|\mathbf{u}(T)\|_{L^3}$ for different time windows $T$ and increasing sizes $\| \mathbf{u}_0 \|_{L^q}$ of the initial data. We consider two formulations where these expressions are maximized over appropriate Lebesgue spaces $L^q(\Omega)$ or the largest Hilbert-Sobolev spaces $H^s(\Omega)$ embedded in them. The lack of Hilbert-space structure in the first case necessitates development of a novel computational approach to solve the problem. While no evidence of unbounded growth of the quantities of interest, and hence also for singularity formation, was detected, we were able to quantify how "close" the flows realizing such worst-case scenarios come to forming a singularity. A comparison of these results with estimates on the rate of growth of the norms $||\mathbf{u}(t)||_{L^q}$ and of the enstrophy $\mathcal{E}(t)$ indicates that the extreme flows do enter a regime where these quantities are amplified at a rate consistent with singularity formation in finite time, but this growth is not sustained long enough for singularities to form.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a computational search for potential singularities in 3D periodic Navier-Stokes flows by formulating and solving families of variational PDE optimization problems. These problems identify initial data u0 that locally maximize either the Ladyzhenskaya-Prodi-Serrin integrals ∫_0^T ||u(t)||_{L^q}^p dt (for 2/p + 3/q = 1, q > 3) or the terminal norm ||u(T)||_{L^3}, over initial data in L^q or embedded H^s spaces and for varying parameter ranges. The authors report that no unbounded growth in the targeted quantities is observed, allowing them to quantify how close the resulting extreme flows come to the LPS thresholds; they further note that these flows exhibit transient amplification rates of ||u(t)||_{L^q} and enstrophy consistent with finite-time blow-up, but that the growth is not sustained long enough to produce singularities. A novel optimization method is introduced to handle the non-Hilbert Lebesgue-space case.

Significance. If the reported solutions are global maximizers and the spatial-temporal discretizations are sufficiently resolved, the work would supply concrete numerical evidence that 3D Navier-Stokes solutions remain regular under the LPS conditions, together with quantitative diagnostics of proximity to singularity formation. The development of a computational framework for optimization in non-Hilbert spaces constitutes a technical contribution that may be reusable in other PDE-constrained optimization settings.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2 and §5.1] §4.2 (variational formulation) and §5.1 (optimization algorithm): the central claim that 'no evidence of unbounded growth' was detected rests on the computed flows being global maximizers of the LPS integrals or sup L^3 norm. The manuscript describes a novel method for the non-Hilbert case but provides no diagnostics (multiple random initializations, comparison against known a-priori bounds, or convexity arguments) establishing that the reported solutions are not merely local maxima; if only local maxima are attained, other initial data could produce strictly larger values that cross the LPS threshold.
  2. [§6 and §7] §6 (numerical results) and §7 (growth-rate comparison): the assertion that growth 'is not sustained long enough for singularities to form' requires that the chosen time windows T and the spatial discretization resolve any incipient blow-up. No mesh-convergence studies, a-posteriori error indicators on enstrophy or L^q norms, or resolution diagnostics are reported; without these, the observed saturation could be an artifact of under-resolution rather than a genuine dynamical feature.
  3. [§3.3] §3.3 (parameter selection): the free parameters p, q, T, and ||u0||_L^q are varied over discrete ranges, yet no systematic study is given of how the maximal values scale with these parameters or of whether the chosen ranges are sufficient to capture possible blow-up scenarios. This choice directly affects the strength of the conclusion that growth is never sustained.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that a 'novel computational approach' is developed but gives no indication of its key ingredients (e.g., the treatment of the non-Hilbert constraint or the adjoint-based gradient computation); a one-sentence summary would improve readability.
  2. [§2] Notation for the enstrophy E(t) is introduced only in the results section; an explicit definition in §2 would aid readers unfamiliar with the precise normalization used.
  3. [Figures 4-7] Several figures (e.g., those showing time evolution of the maximized norms) would benefit from log-linear insets or tabulated maximal values to make the 'closeness to singularity' quantification more transparent.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned for the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2 and §5.1] §4.2 (variational formulation) and §5.1 (optimization algorithm): the central claim that 'no evidence of unbounded growth' was detected rests on the computed flows being global maximizers of the LPS integrals or sup L^3 norm. The manuscript describes a novel method for the non-Hilbert case but provides no diagnostics (multiple random initializations, comparison against known a-priori bounds, or convexity arguments) establishing that the reported solutions are not merely local maxima; if only local maxima are attained, other initial data could produce strictly larger values that cross the LPS threshold.

    Authors: We agree that global optimality cannot be rigorously established for this non-convex problem, and convexity arguments do not apply. In the revision we will add results from multiple random initializations, comparisons against available a priori bounds, and an explicit discussion in §5.1 of the local character of the optima together with the breadth of searches performed. These additions provide supporting evidence but do not constitute a proof of globality. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§6 and §7] §6 (numerical results) and §7 (growth-rate comparison): the assertion that growth 'is not sustained long enough for singularities to form' requires that the chosen time windows T and the spatial discretization resolve any incipient blow-up. No mesh-convergence studies, a-posteriori error indicators on enstrophy or L^q norms, or resolution diagnostics are reported; without these, the observed saturation could be an artifact of under-resolution rather than a genuine dynamical feature.

    Authors: We acknowledge that resolution diagnostics were not fully documented. The revised manuscript will include mesh-convergence studies for representative cases, a-posteriori error indicators on enstrophy and L^q norms, and explicit resolution diagnostics. These will confirm that the observed saturation reflects the dynamics rather than under-resolution. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§3.3] §3.3 (parameter selection): the free parameters p, q, T, and ||u0||_L^q are varied over discrete ranges, yet no systematic study is given of how the maximal values scale with these parameters or of whether the chosen ranges are sufficient to capture possible blow-up scenarios. This choice directly affects the strength of the conclusion that growth is never sustained.

    Authors: Parameter ranges were chosen from theoretical LPS considerations and computational feasibility. The revision will add a systematic scaling study, including additional computations on finer grids, to show how maximal values behave with p, q, T, and ||u0|| and to justify that the ranges suffice to detect sustained growth if present. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Rigorous proof that the reported solutions are global rather than local maximizers of the non-convex optimization problems.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct outputs of explicit variational maximization

full rationale

The paper's derivation consists of formulating and numerically solving a family of variational PDE optimization problems that directly maximize the LPS integrals ∫‖u(t)‖_L^q^p dt or the terminal L^3 norm over admissible initial data in L^q or H^s spaces. The reported findings—no evidence of unbounded growth and a quantification of proximity to the singularity threshold—are therefore literal numerical outcomes of these maximizations rather than quantities that have been presupposed, fitted, or renamed by construction. No self-citation chain, ansatz smuggling, or uniqueness theorem imported from prior work by the same authors is invoked to justify the central claim; the method is self-contained once the optimization problem is stated.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; the work assumes the Navier-Stokes equations on the torus, the validity of the LPS theorem, and that the chosen optimization formulation captures the worst-case behavior for singularity detection.

free parameters (2)
  • exponents p,q and time windows T
    Chosen to sample the LPS line 2/p + 3/q =1 with q>3; values affect which flows are extremized.
  • initial data size ||u0||_L^q
    Increased parametrically to probe larger Reynolds-number regimes.
axioms (2)
  • standard math The 3D incompressible Navier-Stokes equations on the periodic domain admit unique local-in-time smooth solutions for smooth initial data.
    Invoked implicitly when stating that singularities would violate LPS bounds.
  • domain assumption The Ladyzhenskaya-Prodi-Serrin theorem correctly identifies sufficient conditions for regularity.
    The entire search is predicated on this theorem.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5721 in / 1386 out tokens · 26511 ms · 2026-05-10T14:07:27.618476+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    avail- able athttp://www.claymath.org/sites/default/files/navierstokes.pdf

    Fefferman, C.L.: Existence and Smoothness of the Navier-Stokes Equation. avail- able athttp://www.claymath.org/sites/default/files/navierstokes.pdf. Clay Millennium Prize Problem Description (2000)

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995) 38

    Doering, C.R., Gibbon, J.D.: Applied Analysis of the Navier-Stokes Equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995) 38

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Majda, A.J., Bertozzi, A.L.: Vorticity and Incompressible Flow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    Gibbon, J.D., Bustamante, M., Kerr, R.M.: The three–dimensional Euler equations: singular or non–singular? Nonlinearity21, 123–129 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Acta Mathematica63(1), 193–248 (1934)

    Leray, J.: Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace. Acta Mathematica63(1), 193–248 (1934)

    work page 1934

  6. [6]

    Mathematische Nachrichten (4), 213–231 (1951)

    Hopf, E.: ¨ uber die aufgangswertaufgave f¨ ur die hydrodynamischen grundliechun- gen. Mathematische Nachrichten (4), 213–231 (1951)

    work page 1951

  7. [7]

    Albritton, E

    Albritton, D., Bru´ e, E., Colombo, M.: Non-uniqueness of Leray solutions of the forced Navier-Stokes equations. Annals of Mathematics196(1), 415–455 (2022) https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2022.196.1.3

    work page doi:10.4007/annals.2022.196.1.3 2022

  8. [8]

    Journal of Functional Analysis87, 359–369 (1989)

    Foias, C., Temam, R.: Gevrey class regularity for the solutions of the Navier– Stokes equations. Journal of Functional Analysis87, 359–369 (1989)

    work page 1989

  9. [9]

    Kiselev, A.A., Ladyzhenskaya, O.A.: On the existence and uniqueness of the solu- tion of the nonstationary problem for a viscous, incompressible fluid. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat21(5), 655–680 (1957)

    work page 1957

  10. [10]

    Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata48(1), 173–182 (1959) https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF02410664

    Prodi, G.: Un teorema di unicit` a per le equazioni di Navier-Stokes. Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata48(1), 173–182 (1959) https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF02410664

    work page 1959

  11. [11]

    Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis9(1), 187–195 (1962) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00253344

    Serrin, J.: On the interior regularity of weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis9(1), 187–195 (1962) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00253344

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00253344 1962

  12. [12]

    Russian Mathematical Surveys58(2), 211– 250 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1070/rm2003v058n02abeh000609

    Escauriaza, L., Seregin, G.A., Sverak, V.: L3,∞-solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations and backward uniqueness. Russian Mathematical Surveys58(2), 211– 250 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1070/rm2003v058n02abeh000609

    work page doi:10.1070/rm2003v058n02abeh000609 2003

  13. [13]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics130, 411–452 (1983)

    Brachet, M.E., Meiron, D.I., Orszag, S.A., Nickel, B.G., Morf, R.H., Frisch, U.: Small-scale structure of the Taylor-Green vortex. Journal of Fluid Mechanics130, 411–452 (1983)

    work page 1983

  14. [14]

    Pumir, A., Siggia, E.: Collapsing solutions to the 3D Euler equations. Phys. Fluids A2, 220–241 (1990)

    work page 1990

  15. [15]

    Fluid Dynamics Research8, 1–8 (1991)

    Brachet, M.E.: Direct simulation of three-dimensional turbulence in the Taylor- Green vortex. Fluid Dynamics Research8, 1–8 (1991)

    work page 1991

  16. [16]

    Kerr, R.M.: Evidence for a singularity of the three-dimensional, incompressible Euler equations. Phys. Fluids A5, 1725–1746 (1993) 39

    work page 1993

  17. [17]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics444, 299–320 (2001)

    Pelz, R.B.: Symmetry and the hydrodynamic blow-up problem. Journal of Fluid Mechanics444, 299–320 (2001)

    work page 2001

  18. [18]

    Physica D237, 1912–1920 (2008)

    Bustamante, M.D., Kerr, R.M.: 3D Euler about a 2D symmetry plane. Physica D237, 1912–1920 (2008)

    work page 1912

  19. [19]

    Ohkitani, K., Constantin, P.: Numerical study of the Eulerian–Lagrangian analysis of the Navier-Stokes turbulence. Phys. Fluids20, 1–11 (2008)

    work page 2008

  20. [20]

    Physica D237, 1932–1936 (2008)

    Grafke, T., Homann, H., Dreher, J., Grauer, R.: Numerical simulations of possi- ble finite-time singularities in the incompressible Euler equations: comparison of numerical methods. Physica D237, 1932–1936 (2008)

    work page 1932

  21. [21]

    Acta Numerica, 277–346 (2009)

    Hou, T.Y.: Blow-up or no blow-up? a unified computational and analytic approach to 3D incompressible Euler and Navier–Stokes equations. Acta Numerica, 277–346 (2009)

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics 690, 288–320 (2012)

    Orlandi, P., Pirozzoli, S., Carnevale, G.F.: Vortex events in Euler and Navier- Stokes simulations with smooth initial conditions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 690, 288–320 (2012)

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    Bustamante, M.D., Brachet, M.: Interplay between the Beale-Kato-Majda theorem and the analyticity-strip method to investigate numerically the incom- pressible Euler singularity problem. Phys. Rev. E86, 066302 (2012)

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    Physics of Fluids25, 065101 (2013)

    Kerr, R.M.: Swirling, turbulent vortex rings formed from a chain reaction of reconnection events. Physics of Fluids25, 065101 (2013)

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Journal of Turbulence15, 731–751 (2014)

    Orlandi, P., Pirozzoli, S., Bernardini, M., Carnevale, G.F.: A minimal flow unit for the study of turbulence with passive scalars. Journal of Turbulence15, 731–751 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Campolina, C.S., Mailybaev, A.A.: Chaotic blowup in the 3D incompressible Euler equations on a logarithmic lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 064501 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.064501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.064501 2018

  27. [27]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111(36), 12968– 12973 (2014)

    Luo, G., Hou, T.Y.: Potentially singular solutions of the 3D axisymmetric Euler equations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111(36), 12968– 12973 (2014)

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    SIAM: Multiscale Modeling and Simulation 12(4), 1722–1776 (2014)

    Luo, G., Hou, T.Y.: Toward the finite-time blowup of the 3D incompressible Euler equations: a numerical investigation. SIAM: Multiscale Modeling and Simulation 12(4), 1722–1776 (2014)

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 1–47 (2022) 40

    Hou, T.Y.: Potential singularity of the 3D Euler equations in the interior domain. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 1–47 (2022) 40

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Foun- dations of Computational Mathematics23, 2251–2299 (2022) https://doi.org/10

    Hou, T.: Potentially singular behavior of the 3D Navier–Stokes equations. Foun- dations of Computational Mathematics23, 2251–2299 (2022) https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10208-022-09578-4

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Indiana University Mathematics Journal 57, 2693–2727 (2008)

    Lu, L., Doering, C.R.: Limits on enstrophy growth for solutions of the three- dimensional Navier–Stokes equations. Indiana University Mathematics Journal 57, 2693–2727 (2008)

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics893, 22 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.204

    Kang, D., Yun, D., Protas, B.: Maximum amplification of enstrophy in three- dimensional Navier-Stokes flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics893, 22 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.204

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2020.204 2020

  33. [33]

    Journal of Nonlinear Science32(6), 81 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-022-09832-7

    Kang, D., Protas, B.: Searching for singularities in Navier–Stokes flows based on the Ladyzhenskaya–Prodi–Serrin conditions. Journal of Nonlinear Science32(6), 81 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-022-09832-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s00332-022-09832-7 2022

  34. [34]

    Physica D240, 1553–1563 (2011)

    Ayala, D., Protas, B.: On maximum enstrophy growth in a hydrodynamic system. Physica D240, 1553–1563 (2011)

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics742, 340–367 (2014)

    Ayala, D., Protas, B.: Maximum palinstrophy growth in 2D incompressible flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics742, 340–367 (2014)

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics837, 839–857 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.874

    Ayala, D., Doering, C.R., Simon, T.M.: Maximum palinstrophy amplification in the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations. Journal of Fluid Mechanics837, 839–857 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.874

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2017.874 2018

  37. [37]

    Journal of Nonlinear Science28(1), 395–422 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-017-9412-3

    Yun, D., Protas, B.: Maximum rate of growth of enstrophy in solutions of the fractional Burgers equation. Journal of Nonlinear Science28(1), 395–422 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-017-9412-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00332-017-9412-3 2018

  38. [38]

    Nonlinearity36(12), 7142 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-6544/ad073f

    Albritton, D., Nitti, N.D.: Sharp bounds on enstrophy growth for viscous scalar conservation laws. Nonlinearity36(12), 7142 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-6544/ad073f

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences380(2225), 20210035 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0035

    Protas, B.: Systematic search for extreme and singular behaviour in some funda- mental models of fluid mechanics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences380(2225), 20210035 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0035

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2021.0035 2022

  40. [40]

    Fluid Dynamics Research46(3), 031404 (2014)

    Ayala, D., Protas, B.: Vortices, maximum growth and the problem of finite-time singularity formation. Fluid Dynamics Research46(3), 031404 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics818, 772–806 (2017)

    Ayala, D., Protas, B.: Extreme vortex states and the growth of enstrophy in 3D incompressible flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics818, 772–806 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 41 (2016)

    Robinson, J.C., Rodrigo, J.L., Sadowski, W.: The Three-Dimensional Navier- Stokes Equations: Classical Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 41 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139095143

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139095143 2016

  43. [43]

    Arch Rational Mech Anal235, 99–139 (2020)

    Miller, E.: A regularity criterion for the Navier-Stokes equation involving only the middle eigenvalue of the strain tensor. Arch Rational Mech Anal235, 99–139 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    arXiv:1908.04958 (2020)

    Tao, T.: Quantitative bounds for critically bounded solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations. arXiv:1908.04958 (2020)

    work page arXiv 1908

  45. [45]

    In: Sirovich, L

    Constantin, P.: Remarks on the Navier-Stokes equations. In: Sirovich, L. (ed.) New Perspectives in Turbulence, pp. 229–261. Springer, Berlin (1991)

    work page 1991

  46. [46]

    Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Universit` a di Padova131, 159–178 (2014)

    Robinson, J.C., Sadowski, W.: A local smoothness criterion for solutions of the 3d navier-stokes equations. Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Universit` a di Padova131, 159–178 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    (in preparation) (2026)

    Bleitner, F., Protas, B.: On the sharpness of bounds on the rate of growth of Lebesgue norms of the velocity in Navier-Stokes flows. (in preparation) (2026)

    work page 2026

  48. [48]

    Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)

    Ruszczy´ nski, A.: Nonlinear Optimization. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)

    work page 2006

  49. [49]

    Numerische Mathematik20, 115–124 (1972)

    Golomb, M., Tampia, R.: The metric gradient in normed linear spaces. Numerische Mathematik20, 115–124 (1972)

    work page 1972

  50. [50]

    Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)

    Adams, R.A., Fournier, J.F.: Sobolev Spaces. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)

    work page 2005

  51. [51]

    SIAM, Philadelphia (2003)

    Gunzburger, M.D.: Perspectives in Flow Control and Optimization. SIAM, Philadelphia (2003)

    work page 2003

  52. [52]

    Journal of Computational Physics227, 6490–6510 (2008)

    Protas, B.: Adjoint-based optimization of PDE systems with alternative gradi- ents. Journal of Computational Physics227, 6490–6510 (2008)

    work page 2008

  53. [53]

    Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008)

    Absil, P.-A., Mahony, R., Sepulchre, R.: Optimization Algorithms on Matrix Manifolds. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008)

    work page 2008

  54. [54]

    Academic Press, New York (1977)

    Berger, M.S.: Nonlinearity and Functional Analysis. Academic Press, New York (1977)

    work page 1977

  55. [55]

    Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)

    Neuberger, J.: Sobolev Gradients and Differential Equations. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04041-2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04041-2 2010

  56. [56]

    Protas, B., Bewley, T., Hagen, G.: A Comprehensive Framework for the Regu- larization of Adjoint Analysis in Multiscale PDE Systems. J. Comp. Phys.195, 49–89 (2004)

    work page 2004

  57. [57]

    Nonlinear Analysis63, 2621–2628 (2005) 42

    Stein, I.: Conjugate gradient methods in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Analysis63, 2621–2628 (2005) 42

    work page 2005

  58. [58]

    PhD thesis, McMaster University (2025)

    Ram´ ırez, E.: Systematic search for extreme behavior in 3d Navier-Stokes flows based on the Ladyzhenskaya-Prodi-Serrin conditions. PhD thesis, McMaster University (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Frisch, U.: Turbulence, p. 296. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139170666 . The legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139170666 1995

  60. [60]

    Journal of Nonlinear Science33(6), 120 (2023)

    Zhao, X., Protas, B.: Systematic search for singularities in 3D Euler flows. Journal of Nonlinear Science33(6), 120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Scientific Computation

    Canuto, C., Quarteroni, A., Hussaini, Y., Zang, T.A.: Spectral Methods. Scientific Computation. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    work page 2006

  62. [62]

    Boyd, J.P.: Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods, 2nd edn., p. 668. Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY (2001)

    work page 2001

  63. [63]

    Bewley, T.R.: Numerical Renaissance, Renaissance Press (2009)

    work page 2009

  64. [64]

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (2003)

    Frigo, M., Johnson, S.G.: FFTW User’s Manual. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (2003). Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    work page 2003

  65. [65]

    Springer, New York (1999)

    Nocedal, J., Wright, S.J.: Numerical Optimization. Springer, New York (1999)

    work page 1999

  66. [66]

    Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P.: Numerical Recipes, 3rd edn., p. 1235. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007). The art of scientific computing 43

    work page 2007