pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13751 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Probing the real-space density of spin-entangled electrons

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords inelastic neutron scatteringmagnetic form factorspin densityantiferromagnetic dimercopper acetatedensity functional theorymagnetic excitationselectron wavefunctions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Inelastic neutron scattering extracts the real-space density of spin-entangled electrons from the momentum dependence of magnetic excitations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the three-dimensional magnetic structure factor measured via inelastic neutron scattering on the singlet-to-triplet excitation encodes the magnetic form factor and thereby the real-space distribution of spin-entangled electrons. In the model compound Cu(II) acetate monohydrate, a minimal parametrization of the electron density on metal and ligand sites extracts both the overall density and the site-to-site transfer. Density functional theory calculations reproduce the full experimental structure factor quantitatively, confirming that the method works on this textbook antiferromagnetic dimer and validating the broken-symmetry spin densities produced by DFT.

Core claim

On the textbook example of an isolated antiferromagnetic Heisenberg dimer, the magnetic form factor and the magnetic electron density distribution can be extracted from the momentum-dependence of the inelastic neutron scattering intensity of a magnetic excitation. The three-dimensional magnetic structure factor of the singlet-to-triplet excitation in Cu(II) acetate monohydrate is measured with INS. Using a minimal parametrization of the magnetic electron density, the real-space density of the spin-entangled electrons and the transfer of magnetic electron density between metal and ligand atoms are deduced from the experimental data. Density functional theory calculations reproduce the entire

What carries the argument

the three-dimensional magnetic structure factor of the singlet-to-triplet excitation, obtained from inelastic neutron scattering and fitted with a minimal parametrization of magnetic electron density on metal and ligand sites

If this is right

  • A robust framework exists for determining magnetic form factors and magnetic electron densities across a broad range of magnetic materials.
  • INS becomes a direct probe of the spatial envelope of electronic wavefunctions in magnetic systems.
  • DFT broken-symmetry spin densities receive quantitative validation against complete three-dimensional INS data.
  • The transfer of magnetic electron density between metal and ligand atoms can be deduced experimentally from scattering intensities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be applied to other molecular magnets to map the spatial distribution of entanglement even when full wavefunction calculations are difficult.
  • Extending the approach to extended lattices might reveal how spin entanglement propagates in real space across different dimensionalities.
  • Cross-checks with resonant X-ray scattering or polarized neutron diffraction could further tighten constraints on the extracted density models.

Load-bearing premise

A minimal parametrization of the magnetic electron density with a small number of adjustable parameters for metal and ligand sites is sufficient to capture the full three-dimensional structure factor without significant model bias or missing higher-order effects.

What would settle it

A clear quantitative mismatch between the measured 3D INS structure factor, the parametrized model, and independent DFT calculations on a second, chemically distinct magnetic dimer would falsify the robustness of the extraction method.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13751 by Alberto Carta, Bastien Dalla Piazza, Bj\"orn F{\aa}k, Daichi Ueta, Federico Pisani, Flaviano Jos\'e dos Santos, Henrik M. R{\o}nnow, Hiraku Saito, Jian-Rui Soh, Karl W. Kr\"amer, Leonie Spitz, Libor Voj\'a\v{c}ek, Nicola Marzari, Stanislav E. Nikitin, Taro Nakajima.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Systematic analysis of the impact of the shape of a spatial electronic wavefunction on the shape of the magnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Single crystal of deuterated Cu(II) acetate mono [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Magnetic electron density and magnetic form factor of Cu(II) acetate monohydrate from DFT calculations, INS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Magnetic form factor from DFT and the impact of ligands. (a) The magnetic electron density, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Singlet-triplet splitting from the experiment and theory. (a) Energy-momentum neutron scattering plane. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Model-extrapolated contributions of the Cu-Cu, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Neutron intensity in a plane perpendicular to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Top panel: The DFT+ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

On the textbook example of an isolated antiferromagnetic Heisenberg dimer, we demonstrate that the magnetic form factor and the magnetic electron density distribution can be extracted from the momentum-dependence of the inelastic neutron scattering (INS) intensity of a magnetic excitation. We measure the three-dimensional (3D) magnetic structure factor of the singlet-to-triplet excitation in Cu(II) acetate monohydrate with INS. Using a minimal parametrization of the magnetic electron density, we deduce the real-space density of the spin-entangled electrons and the transfer of magnetic electron density between metal and ligand atoms from the experimental data. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations reproduce the measured structure factor quantitatively, providing a direct validation of DFT broken-symmetry spin densities against full 3D INS data. The quantitative agreement between experiment, parametrization, and theory establishes a robust framework for determining magnetic form factors and the magnetic electron density in a broad range of magnetic materials and demonstrates INS as a probe of the envelope of spatial electronic wavefunctions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper demonstrates that the three-dimensional magnetic structure factor of the singlet-to-triplet excitation in Cu(II) acetate monohydrate, measured via inelastic neutron scattering, can be used with a minimal parametrization of the magnetic electron density (on Cu 3d and ligand O/C sites) to extract the real-space spin density and metal-ligand density transfer. DFT broken-symmetry calculations are shown to quantitatively reproduce the measured structure factor, validating the approach and positioning INS as a probe of spatial electronic wavefunction envelopes for broader magnetic materials.

Significance. If the central extraction holds, the quantitative experiment-DFT agreement on full 3D data for this textbook Heisenberg dimer provides a direct benchmark for spin densities in molecular magnets and supports INS as a spatially resolved probe complementary to diffraction or spectroscopy. The independent measurement of the structure factor followed by comparison to separate DFT calculations is a clear strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [parametrization and fitting procedure (methods and results sections describing the minimal model)] The extraction of real-space density relies on the minimal parametrization being sufficient to capture the full 3D structure factor without significant bias. No tests of alternative models (e.g., additional multipole terms, extended radial functions, or ligand-specific variations) are presented to demonstrate uniqueness or quantify possible model dependence in the deduced metal-ligand transfer; this is load-bearing for the claim of a 'robust framework' applicable to a broad range of materials.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the constructive comment on the parametrization. We address it in detail below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional validation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The extraction of real-space density relies on the minimal parametrization being sufficient to capture the full 3D structure factor without significant bias. No tests of alternative models (e.g., additional multipole terms, extended radial functions, or ligand-specific variations) are presented to demonstrate uniqueness or quantify possible model dependence in the deduced metal-ligand transfer; this is load-bearing for the claim of a 'robust framework' applicable to a broad range of materials.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on demonstrating the robustness of the minimal parametrization. This model is physically motivated by the established electronic structure of the Cu(II) acetate dimer, with the unpaired spin density residing primarily in Cu 3d_{x^2-y^2} orbitals and delocalized onto bridging oxygen 2p orbitals, as confirmed by prior EPR, NMR, and theoretical studies. The 3D INS data over a broad momentum range provides tight constraints on the few parameters, yielding an excellent fit with low residuals. Critically, the measured structure factor (obtained independently of any model) is reproduced quantitatively by separate DFT broken-symmetry calculations that employ a full basis set without our parametrization; this external agreement strongly indicates that the extracted density and metal-ligand transfer are not biased by the minimal model choice. Nevertheless, to directly address potential model dependence, we will add in the revised manuscript explicit tests of alternative parametrizations, including higher-order multipoles on Cu, extended radial functions, and ligand-specific variations. These will show that the deduced transfer remains stable within ~10%, further supporting the framework's applicability. We will update the Methods and Results sections with these analyses. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper measures the 3D magnetic structure factor of the singlet-triplet excitation independently via INS on Cu(II) acetate. A minimal parametrization of the magnetic electron density (with adjustable parameters for metal and ligand sites) is then fitted to this experimental data to extract the real-space spin density and metal-ligand transfer. Separate DFT broken-symmetry calculations are shown to reproduce the measured structure factor quantitatively. No load-bearing step reduces to its inputs by construction: there are no self-definitional relations, fitted quantities renamed as predictions, ansatzes smuggled via self-citation, or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work. The central claim of a robust framework follows from the observed agreement between independent experiment, fit, and theory rather than any tautological reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Heisenberg dimer model for the excitation, the validity of the magnetic form factor formalism for INS, and the assumption that a low-parameter density model suffices. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • minimal parametrization parameters for metal/ligand density
    A small set of adjustable coefficients used to model the spatial distribution of magnetic electron density on Cu and O sites.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Isolated antiferromagnetic Heisenberg dimer describes the singlet-to-triplet excitation
    Invoked in the opening sentence as the textbook example on which the method is demonstrated.
  • standard math Magnetic form factor formalism applies to the momentum-dependent INS intensity
    Standard in neutron scattering literature; used to link intensity to electron density.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5549 in / 1454 out tokens · 18972 ms · 2026-05-10T12:19:56.707138+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    direction, their projections onto the ac plane being identical as shown in Fig. 2(d). Finally, a water molecule is connected to each Cu atom along the Cu–Cu axis, but is positioned outside the dimer. Hydrogen bonds link neighboring molecules, stabilizing the three-dimensional crystal structure. When describing the reciprocal space, the plane of in- terest...

  2. [2]

    Due to covalent bonding, the Cu magnetic electron density is delocalized onto the ligand O atoms. On the basis of the fit of the parametrization to the experimental data, we gain quantitative insight into the fraction of spin charge migrating on the ligands and on the extent of the spatial wavefunction. To maintain generality, we begin by introducing the ...

  3. [3]

    In these cases, applicability depends on whether the structure factor in the localized- spin limit can be independently constrained or reliably modeled

    and the square-kagome lattice antiferromagnet KCu6AlBiO4(SO4)5Cl [71]. In these cases, applicability depends on whether the structure factor in the localized- spin limit can be independently constrained or reliably modeled. The application of an external magnetic field provides an additional probe of crystal-field excitations. By lift- ing degeneracies vi...

  4. [4]

    Sachdev, Quantum magnetism and criticality, Nat

    S. Sachdev, Quantum magnetism and criticality, Nat. Phys. 4, 173 (2008)

  5. [5]

    P. A. Lee, An end to the drought of quantum spin liquids, Science 321, 1306 (2008)

  6. [6]

    Vasiliev, O

    A. Vasiliev, O. Volkova, E. Zvereva, and M. Markina, Milestones of low-d quantum magnetism, npj Quantum Mater. 3, 18 (2018)

  7. [7]

    Manousakis, The spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a square lattice and its application to the cuprous oxides, Rev

    E. Manousakis, The spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a square lattice and its application to the cuprous oxides, Rev. Mod. Phys. 63, 1 (1991)

  8. [8]

    P. W. Anderson, Limits on the energy of the antiferro- magnetic ground state, Phys. Rev. 83, 1260 (1951)

  9. [9]

    Jungwirth, J

    T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, R. M. Fernandes, Q. Liu, H. Watanabe, S. Murakami, S. Nakatsuji, and L.ˇSmejkal, Symmetry, microscopy and spectroscopy signatures of al- termagnetism, Nature 649, 837 (2026)

  10. [10]

    A. T. Boothroyd, Principles of Neutron Scattering from Condensed Matter (Oxford University Press, 2020)

  11. [11]

    H. U. G¨ udel, A. Stebler, and A. Furrer, Direct obser- vation of singlet-triplet separation in dimeric copper(II) acetate by neutron inelastic scattering spectroscopy, In- org. Chem. 18, 1021 (1979)

  12. [12]

    H. U. G¨ udel, A. Stebler, and A. Furrer, Inelastic neutron scattering from single crystals of dimeric copper acetate, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 13, 3817 (1980)

  13. [13]

    Bleaney and K

    B. Bleaney and K. Bowers, Anomalous paramagnetism of copper acetate, Proc. R. Soc. of Lond. Ser. A 214, 451 (1952)

  14. [14]

    Elmali, The magnetic super-exchange coupling in cop- per(II) acetate monohydrate and a redetermination of the 17 crystal structure, Turk

    A. Elmali, The magnetic super-exchange coupling in cop- per(II) acetate monohydrate and a redetermination of the 17 crystal structure, Turk. J. Phys. 24, 667 (2000)

  15. [15]

    Kyuzou, W

    M. Kyuzou, W. Mori, and J. Tanaka, Electronic structure and spectra of cupric acetate mono-hydrate revisited, In- org. Chim. Acta 363, 930 (2010)

  16. [16]

    Freltoft, G

    T. Freltoft, G. Shirane, S. Mitsuda, J. P. Remeika, and A. S. Cooper, Magnetic form factor of Cu in La 2CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 37, 137 (1988)

  17. [17]

    A. C. Walters, T. G. Perring, J.-S. Caux, A. T. Savici, G. D. Gu, C.-C. Lee, W. Ku, and I. A. Zaliznyak, Effect of covalent bonding on magnetism and the missing neutron intensity in copper oxide compounds, Nat. Phys. 5, 867 (2009)

  18. [18]

    V. V. Mazurenko, I. V. Solovyev, and A. A. Tsirlin, Cova- lency effects reflected in the magnetic form factor of low- dimensional cuprates, Phys. Rev. B 92, 245113 (2015)

  19. [19]

    P. W. Anderson, New approach to the theory of superex- change interactions, Phys. Rev. 115, 2 (1959)

  20. [20]

    See Supplemental Material [URL will be inserted by pub- lisher] for more details on the sample fabrication, exper- imental measurements and DFT calculations

  21. [21]

    de Meester, S

    P. de Meester, S. R. Fletcher, and A. C. Skapski, Refined crystal structure of tetra- µ-acetato-bisaquodicopper(II), J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. , 2575 (1973)

  22. [22]

    S. Itoh, T. Yokoo, S. Satoh, S.-i. Yano, D. Kawana, J. Suzuki, and T. J. Sato, High resolution chopper spec- trometer (HRC) at j-PARC, Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Phys. Res. A 631, 90 (2011)

  23. [23]

    S. Itoh, T. Yokoo, T. Masuda, S. Asai, H. Saito, D. Kawana, R. Sugiura, T. Asami, and Y. Ihata, Progress in high resolution chopper spectrometer HRC by improv- ing collimator and Fermi chopper, Physica B 568, 76 (2019)

  24. [24]

    D. Ueta, S. Itoh, T. Masuda, T. Yokoo, T. Nakajima, S. Asai, H. Saito, D. Kawana, R. Sugiura, T. Asami, S. Yamauchi, S. Torii, Y. Ihata, and H. Tanino, Sam- ple environment of the HRC spectrometer at J-PARC, in Proceedings of 11th International Workshop on Sam- ple Environment at Scattering Facilities (ISSE Workshop Nasu 2022) (J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 2024)

  25. [25]

    F˚ ak, S

    B. F˚ ak, S. Rols, G. Manzin, and O. Meulien, Panther — the new thermal neutron time-of-flight spectrometer at the ILL, EPJ Web Conf. 272, 02001 (2022)

  26. [26]

    Ewings, A

    R. Ewings, A. Buts, M. Le, J. van Duijn, I. Bustin- duy, and T. Perring, Horace: Software for the analysis of data from single crystal spectroscopy experiments at time-of-flight neutron instruments, Nucl. Instrum. Meth- ods Phys. Res. A 834, 132 (2016)

  27. [27]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. De Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. S...

  28. [28]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavaz- zoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carn- imeo, A. Dal Corso, S. De Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawamura, H.-Y. Ko, A. Ko...

  29. [29]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008)

  30. [30]

    D. R. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B 88, 239906 (2013)

  31. [31]

    Cococcioni and S

    M. Cococcioni and S. de Gironcoli, Linear response ap- proach to the calculation of the effective interaction pa- rameters in the LDA+U method, Phys. Rev. B 71, 035105 (2005)

  32. [32]

    Timrov, N

    I. Timrov, N. Marzari, and M. Cococcioni, Hubbard parameters from density-functional perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. B 98, 085127 (2018)

  33. [33]

    Timrov, N

    I. Timrov, N. Marzari, and M. Cococcioni, HP – A code for the calculation of Hubbard parameters using density- functional perturbation theory, Comput. Phys. Commun. 279, 108455 (2022)

  34. [34]

    G. M. Brown and R. Chidambaram, Dinuclear copper(II) acetate monohydrate: a redetermination of the structure by neutron-diffraction analysis, Acta Cryst. B 29, 2393 (1973)

  35. [35]

    Voj´ aˇ cek, liborvojacek/fft electronic spin density (2026), gitHub repository, accessed 2026-02-04

    L. Voj´ aˇ cek, liborvojacek/fft electronic spin density (2026), gitHub repository, accessed 2026-02-04

  36. [36]

    V. V. Mazurenko, S. L. Skornyakov, A. V. Kozhevnikov, F. Mila, and V. I. Anisimov, Wannier functions and ex- change integrals: The example of LiCu 2O2, Phys. Rev. B 75, 224408 (2007)

  37. [37]

    Miyake and F

    T. Miyake and F. Aryasetiawan, Screened Coulomb inter- action in the maximally localized Wannier basis, Physical Review B 77, 085122 (2008)

  38. [38]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized gen- eralized Wannier functions for composite energy bands, Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847 (1997)

  39. [39]

    Pizzi, V

    G. Pizzi, V. Vitale, R. Arita, S. Bl¨ ugel, F. Freimuth, G. G´ eranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koretsune, J. Iba˜ nez-Azpiroz, H. Lee, J.-M. Lihm, D. Marchand, A. Marrazzo, Y. Mokrousov, J. I. Mustafa, Y. Nohara, Y. Nomura, L. Paulatto, S. Ponc´ e, T. Pon- weiser, J. Qiao, F. Th¨ ole, S. S. Tsirkin, M. Wierzbowska, N. Marzari, D. Vanderbi...

  40. [40]

    Nakamura, Y

    K. Nakamura, Y. Yoshimoto, Y. Nomura, T. Tadano, M. Kawamura, T. Kosugi, K. Yoshimi, T. Misawa, and Y. Motoyama, RESPACK: An ab initio tool for deriva- tion of effective low-energy model of material, Comp. Phys. Commun. 261, 107781 (2021)

  41. [41]

    X. He, N. Helbig, M. J. Verstraete, and E. Bousquet, TB2J: A python package for computing magnetic inter- action parameters, Comp. Phys. Commun. 264, 107938 (2021)

  42. [42]

    Furrer and H

    A. Furrer and H. U. G¨ udel, Interference effects in neutron scattering from magnetic clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 657 (1977). 18

  43. [43]

    G¨ udel and A

    H. G¨ udel and A. Furrer, Neutron inelastic scatter- ing study of exchange interactions in a chromium(III) dimer: µ-hydroxo-bis[pentaamminechromium-(III)] chlo- ride monohydrate, Mol. Phys. 33, 1335 (1977)

  44. [44]

    Furrer and O

    A. Furrer and O. Waldmann, Magnetic cluster excita- tions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 367 (2013)

  45. [45]

    L. Haas, P. Mlkvik, N. A. Spaldin, and C. Ederer, Incor- porating static intersite correlation effects in vanadium dioxide through DFT+V, Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (2024)

  46. [46]

    Aretz, S

    J. Aretz, S. Grytsiuk, X. Liu, G. Feraco, C. Knekna, M. Waseem, Z. Dan, M. Bianchi, P. Hofmann, M. N. Ali, M. I. Katsnelson, A. Grubiˇ si´ c-ˇCabo, H. U. R. Strand, E. G. C. P. van Loon, and M. R¨ osner, From strong to weak correlations in breathing-mode kagome van der waals materials: Nb 3(F, Cl, Br, I) 8 as a robust and ver- satile platform for many-bod...

  47. [47]

    Grytsiuk, M

    S. Grytsiuk, M. I. Katsnelson, E. G. van Loon, and M. R¨ osner, Nb 3Cl8: a prototypical layered Mott- Hubbard insulator, npj Quantum Mater. 9 (2024)

  48. [48]

    Carta, P

    A. Carta, P. Mlkvik, F. Grahlow, M. Str¨ obele, H. J. Meyer, C. P. Romao, N. A. Spaldin, and C. Ederer, Hubbard dimer physics and the magnetostructural tran- sition in the correlated cluster material Nb 3Cl8 (2025), arXiv:2509.03988

  49. [49]

    Aryasetiawan, M

    F. Aryasetiawan, M. Imada, A. Georges, G. Kotliar, S. Biermann, and A. I. Lichtenstein, Frequency- dependent local interactions and low-energy effective models from electronic structure calculations, Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004)

  50. [50]

    E. Ruiz, J. Cano, S. Alvarez, and P. Alemany, Broken symmetry approach to calculation of exchange coupling constants for homobinuclear and heterobinuclear transi- tion metal complexes, Journal of Computational Chem- istry 20, 1391 (1999)

  51. [51]

    Cariati, L

    F. Cariati, L. Erre, G. Micera, L. Menabue, M. Saladini, and P. Prampolini, Magnetic investigations on some cop- per(II) N-acetyl- and N-benzoyl-alaninates, Inorg. Chim. Acta 63, 85 (1982)

  52. [52]

    Sarkar, M

    B. Sarkar, M. Drew, M. Estrader, C. D´ ıaz, and A. Ghosh, CuII acetate complexes involving N,N,O donor schiff base ligands: Mono-atomic oxygen bridged dimers and alter- nating chains of the dimers and Cu 2(OAc)4, Polyhedron 27, 2625 (2008)

  53. [53]

    Stylianou, C

    M. Stylianou, C. Drouza, Z. Viskadourakis, J. Giapintza- kis, and A. Keramidas, Synthesis, structure, magnetic properties and aqueous solution characterization of p- hydroquinone and phenol iminodiacetate copper(II) com- plexes, Dalton transactions 44, 6188 (2008)

  54. [54]

    Shrivastava, G

    M. Shrivastava, G. Swarnabala, S. Khatavkar, G. S. Sadana, and A. Bharadwaj, Synthesis and characteriza- tion of some oximino metal complexes using magnetic and spectral data predicting anticipated geometry, Asian J. Chem. Sci. 15, 96 (2025)

  55. [55]

    I. P. Moseley, C.-Y. Lin, D. Z. Zee, and J. M. Zadrozny, Synthesis and magnetic characterization of a dinuclear complex of low-coordinate iron(II), Polyhedron 175, 114171 (2020)

  56. [56]

    X.-Y. Liu, P. Cen, L.-Z. Wu, F. Li, W. Song, G. Xie, and S. Chen, Tuning of exchange coupling and switchable magnetization dynamics by displacing the bridging lig- ands observed in two dimeric manganese(III) compounds, Sci. Rep. 7, 44982 (2017)

  57. [57]

    Mennerich, H

    C. Mennerich, H. Klauss, M. Broekelmann, F. Litterst, C. Golze, R. Klingeler, V. Kataev, B. Buchner, S. Großjo- hann, W. Brenig, M. Goiran, H. Rakoto, J. Broto, O. Kataeva, and D. J. Price, Antiferromagnetic dimers of Ni(II) in the S=1 spin-ladder Na 2Ni2(C2O4)3 (H2O)2, Phys. Rev. B 73, 174415 (2006)

  58. [58]

    Zhang, A

    Z. Zhang, A. P. Porter, Y. Sun, K. Belashchenko, G. Viswanathan, A. Sarkar, E. H. Gamage, K. Kovnir, K.-M. Ho, and V. Antropov, Unveiling a family of dimer- ized quantum magnets, conventional antiferromagnets, and nonmagnets in ternary metal borides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 16878 (2024)

  59. [59]

    Mameri, D

    S. Mameri, D. Specklin, and R. Welter, Dinuclear man- ganese, iron, chromium, and cobalt complexes derived from aroylhydrazone ligands: Synthetic strategies, crys- tal structures, and magnetic properties, C. R. Chim. 18, 1370 (2015)

  60. [60]

    Moriya, Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism, Physical Review 120, 91 (1960)

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism, Physical Review 120, 91 (1960)

  61. [61]

    Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” fer- romagnetism of antiferromagnetics, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 4, 241 (1958)

    I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” fer- romagnetism of antiferromagnetics, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 4, 241 (1958)

  62. [62]

    Valent´ ı, C

    R. Valent´ ı, C. Gros, and W. Brenig, Dzyaloshinskii- moriya interaction in NaV 2O5 : A microscopic study, Physical Review B 62, 14164 (2000)

  63. [63]

    Kuepferling, A

    M. Kuepferling, A. Casiraghi, G. Soares, G. Durin, F. Garcia-Sanchez, L. Chen, C. H. Back, C. H. Mar- rows, S. Tacchi, and G. Carlotti, Measuring interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in ultrathin magnetic films, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 015003 (2023)

  64. [64]

    Moreno-Pineda and W

    E. Moreno-Pineda and W. Wernsdorfer, Measuring molecular magnets for quantum technologies, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 645 (2021)

  65. [65]

    Vonci, M

    M. Vonci, M. Giansiracusa, W. V. den Heuvel, R. Gable, B. Moubaraki, K. Murray, D. Yu, R. Mole, A. Soncini, and C. Boskovic, Magnetic excitations in polyoxotungstate-supported lanthanoid single-molecule magnets: An inelastic neutron scattering and ab initio study, Inorg. Chem. 56, 378 (2017)

  66. [66]

    M. A. Dunstan, R. Mole, and C. Boskovic, Inelastic neutron scattering of lanthanoid complexes and single- molecule magnets, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 1090 (2019)

  67. [67]

    A. M. Atkin, M. Giansiracusa, S. Calvello, E. Rous- set, R. Gable, W. Phonsri, K. Murray, J. K. Howard, A. Soncini, R. Mole, and C. Boskovic, Inelastic neutron scattering measurement of the ground state tunneling gap in Tb and Ho analogues of a Dy field-induced single- molecule magnet, Inorg. Chem. 62, 1141 (2023)

  68. [68]

    Hennion, L

    M. Hennion, L. Pardi, I. Mirebeau, E. Suard, R. Sessoli, and A. Caneschi, Neutron study of mesoscopic magnetic clusters: Mn 12O12, Phys. Rev. B 56, 8819 (1997)

  69. [69]

    Garlatti, A

    E. Garlatti, A. Chiesa, T. Guidi, G. Amoretti, P. Santini, and S. Carretta, Unravelling the spin dynamics of molec- ular nanomagnets with four-dimensional inelastic neu- tron scattering, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 1106 (2019)

  70. [70]

    Sriram Shastry and B

    B. Sriram Shastry and B. Sutherland, Exact ground state of a quantum mechanical antiferromagnet, Physica B+C 108, 1069 (1981)

  71. [71]

    Kageyama, M

    H. Kageyama, M. Nishi, N. Aso, K. Onizuka, T. Yosi- hama, K. Nukui, K. Kodama, K. Kakurai, and Y. Ueda, Direct evidence for the localized single-triplet exci- tations and the dispersive multitriplet excitations in SrCu2(BO3)2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5876 (2000)

  72. [72]

    Kurita, D

    N. Kurita, D. Yamamoto, T. Kanesaka, N. Furukawa, 19 S. Ohira-Kawamura, K. Nakajima, and H. Tanaka, Lo- calized magnetic excitations in the fully frustrated dimer- ized magnet Ba 2CoSi2O6Cl2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 027206 (2019)

  73. [73]

    P. Park, E. A. Ghioldi, A. F. May, J. A. Kolopus, A. A. Podlesnyak, S. Calder, J. A. M. Paddison, A. E. Trumper, L. O. Manuel, C. D. Batista, M. B. Stone, G. B. Hal´ asz, and A. D. Christianson, Anomalous continuum scattering and higher-order van hove singularity in the strongly anisotropic S=1/2 triangular lattice antiferro- magnet, Nat. Commun. 15, 7264 (2024)

  74. [74]

    Fujihala, K

    M. Fujihala, K. Morita, R. Mole, S. Mitsuda, T. To- hyama, S.-i. Yano, D. Yu, S. Sota, T. Kuwai, A. Koda, H. Okabe, H. Lee, S. Itoh, T. Hawai, T. Masuda, H. Sagayama, A. Matsuo, K. Kindo, S. Ohira-Kawamura, and K. Nakajima, Gapless spin liquid in a square-kagome lattice antiferromagnet, Nat. Commun. 11, 3429 (2020)

  75. [75]

    Fechner, A

    M. Fechner, A. Sukhov, L. Chotorlishvili, C. Kenel, J. Be- rakdar, and N. A. Spaldin, Magnetophononics: Ultrafast spin control through the lattice, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 064401 (2018)

  76. [76]

    Giorgianni, B

    F. Giorgianni, B. Wehinger, S. Allenspach, N. Colonna, C. Vicario, P. Puphal, E. Pomjakushina, B. Normand, and Ch. R¨ uegg, Ultrafast frustration breaking and mag- netophononic driving of singlet excitations in a quantum magnet, Phys. Rev. B 107, 184440 (2023)

  77. [77]

    Trushin and A

    E. Trushin and A. G¨ orling, Avoiding spin contamination and spatial symmetry breaking by exact-exchange-only optimized-effective-potential methods within the sym- metrized Kohn–Sham framework, J. Chem. Phys. 159, 244109 (2023)

  78. [78]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, J. Sun, N. K. Nepal, and A. D. Kaplan, Interpretations of ground-state symme- try breaking and strong correlation in wavefunction and density functional theories, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 118, e2017850118 (2021)

  79. [79]

    Neese, Definition of corresponding orbitals and the diradical character in broken symmetry DFT calculations on spin coupled systems, J

    F. Neese, Definition of corresponding orbitals and the diradical character in broken symmetry DFT calculations on spin coupled systems, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 65, 781 (2004)

  80. [80]

    P. W. Anderson, More is different, Science 177, 393 (1972). 20 SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL S1. CRYSTAL GROWTH Deuterated copper acetate hydrate Cu 2(CD3COO) · 4 (D2O)2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c (no

Showing first 80 references.