Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science

As of 6 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 38 of 38 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2604.14047.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2604.14047 v1

Coverage vector

measured 38 of 38 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-05-10T11:42:56.004727Z

measured 38 of 38 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

38 of 38 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy31
unresolved7
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation be8478f8-d9bf-4e42-ad4b-9f000b317aa1 · outbound

This paper cites Throughout the paper, we usedemanding reviewas a descriptive shorthand for combinations of stronger criticism, higher comment quality, and greater revision cost.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Throughout the paper, we usedemanding reviewas a descriptive shorthand for combinations of stronger criticism, higher comment quality, and greater revision cost

Reference 1

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:27:19.555202Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 0fdf582e-63e1-44dd-a346-93e9c46d9c8b · outbound

This paper cites Bergstrom, Katy B¨ orner, James A.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Bergstrom, Katy B¨ orner, James A

Reference 2

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.440349Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation dedfdb3a-71bd-4efc-b626-bb7eb0b46836 · outbound

This paper cites The effectiveness of the peer review process: Inter- referee agreement and predictive validity of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science The effectiveness of the peer review process: Inter- referee agreement and predictive validity of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie

Reference 3

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.461576Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 4c77d6d6-65a1-4626-9ee2-fed695a73ee4 · outbound

This paper cites Diekman, and Elke U.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Diekman, and Elke U

Reference 4

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.443160Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation a2baa58d-4736-44e2-bfda-700e794d7aae · outbound

This paper cites Hanson, Pablo G´ omez Barreiro, Paolo Crosetto, and Dan Brockington.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Hanson, Pablo G´ omez Barreiro, Paolo Crosetto, and Dan Brockington

Reference 5

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.450572Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation d9eb802a-36e6-4648-bfa6-a6da64352426 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Unresolved cited work

Reference 6

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.454245Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 95c754c9-4fc4-4ddc-ab9f-40d95b867d9a · outbound

This paper cites Overburdening of peer reviewers: a multi-stakeholder perspective on causes and effects.Learned Publishing, 34(4):537–546.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Overburdening of peer reviewers: a multi-stakeholder perspective on causes and effects.Learned Publishing, 34(4):537–546

Reference 7

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.376180Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 8712e67a-cecf-4bff-bc04-0be21159975e · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Unresolved cited work

Reference 8

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.377541Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 33c364b8-5766-4cf5-b3d0-1cf67b4b88e3 · outbound

This paper cites Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: Ob- serving Goodhart’s Law in action.GigaScience, 8(6):giz053.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: Ob- serving Goodhart’s Law in action.GigaScience, 8(6):giz053

Reference 9

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.433942Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation ff892cf2-7895-48b1-85e0-1e6f5c0c8dfb · outbound

This paper cites MIT Press.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science MIT Press

Reference 10

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:27:19.557385Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation c0e5bb0d-1d2f-49ed-907a-a13d01aa9135 · outbound

This paper cites A reliability-generalization study of journal peer reviews: A multilevel meta-analysis of inter-rater reliability and its determinants.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science A reliability-generalization study of journal peer reviews: A multilevel meta-analysis of inter-rater reliability and its determinants

Reference 11

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:27:19.560869Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation ae65ce0b-478a-4697-bcbf-88322aa3b10f · outbound

This paper cites Heterogeneity of inter-rater relia- bilities of grant peer reviews and its determinants: a general estimating equations approach.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Heterogeneity of inter-rater relia- bilities of grant peer reviews and its determinants: a general estimating equations approach

Reference 12

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.421035Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation e7313f36-b502-475a-9a53-2eaf724b2668 · outbound

This paper cites Pier, Markus Brauer, Alexa Filut, Anna Kaatz, Joshua Raclaw, Mitchell J.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Pier, Markus Brauer, Alexa Filut, Anna Kaatz, Joshua Raclaw, Mitchell J

Reference 13

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.394416Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 6280588b-3349-49c5-a0e3-2bb10d1e4474 · outbound

This paper cites Lee, Cassidy R.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Lee, Cassidy R

Reference 14

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.327667Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 2d3f9a5c-76ac-4efa-a592-d8181331f178 · outbound

This paper cites Gender contributes to personal research funding success in the netherlands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40):12349– 12353.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Gender contributes to personal research funding success in the netherlands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40):12349– 12353

Reference 15

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.368887Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation fdf12f45-f210-4c25-97a5-0fed9dd087d3 · outbound

This paper cites Witteman, Michelle Hendricks, Sharon Straus, and Cara Tannenbaum.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Witteman, Michelle Hendricks, Sharon Straus, and Cara Tannenbaum

Reference 16

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.338783Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 855cdf85-1df5-4174-9d12-7031960f9b55 · outbound

This paper cites Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.PLoS One, 16(10):e0257919.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.PLoS One, 16(10):e0257919

Reference 17

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.457869Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation e18cfe9e-5032-485c-85fe-17504a1172f4 · outbound

This paper cites Collings, Jennifer Raymond, and Cassidy R.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Collings, Jennifer Raymond, and Cassidy R

Reference 18

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.331140Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation b2243ee8-3def-4e51-8490-63e95e87f8d8 · outbound

This paper cites Ginther, Walter T.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Ginther, Walter T

Reference 19

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.417636Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 0cc473ba-89a4-4a6e-a8ea-5d173b2960ac · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Unresolved cited work

Reference 20

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.437224Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 7191b546-977e-40e5-9587-c9a985beb068 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Unresolved cited work

Reference 21

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.315998Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 633f30d4-d5ce-4add-81eb-69ff38539bd7 · outbound

This paper cites Kern-Goldberger, Rachel James, Vincenzo Berghella, and Emily S.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Kern-Goldberger, Rachel James, Vincenzo Berghella, and Emily S

Reference 22

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.411333Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation a2b3f96b-fdde-4505-87cd-374997073ae0 · outbound

This paper cites Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators.Research Policy, 46(8):1416–1436.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators.Research Policy, 46(8):1416–1436

Reference 23

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.364231Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 67bdf3c0-2a95-4bee-bbdb-09059dc7f949 · outbound

This paper cites Boudreau, Eva C.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Boudreau, Eva C

Reference 24

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.367124Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 9639ebd0-a164-4197-98a2-364fd0aa732e · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Unresolved cited work

Reference 25

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.394070Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation fd5a03cd-e4ba-4c0a-a044-3c94d9c87797 · outbound

This paper cites On the very idea of pursuitworthiness.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 91:103–112.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science On the very idea of pursuitworthiness.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 91:103–112

Reference 26

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.407637Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 31d32d0c-0135-4daf-ac9d-1374e76a9bd7 · outbound

This paper cites Woods, and Johanna Brumberg.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Woods, and Johanna Brumberg

Reference 27

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.414628Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation df041752-abac-4750-a1c6-a1cd8743af45 · outbound

This paper cites The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals.Nature Communications, 10(1):322.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals.Nature Communications, 10(1):322

Reference 28

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.430934Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation b7fbd740-4626-4d2e-8ffb-ff8e9fe5b687 · outbound

This paper cites Meta-research: Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports.eLife, 9:e53249.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Meta-research: Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports.eLife, 9:e53249

Reference 29

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.390480Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 20893b22-0465-4907-9eb6-a16fde68e7b6 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Unresolved cited work

Reference 30

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.403948Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation caf2b0a2-184f-417a-8a30-85333f9ea8e0 · outbound

This paper cites Peer review analyze: A novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews.PLOS ONE, 17(1):e0259238.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Peer review analyze: A novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews.PLOS ONE, 17(1):e0259238

Reference 31

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.446700Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation a39d6cf6-6661-4ad0-a0af-b776cee7f8af · outbound

This paper cites AI-assisted peer review.Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1):1–11.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science AI-assisted peer review.Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1):1–11

Reference 32

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.400997Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation bcf5c130-e57e-4467-b23e-763bdb3dd312 · outbound

This paper cites Kummerfeld, Anne Lauscher, Kevin Leyton-Brown, Sheng Lu, Mausam, Margot Mieskes, Aur´ elie N´ ev´ eol, Danish Pruthi, Lizhen Qu, Roy Schwartz, 19 Noah A.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Kummerfeld, Anne Lauscher, Kevin Leyton-Brown, Sheng Lu, Mausam, Margot Mieskes, Aur´ elie N´ ev´ eol, Danish Pruthi, Lizhen Qu, Roy Schwartz, 19 Noah A

Reference 33

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.428231Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation b302cb1c-5092-4af5-817d-c1a918094870 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Unresolved cited work

Reference 34

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.397190Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 683235c2-4fb5-4c61-a45f-bfbbdd8ffe82 · outbound

This paper cites ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(30):e2305016120.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(30):e2305016120

Reference 35

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.373964Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 754f7375-a62d-4db7-942b-bb8657ebcffc · outbound

This paper cites Can large language models transform computational social science?Computational Linguistics, 50(1):237–291.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Can large language models transform computational social science?Computational Linguistics, 50(1):237–291

Reference 36

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.424784Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation b98b948d-e0e9-4dfa-b942-63af621549d7 · outbound

This paper cites Best practices for text annotation with large language models.Sociologica, 18(2):67–85.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science Best practices for text annotation with large language models.Sociologica, 18(2):67–85

Reference 37

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.370053Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Observation 0706661a-9808-4c73-af4c-ed65ea7711e6 · outbound

This paper cites this does not address my concern.

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science this does not address my concern

Reference 38

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-19T13:23:07.465991Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-06T06:34:29.942622+00:00.

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.