arxiv: 2604.14236 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · ✦ hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

Search for heavy resonances decaying into four-lepton final states via light bosons in proton-proton collisions at sqrt{s} = 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 13:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex

keywords four-lepton resonancelight bosonsCMS experiment13 TeVupper limitsmerged dileptonsheavy resonancenull result

0 comments

The pith

No significant excess is observed in a search for heavy resonances decaying to four leptons via light bosons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The CMS experiment searched proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV for a resonance heavier than 250 GeV that decays into four leptons through two intermediate light bosons. New methods were introduced to reconstruct collimated lepton pairs from light bosons as single merged objects, increasing reach into low-mass regions. Using 138 fb inverse of integrated luminosity, the observed events match background expectations with no significant excess. This result sets upper limits on the resonance production cross section and extends coverage to previously unexplored dilepton masses from 0.4 to 15 GeV.

Core claim

A search for a resonance heavier than 250 GeV decaying into four leptons via two intermediate bosons is presented. The search uses proton-proton collision data at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV collected by the CMS experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb^{-1}. Novel techniques are used to enhance the sensitivity to a collimated pair of dileptons reconstructed as a single merged object, resulting from the decay of an intermediate light boson. No significant excess of data over the background predictions is observed. Upper limits are set on the production cross section for a four-lepton resonance, including the previously unexplored phase space at the LHC with a dilepton mass of 0.4-

What carries the argument

Novel techniques for reconstructing collimated dileptons as a single merged object to improve sensitivity to light intermediate bosons in four-lepton decays.

If this is right

Upper limits are set on the production cross section of a four-lepton resonance heavier than 250 GeV.
The limits cover new parameter space for intermediate boson masses corresponding to dilepton masses of 0.4-15 GeV.
Models with light bosons mediating decays into leptons face additional constraints from the absence of signal.
The merged-object reconstruction approach enables exploration of low-mass intermediate states at the LHC.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

These limits can be recast to constrain specific models such as those with dark photons or other light mediators.
Combining the merged-lepton technique with other final states could broaden searches for light new particles.
Higher-luminosity LHC data would tighten the cross-section bounds using the same analysis framework.

Load-bearing premise

The novel techniques for identifying collimated dileptons as single merged objects correctly capture signal efficiency without introducing unaccounted biases, and the background predictions accurately model the data in the selected regions.

What would settle it

A statistically significant excess of four-lepton events over background predictions in the signal regions would indicate a resonance and contradict the no-excess result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14236 by CMS Collaboration.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: The observed and predicted m4ℓ (left and center) and mT (right) distributions after the likelihood fit with the background-only hypothesis. The lower panel shows the ratio of the number of observed events to the predicted background. The shaded band represents the post-fit background uncertainty, incorporating both systematic and statistical sources. The red histogram shows a simulated signal mass spectrum… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The observed limit on the product of the cross section and branching fraction for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: The observed limit on the product of the cross section and branching fraction for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

A search for a resonance heavier than 250 GeV decaying into four leptons via two intermediate bosons is presented. The search uses proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV collected by the CMS experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. Novel techniques are used to enhance the sensitivity to a collimated pair of dileptons reconstructed as a single merged object, resulting from the decay of an intermediate light boson. No significant excess of data over the background predictions is observed. Upper limits are set on the production cross section for a four-lepton resonance, including the previously unexplored phase space at the LHC with a dilepton mass of 0.4$-$15 GeV.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

CMS sets limits on four-lepton resonances down to 0.4 GeV dilepton mass using merged-object reconstruction, but the efficiency modeling for those objects is the part that needs scrutiny.

read the letter

This is a standard CMS null-result search for a heavy resonance above 250 GeV decaying to four leptons through two light bosons. The real addition is the extension into the 0.4-15 GeV dilepton mass window, which had not been probed at the LHC in this final state, plus the use of new reconstruction methods to treat very collimated dilepton pairs as single merged objects. They see no excess in 138 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV data and set cross-section limits that cover the new range. That fills a concrete gap in phase space and shows the collaboration is thinking about how to handle boosted light states. The analysis follows the usual CMS template for limit setting, which is reliable when the details are filled in. The soft spot is exactly what the stress-test note flags: signal efficiency for the merged objects is taken from Monte Carlo, and at opening angles much smaller than detector resolution the tracking, isolation, and clustering can easily have data-MC mismatches that scale the expected signal yield and therefore the limits. The abstract gives no numbers on how they validated those efficiencies or on background modeling and systematics, so the strength of the result hinges on whether the full paper shows data-driven cross-checks or control regions that close that loop. If those checks are there and look solid, the limits are usable; if not, the new phase space coverage is still interesting but the quantitative bounds need caution. This paper is for experimentalists working on BSM dilepton or four-lepton searches and for people developing reconstruction for collimated objects. A reader in those niches will get value from the new mass coverage and the technique description. It deserves peer review because it is a real experimental result from a major collaboration that actually explores new territory, even if the central claim is a null result.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a search for heavy resonances with mass above 250 GeV decaying to four leptons via two light intermediate bosons, using 138 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV proton-proton collision data collected by the CMS experiment. Novel techniques are employed to reconstruct collimated dilepton pairs as single merged objects. No significant excess over background predictions is observed, and upper limits are set on the resonance production cross section, including the previously unexplored dilepton mass range of 0.4-15 GeV.

Significance. If the result holds, the work is significant for extending LHC searches for light bosons into a new low-mass phase space that was previously inaccessible due to collimation effects. The novel merged-object reconstruction is a clear strength that enables this extension. Credit is given for the direct experimental approach, use of a large dataset, and standard limit-setting procedure with no circularity in the derivation.

major comments (2)

The signal efficiency for collimated dileptons reconstructed as merged objects is derived exclusively from Monte Carlo simulation. At the small opening angles corresponding to the 0.4-15 GeV dilepton mass range, tracking, isolation, and calorimeter clustering are sensitive to potential data-MC mismodeling; without a dedicated data-driven validation or additional systematic uncertainty assessment in this regime, the extracted cross-section limits cannot be fully substantiated.
Background estimation methods, including any data-driven techniques and their validation in the selected signal regions, are not described with sufficient detail. This is load-bearing for the central claim of no significant excess and the subsequent limit setting, as unaccounted discrepancies would directly affect the interpretation of the null result.

minor comments (1)

Figure captions and axis labels should be reviewed for clarity and completeness to ensure readers can interpret the limit plots and efficiency curves without ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional details and validations as outlined.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The signal efficiency for collimated dileptons reconstructed as merged objects is derived exclusively from Monte Carlo simulation. At the small opening angles corresponding to the 0.4-15 GeV dilepton mass range, tracking, isolation, and calorimeter clustering are sensitive to potential data-MC mismodeling; without a dedicated data-driven validation or additional systematic uncertainty assessment in this regime, the extracted cross-section limits cannot be fully substantiated.

Authors: We agree that dedicated validation is important in this regime. In the revised manuscript, we will add a new subsection on data-MC comparisons using control regions enriched in collimated dilepton pairs (e.g., from Z boson decays with additional radiation and low-mass resonance samples). We will also introduce and quantify additional systematic uncertainties for merged-object reconstruction efficiency, covering variations in tracking, isolation, and clustering at small opening angles. These additions will directly address the concern and support the robustness of the efficiency and limits. revision: yes
Referee: Background estimation methods, including any data-driven techniques and their validation in the selected signal regions, are not described with sufficient detail. This is load-bearing for the central claim of no significant excess and the subsequent limit setting, as unaccounted discrepancies would directly affect the interpretation of the null result.

Authors: We acknowledge that the background methods require expanded description. The revised manuscript will include a dedicated section detailing the background estimation, specifying the data-driven components for reducible backgrounds (e.g., fake-lepton estimation via sideband methods) and their validation in orthogonal control regions and signal-region sidebands. We will add quantitative agreement metrics and validation plots to demonstrate the reliability of the background prediction and support the no-excess observation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct experimental search with data comparison

full rationale

This is a standard LHC experimental search paper that reports observed event counts in four-lepton final states, compares them to background predictions (data-driven or MC-based), and sets frequentist upper limits on signal cross sections when no excess is seen. No derivation chain exists that reduces a claimed prediction or first-principles result to an input by construction; the novel merged-dilepton identification is a reconstruction technique whose efficiency is evaluated on simulation and validated against control regions, but the final limits are not forced by any self-definition or self-citation of the result itself. The analysis is self-contained against external data benchmarks and does not invoke uniqueness theorems or ansatze from prior author work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an experimental particle-physics search paper. No new theoretical axioms, free parameters, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract; the analysis relies on established Standard Model background modeling and CMS detector simulation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5425 in / 1230 out tokens · 38305 ms · 2026-05-10T13:21:28.198572+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

[1]

Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models

G. C. Branco et al., “Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models”,Phys. Rept.516(2012) 1,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002,arXiv:1106.0034

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002 2012
[2]

Illuminating dark photons with high-energy colliders

D. Curtin, R. Essig, S. Gori, and J. Shelton, “Illuminating dark photons with high-energy colliders”,JHEP02(2015) 157,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)157, arXiv:1412.0018

work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2015)157 2015
[3]

Four-lepton resonance at the Large Hadron Collider

V . Barger and H.-S. Lee, “Four-lepton resonance at the Large Hadron Collider”,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 055030,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.055030,arXiv:1111.0633

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.055030 2012
[4]

Search for low-mass dilepton resonances in Higgs boson decays to four-lepton final states in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Search for low-mass dilepton resonances in Higgs boson decays to four-lepton final states in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 290,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10127-0,arXiv:2111.01299

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10127-0 2022
[5]

Search for Higgs bosons decaying into new spin-0 or spin-1 particles in four-lepton final states with the ATLAS detector with 139 fb−1 of pp collision data at√s=13 TeV

ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for Higgs bosons decaying into new spin-0 or spin-1 particles in four-lepton final states with the ATLAS detector with 139 fb−1 of pp collision data at√s=13 TeV”,JHEP03(2022) 41,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2022)041, arXiv:2110.13673

work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2022)041 2022
[6]

Search for a new scalar resonance decaying to a pair of Z bosons in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Search for a new scalar resonance decaying to a pair of Z bosons in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP06(2018) 127, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2018)127,arXiv:1804.01939. [Erratum: doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2019)128]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2018)127 2018
[7]

ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for heavy resonances decaying into a pair of Z bosons in theℓ +ℓ−ℓ′+ℓ′− andℓ +ℓ−ν ¯νfinal states using 139 fb −1 of proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 332, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09013-y,arXiv:2009.14791. References 9

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09013-y 2021
[8]

Search for a new scalar decaying into new spin-1 bosons in four-lepton final states with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for a new scalar decaying into new spin-1 bosons in four-lepton final states with the ATLAS detector”,Phys. Lett. B865(2025) 139472, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139472,arXiv:2410.16781

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139472 2025
[9]

The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST3(2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/s08004 2008
[10]

Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3

CMS Collaboration, “Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3”, JINST19(2024) P05064,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/P05064

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/p05064 2024
[11]

The CMS trigger system

CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”,JINST12(2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020,arXiv:1609.02366

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/p01020 2017
[12]

Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST15(2020) P10017, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017,arXiv:2006.10165

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/p10017 2020
[13]

Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2

CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2”, JINST19(2024) P11021,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/P11021, arXiv:2410.17038

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/p11021 2024
[14]

Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

CMS Collaboration, “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST16(2021) P05014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05014,arXiv:2012.06888

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/p05014 2021
[15]

Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P06015, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015,arXiv:1804.04528

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/p06015 2018
[16]

Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”,JINST9(2014) P10009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009,arXiv:1405.6569

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/p10009 2014
[17]

Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”,JINST12(2017) P10003,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/p10003 2017
[18]

Performance of reconstruction and identification ofτleptons decaying to hadrons andν τ in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Performance of reconstruction and identification ofτleptons decaying to hadrons andν τ in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P10005, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/10/P10005,arXiv:1809.02816

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/10/p10005 2018
[19]

Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV”,JINST12(2017) P02014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014,arXiv:1607.03663

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/p02014 2017
[20]

Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using the CMS detector

CMS Collaboration, “Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using the CMS detector”,JINST14(2019) P07004,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/P07004,arXiv:1903.06078

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/p07004 2019
[21]

Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data

CMS Collaboration, “Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data”,JINST15(2020) P09018, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/P09018,arXiv:2003.00503

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/p09018 2020
[22]

Sj¨ ostrand, S

T. Sj ¨ostrand et al., “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”,Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024,arXiv:1410.3012. 10

work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024 2015
[23]

Alwall, R

J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”,JHEP07 (2014) 79,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079,arXiv:1405.0301

work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)079 2014
[24]

A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

P . Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms”,JHEP11(2004) 040,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040 2004
[25]

Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

S. Frixione, P . Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method”,JHEP11(2007) 070, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070,arXiv:0709.2092

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070 2007
[26]

A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX”,JHEP06(2010) 043, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043,arXiv:1002.2581

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1007/jhep06(2010)043 2010
[27]

W+W−, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG-BOX-V2

P . Nason and G. Zanderighi, “W+W−,WZandZZproduction in the POWHEG-BOX-V2”,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 2702, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2702-5,arXiv:1311.1365

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2702-5 2014
[28]

Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements

CMS Collaboration, “Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS Pythia8 tunes from underlying-event measurements”,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 4, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4,arXiv:1903.12179

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4 2020
[29]

Parton distributions from high-precision collider data

R. D. Ball et al., “Parton distributions from high-precision collider data”,Eur. Phys. J. C 77(2017) 663,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5,arXiv:1706.00428

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5 2017
[30]

GEANT4 — a simulation toolkit

GEANT4 Collaboration, “GEANT4—a simulation toolkit”,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 2003
[31]

Search for leptophobic Z ′ bosons decaying into four-lepton final states in proton-proton collisions at √s=8 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Search for leptophobic Z ′ bosons decaying into four-lepton final states in proton-proton collisions at √s=8 TeV”,Phys. Lett. B773(2017) 563, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.08.069,arXiv:1701.01345

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.08.069 2017
[32]

Highly boosted dielectron identification in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Highly boosted dielectron identification in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-EGM-24-002, 2025

2025
[33]

doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/15/02/P02027

CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the reconstruction and identification of high-momentum muons in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST15(2020) P02027,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/02/P02027,arXiv:1912.03516

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/02/p02027 2020
[34]

Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP11(2017) 47, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2017)047,arXiv:1706.09936

work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2017)047 2017
[35]

Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS

CMS Collaboration, “Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS”,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 800, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2,arXiv:2104.01927

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2 2015
[36]

CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004, 2018

2017
[37]

CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002, 2019. 11

2018
[38]

Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at√s=13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP07(2018) 161,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)161,arXiv:1802.02613

work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2018)161 2018
[39]

Confidence Level Computation for Combining Searches with Small Statistics

T. Junk, “Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A434(1999) 435,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00498-2

work page Pith review doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(99)00498-2 1999
[40]

The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool:COMBINE

CMS Collaboration, “The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: Combine”, Comput. Softw. Big Sci.8(2024) 19,doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4, arXiv:2404.06614

work page doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4 2024
[41]

The RooFit toolkit for data modeling

W. Verkerke and D. Kirkby, “The ROOFITtoolkit for data modeling”, inProc. 13th Int. Conf. on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2003). 2003. arXiv:physics/0306116

work page Pith review arXiv 2003
[42]

The ROOSTATSproject

L. Moneta et al., “The ROOSTATSproject”, inProc. 13th Int. Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis T echniques in Physics Research (ACAT 2010). 2010. arXiv:1009.1003.doi:10.22323/1.093.0057

work page doi:10.22323/1.093.0057 2010
[43]

Trial factors for the look elsewhere effect in high energy physics

E. Gross and O. Vitells, “Trial factors for the look elsewhere effect in high energy physics”,Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 525,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1470-8, arXiv:1005.1891

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1470-8 2010
[44]

A Upper limits for exclusive Y→ee and Y→µµdecay modes The lepton universality between Y→ee and Y→µµmay not be guaranteed in some models

HEPData record for this analysis, 2025.doi:10.17182/hepdata.159894. A Upper limits for exclusive Y→ee and Y→µµdecay modes The lepton universality between Y→ee and Y→µµmay not be guaranteed in some models. The observed upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction with exclusive Y→ee and Y→µµdecays are also examined and shown in Fig. 3. For th...

work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.159894 2025