pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14245 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn

Investigation of Mist and Air Film Cooling in a Two-Phase Rotating Detonation Combustor with Liquid Kerosene

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn
keywords rotating detonation combustorfilm coolingkerosene mistthermal protectiontwo-phase flownumerical simulationdetonation wave
0
0 comments X

The pith

Kerosene mist cooling creates a more persistent protective layer than air film cooling in rotating detonation combustors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates using kerosene droplet mist for cooling the walls of a rotating detonation combustor fueled by liquid kerosene. Through numerical simulations validated on flat-plate data, it shows that mist cooling outperforms conventional air film cooling by forming a stable near-wall layer that uses evaporation for heat removal and resists disruption by the passing detonation waves. A hybrid mist and air approach further enhances performance by speeding up wall temperature recovery after each wave. The study finds that droplet size matters for balancing film continuity and evaporation, and that partial burning of the coolant droplets does not erase the net cooling gain. These results point to practical advantages for thermal management in such high-temperature engines.

Core claim

Numerical simulations demonstrate that injecting kerosene droplets as mist through wall film holes in a rotating detonation combustor produces a durable cooling film. This film provides superior heat removal via phase change and shows greater resistance to separation caused by the rotating detonation wave compared to air film cooling. Intermediate droplet sizes optimize the trade-off between rapid evaporation and sustained coverage. Combining mist with air injection improves overall cooling efficiency and accelerates post-detonation wall cooling with limited disruption to the main flow. Although some kerosene participates in combustion, the cooling benefits outweigh this effect.

What carries the argument

Kerosene mist film cooling, where wall-injected droplets evaporate to form a phase-changing protective boundary layer near the combustor wall.

If this is right

  • Air film cooling has a limited operating range before excessive injection destabilizes the film due to detonation wave interactions.
  • Droplet size in mist cooling primarily influences downstream cooling effectiveness, with intermediate sizes best balancing evaporation and continuity.
  • The combined mist/air scheme boosts cooling efficiency and shortens recovery time for wall temperatures after detonation passage.
  • Partial combustion of injected kerosene droplets occurs but does not cancel out the overall cooling advantages.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This mist cooling approach could support higher detonation frequencies or longer operating times in RDCs by managing wall heat loads more effectively.
  • The technique might transfer to other high-heat propulsion systems such as scramjets where film stability is difficult to maintain.
  • Optimizing injection locations and droplet sizes could further reduce any unwanted effects on the main combustor flow.

Load-bearing premise

The turbulence, droplet evaporation, and combustion models, which were checked only against flat-plate experiments, correctly simulate the unsteady interactions of the rotating detonation wave with the injected droplets and the developing wall film in the full combustor.

What would settle it

Wall temperature and heat transfer measurements taken inside an operating rotating detonation combustor with kerosene mist injection compared directly to air-only cases under matched conditions.

read the original abstract

We present a numerical investigation of kerosene droplet mist film cooling for the thermal protection of the rotating detonation combustor (RDC) and compare its performance with conventional air film cooling and combined mist/air cooling scheme. In the study, the cooling behavior of kerosene droplets injected through wall film holes is numerically examined and compared with air film cooling and a combined mist/air cooling strategy, building on a benchmark validation against flat-plate experimental data. The results show that air film cooling exhibits an optimal operating range, beyond which excessive injection degrades film stability due to strong interaction with the rotating detonation wave. In contrast, kerosene-based mist cooling forms a more persistent near-wall cooling layer, providing enhanced heat removal through phase change and exhibiting improved resistance to film separation. In mist cooling, the droplet size primarily affects the immediate downstream cooling performance, with intermediate-sized droplets offering the improved balance between evaporation rate and film continuity. A combined mist/air cooling scheme can further improve cooling efficiency and accelerate wall temperature recovery after detonation wave passage while maintaining moderate impacts on the mainstream flow. Additionally, although kerosene droplets partially participate in combustion under film hole injection, the associated thermal load does not offset the overall cooling benefit. These findings demonstrate the feasibility and advantages of kerosene-based cooling schemes for RDC thermal management.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a numerical CFD investigation of kerosene droplet mist film cooling in a two-phase rotating detonation combustor (RDC), comparing its performance to conventional air film cooling and a combined mist/air scheme. Building on flat-plate validation, it claims that kerosene mist forms a more persistent near-wall cooling layer with enhanced heat removal via phase change and greater resistance to separation under detonation wave passage; intermediate droplet sizes balance evaporation and film continuity; the combined scheme further improves efficiency and post-detonation recovery with moderate mainstream impact; and partial kerosene combustion does not negate the cooling benefit.

Significance. If the numerical predictions hold under the unsteady RDC conditions, the work would offer a concrete path toward improved thermal management in rotating detonation engines, where extreme heat loads limit durability. The identification of mist cooling's advantages in film persistence and recovery time, plus the feasibility of using the fuel itself for cooling, could influence injector and wall design in practical RDC systems.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / Numerical Methods] Abstract and Numerical Methods: The central claims (persistent near-wall layer, improved resistance to film separation, faster post-detonation recovery) rest on the turbulence, droplet evaporation, and combustion sub-models accurately predicting unsteady droplet trajectories and film stability under periodic high-amplitude pressure pulses. These models are benchmarked only against steady flat-plate experiments; no mesh-convergence checks, turbulence-model sensitivity studies, or RDC-specific validation cases are reported. This is load-bearing for the extrapolation to the full combustor geometry.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that 'droplet size primarily affects the immediate downstream cooling performance' would benefit from explicit quantification of the size range and distribution employed in the simulations.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim of 'moderate impacts on the mainstream flow' for the combined scheme lacks reference to specific metrics (e.g., total pressure loss or velocity deficit) that would allow direct comparison with the single-scheme cases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive feedback on our numerical investigation of kerosene mist film cooling in a rotating detonation combustor. The comments highlight important aspects of model validation that we have addressed through revisions and additional analysis. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract and Numerical Methods: The central claims (persistent near-wall layer, improved resistance to film separation, faster post-detonation recovery) rest on the turbulence, droplet evaporation, and combustion sub-models accurately predicting unsteady droplet trajectories and film stability under periodic high-amplitude pressure pulses. These models are benchmarked only against steady flat-plate experiments; no mesh-convergence checks, turbulence-model sensitivity studies, or RDC-specific validation cases are reported. This is load-bearing for the extrapolation to the full combustor geometry.

    Authors: We agree that the validation strategy relies primarily on steady flat-plate experiments, which is standard for film-cooling studies but limits direct assessment of unsteady RDC effects. To strengthen the manuscript, we have added a dedicated mesh-convergence study in the revised Numerical Methods section, confirming that wall temperature, film thickness, and evaporation rates are insensitive to further grid refinement beyond the reported resolution. We have also included a turbulence-model sensitivity analysis comparing the baseline k-epsilon model with an alternative SST k-omega formulation, showing that the relative performance trends between mist, air, and combined cooling remain consistent. Regarding RDC-specific validation, we have expanded the discussion to cite supporting literature on droplet trajectories and evaporation under high-amplitude pressure oscillations, arguing that the sub-models capture the dominant physics for the comparative claims made. These additions directly support the extrapolation while acknowledging the steady-to-unsteady step. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct experimental data for kerosene mist film cooling under full rotating detonation conditions, which does not currently exist in the literature and would require new dedicated experiments beyond the scope of this numerical study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; forward simulation with external validation

full rationale

The paper performs a forward CFD simulation study of cooling schemes in an RDC geometry. Governing equations and sub-models (turbulence, droplet evaporation, combustion) are applied after validation against independent flat-plate experiments; results on film persistence, separation resistance, and post-detonation recovery are direct outputs of those simulations rather than quantities fitted or defined from the RDC data itself. No equations reduce to their own inputs by construction, no predictions are statistically forced from fitted parameters, and no self-citation chains or uniqueness theorems are invoked as load-bearing premises. The derivation from the two-phase flow model to the reported performance comparisons is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The investigation relies on standard CFD sub-models for multiphase flow, turbulence, evaporation, and combustion; no new physical constants, entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced beyond those implicit in any RANS or LES simulation of reacting sprays.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5533 in / 1187 out tokens · 59749 ms · 2026-05-10T12:46:46.635462+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Raman, S

    V . Raman, S. Prakash, M. Gamba, Nonidealities in rotating detonation engines, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 55 (2023) 639-674

  2. [2]

    Q. Xie, H. Wen, W. Li, Z. Ji, B. Wang, P. Wolanski, Analysis of operating diagram for H2/Air rotating detonation combustors under lean fuel condition, Energy 151 (2018) 408-419

  3. [3]

    Zhang, H

    Z. Zhang, H. Xu, J. Guo, X. Ni, Z. He, Z. Duan, Q. Zheng, C. Weng, The oretical investigation on the energy conversion efficiency and performance of continuous rotating detonation ramjet engine with different types of fuels under various flight Mach numbers, Aerospace Science and Technology 163 (2025) 110336

  4. [4]

    J.Z. Ma, M.Y . Luan, Z.J. Xia, J.P. Wang, S.J. Zhang, S.B. Yao, B. Wang, Recent progress, development trends, and consideration of continuous detonation engines, AIAA Journal 58 (2020) 4976-5035

  5. [5]

    Huang, J

    S.Y . Huang, J. Zhou, S.J. Liu, H.Y . Peng, X.Q. Yuan, Continuous rotating detonation engine fueled by ammonia, Energy 252 (2022) 123911

  6. [6]

    Y . Zhu, S. Zhang, H. Chen, Y . Wu, Liquid fuels in rotating detonation engines: Advances and challenges, Physics of Fluids 36 (2024) 121305

  7. [7]

    T. Sato, K. Matsuoka, N. Itouyama, M. Yasui, K. Matsuyama, Y . Ide, K. Nakata, Y . Suzuki, R. Ishibashi, S. Suzuki, J. Kasahara, A. Kawasaki, H. Hirashima, D. Nakata, H. Eguchi, T. Takano, M. Uchiumi, T. Himeno, Y . Yahata, A. Matsuo, I. Funaki, H. Habu, S. Arakawa, J. Masuda, K. Kawahara, T. Usuki, K. Maehara, M. Shida, T. Nakao, K. Yamada, Space Flight ...

  8. [8]

    Wiggins, E

    R. Wiggins, E. Gutmark, Dynamics of Detonation Wave –Core Combustion Interaction in a Flow-Through Rotating Detonation Combustor, AIAA Journal 64 (2026) 2065-2087

  9. [9]

    Z. Ren, J. Lu, W.G. Dettmer, Effects of cryogenic temperature on propagation of hydrogen-air rotating detonation waves, Fuel 402 (2025) 135979

  10. [10]

    Ladein de, H

    F. Ladein de, H. Oh, S. Jacobs, Supersonic combustion heat flux in a rotating detonation engine, Acta Astronautica 203 (2023) 226-245

  11. [11]

    Lim, S.D

    D. Lim, S.D. Heister, J. Humble, A.J. Harroun, Experimental investigation of wall heat flux in a rotating detonation rocket engine, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 58 (2021) 1444-1452

  12. [12]

    Theuerkauf, F.R

    S.W. Theuerkauf, F.R. Schauer, R. Anthony, J.L. Hoke, Experimental characterization of high-frequency heat flux in a rotating detonation engine, 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2015

  13. [13]

    Y . Shi, Y . Zhang, X. Jin, H. Wen, B. Wang, Parameter influence and calculation model of wall heat flux in kerosene two phase rotating detonation combustor, Combustion and Flame 273 (2025) 113924

  14. [14]

    A. Roy, P. Strakey, T. Sidwell, D.H. Ferguson, Unsteady heat transfer analysis to predict combustor wall temperature in rotating detonation engine, 51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2015

  15. [15]

    S. Zhou, H. Ma, C. Liu, C. Zhou, D. Liu, Experimental investigation on the temperature and heat -transfer characteristics of rotating -detonation-combustor outer wall, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 43 (2018) 21079-21089

  16. [16]

    Y . Qiu, Y . Wu, Y . Huang, Q. Li, C. Weng, Heat transfer characteristics of H2/air rotating detonation combustor, Physics of Fluids 36 (2024) 016131

  17. [17]

    Braun, J

    J. Braun, J. Sousa, G. Paniagua, Numerical assessment of the convective heat transfer in rotating detonation combustors using a reduced -order model, Applied Sciences 8 (2018) 893

  18. [18]

    Hernandez-McCloskey, T.W

    J. Hernandez-McCloskey, T.W. Teasley, D.M. Petty, S.A. Reutlinger, D.I. Pineda, Calorimeter Heat Flux Trends in NASA ’s Subscale Rotating Detonation Rocket Engine, AIAA SCITECH 2025 Forum, 2025

  19. [19]

    S. Lu, Q. Zhu, J. Gong, H. Chen, H. Ying, Experimental study on transpiration cooling with phase change in rotating detonation engine, Applied Thermal Engineering 258 (2024) 124633

  20. [20]

    K. Goto, K. Ota, A. Kawasaki, N. Itouy ama, H. Watanabe, K. Matsuoka, J. Kasahara, A. Matsuo, I. Funaki, H. Kawashima, Cylindrical rotating detonation engine with propellant injection cooling, Journal of Propulsion and Power 38 (2022) 410-420

  21. [21]

    Glaubitz, T.C

    P.H. Glaubitz, T.C. Pritschau, J.J. Betancourt , E. Gutmark, Watercooled hollow rotating detonation combustor, AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, 2024

  22. [22]

    Braun, F

    J. Braun, F. Heston Lynch, A.S. Bavkar, V . Athmanathan, W. Andress, G. Paniagua, Design, Analysis, and Test of a Cooled Rotating Detonation Combustor throu gh axially injected stepped cooling slots, AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, 2024. 25

  23. [23]

    Zhang, S

    J. Zhang, S. Zhang, C. Wang, X. Tan, Recent advances in film cooling enhancement: A review, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 33 (2020) 1119-1136

  24. [24]

    Goldstein, Film Coolin g, in: J.P

    R.J. Goldstein, Film Coolin g, in: J.P. Abraham, J.M. Gorman, W.J. Minkowycz (Eds.), Advances in Heat Transfer1971, pp. 321-379

  25. [25]

    Z. Tao, X. Wang, G. Xie, H. Li, Z. Zhou, Effects of structural parameters of laidback fan-shaped hole on film cooling effectiveness on convex surface, Applied Thermal Engineering 236 (2024) 121636

  26. [26]

    Y . Luo, Z. Zhou, H. Li, L. Meng, G. Xie, A comprehensive comparison of film cooling characteristics of shaped holes on the leading edge of rotating blade, Applied Thermal Engineering 257 (2024) 124484

  27. [27]

    Y . Chen, R. Wan, Z. Ke, Comparative study of film cooling performance on curved walls with various hole configurations and blowing ratios, Applied Thermal Engineering 238 (2024) 122195

  28. [28]

    B. Li, C. Liu, L. Ye, T. Zhou, F. Zhang, Evaluation of film cooling effect in multi- row hole configurations on turbine blade leading edge, Energy 309 (2024) 132908

  29. [29]

    Huang, X

    W. Huang, X. Mei, Z. Fan, W. Wang, G. Jiang, J. Zhang, Y . Wang, Adaptive positioning technology of film cooling holes in hollow turbine blades, Aer ospace Science and Technology 145 (2024) 108878

  30. [30]

    J. Hu, Y . Zhang, J. Zhang, X. Kong, M. Zhu, J. Zhu, Numerical investigation of flow and heat transfer on turbine guide vane leading edge slot film cooling, Energy 309 (2024) 133116

  31. [31]

    S. Wang, W. Zeng, B. Sun, Q. Xu, Q. Du, J. Zhu, Application and performance study of low-stress film cooling holes on the guide vane, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 256 (2026) 128045

  32. [32]

    J. Yu, S. Yao, J. Li, Y . Huang, C. Guo, W. Zhang, Effects of inlet and secondary flow conditions on the flow field of rotating detonation engines with film cooling, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 48 (2023) 9082-9094

  33. [33]

    J. Yu, S. Yao, J. Li, J. Li, Y . Lei, R. Wang, W. Zhang, Experimental investigation of the hydrogen-air rotating detonation engine with cat -ear-shaped film cooling holes, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 89 (2024) 1454-1465

  34. [34]

    J. Tian, S. Zhang, X. Tan, F. Zhu, Z. Fan, J. Li, W. Hao, Numerical investigation of annular slit film cooli ng for thermal protection in rotating detonation combustors, Aerospace Science and Technology 168 (2026)

  35. [35]

    J. Tian, Y . Wang, J. Zhang, X. Tan, Numerical investigation on flow and film cooling characteristics of coolant injection in rotating detonation combustor, Aerospace Science and Technology 122 (2022) 107379

  36. [36]

    Ramanagar Sridhara, A

    S. Ramanagar Sridhara, A. Andreini, M.D. Polanka, M.D. Bohon, The impact of film cooling on the heat release within a rotating detonation combustor, Applications in Energy and Combustion Science 20 (2024) 100300

  37. [37]

    R. Li, J. Xu, H. Lv, D. Lv, J. Song, Numerical investigations of the nozzle performance for a rocket -based rotating detonation engine with film cooling, Aerospace Science and Technology 136 (2023) 108221

  38. [38]

    Y . Zhou, S. Yao, J. Yu, W. Qian, P. Wang, W. Zhang, Endwall and leading -edge film cooling of turbine blades in a hydrogen -fueled rotating detonation 26 combustor–turbine coupled system, Energy 335 (2025) 138307

  39. [39]

    Y . Liu, T. Zhao, C. Wen, F. Guo, J. Zhu, Characteristics analysis for turbine film cooling under rotating detonation combustion, Applied Thermal Engineering 269 (2025) 126054

  40. [40]

    Shine, S.S

    S.R. Shine, S.S. Nidhi, Review on film cooling of liquid rocket engines, Propulsion and Power Research 7 (2018) 1-18. [41] C. Kirchberger, G. Schlieben, A. Hupfer, H.-P. Kau, S. Soller, P. Martin. Investigation on Film Cooling in a Kerosene/GOX Combustion Chamber. In: editor^editors. 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit; 2009. p

  41. [41]

    Schlieben, C.U

    G. Schlieben, C.U. Kirchb erger, O.J. Haidn, C. Höglauer, B. Kniesner, O. Knab, Experimental and Numerical Film Cooling Investigations in a GOX/ Kerosene Rocket Combustion Chamber, 50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2014

  42. [42]

    T. Wang, X. Li, Mist film cooling simulation at gas turbine operating conditions, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 51 (2008) 5305-5317

  43. [43]

    Biswal, M.R

    P. Biswal, M.R. P, C. Balaji, Research advances on mist assisted impingement and film cooling o f turbine blades, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 232 (2024) 125907

  44. [44]

    X. Li, T. Wang, Simulation of Film Cooling Enhancement With Mist Injection, Journal of Heat Transfer 128 (2005) 509-519

  45. [45]

    Perkowski, A

    W. Perkowski, A. Bilar, M. Augustyn, M. Kawalec, Air -breathing rotating detonation engine supplied with liquid kerosene: propulsive performance and combustion stability, Shock Waves 34 (2024) 181–192

  46. [46]

    H.L. Meng, Q. Xiao, W.K. Feng, M.L. Wu, X.P. Han, F. Wang, C.S. Weng, Q. Zheng, Air-breathing rotating detonation fueled by liquid kerosene in cavity-based annular combustor, Aerospace Science and Technology 122 (2022) 107407

  47. [47]

    C. Yan, J. Zhao, Y . Tong, B. Wang, C. Shu, W. Nie, W. Lin, Formation and Evolution of the Numerical Air-Breathing Rotating Detonation Fueled by C12H23, Combustion Science and Technology 197 (2025) 276-309

  48. [48]

    Ranz, W.R

    W.E. Ranz, W.R. Marshall, Evaporation from drops: Part 2, Chemical Engineering Progress 48 (1952) 173-180

  49. [49]

    Ranz, W.R

    W.E. Ranz, W.R. Marshall, Evaporation from drops: Part 1, Chemical Engineering Progress 48 (1952) 141-146

  50. [50]

    Franzelli, E

    B. Franzelli, E. Riber, M. Sanjosé, T. Poinsot, A two -step chemical scheme for kerosene-air premixed flames, Combustion and Flame 157 (2010) 1364-1373

  51. [51]

    Liu, M.-Y

    X.-Y . Liu, M.-Y . Luan, Y .-L. Chen, J.-P. Wang, Propagation behavior of rotating detonation waves with premixed kerosene/air mixtures, Fuel 294 (2021) 120253

  52. [52]

    Huang, Z

    X. Huang, Z. Lin, Analysis of coupled -waves structure and propagation characteristics in hydrogen -assisted kerosene -air two -phase rotating detonation wave, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47 (2022) 4868-4884

  53. [53]

    Z. Ren, Y . Sun, B. Wang, Propagation behaviors of the rotating detonation wave in kerosene–air two-phase mixtures with wide equivalence ratios, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 110 (2022) 735–753. 27

  54. [54]

    Z. Luan, J. Liu, Y . Huang, S. Gao, Z. Sun, The interaction mechanism between detonation wave and liquid kerosene, Physics of Fluids 37 (2025) 087131

  55. [55]

    W. Cao, Q. Liu, F. Wang, C. Weng, Effects of the droplet size and engine size on two-phase kerosene/air rotating detonation engines in flight operation conditions, Acta Astronautica 223 (2024) 108-118

  56. [56]

    Z. Ren, L. Zheng, Numerical study on rotating detonation stability in two -phase kerosene-air mixture, Combustion and Flame 231 (2021) 111484

  57. [57]

    T. Huo, P. Su, X. Du, L. Li, R. Zhang, L. Zhou, H. Zhang, An experimental investigation of air, mist/air, and steam film cooling on a flat plate with single- and double-row holes, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 169 (2025) 111559

  58. [58]

    Gordon, B.J

    S. Gordon, B.J. McBride, Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications. Part 1: Analysis, 1994

  59. [59]

    Bach, C.O

    E. Bach, C.O. Paschereit, P. Stathopoulos, M.D. Bohon, An empirical model for stagnation pressure gain in rotating detonation combustors, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 38 (2020) 3807-3814

  60. [60]

    Z. Jiao, K. Wang, Q. Xiao, Y . Zhang, W. Fan, Characteristic velocity analysis of the total pressure gain of rotating detonation combu stors, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 40 (2024) 105626

  61. [61]

    Brophy, A

    C.M. Brophy, A. Thoeny, Geometry impact on the operability and delivered pressure gain characteristics of a rotating detonation combustor, AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, 2024