pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14426 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph · physics.flu-dyn

A tensor invariant approach to energy flux in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

Conan M. Liptrott , Sandra C. Chapman , Bogdan Hnat , Nicholas W. Watkins This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 11:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph physics.flu-dyn
keywords MHD turbulenceenergy fluxtensor invariantsvelocity gradient tensormagnetic field gradientsturbulent cascadefiltered equations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tensor invariants of velocity and magnetic gradient tensors act as proxies for mechanistic energy fluxes in MHD turbulence

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses the spatially filtered MHD equations to connect energy flux in the turbulent cascade to the invariants of the velocity and magnetic field gradient tensors. These invariants quantify the strength of the specific field configurations required by each physical transfer mechanism. Under quantifiable conditions the invariants serve as proxies for the actual energy fluxes, and in the special case of purely hydrodynamic contributions the flux can be written exactly in terms of the velocity gradient invariants alone. The same invariants also supply upper bounds on the flux that any given mechanism can carry, based on how strong the supporting gradients must be. The relations are illustrated with three-dimensional simulations of freely decaying MHD turbulence.

Core claim

Physical mechanisms responsible for energy flux require specific field configurations whose strength is quantified by tensor invariants. The tensor invariants act as proxies for mechanistic energy fluxes under quantifiable conditions. As a special case, the purely hydrodynamic contributions to energy flux can be expressed exactly in terms of the invariants of the velocity gradient tensor. The invariants bound the available energy flux for distinct physical mechanisms.

What carries the argument

The invariants of the velocity gradient tensor and the magnetic field gradient tensor, which measure the local structure and magnitude of the field configurations that support each energy-transfer channel.

If this is right

  • Hydrodynamic energy flux reduces exactly to an expression involving only the three invariants of the velocity gradient tensor.
  • Each distinct transfer mechanism is limited by an upper bound set by the strength of the required gradient configuration.
  • Scale-by-scale flux analysis can be performed by tracking how the invariants evolve under the filtered MHD equations.
  • The approach formalizes why only sufficiently intense local field gradients can sustain a given amount of energy transfer.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same invariant bounds might be tested in driven or forced MHD turbulence to see whether the proxy relation holds when external energy input is present.
  • Observational data from space plasmas could be re-analyzed by computing these invariants from measured gradients to infer dominant transfer channels without full flux decomposition.
  • The method suggests a possible reduction in computational cost for large-scale turbulence simulations if flux terms can be replaced by invariant calculations at selected scales.

Load-bearing premise

Physical mechanisms for energy flux require specific field configurations whose strength is quantified by tensor invariants, and that these invariants act as proxies under quantifiable conditions without further unstated assumptions about the turbulence or filtering.

What would settle it

A direct calculation of the energy flux terms in an MHD simulation or observation that shows substantial flux occurring while the corresponding tensor invariants remain below the predicted thresholds, or that violates the exact hydrodynamic expression.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14426 by Bogdan Hnat, Conan M. Liptrott, Nicholas W. Watkins, Sandra C. Chapman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Hierarchical decomposition of the total MHD energy flux showing the notation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a) Joint PDF of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: (a) Joint PDF of second invariants ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Ordering of averaged energy fluxes in the flow strain-rate invariant space ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: PDFs of the alignment cosines of the angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Ordering of averaged local total energy flux in the flow strain-rate invariant space, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Joint PDF of the flow strain-rate invariants ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Simulation energy spectra for kinetic energy (solid) and magnetic energy (dashed), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A scale-by-scale analysis of energy flux in the turbulent cascade can be performed using the spatially filtered magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equations, while the gradient tensor invariants are widely used to characterise the structure of velocity and magnetic fields. Physical mechanisms responsible for energy flux require specific field configurations whose strength is quantified by these tensor invariants. We explore this requirement, showing that the tensor invariants act as proxies for mechanistic energy fluxes under quantifiable conditions. As a special case, the purely hydrodynamic contributions to energy flux can be expressed exactly in terms of the invariants of the velocity gradient tensor. We also show that the invariants bound the available energy flux for distinct physical mechanisms, formalising the idea that each transfer mechanism requires field configurations with gradients of sufficient strength to support a given energy flux. Results are illustrated using 3D simulations of freely decaying MHD turbulence.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a tensor invariant approach to analyze energy flux in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence using spatially filtered equations. It demonstrates that invariants of the velocity and magnetic gradient tensors serve as proxies for distinct mechanistic energy fluxes, with an exact rewriting of the purely hydrodynamic contributions in terms of velocity gradient invariants, and bounds on the flux for each mechanism. The approach is illustrated with simulations of freely decaying MHD turbulence.

Significance. This framework offers a promising way to connect the geometric structure of the fields, quantified by tensor invariants, to the physical mechanisms of energy transfer in MHD turbulence. The algebraic nature of the derivations, based on standard filtered MHD equations, provides a solid foundation without free parameters or ad-hoc assumptions. If the proxy relations hold under the stated conditions, it could enable more insightful diagnostics of turbulence cascades.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract claims 'quantifiable conditions' for the proxies; the main text should more explicitly link these conditions to specific equations or inequalities where the proxy validity is derived.
  2. The figures in the simulation section would benefit from additional quantitative metrics (e.g., correlation coefficients or relative errors) showing agreement between the invariant-based proxies and the computed fluxes, even if the simulations are primarily illustrative.
  3. Ensure consistent notation for the second and third invariants (e.g., Q and R for strain/rotation tensors and their magnetic analogues) across all sections, with clear definitions and references to standard definitions upon first use.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of our work on the tensor invariant approach to energy flux in MHD turbulence and for highlighting its potential to connect geometric field structures to physical transfer mechanisms. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. However, the report lists no specific major comments, so we have no points requiring direct response or revision at this time. We remain available to address any additional feedback from the editor.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations are algebraic identities from filtered MHD equations

full rationale

The paper derives relations between tensor invariants of the velocity and magnetic gradient tensors and the filtered energy flux terms directly from the spatially filtered MHD equations. The central results—an exact rewriting of the purely hydrodynamic flux in terms of velocity gradient invariants and bounds on flux magnitudes—are obtained by algebraic manipulation and standard definitions of the second and third invariants (strain and rotation tensors plus magnetic analogues). No parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions; no self-citation chain is invoked to justify uniqueness or ansatz choices; the simulations serve only for illustration. The approach therefore remains self-contained against the external benchmark of the unfiltered MHD equations and the mathematical definitions of the invariants.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only information limits visibility into parameters or entities; the work relies on standard filtered equations and tensor properties without introducing new fitted constants or postulated objects.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Spatially filtered MHD equations permit scale-by-scale analysis of energy flux
    Explicitly invoked as the basis for performing the scale-by-scale analysis.
  • standard math Gradient tensor invariants characterize the structure of velocity and magnetic fields
    Stated as widely used tools for field characterization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5451 in / 1263 out tokens · 43643 ms · 2026-05-10T11:28:30.589770+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Contribution Following the convention in Capocciet al.[20], we label the four constituent terms in eqs. (11) and (12) as ΠI,ℓ =−τ uu ij ∂j ¯ui,(13) ΠM,ℓ =τ bb ij ∂j ¯ui,(14) ΠA,ℓ =−τ bu ij ∂j¯bi,(15) ΠD,ℓ =τ ub ij ∂j¯bi,(16) where the superscripts stand for Inertial, Maxwell, Advection, and Dynamo. The sum ΠI,ℓ + ΠM,ℓ = Πu,ℓ gives the flux of large-scale ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    This approach naturally separates flux contributions intoscale localandscale non-localcomponents

    Locality It was demonstrated by Johnson [9], and extended to MHD in Capocciet al.[20], that specifying a Gaussian low-pass filter, Gℓ(r) = 1 (2πℓ2)3/2 exp − |r|2 2ℓ2 ,(17) allows for an analytic expression of the subscale stressesτ f g ij in terms of field gradients ¯Aij =∂ j ¯ui and ¯Bij =∂ j¯bi. This approach naturally separates flux contributions intos...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The coarse-grained gradient tensors can be decomposed into their symmetric and antisymmetric parts

    Mechanism The physical mechanisms driving these fluxes can be revealed by substitution of a suitable decomposition of the velocity and magnetic field gradient tensors [9, 20]. The coarse-grained gradient tensors can be decomposed into their symmetric and antisymmetric parts. The coarse-grained velocity gradient tensor becomes ¯Aij = ¯Sij + ¯Ωij, where ¯Si...

    work page

  4. [4]

    As functions of the eigenvalues, the principal invariants do not change under coordinate transformations

    Tensor Invariants A second order tensorXcan be characterised by three principal invariants arising as the coefficients of its characteristic equation, det(X−λI) =λ 3 +P λ 2 +Qλ+R= 0,(24) whose solutions are the eigenvaluesλ i ofX. As functions of the eigenvalues, the principal invariants do not change under coordinate transformations. The invariants take ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Note that ¯QS ≤0 but ¯QJ ≥0, accounting for the difference in sign

    Dissipation Rates From Second Invariants The dissipation rates of large-scale kinetic and magnetic energies,D u andD b, can be written directly in terms of the second invariants of the flow strain-rate tensor and current density tensor, respectively, as ¯QS =− 1 4ν Du, ¯QJ = 1 4η Db.(28) Thus ¯Qs and ¯QJ are measures of the dissipation rates of large-scal...

    work page

  6. [6]

    sheet-like

    Strain-Rate Eigenvalues and Third Invariant The properties of the strain-rate eigenvalues reveal the physical meaning of the third invari- ant, and are central to the later development of the invariant-flux framework. Since the flow strain-rate tensor ¯Sis real, symmetric, and trace-free, it has three real eigenvaluesλ i that must satisfyλ 1 +λ 2 +λ 3 = 0...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Vi` etes Formula for the Eigenvalues A useful property of the strain-rate eigenvalues will help establish the expected magnitude of the energy fluxes in ( ¯RS, ¯QS) space. The strain-rate tensor ¯Sij has three real eigenvalues, so Vi` ete’s formula allows us to write these eigenvalues in terms of the invariants as λk = 2 r − ¯QS 3 cos " 1 3 arccos 3 ¯RS 2...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Hydrodynamic Case The hydrodynamic terms in the Inertial flux are composed of single field contributions and may therefore be written explicitly as functions of the invariants. In particular, the flux of kinetic energy due to strain self-amplification and vorticity stretching are fully captured by the third invariants of the velocity field through ΠI,ℓ L,...

    work page

  9. [9]

    However, the flow strain-rate invariants are related to the general energy flux under the conditions set out below

    General Case The general energy flux term ΠX,ℓ L,SY Z cannot be expressed uniquely in terms of the invariants, since it may contain mixed-field derivatives. However, the flow strain-rate invariants are related to the general energy flux under the conditions set out below. In Section II D 3, it was shown that ¯RS takes the sign of, and is proportional to, ...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Using the dual tensor relation, 25 100 101 102 k 10!6 10!4 10!2 100 E(k) EK EM k2 100 101 102 k 10!3 10!2 10!1 100 101 E(k)"k5=3 EK EM k2 FIG

    Derivation of V ector-Angle F orm Both the current filament stretching and vorticity stretching terms share a general form involving the triple contraction of the symmetric strain-rate tensor, ¯Sij, with two anti- symmetric tensors that form the dual tensors for a vectorx. Using the dual tensor relation, 25 100 101 102 k 10!6 10!4 10!2 100 E(k) EK EM k2 1...

    work page

  11. [11]

    symmet- ric part

    Equivalence of General T ensor-Angle form and V ector-Angle F orm We show that the vector-angle forms of the fluxes ΠI,ℓ L,ΩSΩ and ΠM,ℓ L,SJJ in equations Eq. (B1) and Eq. (22) are equivalent to the general tensor-angle form in Eq. (23) (main text). Both forms are well-known [10, 20, 45], but their explicit connection has not, to the best of our knowledge...

    work page

  12. [12]

    Lagrange Multiplier Optimisation: Bifurcation Example We derive the bound for the local inertial flux Π I,ℓ L =−ℓ 2tr ¯AT ¯A ¯AT . From the expan- sion tr( ¯AT ¯A ¯AT ) = tr( ¯S3)−tr( ¯S ¯Ω2), working in the eigenbasis of ¯Sthis second term can be written −tr( ¯S ¯Ω) =−tr     λ1 0 0 0λ 2 0 0 0λ 3     0 Ω 12 Ω13 −Ω12 0 Ω 23 −Ω13 −Ω23 0 ...

    work page

  13. [13]

    The Lagrangian is Ls = X i λ3 i − ¯QΩλ3 −α X i λi −β X i λ2 i + 2 ¯QS !

    This amounts to concentrating vorticity on the (1,2) off-diagonal component, and the objective reduces to F= X i λ3 i − ¯QΩλ3 withλ 3 being the eigenvalue not paired with the vorticity. The Lagrangian is Ls = X i λ3 i − ¯QΩλ3 −α X i λi −β X i λ2 i + 2 ¯QS ! . The stationarity conditions are then 3λ2 1 −α−2βλ 1 = 0,(B2) 3λ2 2 −α−2βλ 2 = 0,(B3) 3λ2 3 − ¯QΩ ...

    work page

  14. [14]

    Bavassano, M

    B. Bavassano, M. Dobrowolny, F. Mariani, and N. F. Ness, Radial evolution of power spectra of interplanetary Alfv´ enic turbulence - Bavassano, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics87, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA087iA05p03617 (1982)

    work page doi:10.1029/ja087ia05p03617 1982

  15. [15]

    M. L. Goldstein, D. A. Roberts, and W. H. Matthaeus, Magnetohydrodynamic turbulence in the solar wind, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. (1995)

    work page 1995

  16. [16]

    Biskamp,Magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Book, Whole (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003)

    D. Biskamp,Magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Book, Whole (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003)

    work page 2003

  17. [17]

    Bruno and V

    R. Bruno and V. Carbone, The Solar Wind as a Turbulence Laboratory, Living Reviews in Solar Physics10, 2 (2013)

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    Sahraoui, L

    F. Sahraoui, L. Hadid, and S. Huang, Magnetohydrodynamic and kinetic scale turbulence in the near-Earth space plasmas: a (short) biased review, Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41614-020-0040-2 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1007/s41614-020-0040-2 2020

  19. [19]

    Alexakis and L

    A. Alexakis and L. Biferale, Cascades and transitions in turbulent flows, Physics Reports 767-769, 1 (2018), arXiv:1808.06186 [physics]

    work page arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    A. A. Schekochihin, MHD turbulence: a biased review, Journal of Plasma Physics88, 155880501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Germano, Turbulence: the filtering approach, Journal of Fluid Mechanics238, 325 (1992)

    M. Germano, Turbulence: the filtering approach, Journal of Fluid Mechanics238, 325 (1992)

    work page 1992

  22. [22]

    P. L. Johnson, Energy Transfer from Large to Small Scales in Turbulence by Multiscale Nonlinear Strain and Vorticity Interactions, Physical Review Letters124, 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.124.104501 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2020

  23. [23]

    P. L. Johnson, On the role of vorticity stretching and strain self-amplification in the turbulence energy cascade, Journal of Fluid Mechanics922, A3 (2021). 31

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    P. L. Johnson and M. Wilczek, Multiscale Velocity Gradients in Turbulence, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics56, 463 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Kessar, G

    M. Kessar, G. Balarac, and F. Plunian, The effect of subgrid-scale models on grid- scale/subgrid-scale energy transfers in large-eddy simulation of incompressible magnetohy- drodynamic turbulence, Physics of Plasmas23, 102305 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Aluie, Coarse-grained incompressible magnetohydrodynamics: analyzing the turbulent cas- cades, New Journal of Physics19, 025008 (2017)

    H. Aluie, Coarse-grained incompressible magnetohydrodynamics: analyzing the turbulent cas- cades, New Journal of Physics19, 025008 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    G. P. Offermans, L. Biferale, M. Buzzicotti, and M. Linkmann,A prioristudy of the sub- grid energy transfers for small-scale dynamo in kinematic and saturation regimes, Physics of Plasmas25, 122307 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Bian and H

    X. Bian and H. Aluie, Decoupled Cascades of Kinetic and Magnetic Energy in Magnetohy- drodynamic Turbulence, Physical Review Letters122, 135101 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Alexakis and S

    A. Alexakis and S. Chibbaro, Local fluxes in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Journal of Plasma Physics88, 905880515 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Manzini, F

    D. Manzini, F. Sahraoui, F. Califano, and R. Ferrand, Local energy transfer and dissipa- tion in incompressible Hall magnetohydrodynamic turbulence: The coarse-graining approach, Physical Review E106, 035202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Benella, V

    S. Benella, V. Quattrociocchi, E. Papini, A. Verdini, S. Landi, M. F. Marcucci, and G. Con- solini, Self-organization of Local Streamline Structures and Energy Transfer Rate in Com- pressible Plasma Turbulence, The Astrophysical Journal Letters1001, L27 (2026)

    work page 2026

  32. [32]

    Y. Yang, W. H. Matthaeus, T. N. Parashar, C. C. Haggerty, V. Roytershteyn, W. Daughton, M. Wan, Y. Shi, and S. Chen, Energy transfer, pressure tensor, and heating of kinetic plasma, Physics of Plasmas24, 072306 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Capocci, P

    D. Capocci, P. L. Johnson, S. Oughton, L. Biferale, and M. Linkmann, Energy flux decompo- sition in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Journal of Plasma Physics91, E11 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    M. S. Chong, A. E. Perry, and B. J. Cantwell, A general classification of three-dimensional flow fields, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics2, 765 (1990)

    work page 1990

  35. [35]

    Tsinober,An informal introduction to turbulence, Book, Whole (Kluwer Academic Pub- lishers, Boston, Mass;Dordrecht;, 2001)

    A. Tsinober,An informal introduction to turbulence, Book, Whole (Kluwer Academic Pub- lishers, Boston, Mass;Dordrecht;, 2001)

    work page 2001

  36. [36]

    P. A. Davidson,Turbulence: an introduction for scientists and engineers, Book, Whole (Ox- ford University Press, New York;Oxford, United Kingdom;, 2004). 32

    work page 2004

  37. [37]

    Meneveau, Lagrangian dynamics and models of the velocity gradient tensor in turbulent flows, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics43, 219 (2011)

    C. Meneveau, Lagrangian dynamics and models of the velocity gradient tensor in turbulent flows, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics43, 219 (2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Dallas and A

    V. Dallas and A. Alexakis, Structures and dynamics of small scales in decaying magnetohy- drodynamic turbulence, Physics of Fluids25, 105106 (2013)

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    Consolini, M

    G. Consolini, M. Materassi, M. F. Marcucci, and G. Pallocchia, Statistics of the Velocity Gradient Tensor in Space Plasma Turbulent Flows, The Astrophysical Journal812, 84 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Paschmann and P

    G. Paschmann and P. W. Daly,Analysis Methods for Multi-Spacecraft Data(ESA Publications Division, 1998)

    work page 1998

  41. [41]

    R. E. Denton, Y.-H. Liu, H. Hasegawa, R. B. Torbert, W. Li, S. Fuselier, and J. L. Burch, Poly- nomial Reconstruction of the Magnetic Field Observed by Multiple Spacecraft With Integrated Velocity Determination, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics127, e2022JA030512 (2022), eprint: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2022JA030512

    work page doi:10.1029/2022ja030512 2022

  42. [42]

    Quattrociocchi, G

    V. Quattrociocchi, G. Consolini, M. F. Marcucci, and M. Materassi, On Geometrical Invariants of the Magnetic Field Gradient Tensor in Turbulent Space Plasmas: Scale Variability in the Inertial Range, The Astrophysical Journal878, 124 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Bandyopadhyay, W

    R. Bandyopadhyay, W. H. Matthaeus, T. N. Parashar, Y. Yang, A. Chasapis, B. L. Giles, D. J. Gershman, C. J. Pollock, C. T. Russell, R. J. Strangeway, R. B. Torbert, T. E. Moore, and J. L. Burch, Statistics of Kinetic Dissipation in the Earth’s Magnetosheath: MMS Observations, Physical Review Letters124, 255101 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    B. Hnat, S. Chapman, and N. Watkins, Magnetic Topology of Actively Evolving and Passively Convecting Structures in the Turbulent Solar Wind, Physical Review Letters126, 125101 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Y. Ji, C. Shen, L. Ma, N. Ren, and N. Ahmad, Statistics of geometrical invariants of magnetic field gradient tensors in the turbulent magnetosheath based on magnetospheric multiscale mission, Physics of Fluids35, 025107 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Zhang, S

    J. Zhang, S. Y. Huang, F. Sahraoui, N. Andr´ es, Z. G. Yuan, K. Jiang, S. B. Xu, Y. Y. Wei, Q. Y. Xiong, Z. Wang, R. T. Lin, and L. Yu, Topology of Magnetic and Velocity Fields at Kinetic Scales in Incompressible Plasma Turbulence, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics128, e2022JA031064 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    B. Hnat, S. C. Chapman, C. M. Liptrott, and N. W. Watkins, Solar wind magnetohydrody- namic turbulence energy transfer rate ordered by magnetic field topology, Physical Review 33 Research7, 043058 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Quattrociocchi, G

    V. Quattrociocchi, G. Consolini, M. Materassi, A. Verdini, and E. Papini, On the evolution equations of velocity field gradient tensor invariants in different turbulent heliospheric regions, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals191, 115900 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Quattrociocchi, G

    V. Quattrociocchi, G. Consolini, and M. Materassi, On Schur Decomposition of Magnetic and Velocity Gradient Tensors in Space Plasma Turbulence, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 998, L19 (2026)

    work page 2026

  50. [50]

    D. O. G´ omez, P. D. Mininni, and P. Dmitruk, Parallel Simulations in Turbulent MHD, Physica Scripta2005, 123 (2005)

    work page 2005

  51. [51]

    E. R. Priest,Solar Magnetohydrodynamics, edited by E. R. Priest, Book, Whole (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1982)

    work page 1982

  52. [52]

    J. G. Ballouz, P. L. Johnson, and N. T. Ouellette, Temporal dynamics of the alignment of the turbulent stress and strain rate, Physical Review Fluids5, 114606 (2020)

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    R. E. Denton, R. B. Torbert, H. Hasegawa, I. Dors, K. J. Genestreti, M. R. Argall, D. Gersh- man, O. Le Contel, J. L. Burch, C. T. Russell, R. J. Strangeway, B. L. Giles, and D. Fischer, Polynomial Reconstruction of the Reconnection Magnetic Field Observed by Multiple Space- craft, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics125, e2019JA027481 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Sorriso-Valvo, D

    L. Sorriso-Valvo, D. Perrone, O. Pezzi, F. Valentini, S. Servidio, I. Zouganelis, and P. Vel- tri, Local energy transfer rate and kinetic processes: the fate of turbulent energy in two- dimensional hybrid Vlasov–Maxwell numerical simulations, Journal of Plasma Physics84, 725840201 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Sorriso-Valvo, F

    L. Sorriso-Valvo, F. Catapano, A. Retin` o, O. Le Contel, D. Perrone, O. W. Roberts, J. T. Coburn, V. Panebianco, F. Valentini, S. Perri, A. Greco, F. Malara, V. Carbone, P. Vel- tri, O. Pezzi, F. Fraternale, F. Di Mare, R. Marino, B. Giles, T. E. Moore, C. T. Russell, R. B. Torbert, J. L. Burch, and Y. V. Khotyaintsev, Turbulence-Driven Ion Beams in the ...

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    S. B. Pope,Turbulent flows, 1st ed. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2015)

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    Pouquet and G

    A. Pouquet and G. S. Patterson, Numerical simulation of helical magnetohydrodynamic tur- bulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics85, 305 (1978)

    work page 1978

  58. [58]

    J. G. Ballouz and N. T. Ouellette, Tensor geometry in the turbulent cascade, Journal of Fluid Mechanics835, 1048 (2018). 34

    work page 2018