pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14822 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Spectral and spatial filtering of whispering gallery modes in precision-engineered microbubble resonators

Ramgopal Madugani , Amal Jose , Christophe Pin , Metin Ozer , Martina Hentschel , S\'ile Nic Chormaic This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 10:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords microbubble resonatorswhispering gallery modesfocused ion beam millingaxial mode filteringpressure sensingspectral tuninggeometric filtersoptical resonators
0
0 comments X

The pith

Geometric patterns milled into microbubble resonators filter axial modes to eliminate mixing artifacts in sensing and tuning.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Microbubble resonators offer high-Q whispering gallery modes with tight radial confinement and low spectral density, yet their high axial-mode density still produces mixing and interference that hinders precise spectral shift measurements. The paper shows that focused ion beam milling can create tailored surface patterns such as circular dips, holes, and shallow slits to suppress unwanted axial modes while keeping scattering losses low. Experiments confirm local lateral confinement, partial Q-factor recovery, and clean few-mode spectra. These engineered resonators then support artifact-free pressure sensing and broad spectral tuning. A reader would care because removing modal clutter makes microbubble devices more reliable for sensing and photonic applications.

Core claim

Fabricating large tapered geometric filters such as circular surface dips or holes on microbubble resonators effectively filters axial modes while minimizing optical scattering losses; adding shallow slit patterns yields local lateral mode confinement and partial high-Q recovery, thereby enabling few-mode resonators that demonstrate pressure sensing and wide spectral tuning free from mode-mixing artifacts.

What carries the argument

FIB-milled geometric patterns (circular dips, holes, and slits) that enforce axial-mode filtering and lateral confinement on the microbubble surface.

If this is right

  • Pressure sensing becomes possible without modal interference distorting the measured shifts.
  • Wide spectral tuning of individual WGMs can be performed cleanly in the few-mode regime.
  • Mode isolation improves, supporting ultrasensitive measurements in microbubble devices.
  • The same surface patterning opens routes to tunable directional emission.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be adapted to other hollow dielectric resonators to achieve similar axial-mode control.
  • Encapsulating analytes inside the microbubbles might then yield cleaner chemical or biological sensing signals.
  • Reduced mode density may simplify integration with on-chip waveguides or detectors.

Load-bearing premise

The FIB-milled geometric patterns will selectively suppress axial modes without introducing enough scattering to destroy the high Q-factor.

What would settle it

Spectra from patterned microbubbles that still show dense, overlapping axial modes or a large drop in Q compared with unpatterned controls.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14822 by Amal Jose, Christophe Pin, Martina Hentschel, Metin Ozer, Ramgopal Madugani, S\'ile Nic Chormaic.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Simulated intensity distribution of the first ten TM WGMs with an azimuthal mode number of 293 for a 155 µm diameter microbubble (a) without modification, (b) partially milled, and (c) completely truncated on one side (as depicted in the cross-section schematics). Scale bar: 5 µm. (d) Resonant wavelengths of the WGMs with up to ten intensity maxima along the polar direction in the 1550 nm to 1560 nm range.… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: WGM filtering effect of a large rectangular dip. (a) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a 101 µm diameter mi￾crobubble, with a wall thickness of 1.5 µm, after milling an off-equator 5 × 30 µm2 rectangle next to a 400 nm deep "><"-like slit pattern spanning the equator. The dotted area in (a) is partially shown from an oblique angle in (b), revealing a milled depth of about 1 µm for the rectangular… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: WGM filtering effect of a large circular dip. (a) SEM image of a 130 µm diameter microbubble, with a wall thickness of 1.3 µm, after milling an off-equator 30 µm diameter disk next to a shallow slit pattern at the equator. The 100 nm-deep, 4 µm2 sur￾face mill within the disk was used for finer FIB focus adjustment. The dotted box in (a) is shown from an oblique angle in (b), re￾vealing a milled depth of ∼1… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: High-Q filtered WGMs. (a) SEM image of a 155 µm-diameter microbubble resonator, with a wall thickness of 0.84 µm, after milling an off-equator 30 µm-diameter circular hole. (b) Zoom on the dotted box area in (a) showing the 1 µm-thick silica disk par￾tially released during the FIB processing but still attached on one side. (c) Zoom on the dotted box area in (b) showing the shallow 400 nm-deep slit pattern … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Field distributions of the filtered WGMs. The IR camera images show the light radiation scattered at the submicron pattern focus (a) for the fundamental mode, (b) highlighting different focus positions of the IR camera, (c) for the third-order axial mode, of the spectrum shown in (d). IR camera images for focusing on the top-most edge of the microbubble for (e) the fundamental mode, (f) the second-, (g) th… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Pressure tuning of the WGMs of a partially milled microbubble cavity. (a) IR camera images showing the intensity distribu￾tion of the first few axial modes of an ITO-coated microbubble prior to FIB processing. (b) Corresponding dense WGM spectrum revealing modes with Q-factors of about 106 around 1552 nm. (c) SEM and IR camera images of the microbubble after the fabrica￾tion of a 30 µm-diameter and 500 nm-… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Similar to microspheres, thin-walled microbubble resonators support whispering gallery modes (WGMs) that combine ultrahigh Q-factors and small effective mode volumes. In contrast, their hollow nature enables enhanced interactions with encapsulated materials and lower spectral mode density due to the tight radial confinement of the optical modes. However, the existence of a high axial-mode density still leads to significant mode mixing and modal interference that can complicate spectral shift measurements, thereby limiting sensing applications. To address this limitation, we have fabricated geometric filters directly on the surface of microbubbles using focused ion beam (FIB) milling. Based on numerical calculations, we first designed and then fabricated large tapered patterns, such as circular surface dips or holes, that could effectively filter modes while minimizing optical scattering losses. Local lateral mode confinement and partial recovery of high Q-factors were experimentally achieved by adding shallow slit patterns. Using few-mode engineered microbubble resonators, we subsequently demonstrated pressure sensing and wide spectral tuning of WGMs free from mode-mixing artifacts. This precision engineering approach promises improved mode isolation, tunable directional emission, and ultrasensitive measurements in microbubble resonator devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes numerical design and FIB-based fabrication of geometric patterns (circular dips, holes, and shallow slits) on thin-walled microbubble resonators to filter axial whispering gallery modes (WGMs), reduce mode density and mixing, achieve local lateral confinement with partial Q-factor recovery, and enable demonstrations of pressure sensing and wide spectral tuning free from mode-mixing artifacts.

Significance. If the experimental validation of effective axial-mode suppression holds, the approach offers a practical route to improved mode isolation in microbubble resonators, enhancing their utility for sensing and tunable photonic devices by mitigating modal interference that currently limits spectral shift measurements.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results / Experimental Demonstrations] The central claim that the FIB-engineered resonators enable pressure sensing and spectral tuning 'free from mode-mixing artifacts' (abstract and results section) is load-bearing but rests on an unverified assumption: that the milled patterns produce spectra with demonstrably reduced axial-mode density and no residual interference. No explicit mode counting, FSR analysis, or side-by-side comparison of patterned vs. unpatterned control spectra is reported to confirm complete suppression versus partial filtering with possible unmodeled scattering or mixing that could still affect resonance shifts or broadening.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'partial recovery of high Q-factors' without quoting the achieved values, the original Q of unpatterned devices, or the theoretical limit for the given geometry, making it difficult to assess the scattering penalty of the patterns.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive assessment and for identifying a key area where the experimental validation of mode filtering can be strengthened. We address the major comment below and will incorporate the requested quantitative comparisons in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results / Experimental Demonstrations] The central claim that the FIB-engineered resonators enable pressure sensing and spectral tuning 'free from mode-mixing artifacts' (abstract and results section) is load-bearing but rests on an unverified assumption: that the milled patterns produce spectra with demonstrably reduced axial-mode density and no residual interference. No explicit mode counting, FSR analysis, or side-by-side comparison of patterned vs. unpatterned control spectra is reported to confirm complete suppression versus partial filtering with possible unmodeled scattering or mixing that could still affect resonance shifts or broadening.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from more explicit quantitative evidence to support the claim of reduced axial-mode density and minimal residual interference. While the reported pressure-sensing and spectral-tuning data show clean, artifact-free resonance shifts consistent with few-mode operation, we acknowledge the absence of direct side-by-side spectral comparisons, mode counting, and FSR analysis between patterned and unpatterned devices. In the revised version we will add: (i) overlaid spectra of control and FIB-milled resonators, (ii) explicit counting of observed axial modes within the relevant spectral window, and (iii) FSR measurements compared against numerical predictions to quantify the suppression and rule out significant unmodeled scattering or mixing effects on the shift measurements. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in experimental design and demonstration

full rationale

The paper describes fabrication of FIB-milled geometric patterns on microbubble resonators, guided by numerical calculations for initial design, followed by experimental measurements of mode filtering, Q-factor recovery, pressure sensing, and spectral tuning. No equations, derivations, or fitted parameters are presented that reduce any prediction or central claim to its own inputs by construction. Claims rest on physical fabrication and spectral measurements rather than self-referential mathematical loops or load-bearing self-citations. The work is self-contained as an experimental study without the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the abstract; the work relies on standard numerical design and experimental fabrication techniques.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5517 in / 929 out tokens · 31562 ms · 2026-05-10T10:22:14.939010+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Quality-factor and nonlinear properties of optical whispering-gallery modes,

    V. B. Braginsky, M. L. Gorodetsky, and V. S. Ilchenko, “Quality-factor and nonlinear properties of optical whispering-gallery modes,” Phys. Lett. A137, 393 (1989)

    work page 1989

  2. [2]

    Ideality in a fiber-taper-coupled microresonator system for application to cavity quantum electrodynamics,

    S. M. Spillane, T. J. Kippenberg, O. J. Painter, and K. J. Vahala, “Ideality in a fiber-taper-coupled microresonator system for application to cavity quantum electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 043902 (2003)

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    Ultralow threshold green lasing and optical bistability in ZBNA (ZrF4–BaF2–NaF–AlF3) microspheres,

    Y . Wu, J. M. Ward, and S. Nic Chormaic, “Ultralow threshold green lasing and optical bistability in ZBNA (ZrF4–BaF2–NaF–AlF3) microspheres,” J. Appl. Phys.107, 033103 (2010). 10

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Packaged silica microsphere-taper coupling system for robust thermal sensing application,

    Y . Z. Y an, C. L. Zou, S. B. Y an,et al., “Packaged silica microsphere-taper coupling system for robust thermal sensing application,” Opt. Express19, 5753 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Cavity optomechanics,

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F . Marquardt, “Cavity optomechanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1391 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Bismuth-doped glass microsphere lasers,

    Z. Fang, S. Nic Chormaic, S. Wang,et al., “Bismuth-doped glass microsphere lasers,” Photon. Res.5, 740 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    On-chip label-free biosensing based on active whispering gallery mode resonators pumped by a light-emitting diode,

    Y . Kim and H. Lee, “On-chip label-free biosensing based on active whispering gallery mode resonators pumped by a light-emitting diode,” Opt. Express27, 34405 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Whispering-gallery-mode sensors for biological and physical sensing,

    D. Yu, M. Humar, K. Meserve,et al., “Whispering-gallery-mode sensors for biological and physical sensing,” Nat. Rev. Methods Primers1, 83 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Packaged whispering gallery resonator device based on an optical nanoantenna coupler,

    A. Li, K. Tian, J. Yu,et al., “Packaged whispering gallery resonator device based on an optical nanoantenna coupler,” Opt. Express29, 16879 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Coupling single atoms to a nanophotonic whispering-gallery-mode resonator via optical guiding,

    X. Zhou, H. Tamura, T. H. Chang,et al., “Coupling single atoms to a nanophotonic whispering-gallery-mode resonator via optical guiding,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 103601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    3D integration enables ultralow-noise isolator-free lasers in silicon photonics,

    C. Xiang, W. Jin, O. Terra,et al., “3D integration enables ultralow-noise isolator-free lasers in silicon photonics,” Nature620, 78 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Evaporation characteristics of Er3+-doped silica fiber and its application in the preparation of whispering gallery mode lasers,

    A. Li, J. M. Ward, K. Tian,et al., “Evaporation characteristics of Er3+-doped silica fiber and its application in the preparation of whispering gallery mode lasers,” Opt. Express32, 3912 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Optical microbubble resonator,

    M. Sumetsky, Y . Dulashko, and R. S. Windeler, “Optical microbubble resonator,” Opt. Lett.35, 898 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    Single-input spherical microbubble resonator,

    A. Watkins, J. Ward, Y . Wu,et al., “Single-input spherical microbubble resonator,” Opt. Lett.36, 2113 (2011)

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    Degenerate four-wave mixing in a silica hollow bottle-like microresonator,

    Y . Y ang, Y . Ooka, R. M. Thompson,et al., “Degenerate four-wave mixing in a silica hollow bottle-like microresonator,” Opt. Lett.41, 575 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Four-wave mixing parametric oscillation and frequency comb generation at visible wavelengths in a silica microbubble resonator,

    Y . Y ang, X. Jiang, S. Kasumie,et al., “Four-wave mixing parametric oscillation and frequency comb generation at visible wavelengths in a silica microbubble resonator,” Opt. Lett.41, 5266 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Dispersion in silica microbubble resonators,

    N. Riesen, W. Q. Zhang, and T. M. Monro, “Dispersion in silica microbubble resonators,” Opt. Lett.41, 1257 (2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    Blue band nonlinear optics and photodarkening in silica microdevices,

    K. Tian, J. Yu, F . Lei,et al., “Blue band nonlinear optics and photodarkening in silica microdevices,” Photon. Res.10, 2073 (2022)

    work page 2073

  19. [19]

    Absorption-induced transmission in plasma microphotonics,

    B. Bathish, R. Gad, F . Cheng,et al., “Absorption-induced transmission in plasma microphotonics,” Nat. Commun.14, 4535 (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Coupled-mode-induced transparency in aerostatically tuned microbubble whispering-gallery resonators,

    Y . Y ang, S. Saurabh, J. Ward,et al., “Coupled-mode-induced transparency in aerostatically tuned microbubble whispering-gallery resonators,” Opt. Lett. 40, 1834 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Linear laser tuning using a pressure-sensitive microbubble resonator,

    R. Madugani, Y . Y ang, V. H. Le,et al., “Linear laser tuning using a pressure-sensitive microbubble resonator,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett.28, 1134 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    High-Q, ultrathin-walled microbubble resonator for aerostatic pressure sensing,

    Y . Y ang, S. Saurabh, J. M. Ward,et al., “High-Q, ultrathin-walled microbubble resonator for aerostatic pressure sensing,” Opt. Express24, 294 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Nanoparticle sensing beyond evanescent field interaction with a quasi-droplet microcavity,

    J. M. Ward, Y . Y ang, F . Lei,et al., “Nanoparticle sensing beyond evanescent field interaction with a quasi-droplet microcavity,” Optica5, 674 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Toward real-time monitoring and control of single nanoparticle properties with a microbubble resonator spectrometer,

    L. T. Hogan, E. H. Horak, J. M. Ward,et al., “Toward real-time monitoring and control of single nanoparticle properties with a microbubble resonator spectrometer,” ACS Nano13, 12743 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    An all-optical multidirectional mechano-sensor inspired by biologically mechano-sensitive hair sensilla,

    Y . Li, Z. Guo, X. Zhao,et al., “An all-optical multidirectional mechano-sensor inspired by biologically mechano-sensitive hair sensilla,” Nat. Commun.15, 2906 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Enhanced force sensing utilizing a glass-supported WGM microbubble resonator,

    Y . Shen, Z. Wang, A. V. R,et al., “Enhanced force sensing utilizing a glass-supported WGM microbubble resonator,” J. Light. Technol.43, 5989 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Quasi-droplet microbubbles for high resolution sensing applications,

    Y . Y ang, J. Ward, and S. Nic Chormaic, “Quasi-droplet microbubbles for high resolution sensing applications,” Opt. Express22, 6881 (2014)

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    Active control of plasmonic-photonic interactions in a microbubble cavity,

    F . Pan, K. Karlsson, A. G. Nixon,et al., “Active control of plasmonic-photonic interactions in a microbubble cavity,” J. Phys. Chem. C126, 20470 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Magnetic sensor based on WGM hollow microbubble resonator filled with magnetic fluid,

    W. Liu, W. Li, R. Wang,et al., “Magnetic sensor based on WGM hollow microbubble resonator filled with magnetic fluid,” Opt. Commun.497, 127148 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Magnetospirillum bacteria sensing using a microbubble WGM resonator

    A. Jose, R. Madugani, R. S. Kalra, and S. Nic Chormaic, “Magnetospirillum bacteria sensing using a microbubble WGM resonator.” inNonlinear Optics and its Applications 2024,vol. 13004 J. M. Dudley, A. C. Peacock, B. Stiller, and G. Tissoni, eds. (SPIE, 2024), p. 1300403

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    X-ray microcomputed tomography of 3D chaotic microcavities,

    K. Tian, M. Z. Jalaludeen, Y . U. Lee,et al., “X-ray microcomputed tomography of 3D chaotic microcavities,” Adv. Photonics Nexus4, 066006 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Spin-orbit coupling of light in asymmetric microcavities,

    L. B. Ma, S. L. Li, V. M. Fomin,et al., “Spin-orbit coupling of light in asymmetric microcavities,” Nat. Commun.7, 10983 (2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Spin-orbit interaction of light in three-dimensional microcavities,

    J. Kreismann and M. Hentschel, “Spin-orbit interaction of light in three-dimensional microcavities,” Phys. Rev. A102, 043524 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Surface nanoscale axial photonics: robust fabrication of high-quality-factor microresonators,

    M. Sumetsky, D. J. DiGiovanni, Y . Dulashko,et al., “Surface nanoscale axial photonics: robust fabrication of high-quality-factor microresonators,” Opt. Lett. 36, 4824 (2011)

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    Structural characterization of thin-walled microbubble cavities,

    M. Z. Jalaludeen, S. Li, K. Tian,et al., “Structural characterization of thin-walled microbubble cavities,” Photonics Res.11, A19 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Smectic and soap bubble optofluidic lasers,

    Z. Korenjak and M. Humar, “Smectic and soap bubble optofluidic lasers,” Phys. Rev. X14, 011002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Exceptional-point-controlled mode interaction in three-dimensional microcavities represented by generalized husimi functions,

    T. S. Rodemund, S. Li, S. Nic Chormaic,et al., “Exceptional-point-controlled mode interaction in three-dimensional microcavities represented by generalized husimi functions,” Phys. Rev. A112, 033528 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Hollow-bottle optical microresonators,

    G. S. Murugan, M. N. Petrovich, Y . Jung,et al., “Hollow-bottle optical microresonators,” Opt. Express19, 20773 (2011)

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    Whispering gallery mode selection in optical bottle microresonators,

    M. Ding, G. Senthil Murugan, G. Brambilla,et al., “Whispering gallery mode selection in optical bottle microresonators,” Appl. Phys. Lett.100, 081108 (2012)

    work page 2012

  40. [40]

    A spectral cleaning method of whispering gallery modes resonance in the microsphere resonator,

    F . Xiang, L. Cai, J. Liu,et al., “A spectral cleaning method of whispering gallery modes resonance in the microsphere resonator,” J. Light. Technol. p. 7260 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Shape-tailored whispering gallery microcavity lasers designed by transformation optics,

    Y . H. Lee, H. Park, I. Kim,et al., “Shape-tailored whispering gallery microcavity lasers designed by transformation optics,” Photonics Res.11, A35 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Strain sensing based on a microbottle resonator with cleaned-up spectrum,

    Y . Yin, Y . Niu, M. Ren,et al., “Strain sensing based on a microbottle resonator with cleaned-up spectrum,” Opt. Lett.43, 4715 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Nonorthogonal pairs of copropagating optical modes in deformed microdisk cavities,

    J. Wiersig, A. Eberspächer, J. B. Shim,et al., “Nonorthogonal pairs of copropagating optical modes in deformed microdisk cavities,” Phys. Rev. A84, 023845 (2011)

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    Highly sensitive temperature measurements with liquid-core microbubble resonators,

    J. M. Ward, Y . Y ang, and S. Nic Chormaic, “Highly sensitive temperature measurements with liquid-core microbubble resonators,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett.25, 2350–2353 (2013)

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    Formation of long-lived, scarlike modes near avoided resonance crossings in optical microcavities,

    J. Wiersig, “Formation of long-lived, scarlike modes near avoided resonance crossings in optical microcavities,” Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 253901 (2006)

    work page 2006

  46. [46]

    Dynamical thermal behavior and thermal self-stability of microcavities,

    T. Carmon, L. Y ang, and K. Vahala, “Dynamical thermal behavior and thermal self-stability of microcavities,” Opt. Express12, 4742 (2004)

    work page 2004

  47. [47]

    Whispering gallery mode sensors,

    M. R. Foreman, J. D. Swaim, and F . Vollmer, “Whispering gallery mode sensors,” Adv. Opt. Photonics7, 168 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    Whispering-gallery sensors,

    X. Jiang, A. J. Qavi, S. H. Huang, and L. Y ang, “Whispering-gallery sensors,” Matter3, 371 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Rayleigh scattering, mode coupling, and optical loss in silicon microdisks,

    M. Borselli, K. Srinivasan, P . E. Barclay,et al., “Rayleigh scattering, mode coupling, and optical loss in silicon microdisks,” Appl. Phys. Lett.85, 3693 (2004)

    work page 2004

  50. [50]

    Contributed review: Optical micro-and nanofiber pulling rig,

    J. M. Ward, A. Maimaiti, V. H. Le, and S. Nic Chormaic, “Contributed review: Optical micro-and nanofiber pulling rig,” Rev. Sci. Instruments85, 111501 (2014)

    work page 2014