pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15074 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.SY· eess.SY

Recognition: unknown

Trajectory Planning for a Multi-UAV Rigid-Payload Cascaded Transportation System Based on Enhanced Tube-RRT*

Jia Li, Jianqiao Yu, Tianhua Gao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 11:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.SYeess.SY
keywords trajectory planningmulti-UAVrigid payloadTube-RRT*cluttered environmentsconvex optimizationcascaded systempath smoothness
0
0 comments X

The pith

Enhanced Tube-RRT* produces shorter, smoother paths for multi-UAV rigid payload transport in cluttered spaces.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a two-stage trajectory planning method for teams of drones carrying a rigid payload connected by cables. Stage one introduces an Enhanced Tube-RRT* that combines hybrid sampling with adaptive expansion to build a safe virtual tube quickly, while adding a smoothness penalty to the path cost to limit sharp turns. Stage two solves a convex quadratic program that accounts for the payload's translation and rotation, cable tension limits, and collision avoidance. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach could enable reliable heavy-object transport by small drones in warehouses or disaster sites without excessive payload swinging.

Core claim

The Enhanced Tube-RRT* algorithm integrates active hybrid sampling and an adaptive expansion strategy to rapidly generate safe virtual tubes in dense obstacle environments, and by incorporating a trajectory smoothness cost into the edge cost, it produces shorter optimal paths with smaller cumulative turning angles compared to mixed-sampling and adaptive-extension variants of Tube-RRT*, enabling the subsequent convex quadratic program to yield collision-free desired payload trajectories for the cascaded system.

What carries the argument

Enhanced Tube-RRT* with active hybrid sampling, adaptive expansion strategy, and explicit smoothness cost for virtual tube construction, followed by convex quadratic programming that enforces payload dynamics, cable tension, and safety constraints.

If this is right

  • The method achieves higher success rates and effective sampling rates than mixed-sampling and adaptive-extension Tube-RRT* variants.
  • It yields shorter optimal paths with smaller cumulative turning angles.
  • The smoothness term reduces cable-induced oscillations during payload motion.
  • The overall framework supplies a practical route for attitude maneuvering of the rigid payload in densely cluttered environments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sampling and smoothness ideas could be adapted for online replanning when obstacles move.
  • Lower turning angles may also cut energy use during transport beyond just improving stability.
  • The two-stage structure might generalize to other multi-robot systems that carry rigid loads under cable tension.

Load-bearing premise

Simplified rigid-payload dynamics, inextensible cables, and perfect state knowledge in simulation sufficiently match real hardware conditions for the reported success rates and smoothness gains to transfer without major retuning.

What would settle it

Running the complete planning and control pipeline on physical multi-UAV hardware inside a real densely cluttered test arena and checking whether the success rate, path length, and cumulative turning angle of Enhanced Tube-RRT* exceed those of STube-RRT* and AETube-RRT*.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15074 by Jia Li, Jianqiao Yu, Tianhua Gao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of the multi-UAV tethered payload transportation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of paths generated by different algorithms. The thick red curve denotes the final path and the blue circles indicate the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Payload position and attitude tracking performance. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spatial trajectories of the UAV–payload cooperative transportation system. The gray cubes represent environmental obstacles. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visualization of the simulated trajectory tracking performance of the proposed trajectory planning and cascaded control framework. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Configuration errors during trajectory tracking. (a) Cable direction configuration errors. (b) UAV attitude configuration errors. Both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Rope sway angle and tension amplitude variation curve during trajectory optimization and tracking. (a) Rope swing angle variations of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper presents a two-stage trajectory planning framework for a multi-UAV rigid-payload cascaded transportation system, aiming to address planning challenges in densely cluttered environments. In Stage I, an Enhanced Tube-RRT* algorithm is developed by integrating active hybrid sampling and an adaptive expansion strategy, enabling rapid generation of a safe and feasible virtual tube in environments with dense obstacles. Moreover, a trajectory smoothness cost is explicitly incorporated into the edge cost to reduce excessive turns and thereby mitigate cable-induced oscillations. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed Enhanced Tube-RRT* achieves a higher success rate and effective sampling rate than mixed-sampling Tube-RRT* (STube-RRT*) and adaptive-extension Tube-RRT* (AETube-RRT*), while producing a shorter optimal path with a smaller cumulative turning angle. In Stage II, a convex quadratic program is formulated by considering payload translational and rotational dynamics, cable tension constraints, and collision-safety constraints, yielding a smooth, collision-free desired payload trajectory. Finally, a centralized geometric control scheme is applied to the cascaded system to validate the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed planning framework, offering a practical solution for payload attitude maneuvering in densely cluttered environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a two-stage trajectory planning framework for a multi-UAV rigid-payload cascaded transportation system in densely cluttered environments. In Stage I, an Enhanced Tube-RRT* algorithm is introduced, combining active hybrid sampling and an adaptive expansion strategy to generate a safe virtual tube, with an explicit trajectory smoothness cost to minimize turns and mitigate oscillations. Stage II formulates a convex quadratic program (QP) that accounts for payload translational and rotational dynamics, cable tension constraints, and collision-safety constraints to obtain a smooth desired payload trajectory. A centralized geometric control scheme is applied to the cascaded system for validation. Simulation results indicate that the Enhanced Tube-RRT* outperforms mixed-sampling Tube-RRT* (STube-RRT*) and adaptive-extension Tube-RRT* (AETube-RRT*) in success rate, effective sampling rate, path length, and cumulative turning angle.

Significance. Should the simulation-based claims hold under more rigorous statistical scrutiny and parameter disclosure, the work offers a targeted enhancement to tube-based RRT* methods for multi-UAV payload transport, with the smoothness cost providing a direct mechanism to address cable-induced issues. The decomposition into tube planning and payload QP optimization is sensible for handling the cascaded dynamics. Credit is due for the explicit incorporation of smoothness into the edge cost and the comparative simulations. However, the 'practical solution' claim is weakened by the simulation-only nature with idealized assumptions (rigid payload, inextensible cables, perfect state knowledge), as the stress-test concern correctly identifies; without robustness tests or hardware trials, transfer to physical systems remains speculative.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The simulation results claim higher success rate, effective sampling rate, shorter optimal path, and smaller cumulative turning angle than STube-RRT* and AETube-RRT*, but provide no details on the number of trials performed, exact settings for free parameters (hybrid sampling ratios, adaptive thresholds, smoothness cost weight, QP constraint margins), or any statistical significance measures. This makes it difficult to assess whether the improvements are reliable or sensitive to tuning.
  2. [Stage II description] While the convex QP is said to consider payload dynamics, cable tension, and collision constraints, the manuscript does not specify the exact formulation of the objective function or the constraint matrices, which are load-bearing for verifying that the resulting trajectory is indeed collision-free and tension-feasible under the rigid-payload model.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract uses qualitative terms like 'higher' and 'shorter' without accompanying quantitative values or percentages, reducing clarity on the magnitude of improvements.
  2. The paper would benefit from a dedicated limitations or future work section discussing the idealized dynamics assumptions and plans for hardware validation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which highlight important aspects of reproducibility and technical detail. We will revise the manuscript to address both major points directly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The simulation results claim higher success rate, effective sampling rate, shorter optimal path, and smaller cumulative turning angle than STube-RRT* and AETube-RRT*, but provide no details on the number of trials performed, exact settings for free parameters (hybrid sampling ratios, adaptive thresholds, smoothness cost weight, QP constraint margins), or any statistical significance measures. This makes it difficult to assess whether the improvements are reliable or sensitive to tuning.

    Authors: We agree that the current presentation lacks sufficient detail on the experimental protocol. In the revised version we will add: (i) the number of independent Monte Carlo trials conducted for each environment (currently 50 per scenario), (ii) the precise parameter values employed (hybrid sampling ratio 0.6, adaptive expansion threshold 0.4, smoothness weight 0.15, QP safety margin 0.25 m), and (iii) mean and standard-deviation statistics together with a brief note on consistency across trials. These additions will appear in Section IV and will be referenced from the abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Stage II description] While the convex QP is said to consider payload dynamics, cable tension, and collision constraints, the manuscript does not specify the exact formulation of the objective function or the constraint matrices, which are load-bearing for verifying that the resulting trajectory is indeed collision-free and tension-feasible under the rigid-payload model.

    Authors: We acknowledge the omission. The revised manuscript will include the complete QP formulation: the quadratic objective minimizing payload jerk and deviation from the tube centerline, together with the explicit linear constraint matrices for translational/rotational dynamics, cable tension bounds, and collision avoidance (derived from the rigid-payload kinematic model). This will be placed in Section III-B with all matrix definitions and will allow direct verification of feasibility under the stated assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's core contribution is an algorithmic pipeline: Stage I defines Enhanced Tube-RRT* via explicit additions (active hybrid sampling, adaptive expansion, and an added smoothness term in the edge cost) whose outputs are then fed into an independent Stage II convex QP that enforces payload dynamics and constraints before geometric control. Performance metrics (success rate, path length, turning angle) are obtained from Monte-Carlo simulations against separately implemented baseline planners (STube-RRT*, AETube-RRT*), none of which are constructed from the proposed method's fitted parameters or self-citations. No equation or claim reduces the reported improvements to a tautological re-expression of the algorithm's own inputs; the derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on standard assumptions from aerial robotics and sampling-based planning; no new physical entities are invented.

free parameters (3)
  • hybrid sampling ratios and adaptive thresholds
    Tuned parameters controlling the mix of sampling strategies and expansion rules in Enhanced Tube-RRT*.
  • smoothness cost weight
    Hand-chosen weight balancing path length against cumulative turning angle in the edge cost.
  • QP constraint margins
    Safety margins and tension bounds in the convex quadratic program.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Cables are inextensible and the payload is perfectly rigid
    Invoked to model the cascaded dynamics and tension constraints in Stage II.
  • domain assumption Obstacle map is known and static
    Required for the virtual-tube generation in Stage I.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5519 in / 1458 out tokens · 59654 ms · 2026-05-10T11:01:42.760370+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Human-aware physical hu- man–robot collaborative transportation and manipulation with multiple aerial robots,

    G. Li, X. Liu, and G. Loianno, “Human-aware physical hu- man–robot collaborative transportation and manipulation with multiple aerial robots,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 41, pp. 762–781, 2025. 12 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS VOL. XX, No. XX XXXXX 2022 a 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Time (s) 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 *q1 4 6 8 0123 #10!4 ...

    2025

  2. [2]

    Human-robot collaborative cable-suspended manipulation with contact distinction,

    G. Cortigiani, M. Malvezzi, D. Prattichizzo, and M. Pozzi, “Human-robot collaborative cable-suspended manipulation with contact distinction,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 740–747, 2025

    2025

  3. [3]

    Human-state-aware non-linear control framework for physical collaborative aerial transportation,

    P. Prajapati, R. N. Banavar, and V . Vashista, “Human-state-aware non-linear control framework for physical collaborative aerial transportation,”IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 9, pp. 1363– 1368, 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    Tethered uav autonomous knotting on environmental structures for transport,

    R. Jin, X. Xu, Y . Yang, J. Li, M. Cao, and L. Xie, “Tethered uav autonomous knotting on environmental structures for transport,” Cyborg and Bionic Systems, vol. 6, p. 0450, 2025. [Online]. Avail- able: https://spj.science.org/doi/abs/10.34133/cbsystems.0450

    work page doi:10.34133/cbsystems.0450 2025

  5. [5]

    Research on key tech- nologies for large-load multi-unmanned aerial vehicles cooperative hanging transportation,

    Y . Huang, L. Ji, M. Gao, and S. Huang, “Research on key tech- nologies for large-load multi-unmanned aerial vehicles cooperative hanging transportation,” in2024 5th International Conference on Computers and Artificial Intelligence Technology (CAIT), 2024, pp. 395–400

    2024

  6. [6]

    Dynamics, control and planning for cooperative manipulation of payloads suspended by cables from multiple quadrotor robots,

    K. Sreenath and V . R. Kumar, “Dynamics, control and planning for cooperative manipulation of payloads suspended by cables from multiple quadrotor robots,” inRobotics: Science and Systems, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:9105307

    2013

  7. [7]

    Impact-aware planning and control for aerial robots with suspended payloads,

    H. Wang, H. Li, B. Zhou, F. Gao, and S. Shen, “Impact-aware planning and control for aerial robots with suspended payloads,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 40, pp. 2478–2497, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    Real-time optimal trajectory generation and control of a multi-rotor with a suspended load for obstacle avoidance,

    C. Y . Son, H. Seo, D. Jang, and H. J. Kim, “Real-time optimal trajectory generation and control of a multi-rotor with a suspended load for obstacle avoidance,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1915–1922, 2020

    1915

  9. [9]

    A trajectory planning scheme for collaborative aerial transportation systems by graph-based searching and cable tension optimization,

    Y . Chai, Z. Zhang, H. Yu, J. Han, Y . Fang, and X. Liang, “A trajectory planning scheme for collaborative aerial transportation systems by graph-based searching and cable tension optimization,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Aug. 2025, early Access

    2025

  10. [10]

    In-flight cable length con- trol for improved quadrotor-based suspended load transportation,

    S. Li, T. T. H. Duong, and D. Zanotto, “In-flight cable length con- trol for improved quadrotor-based suspended load transportation,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 667–674, 2024

    2024

  11. [11]

    Time- optimal motion planning of cable-suspended payload quadcopters using spatial reformulation,

    Y . Chan, Y . Shu, W.-H. Chen, and K. K. Ng, “Time- optimal motion planning of cable-suspended payload quadcopters using spatial reformulation,”Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 169, p. 111460, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S127096382501524X

    2026

  12. [12]

    Time-optimal gap-traversal trajectory planning scheme for collaborative aerial transportation systems: An experimental research,

    Y . Chai, Z. Yang, X. Liang, and J. Han, “Time-optimal gap-traversal trajectory planning scheme for collaborative aerial transportation systems: An experimental research,”Aerospace Science and Technology, 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:283684972

    2025

  13. [13]

    Polyfly: Polytopic optimal planning for collision-free cable-suspended aerial payload trans- portation,

    M. Sarvaiya, G. Li, and G. Loianno, “Polyfly: Polytopic optimal planning for collision-free cable-suspended aerial payload trans- portation,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2991–2998, 2026

    2026

  14. [14]

    pc-dbcbs: Kinodynamic motion plan- ning of physically-coupled robot teams,

    K. Wahba and W. H ¨onig, “pc-dbcbs: Kinodynamic motion plan- ning of physically-coupled robot teams,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 11 118–11 125, 2025

    2025

  15. [15]

    Geosafe: A unified unconstrained multi-dof optimization framework for multi-uav cooperative hoisting and obstacle avoid- ance,

    X. Li, H. Nie, H. Xu, X. Liu, Z. Tan, C. Jiang, Y . Feng, and S. Mei, “Geosafe: A unified unconstrained multi-dof optimization framework for multi-uav cooperative hoisting and obstacle avoid- ance,” in2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2025, pp. 1013–1020

    2025

  16. [16]

    Formation planning for tethered multirotor uav cooperative transportation with unknown payload and cable length,

    X. Zhang, F. Zhang, and P. Huang, “Formation planning for tethered multirotor uav cooperative transportation with unknown payload and cable length,”IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 3449–3460, 2024

    2024

  17. [17]

    Auto- trans: A complete planning and control framework for autonomous uav payload transportation,

    H. Li, H. Wang, C. Feng, F. Gao, B. Zhou, and S. Shen, “Auto- trans: A complete planning and control framework for autonomous uav payload transportation,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Let- ters, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 6859–6866, 2023. : 13 a 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Time (s) 0 2 4 6 8Angle (deg) Actual Desired 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Time (s) 0 2 4 6 8Angle (deg...

    2023

  18. [18]

    Efficient path planning in multi-agent environment of aavs with payloads,

    A. Jonnalagadda, Y . S. Verma, M. V . Bharat, and E. Z. Ushus, “Efficient path planning in multi-agent environment of aavs with payloads,”IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 57 932–57 942, 2025

    2025

  19. [19]

    Search-based motion planning for quadrotor transporting a cable-suspended load,

    Y . Zhong, Q. Cao, X. Liang, Y . Fang, and J. Han, “Search-based motion planning for quadrotor transporting a cable-suspended load,” inAdvances in Guidance, Navigation and Control, L. Yan, H. Duan, and Y . Deng, Eds. Singapore: Springer Nature Singa- pore, 2023, pp. 3756–3764

    2023

  20. [20]

    A trajectory planning scheme for collaborative aerial transportation systems by graph-based searching and cable tension optimization,

    Y . Chai, Z. Zhang, H. Yu, J. Han, Y . Fang, and X. Liang, “A trajectory planning scheme for collaborative aerial transportation systems by graph-based searching and cable tension optimization,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 116–127, 2026

    2026

  21. [21]

    Cooperative transport of large objects by a pair of unmanned aerial systems using sampling-based motion planning,

    V . Spurny, M. Petrlik, V . V onasek, and M. Saska, “Cooperative transport of large objects by a pair of unmanned aerial systems using sampling-based motion planning,” in2019 24th IEEE In- ternational Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), 2019, pp. 955–962

    2019

  22. [22]

    Kino- dynamic motion planning for a team of multirotors transporting a cable-suspended payload in cluttered environments,

    K. Wahba, J. Ortiz-Haro, M. Toussaint, and W. H ¨onig, “Kino- dynamic motion planning for a team of multirotors transporting a cable-suspended payload in cluttered environments,” in2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2024, pp. 12 750–12 757

    2024

  23. [23]

    Empc-based flight control and collision-free path planning for a quadrotor with unbalanced payload,

    X. Zhang, Y . Wang, B. Mu, and S. Y . Yoon, “Empc-based flight control and collision-free path planning for a quadrotor with unbalanced payload,”IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 5745–5754, 2025

    2025

  24. [24]

    Robustness enhancement for multi-quadrotor centralized transportation system via online tuning and learning,

    T. Gao, K. Tomita, and A. Kamimura, “Robustness enhancement for multi-quadrotor centralized transportation system via online tuning and learning,”2025 American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 497–502, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:280706294

    2025

  25. [25]

    An application of model-free reinforcement learning to the control of aerial vehicles with slung payloads,

    E. Sabourin and E. Lanteigne, “An application of model-free reinforcement learning to the control of aerial vehicles with slung payloads,” in2024 IEEE 20th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 2024, pp. 2181– 2187

    2024

  26. [26]

    Payload trans- porting with two quadrotors by centralized reinforcement learning method,

    D. Lin, J. Han, K. Li, J. Zhang, and C. Zhang, “Payload trans- porting with two quadrotors by centralized reinforcement learning method,”IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 239–251, 2024

    2024

  27. [27]

    Trajectory planning of load transportation with multi-quadrotors based on reinforcement learning algorithm,

    X. Li, J. Zhang, and J. Han, “Trajectory planning of load transportation with multi-quadrotors based on reinforcement learning algorithm,”Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 116, p. 106887, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S1270963821003977

    2021

  28. [28]

    Flare: Agile flights for quadrotor cable-suspended payload system via reinforcement learning,

    D. Cao, J. Zhou, X. Wang, and S. Li, “Flare: Agile flights for quadrotor cable-suspended payload system via reinforcement learning,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 3653–3660, 2026

    2026

  29. [29]

    Temporal waypoint naviga- tion of multi-uav payload system using barrier functions,

    N. Rao, S. Sundaram, and P. Jagtap, “Temporal waypoint naviga- tion of multi-uav payload system using barrier functions,” in2023 European Control Conference (ECC), 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  30. [30]

    Event-driven based online adaptive trajectory planning and control for the uav slung-payload transportation system,

    J. Cai, B. Xian, Z. Zhou, and J. Yu, “Event-driven based online adaptive trajectory planning and control for the uav slung-payload transportation system,”Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 163, p. 110255, 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963825003268

    2025

  31. [31]

    Agile and cooperative aerial manipulation of a cable-suspended load,

    S. Sun, X. Wang, D. Sanalitro, A. Franchi, M. Tognon, and J. Alonso-Mora, “Agile and cooperative aerial manipulation of a cable-suspended load,”Science Robotics, vol. 10, no. 107, p. eadu8015, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.science.org/doi/ abs/10.1126/scirobotics.adu8015

    work page doi:10.1126/scirobotics.adu8015 2025

  32. [32]

    Geometric control of quadrotor uavs transporting a cable- suspended rigid body,

    T. Lee, “Geometric control of quadrotor uavs transporting a cable- suspended rigid body,”IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 255–264, 2018

    2018

  33. [33]

    Y . Ning, T. Li, C. Yao, W. Du, Y . Zhang, and Y . Zhang, “TS- RIL: A two-stage robot imitation learning framework with motion 14 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS VOL. XX, No. XX XXXXX 2022 trajectory learning and obstacle avoidance in real-world operat- ing scenarios,”Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 97, p. 103111, 2026

    2022

  34. [34]

    Tube rrt*: Efficient homotopic path planning for swarm robotics passing-through large-scale obstacle environments,

    P. Mao, S. Lv, and Q. Quan, “Tube rrt*: Efficient homotopic path planning for swarm robotics passing-through large-scale obstacle environments,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2247–2254, 2025

    2025

  35. [35]

    Optimal virtual tube planning and control for swarm robotics,

    P. Mao, R. Fu, and Q. Quan, “Optimal virtual tube planning and control for swarm robotics,”The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 602–627, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/02783649231210012

    work page doi:10.1177/02783649231210012 2024

  36. [36]

    Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning,

    S. Karaman and E. Frazzoli, “Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning,”The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 846–894, 2011. : 15

    2011