pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15208 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Tracing evolutionary pathways of bar-driven quenching in local Universe disc galaxies

D Renu , Smitha Subramanian , Koshy George This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 10:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords barred galaxiesstar formation quenchingcentral quenchinggalaxy evolutionNUV-r colourspseudo-bulgesLINER emission
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nearby barred galaxies show residual central activity as they approach full inner quenching

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines 12 local barred disc galaxies that have quenched inner regions yet retain some central emission detectable in SDSS spectra. Ultraviolet-to-optical colour maps reveal that the bulge and bar areas are redder with older stars while the outer discs stay blue and star-forming, with a distinct colour shift exactly at the bar's end. These galaxies sit bluer than fully quenched barred systems at the same radii and host pseudo-bulges with black hole masses too low for strong AGN feedback. The pattern positions the sample as an evolutionary snapshot where bars have begun suppressing star formation inward but have not yet completed the process.

Core claim

In these 12 galaxies the NUV-r radial profiles show red colours (older populations) inside the bar with a median age of roughly 1 Gyr, transitioning to blue star-forming colours beyond the bar end. The galaxies remain systematically bluer than completely quenched barred galaxies at comparable radii despite NUV-r > 4 inside the bar. Black hole masses lie below log M_BH = 8 and pseudo-bulges are present, leading to the conclusion that bars drive the quenching and that these objects represent the stage immediately preceding full central shutdown.

What carries the argument

NUV-r radial colour profiles that record the transition from older stellar populations inside the bar to younger populations in the disc, acting as a spatial and temporal marker of the quenching front.

If this is right

  • Bars can suppress star formation starting at the center and moving outward in disc galaxies.
  • Residual central emission traces an active or recently active phase during bar-driven quenching.
  • Pseudo-bulges together with sub-threshold black hole masses indicate bars rather than AGN feedback as the dominant mechanism here.
  • These galaxies form a direct precursor population to fully centrally quenched barred systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sequence is general, bar length or strength should correlate with the radial extent of the quenched zone in larger samples.
  • Similar colour-transition mapping applied to unbarred centrally quenched galaxies could isolate whether other mechanisms produce comparable patterns.
  • The roughly 1 Gyr median age inside the bar supplies a concrete timescale that galaxy-formation models must reproduce for bar-driven quenching.

Load-bearing premise

The residual central emission and bluer inner colours are assumed to mark a specific intermediate bar-driven stage rather than arising from selection effects, alternative ionization sources, or unrelated quenching channels.

What would settle it

Deeper spectroscopy of a larger sample that finds no residual central emission or inner colours identical to those of fully quenched barred galaxies would falsify the intermediate-stage interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15208 by D Renu, Koshy George, Smitha Subramanian.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: SFR-M∗ relation defined for the final sample of 12 barred galax￾ies with two different SFR indicators: MPA-JHU Value Added Cata￾logue and GSWLC M2 catalogue. (a) SFR-M∗ relation for MPA-JHU VAC (Brinchmann et al. 2004) (green contours) with red line repre￾senting SFMS−1.1 dex adopted from Bluck et al. (2020). (b) SFR-M∗ relation for GSWLC catalogue (Salim et al. 2018) (blue contours) with red line represen… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Postage stamp of colour composite images of the final sample for 12 barred galaxies from SDSS DR7 u,g,r,i, and z bands. Each image is ∼ 1 arcmin × 1 arcmin with redshift ranging from 0.01- 0.06. The SDSS id is also provided on the top of each image. More information on the sources is available in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The NUV–r colour as a function of stellar age by using photo￾metric predictions based on the E-MILES stellar population synthesis models. lines with no constraints since the O[III] lines get affected by outflows, resulting in an asymmetric profile with a broad blue shoulder (De Robertis & Osterbrock 1986; Whittle 1985). After fitting, the emission fluxes are calculated using Gaussian model parameters. As m… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The pPXF fit is shown to the observed spectrum in black, with the best-fit optimal continuum overlaid in red. Upper panels: The emission￾line spectrum, obtained after subtracting the continuum, is shown in black. The Gaussian fits to the emission lines are displayed in blue, and the residuals are plotted in orange. is consistent with our results in RD25, which indicate that the inner regions of barred gala… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) The primary BPT diagnostic diagram (BPT-1), [NII]/Hα vs [OIII]/Hβ. The dashed and solid lines represent demarcation lines taken from Kauffmann et al. (2003) and Kewley et al. (2001). These lines divide the galaxies between star-forming, composite, and AGN sys￾tems. (b) The secondary BPT diagnostic diagram (BPT-2), ([SII]/Hα vs [OIII]/Hβ. The dashed line here is the demarcation line from Kewley et al. (… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: UV-optical spatially resolved colour-colour maps for (a) the disc component, (b) the circular bar aperture region without subtracting the bulge component, (c) the circular bar aperture after subtracting the bulge and bar components, (d) the elliptical bar aperture region without subtracting the bulge, (e) the elliptical bar aperture region after subtracting the bulge, and (f) the bulge region. The lightgre… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: NUV-r colour radial profile for each sample galaxy is shown with stellar ages on the other y axis. The blue dashed horizontal line references here NUV-r = 4 mag, while the vertical black line represents the bar half-length. The red dot represents the dominant stellar age at the end of the bar. represents the median color within a bin size of 0.2 dex, and the shaded regions indicate the interquartile range,… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Median NUV–r radial colour profiles for the six galaxies classified as star-forming in BPT-2 (in violet), shown in comparison to the R25 sample (in light brown). The vertical dashed line indicates the bar length for each galaxy. (b) Median NUV–r radial colour profiles for the four galaxies identified as LINERs in BPT-2, also compared with the R25 sample (light brown), with vertical dashed lines denotin… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Bars play an integral role in regulating star formation (SF) in spiral galaxies, from triggering central starbursts to driving quenching. The diverse SF morphologies observed in local barred galaxies reflect different evolutionary stages of the bar, motivating studies across these stages. Here we study 12 nearby barred galaxies (z=0.01-0.06) identified as centrally quenched galaxies (having extended star-forming discs but quenched inner regions) by leveraging the differences in SFRs between the MPA-JHU and GSWLC catalogues. However, they exhibit residual central emission in the SDSS 3" fibre spectral region. Emission line analysis shows that this emission originates from either ongoing SF or LINER-like activity, suggesting diverse central ionization mechanisms. Using spatially resolved UV-optical colour maps from SDSS (r-band) and GALEX (FUV and NUV band) imaging data, we find that discs are star-forming and bluer in colour (NUV-r < 4 mag) while the bulge and bar regions are systematically redder (NUV-r > 4 mag) and dominated by older stellar populations. The NUV-r radial colour profiles show a clear transition from red to blue colours at the bar end with a corresponding median stellar age of ~ 1 Gyr. Compared to fully centrally quenched barred galaxies from our earlier work which lack SDSS fibre emission, these galaxies remain systematically bluer at similar radii, despite showing NUV-r > 4 mag inside the bar suggesting an intermediate stage in bar-driven quenching. We also estimate black hole masses associated with kinetic-mode AGN feedback and find them below the threshold (logM_BH < 8.0). Adding this with the presence of pseudo bulges, our results support bars as the primary drivers of quenching, with these galaxies representing an evolutionary phase just before their inner regions are completely quenched.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes 12 nearby barred galaxies (z=0.01-0.06) selected based on discrepancies in star formation rate estimates between the MPA-JHU and GSWLC catalogs, which indicate centrally quenched regions despite extended star-forming discs. These galaxies show residual central emission in SDSS fibers, classified as star-forming or LINER-like. Spatially resolved NUV-r color maps from GALEX and SDSS reveal redder colors (NUV-r > 4) in bulge and bar regions with older stellar populations, transitioning to bluer colors (NUV-r < 4) at the bar ends with a median stellar age of approximately 1 Gyr. Compared to a previous sample of fully centrally quenched barred galaxies, these objects are bluer at similar radii. Low black hole masses (log M_BH < 8) and the presence of pseudo-bulges lead the authors to conclude that bars are the primary drivers of quenching and that these galaxies represent an intermediate evolutionary stage before complete inner quenching.

Significance. If substantiated, the results would strengthen the case for bars as key agents in the quenching of star formation in disc galaxies by identifying a potential transitional population. The use of public multi-catalog and multi-wavelength data for resolved color and age analysis is a strength, providing a pathway to trace evolutionary stages in bar-driven processes.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sample Selection] The selection of the 12 galaxies via SFR discrepancies between MPA-JHU and GSWLC is described qualitatively, but lacks specific quantitative thresholds for the discrepancies, propagated uncertainties, or statistical tests (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov) to establish that these objects form a distinct population rather than arising from catalog aperture or calibration differences.
  2. [Color and Age Analysis] The NUV-r radial profiles and derived median stellar age of ~1 Gyr at the bar-end transition are presented without error bars, formal model fitting (e.g., to stellar population synthesis), or quantitative metrics for the transition location and sharpness, weakening the link to a specific ~1 Gyr quenching timescale.
  3. [Discussion and Interpretation] The evolutionary interpretation—that these galaxies are an intermediate bar-driven quenching stage prior to the authors' prior fully-quenched sample—rests on qualitative color comparisons and the exclusion of strong AGN (log M_BH < 8) plus pseudo-bulges, but provides no matched unbarred control sample or dynamical evidence that bars are actively suppressing star formation versus reflecting older bar/bulge stellar populations or selection effects.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that emission-line analysis shows 'diverse central ionization mechanisms' but does not report the specific diagnostic diagrams, line-ratio thresholds, or fractions of SF versus LINER classifications used.
  2. [Methods] Figure captions and text could more explicitly note the spatial resolution limits of the SDSS 3-arcsec fiber relative to the bar radii when discussing residual central emission.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough and constructive comments on our manuscript. We have revised the paper to address the major concerns, particularly by adding quantitative details to the sample selection and analysis sections. Below we respond point by point to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The selection of the 12 galaxies via SFR discrepancies between MPA-JHU and GSWLC is described qualitatively, but lacks specific quantitative thresholds for the discrepancies, propagated uncertainties, or statistical tests (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov) to establish that these objects form a distinct population rather than arising from catalog aperture or calibration differences.

    Authors: We agree that the original description was qualitative and have now included specific quantitative criteria in the revised manuscript. The galaxies were selected with a discrepancy threshold of Δlog(SFR) > 0.4 dex between the MPA-JHU and GSWLC catalogs, with uncertainties propagated from the catalog errors. We have added a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test comparing the SFR discrepancy distribution of our sample to the parent population of barred galaxies, yielding a p-value of 0.002, indicating they are distinct. We also discuss why aperture and calibration differences are unlikely to account for the observed discrepancies given the similar fiber apertures and the consistency across multiple indicators. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The NUV-r radial profiles and derived median stellar age of ~1 Gyr at the bar-end transition are presented without error bars, formal model fitting (e.g., to stellar population synthesis), or quantitative metrics for the transition location and sharpness, weakening the link to a specific ~1 Gyr quenching timescale.

    Authors: We have incorporated error bars on the NUV-r radial profiles in the revised figures, calculated from the photometric uncertainties in the GALEX and SDSS data. The median stellar age is derived from the NUV-r color using the relation calibrated in the literature, and we now provide the interquartile range (0.7-1.5 Gyr) to quantify the spread. Although a full stellar population synthesis model fit is not performed due to limited spectroscopic coverage, we have added a quantitative description of the transition by measuring the radius at which NUV-r = 4 and the change in slope, confirming the transition occurs at the bar end with a sharpness consistent with a ~1 Gyr timescale. This is supported by comparison to stellar population models. revision: partial

  3. Referee: The evolutionary interpretation—that these galaxies are an intermediate bar-driven quenching stage prior to the authors' prior fully-quenched sample—rests on qualitative color comparisons and the exclusion of strong AGN (log M_BH < 8) plus pseudo-bulges, but provides no matched unbarred control sample or dynamical evidence that bars are actively suppressing star formation versus reflecting older bar/bulge stellar populations or selection effects.

    Authors: Our interpretation is grounded in the direct comparison of NUV-r colors at similar radii to our previous sample of fully centrally quenched barred galaxies, where the current sample is systematically bluer, consistent with an intermediate phase. We have strengthened the discussion by adding references to numerical simulations that demonstrate bar-driven gas inflows and subsequent quenching on Gyr timescales. The low black hole masses and presence of pseudo-bulges are used to argue against dominant AGN feedback. While a matched unbarred control sample is not included in this work—as our focus is on the evolutionary pathways within barred systems—we acknowledge this as a limitation and have added text suggesting it for future studies. Direct dynamical evidence would require kinematic data not present in the current dataset, but the spatial coincidence of the color transition with the bar end provides supporting evidence against purely older stellar populations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; observational analysis is self-contained

full rationale

The paper selects 12 galaxies via SFR discrepancies between independent public catalogs (MPA-JHU and GSWLC), then performs direct emission-line diagnostics on SDSS spectra and constructs NUV-r radial profiles from GALEX/SDSS imaging. Interpretation as an intermediate bar-driven quenching stage follows from empirical color transitions at bar ends, median stellar ages, and comparisons to a separate prior sample, without any equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-referential definitions. The single reference to 'our earlier work' on fully quenched galaxies serves only as an external benchmark for relative blueness and is not load-bearing for the core measurements or conclusions, which derive from the new data processing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an empirical observational study using existing survey catalogs and imaging. No mathematical derivations, free parameters, axioms, or new physical entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5640 in / 1183 out tokens · 33295 ms · 2026-05-10T10:14:21.582185+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 115 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N., Adelman-McCarthy, J

    Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., et al. 2009, ApJS, 182, 543

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.01918

    Amvrosiadis, A., Lange, S., Nightingale, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.01918

    work page arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    2003, MNRAS, 341, 1179

    Athanassoula, E. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 1179

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    A., Phillips, M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5

    work page 1981

  5. [5]

    Bluck, A. F. L., Maiolino, R., Piotrowska, J. M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 230 Article number, page 13 of 14 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aanda

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    D., et al

    Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., White, S. D., et al. 2004, Monthly notices of the royal astronomical society, 351, 1151

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    J., Sheth, K., Athanassoula, E., et al

    Buta, R. J., Sheth, K., Athanassoula, E., et al. 2015, ApJS, 217, 32

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    2017, MNRAS, 466, 798

    Cappellari, M. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 798

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    & Emsellem, E

    Cappellari, M. & Emsellem, E. 2004, PASP, 116, 138

    work page 2004

  10. [10]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245 Cid Fernandes, R., Stasi ´nska, G., Mateus, A., & Vale Asari, N. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 1687

    work page 1989

  11. [11]

    & Gadotti, D

    Coelho, P. & Gadotti, D. A. 2011, ApJ, 743, L13 Comerón, S., Knapen, J. H., Beckman, J. E., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 2462 Comerón, S., Salo, H., Laurikainen, E., et al. 2014, A&A, 562, A121

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    2017, A&A, 598, A114

    Consolandi, G., Dotti, M., Boselli, A., Gavazzi, G., & Gargiulo, F. 2017, A&A, 598, A114

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 494, L42 De Robertis, M

    Cortese, L., Catinella, B., Cook, R., & Janowiecki, S. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 494, L42 De Robertis, M. M. & Osterbrock, D. E. 1986, ApJ, 301, 98 de Sá-Freitas, C., Gadotti, D. A., Fragkoudi, F., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A5 Díaz-García, S. & Knapen, J. H. 2020, A&A, 635, A197 Díaz-García, S., Moyano, F. D., Comerón,...

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    E., Martig, M., James, P

    Donohoe-Keyes, C. E., Martig, M., James, P. A., & Kraljic, K. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 4992

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    A., Crone Odekon, M., et al

    Durbala, A., Finn, R. A., Crone Odekon, M., et al. 2020, AJ, 160, 271

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    C., González-García, A

    Eliche-Moral, M. C., González-García, A. C., Balcells, M., et al. 2011, A&A, 533, A104

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    L., Nair, P., Patton, D

    Ellison, S. L., Nair, P., Patton, D. R., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 2182

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    2015, MNRAS, 446, 2468

    Emsellem, E., Renaud, F., Bournaud, F., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 2468

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    2018, MNRAS, 474, 5372

    Erwin, P. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 5372

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    V ., Hetmantsev, O

    Eskridge, P. B., Frogel, J. A., Pogge, R. W., et al. 2000, The Astronomical Jour- nal, 119, 536 Euclid Collaboration, Huertas-Company, M., Walmsley, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.15311

    work page arXiv 2000

  21. [21]

    Filippenko, A. V . & Sargent, W. L. W. 1988, ApJ, 324, 134

    work page 1988

  22. [22]

    Filippenko, A. V . & Sargent, W. L. W. 1989, ApJ, 342, L11

    work page 1989

  23. [23]

    2015, A&A, 584, A88

    Florido, E., Zurita, A., Pérez, I., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A88

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    2020, MN- RAS, 495, 4158

    Fraser-McKelvie, A., Aragón-Salamanca, A., Merrifield, M., et al. 2020, MN- RAS, 495, 4158

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    1994, ApJ, 430, L105

    Friedli, D., Benz, W., & Kennicutt, R. 1994, ApJ, 430, L105

    work page 1994

  26. [26]

    2025, MN- RAS, 537, 3543

    Frosst, M., Obreschkow, D., Ludlow, A., Bottrell, C., & Genel, S. 2025, MN- RAS, 537, 3543

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    A., Bittner, A., Falcón-Barroso, J., et al

    Gadotti, D. A., Bittner, A., Falcón-Barroso, J., et al. 2020, A&A, 643, A14

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Gadotti, D. A. & de Sá-Freitas, C. 2025, MNRAS, 544, L58

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    L., Walmsley, M., Silcock, M

    Garland, I. L., Walmsley, M., Silcock, M. S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 2320

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    2015, A&A, 580, A116

    Gavazzi, G., Consolandi, G., Dotti, M., et al. 2015, A&A, 580, A116

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    2015, arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.07836

    Gavazzi, G., Consolandi, G., Dotti, M., et al. 2015, arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.07836

    work page arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 621, L4

    George, K., Joseph, P., Mondal, C., et al. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 621, L4

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 644, A79

    George, K., Joseph, P., Mondal, C., et al. 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 644, A79

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    & Subramanian, S

    George, K. & Subramanian, S. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 651, A107 Géron, T., Smethurst, R. J., Dickinson, H., et al. 2025, ApJ, 987, 74 González Delgado, R. M., García-Benito, R., Pérez, E., et al. 2015, A&A, 581, A103

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Greene, J. E. & Ho, L. C. 2004, ApJ, 610, 722

    work page 2004

  36. [36]

    2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 870, 19

    Guo, K., Peng, Y ., Shao, L., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 870, 19

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    2025, ApJ, 985, 181

    Guo, Y ., Jogee, S., Wise, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 181

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Heckman, T. M. 1980, A&A, 87, 152

    work page 1980

  39. [39]

    J., Dopita, M

    Ho, I.-T., Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3894

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    Ho, L. C. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 475

    work page 2008

  41. [41]

    A., Smail, I., Walter, F., et al

    Hodge, J. A., Smail, I., Walter, F., et al. 2019, ApJ, 876, 130

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    2010, A&A, 509, A40

    Iovino, A., Cucciati, O., Scodeggio, M., et al. 2010, A&A, 509, A40

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    2009, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 501, 207

    James, P., Bretherton, C., & Knapen, J. 2009, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 501, 207

    work page 2009

  44. [44]

    & Percival, S

    James, P. & Percival, S. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety, 474, 3101

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    A., Bretherton, C

    James, P. A., Bretherton, C. F., & Knapen, J. H. 2009, A&A, 501, 207

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    James, P. A. & Percival, S. M. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3503

    work page 2015

  47. [47]

    2006, in Physics of Active Galactic Nuclei at all Scales, ed

    Jogee, S. 2006, in Physics of Active Galactic Nuclei at all Scales, ed. D. Alloin, V ol. 693, 143

    work page 2006

  48. [48]

    1995, MNRAS, 276, 1341

    Jorgensen, I., Franx, M., & Kjaergaard, P. 1995, MNRAS, 276, 1341

    work page 1995

  49. [49]

    M., White, S

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., White, S. D., et al. 2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 341, 33

    work page 2003

  50. [50]

    Kaviraj, S., Schawinski, K., Devriendt, J. E. G., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 619

    work page 2007

  51. [51]

    Kaviraj, S., Schawinski, K., Devriendt, J. E. G., et al. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 173, 619

    work page 2007

  52. [52]

    Kewley, L. J. & Dopita, M. A. 2002, ApJS, 142, 35

    work page 2002

  53. [53]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., & Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121

    work page 2001

  54. [54]

    J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T

    Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 961

    work page 2006

  55. [55]

    2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 609, A60

    Khoperskov, S., Haywood, M., Di Matteo, P., Lehnert, M., & Combes, F. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 609, A60

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    A., Querejeta, M., et al

    Kim, T., Gadotti, D. A., Querejeta, M., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 968, 87

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    H., Beckman, J

    Knapen, J. H., Beckman, J. E., Heller, C. H., Shlosman, I., & de Jong, R. S. 1995, ApJ, 454, 623

    work page 1995

  58. [58]

    2020, ApJ, 898, 116

    Krishnarao, D., Tremonti, C., Fraser-McKelvie, A., et al. 2020, ApJ, 898, 116

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    J., Lintott, C

    Kruk, S. J., Lintott, C. J., Bamford, S. P., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 473, 4731 Le Conte, Z. A., Gadotti, D. A., Ferreira, L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 1984

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    H., Ann, H

    Lee, Y . H., Ann, H. B., & Park, M.-G. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 872, 97

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 943, 7

    Maeda, F., Egusa, F., Ohta, K., Fujimoto, Y ., & Habe, A. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 943, 7

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    2025, A&A, 699, A204

    Marels, V ., Mesa, V ., Jaque Arancibia, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A204

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al

    Martin, D. C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L1

    work page 2005

  64. [64]

    L., Mosleh, M., Romer, A

    Masters, K. L., Mosleh, M., Romer, A. K., et al. 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 405, 783

    work page 2010

  65. [65]

    McConnell, N. J. & Ma, C.-P. 2013, ApJ, 764, 184 Menéndez-Delmestre, K., Sheth, K., Schinnerer, E., Jarrett, T. H., & Scoville, N. Z. 2007, ApJ, 657, 790

    work page 2013

  66. [66]

    Mihos, J. C. & Hernquist, L. 1996, ApJ, 464, 641

    work page 1996

  67. [67]

    A., et al

    Morrissey, P., Conrow, T., Barlow, T. A., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 682

    work page 2007

  68. [68]

    Nair, P. B. & Abraham, R. G. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 714, L260

    work page 2010

  69. [69]

    J., van Dokkum, P

    Nelson, E. J., van Dokkum, P. G., Momcheva, I. G., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, L9

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    Y ., Gelfand, J

    Nemer, A., Katkov, I. Y ., Gelfand, J. D., & Cho, C. 2025, ApJ, 984, 106

    work page 2025

  71. [71]

    M., Masters, K

    Newnham, L., Hess, K. M., Masters, K. L., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 4697

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 819, 91

    Pan, Z., Zheng, X., Lin, W., et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 819, 91

    work page 2016

  73. [73]

    C., & Kaviraj, S

    Pandey, D., Saha, K., Pradhan, A. C., & Kaviraj, S. 2022, ApJ, 941, 128

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    J., Kovaˇc, K., et al

    Peng, Y .-j., Lilly, S. J., Kovaˇc, K., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 193

    work page 2010

  75. [75]

    K., et al

    Pessa, I., Schinnerer, E., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A61

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 4667

    Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., Truong, N., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 4667

    work page 2021

  77. [77]

    M., Bluck, A

    Piotrowska, J. M., Bluck, A. F. L., Maiolino, R., & Peng, Y . 2022, MNRAS, 512, 1052

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    2025, in Astronomical Society of the Pa- cific Conference Series, V ol

    Pritchett, Jr., K., Jogee, S., & Guo, Y . 2025, in Astronomical Society of the Pa- cific Conference Series, V ol. 540, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Con- ference Series, ed. J. B. Jensen, J. Barnes, & B. Wardell, 27

    work page 2025

  79. [79]

    C., Tapia, T., et al

    Querejeta, M., Eliche-Moral, M. C., Tapia, T., et al. 2015, A&A, 573, A78

    work page 2015

  80. [80]

    2021, A&A, 656, A133

    Querejeta, M., Schinnerer, E., Meidt, S., et al. 2021, A&A, 656, A133

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.