arxiv: 2604.15798 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · physics.plasm-ph

Recognition: unknown

Induced Scattering of Strong Waves in Pair Plasmas

Masanori Iwamoto , Kunihito Ioka

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE physics.plasm-ph

keywords induced scatteringpair plasmasfast radio burstsstrong electromagnetic wavesparticle-in-cell simulationsmagnetar windsnonlinearity parameter

0 comments

The pith

The linear analysis of induced scattering applies to strong waves in pair plasmas when plasma motion provides a Lorentz boost, with saturation set by the wave-to-plasma energy ratio.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that induced scattering of strong electromagnetic waves in pair plasmas follows the predictions of conventional linear theory even when wave amplitudes exceed unity, once the Lorentz boost arising from plasma motion inside the wave is included. This result matters because fast radio bursts must cross dense pair plasmas in magnetar winds without being scattered away, and the work shows under what conditions that escape is possible. The authors first derive the steady-state solutions for linearly polarized waves of arbitrary strength and identify that nonlinearity is controlled by the parameter a0 times the plasma frequency divided by the wave frequency, rather than by amplitude alone. One-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations then evolve these solutions from the linear regime and confirm that scattering saturates at a level fixed by the ratio of wave energy to plasma energy, so that the wave remains essentially unscattered when that ratio greatly exceeds one.

Core claim

We revisit the steady-state solution of linearly polarized electromagnetic waves in pair plasmas with arbitrary amplitude and demonstrate that the nonlinearity is characterized by the nonlinearity parameter a0 ωpe/ω0 rather than the dimensionless amplitude a0. We follow the time evolution of the steady-state solution for the linear regime a0 ωpe/ω0 ≪ 1 by performing one-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations, and show that the conventional linear analysis of induced scattering assuming a0 ≪ 1 is applicable even for a0 > 1 when the Lorentz boost due to the plasma motion in the incident wave is considered. The saturation level is controlled by a0 ω0/ωpe, which corresponds to the ratio of the

What carries the argument

The nonlinearity parameter a0 ω_pe / ω_0 that governs steady-state wave solutions in pair plasmas and permits extension of linear induced-scattering analysis to large amplitudes through the plasma Lorentz boost.

Load-bearing premise

One-dimensional simulations initialized in the linear regime accurately capture the saturation behavior of strong waves and apply directly to three-dimensional inhomogeneous magnetar wind environments.

What would settle it

A three-dimensional particle-in-cell simulation initialized with a0 > 1 and a0 ω0/ωpe ≫ 1 that exhibits strong induced scattering would falsify the applicability of the linear analysis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15798 by Kunihito Ioka, Masanori Iwamoto.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Enlarged view of the initial spatial profile of labo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time evolution of the power spectrum of the Poynting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Time evolution of the Poynting flux [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Maximum growth rate (top) and corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Time evolution of the incident Poynting flux [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Time evolution of the longitudinal four velocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We study induced (stimulated) scattering of linearly polarized, strong electromagnetic waves in pair plasmas, which is crucial for understanding the propagation of fast radio bursts (FRBs). Magnetars are the most promising progenitors of FRBs, and FRBs propagate through the magnetar wind and successfully escape before being significantly scattered. We revisit the steady-state solution of linearly polarized electromagnetic waves in pair plasmas with arbitrary amplitude, and demonstrate that the nonlinearity is characterized by the nonlinearity parameter $a_0\omega_{pe}/\omega_0$ rather than the dimensionless amplitude $a_0$, where $\omega_{pe}$ is the electron plasma frequency and $\omega_0$ is the wave frequency. We follow the time evolution of the steady-state solution for the linear regime $a_0\omega_{pe}/\omega_0 \ll 1$ by performing one-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations, and show that the conventional linear analysis of induced scattering assuming $a_0 \ll 1$ is applicable even for $a_0 > 1$ when the Lorentz boost due to the plasma motion in the incident wave is considered. The saturation level is controlled by $a_0\omega_0/\omega_{pe}$, which corresponds to the ratio of the wave energy to the plasma energy, and the incident wave is hardly scattered for $a_0\omega_0/\omega_{pe} \gg 1$. We discuss the application of our results to FRBs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper re-derives the nonlinearity parameter for induced scattering as a0 ωpe/ω0 and claims linear formulas still apply for a0>1 via Lorentz boost, but the 1D PIC runs only initialize the weak regime so the strong-wave extrapolation stays analytic.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this work gives a cleaner scaling for when strong waves in pair plasmas avoid significant induced scattering: saturation tracks the wave-to-plasma energy ratio a0 ω0/ωpe, and the incident wave propagates with little loss once that ratio exceeds order unity. They show the usual a0 ≪ 1 assumption can be relaxed after including the plasma's Lorentz motion in the wave frame. That reframes the FRB escape problem in magnetar winds without needing new nonlinear machinery for every amplitude.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper revisits the steady-state solution for linearly polarized electromagnetic waves of arbitrary amplitude in pair plasmas and argues that the effective nonlinearity is governed by the parameter a0 ω_pe/ω0 rather than a0 alone. It performs 1D PIC simulations initialized from the linear-regime steady state (a0 ω_pe/ω0 ≪ 1) and claims that the conventional linear induced-scattering analysis remains valid for a0 > 1 once the Lorentz boost associated with wave-driven plasma motion is included. Saturation is controlled by a0 ω0/ω_pe (the wave-to-plasma energy ratio), implying negligible scattering when this ratio is large. The results are applied to explain the escape of FRBs from magnetar winds.

Significance. If the analytic Lorentz-boost mapping holds for the nonlinear regime and the 1D results generalize, the work provides a concrete regime (a0 ω0/ω_pe ≫ 1) in which strong waves propagate with minimal induced scattering, offering a plausible explanation for FRB survival in magnetar environments. The re-characterization of nonlinearity in terms of a0 ω_pe/ω0 is a useful analytic insight that could guide future modeling.

major comments (3)

[Numerical simulations] The 1D PIC simulations are initialized exclusively in the linear regime (a0 ω_pe/ω0 ≪ 1) and evolved forward from the analytic steady state. No runs are reported that start from or reach a0 > 1 while keeping a0 ω_pe/ω0 of order unity or larger, so the validity of the Lorentz-boost argument for the nonlinear plasma response (γ ~ a0) is not numerically confirmed in the same code.
[Results and discussion] The central claim that linear induced-scattering analysis applies for a0 > 1 rests on an analytic mapping whose applicability to the nonlinear regime is not directly tested; the reported saturation behavior therefore cannot be taken as numerical confirmation of the strong-wave regime.
[Application to FRBs] The 1D geometry omits transverse instabilities (filamentation, Weibel) whose growth could alter the effective scattering rate; this limitation is particularly relevant for the claimed applicability to the 3D, inhomogeneous magnetar-wind environment of FRBs.

minor comments (2)

[Numerical simulations] The abstract and methods description do not provide simulation parameters, grid resolution, particle number, convergence tests, or error bars on the saturation level, preventing assessment of possible numerical artifacts.
[Introduction] Notation for the nonlinearity parameter (a0 ω_pe/ω0 versus a0 ω0/ω_pe) should be introduced with an explicit equation early in the text to avoid reader confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript on induced scattering of strong waves in pair plasmas. We address each major comment point by point below, clarifying the role of our analytic results versus the simulations and noting revisions to the manuscript where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The 1D PIC simulations are initialized exclusively in the linear regime (a0 ω_pe/ω0 ≪ 1) and evolved forward from the analytic steady state. No runs are reported that start from or reach a0 > 1 while keeping a0 ω_pe/ω0 of order unity or larger, so the validity of the Lorentz-boost argument for the nonlinear plasma response (γ ~ a0) is not numerically confirmed in the same code.

Authors: We agree that the reported PIC simulations begin from the linear-regime analytic steady state (a0 ω_pe/ω0 ≪ 1). The Lorentz-boost mapping and the characterization of nonlinearity by a0 ω_pe/ω0 are derived analytically for arbitrary amplitude in the steady-state solution, which is exact within the 1D cold-fluid model and does not rely on the simulations. The simulations then demonstrate that the induced-scattering evolution, including saturation controlled by the wave-to-plasma energy ratio a0 ω0/ω_pe, remains consistent with the boosted linear analysis even when a0 exceeds unity during the run (provided the energy ratio is large). We did not initialize additional runs directly from the nonlinear steady state at a0 > 1 with a0 ω_pe/ω0 of order unity, which would constitute a more direct numerical test of the mapping in that specific regime. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit statement in the methods and discussion sections clarifying the reliance on the analytic steady-state solution for the nonlinear regime and the scope of the numerical confirmation. revision: partial
Referee: The central claim that linear induced-scattering analysis applies for a0 > 1 rests on an analytic mapping whose applicability to the nonlinear regime is not directly tested; the reported saturation behavior therefore cannot be taken as numerical confirmation of the strong-wave regime.

Authors: The central claim is grounded in the analytic derivation showing that the effective nonlinearity parameter is a0 ω_pe/ω0 rather than a0 alone; the Lorentz-boost mapping follows directly from transforming to the frame where the plasma is at rest in the wave. The 1D simulations provide supporting evidence by showing that the saturation level and scattering behavior match the linear analysis (with boost) in the regimes we could access. We do not present the simulations as a direct numerical confirmation of the mapping inside the fully nonlinear regime; the saturation result is a consequence of the analytic energy-ratio argument. We will revise the results and discussion sections to emphasize the analytic foundation of the mapping and to avoid any implication that the simulations alone confirm the strong-wave regime. revision: yes
Referee: The 1D geometry omits transverse instabilities (filamentation, Weibel) whose growth could alter the effective scattering rate; this limitation is particularly relevant for the claimed applicability to the 3D, inhomogeneous magnetar-wind environment of FRBs.

Authors: We acknowledge that the study is performed in 1D geometry and therefore does not capture transverse instabilities such as filamentation or Weibel modes, which could modify the effective scattering rate in a three-dimensional, inhomogeneous environment. This is a genuine limitation when applying the results to the full magnetar-wind setting of FRBs. In the revised manuscript we will expand the discussion section to state this caveat explicitly, note that the 1D results provide a lower bound on scattering in the absence of transverse effects, and suggest that multidimensional simulations would be needed to assess robustness in more realistic geometries. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper analytically revisits the steady-state solution for arbitrary-amplitude waves in pair plasmas, identifying the nonlinearity parameter as a0 ω_pe/ω0 rather than a0 alone. It then initializes 1D PIC simulations from this analytic steady state exclusively in the linear regime (a0 ω_pe/ω0 ≪ 1) and evolves them forward to observe induced scattering. The claim that conventional linear analysis remains applicable for a0 > 1 follows from an explicit Lorentz-boost mapping between frames, not from any redefinition or refitting of the simulation outputs. Saturation scaling with a0 ω0/ω_pe is presented as the wave-to-plasma energy ratio, again derived analytically. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its inputs, no self-citation chain is invoked for uniqueness, and the numerical results supply independent verification rather than tautological confirmation. This is a standard, non-circular workflow.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard relativistic plasma physics (Maxwell equations, Lorentz force, pair plasma dispersion) and the validity of 1D PIC for capturing induced scattering; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond the usual simulation resolution and boundary choices.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The plasma is cold and unmagnetized except for the wave-induced motion
Implicit in the steady-state solution and 1D simulation setup described in the abstract
domain assumption One-dimensional geometry suffices to capture the saturation of induced scattering
Stated by the choice of 1D PIC simulations

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5563 in / 1477 out tokens · 36615 ms · 2026-05-10T08:12:37.618761+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Since the incident wave strongly drives the plasma in the +xdirection fora 0 >1 and the Lorentz boost effect due tov D is not negligible (see Eq. 53), the maximum growth rate Γ max in the laboratory frame should satisfy the Lorentz transformation [71] Γ′ max = Γmax γD(1−β gβD) ,(58) where βD = vD c ,(59) γD = 1p 1−β 2 D .(60) Here we have assumed that the...
[2]

Program for Promoting Researches on the Supercomputer Fugaku

For (a 0, ω0/ωpe) = (0.05,5) (yellow) and (0.1,10) (green), a significant fraction of the incident Poynting flux is dissipated, and the scattered Poynting flux be- comes comparable to the incident flux by the end of the simulation for both values ofβ th0. Asa 0 increases, the incident Poynting flux is less affected by SBS, and the scattered Poynting flux ...
[3]

D. R. Lorimer, M. Bailes, M. A. McLaughlin, D. J. Narkevic, and F. Crawford, A Bright Millisecond Radio Burst of Extragalactic Origin, Science318, 777 (2007). 12

2007
[4]

Petroff, J

E. Petroff, J. W. T. Hessels, and D. R. Lorimer, Fast radio bursts at the dawn of the 2020s, Astron. Astrophys. Rev.30, 2 (2022)

2022
[5]

Zhang, The physics of fast radio bursts, Rev

B. Zhang, The physics of fast radio bursts, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 035005 (2023)

2023
[6]

Masui, H

K. Masui, H. H. Lin, J. Sievers, C. J. Anderson, T. C. Chang, X. Chen, A. Ganguly, M. Jarvis, C. Y. Kuo, Y. C. Li, Y. W. Liao, M. McLaughlin, U. L. Pen, J. B. Peterson, A. Roman, P. T. Timbie, T. Voytek, and J. K. Yadav, Dense magnetized plasma associated with a fast radio burst, Nature528, 523 (2015)

2015
[7]

Michilli, A

D. Michilli, A. Seymour, J. W. Hessels, L. G. Spitler, V. Gajjar, A. M. Archibald, G. C. Bower, S. Chatterjee, J. M. Cordes, K. Gourdji, G. H. Heald, V. M. Kaspi, C. J. Law, C. Sobey, E. A. Adams, C. G. Bassa, S. Bogdanov, C. Brinkman, P. Demorest, F. Fernandez, G. Hellbourg, T. J. Lazio, R. S. Lynch, N. Maddox, B. Marcote, M. A. McLaughlin, Z. Paragi, S....

2018
[8]

R. Luo, B. J. Wang, Y. P. Men, C. F. Zhang, J. C. Jiang, H. Xu, W. Y. Wang, K. J. Lee, J. L. Han, B. Zhang, R. N. Caballero, M. Z. Chen, X. L. Chen, H. Q. Gan, Y. J. Guo, L. F. Hao, Y. X. Huang, P. Jiang, H. Li, J. Li, Z. X. Li, J. T. Luo, J. Pan, X. Pei, L. Qian, J. H. Sun, M. Wang, N. Wang, Z. G. Wen, R. X. Xu, Y. H. Xu, J. Yan, W. M. Yan, D. J. Yu, J. ...

2020
[9]

B. C. Andersen, K. M. Bandura, M. Bhardwaj, A. Bij, M. M. Boyce, P. J. Boyle, C. Brar, T. Cassanelli, P. Chawla, T. Chen, J. F. Cliche, A. Cook, D. Cubranic, A. P. Curtin, N. T. Denman, M. Dobbs, F. Q. Dong, M. Fandino, E. Fonseca, B. M. Gaensler, U. Giri, D. C. Good, M. Halpern, A. S. Hill, G. F. Hinshaw, C. H¨ ofer, A. Josephy, J. W. Kania, V. M. Kaspi,...

2020
[10]

C. D. Bochenek, V. Ravi, K. V. Belov, G. Hallinan, J. Kocz, S. R. Kulkarni, and D. L. McKenna, A fast radio burst associated with a Galactic magnetar, Nature587, 59 (2020)

2020
[11]

Mereghetti, V

S. Mereghetti, V. Savchenko, C. Ferrigno, D. G¨ otz, M. Rigoselli, A. Tiengo, A. Bazzano, E. Bozzo, A. Coleiro, T. J.-L. Courvoisier, M. Doyle, A. Goldwurm, L. Hanlon, E. Jourdain, A. von Kienlin, A. Lutovinov, A. Martin-Carrillo, S. Molkov, L. Natalucci, F. Onori, F. Panessa, J. Rodi, J. Rodriguez, C. S´ anchez-Fern´ andez, R. Sunyaev, and P. Ubertini, I...

1935
[12]

Ridnaia, D

A. Ridnaia, D. Svinkin, D. Frederiks, A. Bykov, R. A. S. Popov, S. Golenetskii, A. Lysenko, A. Tsvetkova, M. Ulanov, and T. Cline, A peculiar hard x-ray coun- terpart of a galactic fast radio burst, Nat. Astron.5, 372 (2021)

2021
[13]

C. K. Li, L. Lin, S. L. Xiong, M. Y. Ge, X. B. Li, T. P. Li, F. J. Lu, S. N. Zhang, Y. L. Tuo, Y. Nang, B. Zhang, S. Xiao, Y. Chen, L. M. Song, Y. P. Xu, C. Z. Liu, S. M. Jia, X. L. Cao, J. L. Qu, S. Zhang, Y. D. Gu, J. Y. Liao, X. F. Zhao, Y. Tan, J. Y. Nie, H. S. Zhao, S. J. Zheng, Y. G. Zheng, Q. Luo, C. Cai, B. Li, W. C. Xue, Q. C. Bu, Z. Chang, G. Ch...

2021
[14]

J. I. Katz, Coherent emission in fast radio bursts, Phys. Rev. D89, 103009 (2014)

2014
[15]

Kumar, W

P. Kumar, W. Lu, and M. Bhattacharya, Fast radio burst source properties and curvature radiation model, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.468, 2726 (2017)

2017
[16]

J. I. Katz, Coherent plasma-curvature radiation in FRB, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.481, 2946 (2018)

2018
[17]

Lu and P

W. Lu and P. Kumar, On the radiation mechanism of repeating fast radio bursts, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 477, 2470 (2018)

2018
[18]

W. Lu, P. Kumar, and B. Zhang, A unified picture of Galactic and cosmological fast radio bursts, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.498, 1397 (2020)

2020
[19]

Wang, Y.-P

W.-Y. Wang, Y.-P. Yang, C.-H. Niu, R. Xu, and B. Zhang, Magnetospheric Curvature Radiation by Bunches as Emission Mechanism for Repeating Fast Ra- dio Bursts, Astrophys. J.927, 105 (2022)

2022
[20]

Ioka, Fast Radio Burst Breakouts from Magnetar Burst Fireballs, Astrophys

K. Ioka, Fast Radio Burst Breakouts from Magnetar Burst Fireballs, Astrophys. J. Lett.904, L15 (2020)

2020
[21]

Wada and K

T. Wada and K. Ioka, Expanding fireball in magnetar bursts and fast radio bursts, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 519, 4094 (2023)

2023
[22]

Lyubarsky, Fast Radio Bursts from Reconnection in a Magnetar Magnetosphere, Astrophys

Y. Lyubarsky, Fast Radio Bursts from Reconnection in a Magnetar Magnetosphere, Astrophys. J.897, 1 (2020)

2020
[23]

Lyubarsky, Emission Mechanisms of Fast Radio Bursts, Universe7, 56 (2021)

Y. Lyubarsky, Emission Mechanisms of Fast Radio Bursts, Universe7, 56 (2021)

2021
[24]

J. F. Mahlmann, A. A. Philippov, A. Levinson, A. Spitkovsky, and H. Hakobyan, Electromagnetic Fire- works: Fast Radio Bursts from Rapid Reconnection in the Compressed Magnetar Wind, Astrophys. J. Lett. 932, L20 (2022)

2022
[25]

Lyubarsky, A model for fast extragalactic radio bursts, Mon

Y. Lyubarsky, A model for fast extragalactic radio bursts, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.442, L9 (2014). 13

2014
[26]

Waxman, On the Origin of Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs), Astrophys

E. Waxman, On the Origin of Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs), Astrophys. J.842, 34 (2017)

2017
[27]

A. M. Beloborodov, A Flaring Magnetar in FRB 121102?, Astrophys. J.843, L26 (2017)

2017
[28]

A. M. Beloborodov, Blast Waves from Magnetar Flares and Fast Radio Bursts, Astrophys. J.896, 142 (2020)

2020
[29]

Plotnikov and L

I. Plotnikov and L. Sironi, The synchrotron maser emis- sion from relativistic shocks in Fast Radio Bursts: 1D PIC simulations of cold pair plasmas, Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc.485, 3816 (2019)

2019
[30]

Sironi, I

L. Sironi, I. Plotnikov, J. N¨ attil¨ a, and A. M. Be- loborodov, Coherent Electromagnetic Emission from Rel- ativistic Magnetized Shocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 035101 (2021)

2021
[31]

Vanthieghem and A

A. Vanthieghem and A. Levinson, Fast Radio Bursts as Precursor Radio Emission from Monster Shocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 035201 (2025)

2025
[32]

B. D. Metzger, B. Margalit, and L. Sironi, Fast radio bursts as synchrotron maser emission from decelerating relativistic blast waves, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.485, 4091 (2019)

2019
[33]

Margalit, B

B. Margalit, B. D. Metzger, and L. Sironi, Constraints on the engines of fast radio bursts, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.494, 4627 (2020)

2020
[34]

Margalit, P

B. Margalit, P. Beniamini, N. Sridhar, and B. D. Met- zger, Implications of a ”Fast Radio Burst” from a Galac- tic Magnetar, Astrophys. J. Lett.899, L27 (2020)

2020
[35]

Iwamoto, Y

M. Iwamoto, Y. Matsumoto, T. Amano, S. Matsukiyo, and M. Hoshino, Linearly Polarized Coherent Emission from Relativistic Magnetized Ion-Electron Shocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 035201 (2024)

2024
[36]

Luan and P

J. Luan and P. Goldreich, PHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS ON FAST RADIO BURSTS, Astrophys. J. Lett.785, L26 (2014)

2014
[37]

Lyubarsky, Induced Scattering of Short Radio Pulses, Astrophys

Y. Lyubarsky, Induced Scattering of Short Radio Pulses, Astrophys. J.682, 1443 (2008)

2008
[38]

Lyubarsky, Interaction of the electromagnetic precur- sor from a relativistic shock with the upstream flow – II

Y. Lyubarsky, Interaction of the electromagnetic precur- sor from a relativistic shock with the upstream flow – II. Induced scattering of strong electromagnetic waves, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.490, 1474 (2019)

2019
[39]

A. M. Beloborodov, Can a Strong Radio Burst Escape the Magnetosphere of a Magnetar?, Astrophys. J. Lett. 922, L7 (2021)

2021
[40]

A. M. Beloborodov, Scattering of Ultrastrong Electro- magnetic Waves by Magnetized Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 255003 (2022)

2022
[41]

A. M. Beloborodov, Damping of Strong GHz Waves near Magnetars and the Origin of Fast Radio Bursts, Astro- phys. J.975, 223 (2024)

2024
[42]

Sobacchi, M

E. Sobacchi, M. Iwamoto, L. Sironi, and T. Piran, Escape of fast radio bursts from magnetars, Astron. Astrophys. 690, A332 (2024)

2024
[43]

Sobacchi, Absorption of strong electromagnetic waves in magnetized pair plasmas, Phys

E. Sobacchi, Absorption of strong electromagnetic waves in magnetized pair plasmas, Phys. Rev. E112, 065208 (2025)

2025
[44]

Nishiura, S

R. Nishiura, S. F. Kamijima, M. Iwamoto, and K. Ioka, Induced Compton scattering in magnetized electron and positron pair plasma, Phys. Rev. D111, 063055 (2025)

2025
[45]

Nishiura, S

R. Nishiura, S. F. Kamijima, and K. Ioka, Unified kinetic theory of induced scattering: Compton, Brillouin, and Raman processes in magnetized electron and positron pair plasma, arXiv (2025), arXiv:2510.12869

work page arXiv 2025
[46]

S. F. Kamijima, R. Nishiura, M. Iwamoto, and K. Ioka, One-dimensional PIC Simulation of Induced Compton Scattering in Magnetized Electron-Positron Pair Plasma, arXiv (2026), arXiv:2601.01169

work page arXiv 2026
[47]

Nishiura, S

R. Nishiura, S. F. Kamijima, and K. Ioka, Induced Scat- tering of Fast Radio Bursts in Magnetar Magnetospheres, arXiv (2026), arXiv:2601.18865

work page arXiv 2026
[48]

Y. Qu, P. Kumar, and B. Zhang, Transparency of fast ra- dio burst waves in magnetar magnetospheres, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.515, 2020 (2022)

2020
[49]

Lyutikov, The escape of fast radio burst emission from magnetars, Mon

M. Lyutikov, The escape of fast radio burst emission from magnetars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.529, 2180 (2024)

2024
[50]

Qu and B

Y. Qu and B. Zhang, Coherent Inverse Compton Scat- tering in Fast Radio Bursts Revisited, Astrophys. J.972, 124 (2024)

2024
[51]

Akhiezer and R

A. Akhiezer and R. Polovin, THEORY OF WAVE MO- TION OF AN ELECTRON PLASMA, Soviet Phys. JETP3, 696 (1956)

1956
[52]

Kaw and J

P. Kaw and J. Dawson, Relativistic nonlinear propaga- tion of laser beams in cold overdense plasmas, Phys. Flu- ids13, 472 (1970)

1970
[53]

C. E. Max and F. Perkins, Strong electromagnetic waves in overdense plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett.27, 1342 (1971)

1971
[54]

C. E. Max, Steady-state solutions for relativistically strong electromagnetic waves in plasmas, Phys. Fluids 16, 1277 (1973)

1973
[55]

P. C. Clemmow, Nonlinear Waves in a cold Plasma by Lorentz Transformation, J. Plasma Phys.12, 297 (1974)

1974
[56]

C. F. Kennel and R. Pellat, Relativistic nonlinear plasma waves in a magnetic field, J. Plasma Phys.15, 335 (1976)

1976
[57]

C. F. Kennel, G. Schmidt, and T. Wilcox, Cosmic-Ray Generation by Pulsars, Phys. Rev. Lett.31, 1364 (1973)

1973
[58]

Arka and J

I. Arka and J. G. Kirk, Superluminal waves in pulsar winds, Astrophys. J.745, 108 (2012)

2012
[59]

Mochol and J

I. Mochol and J. G. Kirk, PROPAGATION AND STA- BILITY OF SUPERLUMINAL WAVES IN PULSAR WINDS, Astrophys. J.771, 53 (2013)

2013
[60]

Ghosh, D

A. Ghosh, D. Kagan, U. Keshet, and Y. Lyubarsky, Non- linear Electromagnetic-wave Interactions in Pair Plasma. I. Nonrelativistic Regime, Astrophys. J.930, 106 (2022)

2022
[61]

Iwamoto, E

M. Iwamoto, E. Sobacchi, and L. Sironi, Kinetic simu- lations of the filamentation instability in pair plasmas, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.522, 2133 (2023)

2023
[62]

Sobacchi, M

E. Sobacchi, M. Iwamoto, L. Sironi, and T. Piran, Prop- agation of strong electromagnetic waves in tenuous plas- mas, Phys. Rev. Research6, 043213 (2024)

2024
[63]

Sobacchi, Y

E. Sobacchi, Y. Lyubarsky, A. M. Beloborodov, L. Sironi, and M. Iwamoto, Saturation of the Filamentation Insta- bility and Dispersion Measure of Fast Radio Bursts, As- trophys. J. Lett.943, L21 (2023)

2023
[64]

J. E. Gunn and J. P. Ostriker, On the Motion and Ra- diation of Charged Particles in Strong Electromagnetic Waves. I. Motion in Plane and Spherical Waves, Astro- phys. J.165, 523 (1971)

1971
[65]

W. J. Cody, Chebyshev Approximations for the Com- plete Elliptic Integrals K and E, Math. Comp.19, 105 (1965)

1965
[66]

J. F. Drake, P. K. Kaw, Y. C. Lee, G. Schmid, C. S. Liu, and M. N. Rosenbluth, Parametric instabilities of electromagnetic waves in plasmas, Phys. Fluids14, 778 (1974)

1974
[67]

D. W. Forslund, J. M. Kindel, and E. L. Lindman, The- ory of stimulated scattering processes in laser-irradiated plasmas, Phys. Fluids18, 1002 (1975)

1975
[68]

W. L. Kruer,The Physics of Laser Plasma Interactions (Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1988). 14

1988
[69]

Matsukiyo and T

S. Matsukiyo and T. Hada, Parametric instabilities of cir- cularly polarized Alfv´ en waves in a relativistic electron- positron plasma, Phys. Rev. E67, 046406 (2003)

2003
[70]

Ishizaki and K

W. Ishizaki and K. Ioka, Parametric decay instability of circularly polarized Alfv´ en waves in magnetically domi- nated plasma, Phys. Rev. E110, 015205 (2024)

2024
[71]

Schluck, G

F. Schluck, G. Lehmann, and K. H. Spatschek, Para- metric pulse amplification by acoustic quasimodes in electron-positron plasma, Phys. Rev. E96, 053204 (2017)

2017
[72]

E. S. Sarachik and G. T. Schappert, Classical Theory of the Scattering of Intense Laser Radiation by Free Elec- trons, Phys. Rev. D1, 2738 (1970)

1970
[73]

Hasegawa, Free Electron Laser, Bell Syst

A. Hasegawa, Free Electron Laser, Bell Syst. Tech. J.57, 3069 (1978)

1978
[74]

Matsumoto, T

Y. Matsumoto, T. Amano, M. Iwamoto, T. Jikei, and S. Zenitani, Wuming PIC2D (v0.6) (2024)

2024
[75]

Interaction of Strong Electromagnetic Waves with Unmagnetized Pair Plasmas

N. Sridhar, E. Sobacchi, L. Sironi, M. Iwamoto, D. Groˇ selj, and B. K. Russell, Interaction of Strong Elec- tromagnetic Waves with Unmagnetized Pair Plasmas, arXiv , 1 (2026), arXiv:2604.11698

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[76]

Matsukiyo and T

S. Matsukiyo and T. Hada, Relativistic particle accelera- tion in developing Alfv´ en turbulence, Astrophys. J.692, 1004 (2009)

2009
[77]

T. Sano, S. Isayama, K. Takahashi, and S. Matsukiyo, Relativistic two-wave resonant acceleration of electrons at large-amplitude standing whistler waves during laser- plasma interaction, Phys. Rev. E110, 065212 (2024)

2024
[78]

Isayama, S

S. Isayama, S. Matsukiyo, T. Sano, and S. H. Chen, Rel- ativistic multistage resonant and trailing-field accelera- tion induced by large-amplitude Alfv´ en waves in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. E112, 055201 (2025)

2025
[79]

Sobacchi, Y

E. Sobacchi, Y. Lyubarsky, A. M. Beloborodov, and L. Sironi, Self-modulation of fast radio bursts, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.500, 272 (2020)

2020
[80]

Sobacchi, Y

E. Sobacchi, Y. Lyubarsky, A. M. Beloborodov, and L. Sironi, Filamentation of fast radio bursts in magne- tar winds, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.511, 4766 (2022)

2022