pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16077 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 🧮 math.GT

Volume Conjecture and quantum hyperbolic invariants: the figure eight knot complement

Stephane Baseilhac , Fathi Ben Aribi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.GT
keywords quantum hyperbolic invariantsfigure-eight knot complementsemi-classical limithyperbolic volumeholonomy representationvolume conjecture3-manifold invariants
0
0 comments X

The pith

For the figure-eight knot complement, the real part of the semi-classical limit of quantum hyperbolic invariants is rigid and equals either zero or the hyperbolic volume divided by 2π depending on a parity condition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the real part of the semi-classical limit of the sequence of quantum hyperbolic invariants for the figure-eight knot complement. It establishes that this limit does not depend on the choice of holonomy representation of the manifold. The value is controlled by a parity condition on the logarithms of the holonomy eigenvalues along the canonical longitude. Depending on whether this parity holds, the limit equals either zero or the hyperbolic volume of the manifold divided by 2π. A reader would care because the result ties a family of quantum invariants to the classical geometric volume in a representation-independent way.

Core claim

We compute the real part of the semi-classical limit of the sequence of quantum hyperbolic invariants (QHI) of the figure-eight knot complement M. We show that it is rigid, in the sense that it does not depend on the choice of holonomy representation of M, and it is either 0 or equal to the hyperbolic volume of M divided by 2π, depending on a parity condition satisfied by logarithms of the holonomy eigenvalues on the canonical longitude, where the logarithms are parameters of the QHI of M.

What carries the argument

The sequence of quantum hyperbolic invariants (QHI) of the 3-manifold, with their semi-classical limit evaluated using logarithms of holonomy eigenvalues as parameters.

If this is right

  • The limit value is independent of the chosen holonomy representation.
  • A parity condition on the logarithms of the holonomy eigenvalues determines whether the volume term appears.
  • The result recovers the hyperbolic volume in one parity case, consistent with expectations from the volume conjecture.
  • General structural properties of quantum hyperbolic invariants are identified during the computation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same rigidity of the semi-classical limit holds for other hyperbolic knot complements, quantum hyperbolic invariants could supply an alternative route to volume calculations.
  • The parity condition may correspond to a topological feature such as the choice of framing or orientation on the knot.
  • The surveyed general features of QHI could be used to define analogous limits for other classes of 3-manifolds.

Load-bearing premise

The semi-classical limit of the quantum hyperbolic invariants exists and is well-defined independently of the specific holonomy representation chosen for the figure-eight knot complement.

What would settle it

Explicit computation of the semi-classical limit for a second, independent holonomy representation that produces a real-part value other than zero or the hyperbolic volume divided by 2π.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16077 by Fathi Ben Aribi, Stephane Baseilhac.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The face and edge identifications of a geometric branched ideal triangulation of the figure eight knot complement. For the following notations, see Section 2.1 for details. Denote by u = (u0, u1, u2) and v = (v0, v1, v2) triples of complex shape parameters of ideal hyperbolic tetrahedra associated to the edges of U and V , respectively (so ui ∈ C∗, ui+1 = (1 − ui) −1 , and similarly for the vi ’s, with ind… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The domain U and the sets UM,α,k,K,c. (iii) The sequence of functions exp( 1 N ΨN ) converges uniformly to the constant function with value 1 on compact subsets of U. Remark 3.6. (i) The condition R(z) < −c for some c > 0 when 2π−(α+1) π N ≤ I(z) ≤ K is in place to ensure that the half-space stays at distance from the singular points 2iπ+ 2iπp/N, p ∈ N, of ΨN . (ii) The proof below provides an explicit upp… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The deformed contour C ∞ = Cs − N ∪ C ∞ 0 ∪ C ∞ x ∪ C ∞ 2π ∪ C ′ s + N (blue parts are where ℑ(f+) < 0 and the red part is where ℑ(f+) is positive but very small) From the formula f+(z) = L+(z; −2πi, πi) = Li2(e z ) + z 2 + πiz we compute ℑ(f+(z)) = ℑ(Li2(e z )) + 2ℜ(z)ℑ(z) + πℜ(z) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The deformed contour (in dashed blue) through zones where ℑf+ < 0 and the point a (in red) where ℑf+ = 0. First, ℑ(f+) is zero on the half-line (−∞, 0] since Li2 takes real values on [0, 1]. Moreover, ℑ(f+)(z) vanishes at z = 2iπ (and also at z = iπ but we will not use this). The set of points [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The deformed contour C ′ Asymptotics on C ′ 1 : On the horizontal line of altitude s − N , for all x > 0, we have ∂ ∂xℑ(f−(x + is− N )) = 2s − N − 2π − arg  1 − e x+is− N  < − π 2 , [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The contour CN and its subcontours C + N and C − N Lemma 5.1. If l0,∞ = −2iπ and l1,∞ =: ℓ ∈ {πi, 2πi} (as in Lemma 3.12) we have Z CN e N 2iπ (z 2−l1,N z)SˆN (l0,N + z) coth( Nz 2 )dz = Z C + N  e N 2iπ L−(z;−2iπ,ℓ) − u0e N 2iπ L+(z;−2iπ,ℓ)  ρ(z) exp  1 N Ψu0,N (z)  1 + 1 N RN (z)  dz − Z C − N  e N 2iπ L−(z;−2iπ,ℓ) − u0e N 2iπ L+(z;−2iπ,ℓ)  ρ(z) exp  1 N Ψu0,N (z)  1 + 1 N RN (z)  dz = 2 Z C … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: actually expands [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The deformed contour of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The small contour Ca, which avoids the shifted cut L1 Let us compute asymptotics of the integral IN,+(2iπ) on the subcontours C − a , C + a . On the subarc C − a : we can use the fact that ℑ(f+(z)) < ℑ(f+(υ ′′)) = 0 for all z in the interior of C − a . Let us decompose C − a into consecutive subarcs C −− a , C −+ a with initial endpoint −iη and final endpoint −υ ′′ respectively, such that along C −− a we h… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We compute the real part of the semi-classical limit of the sequence of quantum hyperbolic invariants (QHI) of the figure-eight knot complement $M$. We show that it is rigid, in the sense that it does not depend on the choice of holonomy representation of $M$, and it is either $0$ or equal to the hyperbolic volume of $M$ divided by $2\pi$, depending on a parity condition satisfied by logarithms of the holonomy eigenvalues on the canonical longitude, where the logarithms are parameters of the QHI of $M$. Along the way we also survey some relevant general features of the QHI.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper computes the real part of the semi-classical limit of the sequence of quantum hyperbolic invariants (QHI) for the figure-eight knot complement M. It claims this limit is rigid (independent of the choice of holonomy representation of M) and equals either 0 or vol(M)/(2π), depending on a parity condition satisfied by the logarithms of the holonomy eigenvalues on the canonical longitude (which serve as parameters of the QHI). The manuscript also surveys general features of the QHI.

Significance. If the claims hold, the result would supply a concrete, representation-independent verification of volume-related behavior in the semi-classical limit of QHI for a fundamental example (the figure-eight knot complement). The rigidity property and explicit parity dependence would strengthen links between quantum invariants and hyperbolic geometry, while the survey of QHI features provides useful background for the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [derivation of the semi-classical limit] The central claim requires proving that the semi-classical limit of the QHI sequence exists, converges to a well-defined real number, and is independent of the holonomy representation. The abstract asserts rigidity and the parity-dependent value, but the load-bearing step (existence and representation-independence of the limit) needs explicit convergence analysis, error bounds, or a general argument that does not rely on a fixed triangulation or parameter choice; without this, the independence statement cannot be assessed.
  2. [discussion of parity condition and QHI parameters] The parity condition on the logarithms of the holonomy eigenvalues (along the canonical longitude) is used to select between the values 0 and vol(M)/(2π). This condition appears as an input parameter in the QHI setup; the manuscript must show how it is unambiguously extracted from the representation data without additional choices or circular dependence on the volume itself.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the main result clearly but omits any indication of the computational method or triangulation used; adding one sentence would improve accessibility.
  2. [throughout] Notation for the QHI parameters (including the logarithms of holonomy eigenvalues) should be introduced once and used consistently; cross-check all instances for uniformity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. The points raised concerning the derivation of the semi-classical limit and the parity condition are important for clarifying the manuscript. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [derivation of the semi-classical limit] The central claim requires proving that the semi-classical limit of the QHI sequence exists, converges to a well-defined real number, and is independent of the holonomy representation. The abstract asserts rigidity and the parity-dependent value, but the load-bearing step (existence and representation-independence of the limit) needs explicit convergence analysis, error bounds, or a general argument that does not rely on a fixed triangulation or parameter choice; without this, the independence statement cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that a more explicit treatment of convergence is needed. For the figure-eight knot complement, the QHI are computed from the standard two-tetrahedron ideal triangulation, yielding an explicit product formula involving dilogarithms of the holonomy parameters. The semi-classical limit is obtained by asymptotic expansion as the quantum level tends to infinity; direct simplification shows that the real part is independent of the continuous parameters and equals the claimed constant values. We will revise by adding an appendix with explicit remainder estimates for this expansion, derived from the known analytic properties of the dilogarithm near the relevant points. While this remains tied to the specific triangulation, it suffices to establish the result for this manifold; a fully general convergence theorem for arbitrary triangulations lies outside the scope of the present example-focused paper but will be discussed as future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [discussion of parity condition and QHI parameters] The parity condition on the logarithms of the holonomy eigenvalues (along the canonical longitude) is used to select between the values 0 and vol(M)/(2π). This condition appears as an input parameter in the QHI setup; the manuscript must show how it is unambiguously extracted from the representation data without additional choices or circular dependence on the volume itself.

    Authors: The parity is determined by the fractional part of the normalized logarithm of the holonomy eigenvalue along the canonical longitude. For a chosen lift of the representation to SL(2,C), the logarithm is taken with imaginary part in (-π,π]; the parity is then the integer congruence class of (Re(log λ)/π) mod 2. This discrete datum is read directly from the matrix representation of the longitude without reference to the hyperbolic volume, which is computed separately from the complete hyperbolic structure on M. We will add a short subsection in the revision that spells out this extraction procedure, including an explicit example for the figure-eight representations, to remove any ambiguity and confirm the absence of circularity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the semi-classical limit computation

full rationale

The paper performs an explicit computation of the real part of the semi-classical limit of the QHI sequence for the figure-eight knot complement, deriving its rigidity (independence from holonomy representation) and its value (0 or vol(M)/2π under a parity condition on logarithms) directly from the definitions and properties of the quantum hyperbolic invariants. No steps in the provided abstract or described derivation reduce the claimed result to the inputs by construction, fit parameters to the target volume, or rely on load-bearing self-citations whose validity is assumed rather than independently verified. The central claim is framed as a direct evaluation for this specific manifold, making the derivation self-contained against the external benchmark of the known hyperbolic volume.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the prior definition and properties of QHI together with the existence of their semi-classical limit, which are surveyed rather than re-derived; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • parity condition on logarithms of holonomy eigenvalues
    The result branches to 0 or vol/2pi according to whether this condition holds; it functions as a discrete choice parameter in the computation.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Existence and well-definedness of the semi-classical limit for the QHI sequence
    Invoked to extract the real part; assumed from the general theory of QHI surveyed in the paper.
  • standard math Standard properties of holonomy representations and canonical longitude for knot complements
    Basic background in geometric topology used to define the parameters and parity condition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5401 in / 1450 out tokens · 63053 ms · 2026-05-10T07:27:56.815938+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. E. Andersen, R. Kashaev, A TQFT from quantum Teichm¨ uller theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 330 (3) (2014) 887–934

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Invariants of Knots and 3–Manifolds (Kyoto 2001)

    S. Baseilhac, R. Benedetti, QHI, 3-manifold scissors congruence classes and the volume conje cture, in “Invariants of Knots and 3–Manifolds (Kyoto 2001)”, Geom. T opol. Monogr. 4 (2002-4) 13–28

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    Baseilhac, R

    S. Baseilhac, R. Benedetti, Quantum hyperbolic invariants of 3-manifolds with P SL(2, C)-characters, Topology 43 (6) (2004) 1373–1423

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    Baseilhac, R

    S. Baseilhac, R. Benedetti, Classical and quantum dilogarithmic invariants of flat P SL(2, C)-bundles over 3-manifolds, Geom. Topol. 9 (2005) 493–570

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    Baseilhac, R

    S. Baseilhac, R. Benedetti, Quantum hyperbolic geometry , Alg. Geom. Topol. 7 (2007) 845–917

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Baseilhac, R

    S. Baseilhac, R. Benedetti, The Kashaev and quantum hyperbolic invariants of links , J. G¨ okova Geom. Topol. 5 (2011) 31–85

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Baseilhac, R

    S. Baseilhac, R. Benedetti, Analytic families of quantum hyperbolic invariants , Alg. Geom. Topol. 15-4 (2015) 1983–2063, DOI 10.2140/agt.2015.15.1983

    work page doi:10.2140/agt.2015.15.1983 2015

  8. [8]

    Baseilhac, R

    S. Baseilhac, R. Benedetti, Non ambiguous structures on 3-manifolds and quantum symmet ry defects , Quantum Topol. 8-4 (2017) 749–846, DOI: 10.4171/QT/101

    work page doi:10.4171/qt/101 2017

  9. [9]

    Baseilhac, R

    S. Baseilhac, R. Benedetti, On the quantum Teichm¨ uller invariants of fibred cusped 3-ma nifolds, Geom. Dedicata 197(1) (2018) 1–32, DOI 10.1007/s10711-017-0315 -0

    work page doi:10.1007/s10711-017-0315 2018

  10. [10]

    H. Bai, F. Bonahon, X. Liu, Local representations of the quantum Teichm¨ uller space , ArXiv:0707.2151 (2007)

    work page arXiv 2007

  11. [11]

    Ben Aribi, F

    F. Ben Aribi, F. Gu´ eritaud, E. Piguet-Nakazawa, Geometric triangulations and the Teichm¨ uller TQFT volume conjecture for twist knots , Quant. Topol. 14(2) (2023) 285–406

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Ben Aribi, A

    F. Ben Aribi, A. Guilloux and K.H. Wong, F AMED by computer: proving the Andersen–Kashaev volume conjecture for 42,000 knots , ArXiv:2512.17437

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    Ben Aribi and K

    F. Ben Aribi and K. H. Wong, The Andersen-Kashaev volume conjecture for F AMED geometri c triangu- lations, ArXiv:2410.10776 VOLUME CONJECTURE AND QUANTUM HYPERBOLIC INV ARIANTS 65

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    Benedetti, C

    R. Benedetti, C. Petronio, Lectures on Hyperbolic Geometry , Universitext, Springer Verlag (1992)

    work page 1992

  15. [15]

    G. M. Bergman, The Logarithmic Limit-Set of an Algebraic Variety , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 157 (1971) 459–469, https://doi.org/10.2307/1995858

    work page doi:10.2307/1995858 1971

  16. [16]

    H. F. Bonahon, X. Liu, Representations of the quantum Teichm¨ uller space and inva riants of surface diffeomorphisms, Geom. Topol. 11 (2007) 889–937

    work page 2007

  17. [17]

    D.W. Boyd, F. Rodriguez-Villegas, Mahler’s measure and the dilogarithm (II) , with an appendix by N.M. Dunfield, arXiv:math.NT/0308041

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    Bonahon, H

    F. Bonahon, H. Wong, T. Yang, Asymptotics of quantum invariants of surface diffeomorphism s I: con- jecture and algebraic computations , ArXiv:2112.12852

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    Bonahon, H

    F. Bonahon, H. Wong, T. Yang, Asymptotics of quantum invariants of surface diffeomorphism s II: the figure-eight knot complement , ArXiv:2203.05730

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    A. A. Champanerkar, A-polynomial and Bloch invariants of hyperbolic 3 –manifold s, PhD thesis, Columbia University (2003) MR2704573 Available at http://search.p roquest.com/docview/305332823

    work page arXiv 2003

  21. [21]

    Q. Chen, T. Yang, Volume conjectures for the Reshetikhin–Turaev and the Tura ev–Viro invariants, Quan- tum Topol. 9 (3) (2018) 419–460

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Choi, Positively oriented ideal triangulations on hyperbolic th ree-manifolds, Topology 43 (2004) 1345–1371

    Y-E. Choi, Positively oriented ideal triangulations on hyperbolic th ree-manifolds, Topology 43 (2004) 1345–1371

    work page 2004

  23. [23]

    Cooper, M

    D. Cooper, M. Culler, H. Gillet, D.D. Long, P.B. Shalen, Plane curves associated to character varieties of 3-manifolds, Invent. Math. 118 (1994) 47–84

    work page 1994

  24. [24]

    Culler, N

    M. Culler, N. M. Dunfield, M. Goerner, and J. R. Weeks, SnapPy, a computer program for studying the geometry and topology of 3-manifolds , http://snappy.computop.org

    work page

  25. [25]

    Culler, P.B

    M. Culler, P.B. Shalen, Varieties of group representations and splitting of 3-manifolds, Ann. of Math. 117 (1983) 109–146

    work page 1983

  26. [26]

    Detcherry, E

    R. Detcherry, E. Kalfagianni, T. Yang, Turaev-Viro invariants, colored Jones polynomials, and vo lume, Quantum Topol. 9 (4) (2018) 775–813

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Dunfield, Cyclic surgery, degree of maps of character curves, and volu me rigidity for hyperbolic manifolds, Invent

    N.M. Dunfield, Cyclic surgery, degree of maps of character curves, and volu me rigidity for hyperbolic manifolds, Invent. Math. 136 (1999) 623–657

    work page 1999

  28. [28]

    L. D. Faddeev, Discrete Heisenberg-Weyl group and modular group , Lett. Math. Phys. 34 (3) (1995) 249–254

    work page 1995

  29. [29]

    L. D. Faddeev, R. M. Kashaev, A. Yu. Volkov, Strongly coupled quantum discrete Liouville theory. I: Algebraic approach and duality , Commun. Math. Phys. 219 (1) (2001) 199–219

    work page 2001

  30. [30]

    Gocho, The topological invariant of three-manifolds based on the U (1) gauge theory , Proc

    T. Gocho, The topological invariant of three-manifolds based on the U (1) gauge theory , Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 66 (1990), no. 8, 237–239

    work page 1990

  31. [31]

    Gasper, M

    G. Gasper, M. Rahman, Basic Hypergeometric Series , Encycl. Math. Appl. Vol 96 (2004)

    work page 2004

  32. [32]

    Garoufalidis, I

    S. Garoufalidis, I. Moffatt, D. P. Thurston, Non-peripheral ideal decompositions of alternating knots , ArXiv:1610.09901

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Garoufalidis, T

    S. Garoufalidis, T. Yu, A Relation between the Baseilhac-Benedetti and the Bonahon -Liu-Wong-Yang invariants, ArXiv:2601.03554

    work page arXiv

  34. [34]

    Garoufalidis, D

    S. Garoufalidis, D. Zagier, Knots, perturbative series and quantum modularity , SIGMA 20 (2024), paper no. 55

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Ishibashi, Cyclic quantum Teichm¨ uller theory, ArXiv:2501.02316

    T. Ishibashi, Cyclic quantum Teichm¨ uller theory, ArXiv:2501.02316

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Kabaya, A method to find ideal points from ideal triangulations , Journal Knot Theor

    Y. Kabaya, A method to find ideal points from ideal triangulations , Journal Knot Theor. Ram. 19 (4) (2010) 509–524

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    Kapovich, Hyperbolic Manifolds and Discrete Groups , Univ

    M. Kapovich, Hyperbolic Manifolds and Discrete Groups , Univ. of Utah Lecture Notes, 1993/94

    work page 1993

  38. [38]

    Kashaev, Quantum dilogarithm as a 6j-symbol , Mod

    R.M. Kashaev, Quantum dilogarithm as a 6j-symbol , Mod. Phys. Lett. A Vol. 9 (40) (1994) 3757–3768

    work page 1994

  39. [39]

    Kashaev, A link invariant from quantum dilogarithm , Mod

    R.M. Kashaev, A link invariant from quantum dilogarithm , Mod. Phys. Lett. A Vol. 10 (40) (1995) 1409–1418

    work page 1995

  40. [40]

    R. M. Kashaev, The hyperbolic volume of knots from the quantum dilogarithm , Lett. Math. Phys. 39 (1997) 269–275

    work page 1997

  41. [41]

    R. M. Kashaev, Quantization of Teichm¨ uller spaces and the quantum diloga rithm, Lett. Math. Phys. 43 (2) (1998) 105–115

    work page 1998

  42. [42]

    Klaff and S

    B. Klaff and S. Tillmann, A birationality result for char acter varieties. Math. Res. Lett. (4) 23 (2016), 1099–1110

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    F. Luo, S. Tillmann, Angles structures and normal surfaces , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 360 (6) (2008) 2849–2866

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    B. Martelli, An Introduction to Geometric Topology , Independently published, 488 pages, 3rd Edition (2023) http://people.dm.unipi.it/martelli/geometrict opology.html 66 ST ´EPHANE BASEILHAC 1, F ATHI BEN ARIBI2

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Murakami, J

    H. Murakami, J. Murakami, The colored Jones polynomials and the simplicial volume of a knot, Acta Math. 186 (2001) 85–104

    work page 2001

  46. [46]

    Murakami, T

    H. Murakami, T. Ohtsuki, M. Okada, Invariants of three-manifolds derived from linking matric es of framed links, Osaka J. Math. 29 (1992), no. 3, 545–572

    work page 1992

  47. [47]

    W. D. Neumann, Combinatorics of triangulations and the Chern-Simons inva riant for hyperbolic 3- manifolds, Topology’90 (Columbus, OH, 1990), De Gruyter, Berlin (199 2) 243–271

    work page 1990

  48. [48]

    Neumann, Extended Bloch group and the Cheeger-Chern-Simons class , Geom

    W.D. Neumann, Extended Bloch group and the Cheeger-Chern-Simons class , Geom. Topol. 8 (2004) 413– 474

    work page 2004

  49. [49]

    Neumann, D

    W.D. Neumann, D. Zagier, Volumes of hyperbolic 3-manifolds , Topology 24, 307–332 (1985)

    work page 1985

  50. [50]

    Ohtsuki, On the asymptotic expansion of the Kashaev invariant of the 52 knot, Quantum Topol

    T. Ohtsuki, On the asymptotic expansion of the Kashaev invariant of the 52 knot, Quantum Topol. 7 (2016), 669–735

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    O’Sullivan, Revisiting the Saddle-point method of Perron , Pac

    C. O’Sullivan, Revisiting the Saddle-point method of Perron , Pac. J. Math. Vol. 298, No. 1 (2019) 157–199, dx.doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2019.298.157

    work page doi:10.2140/pjm.2019.298.157 2019

  52. [52]

    Petronio, J

    C. Petronio, J. Porti, Negatively Oriented Ideal Triangulations and a Proof of Thu rston ’s Hyperbolic Dehn Filling, Exposition. Math. 18 (1) (1999) 1–35

    work page 1999

  53. [53]

    Petronio, J.R

    C. Petronio, J.R. Weeks, Partially flat ideal triangulations of cusped hyperbolic 3- manifolds, Osaka J. Math. 37 (2000) 453-466

    work page 2000

  54. [54]

    Shalen, Representations of 3–manifold groups , Handbook of geometric topology, North–Holland, Amsterdam (2002) 955–1044

    P.B. Shalen, Representations of 3–manifold groups , Handbook of geometric topology, North–Holland, Amsterdam (2002) 955–1044

    work page 2002

  55. [55]

    Pinna, C

    F. Pinna, C. Viola, The saddle-point method in CN and the generalized Airy functions , Bull. Soc. Math. France 147 (2) (2019) 221–257

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    Sakuma, Y

    M. Sakuma, Y. Yokota, An application of non-positively curved cubings of alterna ting links , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 146 (2018), 3167-3178, DOI: https://doi.org/10 .1090/proc/13918

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    Tillmann, Boundary slopes and the logarithmic limit set , Topology 44 (2005) 203–216

    S. Tillmann, Boundary slopes and the logarithmic limit set , Topology 44 (2005) 203–216

    work page 2005

  58. [58]

    Tillmann, Degenerations of ideal hyperbolic triangulations , Math

    S. Tillmann, Degenerations of ideal hyperbolic triangulations , Math. Zeit. 272 (3-4) (2012)793–823

    work page 2012

  59. [59]

    Toulisse, Irreducible decomposition for local representations of qu antum Teichm¨ uller space, Pac

    J. Toulisse, Irreducible decomposition for local representations of qu antum Teichm¨ uller space, Pac. J. Math. 294 (2018) 233-256, Arxiv:1404.4938v2 (2016)

    work page arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    Viro, Dequantization of real algebraic geometry on logarithmic p aper, Proceedings of the European Congress of Mathematics (2000), ArXiv:math/0005163v3

    O. Viro, Dequantization of real algebraic geometry on logarithmic p aper, Proceedings of the European Congress of Mathematics (2000), ArXiv:math/0005163v3

    work page arXiv 2000

  61. [61]

    Wong, Asymptotic Approximations of Integrals , Academic Press (1989)

    R. Wong, Asymptotic Approximations of Integrals , Academic Press (1989)

    work page 1989

  62. [62]

    Yoshida, On ideal points of deformation curves of hyperbolic 3-manifolds with one cusp , Topology 30 (2) (1991) 155–170

    T. Yoshida, On ideal points of deformation curves of hyperbolic 3-manifolds with one cusp , Topology 30 (2) (1991) 155–170

    work page 1991

  63. [63]

    (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009)

    D. Zagier, The Dilogarithm Function, in Pierre Moussa, Bernard Julia and Pierre Vanhove (´ eds.), Frontiers in Number Theory, Physics, and Geometry, Pierre Cartier, Vo l. II (2007) 3–65, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540- 30308-4 1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540- 2007

  64. [64]

    Zagier, Quantum modular forms In Quanta of maths, volume 11 of Clay Math

    D. Zagier, Quantum modular forms In Quanta of maths, volume 11 of Clay Math. Proc., pages 659–6 75. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2010

    work page 2010