pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16849 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-18 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.app-ph

Flat optics for analog computing: from fundamental mechanisms to advanced meta-processors

Tingting Liu , Jumin Qiu , Xintong Shi , Qiegen Liu , Shuyuan Xiao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.app-ph
keywords metasurfacesoptical analog computingflat opticsedge detectionmeta-processorsinverse designoptical neural networksmachine vision
0
0 comments X

The pith

Metasurfaces enable optical analog computers to execute mathematical operations like differentiation at light speed with zero power.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The review establishes that metasurfaces provide the wave-manipulation tools needed to shift optical computing from bulky setups to compact on-chip processors. It surveys three main architectures that perform core tasks such as spatial differentiation and edge detection. The work traces progress from fixed linear devices to ones that can be reconfigured, made nonlinear, or augmented with quantum effects. It concludes that pairing these meta-processors with AI design tools and optical neural networks opens a route to energy-efficient machine vision systems that bypass electronic bottlenecks.

Core claim

Metasurface-empowered flat optics supplies a practical route to analog processors that perform mathematical operations directly on light fields, advancing from static Fourier and interferometric schemes to reconfigurable, nonlinear, and quantum-assisted multidimensional platforms for intelligent vision applications.

What carries the argument

Metasurface architectures operating in Fourier-domain, nonlocal spatial-domain, and interferometric modes that reshape wavefronts to implement operations such as differentiation and edge detection.

If this is right

  • Visual data can be processed at the speed of light without drawing electrical power.
  • Meta-processors can move beyond fixed linear tasks to dynamically adjustable and nonlinear functions.
  • Integration of analog meta-front-ends with optical neural networks will support higher-dimensional vision tasks.
  • AI-driven inverse design will shorten the cycle from concept to functional optical computing devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same metasurface mechanisms could extend to other high-volume data streams such as real-time sensor fusion.
  • Quantum-assisted versions may open routes to low-energy secure computation that classical optics cannot match.
  • On-chip integration challenges, including phase stability and material losses, remain the next practical hurdles to test.

Load-bearing premise

Recent gains in metasurface control will scale laboratory linear demonstrations into practical reconfigurable nonlinear and quantum multidimensional systems.

What would settle it

An experiment showing that metasurfaces cannot sustain reconfigurable nonlinear operations across multiple dimensions would refute the claimed pathway to advanced meta-processors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16849 by Jumin Qiu, Qiegen Liu, Shuyuan Xiao, Tingting Liu, Xintong Shi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic overview of our review in the development o [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Representative architectures for Fourier-domain fi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Non-resonant platforms for nonlocal spatial-domai [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Resonant metasurface platforms for nonlocal spatia [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Interferometric difference platforms leveraging spi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Spiral-phase spatial filtering systems leveraging s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Advanced meta-processors enabling parallel and mul [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Dynamically reconfigurable meta-processors for swi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Advanced meta-processors for nonlinear and quantum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

As the explosive growth of visual data increasingly strains the latency and energy limits of conventional electronic computing, optical analog computing has re-emerged as a disruptive paradigm for zero-power, speed-of-light information processing. Propelled by the unprecedented wave-manipulation capabilities of optical metasurfaces, this field is undergoing a rapid transition from macroscopic physical optics to ultra-compact, on-chip meta-processors. This Review examines the fundamental mechanisms of metasurface-empowered optical computing spanning Fourier-domain, nonlocal spatial-domain, and interferometric architectures that perform mathematical operations, with a particular focus on spatial differentiation and edge detection as representative computing tasks. By emphasizing recent breakthroughs, we highlight the evolution of meta-processors from static, linear regimes to dynamically reconfigurable, nonlinear, and quantum-assisted multidimensional platforms. We also envision how the synergy of AI-driven inverse design and the integration of analog meta-front-ends with optical neural networks will synergistically revolutionize next-generation intelligent machine vision.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. This review examines metasurface-based optical analog computing, covering Fourier-domain, nonlocal spatial-domain, and interferometric architectures for mathematical operations such as spatial differentiation and edge detection. It traces the field's evolution from static linear demonstrations to reconfigurable, nonlinear, and quantum-assisted multidimensional platforms, drawing on cited literature, and envisions the synergy of AI-driven inverse design with analog meta-front-ends and optical neural networks for advancing intelligent machine vision.

Significance. If the literature synthesis is accurate and balanced, the review could serve as a useful consolidation of mechanisms and trends in flat optics for computing, potentially guiding researchers toward energy-efficient, high-speed optical processors. The structured categorization of architectures and the forward-looking integration of AI with optical systems represent a strength in identifying promising directions, though the manuscript advances no original derivations, data, or experimental validations.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The characterization of optical analog computing as 'zero-power' should be qualified, as metasurface-based systems typically incur optical losses; this nuance is important for accurate claims about energy efficiency compared to electronic alternatives.
  2. [Conclusion or equivalent] Vision/envisaging section: The assertion that AI-driven inverse design and meta-front-end integration 'will synergistically revolutionize' machine vision is forward-looking but would benefit from a brief acknowledgment of remaining challenges, such as scalability from lab demonstrations to practical nonlinear and quantum platforms, to strengthen the perspective.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our review on metasurface-based optical analog computing architectures. The summary accurately reflects the manuscript's scope, from fundamental mechanisms in Fourier, nonlocal, and interferometric designs to emerging reconfigurable, nonlinear, and quantum platforms. We appreciate the recognition of the structured categorization and the envisioned synergy with AI-driven inverse design. Since the recommendation is for minor revision and no specific major comments were provided, we will use the opportunity to verify and balance the literature synthesis for accuracy.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; review summarizes external literature without self-referential derivations

full rationale

This is a review paper that examines mechanisms from cited external works on metasurface-based optical computing (Fourier-domain, nonlocal, interferometric architectures) and envisions future synergies with AI inverse design. No original equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or proofs are presented that could reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. All claims trace to independent cited literature rather than self-citation chains or redefinitions within the manuscript itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review article, the paper introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it aggregates and describes concepts from existing metasurface and optical computing literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5470 in / 1009 out tokens · 45995 ms · 2026-05-10T07:03:43.745777+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

136 extracted references · 136 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B. J. Shastri, A. N. Tait, T. Ferreira de Lima, W. H. P. Pern ice, H. Bhaskaran, C. D. Wright, and P. R. Prucnal, Photonics for artificial intelligence and neuromorphic computing, Nat. Photonics 15, 102 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    P. L. McMahon, The physics of optical computing, Nat. Rev . Phys. 5, 717 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Shekhar, W

    S. Shekhar, W. Bogaerts, L. Chrostowski, J. E. Bowers, M. Hochberg, R. Soref, and B. J. Shastri, Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photon ics, Nat. Commun. 15, 751 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Yu and F

    N. Yu and F. Capasso, Flat optics with designer metasurfa ces, Nat. Mater. 13, 139 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    H.-T. Chen, A. J. Taylor, and N. Yu, A review of metasurfac es: physics and applications, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 076401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    J. Hu, S. Bandyopadhyay, Y.-h. Liu, and L.-y. Shao, A revi ew on metasurface: From principle to smart metadevices, Front. Phys. 8, 586087 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Y. Fu, X. Zhou, Y. Yu, J. Chen, S. Wang, S. Zhu, and Z. Wang, U nleashing the potential: Ai empowered advanced metasurface research, Nanophotonic s 13, 1239 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Silva, F

    A. Silva, F. Monticone, G. Castaldi, V. Galdi, A. Al` u, an d N. Engheta, Performing mathe- matical operations with metamaterials, Science 343, 160 (2014)

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Abdollahramezani, O

    S. Abdollahramezani, O. Hemmatyar, and A. Adibi, Meta-o ptics for spatial optical analog computing, Nanophotonics 9, 4075 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Zangeneh-Nejad, D

    F. Zangeneh-Nejad, D. L. Sounas, A. Al` u, and R. Fleury, Analogue computing with meta- materials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 207 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    J. Wu, X. Lin, Y. Guo, J. Liu, L. Fang, S. Jiao, and Q. Dai, A nalog optical computing for artificial intelligence, Engineering 10, 133 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Badloe, S

    T. Badloe, S. Lee, and J. Rho, Computation at the speed of light: metamaterials for all- 44 optical calculations and neural networks, Adv. Photonics 4, 064002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    S. He, R. Wang, and H. Luo, Computing metasurfaces for al l-optical image processing: a brief review, Nanophotonics 11, 1083 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    D. Xu, S. Wen, and H. Luo, Metasurface-based optical ana log computing: From fundamentals to applications, Adv. Devices Instrum. 2022, 0002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    X. Wang, H. Hao, X. He, P. Xie, J. Liu, J. Tan, H. Li, H. Wang , P. Genevet, Y. Luo, X. Ding, and G. Hu, Advances in information processing and biologica l imaging using flat optics, Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 1, 391 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    H. Zhou, C. Zhao, C. He, L. Huang, T. Man, and Y. Wan, Optic al computing metasurfaces: applications and advances, Nanophotonics 13, 419 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    C. Zhou, Y. Wang, and L. Huang, All-optical analog differe ntial operation and information processing empowered by meta-devices, Nanophotonics 14, 1021 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    X. Cui, S. He, Z. Li, T. Chen, X. Zhang, Y. Sun, Y. Wu, J. Gua n, and J. Hu, Metasurfaces for edge detection and spatial differentiation in free space, Adv . Funct. Mater. , e74788 (2026)

    work page 2026

  19. [19]

    W. Fu, D. Zhao, Z. Li, S. Liu, C. Tian, and K. Huang, Ultrac ompact meta-imagers for arbitrary all-optical convolution, Light Sci. Appl. 11, 62 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Z. Wang, G. Hu, X. Wang, X. Ding, K. Zhang, H. Li, S. N. Buro kur, Q. Wu, J. Liu, J. Tan, and C.-W. Qiu, Single-layer spatial analog meta-pro cessor for imaging processing, Nat. Commun. 13, 2188 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Cotrufo, A

    M. Cotrufo, A. Arora, S. Singh, and A. Al` u, Dispersion e ngineered metasurfaces for broad- band, high-na, high-efficiency, dual-polarization analog i mage processing, Nat. Commun. 14, 7078 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    J. Zhou, H. Qian, C.-F. Chen, J. Zhao, G. Li, Q. Wu, H. Luo, S. Wen, and Z. Liu, Optical edge detection based on high-efficiency dielectric metasurf ace, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 11137 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    M. Zong, Y. Liu, J. Lv, S. Zhang, and Z. Xu, Two-dimension al optical differentiator for broadband edge detection based on dielectric metasurface, Opt. Lett. 48, 1902 (2023)

    work page 1902

  24. [24]

    Ritsch-Marte, Orbital angular momentum light in mic roscopy, Philos

    M. Ritsch-Marte, Orbital angular momentum light in mic roscopy, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 375, 20150437 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    P. Huo, C. Zhang, W. Zhu, M. Liu, S. Zhang, S. Zhang, L. Che n, H. J. Lezec, A. Agrawal, Y. Lu, and T. Xu, Photonic spin-multiplexing metasurface fo r switchable spiral phase contrast 45 imaging, Nano Lett. 20, 2791 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    Y. Kim, G. Lee, J. Sung, J. Jang, and B. Lee, Spiral metale ns for phase contrast imaging, Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2106050 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Rajabalipanah, A

    H. Rajabalipanah, A. Abdolali, S. Iqbal, L. Zhang, and T . J. Cui, Analog signal processing through space-time digital metasurfaces, Nanophotonics 10, 1753 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Y. Zhou, J. Zhan, Z. Xu, Y. Shao, Y. Wang, Y. Dang, S. Zhang , and Y. Ma, Electromagnetic spatiotemporal differentiation meta-devices, Laser Photon ics Rev. 17, 2300182 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Y. Zhou, J. Zhan, Y. Shao, Y. Wang, Y. Dang, S. Zhang, H. E. Hernandez-Figueroa, and Y. Ma, Reconfigurable spatiotemporal optical signal pro cessors, Adv. Opt. Mater. 11, 2300746 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    M. Deng, M. Cotrufo, J. Wang, J. Dong, Z. Ruan, A. Al` u, an d L. Chen, Broadband angular spectrum differentiation using dielectric metasurfaces, Na t. Commun. 15, 2237 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    M. Deng, S. Kanwal, Z. Wang, C. Cai, Y. Cheng, J. Guan, G. H u, J. Wang, J. Wen, and L. Chen, Dielectric metasurfaces for broadband phase-cont rast relief-like imaging, Nano Lett. 24, 14641 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Monticone, N

    F. Monticone, N. M. Estakhri, and A. Al` u, Full control o f nanoscale optical transmission with a composite metascreen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 203903 (2013)

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    Farmahini-Farahani, J

    M. Farmahini-Farahani, J. Cheng, and H. Mosallaei, Met asurfaces nanoantennas for light processing, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30, 2365 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    A. Pors, M. G. Nielsen, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, Analog com puting using reflective plasmonic metasurfaces, Nano Lett. 15, 791 (2015)

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    Abdollahramezani, A

    S. Abdollahramezani, A. Chizari, A. E. Dorche, M. V. Jam ali, and J. A. Salehi, Dielectric metasurfaces solve differential and integro-differential equ ations, Opt. Lett. 42, 1197 (2017)

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Z. Wang, T. Li, A. Soman, D. Mao, T. Kananen, and T. Gu, On- chip wavefront shaping with dielectric metasurface, Nat. Commun. 10, 3547 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    AbdollahRamezani, K

    S. AbdollahRamezani, K. Arik, A. Khavasi, and Z. Kavehv ash, Analog computing using graphene-based metalines, Opt. Lett. 40, 5239 (2015)

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    Chizari, S

    A. Chizari, S. Abdollahramezani, M. V. Jamali, and J. A. Salehi, Analog optical computing based on a dielectric meta-reflect array, Opt. Lett. 41, 3451 (2016)

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    H. Chen, D. An, Z. Li, and X. Zhao, Performing differential operation with a silver dendritic metasurface at visible wavelengths, Opt. Express 25, 26417 (2017). 46

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    H. Chen, D. An, and X. Zhao, Quasi-periodic dendritic me tasurface for integral operation in visible light, Molecules 25, 1664 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    L. Bao, R. Y. Wu, X. Fu, and T. J. Cui, Mathematical operat ions of transmissive near fields controlled by metasurface with phase and amplitude modulat ions, Ann. Phys. 532, 2000069 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    X. Yang, D. Wang, H. Ren, S. Zhou, Z. Wang, and S. Chen, Opt ical analog cross-correlation computing for pattern recognition based on a dielectric met asurface, Opt. Lett. 50, 3736 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Youssefi, F

    A. Youssefi, F. Zangeneh-Nejad, S. Abdollahramezani, a nd A. Khavasi, Analog computing by brewster effect, Opt. Lett. 41, 3467 (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    Wesemann, E

    L. Wesemann, E. Panchenko, K. Singh, E. Della Gaspera, D . E. G´ omez, T. J. Davis, and A. Roberts, Selective near-perfect absorbing mirror as a sp atial frequency filter for optical image processing, APL Photonics 4, 100801 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Jin and Y

    C. Jin and Y. Yang, Transmissive nonlocal multilayer th in film optical filter for image differ- entiation, Nanophotonics 10, 3519 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Zhang, B

    X. Zhang, B. Bai, H. Sun, G. Jin, and J. Valentine, Incohe rent optoelectronic differentiation based on optimized multilayer films, Laser Photonics Rev. 16, 2200038 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Y. Liu, M. Huang, Q. Chen, and D. Zhang, Single planar pho tonic chip with tailored angular transmission for multiple-order analog spatial differentia tor, Nat. Commun. 13, 7944 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Zangeneh-Nejad and A

    F. Zangeneh-Nejad and A. Khavasi, Spatial integration by a dielectric slab and its planar graphene-based counterpart, Opt. Lett. 42, 1954 (2017)

    work page 1954

  49. [49]

    Zangeneh-Nejad, A

    F. Zangeneh-Nejad, A. Khavasi, and B. Rejaei, Analog op tical computing by half-wavelength slabs, Opt. Commun. 407, 338 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    D. Xu, S. He, J. Zhou, S. Chen, S. Wen, and H. Luo, Optical a nalog computing of two- dimensional spatial differentiation based on the brewster effe ct, Opt. Lett. 45, 6867 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    W. Wu, W. Jiang, J. Yang, S. Gong, and Y. Ma, Multilayered analog optical differentiating device: performance analysis on structural parameters, Op t. Lett. 42, 5270 (2017)

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    Xue and O

    W. Xue and O. D. Miller, High-na optical edge detection v ia optimized multilayer films, J. Opt. 23, 125004 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Abdolali, A

    A. Abdolali, A. Momeni, H. Rajabalipanah, and K. Achour i, Parallel integro-differential equation solving via multi-channel reciprocal bianisotro pic metasurface augmented by normal 47 susceptibilities, New J. Phys. 21, 113048 (2019)

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    Babaee, A

    A. Babaee, A. Momeni, A. Abdolali, and R. Fleury, Parall el analog computing based on a 2× 2 multiple-input multiple-output metasurface processor w ith asymmetric response, Phys. Rev. Applied 15, 044015 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    T. Zhu, Y. Zhou, Y. Lou, H. Ye, M. Qiu, Z. Ruan, and S. Fan, P lasmonic computing of spatial differentiation, Nat. Commun. 8, 15391 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    D. A. Bykov, L. L. Doskolovich, A. A. Morozov, V. V. Podli pnov, E. A. Bezus, P. Verma, and V. A. Soifer, First-order optical spatial differentiator based on a guided-mode resonant grating, Opt. Express 26, 10997 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    C. Guo, M. Xiao, M. Minkov, Y. Shi, and S. Fan, Photonic cr ystal slab laplace operator for image differentiation, Optica 5, 251 (2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    H. Kwon, D. Sounas, A. Cordaro, A. Polman, and A. Al` u, No nlocal metasurfaces for optical signal processing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 173004 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Komar, R

    A. Komar, R. A. Aoni, L. Xu, M. Rahmani, A. E. Miroshniche nko, and D. N. Neshev, Edge detection with mie-resonant dielectric metasurfaces, ACS Photonics 8, 864 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Y. Zhou, H. Zheng, I. I. Kravchenko, and J. Valentine, Fl at optics for image differentiation, Nat. Photonics 14, 316 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    T. Liu, J. Qiu, L. Xu, M. Qin, L. Wan, T. Yu, Q. Liu, L. Huang , and S. Xiao, Edge detection imaging by quasi-bound states in the continuum, Nano Lett. 24, 14466 (2024)

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    C. Zhou, R. Zhao, P. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. Chen, G. Geng, J. Li, X . Li, Y. Wang, and L. Huang, Dual-polarized broadband laplace differentiator via quasi- bound states in the continuum empowered by nonlocal metasurfaces, Adv. Funct. Mater. 35, 2426095 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Y. Fang, Y. Lou, and Z. Ruan, On-grating graphene surfac e plasmons enabling spatial dif- ferentiation in the terahertz region, Opt. Lett. 42, 3840 (2017)

    work page 2017

  64. [64]

    Hwang, T

    Y. Hwang, T. J. Davis, J. Lin, and X.-C. Yuan, Plasmonic c ircuit for second-order spatial differentiation at the subwavelength scale, Opt. Express 26, 7368 (2018)

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    Roberts, D

    A. Roberts, D. E. G´ omez, and T. J. Davis, Optical image p rocessing with metasurface dark modes, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 35, 1575 (2018)

    work page 2018

  66. [66]

    Zhang, Q

    J. Zhang, Q. Ying, and Z. Ruan, Time response of plasmoni c spatial differentiators, Opt. Lett. 44, 4511 (2019)

    work page 2019

  67. [67]

    Y. Lou, Y. Fang, and Z. Ruan, Optical computation of dive rgence operation for vector fields, 48 Phys. Rev. Applied 14, 034013 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    D. A. Bykov, L. L. Doskolovich, E. A. Bezus, and V. A. Soif er, Optical computation of the laplace operator using phase-shifted bragg grating, Opt. E xpress 22, 25084 (2014)

    work page 2014

  69. [69]

    A. Saba, M. R. Tavakol, P. Karimi-Khoozani, and A. Khava si, Two-dimensional edge detec- tion by guided mode resonant metasurface, IEEE Photonics Te chnol. Lett. 30, 853 (2018)

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    Fang and Z

    Y. Fang and Z. Ruan, Optical spatial differentiator for a s ynthetic three-dimensional optical field, Opt. Lett. 43, 5893 (2018)

    work page 2018

  71. [71]

    E. A. Bezus, L. L. Doskolovich, D. A. Bykov, and V. A. Soif er, Spatial integration and differentiation of optical beams in a slab waveguide by a diele ctric ridge supporting high-q resonances, Opt. Express 26, 25156 (2018)

    work page 2018

  72. [72]

    O. Y. Long, C. Guo, W. Jin, and S. Fan, Polarization-inde pendent isotropic nonlocal meta- surfaces with wavelength-controlled functionality, Phys . Rev. Applied 17, 024029 (2022)

    work page 2022

  73. [73]

    Cordaro, H

    A. Cordaro, H. Kwon, D. Sounas, A. F. Koenderink, A. Al` u , and A. Polman, High-index dielectric metasurfaces performing mathematical operati ons, Nano Lett. 19, 8418 (2019)

    work page 2019

  74. [74]

    H. Kwon, A. Cordaro, D. Sounas, A. Polman, and A. Al` u, Du al-polarization analog 2d image processing with nonlocal metasurfaces, ACS Photonics 7, 1799 (2020)

    work page 2020

  75. [75]

    Cotrufo, S

    M. Cotrufo, S. Singh, A. Arora, A. Majewski, and A. Al` u, Polarization imaging and edge detection with image-processing metasurfaces, Optica 10, 1331 (2023)

    work page 2023

  76. [76]

    Y. Zhou, W. Wu, R. Chen, W. Chen, R. Chen, and Y. Ma, Analog optical spatial differen- tiators based on dielectric metasurfaces, Adv. Opt. Mater. 8, 1901523 (2019)

    work page 2019

  77. [77]

    L. Wan, D. Pan, S. Yang, W. Zhang, A. A. Potapov, X. Wu, W. L iu, T. Feng, and Z. Li, Optical analog computing of spatial differentiation and edge detection with dielectric meta- surfaces, Opt. Lett. 45, 2070 (2020)

    work page 2070

  78. [78]

    Y. Liu, X. Li, B. Shi, Q. Jia, Y. Zhang, Y. Gao, W. Gao, F. Su n, Y. Cao, R. Feng, and W. Ding, Polarization-independent, high-na edge detectio n with nonlocal metasurfaces, Opt. Lett. 50, 3517 (2025)

    work page 2025

  79. [79]

    Goh and A

    H. Goh and A. Al` u, Nonlocal scatterer for compact wave- based analog computing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 073201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  80. [80]

    C. Zhou, Y. Chen, Y. Li, J. Li, R. Zhao, C. Tao, C. Liu, Y. Ba i, X. Li, Y. Wang, and L. Huang, Laplace differentiator based on metasurface with to roidal dipole resonance, Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2313777 (2024). 49

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.