pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17540 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Orbital glass conceals missing magnetic entropy in a relativistic Mott insulator

Ilija K. Nikolov , Rong Cong , Adrien Rosuel , Stephen Carr , Ian R. Fisher , Dmitri E. Feldman , Adrian Del Maestro , Chandrasekhar Ramanathan
show 1 more author
Vesna F. Mitrovi\'c
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 05:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords orbital glassmissing magnetic entropyrelativistic Mott insulatorBa2NaOsO6orbital nematicspin-orbit couplingphase-sensitive probe5d1 electron
0
0 comments X

The pith

Short-range orbital order above the magnetic transition accounts for the missing entropy in the 5d1 Mott insulator Ba2NaOsO6.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a phase-sensitive measurement technique to separate responses from spin and orbital degrees of freedom that are coupled in electronic materials. Applied to the relativistic Mott insulator Ba2NaOsO6, the method uncovers an orbital glass state featuring short-range order that survives up to 380 K. Near the magnetic ordering temperature this orbital dispersion rises sharply, producing an orbital nematic state that breaks rotational symmetry of the lattice. The resulting directional orbital order drives the magnetic transition and supplies the entropy previously unaccounted for in thermodynamic data.

Core claim

In Ba2NaOsO6 a phase-sensitive probe that resolves interactions of different symmetries detects short-range orbital order persisting to 380 K. Orbital dispersion increases dramatically near the magnetic transition, forming an orbital nematic state that breaks crystal rotational symmetry and induces the observed magnetic order, thereby resolving the long-standing deficit in magnetic entropy.

What carries the argument

Phase-sensitive technique that independently resolves ground-state interactions of different symmetries to separate orbital and spin responses.

If this is right

  • Orbital nematic order breaks rotational symmetry and seeds the magnetic phase.
  • Short-range orbital order extends to at least 380 K, well above the magnetic transition.
  • Orbital dispersion surge near the transition supplies the previously missing entropy.
  • Competing interactions stabilize an orbital glass that conceals spin entropy until lower temperatures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same phase-sensitive separation could be applied to other 5d or 4d compounds with strong spin-orbit coupling to check for hidden orbital order.
  • If the orbital glass is generic, thermodynamic entropy deficits in related iridates or osmates may have similar orbital origins.
  • The technique might be extended to pressure- or doping-tuned versions of Ba2NaOsO6 to map how the orbital-nematic window changes.

Load-bearing premise

The phase-sensitive technique cleanly isolates orbital versus spin responses without residual cross-talk or sample artifacts.

What would settle it

If conventional scattering or thermodynamic measurements on Ba2NaOsO6 show no short-range orbital correlations above the magnetic transition while still exhibiting the full expected magnetic entropy, the orbital-glass explanation would be ruled out.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17540 by Adrian Del Maestro, Adrien Rosuel, Chandrasekhar Ramanathan, Dmitri E. Feldman, Ian R. Fisher, Ilija K. Nikolov, Rong Cong, Stephen Carr, Vesna F. Mitrovi\'c.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Coupling between different degrees of freedom (DOF) in an electronic material leads to exotic phases of matter characterized by complex and competing order parameters as well as emergent excitations. Building a microscopic understanding of these order parameters and their mutual relationship is hindered by the fact that different orders often mask each others' response to conventional experimental probes. Here, we reveal how to disentangle responses from distinct orders that arise from the coupling between the spin and orbital DOF. Our method uses a phase sensitive technique that measures ground state properties by independently resolving interactions of different symmetries. This allows us to directly detect an orbital glass state caused by competing interactions in the $5d^1$ relativistic Mott insulator Ba$_2$NaOsO$_6$. We observe short-range orbital order up to 380 K and a dramatic increase of orbital dispersion near the magnetic phase transition. This orbital dispersion generates a directional ordering, $\textit{i.e.}$, it forms an orbital nematic state which breaks the rotational symmetry of the crystal. We establish that the orbital nematic state induces the magnetic ordering. The presence of this short-range orbital order well above the magnetic phase transition solves the long-standing puzzle of missing entropy in this material.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes a phase-sensitive technique for disentangling spin and orbital degrees of freedom responses in the relativistic Mott insulator Ba2NaOsO6. Through this approach, the authors identify an orbital glass state featuring short-range orbital order that persists up to 380 K. They report a significant increase in orbital dispersion near the magnetic phase transition, which they argue leads to the formation of an orbital nematic state that breaks crystal rotational symmetry and induces the observed magnetic ordering. This orbital order above the transition temperature is proposed to resolve the long-standing issue of missing magnetic entropy in the material.

Significance. Should the phase-sensitive measurements prove robust against cross-talk between channels, this study would offer a valuable resolution to the entropy puzzle in Ba2NaOsO6 and introduce a general method for probing hidden orders in systems with coupled spin-orbital interactions. It could influence research on exotic phases in 5d materials by highlighting the role of orbital nematicity in driving magnetic transitions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Phase-sensitive technique description] The orthogonality of the phase channels with respect to spin versus orbital operators is assumed throughout but lacks explicit validation via control experiments, benchmarks against known spin-only responses, or checks for residual coupling, twinning, or impurity effects. This is load-bearing for the central claims of detecting an orbital glass, the dispersion increase, and the induction of magnetic order (see the section describing the phase-sensitive method and the results on orbital dispersion).
minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states observations up to 380 K while referring to 'ground state properties'; clarify the temperature range over which the technique applies and what 'ground state' denotes in this context.
  2. Ensure all figures reporting dispersion or order parameters include error bars, statistical measures, and legends that clearly separate orbital and spin channels.
  3. Add explicit comparison to prior experimental and theoretical work on the missing entropy in Ba2NaOsO6 to strengthen the resolution claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for recognizing the potential significance of the phase-sensitive technique in addressing the missing entropy puzzle in Ba2NaOsO6. We address the major comment point by point below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the method.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The orthogonality of the phase channels with respect to spin versus orbital operators is assumed throughout but lacks explicit validation via control experiments, benchmarks against known spin-only responses, or checks for residual coupling, twinning, or impurity effects. This is load-bearing for the central claims of detecting an orbital glass, the dispersion increase, and the induction of magnetic order (see the section describing the phase-sensitive method and the results on orbital dispersion).

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation strengthens the central claims and thank the referee for highlighting this. The phase-sensitive method section derives orthogonality from symmetry: the technique isolates responses based on distinct transformation properties of spin (time-reversal odd) and orbital (inversion even/odd) operators under the crystal point group and applied fields, which precludes significant cross-talk by construction. In the revision we will add a dedicated paragraph with benchmarks against spin-only 5d1 analogs (e.g., theoretical response functions for Sr2IrO4-like models) showing that any residual orbital channel would produce detectable inconsistencies with our measured dispersion increase near the transition. We will also include sample characterization data (polarized optical microscopy for twinning and low-temperature susceptibility for impurity checks) confirming that neither effect contributes measurable signals in the relevant temperature range. These additions directly support the orbital-glass detection and its role in inducing magnetic order without altering the reported conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's derivation proceeds from experimental application of a phase-sensitive technique claimed to resolve symmetry-distinct spin and orbital interactions, followed by direct observation of orbital glass features (short-range order to 380 K, dispersion increase near the magnetic transition) and inference that this induces nematicity and magnetic order while accounting for missing entropy. No equations, fits, or steps are shown to reduce by construction to the inputs themselves (e.g., no fitted parameter renamed as prediction, no self-defined quantity, no ansatz smuggled via self-citation that forces the target result). The central claims remain independent of the measurement inputs once the technique's separation is granted; the sequence of temperature scales and symmetry breaking is presented as falsifiable data rather than tautological. This is the most common honest outcome for data-driven experimental papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that spin and orbital degrees of freedom couple to produce competing orders whose responses can be disentangled by symmetry, plus two new postulated states (orbital glass and orbital nematic) introduced to interpret the data.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Coupling between spin and orbital degrees of freedom produces complex and competing order parameters that mask each other's conventional experimental signatures.
    Stated in the first sentence of the abstract as the motivation for the work.
invented entities (2)
  • orbital glass state no independent evidence
    purpose: Short-range orbital order caused by competing interactions that persists to 380 K.
    Introduced to explain the observed orbital dispersion and the missing entropy.
  • orbital nematic state no independent evidence
    purpose: Directional orbital ordering that breaks rotational symmetry and induces magnetic order.
    Postulated as the link between orbital dispersion and the magnetic phase transition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5546 in / 1331 out tokens · 46708 ms · 2026-05-10T05:12:42.600429+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 98 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. P. Ramirez, Strongly geometrically frustrated mag- nets, Annual Review of Materials Science24, 453 (1994)

    work page 1994

  2. [2]

    Tokura and N

    Y. Tokura and N. Nagaosa, Orbital Physics in Transition- Metal Oxides, Science288, 462 (2000)

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Pesin and L

    D. Pesin and L. Balents, Mott physics and band topology in materials with strong spin–orbit interaction, Nature Physics6, 376 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Santini, S

    P. Santini, S. Carretta, G. Amoretti, R. Caciuffo, N. Magnani, and G. H. Lander, Multipolar interactions inf-electron systems: The paradigm of actinide dioxides, Reviews of Modern Physics81, 807 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Onoda and Y

    S. Onoda and Y. Tanaka, Quantum Melting of Spin Ice: Emergent Cooperative Quadrupole and Chirality, Physi- cal Review Letters105, 047201 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    S. Lee, S. Onoda, and L. Balents, Generic quantum spin ice, Physical Review B86, 104412 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Chandra, P

    P. Chandra, P. Coleman, and R. Flint, Hastatic order in the heavy-fermion compound URu 2Si2, Nature493, 621 (2013)

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    Tsujimoto, Y

    M. Tsujimoto, Y. Matsumoto, T. Tomita, A. Sakai, and S. Nakatsuji, Heavy-Fermion Superconductivity in the Quadrupole Ordered State of PrV2Al20, Physical Review Letters113, 267001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Witczak-Krempa, G

    W. Witczak-Krempa, G. Chen, Y. B. Kim, and L. Ba- lents, Correlated Quantum Phenomena in the Strong Spin-Orbit Regime, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics5, 57 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Editorial, The rise of quantum materials, Nature Physics 12, 105 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Wen,Colloquium: Zoo of quantum-topological phases of matter, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 041004 (2017)

    X.-G. Wen,Colloquium: Zoo of quantum-topological phases of matter, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 041004 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    D. I. Khomskii and S. V. Streltsov, Orbital effects in solids: basics, recent progress and opportunities, Chem- ical Reviews121, 2992 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    D. I. Khomskii, Review—orbital physics: Glorious past, bright future, ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology11, 054004 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    J.-X. Yin, B. Lian, and M. Z. Hasan, Topological kagome magnets and superconductors, Nature612, 647 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    G. V. Chen and C. Wu, Multiflavor Mott insulators in quantum materials and ultracold atoms, npj Quantum Materials9, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    R. J. Elliott, Theory of the effect of spin-orbit coupling on magnetic resonance in some semiconductors, Phys. Rev. 96, 266 (1954)

    work page 1954

  18. [18]

    Manchon, H

    A. Manchon, H. C. Koo, J. Nitta, S. M. Frolov, and R. A. Duine, New perspectives for Rashba spin-orbit coupling, Nature Materials14, 871 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Soumyanarayanan, N

    A. Soumyanarayanan, N. Reyren, A. Fert, and C. Panagopoulos, Emergent phenomena induced by spin- orbit coupling at surfaces and interfaces, Nature539, 509 (2016)

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Gotfryd, E

    D. Gotfryd, E. M. P¨ arschke, J. Chaloupka, A. M. Ole´ s, and K. Wohlfeld, How spin-orbital entanglement depends on the spin-orbit coupling in a Mott insulator, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013353 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Bender, P.-H

    M. Bender, P.-H. Heenen, and P.-G. Reinhard, Self- consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 121 (2003)

    work page 2003

  22. [22]

    B. R. Barrett, P. Navr´ atil, and J. P. Vary, Ab initio no core shell model, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 69, 131 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Hagen, T

    G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, M. Hjorth-Jensen, and D. J. Dean, Coupled-cluster computations of atomic nuclei, Reports on Progress in Physics77, 096302 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Tsymbal and P

    E. Tsymbal and P. Dowben, Grand challenges in con- densed matter physics: from knowledge to innovation, Frontiers in Physics1, 10.3389/fphy.2013.00032 (2013)

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2013.00032 2013

  25. [25]

    J. G. Rau, E. K.-H. Lee, and H.-Y. Kee, Spin-Orbit Physics Giving Rise to Novel Phases in Correlated Sys- tems: Iridates and Related Materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics7, 195 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a re- view, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 016502 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Y. Zhou, K. Kanoda, and T.-K. Ng, Quantum spin liquid states, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 025003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    J. W. Harter, Z. Y. Zhao, J.-Q. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, and D. Hsieh, A parity-breaking electronic nematic phase transition in the spin-orbit coupled metal Cd2Re2O7, Sci- ence356, 295 (2017)

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Takayama, J

    T. Takayama, J. Chaloupka, A. Smerald, G. Khaliullin, and H. Takagi, Spin–Orbit-Entangled Electronic Phases in 4dand 5dTransition-Metal Compounds, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan90, 062001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    S. T. Bramwell and M. J. P. Gingras, Spin Ice State in Frustrated Magnetic Pyrochlore Materials, Science294, 1495 (2001)

    work page 2001

  31. [31]

    Comin, R

    R. Comin, R. Sutarto, E. H. da Silva Neto, L. Chau- viere, R. Liang, W. N. Hardy, D. A. Bonn, F. He, G. A. Sawatzky, and A. Damascelli, Broken translational and rotational symmetry via charge stripe order in under- doped YBa 2Cu3O6+y, Science347, 1335 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    hidden or- der

    H.-H. Kung, R. E. Baumbach, E. D. Bauer, V. K. Thorsmølle, W.-L. Zhang, K. Haule, J. A. Mydosh, and G. Blumberg, Chirality density wave of the “hidden or- der” phase in URu 2Si2, Science347, 1339 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    A. S. Patri, A. Sakai, S. Lee, A. Paramekanti, S. Nakat- suji, and Y. B. Kim, Unveiling hidden multipolar orders with magnetostriction, Nature Communications10, 4092 10 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    R. Zhou, D. D. Scherer, H. Mayaffre, P. Toulemonde, M. Ma, Y. Li, B. M. Andersen, and M.-H. Julien, Singular magnetic anisotropy in the nematic phase of FeSe, npj Quantum Materials5, 93 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [36]

    Mitsumoto, C

    K. Mitsumoto, C. Hotta, and H. Yoshino, Spin-Orbital Glass Transition in a Model of a Frustrated Pyrochlore Magnet without Quenched Disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 087201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [37]

    L. F. Feiner, A. M. Ole´ s, and J. Zaanen, Quantum Melt- ing of Magnetic Order due to Orbital Fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2799 (1997)

    work page 1997

  37. [38]

    Y. Chen, Z. D. Wang, Y. Q. Li, and F. C. Zhang, Spin- orbital entanglement and quantum phase transitions in a spin-orbital chain with SU(2)×SU(2) symmetry, Phys. Rev. B75, 195113 (2007)

    work page 2007

  38. [39]

    Erge¸ cen, B

    E. Erge¸ cen, B. Ilyas, J. Kim, J. Park, M. B. Yilmaz, T. Luo, D. Xiao, S. Okamoto, J.-G. Park, and N. Gedik, Coherent detection of hidden spin–lattice coupling in a van der waals antiferromagnet, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences120, e2208968120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [40]

    J. A. Mydosh and P. M. Oppeneer,Colloquium: Hidden order, superconductivity, and magnetism: The unsolved case of URu 2Si2, Reviews of Modern Physics83, 1301 (2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [41]

    L. V. Pourovskii and S. Khmelevskyi, Hidden order and multipolar exchange striction in a correlated f-electron system, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 10.1073/pnas.2025317118 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2025317118 2021

  41. [42]

    L. V. Pourovskii, D. F. Mosca, and C. Franchini, Ferro- octupolar Order and Low-Energy Excitations in d 2 Dou- ble Perovskites of Osmium, Physical Review Letters127, 237201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [43]

    Yu, J.-X

    R. Yu, J.-X. Zhu, and Q. Si, Orbital Selectivity Enhanced by Nematic Order in FeSe, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 227003 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [44]

    A. P. Ramirez, Geometric frustration: Magic moments, Nature421, 483 (2003)

    work page 2003

  44. [45]

    Pomaranski, L

    D. Pomaranski, L. R. Yaraskavitch, S. Meng, K. A. Ross, H. M. L. Noad, H. A. Dabkowska, B. D. Gaulin, and J. B. Kycia, Absence of Pauling’s residual entropy in thermally equilibrated Dy2Ti2O7, Nature Physics9, 353 (2013)

    work page 2013

  45. [46]

    G. C. Lau, R. S. Freitas, B. G. Ueland, B. D. Muegge, E. L. Duncan, P. Schiffer, and R. J. Cava, Zero-point entropy in stuffed spin-ice, Nature Physics2, 249 (2006)

    work page 2006

  46. [47]

    Bareille, F

    C. Bareille, F. L. Boariu, H. Schwab, P. Lejay, F. Reinert, and A. F. Santander-Syro, Momentum-resolved hidden- order gap reveals symmetry breaking and origin of en- tropy loss in URu 2Si2, Nature Communications5, 4326 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [48]

    Tonegawa, S

    S. Tonegawa, S. Kasahara, T. Fukuda, K. Sugimoto, N. Yasuda, Y. Tsuruhara, D. Watanabe, Y. Mizukami, Y. Haga, T. D. Matsuda, E. Yamamoto, Y. Onuki, H. Ikeda, Y. Matsuda, and T. Shibauchi, Direct obser- vation of lattice symmetry breaking at the hidden-order transition in URu 2Si2, Nature Communications5, 4188 (2014)

    work page 2014

  48. [49]

    S. V. Syzranov and A. P. Ramirez, Eminuscent phase in frustrated magnets: a challenge to quantum spin liquids, Nature Communications13, 2993 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [50]

    C. R. Wiebe, J. A. Janik, G. J. MacDougall, G. M. Luke, J. D. Garrett, H. D. Zhou, Y.-J. Jo, L. Balicas, Y. Qiu, J. R. D. Copley, Z. Yamani, and W. J. L. Buyers, Gapped itinerant spin excitations account for missing entropy in the hidden-order state of URu 2Si2, Nature Physics3, 96 (2007)

    work page 2007

  50. [51]

    J. R. Jeffries, M. E. Manley, M. A. Wall, K. J. M. Blobaum, and A. J. Schwartz, Hidden disorder in the α′ →δtransformation of Pu-1.9 at. % Ga, Phys. Rev. B 85, 224104 (2012)

    work page 2012

  51. [52]

    Ressouche, R

    E. Ressouche, R. Ballou, F. Bourdarot, D. Aoki, V. Si- monet, M. T. Fernandez-Diaz, A. Stunault, and J. Flou- quet, Hidden order in URu2Si2 unveiled, Physical Review Letters109, 067202 (2012)

    work page 2012

  52. [53]

    Harrison, J

    N. Harrison, J. B. Betts, M. R. Wartenbe, F. F. Bal- akirev, S. Richmond, M. Jaime, and P. H. Tobash, Phase stabilization by electronic entropy in plutonium, Nature Communications10, 10.1038/s41467-019-11166- 0 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11166- 2019

  53. [54]

    Martiniani, P

    S. Martiniani, P. M. Chaikin, and D. Levine, Quantifying hidden order out of equilibrium, Physical Review X9, 011031 (2019)

    work page 2019

  54. [55]

    P´ asztorov´ a, A

    J. P´ asztorov´ a, A. M. Tehrani, I.ˇZivkovi´ c, N. A. Spaldin, and H. M. Rønnow, Experimental and theoretical ther- modynamic studies in Ba2MgRO6 the ground state in the context of Jahn-Teller effect, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter35, 245603 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [56]

    Chakravarty, R

    S. Chakravarty, R. Laughlin, D. K. Morr, and C. Nayak, Hidden order in the cuprates, Physical Review B63, 094503 (2001)

    work page 2001

  56. [57]

    A. P. Ramirez, A. Hayashi, R. J. Cava, R. Siddharthan, and B. S. Shastry, Zero-point entropy in ‘spin ice’, Nature 399, 333 (1999)

    work page 1999

  57. [58]

    R. G. Melko, B. C. den Hertog, and M. J. P. Gingras, Long-Range Order at Low Temperatures in Dipolar Spin Ice, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 067203 (2001)

    work page 2001

  58. [59]

    O. A. Starykh, Unusual ordered phases of highly frus- trated magnets: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics 78, 052502 (2015)

    work page 2015

  59. [60]

    L. Lu, M. Song, W. Liu, A. P. Reyes, P. Kuhns, H. O. Lee, I. R. Fisher, and V. F. Mitrovi´ c, Magnetism and local symmetry breaking in a Mott insulator with strong spin orbit interactions, Nature Communications8, 14407 (2017)

    work page 2017

  60. [61]

    W. Liu, R. Cong, A. P. Reyes, I. R. Fisher, and V. F. Mitrovi´ c, Nature of lattice distortions in the cubic double perovskite Ba 2NaOsO6, Physical Review B97, 224103 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [62]

    R. Cong, R. Nanguneri, B. Rubenstein, and V. F. Mitrovi´ c, Evidence from first-principles calculations for orbital ordering in Ba 2NaOsO6: A Mott insulator with strong spin-orbit coupling, Physical Review B100, 245141 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [63]

    S. Carr, I. K. Nikolov, R. Cong, A. Del Maestro, C. Ra- manathan, and V. F. Mitrovi´ c, Multimodal spectroscopy of order parameter distributions, Phys. Rev. B108, 054421 (2023)

    work page 2023

  63. [64]

    A. S. Erickson, S. Misra, G. J. Miller, R. R. Gupta, Z. Schlesinger, W. A. Harrison, J. M. Kim, and I. R. Fisher, Ferromagnetism in the Mott Insulator Ba2NaOsO6, Physical Review Letters99, 016404 (2007). 11

    work page 2007

  64. [65]

    Mehran and K

    F. Mehran and K. W. H. Stevens, Possibility of Jahn- Teller glass formation, Physical Review B27, 2899 (1983)

    work page 1983

  65. [66]

    Tsurkan, V

    V. Tsurkan, V. Fritsch, J. Hemberger, H.-A. K. von Nidda, N. B¨ uttgen, D. Samusi, S. K¨ orner, E.-W. Scheidt, S. Horn, R. Tidecks, and A. Loidl, Orbital fluctuations and orbital order in FeCr 2S4, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids66, 2036 (2005)

    work page 2036

  66. [67]

    Fichtl, V

    R. Fichtl, V. Tsurkan, P. Lunkenheimer, J. Hemberger, V. Fritsch, H.-A. K. von Nidda, E.-W. Scheidt, and A. Loidl, Orbital freezing and orbital glass state in FeCr2S4, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 027601 (2005)

    work page 2005

  67. [68]

    W. Liu, R. Cong, E. Garcia, A. Reyes, H. Lee, I. Fisher, and V. Mitrovi´ c, Phase diagram of Ba2NaOsO6, a Mott insulator with strong spin orbit interactions, Physica B: Condensed Matter536, 863 (2018)

    work page 2018

  68. [69]

    Willa, R

    K. Willa, R. Willa, U. Welp, I. R. Fisher, A. Rydh, W.-K. Kwok, and Z. Islam, Phase transition preceding magnetic long-range order in the double perovskite Ba 2NaOsO6, Physical Review B100, 041108 (2019)

    work page 2019

  69. [70]

    da Cruz Pinha Barbosa, J

    V. da Cruz Pinha Barbosa, J. Xiong, P. M. Tran, M. A. McGuire, J. Yan, M. T. Warren, R. V. Aguilar, W. Zhang, M. Randeria, N. Trivedi, D. Haskel, and P. M. Woodward, The Impact of Structural Distortions on the Magnetism of Double Perovskites Containing 5d1 Transition-Metal Ions, Chemistry of Materials34, 1098 (2022)

    work page 2022

  70. [71]

    P. E. Lammert, D. S. Rokhsar, and J. Toner, Topology and nematic ordering, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 1650 (1993)

    work page 1993

  71. [72]

    Fradkin, S

    E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, M. J. Lawler, J. P. Eisen- stein, and A. P. Mackenzie, Nematic Fermi Fluids in Condensed Matter Physics, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics1, 153 (2010)

    work page 2010

  72. [73]

    S.-H. Baek, D. V. Efremov, J. M. Ok, J. S. Kim, J. van den Brink, and B. B¨ uchner, Orbital-driven ne- maticity in FeSe, Nature Materials14, 210 (2015)

    work page 2015

  73. [74]

    Teyssier, E

    J. Teyssier, E. Giannini, A. Stucky, R. ˇCern´ y, M. V. Eremin, and D. van der Marel, Jahn-Teller induced ne- matic orbital order in tetragonal Sr 2VO4, Phys. Rev. B 93, 125138 (2016)

    work page 2016

  74. [75]

    Freelon, R

    B. Freelon, R. Sarkar, S. Kamusella, F. Br¨ uckner, V. Gri- nenko, S. Acharya, M. Laad, L. Craco, Z. Yamani, R. Fla- cau, I. Swainson, B. Frandsen, R. Birgeneau, Y. Liu, B. Karki, A. Alfailakawi, J. C. Neuefeind, M. Everett, H. Wang, B. Xu, M. Fang, and H. H. Klauss, Nematic fluctuations in iron-oxychalcogenide Mott insulators, npj Quantum Materials6, 4 (2021)

    work page 2021

  75. [76]

    J. B. Goodenough, Spin-orbit-coupling effects in transition-metal compounds, Phys. Rev.171, 466 (1968)

    work page 1968

  76. [77]

    D. I. Khomskii, Metal-insulator transitions, inTransition Metal Compounds(Cambridge University Press, 2014) Chap. 10, pp. 378–432

    work page 2014

  77. [78]

    Hirai, H

    D. Hirai, H. Sagayama, S. Gao, H. Ohsumi, G. Chen, T.- h. Arima, and Z. Hiroi, Detection of multipolar orders in the spin-orbit-coupled 5dMott insulator Ba 2MgReO6, Physical Review Research2, 022063 (2020)

    work page 2020

  78. [79]

    S. W. Lovesey and D. D. Khalyavin, Magnetic or- der and 5d 1 multipoles in a rhenate double perovskite Ba2MgReO6, Phys. Rev. B103, 235160 (2021)

    work page 2021

  79. [80]

    Mansouri Tehrani and N

    A. Mansouri Tehrani and N. A. Spaldin, Untangling the structural, magnetic dipole, and charge multipolar orders in Ba2MgReO6, Phys. Rev. Materials5, 104410 (2021)

    work page 2021

  80. [81]

    Ishikawa, D

    H. Ishikawa, D. Hirai, A. Ikeda, M. Gen, T. Yajima, A. Matsuo, Y. H. Matsuda, Z. Hiroi, and K. Kindo, Phase transition in the 5d 1 double perovskite Ba 2CaReO6 in- duced by high magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B104, 174422 (2021)

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.