pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17571 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-19 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.app-ph

Leaky-Wave Antenna Analysis using Multi-Modal Network Theory with Open Periodic Boundaries

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 05:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.app-ph
keywords leaky wave antennasperiodic antennasdispersion analysisnetwork theoryperiodic boundariesreceptionunit cell
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hybrid analysis computes dispersion of periodic leaky-wave antennas using one unit-cell simulation

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a hybrid framework of multi-modal network theory with open periodic boundaries for analyzing periodic leaky-wave antennas. It couples a commercial full-wave solver simulation of a single unit cell to an analytical eigenvalue problem to find both phase and attenuation constants. This uses fewer modes than earlier methods and is validated by comparison to full-length antenna simulations. A second method determines the response to an incident plane wave, showing that reception and dispersion analyses are related but not exact time reversals.

Core claim

By simulating one unit cell of a leaky-wave antenna under open periodic boundaries and solving the resulting multi-modal eigenvalue problem analytically, the infinite periodic structure's dispersion diagram is obtained; a parallel formulation gives the receiving characteristics for an incident plane wave.

What carries the argument

The multi-modal network model with open periodic boundaries, in which numerically computed scattering parameters of the unit cell are used to set up and solve an analytical eigenvalue equation for the propagation constants.

If this is right

  • Only a single unit cell needs simulation rather than the entire antenna length.
  • Fewer modes suffice to capture the complex propagation constants accurately.
  • The same framework applies to both dispersion calculation and reception analysis.
  • Reception behavior is linked to but distinct from the transmitting dispersion problem.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Design iterations for leaky-wave antennas could become much faster with this reduced simulation domain.
  • The non-equivalence of reception and time-reversed transmission may apply to other periodic radiating structures with losses.
  • Extension to three-dimensional or non-uniform periodic cells could be tested next.

Load-bearing premise

A single unit-cell simulation with open periodic boundaries combined with the analytical model accurately captures the infinite periodic leaky-wave antenna's behavior without significant boundary-induced artifacts.

What would settle it

Significant differences in the extracted phase or attenuation constants when compared against a full-wave simulation of a long finite-length leaky-wave antenna would disprove the method's validity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17571 by Anthony Grbic, David Gonz\'alez-Ovejero, John N. Le, Mauro Ettorre, Oscar Senlis, Vincent Laquerbe.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A perspective view of the unit-cell of a LWA. Boundary conditions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Flow chart of the iterative method used to compute the complex wave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) One-dimensional periodic unit-cell of the slotted parallel plate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) One-dimensional periodic unit-cell of the metal strip grating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Real power at port 1 of the metal strip grating unit-cell as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison between the real and imaginary parts of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison between the real and imaginary parts of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper introduces two methods for analyzing periodic leaky-wave antennas (LWAs) within a new framework denoted as multi-modal network theory (MNT) with open periodic boundaries (OPBs). The approach is hybrid, combining analytical techniques with a commercial full-wave solver. The first method computes the dispersion diagram of periodic LWAs. It is iterative and relies on the full-wave simulation of a single unit-cell of a LWA, coupled with the analytical solution of an eigenvalue problem. This method effectively captures both the phase and attenuation constants of periodic LWAs while using fewer modes than previous methods with commercial frequency-domain solvers. The method is validated by computing the dispersion of classic LWA unit-cells and comparing them to those obtained through full-wave simulations of the full-length antenna and other state-of-the-art methods. The second, also based on OPB-MNT, focuses on LWA analysis in reception. Specifically, it determines the response of a unit-cell to an incident plane wave. To validate this method, we compute the response of LWA with different unit-cell designs. By comparing these results with the corresponding dispersion analysis, we show that the receiving case and the eigenvalue problem are related but not simply time-reversed versions of each other.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces multi-modal network theory with open periodic boundaries (MNT-OPB) as a hybrid framework for analyzing periodic leaky-wave antennas. It details an iterative method that combines commercial full-wave simulation of a single unit cell with an analytical eigenvalue problem to determine the dispersion characteristics, including both phase and attenuation constants. A second method is presented for computing the response of the unit cell to an incident plane wave in the receiving mode. Validation is performed by comparing results to full-length finite-array simulations and existing methods, asserting that the approach requires fewer modes than prior techniques while accurately modeling the infinite periodic structure.

Significance. Should the validations hold, this work provides a more efficient computational strategy for LWA analysis by reducing the modal expansion requirements and avoiding the need for full-structure simulations. The insight that transmission and reception are related but not time-reversed adds to the understanding of LWA physics and could aid in the design of antennas with specific radiation and reception properties.

major comments (2)
  1. [Dispersion computation method] The iterative solution of the eigenvalue problem is central to the dispersion method; however, the manuscript should specify the convergence criteria and the sensitivity to the number of modes retained to substantiate the claim of using fewer modes than previous methods with commercial solvers.
  2. [Validation section] The comparison to full-length simulations is load-bearing for the claim that the OPB unit-cell accurately represents the infinite structure; quantitative error metrics (e.g., percentage difference in attenuation constant) should be provided for the classic LWA geometries tested.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'other state-of-the-art methods' without naming them; a brief mention in the introduction would improve context.
  2. [Reception method] Clarify the notation used for the incident plane wave response to avoid ambiguity with the dispersion parameters.
  3. [Figures] Ensure all figures have consistent scaling and labels for easy comparison between methods.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and the recommendation for minor revision. The comments identify key areas where additional detail will improve the manuscript's clarity and rigor. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested information in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The iterative solution of the eigenvalue problem is central to the dispersion method; however, the manuscript should specify the convergence criteria and the sensitivity to the number of modes retained to substantiate the claim of using fewer modes than previous methods with commercial solvers.

    Authors: We agree that explicit convergence criteria and a mode-sensitivity study are necessary to support the efficiency claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (or short subsection) under the dispersion method that states the iterative stopping criterion (relative change in the complex propagation constant below a fixed tolerance) and presents results showing how the phase and attenuation constants stabilize as the number of retained modes is increased. We will also include a brief comparison of the mode count required for convergence against representative prior commercial-solver implementations to substantiate the statement that fewer modes are needed. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The comparison to full-length simulations is load-bearing for the claim that the OPB unit-cell accurately represents the infinite structure; quantitative error metrics (e.g., percentage difference in attenuation constant) should be provided for the classic LWA geometries tested.

    Authors: We concur that quantitative error metrics are essential for a convincing validation. The revised validation section will be augmented with a table (or inline values) reporting the percentage differences in both phase and attenuation constants between the MNT-OPB results and the corresponding full-length finite-array simulations for each classic LWA geometry examined. These metrics will be placed alongside the existing dispersion diagrams so that readers can directly assess the fidelity of the unit-cell model. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's hybrid OPB-MNT framework computes dispersion via unit-cell full-wave simulation coupled to an analytical eigenvalue problem, then validates both dispersion and reception results against independent full-length finite-array simulations and prior state-of-the-art methods. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the eigenvalue solve and plane-wave response are distinct from the validation data, and the weakest assumption (faithful representation of the infinite structure) is directly tested rather than presupposed.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on standard electromagnetic modeling of periodic structures and the validity of open periodic boundaries; no explicit free parameters or additional invented entities beyond the named framework are described.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard electromagnetic boundary conditions and modal expansion for periodic structures hold when open periodic boundaries are applied to a single unit cell.
    Invoked implicitly to justify that unit-cell simulation represents the infinite array.
invented entities (1)
  • Multi-modal network theory with open periodic boundaries (MNT-OPB) no independent evidence
    purpose: Hybrid framework combining analytical eigenvalue solution with full-wave unit-cell simulation for LWA analysis
    New framework introduced and denoted in the paper; no independent evidence outside this work is provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5539 in / 1394 out tokens · 76966 ms · 2026-05-10T05:30:37.851183+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Existence of a photonic gap in periodic dielectric structures,

    K. M. Ho, C. T. Chan, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Existence of a photonic gap in periodic dielectric structures,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 65, pp. 3152–3155, Dec 1990

  2. [2]

    Hexagonal photonic-band-gap structures,

    D. Cassagne, C. Jouanin, and D. Bertho, “Hexagonal photonic-band-gap structures,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 53, pp. 7134–7142, Mar 1996

  3. [3]

    Creation of partial band gaps in anisotropic photonic-band-gap structures,

    Z.-Y . Li, J. Wang, and B.-Y . Gu, “Creation of partial band gaps in anisotropic photonic-band-gap structures,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 58, pp. 3721–3729, Aug 1998

  4. [4]

    Equivalent network of a multimode planar grating,

    I. Palocz and A. Oliner, “Equivalent network of a multimode planar grating,”IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 244–252, 1970

  5. [5]

    Unlocking complexity using the ECA: The equivalent circuit model as an efficient and physically insightful tool for microwave engineering,

    F. Mesa, R. Rodriguez-Berral, and F. Medina, “Unlocking complexity using the ECA: The equivalent circuit model as an efficient and physically insightful tool for microwave engineering,”IEEE Microw. Mag., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 44–65, 2018

  6. [6]

    Dispersion extraction with near-field measurements in periodic waveguides,

    A. A. Sukhorukov, S. Ha, I. V . Shadrivov, D. A. Powell, and Y . S. Kivshar, “Dispersion extraction with near-field measurements in periodic waveguides,”Opt. Express, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 3716–3721, Mar 2009

  7. [7]

    A simple technique for the dispersion analysis of Fabry-Perot cavity leaky-wave antennas,

    C. Mateo-Segura, M. Garcia-Vigueras, G. Goussetis, A. P. Feresidis, and J. L. Gomez-Tornero, “A simple technique for the dispersion analysis of Fabry-Perot cavity leaky-wave antennas,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 803–810, 2012

  8. [8]

    Accurate analysis of periodic structures with an additional symmetry in the unit cell from classical matrix eigenvalues,

    S. Amari, R. Vahldieck, and J. Bornemann, “Accurate analysis of periodic structures with an additional symmetry in the unit cell from classical matrix eigenvalues,”IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1513–1515, 1998

  9. [9]

    Experimental validation of frozen modes guided on printed coupled transmission lines,

    N. Apaydin, L. Zhang, K. Sertel, and J. L. V olakis, “Experimental validation of frozen modes guided on printed coupled transmission lines,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1513–1519, 2012

  10. [10]

    Analysis of single-cell modeling of periodic metamaterial structures,

    B. Bandlow, R. Schuhmann, G. Lubkowski, and T. Weiland, “Analysis of single-cell modeling of periodic metamaterial structures,”IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1662–1665, 2008

  11. [11]

    Enhanced periodic structure analysis based on a multiconductor transmission line model and application to metamaterials,

    F. Bongard, J. Perruisseau-Carrier, and J. R. Mosig, “Enhanced periodic structure analysis based on a multiconductor transmission line model and application to metamaterials,”IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 2715–2726, 2009

  12. [12]

    Evaluation of metal and surface roughness losses in 1-D periodic structures using the multimodal transfer matrix approach,

    F. Giusti, F. Mesa, E. Martini, and O. Quevedo-Teruel, “Evaluation of metal and surface roughness losses in 1-D periodic structures using the multimodal transfer matrix approach,” inInt. Symp. Antennas Propag. (ISAP), 2024, pp. 1–2

  13. [13]

    Bloch analysis of artificial lines and surfaces exhibiting glide symmetry,

    M. Bagheriasl, O. Quevedo-Teruel, and G. Valerio, “Bloch analysis of artificial lines and surfaces exhibiting glide symmetry,”IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 2618–2628, 2019

  14. [14]

    Anisotropic glide-symmetric substrate-integrated-holey metasurface for a compressed ultrawideband Luneburg lens,

    Q. Chen, F. Giusti, G. Valerio, F. Mesa, and O. Quevedo-Teruel, “Anisotropic glide-symmetric substrate-integrated-holey metasurface for a compressed ultrawideband Luneburg lens,”Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 118, no. 8, p. 084102, 02 2021

  15. [15]

    Efficient bloch analysis of general periodic structures with a linearized multimodal transfer-matrix approach,

    F. Giusti, Q. Chen, F. Mesa, M. Albani, and O. Quevedo-Teruel, “Efficient bloch analysis of general periodic structures with a linearized multimodal transfer-matrix approach,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 5555–5562, 2022. 9

  16. [16]

    Multimodal transfer matrix method applied to 3-D periodic structures,

    F. Giusti, F. Mesa, Q. Chen, G. Valerio, and O. Quevedo-Teruel, “Multimodal transfer matrix method applied to 3-D periodic structures,” inInt. Symp. Antennas Propag. (ISAP), 2021, pp. 1–2

  17. [17]

    Multimodal transfer matrix method to calculate the dispersion diagram of open structures,

    S. Garcia-Martinez, F. Giusti, F. Mesa, A. Tamayo-Dominguez, P. Sanchez-Olivares, and O. Quevedo-Teruel, “Multimodal transfer matrix method to calculate the dispersion diagram of open structures,” in19th Eur . Conf. Antennas Propag. (EuCAP), 2025, pp. 1–5

  18. [18]

    F. Mesa, G. Valerio, R. Rodríguez-Berral, and O. Quevedo-Teruel, “Simulation-assisted efficient computation of the dispersion diagram of periodic structures: A comprehensive overview with applications to filters, leaky-wave antennas and metasurfaces,”IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 33–45, 2021

  19. [19]

    Linearized multimodal transfer-matrix approach applied to 2-D periodic leaky-wave antennas,

    F. Giusti, Q. Chen, F. Mesa, M. Albani, and O. Quevedo-Teruel, “Linearized multimodal transfer-matrix approach applied to 2-D periodic leaky-wave antennas,” in17th Eur . Conf. Antennas Propag. (EuCAP), 2023, pp. 1–4

  20. [20]

    Analysis and synthesis of cascaded meta- surfaces using wave matrices,

    A. Ranjbar and A. Grbic, “Analysis and synthesis of cascaded meta- surfaces using wave matrices,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 95, p. 205114, May 2017

  21. [21]

    Metastructures consisting of cascaded high-contrast subwavelength gratings,

    S. Young, L. Szymanski, and A. Grbic, “Metastructures consisting of cascaded high-contrast subwavelength gratings,” inHigh Contrast Metastructures IX, C. J. Chang-Hasnain, A. Faraon, and W. Zhou, Eds., vol. 11290, International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE, 2020, p. 112900Z

  22. [22]

    Modal network formulation for the analysis and design of mode-converting metasurfaces in cylindrical waveguides,

    F. Alsolamy and A. Grbic, “Modal network formulation for the analysis and design of mode-converting metasurfaces in cylindrical waveguides,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 4598–4611, 2021

  23. [23]

    Simulating space-time structures using commercial solvers,

    C. Scarborough, Q. Chen, Z. Wu, and A. Grbic, “Simulating space-time structures using commercial solvers,” inUSNC-URSI National Radio Science Meeting (APS-URSI), Denver, CO, USA, Jul. 10-15, 2022

  24. [24]

    COMSOL Multiphysics ® v. 5.6. www.comsol.com. COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden, 2020

  25. [25]

    D. M. Pozar,Microwave Engineering, 4th ed. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, nov 2011

  26. [26]

    Full-wave analysis of periodic dielectric frequency-selective surfaces under plane wave excitation,

    Á. Coves, S. Marini, B. Gimeno, and V . Boria, “Full-wave analysis of periodic dielectric frequency-selective surfaces under plane wave excitation,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 2760– 2769, 2012

  27. [27]

    A simple algorithm for accurate location of leaky-wave poles for grounded inhomogeneous dielectric slabs,

    V . Galdi and I. M. Pinto, “A simple algorithm for accurate location of leaky-wave poles for grounded inhomogeneous dielectric slabs,”Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 135–140, 2000

  28. [28]

    A comparison of some numerical techniques for analyzing leaky-wave antennas using full-wave solvers,

    P. Deb, D. Jackson, F. Mesa, G. Valerio, and O. Quevedo-Teruel, “A comparison of some numerical techniques for analyzing leaky-wave antennas using full-wave solvers,” inUSNC-URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Boulder, CO, USA, Jan. 6-9, 2026

  29. [29]

    Radially periodic leaky-wave antenna for Bessel beam generation over a wide-frequency range,

    D. Comite, W. Fuscaldo, S. K. Podilchak, P. D. H. Re, V . G.-G. Buendia, P. Burghignoli, P. Baccarelli, and A. Galli, “Radially periodic leaky-wave antenna for Bessel beam generation over a wide-frequency range,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 2828–2843, 2018

  30. [30]

    A flush-mounted leaky-wave antenna with predictable patterns,

    R. Honey, “A flush-mounted leaky-wave antenna with predictable patterns,”IRE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 320–329, 1959

  31. [31]

    Broadside radiation from periodic leaky- wave antennas,

    M. Guglielmi and D. Jackson, “Broadside radiation from periodic leaky- wave antennas,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 1993

  32. [32]

    Generation of propagating Bessel beams using leaky-wave modes,

    M. Ettorre and A. Grbic, “Generation of propagating Bessel beams using leaky-wave modes,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 3605–3613, 2012

  33. [33]

    Bessel-Gauss beams through leaky waves: Focusing and diffractive properties,

    W. Fuscaldo, A. Benedetti, D. Comite, P. Baccarelli, P. Burghignoli, and A. Galli, “Bessel-Gauss beams through leaky waves: Focusing and diffractive properties,”Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 13, p. 064040, Jun 2020

  34. [34]

    Design and experimental validation of an E-Band wideband Bessel-beam launcher on quartz,

    E. Negri, J. Taillieu, W. Fuscaldo, M. Robin, X. Morvan, O. De Sagazan, P. Burghignoli, A. Galli, and D. González-Ovejero, “Design and experimental validation of an E-Band wideband Bessel-beam launcher on quartz,”IEEE J. Microw., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1329–1338, 2025

  35. [35]

    Averaged transition conditions for electromagnetic fields at a metafilm,

    E. Kuester, M. Mohamed, M. Piket-May, and C. Holloway, “Averaged transition conditions for electromagnetic fields at a metafilm,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 2641–2651, 2003

  36. [36]

    A printed leaky-wave antenna based on a sinusoidally-modulated reactance surface,

    A. M. Patel and A. Grbic, “A printed leaky-wave antenna based on a sinusoidally-modulated reactance surface,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 2087–2096, 2011

  37. [37]

    An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces: The two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials,

    C. L. Holloway, E. F. Kuester, J. A. Gordon, J. O’Hara, J. Booth, and D. R. Smith, “An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces: The two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials,”IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 10–35, 2012

  38. [38]

    Modeling and analysis of printed-circuit tensor impedance surfaces,

    A. M. Patel and A. Grbic, “Modeling and analysis of printed-circuit tensor impedance surfaces,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 211–220, 2013

  39. [39]

    Gaussian ring basis functions for the analysis of modulated metasurface antennas,

    D. González-Ovejero and S. Maci, “Gaussian ring basis functions for the analysis of modulated metasurface antennas,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 3982–3993, 2015

  40. [40]

    A closed-form representation of isofrequency dispersion curve and group velocity for surface waves supported by anisotropic and spatially dispersive metasurfaces,

    M. Mencagli, C. D. Giovampaola, and S. Maci, “A closed-form representation of isofrequency dispersion curve and group velocity for surface waves supported by anisotropic and spatially dispersive metasurfaces,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2319– 2327, 2016

  41. [41]

    Electromagnetic scattering by arbitrarily shaped surfaces with impedance boundary conditions,

    A. W. Glisson, “Electromagnetic scattering by arbitrarily shaped surfaces with impedance boundary conditions,”Radio Sci., vol. 27, no. 06, pp. 935–943, 1992

  42. [42]

    Surface-integral equations for electromagnetic scattering from impenetrable and penetrable sheets,

    E. Bleszynski, M. Bleszynski, and T. Jaroszewicz, “Surface-integral equations for electromagnetic scattering from impenetrable and penetrable sheets,”IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 14–25, 1993

  43. [43]

    On the numerical simulation of metasurfaces with impedance boundary condition integral equations,

    M. A. Francavilla, E. Martini, S. Maci, and G. Vecchi, “On the numerical simulation of metasurfaces with impedance boundary condition integral equations,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 2153–2161, 2015

  44. [44]

    Guided waves on sinusoidally-modulated reactance surfaces,

    A. Oliner and A. Hessel, “Guided waves on sinusoidally-modulated reactance surfaces,”IRE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 201–208, 1959

  45. [45]

    New wine in old barrels: The use of the Oliner’s method in metasurface antenna design,

    F. Caminita and S. Maci, “New wine in old barrels: The use of the Oliner’s method in metasurface antenna design,” in44th Eur . Microw. Conf., 2014, pp. 437–439

  46. [46]

    Controlling electromagnetic surface waves with scalar and tensor impedance surfaces,

    A. M. Patel, “Controlling electromagnetic surface waves with scalar and tensor impedance surfaces,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, 2013

  47. [47]

    ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., 2023

    HFSS, Ansys ® Electromagnetics Suite, Release 2023 R2. ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., 2023