arxiv: 2604.17929 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 📡 eess.SP

Recognition: unknown

Ray Tracing-Enabled Digital Twin for RIS Phase Optimization: Implementation and Experimental Validation

\"Omer L\"utf\"u Karakelle , Sefa Kayrakl{\i}k , \.Ibrahim H\"okelek , Ali G\"or\c{c}in , Halim Yan{\i}k\"omero\u{g}lu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP

keywords reconfigurable intelligent surfacedigital twinray tracingphase shift optimizationwireless propagationexperimental validationsignal power

0 comments

The pith

A ray-tracing digital twin optimizes RIS phase shifts from location data alone and delivers measurable gains when applied to physical hardware.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes using a digital twin of the wireless environment, built via ray-tracing on a 3D map, to determine the best phase settings for each element of a reconfigurable intelligent surface. The approach avoids the usual heavy pilot signaling needed to estimate the full channel to the surface. Instead, it uses known positions of the transmitter and receiver to run simulations inside the twin and pick phases that focus the signal. These phases are sent to a real prototype, where tests confirm they increase the received power. The result shows that simulation can replace much of the measurement burden for controlling such surfaces in practice.

Core claim

The central claim is that phase configurations computed inside a ray-tracing digital twin, using only transceiver locations and a three-dimensional environmental map, produce higher received signal power when transferred to a physical RIS than would be obtained without optimization, confirming that the model captures the essential propagation effects accurately enough for control purposes.

What carries the argument

The digital twin constructed from the 3D map using ray-tracing simulation, which models propagation paths to compute optimal RIS phase shifts based on device positions.

If this is right

The method removes the need for high-dimensional channel estimation in RIS systems.
Phase optimization can occur with low latency using location information.
Physical RIS deployments become feasible in dynamic settings without constant signaling overhead.
Validation experiments link simulated performance directly to measured gains in the real environment.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the 3D map is maintained over time, the same twin could track and adapt to slow environmental changes.
Similar ray-tracing twins might optimize other controllable surfaces or reflectors without dedicated pilots.
Integration with positioning systems could make RIS control largely passive from the communication perspective.

Load-bearing premise

The ray-tracing simulation based on the 3D map must accurately model the real-world reflections, diffractions, and material interactions so that the computed phases remain effective on the physical device.

What would settle it

Observing no increase in received signal power when the DT-computed phases are applied to the physical RIS compared to a default or random configuration would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17929 by Ali G\"or\c{c}in, Halim Yan{\i}k\"omero\u{g}lu, \.Ibrahim H\"okelek, \"Omer L\"utf\"u Karakelle, Sefa Kayrakl{\i}k.

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: 3D Model of the environment viewed in Sionna. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Flowchart of the experimental methodology. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Experimental setup. forming strategies on the extracted channel data without rerunning the ray-tracing simulation. III. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION In this section, we present the experimental setup to validate the proposed DT-driven optimization framework and discuss the measurement results from a real-world indoor scenario. A. Experimental Environment and Hardware Setup The measurement… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: RIS phase configurations for different UE locations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Comparison of RSRP gains achieved by Physical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Determining the optimal phase configurations of reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) elements typically requires complex channel estimation procedures with high pilot overhead, creating a bottleneck for real-time deployment in time-varying wireless environments. In this paper, we propose a digital twin (DT)-driven framework for RIS phase shift optimization that eliminates extensive signaling overhead associated with estimating high-dimensional RIS channels. Leveraging the NVIDIA Sionna ray-tracing library, we construct a DT of the physical environment based on a three-dimensional map. The proposed system utilizes the location information of the transceivers to compute the optimal RIS phase shift configurations within the DT. These computationally generated configurations are then transferred to a physical RIS prototype. Experimental results demonstrate that the phase configurations obtained from the DT significantly enhance the received signal power in the physical environment, validating the fidelity of the ray-tracing model and the feasibility of the proposed optimization strategy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gets a working DT-to-hardware pipeline for RIS phases from location data alone, but skips the direct sim-vs-measured power check that would confirm model fidelity.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that a Sionna-based digital twin built from a 3D map can generate RIS phase vectors that, when loaded onto a physical prototype, produce a clear increase in received power. This sidesteps the usual high-overhead channel estimation step and shows the idea can move from simulation to bench without pilots in the loop. That end-to-end transfer is the concrete piece that stands out from earlier simulation-only or estimation-heavy RIS papers. The implementation details on how they map transceiver locations into the twin and extract the phases look reproducible enough to be useful for someone trying to replicate the setup. The experimental outcome supports feasibility in their indoor test environment. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress-test flagged: they report the power gain after applying the DT phases but do not show the DT-predicted power for those same phases or the numerical discrepancy with the measured value. Without that comparison it is difficult to judge how accurately the ray-tracing model captures reflections, materials, and diffraction versus simply finding a configuration that happens to help. The central assumption that the 3D map plus material properties are sufficient therefore rests on indirect evidence. Minor gaps like missing baseline comparisons or variability across multiple locations are secondary but would also help. This is the kind of paper that matters for groups building 6G indoor prototypes or RIS testbeds who already have access to ray-tracing tools and want to reduce signaling. It is not a theoretical advance, but the hardware validation makes it worth a referee's time. I would send it to review with a request for the missing sim-to-real power numbers and a short sensitivity check on the map assumptions.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a digital twin (DT) framework for RIS phase optimization that uses NVIDIA Sionna ray-tracing on a 3D map of the environment to compute optimal phase shifts from transceiver locations, thereby avoiding high-overhead channel estimation. These simulated phases are transferred to a physical RIS prototype, and experiments are reported to show increased received signal power, which the authors interpret as validation of the ray-tracing model's fidelity and the overall strategy.

Significance. If the simulation-to-reality transfer holds with quantifiable accuracy, the approach could substantially lower pilot overhead for RIS configuration in dynamic wireless settings, supporting more scalable deployment in 6G systems. The use of an open-source ray-tracing library and a hardware prototype provides a concrete path from geometric modeling to physical implementation.

major comments (3)

[Experimental results] Experimental results section: the manuscript states that DT-derived phases 'significantly enhance' measured received power but does not report the DT-simulated received power value for the identical phase vector, nor any quantitative discrepancy (e.g., dB error or correlation) between the ray-tracing prediction and the physical measurement. This direct comparison is required to substantiate the central claim that the Sionna DT accurately represents the propagation environment.
[System model / Experimental validation] Optimization and validation procedure: the claim that the DT produces phases that remain effective when applied physically rests on the untested assumption that the 3D map captures all relevant reflections, diffractions, and material properties; no sensitivity analysis or ablation on map fidelity (e.g., varying material coefficients or omitting diffraction) is provided to bound the risk that unmodeled effects dominate the observed gain.
[Experimental results] Baseline comparisons: no quantitative results are given against reference configurations (random phases, location-based geometric phases without full ray-tracing, or conventional channel-estimation methods), so the incremental benefit attributable to the DT cannot be isolated from generic RIS gains.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract would benefit from reporting the observed power gain in dB together with the number of trials or environmental conditions to allow immediate assessment of effect size.
[Figures] Figure captions and legends should explicitly state whether plotted power values are simulated, measured, or both, and include error bars or variability measures where applicable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be incorporated to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Experimental results] Experimental results section: the manuscript states that DT-derived phases 'significantly enhance' measured received power but does not report the DT-simulated received power value for the identical phase vector, nor any quantitative discrepancy (e.g., dB error or correlation) between the ray-tracing prediction and the physical measurement. This direct comparison is required to substantiate the central claim that the Sionna DT accurately represents the propagation environment.

Authors: We agree that directly comparing the DT-simulated received power for the optimized phase vector against the physical measurements, along with quantitative discrepancy metrics, is necessary to substantiate the model's fidelity. In the revised manuscript, we will add the simulated received power values obtained from Sionna for the DT-derived phases and report the dB error and correlation between simulation and experiment. revision: yes
Referee: [System model / Experimental validation] Optimization and validation procedure: the claim that the DT produces phases that remain effective when applied physically rests on the untested assumption that the 3D map captures all relevant reflections, diffractions, and material properties; no sensitivity analysis or ablation on map fidelity (e.g., varying material coefficients or omitting diffraction) is provided to bound the risk that unmodeled effects dominate the observed gain.

Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the approach assumes sufficient fidelity in the 3D map. While the physical experiments show that the transferred phases yield measurable power gains, this provides only indirect evidence of map adequacy. We will revise the manuscript to include a detailed account of the map construction process, data sources for geometry and materials, and a discussion of potential unmodeled effects. A full sensitivity/ablation study is beyond the scope of the current work but will be noted as future research; we will add initial analysis by varying key parameters such as material coefficients where feasible. revision: partial
Referee: [Experimental results] Baseline comparisons: no quantitative results are given against reference configurations (random phases, location-based geometric phases without full ray-tracing, or conventional channel-estimation methods), so the incremental benefit attributable to the DT cannot be isolated from generic RIS gains.

Authors: We acknowledge the need for baselines to isolate the DT contribution. In the revised experimental results section, we will add quantitative comparisons against random phase configurations and location-based geometric phases (without full ray-tracing). These will demonstrate the incremental benefit of the ray-tracing DT. A direct experimental comparison to conventional channel-estimation-based optimization is not feasible within the current prototype setup but will be discussed as a direction for future work. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper constructs a digital twin from a 3D map using the Sionna ray-tracing library, computes optimal RIS phase configurations from transceiver locations inside the simulation, transfers the resulting phase vector to a physical prototype, and reports measured power improvement in the real environment. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations reduce the claimed enhancement to a quantity defined from the same data by construction; the simulation step is independent of the physical measurements, and the validation rests on external experimental observation rather than any renaming or self-referential loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the ray-tracing DT faithfully reproduces real-world propagation; this is treated as a domain assumption rather than derived from first principles.

axioms (1)

domain assumption A three-dimensional map of the environment is available and sufficiently accurate for ray-tracing simulation of wireless propagation.
The DT is constructed from this map to compute phases without channel estimation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5490 in / 1211 out tokens · 49378 ms · 2026-05-10T04:46:21.108799+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Fidelity Where it Matters: Site-Specific Nonuniform Refinement for Wireless Digital Twins
eess.SP 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

An ellipsoid-guided selective refinement algorithm improves radio-map fidelity in urban wireless digital twins by prioritizing refinement of a small subset of buildings using only low-fidelity models.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Reconﬁgurable intelligent surfaces: Potentials, applica- tions, and challenges for 6G wireless networks,

S. Basharat, S. A. Hassan, H. Pervaiz, A. Mahmood, Z. Ding, and M. Gidlund, “Reconﬁgurable intelligent surfaces: Potentials, applica- tions, and challenges for 6G wireless networks,” IEEE Wireless Com- munications, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 184–191, 2021

2021
[2]

Channel estimation and beamforming design for MF-RIS-aided communication systems,

Z. Pan, W. Wang, G. Nie, A. Zheng, and W. Ni, “Channel estimation and beamforming design for MF-RIS-aided communication systems,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters , vol. 32, pp. 916–920, 2025

2025
[3]

A survey on channel estima- tion and practical passive beamforming design for intelligent reﬂecting surface aided wireless communications,

B. Zheng, C. Y ou, W. Mei, and R. Zhang, “A survey on channel estima- tion and practical passive beamforming design for intelligent reﬂecting surface aided wireless communications,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1035–1071, 2022

2022
[4]

Intelligent reﬂecting surface meets OFDM: Protocol design and rate maximization,

Y . Y ang, B. Zheng, S. Zhang, and R. Zhang, “Intelligent reﬂecting surface meets OFDM: Protocol design and rate maximization,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 4522–4535, 2020

2020
[5]

Channel estimation and low-complexity beamforming design for passive intelligent surface assisted MISO wireless energy transfer,

D. Mishra and H. Johansson, “Channel estimation and low-complexity beamforming design for passive intelligent surface assisted MISO wireless energy transfer,” in ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , 2019, pp. 4659–4663

2019
[6]

A survey on model- based, heuristic, and machine learning optimization approaches in RIS- aided wireless networks,

H. Zhou, M. Erol-Kantarci, Y . Liu, and H. V . Poor, “A survey on model- based, heuristic, and machine learning optimization approaches in RIS- aided wireless networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 781–823, 2024

2024
[7]

Intelligent surfaces empowered wireless network: Recent advances and the road to 6G,

Q. Wu, B. Zheng, C. Y ou, L. Zhu, K. Shen, X. Shao, W. Mei, B. Di, H. Zhang, E. Basar, L. Song, M. Di Renzo, Z.-Q. Luo, and R. Zhang, “Intelligent surfaces empowered wireless network: Recent advances and the road to 6G,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 724–763, 2024

2024
[8]

Sparsity-aware channel estimation for fully passive RIS-based wireless communications: Theory to experiments,

M. M. Amri, N. M. Tran, J. H. Park, D. I. Kim, and K. W. Choi, “Sparsity-aware channel estimation for fully passive RIS-based wireless communications: Theory to experiments,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 8046–8067, 2023

2023
[9]

Location- aware communication for RIS-aided distributed MIMO systems,

Z. Y ang, H. Zhang, B. Di, X. Li, X. Hou, and L. Song, “Location- aware communication for RIS-aided distributed MIMO systems,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology , vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 4445–4460, 2025

2025
[10]

Performance optimization for environment-aware STAR-RIS assisted terahertz multi-user ultra- massive MIMO systems based on microwave coincidence imaging,

X. Wang, Z. Lin, F. Lin, and P . Xiao, “Performance optimization for environment-aware STAR-RIS assisted terahertz multi-user ultra- massive MIMO systems based on microwave coincidence imaging,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology, vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 12 274– 12 289, 2025

2025
[11]

Real-time digital twins: Vision and research directions for 6G and beyond,

A. Alkhateeb, S. Jiang, and G. Charan, “Real-time digital twins: Vision and research directions for 6G and beyond,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 128–134, 2023

2023
[12]

Hoydis, S

J. Hoydis, S. Cammerer, F. Ait Aoudia, M. Nimier-David, L. Maggi, G. Marcus, A. V em, and A. Keller, “Sionna,” 2022, https://nvlabs.github.io/sionna/

2022
[13]

Toward digital network twins: Integrating sionna RT in ns-3 for 6G multi-rat networks simulations,

R. Pegurri, F. Linsalata, E. Moro, J. Hoydis, and U. Spagnolini, “Toward digital network twins: Integrating sionna RT in ns-3 for 6G multi-rat networks simulations,” in IEEE INFOCOM 2025 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) , 2025, pp. 1–6

2025
[14]

Open wireless digital twin: End-to-end 5G mobility emulation with OpenAirInterface and ray tracing,

T. Iye, M. Sakamoto, S. Takaya, E. Sato, Y . Susukida, Y . Nagaoka, K. Maruta, and J. Nakazato, “Open wireless digital twin: End-to-end 5G mobility emulation with OpenAirInterface and ray tracing,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 175 109–175 122, 2025

2025
[15]

Real-time localization of objects using radio frequency propagation in digital twin,

S. Amatare, G. Singh, A. Kharel, and D. Roy, “Real-time localization of objects using radio frequency propagation in digital twin,” in MILCOM 2024 - 2024 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM) , 2024, pp. 653–654

2024
[16]

RIS optimization algorithms for urban wireless scenarios in sionna RT,

A. E. Güne¸ ser, B. ¸ Sekero˘glu, S. Kayraklık, E. Karakoca, ˙I. Hökelek, S. Aldirmaz-Colak, and A. Görçin, “RIS optimization algorithms for urban wireless scenarios in sionna RT,” in 2025 IEEE 101st V ehicular Technology Conference (VTC2025-Spring) , 2025, pp. 1–6

2025
[17]

Digital twin aided RIS communication: Robust beamforming and interference management,

S. Alikhani and A. Alkhateeb, “Digital twin aided RIS communication: Robust beamforming and interference management,” in 2024 IEEE 100th V ehicular Technology Conference (VTC2024-Fall), 2024, pp. 1–6

2024
[18]

N78 frequency band modular RIS design and implementation,

S. Kayraklık, R. Ba¸ s, H. O. Çalı¸ skan, S. ¸ Sahino˘glu, S. Erdo ˘gan, ˙I. Ünal, ˙I. Hökelek, K. Nurdan, and A. Görçin, “N78 frequency band modular RIS design and implementation,” in 2025 55th European Microwave Conference (EuMC) , 2025, pp. 795–798

2025
[19]

Openairinterface: Democratizing innovation in the 5G era,

F. Kaltenberger, A. P . Silva, A. Gosain, L. Wang, and T.-T. Nguyen, “Openairinterface: Democratizing innovation in the 5G era,” Computer Networks, vol. 176, p. 107284, 2020

2020
[20]

Indoor measurements for RIS-aided communication: Practical phase shift optimization, coverage enhancement, and physical layer security,

S. Kayraklik, I. Yildirim, I. Hokelek, Y . Gevez, E. Basar, and A. Gorcin, “Indoor measurements for RIS-aided communication: Practical phase shift optimization, coverage enhancement, and physical layer security,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , vol. 5, pp. 1243– 1255, 2024

2024