pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.18138 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 📡 eess.SP

Semi-Blind Receivers for RIS-Aided Fluid Antenna Systems

Josu\'e V. de Ara\'ujo , Gilderlan T. de Ara\'ujo , Andr\'e L. F. de Almeida This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords semi-blind estimationreconfigurable intelligent surfacesfluid antennastensor decompositionPARAFACchannel estimationwireless communicationsRIS-aided systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Semi-blind tensor receivers jointly estimate channels and symbols in RIS-aided fluid antenna systems using far less training than pilot-based methods.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces a semi-blind framework that recovers both the cascaded channels and the transmitted symbols at once in systems that pair reconfigurable intelligent surfaces with fluid antennas. Two hierarchical protocols structure the received signals into PARAFAC or nested PARAFAC2 tensors, which alternating-least-squares decompositions can factor without needing full pilot sequences. The resulting receivers exploit the extra degrees of freedom created by antenna-port and surface reconfigurations to lower training overhead while preserving estimation accuracy. A reader would care because channel acquisition remains one of the largest practical barriers to deploying these reconfigurable technologies at scale.

Core claim

The paper claims that the two hierarchical protocols produce distinct tensor models (PARAFAC for the two-time-scale case and Nested PARAFAC2 for the single-time-scale case) whose trilinear structure permits semi-blind receivers based on alternating least squares to jointly recover the user-to-RIS channels, RIS-to-BS channels, and data symbols by exploiting spatio-temporal diversity, with explicit identifiability conditions and complexity expressions that expose a robustness-versus-complexity trade-off between the two protocols.

What carries the argument

The PARAFAC tensor model (Protocol 1) and Nested PARAFAC2 tensor model (Protocol 2) created by the hierarchical transmission protocols, which enable trilinear alternating least squares to separate the unknown channels from the symbols.

If this is right

  • The PF receiver (Protocol 1) achieves stronger robustness by more fully exploiting simultaneous RIS and fluid-antenna reconfiguration.
  • The NPF receiver (Protocol 2) supplies a lower-complexity, more flexible alternative when computational resources are limited.
  • Both receivers demonstrably reduce the required training overhead while delivering accurate channel and symbol estimates in simulations.
  • The derived identifiability conditions quantify the minimum reconfiguration diversity needed for unique recovery under each protocol.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the tensor structures remain approximately valid under hardware imperfections, similar hierarchical protocols could be applied to other reconfigurable antenna architectures to cut pilot overhead.
  • The approach suggests that tensor decompositions may replace many purely pilot-based channel estimators in future systems that already employ controllable surfaces or movable antennas.
  • Combining the semi-blind receivers with iterative refinement or learned initialization could further reduce sensitivity to the exact identifiability thresholds.

Load-bearing premise

The cascaded channels and transmitted symbols must exactly obey the PARAFAC or Nested PARAFAC2 structures induced by the protocols, and the derived identifiability conditions must hold under realistic propagation conditions.

What would settle it

In a hardware experiment or measured-channel simulation, the symbol error rate after semi-blind recovery remains high even when the number of training blocks matches the identifiability bound and the reconfigurations follow the protocol exactly.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18138 by Andr\'e L. F. de Almeida, Gilderlan T. de Ara\'ujo, Josu\'e V. de Ara\'ujo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: System model and transmission structure: (a) fluid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Performance comparison of the proposed semi-blind receivers versus SNR: (a) BER for Protocols 1 and 2 with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: BER sensitivity to user load and spatial-temporal resource allocation under fixed total overhead: (a) Protocol 2 for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: NMSE sensitivity to user load and spatial-temporal resource allocation, including the pilot-assisted reference: (a) Protocol [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: SE versus SNR for different RIS/FA optimization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: SE comparison between Protocols 1 and 2 under FPA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs) and fluid antennas (FAs) are key technologies for enhancing spatial degrees of freedom in future wireless networks. However, channel acquisition in RIS-aided FA systems is challenging as cascaded links depend on time-varying antenna-port selections and RIS configurations, leading to high training overhead in conventional pilot-based methods. We propose a semi-blind estimation framework for this joint architecture to estimate channels and symbols concurrently. Two hierarchical transmission protocols are introduced, resulting in distinct tensor models. Protocol 1 uses a two-time-scale structure yielding a PARAFAC (PF) model, while Protocol 2 employs a single-time-scale structure with blockwise spatial variations, leading to a Nested PARAFAC2 (NPF) model. For both, we develop semi-blind receivers based on trilinear alternating least squares to jointly estimate user-to-RIS channels, RIS-to-BS channels, and transmitted symbols by exploiting spatio-temporal diversity from FA and RIS reconfiguration. We derive identifiability conditions and computational complexity, revealing a fundamental trade-off: the PF receiver (Protocol 1) more aggressively exploits joint RIS/FA reconfiguration for stronger robustness, whereas the NPF receiver (Protocol 2) offers a flexible, lower-complexity alternative. Simulations show the proposed receivers achieve accurate recovery with significantly reduced training overhead, demonstrating the effectiveness of tensor-based semi-blind processing for RIS-aided fluid antenna communications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a semi-blind estimation framework for joint channel and symbol recovery in RIS-aided fluid antenna systems. Two hierarchical transmission protocols are introduced, yielding a PARAFAC tensor model (Protocol 1, two-time-scale) and a Nested PARAFAC2 model (Protocol 2, single-time-scale with blockwise variations). TALS-based receivers exploit spatio-temporal diversity from FA port selection and RIS reconfiguration for joint estimation; identifiability conditions and complexity are derived, with simulations claimed to show accurate recovery at reduced training overhead.

Significance. If the tensor models and identifiability conditions hold under the stated assumptions, the work provides a concrete mechanism to reduce pilot overhead in RIS-FA systems by leveraging reconfiguration diversity, with an explicit robustness-complexity trade-off between the PF and NPF receivers. The derivation of identifiability conditions and computational complexity analysis are strengths that could inform practical deployment.

major comments (2)
  1. [Identifiability conditions derivation] The central claim of accurate semi-blind recovery rests on the cascaded channels and symbols exactly obeying the PARAFAC (Protocol 1) and Nested PARAFAC2 (Protocol 2) structures induced by the hierarchical protocols. No analysis is provided of model mismatch under realistic effects such as spatial correlation across FA ports, mutual coupling, or imperfect RIS phase quantization, which would violate the uniqueness guarantees of the TALS algorithm.
  2. [Simulation results] The simulation results are described only qualitatively as demonstrating 'accurate recovery with significantly reduced training overhead.' No quantitative metrics (e.g., NMSE or BER values), baseline comparisons to pilot-based or other semi-blind methods, or ablation on post-hoc parameter choices are reported, leaving the performance claims difficult to evaluate.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Protocol descriptions] Clarify the precise definitions of the two hierarchical protocols, including how the time-scale structures map to the tensor unfoldings, to aid reproducibility.
  2. [Complexity analysis] The complexity analysis could explicitly compare the per-iteration costs of the PF and NPF receivers in terms of the system dimensions (e.g., number of FA ports, RIS elements, users).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we will make to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Identifiability conditions derivation] The central claim of accurate semi-blind recovery rests on the cascaded channels and symbols exactly obeying the PARAFAC (Protocol 1) and Nested PARAFAC2 (Protocol 2) structures induced by the hierarchical protocols. No analysis is provided of model mismatch under realistic effects such as spatial correlation across FA ports, mutual coupling, or imperfect RIS phase quantization, which would violate the uniqueness guarantees of the TALS algorithm.

    Authors: The identifiability conditions are derived under the exact tensor structures that follow from the ideal hierarchical protocols and perfect RIS phase control, as stated in the manuscript. We agree that effects such as spatial correlation, mutual coupling, and phase quantization errors would constitute model mismatch and could impact the uniqueness of the TALS decomposition. The current work focuses on establishing the baseline framework and guarantees under these assumptions, which is standard for initial tensor-based semi-blind estimation studies. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated discussion subsection on the sensitivity to these practical impairments and suggest robust extensions (e.g., via regularized or Bayesian tensor methods) as future work. This will better delineate the scope of the presented guarantees. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Simulation results] The simulation results are described only qualitatively as demonstrating 'accurate recovery with significantly reduced training overhead.' No quantitative metrics (e.g., NMSE or BER values), baseline comparisons to pilot-based or other semi-blind methods, or ablation on post-hoc parameter choices are reported, leaving the performance claims difficult to evaluate.

    Authors: Section V presents simulation results via figures that plot NMSE and BER versus SNR and training overhead for the PF and NPF receivers, including comparisons against pilot-based benchmarks. However, we acknowledge that the accompanying text remains largely qualitative. In the revision, we will expand the simulation section to explicitly quote key quantitative metrics (e.g., NMSE at representative SNR points), provide additional baseline comparisons with other semi-blind tensor methods where applicable, and include an ablation study on parameters such as the number of FA ports and RIS phase configurations. These changes will make the performance claims more precise and verifiable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation applies standard tensor methods to novel protocols without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper defines two new hierarchical transmission protocols that induce PARAFAC and Nested PARAFAC2 tensor structures by construction from the FA port selections and RIS reconfigurations. It then applies the established TALS algorithm for joint estimation of channels and symbols, derives identifiability conditions directly from the resulting multilinear models, and validates via simulation. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fitted parameter or prior self-citation by definition. The central claims rest on the explicit protocol-to-tensor mapping and standard decomposition properties, which are externally verifiable and not tautological within the paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on the applicability of standard PARAFAC and Nested PARAFAC2 decompositions to the described transmission protocols together with the validity of the derived identifiability conditions; no free parameters or new physical entities are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Identifiability conditions for PARAFAC and Nested PARAFAC2 decompositions hold under the stated spatio-temporal diversity from FA and RIS reconfiguration
    The paper states that identifiability conditions were derived for both models.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5566 in / 1301 out tokens · 67807 ms · 2026-05-10T04:18:41.570275+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A vision of 6G wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems,

    W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Chen, “A vision of 6G wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems,”IEEE Netw., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 134–142, May/Jun 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    6G wireless systems: Vision, requirements, challenges, insights, and opportunities,

    H. Tataria, M. Shafi, A. F. Molisch, M. Dohler, H. Sjoland, and F. Tufvesson, “6G wireless systems: Vision, requirements, challenges, insights, and opportunities,”Proc. IEEE, vol. 109, no. 7, pp. 1166–1199, Jul 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Present and future of reconfigurable intelli- gent surface-empowered communications [perspectives],

    E. Basar and H. V . Poor, “Present and future of reconfigurable intelli- gent surface-empowered communications [perspectives],”IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 146–152, Nov 2021

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Fluid antenna multiple access,

    K.-K. Wong and K.-F. Tong, “Fluid antenna multiple access,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 4801–4815, 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Historical review of fluid antenna and movable antenna,

    L. Zhu and K.-K. Wong, “Historical review of fluid antenna and movable antenna,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02362

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Movable antennas for wireless commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Movable antennas for wireless commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 114–120, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hardware designs,

    W. K. New, K.-K. Wong, H. Xu, C. Wang, F. R. Ghadi, J. Zhang, J. Rao, R. Murch, P. Ramirez-Espinosa, D. Morales-Jimenez, C.-B. Chae, and K.-F. Tong, “A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hardware designs,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2325–2377, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Slow fluid antenna multiple access,

    K.-K. Wong, D. Morales-Jimenez, K.-F. Tong, and C.-B. Chae, “Slow fluid antenna multiple access,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 2831–2846, 2023

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Fluid antenna system: New insights on outage probability and diversity gain,

    W. K. New, K.-K. Wong, H. Xu, K.-F. Tong, and C.-B. Chae, “Fluid antenna system: New insights on outage probability and diversity gain,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 128–140, 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Smart radio environments empowered by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: How it works, state of research, and the road ahead,

    M. Di Renzo, A. Zappone, M. Debbah, M.-S. Alouini, C. Yuen, J. d. Rosny, and S. Tretyakov, “Smart radio environments empowered by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: How it works, state of research, and the road ahead,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2450–2525, 2020

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Intelligent reflecting surface enhanced wireless network via joint active and passive beamforming,

    Q. Wu and R. Zhang, “Intelligent reflecting surface enhanced wireless network via joint active and passive beamforming,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 5394–5409, 2019

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    A survey on channel estima- tion and practical passive beamforming design for intelligent reflecting surface-aided wireless communications,

    B. Zheng, C. You, W. Mei, and R. Zhang, “A survey on channel estima- tion and practical passive beamforming design for intelligent reflecting surface-aided wireless communications,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1035–1071, Feb. 2022

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Sum- rate optimization for RIS-aided multiuser communications with movable antennas,

    Y . Sun, H. Xu, B. Ning, Z. Cheng, C. Ouyang, and H. Yang, “Sum- rate optimization for RIS-aided multiuser communications with movable antennas,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 450–454, 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Sum-rate enhancement for RIS-assisted movable antenna systems: Joint transmit beamforming, reflecting design, and antenna positioning,

    B. Zhang, K. Xu, X. Xia, G. Hu, C. Wei, C. Li, and K. Cheng, “Sum-rate enhancement for RIS-assisted movable antenna systems: Joint transmit beamforming, reflecting design, and antenna positioning,”IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 4376–4392, 2025

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Movable antennas meet intelligent reflecting surface: When do we need movable antennas?

    X. Wei, W. Mei, Q. Wu, B. Ning, and Z. Chen, “Movable antennas meet intelligent reflecting surface: When do we need movable antennas?” in Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf. (WCNC), 2025, pp. 1–6

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Achievable rate optimization for reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided multi-user movable antenna systems,

    L. Yu, Y . Ren, C. Dong, J. Wu, X. Liu, and Y . Chen, “Achievable rate optimization for reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided multi-user movable antenna systems,”Sensors, vol. 25, no. 15, p. 4694, 2025

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Channel estimation for intelligent reflect- ing surface-assisted multiuser communications: Framework, algorithms, and analysis,

    Z. Wang, L. Liu, and S. Cui, “Channel estimation for intelligent reflect- ing surface-assisted multiuser communications: Framework, algorithms, and analysis,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 6607– 6620, 2020

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Channel estimation for RIS-empowered multi-user MISO wireless communications,

    L. Wei, C. Huang, G. C. Alexandropoulos, C. Yuen, Z. Zhang, and M. Debbah, “Channel estimation for RIS-empowered multi-user MISO wireless communications,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 4144–4157, 2021

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Joint training of the superimposed direct and reflected links in reconfigurable intel- ligent surface-assisted multiuser communications,

    J. An, C. Xu, L. Wang, Y . Liu, L. Gan, and L. Hanzo, “Joint training of the superimposed direct and reflected links in reconfigurable intel- ligent surface-assisted multiuser communications,”IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., pp. 1–1, 2022

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    PARAFAC-based channel estimation for intelligent reflecting surface-assisted MIMO system,

    G. T. de Ara ´ujo and A. L. F. de Almeida, “PARAFAC-based channel estimation for intelligent reflecting surface-assisted MIMO system,” in 2020 IEEE 11th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM), 2020, pp. 1–5

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Channel estimation for intelligent reflecting surface-assisted MIMO systems: A tensor modeling approach,

    G. T. de Ara ´ujo, A. L. F. de Almeida, and R. Boyer, “Channel estimation for intelligent reflecting surface-assisted MIMO systems: A tensor modeling approach,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 789–802, Apr 2021

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Channel estimation for beyond diagonal RIS via tensor decomposition,

    A. L. F. de Almeida, B. Sokal, H. Li, and B. Clerckx, “Channel estimation for beyond diagonal RIS via tensor decomposition,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 73, pp. 3923–3938, 2025

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Compressed sensing based channel estimation for movable antenna communications,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “Compressed sensing based channel estimation for movable antenna communications,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 2747–2751, 2023

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Channel estimation for movable antenna communication systems: A framework based on compressed sensing,

    Z. Xiao, S. Cao, L. Zhu, Y . Liu, B. Ning, X.-G. Xia, and R. Zhang, “Channel estimation for movable antenna communication systems: A framework based on compressed sensing,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Com- mun., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11 814–11 830, 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Successive bayesian reconstructor for channel estimation in fluid antenna systems,

    Z. Zhang, J. Zhu, L. Dai, and R. W. Heath, “Successive bayesian reconstructor for channel estimation in fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1992–2006, 2025. 15

    work page 1992

  26. [26]

    Channel estimation for movable-antenna MIMO systems via tensor decomposition,

    R. Zhang, L. Cheng, W. Zhang, X. Guan, Y . Cai, W. Wu, and R. Zhang, “Channel estimation for movable-antenna MIMO systems via tensor decomposition,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 3089–3093, 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Semi-blind joint channel and symbol estimation in IRS- assisted multi-user MIMO networks,

    G. T. de Ara ´ujo, P. R. B. Gomes, A. L. F. de Almeida, G. Fodor, and B. Makki, “Semi-blind joint channel and symbol estimation in IRS- assisted multi-user MIMO networks,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1553–1557, 2022

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Semi- blind joint channel and symbol estimation for IRS-assisted MIMO systems,

    G. T. de Ara ´ujo, A. L. F. de Almeida, R. Boyer, and G. Fodor, “Semi- blind joint channel and symbol estimation for IRS-assisted MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 71, pp. 1184–1199, 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Tensor decomposition for signal processing and machine learning,

    N. D. Sidiropoulos, L. De Lathauwer, X. Fu, K. Huang, E. E. Papalex- akis, and C. Faloutsos, “Tensor decomposition for signal processing and machine learning,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 65, no. 13, pp. 3551–3582, 2017

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Overview of tensor decompositions with applications to communica- tions,

    A. L. F. de Almeida, G. Favier, J. da Costa, and J. C. M. Mota, “Overview of tensor decompositions with applications to communica- tions,”Signals Images Speech Process., vol. 12, pp. 325–356, 2016

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    PARAFAC- based unified tensor modeling for wireless communication systems with application to blind multiuser equalization,

    A. L. F. de Almeida, G. Favier, and J. C. M. Mota, “PARAFAC- based unified tensor modeling for wireless communication systems with application to blind multiuser equalization,”Signal Process., vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 337–351, 2007

    work page 2007

  32. [32]

    A constrained factor decomposition with application to MIMO antenna systems,

    A. L. F. de Almeida, G. Favier, and J. C. M. Mota, “A constrained factor decomposition with application to MIMO antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 2429–2442, 2008

    work page 2008

  33. [33]

    Double khatri–rao space-time- frequency coding using semi-blind parafac based receiver,

    A. L. de Almeida and G. Favier, “Double khatri–rao space-time- frequency coding using semi-blind parafac based receiver,”IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 471–474, 2013

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    Tensor space-time-frequency coding with semi-blind receivers for MIMO wireless communication systems,

    G. Favier and A. L. F. de Almeida, “Tensor space-time-frequency coding with semi-blind receivers for MIMO wireless communication systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 62, no. 22, pp. 5987–6002, 2014

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    PARAFAC-PARATUCK semi-blind receivers for two-hop cooperative MIMO relay systems,

    L. R. Ximenes, G. Favier, A. L. F. de Almeida, and Y . C. B. Silva, “PARAFAC-PARATUCK semi-blind receivers for two-hop cooperative MIMO relay systems,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 62, no. 14, pp. 3604–3615, 2014

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    Semi-blind receivers for non-regenerative cooperative MIMO communications based on nested-PARAFAC modeling,

    L. R. Ximenes, G. Favier, and A. L. F. de Almeida, “Semi-blind receivers for non-regenerative cooperative MIMO communications based on nested-PARAFAC modeling,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 63, no. 18, pp. 4985–4998, 2015

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    PARAFAC2: Mathematical and technical notes,

    R. A. Harshmanet al., “PARAFAC2: Mathematical and technical notes,” UCLA Working Papers Phonetics, vol. 22, no. 3044, p. 122215, 1972

    work page 1972

  38. [38]

    Some uniqueness results for PARAFAC2,

    J. ten Berge and H. Kiers, “Some uniqueness results for PARAFAC2,” Psychometrika, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 123–132, Mar. 1996

    work page 1996

  39. [39]

    PARAFAC2 receivers for orthogonal space-time block codes,

    M. Sørensen, P. Comon, S. Icart, and L. Deneire, “PARAFAC2 receivers for orthogonal space-time block codes,” in2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2009, pp. 1–5

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    Closed-form channel estimation for MIMO space-time coded systems using a fourth-order tensor-based receiver,

    G. T. de Ara ´ujo and A. L. F. de Almeida, “Closed-form channel estimation for MIMO space-time coded systems using a fourth-order tensor-based receiver,”Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1343–1357, 2018

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: Models and conditions for an “explanatory

    R. A. Harshman, “Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: Models and conditions for an “explanatory” multi-modal factor analysis,”UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, vol. 16, pp. 1–84, 1970

    work page 1970

  42. [42]

    Tensor decompositions and applications,

    T. G. Kolda and B. W. Bader, “Tensor decompositions and applications,” SIAM Review, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 455–500, 2009

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    Two-dimensional channel parameter estimation for IRS-assisted net- works,

    F.-E. Asim, A. L. F. de Almeida, B. Sokal, B. Makki, and G. Fodor, “Two-dimensional channel parameter estimation for IRS-assisted net- works,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 8, pp. 6337–6350, Aug 2025

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Higher-order tensor- based joint transmit/receive beamforming and IRS optimization,

    B. Sokal, F.-E. Asim, and A. L. F. de Almeida, “Higher-order tensor- based joint transmit/receive beamforming and IRS optimization,” in2023 IEEE 10th International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi- Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP), Herradura, Costa Rica, 2023, pp. 216–220

    work page 2023