arxiv: 2604.18149 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY· math.DS

Recognition: unknown

Informativity of Data-Knowledge Pairs for Lyapunov Equations

Ikumi Banno

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SYmath.DS

keywords joint informativitydata-knowledge pairsLyapunov equationsdata-driven analysisprior knowledgedynamical systemsuniqueness conditions

0 comments

The pith

An algebraic condition checks when a dataset plus prior knowledge uniquely determines the solution to a Lyapunov equation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the idea of data informativity to cases where partial prior knowledge about a dynamical system is also available. It defines joint informativity for such data-knowledge pairs and derives a purely algebraic test that is equivalent to this property. The test applies across a broad range of possible prior-knowledge forms, including special cases that yield extra structure. If the condition holds, the Lyapunov equation has a unique solution that can be computed directly from the data and the knowledge without needing a complete system model. This matters for data-driven stability analysis and control design, where full models are often unavailable but some facts about the system are known.

Core claim

Joint informativity of a data-knowledge pair is defined as the property that the pair determines a unique solution to the Lyapunov equation. An algebraic equivalent condition for this joint informativity is derived that works for a wide class of prior knowledge. The condition combines data matrices with the prior knowledge in a way that certifies uniqueness of the solution. Special cases of the prior knowledge are examined to obtain further characterizations.

What carries the argument

The algebraic equivalent condition for joint informativity of data-knowledge pairs, which combines measured data with prior system information to certify uniqueness of the Lyapunov solution.

If this is right

When the algebraic condition is satisfied, the Lyapunov equation admits a unique solution recoverable from the data and knowledge alone.
The same algebraic test works for many different forms of prior knowledge without requiring a complete system model.
Special choices of prior knowledge yield additional structural properties of the informativity condition.
The approach supports direct verification of uniqueness without first solving the Lyapunov equation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same style of algebraic test could be attempted for other matrix equations such as Riccati equations that arise in optimal control.
Incorporating interval bounds or sign constraints as prior knowledge might produce practical informativity tests for uncertain systems.
Running the condition on benchmark control datasets could reveal how much prior knowledge is typically needed to reach uniqueness.

Load-bearing premise

Prior knowledge about the system can be written in a form that algebraically combines with the data to produce a uniqueness test for the Lyapunov solution.

What would settle it

A concrete dataset and prior-knowledge pair for which the algebraic condition holds but the Lyapunov equation admits more than one solution consistent with both, or the condition fails yet the solution is nevertheless unique.

read the original abstract

In the past few years, data informativity with prior knowledge has attracted increasing attention. This line of research aims to characterize a dataset on a dynamical system that enables system analysis or design only by the dataset and given prior knowledge on the system. In this paper, we investigate such a characterization for the data-driven problem of computing a unique solution to Lyapunov equations. First, we introduce a notion of joint informativity for data-knowledge pairs as an extension of the standard informativity concept. Second, we derive an algebraic equivalent condition for the joint informativity. Finally, we provide further insights into the joint informativity by considering a special case of prior knowledge. The characterization presented in this paper is developed for a wide class of prior knowledge, enabling the incorporation of various forms of system information.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper extends informativity to data-knowledge pairs and derives an algebraic uniqueness condition for Lyapunov solutions, staying within a narrow but well-defined slice of data-driven control.

read the letter

The core move here is defining joint informativity for a dataset plus prior knowledge and then giving an algebraic condition that guarantees a unique solution to the Lyapunov equation. That condition is the main new piece; it generalizes the standard informativity setup without requiring the data alone to be rich enough. They also work out a special case of the prior knowledge to show how the idea plays out in practice, and they keep the setup general enough to cover various forms of side information. That is useful incremental work in the data-driven Lyapunov literature, where people already care about minimal data requirements and now want to fold in known structure cleanly. The algebraic route they take looks direct and avoids unnecessary machinery. The limitation is the narrow target: everything stays inside Lyapunov equations, so the result does not immediately transfer to other analysis or design problems. The abstract claims a wide class of prior knowledge, but the actual payoff is still tied to this one equation type, which caps the reach. No obvious circularity or post-hoc fitting shows up in the framing, and the derivation is presented as following from the definitions rather than assumed. This is the kind of paper that belongs in a specialized control-theory venue. Readers already following informativity papers will get a usable new tool; outsiders will not find much to take away. It is solid enough on its own terms to merit a serious referee rather than a desk reject, though the review will likely focus on whether the algebraic condition holds up under the stated assumptions and whether the special case adds enough insight.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper extends the notion of data informativity to data-knowledge pairs for the data-driven computation of unique solutions to Lyapunov equations. It defines joint informativity, derives an algebraic condition equivalent to this informativity (ensuring uniqueness of the Lyapunov solution), specializes the result to one form of prior knowledge, and claims the framework applies to a wide class of prior knowledge.

Significance. If the algebraic equivalence holds, the result offers a concrete, checkable criterion for when partial data combined with prior knowledge suffices to uniquely solve Lyapunov equations without requiring full system identification. This could reduce data needs in stability analysis and control design, building directly on informativity literature with a verifiable algebraic test.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the claim of an 'algebraic equivalent condition' is stated at a high level without even a schematic form of the condition or the key matrices involved; adding one sentence with the structure of the condition would improve accessibility without lengthening the abstract.
The specialization to a special case of prior knowledge is presented as providing 'further insights,' but the manuscript does not explicitly compare the general algebraic condition to the specialized one (e.g., via a remark or corollary) to show what is gained or lost.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. The description accurately reflects the paper's contributions on joint informativity for data-knowledge pairs in Lyapunov equations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper defines joint informativity for data-knowledge pairs as an explicit extension of the standard informativity concept, then derives an algebraic equivalence condition for uniqueness of the Lyapunov solution and specializes it to one prior-knowledge case. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the algebraic condition is obtained directly from the stated definitions of informativity and the Lyapunov equation without renaming known results or smuggling ansatzes via prior work. The wide-class claim is a scope statement, not a premise that collapses into the result. This matches the reader's assessment that the condition is derived rather than presupposed.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides insufficient detail to fully audit; the work likely rests on standard domain assumptions from systems theory.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The underlying system is linear time-invariant, allowing Lyapunov equations to be well-posed.
Lyapunov equations are standard for LTI stability analysis; implied by the problem setup.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5424 in / 1000 out tokens · 23719 ms · 2026-05-10T04:05:44.624605+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

From model-based control to data-driven control: Survey, classification and perspective,

Z. S. Hou and Z. Wang, “From model-based control to data-driven control: Survey, classification and perspective,”Information Sciences, vol. 235, pp. 3–35, 2013

2013
[2]

H. J. van Waarde, M. K. Camlibel, and H. L. Trentelman,Data-Based Linear Systems and Control Theory, Kindle Direct Publishing, 2025

2025
[3]

Ljung,System Identification: Theory for the User, Prentice-Hall, 1987

L. Ljung,System Identification: Theory for the User, Prentice-Hall, 1987

1987
[4]

Iterative feedback tuning: Theory and applications,

H. Hjalmarsson, M. Gevers, S. Gunnarsson, and O. Lequin, “Iterative feedback tuning: Theory and applications,”IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 26–41, 1998

1998
[5]

Adaptive optimal control for continuous-time linear systems based on policy iteration,

D. Vrabie, O. Pastravanu, M. Abu-Khalaf, and F. L. Lewis, “Adaptive optimal control for continuous-time linear systems based on policy iteration,”Automatica, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 477–484, 2009

2009
[6]

Formulas for data-driven control: Stabi- lization, optimality, and robustness,

C. De Persis and P. Tesi, “Formulas for data-driven control: Stabi- lization, optimality, and robustness,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 909–924, 2019

2019
[7]

Topology recon- struction of dynamical networks via constrained Lyapunov equations,

H. J. van Waarde, P. Tesi, and M. K. Camlibel, “Topology recon- struction of dynamical networks via constrained Lyapunov equations,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 4300– 4306, 2019

2019
[8]

Combining prior knowledge and data for robust controller design,

J. Berberich, C. W. Scherer, and F. Allg ¨ower, “Combining prior knowledge and data for robust controller design,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 4618–4633, 2022

2022
[9]

Hybrid data-enabled predictive control: Incorporating model knowledge into the DeePC,

J. D. Watson, “Hybrid data-enabled predictive control: Incorporating model knowledge into the DeePC,” arXiv:2502.12467, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[10]

Data informativity: A new perspective on data-driven analysis and control,

H. J. van Waarde, J. Eising, H. L. Trentelman, and M. K. Camlibel, “Data informativity: A new perspective on data-driven analysis and control,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 4753–4768, 2020

2020
[11]

The informativity approach: To data-driven analysis and control,

H. J. van Waarde, J. Eising, M. K. Camlibel, and H. L. Trentelman, “The informativity approach: To data-driven analysis and control,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 32–66, 2023

2023
[12]

Data-driven characterizations of suboptimal LQR andH 2 controllers,

H. J. van Waarde and M. Mesbahi, “Data-driven characterizations of suboptimal LQR andH 2 controllers,”IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 4234–4239, 2020

2020
[13]

An informativity approach to the data-driven algebraic regulator problem,

H. L. Trentelman, H. J. van Waarde, and M. K. Camlibel, “An informativity approach to the data-driven algebraic regulator problem,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 6227– 6233, 2022

2022
[14]

Data informativity for Lyapunov equations,

I. Banno, S. Azuma, R. Ariizumi, T. Asai, and J. Imura, “Data informativity for Lyapunov equations,”IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 7, pp. 2365–2370, 2023

2023
[15]

Data informativity for output controllability Gramians and its duality,

I. Banno, “Data informativity for output controllability Gramians and its duality,” inProceedings of IEEE 64th Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3220–3225, 2025

2025
[16]

Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units

A. Shakouri, H. J. van Waarde, T. M. J. T. Baltussen, and W. P. M. H. Heemels, “Data-driven stabilization using prior knowledge on stabilizability and controllability,” arXiv:1508.07909, 2025

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[17]

Data informativity for analysis and design of positive systems,

T. Iwata, S. Azuma, M. Nagahara, D. Peaucelle, and Y . Ebihara, “Data informativity for analysis and design of positive systems,”IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 9, pp. 2651–2656, 2025

2025
[18]

Data- driven stabilization of polynomial systems using density functions,

H. Huang, M. K. Camlibel, R. Carloni, and H. J. van Waarde, “Data- driven stabilization of polynomial systems using density functions,” arXiv:2503.07092, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

D. S. Bernstein,Scalar, Vector, and Matrix Mathematics: Theory, Facts, and Formulas - Revised and Expanded Edition, Princeton University Press, 2018

2018
[20]

R. T. Rockafellar,Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, 1970. APPENDIX A. Proof of Proposition 1 In this section, we show Proposition 1. AssumeA∈relint(Σ pk). SinceA∈Σ D, we have A∈Σ D ∩relint(Σ pk).(79) Meanwhile,Σ D ∩relint(Σpk)can be transformed as follows. ΣD ∩relint(Σ pk) = relint(ΣD)∩relint(Σ pk) = relint(ΣD ∩Σ pk).(80) Both equalities follow...

1970