Simulation of Switching Converters on the Level of Averaged Voltages and Currents
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:27 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Switching converters can be simulated by running an averaged model with switching cells and then reconstructing instantaneous waveforms via quasi-steady-state and linear ripple approximations.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
An algorithm based on simulation of the averaged circuit model with the switching cell concept, followed by reconstruction of instantaneous values through quasi-steady-state and linear ripple approximation, correctly simulates switching converters operating in both continuous and discontinuous conduction modes.
What carries the argument
The switching cell concept that produces an averaged model whose outputs are then turned into instantaneous waveforms by the quasi-steady-state and linear ripple approximation.
If this is right
- The method supplies both averaged quantities and reconstructed instantaneous waveforms for buck, boost, and buck-boost converters in continuous and discontinuous modes.
- A modest generalization of the switching cell allows the same procedure to be used for the flyback converter.
- Simulation remains on the level of averaged voltages and currents yet still yields ripple information without solving the full switched equations at every time step.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- If the reconstruction step remains accurate across a wide range of switching frequencies, the method could serve as a fast inner loop inside optimization routines that size inductors and capacitors.
- The same averaged-model-plus-reconstruction pattern might be tried on other isolated topologies once their switching cells are defined.
- Because the underlying simulation is continuous-time averaged, the approach could be combined with standard circuit simulators that already handle averaged models.
Load-bearing premise
The quasi-steady-state assumption together with linear ripple approximation is accurate enough to reconstruct instantaneous waveforms from the averaged simulation, and the switching cell idea extends to the flyback converter with only minor changes.
What would settle it
Run the proposed averaged simulation plus reconstruction on a buck converter in discontinuous mode and compare the resulting inductor current and capacitor voltage ripples against both a full switched-model simulation and laboratory measurements taken at the same operating point.
Figures
read the original abstract
An algorithm for simulation of switching converters is proposed in the paper. The algorithm is based on simulation of averaged circuit model applying "switching cell" concept, and construction of instantaneous values of the waveforms using quasi steady state and linear ripple approximation. Simulation covers converters operating both in the continuous and the discontinuous conduction mode. Application of the algorithm is demonstrated by simulation results of all three of the basic converters: buck, boost and buck-boost, as well as a flyback converter, which required slight generalization of the switching cell concept.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper proposes an algorithm for simulating switching converters by first simulating an averaged circuit model based on the 'switching cell' concept, then reconstructing instantaneous voltage and current waveforms using quasi-steady-state assumptions combined with linear ripple approximations. The approach is stated to cover both continuous conduction mode (CCM) and discontinuous conduction mode (DCM) and is demonstrated via simulation results on the buck, boost, and buck-boost converters plus a flyback converter requiring a slight generalization of the switching cell.
Significance. If the reconstruction step proves accurate, the method could enable efficient averaged-level simulation while still providing usable instantaneous waveform details, offering a practical middle ground between pure averaged models and full cycle-by-cycle switching simulation for converter design and analysis. The extension to DCM and the flyback topology indicates potential generality beyond the most basic cases.
major comments (3)
- [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that quasi-steady-state plus linear ripple approximation can faithfully recover instantaneous waveforms (including zero intervals in DCM) is load-bearing for the algorithm's added value, yet the abstract provides no equations for the switching cell, no error metrics (RMS, peak, or waveform comparison), and no side-by-side validation against cycle-by-cycle switching simulation or hardware measurements for any of the four examples.
- [Abstract (demonstration paragraph)] Demonstration of DCM operation: In DCM the duration of the zero-current interval depends directly on the instantaneous values; any deviation from linearity or from the quasi-steady-state premise alters the reconstructed zero-crossing and therefore feeds back into the averaged quantities, but no quantitative assessment of this sensitivity is supplied.
- [Abstract] Flyback generalization: The abstract describes the extension of the switching cell to the flyback as 'slight' to accommodate the transformer turns ratio and magnetizing current, but supplies neither the explicit averaged cell equations nor a demonstration that they remain exact under the same quasi-steady-state and linear-ripple assumptions used for the non-isolated converters.
minor comments (1)
- [Abstract] The abstract states 'all three of the basic converters' and then lists buck, boost, buck-boost plus flyback; a minor wording clarification would avoid any miscount.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the constructive comments and for recognizing the potential practical value of the proposed simulation approach. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned for the manuscript.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that quasi-steady-state plus linear ripple approximation can faithfully recover instantaneous waveforms (including zero intervals in DCM) is load-bearing for the algorithm's added value, yet the abstract provides no equations for the switching cell, no error metrics (RMS, peak, or waveform comparison), and no side-by-side validation against cycle-by-cycle switching simulation or hardware measurements for any of the four examples.
Authors: We agree that the abstract is too concise to convey these elements. The switching-cell equations appear in Section II, and Section IV already contains side-by-side waveform comparisons against cycle-by-cycle switching simulation for all four converters (buck, boost, buck-boost, flyback). To make the abstract self-contained, we will revise it to include a short statement on the validation approach and the observed agreement levels. Hardware measurements lie outside the scope of this simulation-oriented work; the existing cycle-by-cycle comparisons will be highlighted more explicitly in the revised text. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Abstract (demonstration paragraph)] Demonstration of DCM operation: In DCM the duration of the zero-current interval depends directly on the instantaneous values; any deviation from linearity or from the quasi-steady-state premise alters the reconstructed zero-crossing and therefore feeds back into the averaged quantities, but no quantitative assessment of this sensitivity is supplied.
Authors: The concern about feedback from the linear-ripple approximation into the zero-crossing time in DCM is valid. While the manuscript demonstrates DCM waveforms for the three basic converters, it does not contain a dedicated sensitivity study. We will add a short quantitative assessment (e.g., tabulated errors in zero-crossing instant and resulting averaged quantities versus load) in the revised results section. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Abstract] Flyback generalization: The abstract describes the extension of the switching cell to the flyback as 'slight' to accommodate the transformer turns ratio and magnetizing current, but supplies neither the explicit averaged cell equations nor a demonstration that they remain exact under the same quasi-steady-state and linear-ripple assumptions used for the non-isolated converters.
Authors: The abstract indeed omits the explicit equations. The full manuscript explains the adaptation for the transformer and magnetizing current, and the flyback simulation results are generated under the same assumptions. We will insert the explicit averaged-cell equations for the flyback case into Section II and add a brief paragraph confirming that the quasi-steady-state and linear-ripple premises continue to hold, supported by the existing simulation comparison. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity; constructive simulation procedure based on standard averaged modeling
full rationale
The paper describes a forward simulation algorithm that applies the switching-cell concept to averaged circuit models and reconstructs instantaneous waveforms via quasi-steady-state and linear-ripple approximations. This is a modeling and approximation choice followed by numerical demonstration on buck, boost, buck-boost, and flyback converters. No derivation chain reduces a claimed result to fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or a load-bearing self-citation. The reconstruction step is presented as an engineering approximation whose accuracy is illustrated by example waveforms rather than derived by construction from the inputs. The flyback generalization is described as slight and is applied directly without invoking uniqueness theorems or prior self-citations as the sole justification. The method remains self-contained against external benchmarks of averaged modeling practice.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption Quasi steady state approximation holds for the waveforms
- domain assumption Linear ripple approximation is valid
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Vladimirescu, The Spice Book, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994
A. Vladimirescu, The Spice Book, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994
work page 1994
-
[2]
D. Maksimovi ć, A.M. Stankovi ć, V.J. Thottuvelil, G.C. Verghese, Modeling and simu lation of power electronic converters, in: Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 89, No. 6, 2001, pp. 898-912
work page 2001
-
[3]
R. Tymerski, A fast time domain simulator for power electronic systems, in: Proc eedings of Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, San Diego, 1993, pp. 477-483
work page 1993
-
[4]
D. Li, R. Tymerski, T. Ninomiya, PECS-an efficient solution for simulating switched networks with nonlinear elements, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 48 (2) (2001) 367-376
work page 2001
-
[5]
R.W. Erickson, D. Maksimovi ć, Fundamentals of Power Electronics, 2nd ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001
work page 2001
- [6]
-
[7]
R. Tymerski, V. Vorperian, Generation, classification and analysis of switched-mode DC-to-DC converters by the use of converter cells, in: Telecommunications Energy Conference, Toronto, 1986, pp. 181-195
work page 1986
-
[8]
V. Vorperian, R. Tymerski, E quivalent circuit models for resonant and PWM switches, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 4 (2) (1989) 205-214
work page 1989
-
[9]
L.M. Tolbert, F.Z. Peng, F.H. Khan, S. Li, Switching cells and their implications for power electronic circuits, in: 6th International IEEE Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC’09), 2009, pp. 773-779
work page 2009
-
[10]
P. Pejovi ć, Simulation of power electronic converters using quasi steady state approximation, Electronics 16 (2) (2012) 153-158
work page 2012
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.