pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19226 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ⚛️ physics.optics

A divergent-beam surface plasmon resonance architecture for multiplexed malaria biosensing

Amos. S. Kiyumbi , Jordan. H. Hossea This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 02:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords surface plasmon resonancedivergent beammalaria biosensingmultiplexed detectionpLDHHRP-2Kretschmann configurationtransfer matrix modeling
0
0 comments X

The pith

A divergent-beam Kretschmann SPR platform enables camera-based multiplexed detection of malaria biomarkers pLDH and HRP-2 on one gold film.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a numerical model for a surface plasmon resonance sensor that uses a divergent light beam to probe multiple locations on a gold surface at once for detecting two malaria-related proteins. The goal is to achieve multiplexed detection without the usual mechanical movement of the light source or detector. By combining detailed optical calculations with models of how the proteins bind to the surface, the authors estimate how sensitive the system can be. If successful, such a setup could lead to simpler diagnostic tools that measure two markers in a single run.

Core claim

The central claim is that a divergent-beam Kretschmann SPR architecture generated by a Powell lens, paired with transfer-matrix modeling of the prism-gold stack and effective-adlayer descriptions of biomolecular binding, supports quantitative multiplexed malaria biosensing. For representative aptamer-like and antibody-like layers on N-SF11/Au (45 nm), the model keeps the sensing states within 54 to 57 degrees and yields distinct detector-resolvable responses. Benchmarking reproduces a bulk angular sensitivity of 73.2181 degrees per RIU, and combining the optical model with effective-medium and Langmuir descriptions produces model-based detection limits of approximately 5.5 ng mL^{-1} for HRP

What carries the argument

The Powell-lens-generated angular fan in the Kretschmann configuration, which permits simultaneous camera-based angular interrogation of spatially separated regions of interest on a single gold film together with transfer-matrix optical modeling and effective-medium binding descriptions.

If this is right

  • The sensing states for the two biomarkers remain within a narrow 54 to 57 degree window and produce distinct, camera-resolvable angular responses.
  • The combined optical and binding model predicts detection limits of approximately 5.5 ng mL^{-1} for HRP-2 and 5.8 times 10 to the minus 2 ng mL^{-1} for pLDH.
  • The fixed angular fan removes the need for mechanical scanning while maintaining a bulk sensitivity of 73.2181 degrees per RIU.
  • The framework reproduces published water-glycerol resonance positions, confirming the baseline multilayer model before biomarker addition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same optical layout could be reused to test other pairs of biomarkers by swapping only the recognition layers and re-running the effective-medium calculation.
  • Camera readout of the entire angular fan opens a route to simultaneous kinetic monitoring across multiple spots rather than sequential measurements.
  • The numerical approach supplies a template for estimating performance limits in other dual-marker SPR assays before fabricating the physical sensor.

Load-bearing premise

The effective-adlayer description and representative aptamer-like or antibody-like recognition layers, together with the Langmuir isotherm, accurately capture the real optical and binding behavior of pLDH and HRP-2 at the biofunctional interface.

What would settle it

Experimental measurement of the actual resonance angle shifts for known concentrations of pLDH and HRP-2 in the divergent-beam Kretschmann setup, followed by direct comparison to the model's predicted shifts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19226 by Amos. S. Kiyumbi, Jordan. H. Hossea.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Conceptual illustration of the divergent-beam Kretschmann SPR architecture used for multiplexed malaria biomarker sensing, adapted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Conceptual illustration of the divergent-beam Kretschmann [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of the experimentally measured and simulated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Bulk sensing response for representative refractive in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Linear fit of resonance angle θres versus bulk refractive index nbulk for the representative malaria-stage refractive-index range. The fitted slope yields an angular bulk sensitivity of 73.2181 ◦ /RIU with R 2 = 0.9997. quantitative treatment was reported in Ref. [70]. Here we con￾sider two limiting receptor classes: a thin aptamer-like interface of 2 nm and a thicker antibody-like interface of 15 nm [66, … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Calculated effect of baseline biofunctionalisation on the resonance position for the N-SF11/Au platform. A thin aptamer-like biointerface (linker 1) and a thicker antibody-like biointerface (linker 2) are compared in buffer to show how the baseline operating point changes before analyte binding. 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Incident angle in prism, (deg) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Reflectance, R p res,1=54.597° res,2=55.… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison between the resonance angles obtained from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Model-based comparison of local sensing in the aptamer- and antibody-functionalised SPR channels. (a) E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Schematic of the practical divergent-beam SPR configuration used for multiplexed sensing. A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a numerical study of a divergent-beam Kretschmann surface plasmon resonance (SPR) platform for multiplexed malaria biosensing. A Powell-lens-generated angular fan enables camera-based angular interrogation of spatially separated regions of interest on a single Au film, thereby removing the need for mechanical scanning. The framework combines transfer-matrix modelling of the prism/Au multilayer with an effective-adlayer description of biomolecular binding at the biofunctional interface. As a representative dual-biomarker case, we consider plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) and histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP-2). Benchmarking of the N-SF11/Au (45 nm) baseline against published water/glycerol data reproduces the characteristic resonance positions and yields a bulk angular sensitivity of $73.2181 \,^\circ \text{RIU}^{-1}$. With representative aptamer-like and antibody-like recognition layers, the relevant sensing states remain within $54^\circ$ to $57^\circ$ and produce distinct, detector-resolvable responses. Combining the optical model with effective-medium and Langmuir binding descriptions gives model-based detection limits of approximately $5.5\,\text{ng mL}^{-1}$ for HRP-2 and $5.8\times 10^{-2}\,\text{ng mL}^{-1}$ for pLDH. These results support divergent-beam SPR as a viable architecture for quantitative multiplexed malaria biosensing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a numerical investigation of a divergent-beam Kretschmann-configuration SPR sensor using a Powell lens to create an angular fan for simultaneous interrogation of multiple spatially separated regions on a single gold film. This is proposed for multiplexed biosensing of malaria biomarkers pLDH and HRP-2. The approach integrates a transfer-matrix optical model of the prism-gold multilayer with an effective-medium description of the biomolecular adlayer and the Langmuir binding isotherm. Benchmarking against published water/glycerol refractive index data confirms the model's ability to reproduce resonance positions and yields a bulk sensitivity of 73.2181 ° RIU^{-1}. Model predictions indicate that the resonance angles for the sensing states fall between 54° and 57°, producing distinguishable shifts, and calculate detection limits of ~5.5 ng mL^{-1} for HRP-2 and 5.8×10^{-2} ng mL^{-1} for pLDH.

Significance. Should the underlying assumptions prove accurate, this architecture could enable compact, mechanically simple multiplexed SPR platforms suitable for point-of-care diagnostics. A notable strength is the explicit benchmarking of the transfer-matrix model against experimental data, which lends credibility to the optical calculations. The work provides a framework for exploring geometry-specific advantages in SPR biosensing without requiring new hardware fabrication.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results on detection limits] The quantitative detection limits (5.5 ng mL^{-1} for HRP-2 and 5.8×10^{-2} ng mL^{-1} for pLDH) are derived by combining the optical model with effective-medium adlayer parameters and Langmuir constants chosen as 'representative' for aptamer-like and antibody-like layers. No experimental validation, error propagation, or sensitivity analysis to variations in these adlayer thicknesses, refractive indices, or binding constants is reported, despite these parameters being central to translating angular shifts into concentration limits.
  2. [Benchmarking and extension to adlayer] The transfer-matrix model is validated only for bulk refractive index changes using water/glycerol mixtures. The extension to thin effective adlayers representing specific biomarker binding (pLDH and HRP-2) lacks analogous benchmarking or comparison to published SPR data for these antigens, raising questions about the accuracy of the predicted shifts at the low concentrations claimed.
minor comments (3)
  1. The bulk angular sensitivity is given to six significant figures (73.2181 ° RIU^{-1}); this level of precision may exceed the accuracy of the input parameters and could be rounded appropriately.
  2. Provide the specific numerical values and sources for the effective adlayer thickness, refractive index, and Langmuir affinity constants used in the calculations to enhance reproducibility.
  3. Consider adding a figure or table comparing the predicted resonance curves or shifts for the two biomarkers to better illustrate the multiplexed capability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing the strongest honest defense of the work while making revisions where they improve the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The quantitative detection limits (5.5 ng mL^{-1} for HRP-2 and 5.8×10^{-2} ng mL^{-1} for pLDH) are derived by combining the optical model with effective-medium adlayer parameters and Langmuir constants chosen as 'representative' for aptamer-like and antibody-like layers. No experimental validation, error propagation, or sensitivity analysis to variations in these adlayer thicknesses, refractive indices, or binding constants is reported, despite these parameters being central to translating angular shifts into concentration limits.

    Authors: We agree that the reported detection limits are model-derived using representative parameters and that the absence of sensitivity analysis and error propagation is a limitation. As this is a purely numerical study, experimental validation of the specific pLDH and HRP-2 limits cannot be provided. In revision we have added a new section that performs sensitivity analysis by varying adlayer thickness, refractive index, and Langmuir constants over literature ranges for comparable SPR systems, together with a basic error-propagation estimate from the optical model. The results confirm that the detection limits remain within the same order of magnitude under plausible parameter variations. The abstract and discussion have been updated to emphasize that the limits are modeled values. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The transfer-matrix model is validated only for bulk refractive index changes using water/glycerol mixtures. The extension to thin effective adlayers representing specific biomarker binding (pLDH and HRP-2) lacks analogous benchmarking or comparison to published SPR data for these antigens, raising questions about the accuracy of the predicted shifts at the low concentrations claimed.

    Authors: The water/glycerol benchmarking validates the transfer-matrix implementation for the prism-gold multilayer under bulk index changes, which is the core optical model. The thin-adlayer extension employs the standard effective-medium approximation used throughout the SPR literature. In the revised manuscript we have added explicit comparisons to published experimental SPR resonance shifts for protein adlayers of comparable thickness and index, as well as to reported SPR data for malaria biomarkers where available. A new paragraph discusses the assumptions and limitations of the effective-medium description at low surface coverages. While direct experimental benchmarking for pLDH and HRP-2 adlayers is outside the scope of this numerical work, the added literature comparisons provide further support for the modeled shifts. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard external models applied to new geometry yield independent limits

full rationale

The paper computes model-based detection limits by feeding an effective-adlayer description and Langmuir isotherm into the transfer-matrix optical model for the divergent-beam Kretschmann geometry. These components are standard, externally established methods (transfer-matrix for multilayer SPR, effective-medium for adlayers, Langmuir for binding) rather than quantities defined or fitted from the paper's own outputs. Benchmarking reproduces published water/glycerol resonance positions and sensitivity, providing an independent check. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing for the central claims, no parameters are fitted such that the stated limits reduce to those fits by construction, and no ansatz or uniqueness result is smuggled in via prior author work. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the transfer-matrix method for multilayer reflectivity, the effective-adlayer approximation for biomolecular films, and the Langmuir isotherm for surface binding—all standard domain assumptions from prior optics and surface-chemistry literature. No new physical entities are postulated; the only adjustable element highlighted is the 45 nm gold thickness chosen as baseline.

free parameters (1)
  • Gold film thickness
    Baseline value of 45 nm selected for the N-SF11/Au multilayer in the transfer-matrix simulation.
axioms (3)
  • standard math Transfer-matrix method accurately models reflectivity of the prism/Au multilayer
    Invoked for the optical simulation of the Kretschmann configuration.
  • domain assumption Effective-adlayer description captures the optical perturbation caused by biomolecular binding
    Used to link protein adsorption to changes in the resonance condition.
  • domain assumption Langmuir binding isotherm describes the surface coverage of pLDH and HRP-2 on the recognition layers
    Combined with the optical model to obtain concentration-dependent resonance shifts.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5556 in / 1694 out tokens · 75877 ms · 2026-05-10T02:01:48.688300+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Incident angle in prism, (deg) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Reflectance, Rp res,1=54.597° res,2=55.253° nanalyte=1.3350 nanalyte=1.4500 Figure 8

    are compared in buffer to show how the baseline operating point changes before analyte binding. 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Incident angle in prism, (deg) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Reflectance, Rp res,1=54.597° res,2=55.253° nanalyte=1.3350 nanalyte=1.4500 Figure 8. Local-sensing response of the aptamer-like N- SF11/Au(45 nm) configuration before and after addition of...

    work page arXiv

  2. [2]

    Homola, S

    J. Homola, S. S. Yee, and G. Gauglitz, Sensors and actuators B: Chemical54, 3 (1999)

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Homola, Chemical reviews108, 462 (2008)

    J. Homola, Chemical reviews108, 462 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    B. G. Rosa, O. E. Akingbade, X. Guo, L. Gonzalez-Macia, M. A. Crone, L. P. Cameron, P. Freemont, K.-L. Choy, F. Güder, E. Yeatman,et al., Biosensors and Bioelectronics203, 114050 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    M. J. O’Brien, V . H. Pérez-Luna, S. R. J. Brueck, and G. P. López, Biosensors and Bioelectronics16, 97 (2001)

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    D. Wang, J. F. C. Loo, J. Chen, Y . Yam, S.-C. Chen, H. He, S. K. 12 Kong, and H. P. Ho, Sensors19, 1266 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Hopkins, W

    H. Hopkins, W. Kambale, M. R. Kamya, S. G. Staedke, G. Dorsey, and P. J. Rosenthal, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene76, 1092 (2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Yerlikaya, E

    S. Yerlikaya, E. D. Owusu, A. Frimpong, R. K. DeLisle, and X. C. Ding, Clinical Infectious Diseases74, 40 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Moody, Clinical Microbiology Reviews15, 66 (2002)

    A. Moody, Clinical Microbiology Reviews15, 66 (2002)

    work page 2002

  10. [10]

    Wongsrichanalai, M

    C. Wongsrichanalai, M. J. Barcus, S. Muth, A. Sutamihardja, and W. H. Wernsdorfer, The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene77, 119 (2007)

    work page 2007

  11. [11]

    B. Li, Z. Sun, X. Li, X. Li, H. Wang, W. Chen, P. Chen, M. Qiao, and Y . Mao, Archives of Medical Science13, 541 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    I. K. Jang, A. Jiménez, A. Rashid, R. Barney, A. Golden, X. C. Ding, G. J. Domingo, and A. Mayor, Malaria Journal21, 176 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Lynch, T

    E. Lynch, T. O. Jensen, B. Assao, M. Chihana, T. Tur- uho, D. Nyehangane, J. B. Manyok, H. Pasquale, N. Khim, B. Witkowski,et al., Malaria Journal21, 261 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    H. J. Lee, D. Nedelkov, and R. M. Corn, Analytical Chemistry 78, 6504 (2006)

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    Otsuki and M

    S. Otsuki and M. Ishikawa, Biosensors and Bioelectronics26, 202 (2010)

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    Lesuffleur, H

    A. Lesuffleur, H. Im, N. C. Lindquist, K. S. Lim, and S.-H. Oh, Optics Express16, 219 (2008)

    work page 2008

  17. [17]

    H. Im, J. N. Sutherland, J. A. Maynard, and S.-H. Oh, Analytical Chemistry84, 1941 (2012)

    work page 1941

  18. [18]

    S. H. Lee, J. H. Back, H. J. Joo, D. S. Lim, J. E. Lee, and H. J. Lee, Talanta267, 125232 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    J. H. Hossea and J. Widjaja, in2017 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON)(2017) pp. 1–4

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Netphrueksarat, J

    W. Netphrueksarat, J. Widjaja, J. H. Hossea, and P. Meemon, Optik270, 169936 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Koresawa, K

    H. Koresawa, K. Seki, E. Hase, Y . Tokizane, T.-A. Yano, T. Kajisa, T. Minamikawa, and T. Yasui, Optics Continuum 1, 565 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Koresawa, K

    H. Koresawa, K. Seki, K. Nishimoto, E. Hase, Y . Tokizane, T.-A. Yano, T. Kajisa, T. Minamikawa, and T. Yasui, Scientific Reports 13, 15655 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    A. S. Kiyumbi and M. S. Tame, Advanced Metamaterials1, 3 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Raether, inSurface plasmons on smooth and rough surfaces and on gratings(Springer, 2006) pp

    H. Raether, inSurface plasmons on smooth and rough surfaces and on gratings(Springer, 2006) pp. 4–39

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    S. A. Maier,Plasmonics: fundamentals and applications, V ol. 1 (Springer, 2007)

    work page 2007

  26. [26]

    H. H. Nguyen, J. Park, S. Kang, and M. Kim, Sensors15, 10481 (2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    J. H. Hossea, East African Journal of Information Technology7, 412 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    J. H. Hossea and G. Rugumira, East African Journal of Engin- eering7, 148 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    C. H. Park, J. W. Choi, and Y .-H. Cho, Applied Optics49, 2470 (2010)

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    L. Liu, Y . He, Y . Zhang, S. Ma, H. Ma, and J. Guo, Applied Optics47, 5616 (2008)

    work page 2008

  31. [31]

    Zhang, L

    P. Zhang, L. Liu, Y . He, Z. Shen, J. Guo, Y . Ji, and H. Ma, Applied Optics53, 6037 (2014)

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    Karabchevsky, S

    A. Karabchevsky, S. Karabchevsky, and I. Abdulhalim, Journal of Nanophotonics5, 051813 (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    Watad and I

    I. Watad and I. Abdulhalim, Optics Letters44, 1607 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Vashistha, M

    N. Vashistha, M. J. Abuleil, A. M. Shrivastav, A. Bajaj, and I. Abdulhalim, Biosensors13, 173 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Isaacs and I

    S. Isaacs and I. Abdulhalim, Applied Physics Letters106, 193701 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    T. G. Mackay and A. Lakhtakia,The Transfer-Matrix Method in Electromagnetics and Optics(Springer, Cham, 2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    H. Wang, Y . Liu, Y . Yang, T. Deng, G. Shen, and R. Yu, Analyt- ical Biochemistry324, 219 (2004)

    work page 2004

  38. [38]

    S. Gao, J. M. Guisán, and J. Rocha-Martin, Analytica Chimica Acta1189, 338907 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    W. Choe, T. A. Durgannavar, and S. J. Chung, Materials9, 994 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    Ghafoor, G

    B. Ghafoor, G. Hamasalih,et al., Engineering and Technology Journal40, 1334 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Fontana, Applied optics45, 7632 (2006)

    E. Fontana, Applied optics45, 7632 (2006)

    work page 2006

  42. [42]

    S. Lee, K. M. Song, W. Jeon, H. Jo, Y .-B. Shim, and C. Ban, Biosensors and Bioelectronics35, 291 (2012)

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    Cheung, R

    Y .-W. Cheung, R. M. Dirkzwager, W.-C. Wong, J. Cardoso, J. D. N. Costa, and J. A. Tanner, Biochimie145, 131 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    P. Jain, B. Chakma, N. K. Singh, S. Patra, and P. Goswami, Molecular Biotechnology58, 497 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    P. Jain, S. Das, B. Chakma, and P. Goswami, Analytical Bio- chemistry514, 32 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    K. A. Frith, R. Fogel, J. P. D. Goldring, R. G. E. Krause, M. Khati, H. Hoppe, M. E. Cromhout, M. Jiwaji, and J. L. Limson, Malaria Journal17, 191 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    A. S. Kiyumbi and M. S. Tame, Nanoscale Advances8, 1871 (2026)

    work page 2026

  48. [48]

    Piper, L

    R. Piper, L. Wentworth, A. Hunt-Cooke, S. Houze, P. Chiodini, and M. Makler, The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene60, 109 (1999)

    work page 1999

  49. [49]

    N. T. P. Linh, H. I. Park, J. Lee, D.-X. Liu, H.-J. Sohn, H.-N. Kim, J. W. Jang, B.-K. Na, E.-T. Han, and S.-J. Yeo, The Korean Journal of Parasitology55, 623 (2017)

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Rogier, D

    E. Rogier, D. Nace, D. Ljolje, N. W. Lucchi, V . Udhayakumar, and M. Aidoo, The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene102, 1064 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    J. Mu, L. L. Yu, and T. E. Wellems, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology10, 620419 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Lenyk, G

    B. Lenyk, G. Figueroa-Miranda, I. Pavlushko, Y . Lo, J. A. Tan- ner, A. Offenhäusser, and D. Mayer, ChemElectroChem7, 4594 (2020)

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    Minopoli, B

    A. Minopoli, B. Della Ventura, B. Lenyk, F. Gentile, J. A. Tanner, A. Offenhäusser, D. Mayer, and R. Velotta, Nature Communica- tions11, 6134 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Minopoli, B

    A. Minopoli, B. Della Ventura, R. Campanile, J. A. Tanner, A. Offenhäusser, D. Mayer, and R. Velotta, Microchimica Acta 188, 88 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Minopoli, E

    A. Minopoli, E. Scardapane, B. Della Ventura, J. A. Tanner, A. Offenhäusser, D. Mayer, and R. Velotta, ACS Applied Mater- ials & Interfaces14, 6417 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    Chakma, P

    B. Chakma, P. Jain, N. K. Singh, and P. Goswami, Electroana- lysis30, 1847 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    Lo, Y .-W

    Y . Lo, Y .-W. Cheung, L. Wang, M. Lee, G. Figueroa-Miranda, S. Liang, D. Mayer, and J. A. Tanner, Biosensors and Bioelec- tronics192, 113472 (2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    M. K. Sharma, V . K. Rao, G. S. Agarwal, G. P. Rai, N. Gopalan, S. Prakash, S. K. Sharma, and R. Vijayaraghavan, Journal of Clinical Microbiology46, 3759 (2008)

    work page 2008

  59. [59]

    Ravaoarisoa, H

    E. Ravaoarisoa, H. Zamanka, T. Fusai, J. Bellalou, H. Bedouelle, O. Mercereau-Puijalon, and T. Fandeur, mAbs2, 416 (2010)

    work page 2010

  60. [60]

    C. H. Leow, M. Jones, Q. Cheng, S. Mahler, and J. McCarthy, Malaria Journal13, 277 (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    K. Kang, E. E. Dzakah, W. Li, M. Xie, X. Luo, and H. Liu, BMC Microbiology15, 98 (2015)

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    Verma, S

    R. Verma, S. Chandy, N. S. Jayaprakash, A. Manoharan, M. A. Vijayalakshmi, and K. Venkataraman, Pathogens and Global Health111, 297 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    C. M. Kifude, H. G. Rajasekariah, J. Sullivan, David J., V . A. 13 Stewart, E. Angov, S. K. Martin, C. L. Diggs, and J. N. Waitumbi, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology15, 1012 (2008)

    work page 2008

  64. [64]

    Sikarwar, P

    B. Sikarwar, P. K. Sharma, A. Srivastava, M. Boopathi, B. Singh, and Y . K. Jaiswal, Biosensors and Bioelectronics60, 201 (2014)

    work page 2014

  65. [65]

    Loyez, M

    M. Loyez, M. Wells, S. Hambye, F. Hubinon, R. Wattiez, and C. Caucheteur, Malaria Journal20, 332 (2021)

    work page 2021

  66. [66]

    M. E. Parra, C. B. Evans, and D. W. Taylor, Journal of Clinical Microbiology29, 1629 (1991)

    work page 1991

  67. [67]

    Arshavsky-Graham, K

    S. Arshavsky-Graham, K. Urmann, R. Salama, N. Massad-Ivanir, J.-G. Walter, T. Scheper, and E. Segal, Analyst145, 4991 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    Mpofu, S

    K. Mpofu, S. Chauke, L. Thwala, and P. Mthunzi-Kufa, Discover Chemistry2, 23 (2025)

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    N. A. Kaushal and D. C. Kaushal, Immunological Investigations 43, 556 (2014)

    work page 2014

  70. [70]

    W. Y . Royero-Bermeo, M. M. Sánchez-Jiménez, and J. D. Ospina-Villa, Biology Methods and Protocols10, bpaf025 (2025)

    work page 2025

  71. [71]

    L. S. Jung, C. T. Campbell, T. M. Chinowsky, M. N. Mar, and S. S. Yee, Langmuir14, 5636 (1998)

    work page 1998

  72. [72]

    J. C. Maxwell Garnett, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A203, 385 (1904)

    work page 1904

  73. [73]

    Langmuir, Journal of the American Chemical Society40, 1361 (1918)

    I. Langmuir, Journal of the American Chemical Society40, 1361 (1918)

    work page 1918

  74. [74]

    Piliarik and J

    M. Piliarik and J. Homola, Optics Express17, 16505 (2009)

    work page 2009

  75. [75]

    W. Park, K. Nam, and S. Choi, Journal of the Korean Physical Society76, 1010 (2020)

    work page 2020

  76. [76]

    Z. Liu, J. Wu, C. Cai, B. Yang, and Z.-M. Qi, Nature Commu- nications13, 6475 (2022)

    work page 2022

  77. [77]

    Y . Park, M. Diez-Silva, G. Popescu, G. Lykotrafitis, W. Choi, M. S. Feld, and S. Suresh, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America105, 13730 (2008)

    work page 2008

  78. [78]

    M. A. Agnero, K. Konan, Z. G. C. S. Tokou, Y . T. A. Kossonou, B. S. Dion, K. A. Kaduki, and J. T. Zoueu, Sensors19, 3045 (2019)

    work page 2019

  79. [79]

    M. J. Linman, A. Abbas, and Q. Cheng, Analyst135, 2759 (2010)

    work page 2010

  80. [80]

    S. H. Lee, N. C. Lindquist, N. J. Wittenberg, L. R. Jordan, and S.-H. Oh, Lab on a Chip12, 3882 (2012)

    work page 2012

Showing first 80 references.