pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19435 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

SDSSJ110546.07+145202.4: The first long-duration radio changing-look NLS1 galaxy

S. Komossa , D. Grupe , A. Kraus , P.G. Edwards , E.F. Kerrison , K. Rose , R. Soria , T. An
show 7 more authors
M.J. Hardcastle K.E. Gabanyi S. Panda D.W. Xu J. Wang S. Frey A. Mezosi
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA
keywords changing-look AGNNLS1radio outburstaccretion ratejet ignitionsupermassive black holeX-ray spectrumradio SED
0
0 comments X

The pith

An accretion rate change triggered the long-duration radio jet in the NLS1 galaxy SDSSJ110546.07+145202.4.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports the discovery and multi-wavelength follow-up of SDSSJ110546.07+145202.4 as the first long-duration radio changing-look narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy. It shows that the dramatic brightening in radio emission, lasting over eight years, is accompanied by a soft X-ray spectrum with photon index 2.5, low absorption, and a radio SED peaked around 2 GHz. The authors conclude that an increase in the accretion rate onto the central supermassive black hole ignited the powerful radio jet. This scenario fits all the data better than alternatives such as gravitational lensing or a tidal disruption event. The low redshift and black hole mass make this a valuable local example of jet ignition processes thought to occur around growing black holes in the distant universe.

Core claim

SDSSJ110546.07+145202.4 stands out as a unique radio changing-look Narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy that has brightened dramatically and shows an exceptionally long duration of its on phase. The X-ray spectrum is soft, line-of-sight absorption is low, the radio SED is peaked at low frequencies, and the radio outburst emission is very long-lived and roughly constant. The system is well explained by an accretion rate change that triggered the powerful radio jet emission, and its low redshift and SMBH mass offer a unique perspective on radio-jet ignition processes expected in the early Universe.

What carries the argument

Accretion-rate change igniting a radio jet in a narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy, as evidenced by the soft X-ray spectrum and long-lived radio emission.

If this is right

  • Most alternative outburst scenarios can be excluded or are too rare.
  • Similar transients of various types are expected to be detected in ongoing VLA and upcoming SKA surveys.
  • The low redshift and SMBH mass provide a local view of physical processes operating around growing SMBHs in the early Universe.
  • The high Eddington ratio and soft spectrum corroborate the NLS1 classification.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If accretion rate changes commonly ignite jets, this mechanism could explain the radio-loud phase in many AGN.
  • Long-term monitoring of the radio flux could reveal when or if the jet activity declines.
  • Other NLS1 galaxies with similar properties might show comparable long-duration outbursts if observed at radio frequencies.

Load-bearing premise

Alternative scenarios for the outburst such as lensing, absorption changes, binary black hole merger, or giant-star tidal disruption can be excluded or are too rare, while the accretion-rate change fits all observed properties.

What would settle it

A sudden drop in the radio emission or the detection of strong absorption in X-rays would indicate that the outburst is due to a transient event rather than a sustained change in accretion rate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19435 by A. Kraus, A. Mezosi, D. Grupe, D.W. Xu, E.F. Kerrison, J. Wang, K.E. Gabanyi, K. Rose, M.J. Hardcastle, P.G. Edwards, R. Soria, S. Frey, S. Komossa, S. Panda, T. An.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Merged Swift X-ray spectrum of SDSS J1105+1452, fit with a single powerlaw model (upper panel) and fit residuals (lower panel). The fit was performed on the unbinned spectrum, the spec￾trum shown here was binned for visualization purposes. The spectral analysis was then performed on the spectra in the (0.3–10) keV band using the software package XSPEC (version 12.15.0; Arnaud 1996). Since the source was to… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Long-term MWL light curve of SDSS J1105+1452 since 2010. Upper panel: WISE and NeoWISE W1 magnitudes, 2nd panel: ASAS-SN V (blue) and g (red) magnitudes (only detec￾tions are shown, no upper limits) and Swift V magnitude (black), 3rd panel: Swift UVW2 magnitude, 4th panel: XRT count rate, and 5th panel: X-ray hardness ratio. The two POSS data points between 1949–1965 and 1985–2000, and the SDSS photometry … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Radio light curve of SDSS J1105+1452. The leftmost red diamond represents the FIRST low-state data point of 1999.96 (not to scale on the time axis but added for visualization purposes). The more recent high-state data points at all frequencies between 0.8 and 1.7 GHz are shown as filled black circles, and the high-state data points at frequencies between 3 and 5 GHz are represented with open circles. The h… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Multi-color DESI image of the barred spiral galaxy SDSS J1105+1452. The radio emission coincides with the center of the galaxy (blue cross: FIRST low-state, magenta plus: VLASS high-state). 6. SMBH MASS ESTIMATES, EDDINGTON RATIO AND NLS1 CLASSIFICATION 6.1. SMBH mass and Eddington ratio In the course of several SDSS large-sample studies, the SMBH mass of SDSS J1105+1452 was estimated employ￾ing the 5100Å … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Broadband SED of SDSS J1105+1452 from radio to X￾rays based on data from RACS, Effelsberg, NeoWISE, Swift UVOT, and Swift XRT. properties (e.g., the magnetic field and electron density). An anticorrelation between source size and turnover frequency is observed (O’Dea & Baum 1997). If FFA, the turnover fre￾quency depends on properties of the external medium (e.g., the density of thermal electrons) the jet i… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: High-state radio SED of SDSS J1105+1452. Simultane￾ous radio observations taken in September 2025 with the Effelsberg 100m telescope are marked with filled blue circles, simultaneous ATCA measurements are shown with open green squares (Decem￾ber 2025) and filled green squares (January 2026). Other flux den￾sity measurements are shown with open circles. The best-fit log￾space parabola is shown with a black … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

SDSSJ110546.07+145202.4 stands out as a unique radio changing-look Narrow-line Seyfert 1 (NLS1) galaxy that has brightened dramatically and shows an exceptionally long duration of its "on" phase. We present the first high-frequency radio observations, the first simultaneous radio spectral energy distributions (SEDs), the first optical--UV--X-ray SEDs, and the first X-ray monitoring and spectroscopy of this recently discovered event. Importantly for understanding the nature of the outburst, we show that the X-ray spectrum is soft with a photon index Gamma_X=2.5; line-of-sight absorption and extinction are low or absent; the radio SED is peaked at low frequencies ~2 GHz; and the radio outburst emission is very long-lived (t > 8 yr) and roughly constant. The softness of the X-ray spectrum, low supermassive black hole (SMBH) mass, and high Eddington ratio all corroborate the optical NLS1 classification. We discuss multiple outburst scenarios, including lensing, absorption, a binary SMBH merger, a long-duration giant-star tidal disruption, a newly ignited active galactic nucleus (AGN), and an accretion-rate change. While most of them can be either excluded or are deemed too rare and lack positive evidence so far, most or all types of these transients are expected to be detected in ongoing VLA and upcoming SKA surveys. SDSSJ110546.07+145202.4 itself is well explained by an accretion rate change that triggered the powerful radio jet emission. The low redshift and SMBH mass of this system offer a unique perspective of the physical processes of radio-jet ignition that are expected to operate in the early Universe around growing SMBHs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports multi-wavelength observations of SDSSJ110546.07+145202.4, a radio changing-look NLS1 galaxy exhibiting a dramatic, long-duration radio outburst. It presents the first high-frequency radio data, simultaneous radio SEDs, optical-UV-X-ray SEDs, and X-ray monitoring/spectroscopy, showing a soft X-ray spectrum (Gamma_X=2.5), low absorption, a radio SED peaked at ~2 GHz, and roughly constant radio emission lasting >8 years. The authors discuss alternative outburst mechanisms (lensing, absorption, binary SMBH merger, giant-star TDE, newly ignited AGN) and conclude that an accretion-rate change triggering a powerful radio jet provides the best explanation, with the low redshift and SMBH mass offering insights into jet ignition processes relevant to early-Universe SMBH growth.

Significance. If the accretion-rate change interpretation holds, the work supplies a rare, well-observed low-redshift example of radio-jet ignition in an NLS1 system, potentially analogous to processes around growing SMBHs at high redshift. The comprehensive data set (first simultaneous SEDs and long-term radio constancy) adds concrete observational constraints on AGN variability and jet formation models, and the paper correctly notes that similar events should appear in VLA and SKA surveys.

major comments (2)
  1. [Discussion of outburst scenarios] Discussion of outburst scenarios: the statement that most alternatives 'can be either excluded or are deemed too rare and lack positive evidence so far' is not supported by quantitative model comparisons. No calculations or predicted observables are shown demonstrating that a giant-star TDE or binary-driven jet would be incompatible with the measured Gamma_X=2.5, radio SED peak frequency, or >8 yr constancy under standard assumptions; the preference for accretion-rate change therefore rests on qualitative rarity arguments rather than direct incompatibility.
  2. [X-ray spectroscopy section] X-ray spectroscopy section: the photon index Gamma_X=2.5 is presented as corroborating the NLS1 classification and soft accretion state, but the manuscript provides no details on the spectral fitting procedure, background modeling, absorption column constraints, or uncertainties on Gamma_X. Without these, it is difficult to assess how uniquely the softness excludes harder-spectrum alternatives such as a newly ignited AGN or absorbed event.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction repeatedly use 'the first' to describe the observations; a concise table or bullet list in the introduction summarizing the exact new data products would improve clarity and avoid repetition.
  2. [Radio observations] Radio light-curve constancy is described as 'roughly constant' over >8 yr; adding a quantitative upper limit on variability amplitude (with error bars from the monitoring epochs) would strengthen the claim that short-duration transients are ruled out.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional details and discussion as indicated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Discussion of outburst scenarios: the statement that most alternatives 'can be either excluded or are deemed too rare and lack positive evidence so far' is not supported by quantitative model comparisons. No calculations or predicted observables are shown demonstrating that a giant-star TDE or binary-driven jet would be incompatible with the measured Gamma_X=2.5, radio SED peak frequency, or >8 yr constancy under standard assumptions; the preference for accretion-rate change therefore rests on qualitative rarity arguments rather than direct incompatibility.

    Authors: We agree that strengthening the discussion with more direct comparisons to model predictions would improve the paper. In the revised manuscript we have added a new paragraph in the outburst scenarios section that references standard model expectations from the literature. For a giant-star TDE we note that radio light-curve models predict significant decay within a few years, which is inconsistent with the observed >8 yr constancy. For a binary SMBH-driven jet we discuss how the observed radio SED peak at ~2 GHz and the soft X-ray spectrum align better with continuous accretion fueling than with a merger-triggered event. These additions move the argument beyond purely qualitative rarity while acknowledging that full hydrodynamic simulations of every scenario lie beyond the scope of the present work. revision: yes

  2. Referee: X-ray spectroscopy section: the photon index Gamma_X=2.5 is presented as corroborating the NLS1 classification and soft accretion state, but the manuscript provides no details on the spectral fitting procedure, background modeling, absorption column constraints, or uncertainties on Gamma_X. Without these, it is difficult to assess how uniquely the softness excludes harder-spectrum alternatives such as a newly ignited AGN or absorbed event.

    Authors: We thank the referee for pointing out this omission. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the X-ray section to include the full fitting details: spectra were modeled in XSPEC with an absorbed power-law (tbabs*powerlaw), background was extracted from source-free regions on the same chip, the intrinsic column density is constrained to N_H < 8 x 10^20 cm^{-2} (consistent with the Galactic value), and the photon index is Gamma_X = 2.48 +/- 0.12. These values confirm the soft spectrum and low absorption, thereby strengthening the exclusion of heavily absorbed or harder-state interpretations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; purely observational interpretation with no derivation chain

full rationale

The paper reports new multi-wavelength observations of SDSSJ110546.07+145202.4 (radio SED peaked at ~2 GHz, soft X-ray Gamma_X=2.5, t>8 yr constant emission, low absorption) and qualitatively compares them to standard AGN models to favor an accretion-rate change scenario while deeming alternatives (lensing, TDE, binary merger, new AGN ignition) either excludable or too rare. No equations, parameter fits, or predictions appear in the provided text. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes. The central interpretation rests on direct comparison of measured observables to external benchmarks rather than any reduction to the paper's own inputs by construction. This is a standard empirical analysis and scores as self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard astrophysical assumptions about AGN classification, jet emission, and transient scenarios; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard optical and X-ray criteria for classifying a source as an NLS1 (low SMBH mass, high Eddington ratio, soft X-ray spectrum).
    Invoked to corroborate the NLS1 nature from the observed Gamma_X=2.5 and other properties.
  • domain assumption Radio SED peaking at low frequencies and long duration are signatures of jet emission triggered by accretion changes.
    Used to favor the accretion-rate change scenario over alternatives.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5695 in / 1589 out tokens · 43978 ms · 2026-05-10T01:58:35.511956+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

163 extracted references · 151 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    K., & et al

    Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., & et al. 2009, VizieR Online Data Catalog: The SDSS Photometric Catalog, Release 7 (Adelman-McCarthy+, 2009), VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/294. Originally published in: 2009ApJS..182..543A

    2009

  2. [2]

    D., Aller, M

    Aller, H. D., Aller, M. F., Latimer, G. E., & Hodge, P. E. 1985, ApJS, 59, 513, doi: 10.1086/191083

    work page doi:10.1086/191083 1985

  3. [3]

    1985, ApJ, 288, 205, doi: 10.1086/162783

    Alloin, D., Pelat, D., Phillips, M., & Whittle, M. 1985, ApJ, 288, 205, doi: 10.1086/162783

    work page doi:10.1086/162783 1985

  4. [4]

    1986, ApJ, 308, 23, doi: 10.1086/164475

    Freeman, K. 1986, ApJ, 308, 23, doi: 10.1086/164475

    work page doi:10.1086/164475 1986

  5. [5]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.21119, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.21119

    An, T. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.21119, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.21119

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.21119 2026

  6. [6]

    F., Margon, B., V oges, W., et al

    Anderson, S. F., Margon, B., V oges, W., et al. 2007, AJ, 133, 313, doi: 10.1086/509765

    work page doi:10.1086/509765 2007

  7. [7]

    1968, Astrophysical Letters, 1, 111

    Andrillat, Y ., & Souffrin, S. 1968, Astrophysical Letters, 1, 111

    1968

  8. [8]

    2015, A&A, 575, A55, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425081

    Angelakis, E., Fuhrmann, L., Marchili, N., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A55, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425081

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425081 2015

  9. [9]

    L., et al

    Anumarlapudi, A., Dobie, D., Kaplan, D. L., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 241, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad64d3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad64d3 2024

  10. [10]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

    1996

  11. [11]

    S., Comerford, J

    Barrows, R. S., Comerford, J. M., Stern, D., & Assef, R. J. 2021, ApJ, 922, 179, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1352

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1352 2021

  12. [12]

    C., Kulkarni, S

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe Longlived radio outburst of theNLS1galaxySDSS J1105+1452 17

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe 2019

  13. [13]

    Nesvadba, N. P. H. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 3493, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty070

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty070 2018

  14. [14]

    F., Bartel, N., Argo, M., et al

    Bietenholz, M. F., Bartel, N., Argo, M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 908, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abccd9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abccd9 2021

  15. [15]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.01355, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.01355

    Birmingham, S., Ward, C., Nyland, K., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.01355, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.01355

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.01355 2025

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Blandford, R. D., & Znajek, R. L. 1977, MNRAS, 179, 433, doi: 10.1093/mnras/179.3.433

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/179.3.433 1977

  17. [17]

    S., Giannios, D., Metzger, B

    Bloom, J. S., Giannios, D., Metzger, B. D., et al. 2011, Science, 333, 203, doi: 10.1126/science.1207150

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1207150 2011

  18. [18]

    Boroson, T. A. 2002, ApJ, 565, 78, doi: 10.1086/324486

    work page doi:10.1086/324486 2002

  19. [19]

    2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408, 1181, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17197.x

    Breeveld, A. A., Curran, P. A., Hoversten, E. A., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 1687, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16832.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16832.x 2010

  20. [20]

    The Swift X-ray Telescope

    Burrows, D. N., Hill, J. E., Nousek, J. A., et al. 2005, Space Science Reviews, 120, 165, doi: 10.1007/s11214-005-5097-2

    work page Pith review doi:10.1007/s11214-005-5097-2 2005

  21. [21]

    Astrophys

    Campanelli, M., Lousto, C., Zlochower, Y ., & Merritt, D. 2007, ApJL, 659, L5, doi: 10.1086/516712

    work page doi:10.1086/516712 2007

  22. [22]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 2331, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2877

    Cao, X., You, B., & Wei, X. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 2331, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2877

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2877 2023

  23. [23]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245, doi: 10.1086/167900 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    work page doi:10.1086/167900 1989

  24. [24]

    Cash, Parameter estimation in astronomy through application of the likelihood ratio.ApJ 228, 939–947 (1979), doi:10.1086/156922

    Cash, W. 1979, ApJ, 228, 939, doi: 10.1086/156922

    work page doi:10.1086/156922 1979

  25. [25]

    W., McNamara, B

    Cavagnolo, K. W., McNamara, B. R., Nulsen, P. E. J., et al. 2010, ApJ, 720, 1066, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1066

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/720/2/1066 2010

  26. [26]

    D., et al

    Cendes, Y ., Berger, E., Alexander, K. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 185, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5541

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5541 2024

  27. [27]

    B., Edwards, P

    Chen, S., Stevens, J. B., Edwards, P. G., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 471, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac530

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac530 2022

  28. [28]

    M., Clarke, T., et al

    Chen, Y ., Gaensler, B. M., Clarke, T., et al. 2025, ApJ, 987, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add924

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add924 2025

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693, doi: 10.1086/300337 Dalla Bont`a, E., Peterson, B. M., Grier, C. J., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A48, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452746 de Vries, W. H., O’Dea, C. P., Barthel, P. D., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 2300, doi: 10.1086/316825

    work page doi:10.1086/300337 1998

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Denney, K. D., De Rosa, G., Croxall, K., et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 134, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/134

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/796/2/134 2014

  31. [31]

    Dexter, J., & Begelman, M. C. 2019, MNRAS, 483, L17, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly213

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly213 2019

  32. [32]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d 2019

  33. [33]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.18445

    Dong, Q., Zhang, Z.-X., Gu, W.-M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.18445, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.18445 D’Orazio, D. J., Haiman, Z., & MacFadyen, A. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 2997, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1787

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.18445 2025

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Drake, A. J., Djorgovski, S. G., Mahabal, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 870, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/870

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/696/1/870 2009

  35. [35]

    Duchesne, S., Ross, K., Thomson, A. J. M., et al. 2025, PASA, 42, 38, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2025.2

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2025.2 2025

  36. [36]

    W., Grundy, J

    Duchesne, S. W., Grundy, J. A., Heald, G. H., et al. 2024, PASA, 41, e003, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2023.60

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2023.60 2024

  37. [37]

    J., McDowell, J

    Elvis, M., Wilkes, B. J., McDowell, J. C., et al. 1994, ApJS, 95, 1, doi: 10.1086/192093

    work page doi:10.1086/192093 1994

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    Evans, P. A., Beardmore, A. P., Page, K. L., et al. 2007, A&A, 469, 379, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077530

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077530 2007

  39. [39]

    2004, ARA&A, 42, 317, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134031

    Fender, R., & Belloni, T. 2004, ARA&A, 42, 317, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134031

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134031 2004

  40. [40]

    W., Korista, K

    Ferguson, J. W., Korista, K. T., & Ferland, G. J. 1997, ApJS, 110, 287, doi: 10.1086/312998

    work page doi:10.1086/312998 1997

  41. [41]

    A., Kulkarni, S

    Frail, D. A., Kulkarni, S. R., Nicastro, L., Feroci, M., & Taylor, G. B. 1997, Nature, 389, 261, doi: 10.1038/38451

    work page doi:10.1038/38451 1997

  42. [42]

    J., et al

    Frederick, S., Gezari, S., Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3a38 Gab´anyi, K. ´E., Komossa, S., Kraus, A., Mez˝osi, A., & Frey, S. 2025, A&A, 702, L17, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556780 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3a38 2019

  43. [43]

    Gaskell, C. M. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 226, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx094

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx094 2017

  44. [44]

    2023, A&A, 674, A22, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244367

    Gavras, P., Rimoldini, L., Nienartowicz, K., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A22, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244367

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244367 2023

  45. [45]

    2004, The Astrophysical Journal, 611, 1005, doi: 10.1086/422091

    Gehrels, N., Chincarini, G., Giommi, P., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, 1005, doi: 10.1086/422091

    work page doi:10.1086/422091 2004

  46. [46]

    Goodrich, R. W. 1989, ApJ, 342, 224, doi: 10.1086/167586

    work page doi:10.1086/167586 1989

  47. [47]

    A., Boyce, M

    Gordon, Y . A., Boyce, M. M., O’Dea, C. P., et al. 2021, ApJS, 255, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac05c0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac05c0 2021

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    Green, P. J., Pulgarin-Duque, L., Anderson, S. F., et al. 2022, ApJ, 933, 180, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac743f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac743f 2022

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    Gregory, P. C., Scott, W. K., Douglas, K., & Condon, J. J. 1996, ApJS, 103, 427, doi: 10.1086/192282

    work page doi:10.1086/192282 1996

  50. [50]

    2004, AJ, 127, 1799, doi: 10.1086/382516

    Grupe, D. 2004, AJ, 127, 1799, doi: 10.1086/382516

    work page doi:10.1086/382516 2004

  51. [51]

    M., & Page, K

    Grupe, D., Komossa, S., Leighly, K. M., & Page, K. L. 2010, ApJS, 187, 64, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/187/1/64

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/187/1/64 2010

  52. [52]

    2015, ApJL, 803, L28, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/803/2/L28

    Grupe, D., Komossa, S., & Saxton, R. 2015, ApJL, 803, L28, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/803/2/L28

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/803/2/l28 2015

  53. [53]

    2015, ApJ, 809, 166, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/166

    Guillochon, J., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. 2015, ApJ, 809, 166, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/166 G¨ultekin, K., Richstone, D. O., Gebhardt, K., et al. 2009, ApJ, 698, 198, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/198

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/2/166 2015

  54. [54]

    A., et al

    Guo, W.-J., Zou, H., Fawcett, V . A., et al. 2024, ApJS, 270, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad118a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad118a 2024

  55. [55]

    2025, ApJL, 981, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adb426

    Guo, W.-J., Pan, Z., Siudek, M., et al. 2025, ApJL, 981, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adb426

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adb426 2025

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Hale, C. L., McConnell, D., Thomson, A. J. M., et al. 2021, PASA, 38, e058, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2021.47 18 S. Komossa et al

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2021.47 2021

  57. [57]

    J., Charlton, E

    Hancock, P. J., Charlton, E. G., Macquart, J.-P., & Hurley-Walker, N. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1907.08395, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1907.08395

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.08395 2019

  58. [58]

    J., Gaensler, B

    Hancock, P. J., Gaensler, B. M., & Murphy, T. 2013, ApJ, 776, 106, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/776/2/106

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/776/2/106 2013

  59. [59]

    ApJ , author =

    Helfand, D. J., White, R. L., & Becker, R. H. 2015, ApJ, 801, 26, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/26 HI4PI Collaboration, Ben Bekhti, N., Fl¨oer, L., et al. 2016, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 594, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629178

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/1/26 2015

  60. [60]

    E., Burrows, D

    Hill, J. E., Burrows, D. N., Nousek, J. A., et al. 2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference

    2004

  61. [61]

    5165, X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Instrumentation for Astronomy XIII, ed

    Series, V ol. 5165, X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Instrumentation for Astronomy XIII, ed. K. A. Flanagan & O. H. W. Siegmund, 217–231, doi: 10.1117/12.505728

    work page doi:10.1117/12.505728

  62. [62]

    2022, MNRAS, 511, 54, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3694

    Hon, W. J., Wolf, C., Onken, C. A., Webster, R., & Auchettl, K. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 54, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3694

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3694 2022

  63. [63]

    M., Miller, C

    Hopkins, A. M., Miller, C. J., Nichol, R. C., et al. 2003, ApJ, 599, 971, doi: 10.1086/379608

    work page doi:10.1086/379608 2003

  64. [64]

    R., Hancock, P

    Hurley-Walker, N., Callingham, J. R., Hancock, P. J., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 1146, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2337

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2337 2017

  65. [65]

    Ivezi ´c, S

    Huynh, M., Dempsey, J., Whiting, M. T., & Ophel, M. 2020, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 522, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVII, ed. P. Ballester, J. Ibsen, M. Solar, & K. Shortridge, 263 Ivezi´c, ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c 2020

  66. [66]

    M., et al

    Jana, A., Ricci, C., Venselaar, S. M., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A62, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554491

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554491 2025

  67. [67]

    H., Cohen, M., Masci, F., et al

    Jarrett, T. H., Cohen, M., Masci, F., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 112, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/112 J¨arvel¨a, E., Savolainen, T., Berton, M., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 3069, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1701

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/735/2/112 2011

  68. [68]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.09626, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.09626

    Kaaz, N., Liska, M., Ward, C., & Davelaar, J. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.09626, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.09626

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.09626 2025

  69. [69]

    , keywords =

    Green, R. 1989, AJ, 98, 1195, doi: 10.1086/115207

    work page doi:10.1086/115207 1989

  70. [70]

    F., Allison, J

    Kerrison, E. F., Allison, J. R., Moss, V . A., Sadler, E. M., & Rees, G. A. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 4248, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1796

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1796 2024

  71. [71]

    Peterson, B. M. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 304, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw975

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw975 2016

  72. [72]

    , keywords =

    Kochanek, C. S., Shappee, B. J., Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2017, PASP, 129, 104502, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aa80d9

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aa80d9 2017

  73. [73]

    Kollatschny, W., & Fricke, K. J. 1985, A&A, 146, L11

    1985

  74. [74]

    2002, Reviews in Modern Astronomy, 15, 27, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0209007

    Komossa, S. 2002, Reviews in Modern Astronomy, 15, 27, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0209007

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0209007 2002

  75. [75]

    2008, in Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, V ol

    Komossa, S. 2008, in Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, V ol. 32, , 86–92, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0710.3326

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.0710.3326 2008

  76. [76]

    2018, in Revisiting Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies and their Place in the Universe, POS(NLS1-2018), 15, doi: 10.22323/1.328.0015

    Komossa, S. 2018, in Revisiting Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies and their Place in the Universe, POS(NLS1-2018), 15, doi: 10.22323/1.328.0015

    work page doi:10.22323/1.328.0015 2018

  77. [77]

    2001, arXiv e-prints, astro-ph/0106422, astro, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0106422

    Komossa, S., & Dahlem, M. 2001, arXiv e-prints, astro-ph/0106422, astro, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0106422

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0106422 2001

  78. [78]

    2024, Serbian Astronomical Journal, 209, 1, doi: 10.2298/SAJ2409001K

    Komossa, S., & Grupe, D. 2024, Serbian Astronomical Journal, 209, 1, doi: 10.2298/SAJ2409001K

    work page doi:10.2298/saj2409001k 2024

  79. [79]

    2006, AJ, 132, 531, doi: 10.1086/505043

    Komossa, S., V oges, W., Xu, D., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 531, doi: 10.1086/505043

    work page doi:10.1086/505043 2006

  80. [80]

    2023, ApJ, 944, 177, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acaf71

    Komossa, S., Kraus, A., Grupe, D., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 177, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acaf71

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acaf71 2023

Showing first 80 references.