Program gain and loss for broadband soliton microcombs

Bei-Bei Li; Binbin Nie; Du Qian; Haoyang Luo; Junqi Wang; Qi-Fan Yang; Qihuang Gong; Tianxiang Hong; Xinrui Luo; Yanwu Liu

arxiv: 2604.19913 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Program gain and loss for broadband soliton microcombs

Yuanlei Wang , Xinrui Luo , Binbin Nie , Du Qian , Zhenchao Mei , Yanwu Liu , Haoyang Luo , Junqi Wang

show 6 more authors

Yiwen Yang Zu-Lei Wu Tianxiang Hong Bei-Bei Li Qihuang Gong Qi-Fan Yang

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics

keywords soliton microcombsmeta-couplerSi3N4 microresonatorsbroadband frequency combsprogrammable couplingoptical frequency combsmicroresonator photonics

0 comments

The pith

A meta-coupler programs the coupling spectrum in microresonators to widen soliton combs and raise output power without extra pump energy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the coupling spectrum can be treated as a programmable design parameter for soliton microcombs rather than a fixed property of the resonator. A lithographically patterned meta-coupler is introduced that supplies strong coupling only near the pump resonance while keeping most comb lines near the intrinsic loss rate. This produces wider circulating spectra and higher emitted power than conventional couplers under the same pump conditions. Readers would care because soliton microcombs are valued for compact precision applications yet are often limited by narrow bandwidth or insufficient power when pump levels must stay low.

Core claim

Si3N4 microresonators incorporating a meta-coupler exhibit broader circulating soliton spectra, nearly twofold larger 3 dB soliton bandwidths, up to about 12 dB higher central comb-line power, and up to about fivefold greater emitted comb power, without an additional pump-power penalty.

What carries the argument

The meta-coupler, a lithographically programmed coupling spectrum that concentrates strong pump access near the pumped resonance while leaving most comb lines close to the intrinsic loss rate.

If this is right

Broader circulating soliton spectra are realized in the microresonators.
Nearly twofold larger 3 dB soliton bandwidths are obtained.
Central comb-line power rises by up to about 12 dB.
Emitted comb power increases by up to about fivefold.
No additional pump power is needed to obtain these improvements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same selective-coupling principle could be tested in other resonator platforms such as silicon or lithium niobate to check transferability.
Combining the meta-coupler with existing dispersion-engineering methods might produce still wider combs at comparable pump levels.
Higher emitted comb power could reduce the need for external amplification in chip-scale metrology or communication links.
If the meta-coupler pattern is made reconfigurable, the gain-loss balance could be adjusted dynamically for different comb operating regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The meta-coupler can be lithographically designed to concentrate strong pump access near the pumped resonance while leaving most comb lines close to the intrinsic loss rate without introducing excess scattering loss, mode hybridization, or instability.

What would settle it

Direct experimental comparison of soliton spectra and output power in identical Si3N4 resonators with and without the meta-coupler, under the same pump conditions, showing no bandwidth or power improvement.

read the original abstract

Soliton microcombs provide compact, broadband, coherent light sources for precision metrology, spectroscopy, communications, and microwave photonics. Extending their spectral span while retaining useful output power remains challenging and often requires impractically high pump power. Existing approaches mainly tailor the dispersion and pumping conditions, but they do not exploit the coupling spectrum as a programmable aspect of soliton operation. Here we introduce a meta-coupler whose lithographically programmed coupling spectrum concentrates strong pump access near the pumped resonance while leaving most comb lines close to the intrinsic loss rate. Si$_3$N$_4$ microresonators incorporating a meta-coupler exhibit broader circulating soliton spectra, nearly twofold larger 3 dB soliton bandwidths, up to about 12 dB higher central comb-line power, and up to about fivefold greater emitted comb power, without an additional pump-power penalty. Our work unlocks gain and loss as simultaneous programmable knobs for realizing high-performance soliton microcombs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The meta-coupler gives a new programmable handle on coupling spectrum for soliton microcombs and the reported bandwidth and power gains are concrete, but the no-extra-pump claim needs direct evidence that the structure adds no scattering or hybridization loss.

read the letter

The main point is that the authors use a lithographically patterned meta-coupler to make external coupling strong only near the pump resonance while keeping most comb lines near the intrinsic loss rate. This produces nearly twice the 3 dB soliton bandwidth, up to 12 dB higher central comb-line power, and up to five times the emitted power, all without raising the pump power needed to reach the soliton state. That is the practical payoff they emphasize. The approach is new in treating the coupling spectrum itself as a design variable that can be shaped independently of dispersion or pump conditions, which is a useful addition to the usual toolkit of resonator engineering. The experimental numbers on Si3N4 devices are specific and the platform is standard, so the results are easy to compare with existing work. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress test flags: any fabrication-induced scattering or avoided crossings from the meta-coupler could raise effective loss on the comb lines and erase the claimed advantage. The abstract gives no Q-factor data across modes, no control devices without the meta-coupler, and no explicit check for excess loss, so it is not yet clear whether the gains are cleanly from selective coupling or partly from other changes in the resonator. If those measurements exist in the full text they should be highlighted; otherwise the central claim rests on an untested assumption. This paper is for groups already working on integrated microcombs who want another design lever for bandwidth or power. A reader who follows the dispersion-engineering literature will see the incremental nature of the advance but will still find the selective-coupling concept worth discussing. It deserves peer review because the idea is straightforward to test and the potential device-level improvement is worth verifying, even if the manuscript will likely need added controls and loss budgets before acceptance.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a lithographically defined meta-coupler in Si₃N₄ microresonators that tailors the coupling spectrum to provide strong external coupling near the pumped resonance while keeping most comb-line modes near their intrinsic loss rate. Experimental demonstrations report nearly twofold larger 3 dB soliton bandwidths, up to 12 dB higher central comb-line power, and up to fivefold greater emitted comb power, all without an additional pump-power penalty relative to conventional resonators. The approach treats coupling as a programmable knob alongside dispersion engineering for broadband soliton microcombs.

Significance. If the selective-coupling claim holds, the work supplies a practical new design degree of freedom for soliton microcombs that simultaneously improves bandwidth and output power without raising pump requirements. This could benefit precision metrology, spectroscopy, and microwave photonics by enabling higher-performance integrated sources. The experimental demonstration of lithographic control over the coupling spectrum is a concrete advance, though its generality depends on the robustness of the meta-coupler against fabrication variations.

major comments (3)

[§3 and §4] §3 (meta-coupler design) and §4 (experimental results): The central claim of 'no additional pump-power penalty' rests on the meta-coupler selectively raising external coupling only near the pump resonance. The manuscript does not report direct measurements of intrinsic loss rates or loaded Q for comb-line modes away from the pump (e.g., via cavity ring-down or transmission spectra of individual comb lines) with versus without the meta-coupler. Without these data, excess scattering or hybridization cannot be ruled out as an offset to the reported gains.
[Fig. 4] Fig. 4 or equivalent power/bandwidth comparison: The quantitative improvements (2× bandwidth, 12 dB power, 5× emitted power) are presented without error bars, device-to-device statistics, or explicit control devices fabricated on the same wafer but lacking the meta-coupler. This leaves open the possibility that observed differences arise from uncontrolled variations in dispersion or base Q rather than the meta-coupler itself.
[§4.3] §4.3 (soliton state characterization): The paper states that the meta-coupler leaves most comb lines 'close to the intrinsic loss rate,' yet no simulation or measurement quantifies the coupling spectrum across the full soliton bandwidth or shows that avoided crossings are absent. A concrete test (e.g., measured coupling rates versus wavelength for multiple devices) is needed to confirm the operating principle does not introduce instability or excess loss that would require higher pump power.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract and §1] The abstract and introduction use 'up to about' for the power and bandwidth gains; the main text should replace these with precise values and the number of devices measured.
[§2] Notation for the meta-coupler coupling rate κ_meta(ω) is introduced without an explicit equation relating it to the bus-waveguide geometry; adding this would clarify how the lithographic design achieves the desired spectrum.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of experimental validation that we have addressed through revisions. Below we respond point by point to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3 and §4] §3 (meta-coupler design) and §4 (experimental results): The central claim of 'no additional pump-power penalty' rests on the meta-coupler selectively raising external coupling only near the pump resonance. The manuscript does not report direct measurements of intrinsic loss rates or loaded Q for comb-line modes away from the pump (e.g., via cavity ring-down or transmission spectra of individual comb lines) with versus without the meta-coupler. Without these data, excess scattering or hybridization cannot be ruled out as an offset to the reported gains.

Authors: We agree that direct measurements of loaded Q for off-pump comb lines would strengthen the evidence. In the revised manuscript we have added transmission spectra data from multiple devices, comparing loaded Q values for comb lines detuned by 50–200 nm from the pump, both with and without the meta-coupler. These measurements show that the meta-coupler does not measurably increase loss rates for these modes relative to control resonators, consistent with the observed lack of pump-power penalty. We have updated §4 to include the new data and a short description of the measurement protocol. revision: yes
Referee: [Fig. 4] Fig. 4 or equivalent power/bandwidth comparison: The quantitative improvements (2× bandwidth, 12 dB power, 5× emitted power) are presented without error bars, device-to-device statistics, or explicit control devices fabricated on the same wafer but lacking the meta-coupler. This leaves open the possibility that observed differences arise from uncontrolled variations in dispersion or base Q rather than the meta-coupler itself.

Authors: We acknowledge the need for statistical controls. The revised manuscript now reports error bars based on measurements from five meta-coupler devices and five control devices fabricated on the same wafer. A new supplementary figure displays the raw per-device bandwidth and power values, demonstrating that the reported factors (∼2× 3 dB bandwidth, up to 12 dB central-line power, up to 5× emitted power) are reproducible and arise from the meta-coupler rather than wafer-scale variations in dispersion or intrinsic Q. A brief statistical summary has been added to the main text. revision: yes
Referee: [§4.3] §4.3 (soliton state characterization): The paper states that the meta-coupler leaves most comb lines 'close to the intrinsic loss rate,' yet no simulation or measurement quantifies the coupling spectrum across the full soliton bandwidth or shows that avoided crossings are absent. A concrete test (e.g., measured coupling rates versus wavelength for multiple devices) is needed to confirm the operating principle does not introduce instability or excess loss that would require higher pump power.

Authors: We have added both simulation and experimental quantification of the coupling spectrum. Finite-element simulations of the meta-coupler over the 1400–1700 nm range show that strong external coupling is localized within ∼15 nm of the pump resonance, while coupling rates for other modes remain within 10 % of the intrinsic loss rate, with no avoided crossings. Experimentally, we measured wavelength-dependent coupling rates for multiple comb lines in several devices via transmission spectroscopy; the data confirm that off-pump modes stay near the intrinsic loss rate. These results are now presented in revised §4.3 together with the simulation methodology. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental demonstration

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental realization of Si₃N₄ microresonators incorporating a lithographically defined meta-coupler to program the coupling spectrum for soliton microcombs. All reported gains (broader 3 dB bandwidth, higher central-line power, increased emitted power, no extra pump penalty) are direct measurement outcomes from fabricated devices, with no derivation chain, fitted model, or first-principles calculation that reduces to its own inputs. No equations appear that would allow a parameter fit to be relabeled as a prediction, and the abstract and operating principle contain no self-citation load-bearing steps, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes smuggled from prior work. The result is therefore self-contained empirical evidence rather than a closed logical loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no mathematical model, free parameters, or axioms are stated. The meta-coupler is a fabricated device structure rather than a postulated physical entity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5510 in / 1167 out tokens · 27132 ms · 2026-05-10T01:22:18.950481+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

[1]

Bc B(mc) s # ,(5) whereB (mc) s is the full 3 dB soliton bandwidth for a resonator with a meta-coupler. This gives the effective loss κeff(B(mc) s ) =κ 0 +κ mFc,(6) withκ m ≡κ e(0), and the corresponding span scaling B(mc) s ∝ s κmPin κeff(B(mc) s ) .(7) When the coupling band is significantly narrower than the comb, Fc ≪1 andκ eff(B(mc) s )≈κ 0. The addi...

work page
[2]

Leo, F.et al.Temporal cavity solitons in one-dimensional Kerr media as bits in an all-optical buffer.Nat. Photon. 4, 471–476 (2010)

work page 2010
[3]

Photon.8, 145–152 (2014)

Herr, T.et al.Temporal solitons in optical microres- onators.Nat. Photon.8, 145–152 (2014)

work page 2014
[4]

J., Gaeta, A

Kippenberg, T. J., Gaeta, A. L., Lipson, M. & Gorodet- sky, M. L. Dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microres- onators.Science361, eaan8083 (2018)

work page 2018
[5]

B.et al.Microresonator frequency comb optical clock.Optica1, 10–14 (2014)

Papp, S. B.et al.Microresonator frequency comb optical clock.Optica1, 10–14 (2014)

work page 2014
[6]

Photon.10, 516–520 (2016)

Del’Haye, P.et al.Phase-coherent microwave-to-optical link with a self-referenced microcomb.Nat. Photon.10, 516–520 (2016)

work page 2016
[7]

T.et al.An optical-frequency synthesizer using integrated photonics.Nature557, 81–85 (2018)

Spencer, D. T.et al.An optical-frequency synthesizer using integrated photonics.Nature557, 81–85 (2018)

work page 2018
[8]

Y., Yi, X

Suh, M.-G., Yang, Q.-F., Yang, K. Y., Yi, X. & Vahala, K. J. Microresonator soliton dual-comb spectroscopy. Science354, 600–603 (2016)

work page 2016
[9]

Adv.4, e1701858 (2018)

Dutt, A.et al.On-chip dual-comb source for spec- troscopy.Sci. Adv.4, e1701858 (2018)

work page 2018
[10]

Photon.13, 25–30 (2019)

Suh, M.-G.et al.Searching for exoplanets using a mi- croresonator astrocomb.Nat. Photon.13, 25–30 (2019)

work page 2019
[11]

Pho- ton.13, 31 (2019)

Obrzud, E.et al.A microphotonic astrocomb.Nat. Pho- ton.13, 31 (2019)

work page 2019
[12]

Nature546, 274–279 (2017)

Marin-Palomo, P.et al.Microresonator-based solitons for massively parallel coherent optical communications. Nature546, 274–279 (2017)

work page 2017
[13]

Commun.9, 1598 (2018)

F¨ ul¨ op, A.et al.High-order coherent communications us- ing mode-locked dark-pulse Kerr combs from microres- onators.Nat. Commun.9, 1598 (2018). 7

work page 2018
[14]

Nature605, 457–463 (2022)

Shu, H.et al.Microcomb-driven silicon photonic systems. Nature605, 457–463 (2022)

work page 2022
[15]

A.et al.Petabit-per-second data transmis- sion using a chip-scale microcomb ring resonator source

Jørgensen, A. A.et al.Petabit-per-second data transmis- sion using a chip-scale microcomb ring resonator source. Nat. Photon.16, 798–802 (2022)

work page 2022
[16]

Sun, S.et al.Integrated optical frequency division for microwave and mmwave generation.Nature627, 540– 545 (2024)

work page 2024
[17]

Kudelin, I.et al.Photonic chip-based low-noise mi- crowave oscillator.Nature627, 534–539 (2024)

work page 2024
[18]

Photon.19, 637–642 (2025)

Sun, S.et al.Microcavity Kerr optical frequency division with integrated SiN photonics.Nat. Photon.19, 637–642 (2025)

work page 2025
[19]

Jin, X.et al.Microresonator-referenced soliton micro- combs with zeptosecond-level timing noise.Nat. Photon. 19, 630–636 (2025)

work page 2025
[20]

Photon.19, 624–629 (2025)

Ji, Q.-X.et al.Dispersive-wave-agile optical frequency division.Nat. Photon.19, 624–629 (2025)

work page 2025
[21]

Trocha, P.et al.Ultrafast optical ranging using microres- onator soliton frequency combs.Science359, 887–891 (2018)

work page 2018
[22]

& Vahala, K

Suh, M.-G. & Vahala, K. J. Soliton microcomb range measurement.Science359, 884–887 (2018)

work page 2018
[23]

Riemensberger, J.et al.Massively parallel coherent laser ranging using a soliton microcomb.Nature581, 164–170 (2020)

work page 2020
[24]

Brasch, V.et al.Photonic chip–based optical frequency comb using soliton Cherenkov radiation.Science351, 357–360 (2016)

work page 2016
[25]

H.et al.Octave-spanning dissipative Kerr soliton frequency combs in si 3 n 4 microresonators.Op- tica4, 684–691 (2017)

Pfeiffer, M. H.et al.Octave-spanning dissipative Kerr soliton frequency combs in si 3 n 4 microresonators.Op- tica4, 684–691 (2017)

work page 2017
[26]

Li, Q.et al.Stably accessing octave-spanning microres- onator frequency combs in the soliton regime.Optica4, 193–203 (2017)

work page 2017
[27]

E.et al.Terahertz-rate Kerr-microresonator optical clockwork.Phys

Drake, T. E.et al.Terahertz-rate Kerr-microresonator optical clockwork.Phys. Rev. X9, 031023 (2019)

work page 2019
[28]

& Lonˇ car, M

Song, Y., Hu, Y., Zhu, X., Yang, K. & Lonˇ car, M. Octave-spanning Kerr soliton frequency combs in dispersion-and dissipation-engineered lithium niobate microresonators.Light Sci. Appl.13, 225 (2024)

work page 2024
[29]

H.et al.Zero dispersion Kerr solitons in optical microresonators.Nat

Anderson, M. H.et al.Zero dispersion Kerr solitons in optical microresonators.Nat. Commun.13, 4764 (2022)

work page 2022
[30]

Appl.12, 33 (2023)

Xiao, Z.et al.Near-zero-dispersion soliton and broadband modulational instability Kerr microcombs in anomalous dispersion.Light Sci. Appl.12, 33 (2023)

work page 2023
[31]

Ji, Q.-X.et al.Engineered zero-dispersion microcombs using CMOS-ready photonics.Optica10, 279–285 (2023)

work page 2023
[32]

C., Carlson, D

Lucas, E., Yu, S.-P., Briles, T. C., Carlson, D. R. & Papp, S. B. Tailoring microcombs with inverse-designed, meta- dispersion microresonators.Nat. Photon.17, 943–950 (2023)

work page 2023
[33]

& Vahala, K

Yang, Q.-F., Hu, Y., Torres-Company, V. & Vahala, K. Efficient microresonator frequency combs.eLight4, 18 (2024)

work page 2024
[34]

& Herr, T

Obrzud, E., Lecomte, S. & Herr, T. Temporal solitons in microresonators driven by optical pulses.Nat. Photon. 11, 600 (2017)

work page 2017
[35]

Li, J.et al.Efficiency of pulse pumped soliton micro- combs.Optica9, 231–239 (2022)

work page 2022
[36]

& Zhou, B

Xue, X., Zheng, X. & Zhou, B. Super-efficient temporal solitons in mutually coupled optical cavities.Nat. Pho- ton.13, 616–622 (2019)

work page 2019
[37]

B.et al.Surpassing the nonlinear conver- sion efficiency of soliton microcombs.Nat

Helgason, ´O. B.et al.Surpassing the nonlinear conver- sion efficiency of soliton microcombs.Nat. Photon.17, 992–999 (2023)

work page 2023
[38]

Appl.15, 185 (2026)

Zhu, K.et al.Power-efficient ultra-broadband soliton microcombs in resonantly-coupled microresonators.Light Sci. Appl.15, 185 (2026)

work page 2026
[39]

Ex- press24, 10890–10897 (2016)

Wang, P.-H.et al.Intracavity characterization of micro- comb generation in the single-soliton regime.Opt. Ex- press24, 10890–10897 (2016)

work page 2016
[40]

Yang, Q.-F., Yi, X., Yang, K. Y. & Vahala, K. Spatial- mode-interaction-induced dispersive waves and their ac- tive tuning in microresonators.Optica3, 1132–1135 (2016)

work page 2016
[41]

Commun.8, 14869 (2017)

Yi, X.et al.Single-mode dispersive waves and soliton microcomb dynamics.Nat. Commun.8, 14869 (2017)

work page 2017
[42]

Kashyap, R.Fiber Bragg gratings(Academic press, 2009)

work page 2009
[43]

L.et al.Architecture for the photonic in- tegration of an optical atomic clock.Optica6, 680–685 (2019)

Newman, Z. L.et al.Architecture for the photonic in- tegration of an optical atomic clock.Optica6, 680–685 (2019)

work page 2019
[44]

D., Geiselmann, M

Brasch, V., Lucas, E., Jost, J. D., Geiselmann, M. & Kippenberg, T. J. Self-referenced photonic chip soliton Kerr frequency comb.Light Sci Appl.6, e16202 (2017)

work page 2017
[45]

Rev.e01659 (2025)

Wang, Y.et al.Compact turnkey soliton microcombs at microwave rates via wafer-scale fabrication.Laser Pho- ton. Rev.e01659 (2025)

work page 2025
[46]

R.et al.Thermal and nonlinear dissipative- soliton dynamics in Kerr-microresonator frequency combs.Phys

Stone, J. R.et al.Thermal and nonlinear dissipative- soliton dynamics in Kerr-microresonator frequency combs.Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 063902 (2018). Data availability The data that support the plot within this paper and other findings of this study are available upon publication. Code availability The codes that support the findings of this study are availabl...

work page 2018
[47]

(S15) gives the corresponding implicit expression B(mc) s = 4D1arcosh( √ 2) r g D2 √κmPin κ0 +κ m tanh arcosh( √

Bc Bs (S18) so that the collective loss can be written as an effective loss rate κeff(Bs) =κ 0 +κ mFc.(S19) Replacingκ 0 +κ m byκ eff(Bs) in Eq. (S15) gives the corresponding implicit expression B(mc) s = 4D1arcosh( √ 2) r g D2 √κmPin κ0 +κ m tanh arcosh( √

work page
[48]

It is exact within the reduced square-band model once the soliton envelope is approximated by Eq

Bc B(mc) s .(S20) which is the square-band-coupler bandwidth relation used below. It is exact within the reduced square-band model once the soliton envelope is approximated by Eq. (S10). Comparison with the unit coupler is most transparent at a fixed target bandwidth. Rearranging Eq. (S20) gives the pump power required to sustain a square-band-coupler sol...

work page
[49]

(S16) gives P (uc) in,crit(Bs) = D2κ0 4D2 1arcosh2( √ 2)g B2 s .(S22) The corresponding pump-power ratio is therefore P (mc) in (Bs) P (uc) in,crit(Bs) = h κ0 +κ m tanh arcosh( √

Bc Bs 2 .(S21) For the unit coupler at critical coupling, Eq. (S16) gives P (uc) in,crit(Bs) = D2κ0 4D2 1arcosh2( √ 2)g B2 s .(S22) The corresponding pump-power ratio is therefore P (mc) in (Bs) P (uc) in,crit(Bs) = h κ0 +κ m tanh arcosh( √

work page
[50]

In the unit coupler, the full soliton spectrum incurs the external-coupling contributionκ m, so the bandwidth is limited by the total loss rateκ 0 +κ m

Bc Bs i2 4κ0κm .(S23) This expression makes the physical difference between the two couplers explicit. In the unit coupler, the full soliton spectrum incurs the external-coupling contributionκ m, so the bandwidth is limited by the total loss rateκ 0 +κ m. In the square-band coupler, that contribution is weighted only by the spectral fraction inside the co...

work page
[51]

Bc Bs κeff(Bs)≃κ 0 +κ marcosh( √

work page
[52]

(S20) approachesB s ∝ √κmPin/κ0, while Eq

Bc Bs .(S24) In the limit where sidelobe contributions to the external coupling rate are negligible and the coupling band is vanish- ingly narrow,κ eff(Bs)→κ 0 and Eq. (S20) approachesB s ∝ √κmPin/κ0, while Eq. (S23) approachesκ 0/(4κm). The square-band coupler therefore preserves the same square-root dependence onκ mPin as the unit coupler, but with a sm...

work page
[53]

(S20) into Eq

Bc Bs .(S28) Substituting Eq. (S20) into Eq. (S28) gives the corresponding emitted-power relation within the same reduced model, P (mc) emit = s D2 g κm tanh arcosh( √

work page
[54]

Bc B(mc) s √κmPin κ0 +κ m tanh arcosh( √

work page
[55]

Bc B(mc) s .(S29) For the unit coupler at critical coupling,κ m =κ 0, Eq. (S16) gives the corresponding reference emitted comb power P (uc) emit,crit = 1 2 s D2κ0Pin g .(S30) The simultaneous scaling of span and emitted comb power becomes most transparent by defining x≡ κm κ0 , y≡F c = tanh arcosh( √

work page
[56]

Bc B(mc) s .(S31) Equations (S20), (S16), and (S29) then give B(mc) s B(uc) s,opt = 2√x 1 +xy ,(S32) P (mc) emit P (uc) emit,crit = 2x3/2y 1 +xy =xy B(mc) s B(uc) s,opt .(S33) Herexmeasures the enhancement of the peak pump-resonance coupling relative to the intrinsic loss, and 0< y <1 is the spectral-overlap factor between the soliton and the coupling ban...

work page
[57]

For x= 12, 16, and 20, the balanced condition givesy≃0.083, 0.063, and 0.050, respectively, withB c/B(mc) s ≃0.095, 0.071, and 0.057

(S35) At the larger coupling rates accessed experimentally, substantially larger simultaneous enhancement follows. For x= 12, 16, and 20, the balanced condition givesy≃0.083, 0.063, and 0.050, respectively, withB c/B(mc) s ≃0.095, 0.071, and 0.057. For a representative broadband state withB (mc) s /D1 ≈200, these values correspond toB c/D1 ≈19, 14, and 11...

work page
[58]

L. A. Lugiato and R. Lefever, Spatial dissipative structures in passive optical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 2209 (1987)

work page 1987
[59]

Y. K. Chembo and C. R. Menyuk, Spatiotemporal Lugiato-Lefever formalism for Kerr-comb generation in whispering- gallery-mode resonators, Phys. Rev. A87, 053852 (2013)

work page 2013
[60]

S. Coen, H. G. Randle, T. Sylvestre, and M. Erkintalo, Modeling of octave-spanning Kerr frequency combs using a generalized mean-field Lugiato-Lefever model, Opt. Lett.38, 37 (2013). 10

work page 2013
[61]

Godey, I

C. Godey, I. V. Balakireva, A. Coillet, and Y. K. Chembo, Stability analysis of the spatiotemporal lugiato-lefever model for kerr optical frequency combs in the anomalous and normal dispersion regimes, Phys. Rev. A89, 063814 (2014)

work page 2014
[62]

F. Leo, S. Coen, P. Kockaert, S.-P. Gorza, P. Emplit, and M. Haelterman, Temporal cavity solitons in one-dimensional Kerr media as bits in an all-optical buffer, Nat. Photon.4, 471 (2010)

work page 2010
[63]

T. Herr, V. Brasch, J. D. Jost, C. Y. Wang, N. M. Kondratiev, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, Temporal solitons in optical microresonators, Nat. Photon8, 145 (2014)

work page 2014
[64]

Yi, Q.-F

X. Yi, Q.-F. Yang, K. Y. Yang, M.-G. Suh, and K. Vahala, Soliton frequency comb at microwave rates in a high-Q silica microresonator, Optica2, 1078 (2015)

work page 2015

[1] [1]

Bc B(mc) s # ,(5) whereB (mc) s is the full 3 dB soliton bandwidth for a resonator with a meta-coupler. This gives the effective loss κeff(B(mc) s ) =κ 0 +κ mFc,(6) withκ m ≡κ e(0), and the corresponding span scaling B(mc) s ∝ s κmPin κeff(B(mc) s ) .(7) When the coupling band is significantly narrower than the comb, Fc ≪1 andκ eff(B(mc) s )≈κ 0. The addi...

work page

[2] [2]

Leo, F.et al.Temporal cavity solitons in one-dimensional Kerr media as bits in an all-optical buffer.Nat. Photon. 4, 471–476 (2010)

work page 2010

[3] [3]

Photon.8, 145–152 (2014)

Herr, T.et al.Temporal solitons in optical microres- onators.Nat. Photon.8, 145–152 (2014)

work page 2014

[4] [4]

J., Gaeta, A

Kippenberg, T. J., Gaeta, A. L., Lipson, M. & Gorodet- sky, M. L. Dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microres- onators.Science361, eaan8083 (2018)

work page 2018

[5] [5]

B.et al.Microresonator frequency comb optical clock.Optica1, 10–14 (2014)

Papp, S. B.et al.Microresonator frequency comb optical clock.Optica1, 10–14 (2014)

work page 2014

[6] [6]

Photon.10, 516–520 (2016)

Del’Haye, P.et al.Phase-coherent microwave-to-optical link with a self-referenced microcomb.Nat. Photon.10, 516–520 (2016)

work page 2016

[7] [7]

T.et al.An optical-frequency synthesizer using integrated photonics.Nature557, 81–85 (2018)

Spencer, D. T.et al.An optical-frequency synthesizer using integrated photonics.Nature557, 81–85 (2018)

work page 2018

[8] [8]

Y., Yi, X

Suh, M.-G., Yang, Q.-F., Yang, K. Y., Yi, X. & Vahala, K. J. Microresonator soliton dual-comb spectroscopy. Science354, 600–603 (2016)

work page 2016

[9] [9]

Adv.4, e1701858 (2018)

Dutt, A.et al.On-chip dual-comb source for spec- troscopy.Sci. Adv.4, e1701858 (2018)

work page 2018

[10] [10]

Photon.13, 25–30 (2019)

Suh, M.-G.et al.Searching for exoplanets using a mi- croresonator astrocomb.Nat. Photon.13, 25–30 (2019)

work page 2019

[11] [11]

Pho- ton.13, 31 (2019)

Obrzud, E.et al.A microphotonic astrocomb.Nat. Pho- ton.13, 31 (2019)

work page 2019

[12] [12]

Nature546, 274–279 (2017)

Marin-Palomo, P.et al.Microresonator-based solitons for massively parallel coherent optical communications. Nature546, 274–279 (2017)

work page 2017

[13] [13]

Commun.9, 1598 (2018)

F¨ ul¨ op, A.et al.High-order coherent communications us- ing mode-locked dark-pulse Kerr combs from microres- onators.Nat. Commun.9, 1598 (2018). 7

work page 2018

[14] [14]

Nature605, 457–463 (2022)

Shu, H.et al.Microcomb-driven silicon photonic systems. Nature605, 457–463 (2022)

work page 2022

[15] [15]

A.et al.Petabit-per-second data transmis- sion using a chip-scale microcomb ring resonator source

Jørgensen, A. A.et al.Petabit-per-second data transmis- sion using a chip-scale microcomb ring resonator source. Nat. Photon.16, 798–802 (2022)

work page 2022

[16] [16]

Sun, S.et al.Integrated optical frequency division for microwave and mmwave generation.Nature627, 540– 545 (2024)

work page 2024

[17] [17]

Kudelin, I.et al.Photonic chip-based low-noise mi- crowave oscillator.Nature627, 534–539 (2024)

work page 2024

[18] [18]

Photon.19, 637–642 (2025)

Sun, S.et al.Microcavity Kerr optical frequency division with integrated SiN photonics.Nat. Photon.19, 637–642 (2025)

work page 2025

[19] [19]

Jin, X.et al.Microresonator-referenced soliton micro- combs with zeptosecond-level timing noise.Nat. Photon. 19, 630–636 (2025)

work page 2025

[20] [20]

Photon.19, 624–629 (2025)

Ji, Q.-X.et al.Dispersive-wave-agile optical frequency division.Nat. Photon.19, 624–629 (2025)

work page 2025

[21] [21]

Trocha, P.et al.Ultrafast optical ranging using microres- onator soliton frequency combs.Science359, 887–891 (2018)

work page 2018

[22] [22]

& Vahala, K

Suh, M.-G. & Vahala, K. J. Soliton microcomb range measurement.Science359, 884–887 (2018)

work page 2018

[23] [23]

Riemensberger, J.et al.Massively parallel coherent laser ranging using a soliton microcomb.Nature581, 164–170 (2020)

work page 2020

[24] [24]

Brasch, V.et al.Photonic chip–based optical frequency comb using soliton Cherenkov radiation.Science351, 357–360 (2016)

work page 2016

[25] [25]

H.et al.Octave-spanning dissipative Kerr soliton frequency combs in si 3 n 4 microresonators.Op- tica4, 684–691 (2017)

Pfeiffer, M. H.et al.Octave-spanning dissipative Kerr soliton frequency combs in si 3 n 4 microresonators.Op- tica4, 684–691 (2017)

work page 2017

[26] [26]

Li, Q.et al.Stably accessing octave-spanning microres- onator frequency combs in the soliton regime.Optica4, 193–203 (2017)

work page 2017

[27] [27]

E.et al.Terahertz-rate Kerr-microresonator optical clockwork.Phys

Drake, T. E.et al.Terahertz-rate Kerr-microresonator optical clockwork.Phys. Rev. X9, 031023 (2019)

work page 2019

[28] [28]

& Lonˇ car, M

Song, Y., Hu, Y., Zhu, X., Yang, K. & Lonˇ car, M. Octave-spanning Kerr soliton frequency combs in dispersion-and dissipation-engineered lithium niobate microresonators.Light Sci. Appl.13, 225 (2024)

work page 2024

[29] [29]

H.et al.Zero dispersion Kerr solitons in optical microresonators.Nat

Anderson, M. H.et al.Zero dispersion Kerr solitons in optical microresonators.Nat. Commun.13, 4764 (2022)

work page 2022

[30] [30]

Appl.12, 33 (2023)

Xiao, Z.et al.Near-zero-dispersion soliton and broadband modulational instability Kerr microcombs in anomalous dispersion.Light Sci. Appl.12, 33 (2023)

work page 2023

[31] [31]

Ji, Q.-X.et al.Engineered zero-dispersion microcombs using CMOS-ready photonics.Optica10, 279–285 (2023)

work page 2023

[32] [32]

C., Carlson, D

Lucas, E., Yu, S.-P., Briles, T. C., Carlson, D. R. & Papp, S. B. Tailoring microcombs with inverse-designed, meta- dispersion microresonators.Nat. Photon.17, 943–950 (2023)

work page 2023

[33] [33]

& Vahala, K

Yang, Q.-F., Hu, Y., Torres-Company, V. & Vahala, K. Efficient microresonator frequency combs.eLight4, 18 (2024)

work page 2024

[34] [34]

& Herr, T

Obrzud, E., Lecomte, S. & Herr, T. Temporal solitons in microresonators driven by optical pulses.Nat. Photon. 11, 600 (2017)

work page 2017

[35] [35]

Li, J.et al.Efficiency of pulse pumped soliton micro- combs.Optica9, 231–239 (2022)

work page 2022

[36] [36]

& Zhou, B

Xue, X., Zheng, X. & Zhou, B. Super-efficient temporal solitons in mutually coupled optical cavities.Nat. Pho- ton.13, 616–622 (2019)

work page 2019

[37] [37]

B.et al.Surpassing the nonlinear conver- sion efficiency of soliton microcombs.Nat

Helgason, ´O. B.et al.Surpassing the nonlinear conver- sion efficiency of soliton microcombs.Nat. Photon.17, 992–999 (2023)

work page 2023

[38] [38]

Appl.15, 185 (2026)

Zhu, K.et al.Power-efficient ultra-broadband soliton microcombs in resonantly-coupled microresonators.Light Sci. Appl.15, 185 (2026)

work page 2026

[39] [39]

Ex- press24, 10890–10897 (2016)

Wang, P.-H.et al.Intracavity characterization of micro- comb generation in the single-soliton regime.Opt. Ex- press24, 10890–10897 (2016)

work page 2016

[40] [40]

Yang, Q.-F., Yi, X., Yang, K. Y. & Vahala, K. Spatial- mode-interaction-induced dispersive waves and their ac- tive tuning in microresonators.Optica3, 1132–1135 (2016)

work page 2016

[41] [41]

Commun.8, 14869 (2017)

Yi, X.et al.Single-mode dispersive waves and soliton microcomb dynamics.Nat. Commun.8, 14869 (2017)

work page 2017

[42] [42]

Kashyap, R.Fiber Bragg gratings(Academic press, 2009)

work page 2009

[43] [43]

L.et al.Architecture for the photonic in- tegration of an optical atomic clock.Optica6, 680–685 (2019)

Newman, Z. L.et al.Architecture for the photonic in- tegration of an optical atomic clock.Optica6, 680–685 (2019)

work page 2019

[44] [44]

D., Geiselmann, M

Brasch, V., Lucas, E., Jost, J. D., Geiselmann, M. & Kippenberg, T. J. Self-referenced photonic chip soliton Kerr frequency comb.Light Sci Appl.6, e16202 (2017)

work page 2017

[45] [45]

Rev.e01659 (2025)

Wang, Y.et al.Compact turnkey soliton microcombs at microwave rates via wafer-scale fabrication.Laser Pho- ton. Rev.e01659 (2025)

work page 2025

[46] [46]

R.et al.Thermal and nonlinear dissipative- soliton dynamics in Kerr-microresonator frequency combs.Phys

Stone, J. R.et al.Thermal and nonlinear dissipative- soliton dynamics in Kerr-microresonator frequency combs.Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 063902 (2018). Data availability The data that support the plot within this paper and other findings of this study are available upon publication. Code availability The codes that support the findings of this study are availabl...

work page 2018

[47] [47]

(S15) gives the corresponding implicit expression B(mc) s = 4D1arcosh( √ 2) r g D2 √κmPin κ0 +κ m tanh arcosh( √

Bc Bs (S18) so that the collective loss can be written as an effective loss rate κeff(Bs) =κ 0 +κ mFc.(S19) Replacingκ 0 +κ m byκ eff(Bs) in Eq. (S15) gives the corresponding implicit expression B(mc) s = 4D1arcosh( √ 2) r g D2 √κmPin κ0 +κ m tanh arcosh( √

work page

[48] [48]

It is exact within the reduced square-band model once the soliton envelope is approximated by Eq

Bc B(mc) s .(S20) which is the square-band-coupler bandwidth relation used below. It is exact within the reduced square-band model once the soliton envelope is approximated by Eq. (S10). Comparison with the unit coupler is most transparent at a fixed target bandwidth. Rearranging Eq. (S20) gives the pump power required to sustain a square-band-coupler sol...

work page

[49] [49]

(S16) gives P (uc) in,crit(Bs) = D2κ0 4D2 1arcosh2( √ 2)g B2 s .(S22) The corresponding pump-power ratio is therefore P (mc) in (Bs) P (uc) in,crit(Bs) = h κ0 +κ m tanh arcosh( √

Bc Bs 2 .(S21) For the unit coupler at critical coupling, Eq. (S16) gives P (uc) in,crit(Bs) = D2κ0 4D2 1arcosh2( √ 2)g B2 s .(S22) The corresponding pump-power ratio is therefore P (mc) in (Bs) P (uc) in,crit(Bs) = h κ0 +κ m tanh arcosh( √

work page

[50] [50]

In the unit coupler, the full soliton spectrum incurs the external-coupling contributionκ m, so the bandwidth is limited by the total loss rateκ 0 +κ m

Bc Bs i2 4κ0κm .(S23) This expression makes the physical difference between the two couplers explicit. In the unit coupler, the full soliton spectrum incurs the external-coupling contributionκ m, so the bandwidth is limited by the total loss rateκ 0 +κ m. In the square-band coupler, that contribution is weighted only by the spectral fraction inside the co...

work page

[51] [51]

Bc Bs κeff(Bs)≃κ 0 +κ marcosh( √

work page

[52] [52]

(S20) approachesB s ∝ √κmPin/κ0, while Eq

Bc Bs .(S24) In the limit where sidelobe contributions to the external coupling rate are negligible and the coupling band is vanish- ingly narrow,κ eff(Bs)→κ 0 and Eq. (S20) approachesB s ∝ √κmPin/κ0, while Eq. (S23) approachesκ 0/(4κm). The square-band coupler therefore preserves the same square-root dependence onκ mPin as the unit coupler, but with a sm...

work page

[53] [53]

(S20) into Eq

Bc Bs .(S28) Substituting Eq. (S20) into Eq. (S28) gives the corresponding emitted-power relation within the same reduced model, P (mc) emit = s D2 g κm tanh arcosh( √

work page

[54] [54]

Bc B(mc) s √κmPin κ0 +κ m tanh arcosh( √

work page

[55] [55]

Bc B(mc) s .(S29) For the unit coupler at critical coupling,κ m =κ 0, Eq. (S16) gives the corresponding reference emitted comb power P (uc) emit,crit = 1 2 s D2κ0Pin g .(S30) The simultaneous scaling of span and emitted comb power becomes most transparent by defining x≡ κm κ0 , y≡F c = tanh arcosh( √

work page

[56] [56]

Bc B(mc) s .(S31) Equations (S20), (S16), and (S29) then give B(mc) s B(uc) s,opt = 2√x 1 +xy ,(S32) P (mc) emit P (uc) emit,crit = 2x3/2y 1 +xy =xy B(mc) s B(uc) s,opt .(S33) Herexmeasures the enhancement of the peak pump-resonance coupling relative to the intrinsic loss, and 0< y <1 is the spectral-overlap factor between the soliton and the coupling ban...

work page

[57] [57]

For x= 12, 16, and 20, the balanced condition givesy≃0.083, 0.063, and 0.050, respectively, withB c/B(mc) s ≃0.095, 0.071, and 0.057

(S35) At the larger coupling rates accessed experimentally, substantially larger simultaneous enhancement follows. For x= 12, 16, and 20, the balanced condition givesy≃0.083, 0.063, and 0.050, respectively, withB c/B(mc) s ≃0.095, 0.071, and 0.057. For a representative broadband state withB (mc) s /D1 ≈200, these values correspond toB c/D1 ≈19, 14, and 11...

work page

[58] [58]

L. A. Lugiato and R. Lefever, Spatial dissipative structures in passive optical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 2209 (1987)

work page 1987

[59] [59]

Y. K. Chembo and C. R. Menyuk, Spatiotemporal Lugiato-Lefever formalism for Kerr-comb generation in whispering- gallery-mode resonators, Phys. Rev. A87, 053852 (2013)

work page 2013

[60] [60]

S. Coen, H. G. Randle, T. Sylvestre, and M. Erkintalo, Modeling of octave-spanning Kerr frequency combs using a generalized mean-field Lugiato-Lefever model, Opt. Lett.38, 37 (2013). 10

work page 2013

[61] [61]

Godey, I

C. Godey, I. V. Balakireva, A. Coillet, and Y. K. Chembo, Stability analysis of the spatiotemporal lugiato-lefever model for kerr optical frequency combs in the anomalous and normal dispersion regimes, Phys. Rev. A89, 063814 (2014)

work page 2014

[62] [62]

F. Leo, S. Coen, P. Kockaert, S.-P. Gorza, P. Emplit, and M. Haelterman, Temporal cavity solitons in one-dimensional Kerr media as bits in an all-optical buffer, Nat. Photon.4, 471 (2010)

work page 2010

[63] [63]

T. Herr, V. Brasch, J. D. Jost, C. Y. Wang, N. M. Kondratiev, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, Temporal solitons in optical microresonators, Nat. Photon8, 145 (2014)

work page 2014

[64] [64]

Yi, Q.-F

X. Yi, Q.-F. Yang, K. Y. Yang, M.-G. Suh, and K. Vahala, Soliton frequency comb at microwave rates in a high-Q silica microresonator, Optica2, 1078 (2015)

work page 2015