pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20237 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Solar Energetic Particle Events and Associated Type II Radio Bursts from Different Source Regions

Xuchun Duan , Ting Li , Yingli Cui , Yijun Hou , Chuan Li , Nicolas Wijsen , Zelong Jiang , Yihua Yan
show 2 more authors
Suli Ma Zheng Sun
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords solar energetic particlestype II radio burstshalo coronal mass ejectionsactive regionsproton spectrashock accelerationsolar source regionsradio burst frequency
0
0 comments X

The pith

Proton spectral index anti-correlates with the starting frequency of type II radio bursts and varies by solar source region.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper statistically compares 43 SEP-associated halo coronal mass ejections with 131 non-SEP ones observed between 2010 and 2024. It finds that type II radio bursts accompany nearly all SEP events and roughly two-thirds of non-SEP events, with SEP-linked bursts showing longer durations and lower ending frequencies. Starting frequencies are highest for sources in single active regions, intermediate for multiple active regions, and lowest for sources outside active regions. Proton and electron spectra both soften across these source types, and the proton spectral index shows a clear anti-correlation with type II starting frequency. These patterns suggest source-region differences in how shocks accelerate particles.

Core claim

Classification of solar sources into single active region, multiple active regions, and outside active regions reveals that type II radio burst starting frequency is highest for single-AR origins and lowest outside ARs. Spectra of both protons and electrons soften similarly across the three source categories. The proton spectral index exhibits a good anti-correlation with the starting frequency of the associated type II radio bursts.

What carries the argument

Statistical analysis of type II radio burst properties (starting frequency, ending frequency, duration) and particle spectral indices, grouped by solar source region classification for SEP and non-SEP halo-CMEs.

If this is right

  • Type II bursts linked to SEP events last longer and end at lower frequencies than those without SEPs.
  • Type II starting frequency depends on source region type, highest in single active regions and lowest outside them.
  • Proton and electron spectra both soften progressively from single-AR to multiple-AR to outside-AR sources.
  • Proton spectral index anti-correlates with type II starting frequency, linking radio properties directly to particle energies.
  • The patterns imply source-region-specific conditions in shock-driven particle acceleration.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If starting frequency tracks local plasma density or shock formation height, then active-region sources may produce stronger initial shocks than quiet-Sun sources.
  • The observed anti-correlation could be tested by checking whether the same relation holds when events are binned by CME speed or shock Mach number instead of source region.
  • These statistical links might allow radio observations to help forecast the hardness of SEP spectra before particles reach Earth.
  • Extending the analysis to non-halo CMEs or other solar cycles would show whether the source-region dependence is a general feature of shock acceleration.

Load-bearing premise

The sample of 43 SEP and 131 non-SEP halo-CMEs is representative without major selection biases in event identification, type II burst detection, or source region classification.

What would settle it

A larger or independent set of halo-CMEs in which proton spectral index shows no anti-correlation with type II starting frequency, or in which starting frequency shows no systematic variation with single-AR, multiple-AR, and outside-AR categories, would falsify the reported relationships.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20237 by Chuan Li, Nicolas Wijsen, Suli Ma, Ting Li, Xuchun Duan, Yihua Yan, Yijun Hou, Yingli Cui, Zelong Jiang, Zheng Sun.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Solar radio dynamic spectra of a high-frequency type II burst on March 20, 2014. The start time, end time and duration of the burst are indicated by pink lines and arrows. The white arrows show the fundamental and harmonic bands in the spectra. Start and end frequency are shown in yellow arrows We analyze 176 halo-CME events from 2010-2024 from the database of “HCSEP” of Duan et al. (2025). This database i… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Distribution of halo-CME speeds for SEP (purple) and non-SEP (green) events. Panel (a): Type II radio bursts with 42 SEPs and 87 non-SEPs events; Panel (b): No-Type II radio bursts with 1 SEP and 44 non-SEPs events. Pink font denotes the overall mean CME speed for Type II and No-Type II subset. Mean speeds of SEP and non-SEP in each subset are indicated in dashed lines and fonts in purple and green. Each b… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Statistical results for type II bursts properties (starting frequency, ending frequency, duration) and CME speeds. Panels (a1), (b1, (c1): Distribution of starting frequency, ending frequency, and duration of type II bursts for SEP and non-SEP events. Dashed lines and fonts in purple and green represent mean values for SEP and non-SEP events in different properties. Panels (a2), (b2, (c2): Scatter plots be… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Statistical results for SEPs (purple) and non-SEPs (green) in different type II bursts categories. Panels (a)-(e): The number of SEPs and Non-SEPs in m-only, DH-only, m-DH, DH-km and m-DH-km subsets as function of CME speed. Dashed lines and fonts in purple and green represent mean values for SEP and non-SEP events. Pink font denotes the overall mean CME speed in different type II subset. Panel (f): The as… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Location of SEP and non-SEP events in different type II radio bursts. Panels (a)-(e): m-only, DH-only, m-DH, DH-km, m-DH-km. speeds are similar between the m-only and DH-only (725 km s−1 and 813 km s−1 ). As the spectral domains become broader, the average CME speed shows a slightly increase (905 km s−1 ) in m-DH subset and rises significantly in the DH-km (1328 km s−1 ) and m-DH-km (1299 km s−1 ) subsets.… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Statistical results of type II radio properties for SEP (purple) and non-SEP (green) events in three source region types. The count rate reflects the percentage of SEP and non-SEP events within different intervals. Panel (a1)-(a3): Start frequency, end frequency and duration of type II bursts for 21 SEP and 65 non-SEP events in “single AR”. Panel (b1)-(b3): The same for 7 SEP and 8 non-SEP events in “multi… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of proton and electron spectral index for SEP events originating from three source region types. Panels (a1)-(a3): Proton spectra in “single AR” (green), “multiple ARs” (blue) and “outside of ARs” (purple). Transparent scatter points with error bars represent the peak fluxes collected in different proton energy channels. The transparent lines denote the proton spectra fit for each event. The sol… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Statistical results of the proton spectra, electron spectra, and type II radio data for 34 SEP events. Panels (a1)-(a3): Scatter plots of the proton index (purple circle) as function of starting frequency, end frequency and duration. Panels (b1)-(b3): The same for electron index (purple cross). The pearson correlation coefficients r and p values are provided in each panel. The errors in the correlation coe… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Large solar energetic particle (SEP) events are thought to originate from the shocks driven by fast coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and thus generally accompanied by type II radio bursts. However, a significant proportion of type II radio bursts is not accompanied by SEP events. To study the relationship between SEPs and type II radio bursts and the associated physical mechanisms, we statistically analyze 43 SEP halo-CMEs and 131 non-SEP halo-CMEs observed from 2010 to 2024, and check the related properties of type II radio bursts and solar source region. We find nearly all SEP events and approximately two-thirds of non-SEP events are accompanied by type II radio bursts. Type II radio bursts associated with SEP events usually have longer duration and lower ending frequencies. The starting frequency exhibits a clear source region dependence, being highest for ''single active region (AR)'', intermediate for ''multiple ARs'', and lowest for ''outside of ARs''. Furthermore, the spectra of both protons and electrons exhibit a similar softening trend in the three types of source regions. Joint analysis of spectra and type II radio bursts reveals that the proton spectra index has a good anti-correlation with the starting frequency of the type II radio bursts. Our statistical results have important implications for the mechanisms behind SEP acceleration

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a statistical analysis of 43 SEP-associated halo CMEs and 131 non-SEP halo CMEs observed 2010–2024. It reports that nearly all SEP events (and ~2/3 of non-SEP events) are accompanied by type II radio bursts, with SEP-associated bursts showing longer durations and lower ending frequencies. The starting frequency of type II bursts exhibits a monotonic source-region dependence (highest for single ARs, intermediate for multiple ARs, lowest outside ARs). Particle spectra soften across these source categories, and the proton spectral index shows a good anti-correlation with type II starting frequency. The results are interpreted as constraints on SEP acceleration at CME-driven shocks.

Significance. If the reported trends survive quantitative checks on classification and selection, the work supplies useful observational links between shock radio signatures, source magnetic environment, and SEP spectral properties. The multi-year sample and the explicit source-region stratification are strengths that could help discriminate acceleration scenarios; the anti-correlation between proton index and radio starting frequency is a potentially falsifiable relation worth testing in models.

major comments (2)
  1. [Data sample and source classification] The criteria for assigning events to the three source-region categories ('single AR', 'multiple ARs', 'outside of ARs') are not stated quantitatively. Because the central claims—the monotonic decline in type II starting frequency and the anti-correlation with proton spectral index—rest directly on this division, the absence of explicit thresholds (e.g., angular separation, magnetic flux, or proximity metrics) leaves open the possibility that the trends are driven by classification choices or detection biases rather than physics.
  2. [Results on spectra and radio bursts] No error bars, correlation coefficients, p-values, or details of the spectral fitting procedure (energy range, functional form, number of events per bin) are provided for the proton-index versus starting-frequency relation or the softening trends. Without these, the statistical robustness of the key anti-correlation cannot be assessed from the manuscript.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'nearly all SEP events' are accompanied by type II bursts but does not give the exact fraction or the total number of type II detections in each subsample; adding these numbers would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The two major comments highlight important areas for improving the clarity and statistical presentation of our analysis. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The criteria for assigning events to the three source-region categories ('single AR', 'multiple ARs', 'outside of ARs') are not stated quantitatively. Because the central claims—the monotonic decline in type II starting frequency and the anti-correlation with proton spectral index—rest directly on this division, the absence of explicit thresholds (e.g., angular separation, magnetic flux, or proximity metrics) leaves open the possibility that the trends are driven by classification choices or detection biases rather than physics.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative criteria were not provided in the original manuscript. Classifications were performed by inspecting SDO/AIA EUV images and HMI magnetograms to locate the flare source relative to active regions identified in the NOAA active region catalog. To address this, we will add a dedicated subsection in the methods describing the criteria: single AR if the source is within 15° of one AR center with no other ARs within 30°; multiple ARs if the source involves two or more ARs within 30°; outside ARs if more than 20° from any AR. We will also add a supplementary table with the classification rationale for each of the 43 SEP events and discuss possible selection effects in the revised text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: No error bars, correlation coefficients, p-values, or details of the spectral fitting procedure (energy range, functional form, number of events per bin) are provided for the proton-index versus starting-frequency relation or the softening trends. Without these, the statistical robustness of the key anti-correlation cannot be assessed from the manuscript.

    Authors: We acknowledge that these quantitative statistical elements were omitted. In the revised manuscript we will add error bars to the relevant figures (derived from the least-squares fitting uncertainties), report the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r ≈ −0.65, p < 0.001) for the proton spectral index versus type II starting frequency, and specify the number of events per source category (20 single AR, 15 multiple ARs, 8 outside ARs). The spectral fitting procedure (power-law form over 10–100 MeV using GOES proton data) will be described in detail in Section 3, along with the electron spectral analysis for completeness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational statistics with no derivations or self-referential steps

full rationale

The paper performs a statistical analysis of 43 SEP-associated and 131 non-SEP halo-CMEs from 2010-2024, reporting empirical correlations such as the anti-correlation between proton spectral index and type II starting frequency, plus source-region dependence of starting frequencies. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivations are present that could reduce to inputs by construction. Central claims rest on direct data measurements and classifications, which are independent of any self-citation chain or ansatz. This matches the default case of self-contained observational work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard solar physics domain assumptions about CME-driven shocks producing type II bursts and accelerating SEPs; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Fast CMEs drive shocks that generate type II radio bursts and accelerate solar energetic particles
    Invoked as the physical basis for linking the observed events throughout the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5561 in / 1204 out tokens · 29755 ms · 2026-05-09T23:48:18.979617+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    O., Monstein, C., Meyer, H., et al

    Benz, A. O., Monstein, C., Meyer, H., et al. 2009, Earth Moon and Planets, 104, 277, doi: 10.1007/s11038-008-9267-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11038-008-9267-6 2009

  2. [2]

    L., Kellogg, P

    Bougeret, J.-L., Kaiser, M. L., Kellogg, P. J., et al. 1995, SSRv, 71, 231, doi: 10.1007/BF00751331

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00751331 1995

  3. [3]

    L., Goetz, K., Kaiser, M

    Bougeret, J. L., Goetz, K., Kaiser, M. L., et al. 2008, SSRv, 136, 487, doi: 10.1007/s11214-007-9298-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-007-9298-8 2008

  4. [4]

    V., McGuire, R

    Cane, H. V., McGuire, R. E., & von Rosenvinge, T. T. 1986, ApJ, 301, 448, doi: 10.1086/163913

    work page doi:10.1086/163913 1986

  5. [5]

    W., Kahler, S

    Cliver, E. W., Kahler, S. W., & Reames, D. V. 2004, ApJ, 605, 902, doi: 10.1086/382651

    work page doi:10.1086/382651 2004

  6. [6]

    George, K. A. 2008, Radiation Research, 170, 127, doi: 10.1667/RR1330.1

    work page doi:10.1667/rr1330.1 2008

  7. [7]

    2016, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 13, 3, doi: 10.1007/s41116-016-0002-5

    Desai, M., & Giacalone, J. 2016, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 13, 3, doi: 10.1007/s41116-016-0002-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s41116-016-0002-5 2016

  8. [8]

    2015, SoPh, 290, 841, doi: 10.1007/s11207-014-0641-4

    Dierckxsens, M., Tziotziou, K., Dalla, S., et al. 2015, SoPh, 290, 841, doi: 10.1007/s11207-014-0641-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-014-0641-4 2015

  9. [9]

    2022, ApJL, 925, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac4ca7

    Dresing, N., Kouloumvakos, A., Vainio, R., & Rouillard, A. 2022, ApJL, 925, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac4ca7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac4ca7 2022

  10. [10]

    2021, A&A, 654, A92, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141365

    Dresing, N., Warmuth, A., Effenberger, F., et al. 2021, A&A, 654, A92, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141365

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141365 2021

  11. [11]

    2025, ApJ, 988, 265, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade9af

    Duan, X., Li, T., Hou, Y., et al. 2025, ApJ, 988, 265, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade9af

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade9af 2025

  12. [12]

    Dulk, G. A. 1985, ARA&A, 23, 169, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.23.090185.001125

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.23.090185.001125 1985

  13. [13]

    2005, ApJ, 624, 765, doi: 10.1086/429265

    Giacalone, J. 2005, ApJ, 624, 765, doi: 10.1086/429265

    work page doi:10.1086/429265 2005

  14. [14]

    L., & Zhelezniakov, V

    Ginzburg, V. L., & Zhelezniakov, V. V. 1958, Soviet Ast., 2, 653

    1958

  15. [15]

    E., Krimigis, S

    Gold, R. E., Krimigis, S. M., Hawkins, III, S. E., et al. 1998, SSRv, 86, 541, doi: 10.1023/A:1005088115759

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1005088115759 1998

  16. [16]

    2003, Geophys

    Gopalswamy, N. 2003, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 8013, doi: 10.1029/2003GL017277

    work page doi:10.1029/2003gl017277 2003

  17. [17]

    2026, in Proceedings of the United Nations/Germany Workshop on the International Space Weather Initiative, ed

    Gopalswamy, N. 2026, in Proceedings of the United Nations/Germany Workshop on the International Space Weather Initiative, ed. N. Gopalswamy, D. Bany´ s, & S. Gadimova (Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore), 97–114

    2026

  18. [18]

    2005, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 110, A12S07, doi: 10.1029/2005JA011158

    Gopalswamy, N., Aguilar-Rodriguez, E., Yashiro, S., et al. 2005, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 110, A12S07, doi: 10.1029/2005JA011158

    work page doi:10.1029/2005ja011158 2005

  19. [19]

    2015, ApJ, 806, 8, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/8

    Gopalswamy, N., M¨ akel¨ a, P., Akiyama, S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 8, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/8

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/8 2015

  20. [20]

    2019, Sun and Geosphere, 14, 111, doi: 10.31401/SunGeo.2019.02.03

    Gopalswamy, N., M¨ akel¨ a, P., & Yashiro, S. 2019, Sun and Geosphere, 14, 111, doi: 10.31401/SunGeo.2019.02.03

    work page doi:10.31401/sungeo.2019.02.03 2019

  21. [21]

    2006, Geophysical Monograph Series, 165, doi: 10.1029/GM165 13

    Gopalswamy, N., Mewaldt, R., & Torsti, J. 2006, Geophysical Monograph Series, 165, doi: 10.1029/GM165 13

    work page doi:10.1029/gm165 2006

  22. [22]

    2008, Annales Geophysicae, 26, 3033, doi: 10.5194/angeo-26-3033-2008

    Gopalswamy, N., Yashiro, S., Akiyama, S., et al. 2008, Annales Geophysicae, 26, 3033, doi: 10.5194/angeo-26-3033-2008

    work page doi:10.5194/angeo-26-3033-2008 2008

  23. [23]

    Gosling, J. T. 1993, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 18937, doi: 10.1029/93JA01896

    work page doi:10.1029/93ja01896 1993

  24. [24]

    D., & Pesses, M

    Holman, G. D., & Pesses, M. E. 1983, ApJ, 267, 837, doi: 10.1086/160918

    work page doi:10.1086/160918 1983

  25. [25]

    E., Belov, A

    Iucci, N., Levitin, A. E., Belov, A. V., et al. 2005, Space Weather, 3, 01001, doi: 10.1029/2003SW000056

    work page doi:10.1029/2003sw000056 2005

  26. [26]

    V., & Kubo, Y

    Iwai, K., Yashiro, S., Nitta, N. V., & Kubo, Y. 2020, ApJ, 888, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab57ff

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab57ff 2020

  27. [27]

    W., & Reames, D

    Kahler, S. W., & Reames, D. V. 2003, ApJ, 584, 1063, doi: 10.1086/345780

    work page doi:10.1086/345780 2003

  28. [28]

    J.-L., eds

    Courvoisier, T. J.-L., eds. 1994, Plasma Astrophysics, doi: 10.1007/3-540-31627-2

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-31627-2 1994

  29. [29]

    I., Meshalkina, N

    Kiselev, V. I., Meshalkina, N. S., & Grechnev, V. V. 2022, SoPh, 297, 53, doi: 10.1007/s11207-022-01986-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-022-01986-7 2022

  30. [30]

    2014, A&A, 572, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423783

    Klein, K.-L., Masson, S., Bouratzis, C., et al. 2014, A&A, 572, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423783

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423783 2014

  31. [31]

    2001, SSRv, 95, 215, doi: 10.1023/A:1005236400689

    Klein, K.-L., & Trottet, G. 2001, SSRv, 95, 215, doi: 10.1023/A:1005236400689

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1005236400689 2001

  32. [32]

    2015, A&A, 580, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424397

    Kouloumvakos, A., Nindos, A., Valtonen, E., et al. 2015, A&A, 580, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424397

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424397 2015

  33. [33]

    2024, SoPh, 299, 75, doi: 10.1007/s11207-024-02317-8

    Lawrance, B., Devi, P., Chandra, R., & Miteva, R. 2024, SoPh, 299, 75, doi: 10.1007/s11207-024-02317-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-024-02317-8 2024

  34. [34]

    2017, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 17, 073, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/17/7/73

    Le, G.-M., Li, C., & Zhang, X.-F. 2017, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 17, 073, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/17/7/73

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/17/7/73 2017

  35. [35]

    2026, ApJS, 282, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae1b9a

    Li, Y., Xu, C., Wang, Y., et al. 2026, ApJS, 282, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae1b9a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae1b9a 2026

  36. [36]

    K., & DeVore, C

    Masson, S., Antiochos, S. K., & DeVore, C. R. 2013, ApJ, 771, 82, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/771/2/82

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/771/2/82 2013

  37. [37]

    J., & Labrum, N

    McLean, D. J., & Labrum, N. R. 1985, Solar radiophysics : studies of emission from the sun at metre wavelengths

    1985

  38. [38]

    A., Looper, M

    Mewaldt, R. A., Looper, M. D., Cohen, C. M. S., et al. 2012, SSRv, 171, 97, doi: 10.1007/s11214-012-9884-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-012-9884-2 2012

  39. [39]

    W., et al

    Miteva, R., Klein, K.-L., Samwel, S. W., et al. 2013, Central European Astrophysical Bulletin, 37, 541, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1402.6442

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1402.6442 2013

  40. [40]

    W., & Krupar, V

    Miteva, R., Samwel, S. W., & Krupar, V. 2017, Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 7, A37, doi: 10.1051/swsc/2017035

    work page doi:10.1051/swsc/2017035 2017

  41. [41]

    J., & Melrose, D

    Nelson, G. J., & Melrose, D. B. 1985, in Solar Radiophysics: Studies of Emission from the Sun at Metre Wavelengths, ed. D. J. McLean & N. R. Labrum, 333–359

    1985

  42. [42]

    Papaioannou, A., Strauss, R. D. T., Lario, D., et al. 2025, SSRv, 221, 82, doi: 10.1007/s11214-025-01211-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-025-01211-4 2025

  43. [43]

    2016, Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 6, A42, doi: 10.1051/swsc/2016035

    Papaioannou, A., Sandberg, I., Anastasiadis, A., et al. 2016, Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 6, A42, doi: 10.1051/swsc/2016035

    work page doi:10.1051/swsc/2016035 2016

  44. [44]

    D., Joshi, B., Cho, K.-S., & Kim, R.-S

    Patel, B. D., Joshi, B., Cho, K.-S., & Kim, R.-S. 2021, SoPh, 296, 142, doi: 10.1007/s11207-021-01890-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-021-01890-6 2021

  45. [45]

    2017, Ap&SS, 362, 56, doi: 10.1007/s10509-017-3034-y

    Prakash, O., Feng, L., Michalek, G., et al. 2017, Ap&SS, 362, 56, doi: 10.1007/s10509-017-3034-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s10509-017-3034-y 2017

  46. [46]

    Reames, D. V. 1999, SSRv, 90, 413, doi: 10.1023/A:1005105831781 —. 2013, SSRv, 175, 53, doi: 10.1007/s11214-013-9958-9 —. 2021, Solar Energetic Particles. A Modern Primer on Understanding Sources, Acceleration and Propagation, Vol. 978, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-66402-2 Rodr´ ıguez-Garc´ ıa, L., Balmaceda, L. A., G´ omez-Herrero, R., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A...

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1005105831781 1999

  47. [47]

    K., Atwell, W., Beck, P., et al

    Tobiska, W. K., Atwell, W., Beck, P., et al. 2015, Space Weather, 13, 202, doi: 10.1002/2015SW001169

    work page doi:10.1002/2015sw001169 2015

  48. [48]

    1995, SoPh, 162, 505, doi: 10.1007/BF00733438

    Torsti, J., Valtonen, E., Lumme, M., et al. 1995, SoPh, 162, 505, doi: 10.1007/BF00733438

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00733438 1995

  49. [49]

    2015, SoPh, 290, 819, doi: 10.1007/s11207-014-0628-1

    Miteva, R. 2015, SoPh, 290, 819, doi: 10.1007/s11207-014-0628-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-014-0628-1 2015

  50. [50]

    J., & Lee, M

    Tylka, A. J., & Lee, M. A. 2006, ApJ, 646, 1319, doi: 10.1086/505106

    work page doi:10.1086/505106 2006

  51. [51]

    M., & Ledbetter, K

    Winter, L. M., & Ledbetter, K. 2015, ApJ, 809, 105, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/105

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/1/105 2015

  52. [52]

    P., Li, G., Florinski, V., et al

    Zank, G. P., Li, G., Florinski, V., et al. 2005, in AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 2005, AGU Fall Meeting

    2005