arxiv: 2604.20999 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ✦ hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

Search for dark matter produced in association with a dark Higgs boson decaying into a bottom quark-antiquark pair in proton-proton collisions at sqrt{s} = 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 22:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex

keywords dark matterdark Higgs bosonmissing transverse momentumbottom quarksmediatorexclusion limitsproton-proton collisions

0 comments

The pith

No excess found in dark matter search with dark Higgs decaying to bottom quarks, excluding mediator masses up to 4.5 TeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper performs a search in proton-proton collisions for dark matter produced in association with a dark Higgs boson that decays to a bottom quark-antiquark pair. It examines events featuring large missing transverse momentum alongside a resonant structure in the invariant mass of the bottom quark pair. No significant excess over standard model background predictions is observed in the data. This leads to 95% confidence level upper limits on the signal strength for dark Higgs masses below 160 GeV and exclusions of mediator masses up to 4.5 TeV for a 50 GeV dark Higgs and 2.5 TeV for 150 GeV. A reader would care because these results constrain a specific theoretical model of dark sector particles that could explain dark matter.

Core claim

In the absence of any observed signal, the search establishes 95% confidence level upper limits on the signal strength for dark Higgs boson mass hypotheses below 160 GeV. For a dark Higgs boson mass of 50 GeV, mediator masses up to 4.5 TeV are excluded at 95% confidence level, while for 150 GeV the exclusion reaches up to 2.5 TeV. These represent the most stringent limits set to date for the dark Higgs boson masses considered.

What carries the argument

The experimental signature of large missing transverse momentum from the dark matter particles combined with a resonant peak in the invariant mass of the bottom quark-antiquark pair from the dark Higgs decay.

Load-bearing premise

Standard model background processes are accurately estimated from data and simulation without large unaccounted systematic effects, and the theoretical model correctly predicts the production and decay kinematics.

What would settle it

A statistically significant excess of events showing both large missing transverse momentum and a peak in the bottom quark pair invariant mass at the hypothesized dark Higgs mass would support the signal and falsify the null result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20999 by CMS Collaboration.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Post-fit mSD distributions in bins of of the hadronic recoil U. The upper panels present stacked post-fit predictions for the backgrounds superimposed on the data, with an example signal hypothesis overlaid. The lower panels show in red (blue) the pre-fit (post-fit) values of the ratio between the observed data and the predicted SM background, with their associated uncertainties. The gray area represents t… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Expected and observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on the signal strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

A search for dark matter produced in association with a dark Higgs boson decaying into a bottom quark-antiquark pair has been performed using proton-proton collision data at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The search uses data collected with the CMS detector at the CERN LHC during the 2016$-$2018 data-taking period, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The results are interpreted in terms of a theoretical model of dark matter production that, together with a spin-1 gauge boson mediator, predicts the existence of a Higgs-boson-like particle in the dark sector (i.e., a dark Higgs boson). This search focuses on an experimental signature with large missing transverse momentum from dark matter production and a resonant structure in the invariant mass of the bottom quark-antiquark pair from the dark Higgs boson decay. Upper limits at 95% confidence level on the signal strength for dark Higgs boson mass hypotheses below 160 GeV are set. Values of the mediator mass up to 4.5 (2.5) TeV are excluded at 95% confidence level for a dark Higgs boson mass of 50 (150) GeV. This represents the most stringent limits set to date for the dark Higgs boson masses considered in this study.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

CMS sets tighter 95% CL limits on a dark Higgs DM model with full Run 2 data using standard MET plus bb resonance methods, but the advance is incremental.

read the letter

The key takeaway is that this CMS search uses the complete 2016-2018 dataset to place new 95% CL exclusions on mediator masses up to 4.5 TeV (for 50 GeV dark Higgs) and 2.5 TeV (for 150 GeV), which are the strongest so far in this specific parameter range. The signature is high missing transverse momentum paired with a resonant bb pair, interpreted in a model with a spin-1 mediator and dark Higgs decaying to bottoms. They report upper limits on signal strength for dark Higgs masses below 160 GeV. The analysis follows the usual collider playbook of simulated signal acceptance, data-driven background estimates in the high-MET region, and profile-likelihood limits. That part is executed cleanly on paper. What is actually new is simply the larger integrated luminosity applied to this model; the techniques themselves are established extensions of prior CMS and ATLAS DM searches rather than a methodological shift. The paper does well at delivering concrete, falsifiable constraints that theorists can fold into model building. Soft spots are modest and typical for these searches: reliance on simulation for the dark-sector kinematics and potential residual uncertainties in background modeling for Z+jets or top processes in the signal region. The abstract gives no sign of large unaccounted effects, and the stress-test found no internal contradictions in the reported strategy. No free parameters are fitted in a circular way, and the results rest on direct data-simulation comparison. This paper is aimed at the dark-matter collider community and phenomenologists who need updated bounds on this class of models. A serious referee should see it because the dataset is real, the limits are new, and the analysis is reproducible in principle. I would send it to peer review without hesitation.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports a search for dark matter produced in association with a dark Higgs boson decaying to a bottom quark-antiquark pair, using 138 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV proton-proton collision data collected by the CMS detector in 2016-2018. Events are selected with large missing transverse momentum and a resonant structure in the bb invariant mass; results are interpreted in a model with a spin-1 mediator, setting 95% CL upper limits on signal strength for dark Higgs masses below 160 GeV and excluding mediator masses up to 4.5 TeV (2.5 TeV) for dark Higgs masses of 50 GeV (150 GeV), stated as the most stringent limits to date.

Significance. If the background modeling and systematic uncertainties hold, this analysis provides competitive constraints on a dark-sector extension with a dark Higgs boson, using the full Run-2 dataset and standard data-driven techniques in the high-MET + resonant bb channel. The profile-likelihood limit-setting procedure and simulation-based signal acceptance are standard strengths that support the quoted exclusions.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the statement that these are 'the most stringent limits set to date' requires a brief quantitative comparison to prior results (e.g., from ATLAS or earlier CMS searches) to be substantiated; this should appear in the introduction or results section.
The description of background estimation and systematic uncertainties (mentioned in the reader's assessment) should include a dedicated table or subsection quantifying the dominant uncertainties and their effect on the final limits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review of our manuscript and for the positive recommendation of minor revision. The referee's summary accurately reflects the analysis, dataset, and key results, including the 95% CL exclusion limits on the spin-1 mediator mass for the two benchmark dark Higgs masses. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard data-driven limit setting

full rationale

The paper performs a search for dark matter + dark Higgs in the high-MET + resonant bb final state using 138 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV CMS data. Upper limits at 95% CL on signal strength and mediator-mass exclusions are obtained via a profile-likelihood ratio test statistic applied to binned distributions of observed data compared against simulated signal and data-driven background estimates. No central result is obtained by fitting a parameter to a subset of the same data and then reinterpreting that fit as an independent prediction; no self-citation chain is invoked to justify a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that would otherwise be unverified; and the kinematic acceptance and background modeling rest on externally validated simulation and control-region techniques rather than on the target exclusion itself. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the dark sector model and the accuracy of standard model background predictions in the CMS detector; no free parameters are fitted to produce the reported limits.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Standard model background processes and detector response are correctly modeled in simulation and can be validated with data control regions.
Invoked when setting limits on the signal strength after subtracting expected backgrounds.
domain assumption The theoretical model with spin-1 mediator and dark Higgs accurately describes the kinematics and branching ratios of the signal process.
Used to interpret the observed limits in terms of mediator and dark Higgs masses.

invented entities (2)

dark Higgs boson no independent evidence
purpose: Hypothetical particle in the dark sector that decays to bottom quark-antiquark pairs and is produced in association with dark matter.
Postulated by the theoretical model to produce the resonant bb signature; no independent evidence provided beyond the search limits.
spin-1 gauge boson mediator no independent evidence
purpose: Particle that mediates interactions between the visible and dark sectors, enabling dark matter production at the LHC.
Introduced in the model to connect dark matter to standard model particles; no independent evidence outside the limits.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5543 in / 1634 out tokens · 47277 ms · 2026-05-09T22:15:49.572994+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

[1]

Arkani-Hamed, D

N. Arkani-Hamed, D. P . Finkbeiner, T. R. Slatyer, and N. Weiner, “A theory of dark matter”,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 015014,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.015014, arXiv:0810.0713

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.015014 2009
[2]

, year = 1937, month = oct, volume =

F. Zwicky, “On the masses of nebulae and of clusters of nebulae”,Astrophys. J.86(1937) 217,doi:10.1086/143864

work page doi:10.1086/143864 1937
[3]

Bertone, D

G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, “Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints”,Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031, arXiv:hep-ph/0404175

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 2005
[4]

Dark matter benchmark models for early LHC Run-2 searches: Report of the ATLAS/CMS dark matter forum

D. Abercrombie et al., “Dark matter benchmark models for early LHC Run-2 searches: Report of the ATLAS/CMS dark matter forum”,Phys. Dark Univ.27(2020) 100371, doi:10.1016/j.dark.2019.100371,arXiv:1507.00966. References 15

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2019.100371 2020
[5]

Search for new particles in events with energetic jets and large missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Search for new particles in events with energetic jets and large missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV”,JHEP11 (2021) 153,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)153,arXiv:2107.13021

work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2021)153 2021
[6]

Search for new phenomena in events with an energetic jet and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for new phenomena in events with an energetic jet and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 112006,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.112006, arXiv:2102.10874

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.112006 2021
[7]

Hunting the dark Higgs

M. Duerr et al., “Hunting the dark Higgs”,JHEP04(2017) 143, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2017)143,arXiv:1701.08780

work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2017)143 2017
[8]

Dark forces in the sky: Signals from Z ′ and the dark Higgs

N. F. Bell, Y. Cai, and R. K. Leane, “Dark forces in the sky: Signals from Z ′ and the dark Higgs”,JCAP08(2016) 001,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/08/001, arXiv:1605.09382

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/08/001 2016
[9]

Implications of unitarity and gauge invariance for simplified dark matter models

F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, T. Schwetz, and S. Vogl, “Implications of unitarity and gauge invariance for simplified dark matter models”,JHEP02(2016) 016, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)016,arXiv:1510.02110

work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2016)016 2016
[10]

Impact of mass generation for spin-1 mediator simplified models

N. F. Bell, Y. Cai, and R. K. Leane, “Impact of mass generation for spin-1 mediator simplified models”,JCAP01(2017) 039,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/039, arXiv:1610.03063

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/039 2017
[11]

Dark Univ.26(2019) 100377,doi:10.1016/j.dark.2019.100377,arXiv:1703.05703

LHC Dark Matter Working Group, “Recommendations of the LHC Dark Matter Working Group: Comparing LHC searches for dark matter mediators in visible and invisible decay channels and calculations of the thermal relic density”,Phys. Dark Univ.26(2019) 100377,doi:10.1016/j.dark.2019.100377,arXiv:1703.05703

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2019.100377 2019
[12]

LHC and Tevatron bounds on the dark matter direct detection cross-section for vector mediators

M. T. Frandsen et al., “LHC and Tevatron bounds on the dark matter direct detection cross-section for vector mediators”,JHEP07(2012) 123, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2012)123,arXiv:1204.3839

work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2012)123 2012
[13]

A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery

CMS Collaboration, “A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery”,Nature607(2022) 60,doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04892-x, arXiv:2207.00043. [Corrigendum:doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06164-8]

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04892-x 2022
[14]

ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter produced in association with a dark Higgs boson decaying into W+W− in the one-lepton final state at √s= 13 TeV using 139 fb −1 of pp collisions recorded with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP07(2023) 116, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2023)116,arXiv:2211.07175

work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2023)116 2023
[15]

Search for dark matter particles in W +W− events with transverse momentum imbalance in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter particles in W +W− events with transverse momentum imbalance in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV”,JHEP03(2024) 134, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)134,arXiv:2310.12229

work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2024)134 2024
[16]

Search for dark matter produced in association with a dark Higgs boson in the bb final state using pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter produced in association with a dark Higgs boson in the bb final state using pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 121801,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.121801, arXiv:2407.10549

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.121801 2025
[17]

HEPData record for this analysis

“HEPData record for this analysis”, 2026.doi:10.17182/hepdata.170081

work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.170081 2026
[18]

The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST3(2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004. 16

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/s08004 2008
[19]

Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3

CMS Collaboration, “Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3”, JINST19(2024) P05064,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/P05064, arXiv:2309.05466

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/p05064 2024
[20]

Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”,JINST9(2014) P10009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009,arXiv:1405.6569

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/p10009 2014
[21]

The CMS phase-1 pixel detector upgrade

Tracker Group in the CMS Collaboration, “The CMS Phase-1 pixel detector upgrade”, JINST16(2021) P02027,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/02/P02027, arXiv:2012.14304

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/02/p02027 2021
[22]

Track impact parameter resolution for the full pseudo rapidity coverage in the 2017 dataset with the CMS Phase-1 pixel detector

CMS Collaboration, “Track impact parameter resolution for the full pseudo rapidity coverage in the 2017 dataset with the CMS Phase-1 pixel detector”, CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2020-049, 2020

2017
[23]

Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid

CMS Collaboration, “Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid”, CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015

2015
[24]

Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST15(2020) P10017, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017,arXiv:2006.10165

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/p10017 2020
[25]

The CMS trigger system

CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”,JINST12(2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020,arXiv:1609.02366

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/p01020 2017
[26]

Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2

CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2”, JINST19(2024) P11021,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/P11021, arXiv:2410.17038

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/p11021 2024
[27]

Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”,JINST12(2017) P10003,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/p10003 2017
[28]

Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

CMS Collaboration, “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST16(2021) P05014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05014,arXiv:2012.06888

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/p05014 2021
[29]

Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P06015, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015,arXiv:1804.04528

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/p06015 2018
[30]

Reconstruction and identification ofτlepton decays to hadrons and ντ at CMS

CMS Collaboration, “Reconstruction and identification ofτlepton decays to hadrons and ντ at CMS”,JINST11(2016) P01019,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/11/01/P01019, arXiv:1510.07488

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/11/01/p01019 2016
[31]

Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using a deep neural network

CMS Collaboration, “Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using a deep neural network”,JINST17(2022) P07023,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/17/07/P07023, arXiv:2201.08458

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/17/07/p07023 2022
[32]

Cacciari, G.P

M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “The anti-kT jet clustering algorithm”,JHEP04 (2008) 063,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063,arXiv:0802.1189

work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063 2008
[33]

Cacciari, G.P

M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “Fastjet user manual”,Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1896,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2,arXiv:hep-ph/1111.6097. References 17

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2 2012
[34]

Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV”,JINST12(2017) P02014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014,arXiv:1607.03663

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/p02014 2017
[35]

Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data

CMS Collaboration, “Jet algorithms performance in 13 TeV data”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-JME-16-003, 2017

2017
[36]

Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data

CMS Collaboration, “Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data”,JINST15(2020) P09018, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/p09018,arXiv:2003.00503

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/p09018 2020
[37]

Pileup per particle identification

D. Berteloni, H. P ., M. Low, and N. Tran, “Pileup per particle identification”,JHEP10 (2014)doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2014)059,arXiv:1407.6013

work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2014)059 2014
[38]

Jet flavour classification using DeepJet

E. Bols et al., “Jet flavour classification using DeepJet”,JINST15(2020) P12012, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/12/P12012,arXiv:2008.10519

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/12/p12012 2020
[39]

Performance summary of AK4 jet b tagging with data from proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the CMS detector

CMS Collaboration, “Performance summary of AK4 jet b tagging with data from proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the CMS detector”, CMS Detector Performance Summary CMS-DP-2023-005, 2023

2023
[40]

Towards an understanding of jet substructure

M. Dasgupta, A. Fregoso, S. Marzani, and G. P . Salam, “Towards an understanding of jet substructure”,JHEP09(2013) 029,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2013)029, arXiv:1307.0007

work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2013)029 2013
[41]

Jet substructure as a new Higgs search channel at the LHC

J. M. Butterworth, A. R. Davison, M. Rubin, and G. P . Salam, “Jet substructure as a new Higgs search channel at the LHC”,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 242001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.242001,arXiv:0802.2470

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.242001 2008
[42]

Soft drop

A. J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez, and J. Thaler, “Soft drop”,JHEP05(2014) 146, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2014)146,arXiv:1402.2657

work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2014)146 2014
[43]

Identification of heavy, energetic, hadronically decaying particles using machine-learning techniques

CMS Collaboration, “Identification of heavy, energetic, hadronically decaying particles using machine-learning techniques”,JINST15(2020) P06005, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/06/P06005,arXiv:2004.08262

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/06/p06005 2020
[44]

Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using the CMS detector

CMS Collaboration, “Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using the CMS detector”,JINST14(2019) P07004,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/P07004,arXiv:1903.06078

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/p07004 2019
[45]

Sj¨ ostrand, S

T. Sj ¨ostrand et al., “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”,Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024,arXiv:1410.3012

work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024 2015
[46]

Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements

CMS Collaboration, “Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements”,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 4, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4,arXiv:1903.12179

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4 2020
[47]

GEANT4 — a simulation toolkit

GEANT4 Collaboration, “GEANT4—a simulation toolkit”,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 2003
[48]

Ball, et al., JHEP04, 040 (2015)

NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions for the LHC Run II”,JHEP04(2015) 040, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040,arXiv:1410.8849

work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)040 2015
[49]

Parton distributions from high-precision collider data

NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions from high-precision collider data”,Eur. Phys. J.77(2017) 663,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5, arXiv:1706.00428. 18

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5 2017
[50]

Alwall, R

J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”,JHEP07 (2014) 079,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079,arXiv:1405.0301

work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)079 2014
[51]

Matching matrix elements and shower evolution for top-quark production in hadronic collisions

M. L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini, and M. Treccani, “Matching matrix elements and shower evolution for top-quark production in hadronic collisions”,JHEP01(2007) 013, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/01/013,arXiv:hep-ph/0611129

work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/01/013 2007
[52]

Frederix and S

R. Frederix and S. Frixione, “Merging meets matching in MC@NLO”,JHEP12(2012) 061,doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2012)061,arXiv:1209.6215

work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2012)061 2012
[53]

Total top-quark pair-production cross section at hadron colliders throughO(α 4 S)

M. Czakon, P . Fiedler, and A. Mitov, “Total top-quark pair-production cross section at hadron colliders throughO(α 4 S)”,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 252004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.252004,arXiv:1303.6254

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.252004 2013
[54]

A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

P . Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms”,JHEP11(2004) 040,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040 2004
[55]

Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

S. Frixione, P . Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method”,JHEP11(2007) 070, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070,arXiv:0709.2092

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070 2007
[56]

A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX”,JHEP06(2010) 043, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043,arXiv:1002.2581

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1007/jhep06(2010)043 2010
[57]

NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG:s- andt-channel contributions

S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG:s- andt-channel contributions”,JHEP09(2009) 111, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/111,arXiv:0907.4076. [Erratum: doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2010)011]

work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/111 2009
[58]

Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method

E. Re, “Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method”,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1547, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1547-z,arXiv:1009.2450

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1547-z 2011
[59]

HATHOR: HAdronic Top and Heavy quarks crOss section calculatoR

M. Aliev et al., “HATHOR: HAdronic Top and Heavy quarks crOss section calculatoR”, Comput. Phys. Commun.182(2011) 1034,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2010.12.040, arXiv:1007.1327

work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2010.12.040 2011
[60]

HATHOR for single top-quark production: Updated predictions and uncertainty estimates for single top-quark production in hadronic collisions

P . Kant et al., “HATHOR for single top-quark production: Updated predictions and uncertainty estimates for single top-quark production in hadronic collisions”,Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 74,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.02.001, arXiv:1406.4403

work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.02.001 2015
[61]

W +W− production at hadron colliders in next to next to leading order QCD

T. Gehrmann et al., “W +W− production at hadron colliders in next to next to leading order QCD”,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 212001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.212001,arXiv:1408.5243

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.212001 2014
[62]

An update on vector boson pair production at hadron colliders

J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis, “An update on vector boson pair production at hadron colliders”,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 113006,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.113006, arXiv:hep-ph/9905386

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.113006 1999
[63]

Precise predictions for V+jets dark matter backgrounds

J. M. Lindert et al., “Precise predictions for V+jets dark matter backgrounds”,Eur. Phys. J.77(2017) 829,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5389-1,arXiv:1705.04664. References 19

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5389-1 2017
[64]

Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS

CMS Collaboration, “Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS”,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 800, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2,arXiv:2104.01927

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2 2015
[65]

CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s= 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s= 13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004, 2018

2017
[66]

CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s= 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s= 13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002, 2019

2018
[67]

Performance of the CMS missing transverse momentum reconstruction in pp data at √s= 8 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS missing transverse momentum reconstruction in pp data at √s= 8 TeV”,JINST10(2015) P02006, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/10/02/P02006,arXiv:1411.0511

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/10/02/p02006 2015
[68]

Search for new physics in final states with an energetic jet or a hadronically decaying W or Z boson and transverse momentum imbalance at√s=13 TeV

CMS Collaboration, “Search for new physics in final states with an energetic jet or a hadronically decaying W or Z boson and transverse momentum imbalance at√s=13 TeV”,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 092005,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.092005, arXiv:1712.02345

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.092005 2018
[69]

Incorporating nuisance parameters in likelihoods for multisource spectra

J. S. Conway, “Incorporating nuisance parameters in likelihoods for multisource spectra”, inPHYSTAT 2011, p. 115. 2011.arXiv:1103.0354. doi:10.5170/CERN-2011-006.115

work page doi:10.5170/cern-2011-006.115 2011
[70]

Confidence Level Computation for Combining Searches with Small Statistics

T. Junk, “Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A434(1999) 435,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00498-2, arXiv:hep-ex/9902006

work page Pith review doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(99)00498-2 1999
[71]

Presentation of search results: the CL s technique

A. L. Read, “Presentation of search results: The CL s technique”,J. Phys. G28(2002) 2693, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313

work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313 2002
[72]

Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics”,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1554, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0,arXiv:1007.1727. [Erratum: doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2501-z]. 20 21 A The CMS Collaboration Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia A. Hayrapetyan, V . Makarenko , A. Tumasya...

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0 2011