pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21063 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · 💻 cs.IR

Automated Extraction of Pharmacokinetic Parameters from Structured XML Scientific Articles: Enhancing Data Accessibility at Scale

Remya Ampadi Ramachandran , Lisa A. Tell , Sidharth Rai , Nuwan Millagaha Gedara , Hossein Sholehrasa , Jim E. Riviere , Majid Jaberi-Douraki This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IR
keywords pharmacokinetic parameterstable extractionXML scientific articlesautomated data mininginformation extractionscientific literature parsingdata accessibilityAI table detection
0
0 comments X

The pith

AI algorithms can extract pharmacokinetic parameters from XML tables in scientific articles by using row and column header information to preserve cell structure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The field of pharmacology lacks centralized repositories of quantitative pharmacokinetic data, leaving researchers to manually comb through tables scattered across thousands of publications. This paper sets out to show that AI models for table detection and extraction can succeed where generic approaches fail by treating table cells according to the structural cues provided by headers. If the approach works, it would convert a slow, error-prone manual task into an automated process capable of handling the daily flood of new papers and supplementary materials. The key is aligning extracted content with how a human reader interprets layout and relationships within the table. Success here would make PK parameters far more accessible for research and development work.

Core claim

The central claim is that AI algorithms for table detection and extraction succeed when they precisely handle cells organized according to the table structure indicated by column and row header information, thereby capturing content in the manner a human reader would naturally comprehend it and enabling large-scale harvesting of pharmacokinetic parameters from XML scientific articles.

What carries the argument

AI models for table detection and extraction that use column and row header information to organize and align cell contents according to the table's inherent structure.

If this is right

  • Quantitative PK data can be collected continuously rather than through episodic manual efforts.
  • Centralized repositories of pharmacokinetic parameters become feasible to maintain and update.
  • Data collection scales to match the volume of new publications and supplementary materials released daily.
  • Error rates in extracted values drop compared with purely manual processes that suffer from fatigue and staffing limits.
  • Pharmacology R&D gains faster access to organized quantitative results across the literature.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same header-guided extraction logic could be tested on tables from adjacent fields such as toxicology or clinical trial reporting.
  • Once a modest number of papers are processed, the resulting structured data could itself serve as training material to refine the AI models further.
  • Conversion pipelines from PDF or HTML to XML might extend the reach of the method to papers that do not originally publish in XML.

Load-bearing premise

Structural information present in XML tables will be sufficient, when combined with AI models, to accurately extract data from the diverse and complex table layouts found across real pharmacology publications without requiring substantial manual fixes.

What would settle it

Apply the extraction system to a held-out collection of recent pharmacology papers containing varied table formats and measure the fraction of pharmacokinetic parameter values that match a manually verified ground-truth set.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21063 by Hossein Sholehrasa, Jim E. Riviere, Lisa A. Tell, Majid Jaberi-Douraki, Nuwan Millagaha Gedara, Remya Ampadi Ramachandran, Sidharth Rai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overall workflow of table data extraction methodology from scientific articles of XML and HTML file types. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overall workflow of table data extraction methodology from scientific articles of XML [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Case 3: a) Table extracted from the XML document: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Table extracted from the XML files for DOIs: a) /10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.12.002, b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In the field of pharmacology, there is a notable absence of centralized, comprehensive, and up-to-date repositories of PK data. This poses a significant challenge for R&D as it can be a time-consuming and challenging task to collect all the required quantitative PK parameters from diverse scientific publications. This quantitative PK information is predominantly organized in tabular format, mostly available as XML, HTML, or PDF files within various online repositories and scientific publications, including supplementary materials. This makes tables one of the crucial components and information elements of scientific or regulatory documents as they are commonly utilized to present quantitative information. Extracting data from tables is typically a labor-intensive process, and alternative automated machine learning models may struggle to accurately detect and extract the relevant data due to the complex nature and diverse layouts of tabular data. The difficulty of information extraction and reading order detection is largely dependent on the structural complexity of the tables. Efforts to understand tables should prioritize capturing the content of table cells in a manner that aligns with how a human reader naturally comprehends the information. FARAD has been manually extracting tabular data and other information from literature and regulatory agencies for over 40 years. However, there is now an urgent need to automate this process due to the large volume of publications released daily. The accuracy of this task has become increasingly challenging, as manual extraction is tedious and prone to errors, especially given the staffing shortages we are currently facing. This necessitates the development of AI algorithms for table detection and extraction that are able to precisely handle cells organized according to the table structure, as indicated by column and/or row header information.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper identifies the absence of centralized repositories for pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters in pharmacology and argues that manual extraction from tables in XML/HTML/PDF scientific articles is inefficient and error-prone. It calls for AI algorithms capable of table detection and extraction that respect row/column header structure to enable scalable, accurate automated extraction, citing the long-standing manual efforts of FARAD as motivation.

Significance. If a working, validated system were delivered, the work could meaningfully advance data accessibility for PK parameters by reducing reliance on manual curation and enabling larger-scale literature mining. The manuscript, however, contains no implementation, training details, evaluation protocol, or accuracy results, so the claimed enhancement remains aspirational rather than demonstrated.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and throughout): The central claim that 'AI algorithms for table detection and extraction' exist which are 'able to precisely handle cells organized according to the table structure, as indicated by column and/or row header information' is unsupported. The manuscript supplies no architecture description, training corpus, evaluation dataset of real pharmacology tables, performance metrics, or error analysis, rendering the feasibility assertion untested.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We acknowledge that our manuscript is a position paper focused on the problem of scaling PK parameter extraction and the need for advanced table-handling AI, rather than a report of a completed implementation. We will revise the abstract and related sections to eliminate any ambiguity in our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and throughout): The central claim that 'AI algorithms for table detection and extraction' exist which are 'able to precisely handle cells organized according to the table structure, as indicated by column and/or row header information' is unsupported. The manuscript supplies no architecture description, training corpus, evaluation dataset of real pharmacology tables, performance metrics, or error analysis, rendering the feasibility assertion untested.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the manuscript provides no architecture, training details, evaluation protocol, or results, as it does not present a working system. The text explicitly states that manual extraction is inefficient and that 'this necessitates the development of AI algorithms for table detection and extraction that are able to precisely handle cells organized according to the table structure'. Our intent was to describe the domain challenge, cite the long-standing manual efforts of FARAD, and motivate future work on structure-aware table extraction for pharmacology literature. The phrasing in the abstract was imprecise and could be read as implying existing validated solutions. We will revise the abstract, introduction, and conclusion to clearly position the paper as a problem statement and call for action, removing any suggestion that such algorithms have been built or tested here. This change will align the claims with the actual content of the manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; purely descriptive proposal with no derivations or self-referential claims

full rationale

The paper articulates the need for AI-based table extraction from XML pharmacology documents and notes the limitations of manual processes at FARAD, but contains no equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or uniqueness theorems. No load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs by construction, self-citation, or renaming; the text is a high-level problem statement without any algorithmic derivation chain that could be circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on the domain assumption that XML-encoded tables contain usable structural signals and that AI can be trained to interpret them reliably; no free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms are introduced in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5626 in / 1049 out tokens · 29663 ms · 2026-05-09T23:00:19.755234+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

14 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A pharmacokinetic study on a novel anti- HBV agent imidol hydrochloride in rats

    Liu Z, Peng Y , Ma B, Bi K, Liu Y , Sun G, et al. A pharmacokinetic study on a novel anti- HBV agent imidol hydrochloride in rats. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2014 Jan 30;461(1):514–8. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.12.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.12.002 2014

  2. [2]

    Goss G, Shepherd FA, Laurie S, Gauthier I, Leighl N, Chen E, et al. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of daily oral cediranib, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinases, in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.022 2009

  3. [3]

    Bioanalysis of niclosamide in plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass and application to pharmacokinetics in rats and dogs

    Choi HI, Kim T, Lee SW, Woo Kim J, Ju Noh Y , Kim GY , et al. Bioanalysis of niclosamide in plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass and application to pharmacokinetics in rats and dogs. Journal of Chromatography B. 2021 Aug 1;1179:122862. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2021.122862

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2021.122862 2021

  4. [4]

    Dose-Independent Pharmacokinetics of a New Reversible Proton Pump Inhibitor, KR-60436, after Intravenous and Oral Administration to Rats: Gastrointestinal First-Pass Effect

    Yu SY , Bae SK, Kim EJ, Kim YG, Kim SO, Lee DH, et al. Dose-Independent Pharmacokinetics of a New Reversible Proton Pump Inhibitor, KR-60436, after Intravenous and Oral Administration to Rats: Gastrointestinal First-Pass Effect. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2003 Aug 1;92(8):1592–603. doi:10.1002/jps.10427

    work page doi:10.1002/jps.10427 2003

  5. [5]

    Effect of Dehydration on the Pharmacokinetics of Oxytetracycline Hydrochloride Administered Intravenously in Goats (Capra hircus)

    Elsheikh HA, Intisar AMO, Eltayeb IB, Abdullah AS. Effect of Dehydration on the Pharmacokinetics of Oxytetracycline Hydrochloride Administered Intravenously in Goats (Capra hircus). General Pharmacology: The Vascular System. 1998 Sep 1;31(3):455–8. doi:10.1016/S0306-3623(98)00013-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0306-3623(98)00013-5 1998

  6. [6]

    Kinetics and anthelmintic efficacy of topical eprinomectin when given orally to goats

    Badie C, Lespine A, Devos J, Sutra JF, Chartier C. Kinetics and anthelmintic efficacy of topical eprinomectin when given orally to goats. Veterinary Parasitology. 2015 Apr 15;209(1):56–61. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.013 2015

  7. [7]

    Borgatti and Martin G

    Hoffman A, Stepensky D, Ezra A, Van Gelder JM, Golomb G. Mode of administration- dependent pharmacokinetics of bisphosphonates and bioavailability determination. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2001 Jun 4;220(1):1–11. doi:10.1016/S0378- 5173(01)00654-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0378- 2001

  8. [8]

    Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in lactating goats (Capra hircus) and its quantification in milk after a single intravenous and intramuscular injection

    De Vito V , Łebkowska-Wieruszewsk B, Lavy E, Lisowski A, Owen H, Giorgi M. Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in lactating goats (Capra hircus) and its quantification in milk after a single intravenous and intramuscular injection. Small Ruminant Research. 2018 Mar 1;160:38–43. doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.01.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.01.001 2018

  9. [9]

    Population pharmacokinetics of rufloxacin in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

    Imbimbo BP, Klietmann W, Broccali GP, Cesana M, Aarons L. Population pharmacokinetics of rufloxacin in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 1997 Jan 1;5(1):37–42. doi:10.1016/S0928-0987(96)00254-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0928-0987(96)00254-0 1997

  10. [10]

    Prediction of Losartan-Active Carboxylic Acid Metabolite Exposure Following Losartan Administration Using Static and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models

    Nguyen HQ, Lin J, Kimoto E, Callegari E, Tse S, Obach RS. Prediction of Losartan-Active Carboxylic Acid Metabolite Exposure Following Losartan Administration Using Static and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2017 Sep 1;106(9):2758–70. doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2017.03.032

    work page doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2017.03.032 2017

  11. [11]

    In: Progress in Medicinal Chemistry [Internet]

    Recent Progress in the Discovery and Development of Small-Molecule Modulators of CFTR. In: Progress in Medicinal Chemistry [Internet]. Elsevier; 2018 [cited 2026 Apr 22]. p. 235–

    2018

  12. [12]

    Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/chapter/bookseries/pii/S0079646818300018 doi:10.1016/bs.pmch.2018.01.001

    work page doi:10.1016/bs.pmch.2018.01.001 2018

  13. [13]

    The influence of food on the pharmacokinetics of piperaquine in healthy Vietnamese volunteers

    Hai TN, Hietala SF, Van Huong N, Ashton M. The influence of food on the pharmacokinetics of piperaquine in healthy Vietnamese volunteers. Acta Tropica. 2008 Aug 1;107(2):145–9. doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.05.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.05.013 2008

  14. [14]

    Using pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to optimise dosing of antifungal agents in critically ill patients: a systematic review

    Sinnollareddy M, Peake SL, Roberts MS, Lipman J, Roberts JA. Using pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to optimise dosing of antifungal agents in critically ill patients: a systematic review. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2012 Jan 1;39(1):1–10. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.07.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.07.013 2012