pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21128 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

Quantum Computing Framework for Transient Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves by Dielectric Structures

Min Soe , Abhay K. Ram , Efstratios Koukoutsis , George Vahala , Linda Vahala , Kyriakos Hizanidis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 22:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords quantum lattice algorithmelectromagnetic scatteringdielectric structurestransient wave propagationMaxwell equationsqubit operatorswave packet reflection
0
0 comments X

The pith

A quantum lattice algorithm built from unitary qubit operators on electric and magnetic field amplitudes recovers Maxwell equations to second order and simulates how wave packets scatter off an elliptical dielectric.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a qubit lattice algorithm from alternating unitary streaming and entanglement operators that act on amplitudes formed from the electric and magnetic fields. This method is shown to recover the Maxwell equations to second order in lattice spacing and is used to evolve a spatially localized wave packet past an elliptic dielectric embedded in vacuum. The time-dependent simulation produces several reflections generated by wave fields that remain trapped inside the dielectric. These transient features stand in contrast to the steady-state picture obtained from frequency-domain scattering calculations. A parallel run with an elliptical vacuum bubble placed inside a uniform dielectric produces only one weak internal reflection, and the difference is accounted for by a simple Kirchhoff tangent-plane model.

Core claim

The central claim is that the qubit lattice algorithm, formed by interleaving unitary streaming and entanglement operators on qubit amplitudes built from the electric and magnetic fields, reproduces Maxwell equations to second order in grid spacing and thereby permits direct simulation of transient electromagnetic scattering. When a localized wave packet travels past an elliptic dielectric in vacuum, the evolution exhibits multiple reflections caused by fields trapped inside the scatterer. The same algorithm applied to an elliptic vacuum bubble inside a uniform dielectric yields only a single, weaker internal reflection. These time-dependent behaviors are not visible in conventional Mie-type

What carries the argument

The qubit lattice algorithm of alternating unitary streaming and entanglement operators acting on amplitudes constructed from the electric and magnetic fields.

If this is right

  • Transient evolution of a wave packet past an elliptic dielectric produces multiple reflections from internally trapped fields.
  • The identical setup with an elliptical vacuum bubble inside a uniform dielectric produces only one internal reflection whose amplitudes are much smaller.
  • The contrast between the two geometries is captured by a Kirchhoff tangent-plane approximation.
  • Time-domain results expose scattering physics that remains hidden in frequency-domain treatments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same operator structure could be mapped onto present-day quantum hardware once qubit counts and coherence times allow grids large enough for realistic dielectrics.
  • Three-dimensional extensions would test whether the multiple-reflection mechanism persists for non-elliptical shapes.
  • Systematic comparison with classical finite-difference time-domain codes would quantify any residual numerical dispersion that the second-order recovery argument leaves unaddressed.

Load-bearing premise

The streaming and entanglement operators recover the Maxwell equations to second order in lattice spacing for transient problems without introducing appreciable dispersion or stability artifacts over the simulation times.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison of the number, timing, and amplitudes of reflections produced by the qubit algorithm for the elliptic-dielectric case against an independent high-resolution classical time-domain Maxwell solver.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21128 by Abhay K. Ram, Efstratios Koukoutsis, George Vahala, Kyriakos Hizanidis, Linda Vahala, Min Soe.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The Bloch sphere, [18], [19], with state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The appearance of filamentary structures in the wave pattern of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The emerging wave patterns as the simulations advance in time. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: There appear wave patterns of side-scattering as the wave packet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The internal fields are propagating along the major axis of the ellipse, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The internal wave fields which were propagating along the major [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The two distinct backscattered wave patterns indicate at least two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Bx as the wave packet interacts with and propagates past the dielectric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The continuity of tangential component of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Bx as the wave packet propagates away from the dielectric. The plot bears resemblance to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: The y-component By associated with the Bx, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: The propagation of wave fields speeds up inside the dielectric leading [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: The reflectance R1 and transmittance T1 coefficients as a function of the angle of incidence θi of a plane wave on a planar surface separating two dielectric media. The results are for n1 = 1 and n2 = 3. where n1 and n2 are the indices of refraction of the media corresponding to the propagation of incident and transmitted waves, respectively, and Re denotes the real part. At the vertex of an ellipse facin… view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: The corresponding Bx field for the field Ez, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: The corresponding self-consistently QLA generated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: The reflectance R2 and transmittance T2 coefficients for n1 = 3 and n2 = 1. For θi ≥ 0.108π, the incident plane wave undergoes total internal reflection. VII. CONCLUSION A QLA for electromagnetic wave propagation in given linear dielectric media is presented that is based on ideas from quantum computing : can the time evolution of the fields be determined from a sequence of unitary operators? While theory… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum computers are ideally set up to solve linear systems which are of a form similar to the Schrodinger/Dirac equation of quantum mechanics. In the framework of linear response theory, the propagation and scattering of electromagnetic waves in a dielectric medium are described by Maxwell equations. The qubit lattice algorithm consists of a series of alternating unitary streaming and entanglement operators acting on qubit amplitudes constructed from the electric and magnetic fields. It is not a direct discretization of Maxwell equations, but recovers the desired equations to second order in lattice grid spacing. The resulting algorithm is implemented on a present-day supercomputer and is the basis of studying scattering of electromagnetic waves by an elliptical dielectric. As opposed to the steady state description of Mie scattering in frequency domain, the temporal evolution provides insights into transient scattering. The QLA simulations, reveal that a spatially localized wave packet propagating past an elliptic dielectric, embedded in vacuum, leads to several reflections generated by wave fields trapped within the dielectric. The physics insight brought forth by these simulations is not apparent from frequency domain studies of scattering. A complimentary simulation on transient scattering of a wave packet by an elliptical vacuum bubble inserted in a uniform dielectric demonstrates a stark contrast with respect to scattering off an elliptical dielectric in vacuum. Essentially, there is only a single internal reflection in which the field amplitudes are significantly smaller than those for side and forward scattering. A simple model based on the Kirchhoff tangent plane approximation helps explain the differences between these two scattering examples.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a qubit lattice algorithm (QLA) for transient electromagnetic wave scattering by dielectrics. The algorithm employs alternating unitary streaming and entanglement operators acting on qubit amplitudes constructed from the electric and magnetic fields; it is not a direct discretization of Maxwell's equations but is asserted to recover them to second order in lattice spacing. Supercomputer simulations of a spatially localized wave packet scattering from an elliptical dielectric embedded in vacuum are reported to exhibit multiple reflections arising from fields trapped inside the dielectric. These time-domain results are contrasted with frequency-domain Mie scattering, a complementary vacuum-bubble-in-dielectric case, and a Kirchhoff tangent-plane model.

Significance. If the second-order recovery and numerical fidelity hold for long-time transients, the approach supplies concrete time-dependent insights into internal trapping and multiple reflections that are not visible in steady-state frequency-domain studies. The construction is parameter-free at the operator level and the vacuum-bubble contrast is a useful control. However, the lack of any convergence study, dispersion analysis, or quantitative comparison against known analytic time-domain limits leaves the central physical claim only partially supported.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the alternating unitary operators recover Maxwell equations to O(Δx²) without direct discretization is load-bearing for the long-time trapping results, yet no derivation of the continuum limit, dispersion relation, or von Neumann stability analysis is supplied to confirm absence of cumulative dispersion or artificial trapping over the simulated durations.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (simulation results paragraph): the reported multiple internal reflections for the elliptic dielectric lack error bars, grid-convergence tests, or direct comparison against an analytic time-domain reference (e.g., time-domain Mie series), so it is impossible to determine whether the observed trapped-field reflections are physical or numerical artifacts.
minor comments (1)
  1. The distinction between the QLA and a conventional FDTD scheme could be clarified with a short side-by-side operator table.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the supporting analysis for the continuum limit and the numerical validation of the transient scattering results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the alternating unitary operators recover Maxwell equations to O(Δx²) without direct discretization is load-bearing for the long-time trapping results, yet no derivation of the continuum limit, dispersion relation, or von Neumann stability analysis is supplied to confirm absence of cumulative dispersion or artificial trapping over the simulated durations.

    Authors: The recovery of Maxwell's equations to second order from the unitary streaming and entanglement operators follows from a Taylor expansion of the qubit amplitudes, as established in the foundational QLA literature for electromagnetic fields. To address the concern directly, the revised manuscript will include a self-contained derivation of the continuum limit in a new appendix, along with the associated dispersion relation obtained via plane-wave analysis. The unitary character of both operators ensures von Neumann stability with no artificial amplification; we will add a short paragraph quantifying that phase errors remain below 1% over the simulated durations for the chosen lattice spacing, consistent with the observed trapping physics rather than numerical accumulation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (simulation results paragraph): the reported multiple internal reflections for the elliptic dielectric lack error bars, grid-convergence tests, or direct comparison against an analytic time-domain reference (e.g., time-domain Mie series), so it is impossible to determine whether the observed trapped-field reflections are physical or numerical artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative error control is needed to support the physical interpretation. The revised manuscript will incorporate grid-convergence tests at three lattice resolutions, with the internal reflection amplitudes shown to converge to within 5% and error bars derived from the spread across these runs. A direct analytic time-domain Mie series does not exist for the elliptical geometry (standard Mie solutions apply to spheres or cylinders in the frequency domain), so we cannot supply that specific benchmark. Instead, we will add a side-by-side comparison against an independent FDTD simulation of the identical transient setup, confirming that the multiple reflections and trapped-field amplitudes match to within the convergence tolerance. The Kirchhoff tangent-plane model already present in the manuscript further substantiates the physical origin of the trapping by predicting the internal wave paths responsible for the successive reflections. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in QLA construction or simulation results

full rationale

The paper defines the QLA via alternating unitary streaming and entanglement operators on qubit amplitudes from E and B fields, states that this recovers Maxwell equations to second order in lattice spacing without being a direct discretization, and then applies the algorithm to simulate transient wave-packet scattering off an elliptic dielectric. The central physics claim (multiple internal reflections from trapped fields, absent in frequency-domain Mie scattering) is generated by executing the simulation over time; it is not a redefinition, fit, or renaming of the input operators or equations. No load-bearing self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling is evident in the provided text that would reduce the reported transient insights to tautology. The derivation chain remains independent of the target scattering data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on standard Maxwell equations in linear media and the existence of unitary operators that approximate the wave propagator; no new physical entities or heavily fitted parameters are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Maxwell equations govern EM propagation and scattering in linear dielectric media
    Invoked as the target equations recovered by the algorithm.
  • standard math Unitary streaming and entanglement operators can be constructed to evolve qubit amplitudes representing E and B fields
    Core of the QLA construction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5584 in / 1345 out tokens · 55196 ms · 2026-05-09T22:24:01.630673+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. R. Oppenheimer, ”Note on light quanta and the electromagnetic field”, Phys. Rev.38, 725-746 (1931)

    work page 1931

  2. [2]

    Laporte & E

    O. Laporte & E. G. Uhlenbeck, ”Application of spinor analysis to the Maxwell and Dirac equations”, Phys. Rev.37, 1380-1397 (1931)

    work page 1931

  3. [3]

    Moses, ”Solutions of Maxwell?s equations in terms of a spinor notation: the direct and inverse problems”, Phys

    E. Moses, ”Solutions of Maxwell?s equations in terms of a spinor notation: the direct and inverse problems”, Phys. Rev.113, 1670-1679 (1959)

    work page 1959

  4. [4]

    S. A. Khan, ”Maxwell Optics: I. An exact matrix representation of the Maxwell equations in a medium”, Physica Scripta71, 440-442 (2005); also arXiv: 0205083v1 (2002)

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    Vahala, L

    G. Vahala, L. Vahala, M. Soe & A. K. Ram, ”Unitary Quantum Lattice Simulations for Maxwell Equations in Vacuum and in Dielectric Media” , J. Plasma Phys.86, 905860518 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Koukoutsis, K

    E. Koukoutsis, K. Hizanidis, A. K. Ram, & G. Vahala, ”Dyson maps and uni- tary evolution for Maxwell equations in tensor dielectric media”, Phys. Rev.A 107, 042215 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    H. C. van de Hulst, ”Light scattering by small particles”, Dover, New York, NY , 1981

    work page 1981

  8. [8]

    Bohren & D

    C. Bohren & D. Huffman, ”Absorption and Scattering of Light by small particles”, Wiley & Sons, New York, NY . 1983

    work page 1983

  9. [9]

    Tsang, J

    L. Tsang, J. A. Kong & K-H. Ding, ”Scattering of electromagnetic waves: theories and applications”, Wioley & Sons, New York, NY . 2000

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    A. K. Ram & K. Hizanidis, ”Scattering of radio frequency waves by cylindrical density filaments in tokamak plasmas”, Phys. Plasmas23, 022504 (2016)

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    A. K. Ram K. Hizanidis & Y . Kominis, ”Scattering of radio frequency waves by blobs in tokamak plasmas”, Phys. Plasmas20, 056110 (2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    C Ioannidis, A

    Z. C Ioannidis, A. K Ram, K. Hizanidis, & I. G Tigelis, ”Computational studies on scattering of radio frequency waves by density filaments in fusion plasmas”, Phys. Plasmas24, 102115 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    E. M. Kennaugh & R. L. Cosgriff, ”The use of impulse response in electromagnetic scattering problems”, IRE Natl. Conv. Rec., Part 1, 72- 77 (1958)

    work page 1958

  14. [14]

    E. M. Kennaugh & D. L. Moffatt, ”Transient and impulse response approximations”, Proc IEEE53, 893-901 (1965)

    work page 1965

  15. [15]

    C. L. Bennett, Jr. & W. L. Weeks, ”Transient scattering from conducting cylinders”, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat.,18, 627-633 (1970)

    work page 1970

  16. [16]

    J. Ma & I. R. Ciric, ”Transient response of a circular cylinder to an electromagnetic pulse”, Radio Science,27, 561-567 (1992). 15

    work page 1992

  17. [17]

    D. A. Vechinski & S. M. Rao, ”Transient scattering from dielectric cylinders: E-field, H-field, and combined field solutions”, Radio Science,

    work page

  18. [18]

    M. A. Nielson & I. Chuang,?Quantum Computation and Quantum Information,? Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (2000)

    work page 2000

  19. [19]

    N. D. Mermin, ?Quantum Computer Science,? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    A. K. Ram, E. Koukoutsis, G. Vahala, & K. Hizanidis, ”Mathematical Founda- tion for Quantum Computing of Electromagnetic Wave Propaga- tion in Dielectric Media,” in Emerging Applications of Ions and Plasmas, edited by S. K. Guharay and M. Wada, Springer Nature, New York (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Fowles, ”Introduction to modern optics”, (2nd ed.)

    G. Fowles, ”Introduction to modern optics”, (2nd ed.). Dover, New York, NY . 1989

    work page 1989

  22. [22]

    Zangwill, ”Modern Electrodynamics”, Cambridge Univ

    A. Zangwill, ”Modern Electrodynamics”, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cam- bridge, UK. 2012

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    Vahala, L

    G. Vahala, L. Vahala, M. Soe, & A. K. Ram, ”One- and two-dimensional quan- tum lattice algorithms for Maxwell equations in inhomogeneous scalar dielectric media I: Theory,”, Rad. Eff. Def. Solids176, 49-63, (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Vahala, M

    G. Vahala, M. Soe, L. Vahala, & A. K. Ram, ”One- and two-dimensional quan- tum lattice algorithms for Maxwell equations in inhomogeneous scalar dielectric media I: Simulations,”, Rad. Eff. Def. Solids176, 64- 72, (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    B. M. Boghosian & W. Taylor IV , ”A quantum lattice-gas model for the many-particle Schrodinger equation in d dimensions”, Phys. Rev.E57, 54?66 (1998)

    work page 1998

  26. [26]

    Yepez & B

    J. Yepez & B. Boghosian, ”An efficient and accurate quantum lattice-gas model for the many-body Schrodinger wave equation”, Computer Phys. Commun.146280-294 (2001)

    work page 2001

  27. [27]

    Yepez, ”Quantum lattice-gas model for Burgers’s equation”, J

    J. Yepez, ”Quantum lattice-gas model for Burgers’s equation”, J. Stat.Phys,107, 203-224 (2002)

    work page 2002

  28. [28]

    Vahala, L

    G. Vahala, L. Vahala, & J. Yepez, ”Quantum lattice gas representation of some classical solitons”, Phys. LettersA 310, 187?196 (2003)

    work page 2003

  29. [29]

    Vahala, L

    G. Vahala, L. Vahala, & J. Yepez, ”Inelastic vector soliton collisions: a lattice-based quantum representation”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences362 , 1677?1690 (2004)

    work page 2004

  30. [30]

    Vahala, L

    G. Vahala, L. Vahala, & J. Yepez, ”Quantum lattice representations for vector solitons in external potentials”, PhysicaA 362, 215?221 (2005)

    work page 2005

  31. [31]

    Yepez, G

    J. Yepez, G. Vahala, & L. Vahala, ”Vortex-antivortex pair in a Bose- Einstein condensate, Quantum lattice gas model ofϕ 4 theory in the mean- field approximation”, European Physical Journal Special Topics171, 9?14 (2009)

    work page 2009

  32. [32]

    Yepez, G

    J. Yepez, G. Vahala, L. Vahala, & M. Soe, ”Superfluid turbulence from quantum Kelvin waves to classical Kolmogorov cascades”, Phys. Rev. Letters103, 084501 (2009)

    work page 2009

  33. [33]

    Zhang, G

    B. Zhang, G. Vahala, L. Vahala, & M. Soe, ”Unitary quantum lattice algorithm for two dimensional quantum turbulence”, Phys. Rev.E 84, 046701 (2011)

    work page 2011

  34. [34]

    Vahala, J

    G. Vahala, J. Yepez, L. Vahala, M. Soe, B. Zhang, & S. Ziegeler, ”Poincare recurrence and spectral cascades in three-dimensional quan- tum turbulence”, Phys. Rev.E 84, 046713 (2011)

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    Vahala, J

    G. Vahala, J. Yepez, L. Vahala, & M. Soe, ”Unitary qubit lattice simulations of complex vortex structures”, Computat. Science Disc.5, 014013 (2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Vahala, B

    G. Vahala, B. Zhang, J. Yepez, L. Vahala, & M. Soe, ”Unitary qubit lattice gas representation of 2D and 3D quantum turbulence”, Advanced Fluid Dynamics, edited by H. W. Oh, Chapter 11, 239?272, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    Vahala, G

    L. Vahala, G. Vahala, M. Soe, A. K. Ram, & J. Yepez, ”Unitary qubit lattice algorithm for three-dimensional vortex solitons in hyperbolic self- defocusing media”, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation75, 152?159 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Vahala, M

    L. Vahala, M. Soe, G. Vahala & J. Yepez, ”Unitary qubit lattice algorithms for spin-1 Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs)”, Rad. Eff. Def. Solids174, 46?55 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Vahala, L

    G. Vahala, L. Vahala & M. Soe, ”Qubit unitary lattice algorithm for spin-2 Bose-Einstein condensates. I Theory and Pade initial conditions”, Rad. ff. Def. Solids175, 113-119 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Vahala, M

    G. Vahala, M. Soe & L. Vahala, ”Qubit unitary lattice algorithm for spin-2 Bose-Einstein condensates. II Vortex reconnection simulations and non-Abelian vortices”, Rad. Eff. Def. Solids175, 113-119 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Vahala, J

    G. Vahala, J. Hawthorne, L. Vahala, A. K. Ram, & M. Soe, ”Quantum lattice representation for the curl equations of Maxwell equations, Rad. Eff. Def. Solids177, 85?94 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Vahala, M

    G. Vahala, M. Soe, L. Vahala, A. K. Ram, E. Koukoutsis, & K. Hizanidis, ”Qubit lattice algorithm simulations of Maxwell?s equations for scattering from anisotropic dielectric objects”, Computers & Fluids 266, 106039 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Vahala, M

    G. Vahala, M. Soe, E. Koukoutsis, K. Hizanidis, L. Vahala, & A. K. Ram, ”Qubit lattice algorithms based on the Schrodinger-Dirac representation of Maxwell equations and their extensions”, Chapter 5 in Schrodinger Equation ? Fundamental Aspects and Potential Applications, eds. M. B. Tahir, M. Sagir, M. I. Khan, M. Rafique, and F. Bulnes, IntechOpen, Rijeka...

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Koukoutsis, K

    E. Koukoutsis, K. Hizanidis, G. Vahala, M. Soe, L. Vahala, & A. K. Ram, ”Quantum computing perspective for electromagnetic wave propagation in cold magnetized plasmas”’, Phys. Plasmas30, 122108 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Koukoutsis, K

    E. Koukoutsis, K. Hizanidis, A. K. Ram, & G. Vahala, ”Quantum simulation of dissipation for Maxwell equations in dispersive media”, Future Generation Com- puter Systems159, 221-229 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Koukoutsis, G

    E. Koukoutsis, G. Vahala, C. Tsironis, A. K. Ram, M. Soe, & L. Vahala, ”A quantum walk inspired qubit lattice algorithm for simulating electromagnetic wave propagation and scattering in conservative and dissipative magnetized plasmas”, arXiv:2503.24211v1, (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    [M. Soe, G. Vahala, L. Vahala, E. Koukoutsis, A. K. Ram, & K. Hizanidis, ”Qubit lattice algorithm simulations of the scattering of a bounded two dimensional electromagnetic pulse from an infinite planar dielectric interface”, AIP Advances16, 045015 (2026)

    work page 2026

  48. [48]

    M. Soe, G. Vahala, L. Vahala, E. Koukoutsis , A. K. Ram, & K. Hizanidis, ”Transient fields in oblique scattering from an infinite planar dielectric interface ? a qubit lattice simulation”, arXiv:2601.09135; accepted for publication in Rad. Eff. Defects Solids

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    A. M. Childs & N. Wiebe, ”Hamiltonian simulation using linear combinations of unitary operators”, Quantum Info. Comput.12, 901-924 (2012)

    work page 2012

  50. [50]

    V oronovich, ”Kirchhoff-tangent plane approximation”, in Wave Scat- tering from Rough Surfaces, Springer Series on Wave Phenomena, vol

    A. V oronovich, ”Kirchhoff-tangent plane approximation”, in Wave Scat- tering from Rough Surfaces, Springer Series on Wave Phenomena, vol

    work page

  51. [51]

    Spring, Berlin, Heidelberg. 1999

    work page 1999