pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21337 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.MA

PREVENT-JACK: Context Steering for Swarms of Long Heavy Articulated Vehicles

Adrian Baruck , Michael Dub\'e , Christoph Steup , Sanaz Mostaghim This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 21:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.MA
keywords swarm roboticsarticulated vehiclescontext steeringjackknifing preventiondecentralized coordinationdeadlock avoidancemulti-trailer vehiclesbehavior fusion
0
0 comments X

The pith

Prevent-Jack fuses six local behaviors into context steering that lets swarms of long articulated vehicles avoid jackknifing and collisions without central control.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends swarm robotics beyond point-mass robots to long heavy articulated vehicles that have multiple trailers and strict kinematic limits. These vehicles need local decentralized rules because global plans become impractical at scale. Prevent-Jack combines six simple behaviors to create guarantees that no vehicle will jackknife or collide with another. Extensive simulations with up to ten trailers and 15,000 runs show the system works but can produce deadlocks and livelocks, especially in larger or denser groups. One behavior in particular, Evade Attraction, proves essential for limiting deadlocks.

Core claim

Prevent-Jack introduces the sparsely covered context steering framework by fusing six local behaviors, providing guarantees against jackknifing and collisions for swarms of long heavy articulated vehicles with up to ten trailers at the cost of potential dead- and livelocks, as shown in simulations where larger swarms and denser scenarios increase waiting, evasion, and lock rates up to average peaks of 27 percent and 31 percent of vehicles.

What carries the argument

Context steering framework that fuses six local behaviors for decentralized coordination of kinematically constrained articulated vehicles.

If this is right

  • Swarms of multi-trailer vehicles can coordinate safely using only local information and no central planner.
  • Dead- and livelocks become more common as swarm size and density grow, peaking at 27 percent and 31 percent of vehicles.
  • Larger swarms produce more waiting while smaller swarms produce more evasion maneuvers.
  • The Evade Attraction behavior is required to keep deadlocks from rising sharply.
  • The approach remains effective for vehicles with as many as ten trailers in simulation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same local-behavior fusion could be tested on physical truck convoys or snake-like robots to check how sensor noise affects the claimed guarantees.
  • Adding a lightweight global recovery rule when a deadlock is detected might cut livelock rates while preserving reactivity.
  • Similar context steering might reduce collisions in other elongated systems such as flexible manufacturing chains or multi-link manipulators.

Load-bearing premise

The six local behaviors actually deliver guarantees against jackknifing and collisions when executed decentrally on vehicles with kinematic constraints.

What would settle it

A simulation run or physical test in which a vehicle jackknifes or collides while the six behaviors are active according to the framework.

read the original abstract

In this paper, we aim to extend the traditional point-mass-like robot representation in swarm robotics and instead study a swarm of long Heavy Articulated Vehicles (HAVs). HAVs are kinematically constrained, elongated, and articulated, introducing unique challenges. Local, decentralized coordination of these vehicles is motivated by many real-world applications. Our approach, Prevent-Jack, introduces the sparsely covered context steering framework in robotics. It fuses six local behaviors, providing guarantees against jackknifing and collisions at the cost of potential dead- and livelocks, tested for vehicles with up to ten trailers. We highlight the importance of the Evade Attraction behavior for deadlock prevention using a parameter study, and use 15,000 simulations to evaluate the swarm performance. Our extensive experiments and the results show that both the dead- and livelocks occur more frequently in larger swarms and denser scenarios, affecting a peak average of 27%/31% of vehicles. We observe that larger swarms exhibit increased waiting, while smaller swarms show increased evasion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces Prevent-Jack, a context-steering framework for decentralized swarms of heavy articulated vehicles (HAVs) with up to ten trailers. It fuses six local behaviors to provide guarantees against jackknifing and collisions (at the cost of potential dead- and livelocks), evaluated via 15,000 simulations showing increased dead-/livelock rates (peaks of 27%/31%) in larger and denser swarms, plus a parameter study on the Evade Attraction behavior.

Significance. If the empirical safety observations hold under broader conditions, the work would meaningfully extend swarm robotics to kinematically constrained, elongated articulated vehicles relevant to real-world heavy transport and logistics. The simulation-based trade-off analysis between safety and deadlock/livelock rates offers practical insights, though the absence of formal backing or baselines limits its theoretical contribution.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the six local behaviors 'provide guarantees against jackknifing and collisions' for decentralized execution on vehicles with up to ten trailers rests entirely on simulation observations (15,000 runs) without any derivation, kinematic model (articulation angles, trailer-chain dynamics), or proof that the rules close all reachable unsafe states.
  2. [Evaluation] Evaluation section: no baseline comparisons to existing decentralized swarm methods or alternative steering approaches are reported, and the manuscript provides no error analysis, simulation fidelity details, or explicit kinematic constraints, undermining assessment of the reported deadlock/livelock rates and their dependence on swarm size/density.
  3. [Parameter study] Parameter study: while the importance of the Evade Attraction behavior for deadlock prevention is asserted, the manuscript does not report quantitative outcomes (e.g., specific parameter values and resulting deadlock percentages) or how the study was conducted, limiting the ability to reproduce or generalize the finding.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'sparsely covered context steering framework' is used without definition or citation to prior context-steering literature, leaving unclear what is novel versus extended.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from briefly naming or characterizing the six local behaviors to give readers immediate context before the simulation results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to clarify claims, add methodological details, and improve reporting for better reproducibility and assessment.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the six local behaviors 'provide guarantees against jackknifing and collisions' for decentralized execution on vehicles with up to ten trailers rests entirely on simulation observations (15,000 runs) without any derivation, kinematic model (articulation angles, trailer-chain dynamics), or proof that the rules close all reachable unsafe states.

    Authors: We agree that the phrasing 'provide guarantees' may imply formal assurance or proof, which our work does not include. The safety properties are demonstrated empirically via 15,000 simulations rather than through analytical derivation or exhaustive state-space proof. In the revised manuscript, we will update the abstract and introduction to state that the behaviors 'empirically demonstrate avoidance' of jackknifing and collisions in the evaluated scenarios. We will also expand the methods section with additional details on the kinematic model, including articulation angles and trailer-chain dynamics as implemented in the simulations. A complete formal proof remains beyond the scope of this study due to the complexity of the high-dimensional state space. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Evaluation] Evaluation section: no baseline comparisons to existing decentralized swarm methods or alternative steering approaches are reported, and the manuscript provides no error analysis, simulation fidelity details, or explicit kinematic constraints, undermining assessment of the reported deadlock/livelock rates and their dependence on swarm size/density.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of baselines and detailed evaluation information. Most prior decentralized swarm approaches assume simpler robot kinematics without multi-trailer articulations, rendering direct comparisons non-trivial without altering their core behaviors. We will add a discussion subsection explaining this limitation and our focus on the proposed method. We will also revise the evaluation section to include explicit kinematic constraints, simulation fidelity details (e.g., model assumptions and discretization), and error analysis such as variability measures for deadlock/livelock rates to better support assessment of dependence on swarm size and density. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Parameter study] Parameter study: while the importance of the Evade Attraction behavior for deadlock prevention is asserted, the manuscript does not report quantitative outcomes (e.g., specific parameter values and resulting deadlock percentages) or how the study was conducted, limiting the ability to reproduce or generalize the finding.

    Authors: We apologize for the lack of quantitative detail and procedural description in the parameter study. We will revise this section to report the specific parameter values tested for the Evade Attraction behavior along with the resulting deadlock and livelock percentages from the simulations. We will also provide a clear description of the study methodology, including the parameter ranges, number of runs, and swarm configurations used, to enable reproduction and generalization. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on independent behavioral definitions and simulation validation

full rationale

The paper defines six local behaviors (with emphasis on Evade Attraction) as independent rules for context steering, then reports empirical outcomes from 15,000 simulations on vehicles up to ten trailers. No equations, parameter fits, self-citations, or uniqueness theorems are invoked that would make the safety guarantees or performance metrics equivalent to the inputs by construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to renaming, fitting, or self-referential justification.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Based on abstract only; the approach rests on the unstated assumption that local rules suffice for global safety in articulated systems, with no explicit free parameters, axioms, or new entities detailed.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Local decentralized behaviors can provide collision and jackknifing avoidance guarantees for kinematically constrained vehicles
    Invoked by the claim of guarantees without central control or global knowledge.
invented entities (1)
  • Prevent-Jack context steering framework no independent evidence
    purpose: To fuse six local behaviors for HAV swarm coordination
    Introduced as a sparsely covered framework in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5491 in / 1446 out tokens · 36882 ms · 2026-05-09T21:51:49.527145+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In: 2025 IEEE Inter- national Symposium on Multi-Robot and Multi-Agent Systems (MRS)

    Sch¨ onnagel, A., Dub´ e, M., Steup, C., Keppler, F. & Mostaghim, S. IEEE (ed.)Avoid-jack: Avoidance of jackknifing for swarms of long heavy articu- lated vehicles. (ed.IEEE)2025 IEEE International Symposium on Multi-Robot and Multi-Agent Systems (MRS), 1–7 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ MRS66243.2025.11357246

    work page arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    inContext Steering: Behavior-Driven Steering at the Macro Scale (ed.360, G

    Fray, A. inContext Steering: Behavior-Driven Steering at the Macro Scale (ed.360, G. A. P.)Game AI Pro 360: Guide to Movement and Pathfinding (CRC Press, 2019). URL https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/ 9780429055096-14/context-steering-andrew-fray

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    & Seleck´ y, M

    ˇC´ ap, M., Nov´ ak, P., Kleiner, A. & Seleck´ y, M. Prioritized Planning Algorithms for Trajectory Coordination of Multiple Mobile Robots.IEEE Transactions on 28 Automation Science and Engineering12, 835–849 (2015). URL https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TASE.2015.2445780

    work page doi:10.1109/tase.2015.2445780 2015

  4. [4]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1609/ socs.v10i1.18510

    Stern, R.et al.Multi-Agent Pathfinding: Definitions, Variants, and Benchmarks. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search10, 151– 158 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1609/socs.v10i1.18510

    work page doi:10.1609/socs.v10i1.18510 2019

  5. [5]

    & Wagner, S

    Keppler, F. & Wagner, S. IEEE (ed.)Prioritized Multi-Robot Velocity Planning for Trajectory Coordination of Arbitrarily Complex Vehicle Structures. (ed.IEEE) 2020 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), 1075– 1080 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1109/SII46433.2020.9026256

    work page doi:10.1109/sii46433.2020.9026256 2020

  6. [6]

    & Zucker, S

    Kant, K. & Zucker, S. W. Toward Efficient Trajectory Planning: The Path- Velocity Decomposition.The International Journal of Robotics Research5, 72–89 (1986). URL https://doi.org/10.1177/027836498600500304

    work page doi:10.1177/027836498600500304 1986

  7. [7]

    Meeting-merging-mission: A multi- robot coordinate framework for large-scale communication-limited exploration

    Kottinger, J., Almagor, S. & Lahijanian, M. IEEE (ed.)Conflict-based search for multi-robot motion planning with kinodynamic constraints. (ed.IEEE)2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 13494–13499 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS47612.2022.9982018

    work page doi:10.1109/iros47612.2022.9982018 2022

  8. [8]

    & Xia, Y

    Dai, L., Hao, Y., Xie, H., Sun, Z. & Xia, Y. Distributed robust MPC for non- holonomic robots with obstacle and collision avoidance.Control Theory and Technology20, 32–45 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-022-00079-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s11768-022-00079-x 2022

  9. [9]

    & Silvestre, D

    Louren¸ co, B. & Silvestre, D. Enhancing truck platooning efficiency and safety—A distributed Model Predictive Control approach for lane-changing manoeuvres. Control Engineering Practice154, 106153 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.conengprac.2024.106153

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    & Ding, Z

    Jin, Z., Wang, C., Liang, D., Wang, S. & Ding, Z. Fixed-time consensus for multiple tractor-trailer vehicles with dynamics control: A distributed internal model approach.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles9, 656–669 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2023.3338238

    work page doi:10.1109/tiv.2023.3338238 2024

  11. [11]

    & Manocha, D

    van den Berg, J., Lin, M. & Manocha, D. IEEE (ed.)Reciprocal velocity obstacles for real-time multi-agent navigation. (ed.IEEE)2008 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1928–1935 (2008). URL https: //doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2008.4543489

    work page doi:10.1109/robot.2008.4543489 2008

  12. [12]

    J., Lin, M

    van den Berg, J., Guy, S. J., Lin, M. & Manocha, D. Pradalier, C., Siegwart, R. & Hirzinger, G. (eds)Reciprocal n-body collision avoidance. (eds Pradalier, C., Siegwart, R. & Hirzinger, G.)Robotics Research, 3–19 (Springer Berlin Hei- delberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011). URL https://link.springer.com/chapter/10. 1007/978-3-642-19457-3 1. 29

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    & Siegwart, R

    Alonso-Mora, J., Breitenmoser, A., Rufli, M., Beardsley, P. & Siegwart, R. inOptimal Reciprocal Collision Avoidance for Multiple Non-Holonomic Robots (eds Martinoli, A.et al.)Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems: The 10th International Symposium203–216 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32723-0 15

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32723-0 2013

  14. [14]

    & Siegwart, R

    Rufli, M., Alonso-Mora, J. & Siegwart, R. Reciprocal Collision Avoidance With Motion Continuity Constraints.IEEE Transactions on Robotics29, 899–912 (2013). URL https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2013.2258733

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2013.2258733 2013

  15. [15]

    & van den Berg, J

    Bareiss, D. & van den Berg, J. Generalized reciprocal collision avoidance.The International Journal of Robotics Research34, 1501–1514 (2015). URL https: //doi.org/10.1177/0278364915576234

    work page doi:10.1177/0278364915576234 2015

  16. [16]

    & Guo, L

    Mao, R., Gao, H. & Guo, L. A novel collision-free navigation approach for multiple nonholonomic robots based on orca and linear mpc.Mathematical Problems in Engineering2020, 4183427 (2020). URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ abs/10.1155/2020/4183427

    work page doi:10.1155/2020/4183427 2020

  17. [17]

    2023.10342437

    Bone, S., Bartolomei, L., Kennel-Maushart, F. & Chli, M. IEEE (ed.)Decen- tralised multi-robot exploration using monte carlo tree search. (ed.IEEE) 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 7354–7361 (IEEE, 2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS55552. 2023.10341485

    work page doi:10.1109/iros55552 2023

  18. [18]

    & Rohlfshagen, P

    Perez, D., Samothrakis, S., Lucas, S. & Rohlfshagen, P. ACM (ed.)Rolling hori- zon evolution versus tree search for navigation in single-player real-time games. (ed.ACM)Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolution- ary Computation, GECCO ’13, 351–358 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2013). URL https://doi.org/...

    work page doi:10.1145/2463372.2463413 2013

  19. [19]

    D., Devlin, S., Lucas, S

    Gaina, R. D., Devlin, S., Lucas, S. M. & Perez-Liebana, D. Rolling horizon evolutionary algorithms for general video game playing.IEEE Transactions on Games14, 232–242 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1109/TG.2021.3060282

    work page doi:10.1109/tg.2021.3060282 2022

  20. [20]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74528-2

    Hamann, H.Swarm Robotics: A Formal Approach(Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74528-2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74528-2 2018

  21. [21]

    Dias, P. G. F.et al.Swarm Robotics: A Perspective on the Latest Reviewed Concepts and Applications.Sensors21, 2062 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10. 3390/s21062062

    work page 2062

  22. [22]

    P.Fundamentals of Computational Swarm Intelligence(John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006)

    Engelbrecht, A. P.Fundamentals of Computational Swarm Intelligence(John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006)

    work page 2006

  23. [23]

    A., Vanualailai, J

    Kumar, S. A., Vanualailai, J. & Sharma, B. Lyapunov-Based Control for a Swarm of Planar Nonholonomic Vehicles.Math.Comput.Sci.9, 461–475 (2015). URL 30 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11786-015-0243-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s11786-015-0243-z 2015

  24. [24]

    maximum turning rate

    Hauert, S.et al.IEEE (ed.)Reynolds flocking in reality with fixed-wing robots: Communication range vs. maximum turning rate. (ed.IEEE)2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 5015–5020 (2011). URL https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2011.6095129

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2011.6095129 2011

  25. [25]

    Master’s thesis, OVGU Magdeburg (2018)

    Stein, A.Multikriteriell optimiertes Context Steering f¨ ur autonome Bewegung im Gebiet der Schwarmrobotik. Master’s thesis, OVGU Magdeburg (2018). URL https://ci.ovgu.de/is media/Master+und+Bachelor Arbeiten+/MAStein.pdf

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Master’s thesis, OVGU Magdeburg (2021)

    Thoms, P.Anwendung von dreidimensionalem Context-Steering auf Quadcopter-Schw¨ arme. Master’s thesis, OVGU Magdeburg (2021). URL https://www.ci.ovgu.de/is media/Master+und+Bachelor Arbeiten+ /Master PhilippThoms pdf-p-7562.pdf

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Sliding mode controller for autonomous tractor-trailer vehicle reverse path tracking.Applied Sciences13(2023)

    Bin Salamah, Y. Sliding mode controller for autonomous tractor-trailer vehicle reverse path tracking.Applied Sciences13(2023). URL https://doi.org/10.3390/ app132111998

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    IEEE (ed.)Conversion of the kinematics of a car with n trailers into a chained form

    Sordalen, O. IEEE (ed.)Conversion of the kinematics of a car with n trailers into a chained form. (ed.IEEE)[1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 382–387 vol.1 (1993). URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ ROBOT.1993.292011

    work page arXiv 1993

  29. [29]

    Soemers, and Cameron Browne

    Dockhorn, A., Mostaghim, S., Kirst, M. & Zettwitz, M. IEEE (ed.)Multi- Objective Optimization and Decision-Making in Context Steering. (ed.IEEE) 2021 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), 1–8 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10. 1109/CoG52621.2021.9619155

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Bird, J., Blumenkamp, J. & Prorok, A. IEEE (ed.)Dvm-slam: Decentralized visual monocular simultaneous localization and mapping for multi-agent systems. (ed.IEEE)2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 1–7 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA55743.2025.11127510

    work page doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11127510 2025

  31. [31]

    & Beltrame, G

    Lajoie, P.-Y. & Beltrame, G. Swarm-slam: Sparse decentralized collaborative simultaneous localization and mapping framework for multi-robot systems.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters9, 475–482 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10. 1109/LRA.2023.3333742

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    & Saska, M

    Horyna, J., Walter, V. & Saska, M. ICUAS (ed.)Uvdar-com: Uv-based relative localization of uavs with integrated optical communication. (ed.ICUAS)2022 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 1302–1308 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS54217.2022.9836151

    work page doi:10.1109/icuas54217.2022.9836151 2022

  33. [33]

    & Saska, M

    Walter, V., Staub, N., Franchi, A. & Saska, M. Uvdar system for visual relative localization with application to leader–follower formations of multirotor uavs. 31 IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters4, 2637–2644 (2019). URL https://doi. org/10.1109/LRA.2019.2901683

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2019.2901683 2019

  34. [34]

    Dubins, L. E. On Curves of Minimal Length with a Constraint on Average Curvature, and with Prescribed Initial and Terminal Positions and Tangents. American Journal of Mathematics79, 497–516 (1957). URL https://doi.org/10. 2307/2372560

    work page 1957

  35. [35]

    Snider, J. M. Automatic steering methods for autonomous automobile path track- ing.Robotics Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, Tech. Rep. CMU-RITR-09-08(2009). URL https://publications.ri.cmu.edu/storage/publications/pub files/2009/2/ Automatic Steering Methods for Autonomous Automobile Path Tracking.pdf

    work page 2009

  36. [36]

    Slocum gliders: Robust and ready.Journal of Field Robotics, 24(6):473–485, 2007

    Thrun, S.et al.Stanley: The robot that won the DARPA Grand Challenge. Journal of Field Robotics23, 661–692 (2006). URL https://doi.org/10.1002/rob. 20147

    work page doi:10.1002/rob 2006

  37. [37]

    Supplementary material for ”PREVENT-JACK: Context Steering for Swarms of Long Heavy Articulated Vehicles” (2025)

    Sch¨ onnagel, Adrian and Steup, Christoph and Dube, Michael and Keppler, Felix and Mostaghim, Sanaz. Supplementary material for ”PREVENT-JACK: Context Steering for Swarms of Long Heavy Articulated Vehicles” (2025). URL https: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17650869

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17650869 2025

  38. [38]

    The first passage probl em for a continuous Markov pro- cess

    Rosenblatt, M. Remarks on Some Nonparametric Estimates of a Density Func- tion.The Annals of Mathematical Statistics27, 832 – 837 (1956). URL https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728190

    work page doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728190 1956

  39. [39]

    Lamperti

    Parzen, E. On Estimation of a Probability Density Function and Mode.The Annals of Mathematical Statistics33, 1065 – 1076 (1962). URL https://doi.org/ 10.1214/aoms/1177704472. 32

    work page doi:10.1214/aoms/1177704472 1962