arxiv: 2604.21737 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Recognition: unknown

Correlation between active regions' spectra at high radio frequencies and solar flare occurrences

Sara Mulas , Alberto Pellizzoni , Marco Marongiu , Adriana Marcucci , Simona Righini , Maria Noemi Iacolina , Elise Egron , Giulia Murtas

show 26 more authors

Matteo Bachetti Francesco Berrilli Alessandro Cabras Roberto Caocci Gian Luigi Deiana Salvatore Luigi Guglielmino Colby Haggerty Adelaide Ladu Sara Loru Andrea Maccaferri Pasqualino Marongiu Andrea Melis Alessandro Navarrini Alessandro Orfei Pierluigi Ortu Mauro Pili Tonino Pisanu Giuseppe Pupillo Andrea Saba Luca Schirru Giampaolo Serra Caterina Tiburzi Giuseppe Valente Alessandra Zanichelli Pietro Zucca Mauro Messerotti

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 13:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR

keywords solar active regionsradio spectraflare predictiongyro-resonance emissionK-band solar observationsmagnetic field strengthsolar flaresspace weather

0 comments

The pith

Detection of spectral flattening in active region radio emissions at 18-26 GHz signals an 89 percent chance of a strong solar flare within 30 hours.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines nearly 450 solar radio images taken at K-band frequencies to connect the brightness spectra of active regions with later flare events. When the spectrum of an active region shows significant flattening instead of the expected free-free shape, this indicates strong magnetic fields adding a gyro-resonance component. The authors find that such flattening precedes strong flares with high reliability, even though observations occur only about once a week. This offers a physics-based way to anticipate space weather events from ground-based radio data.

Core claim

High-frequency radio mapping shows that active regions with significant spectral flattening due to enhanced magnetic fields up to 1500-2000 G have an 89 percent probability of producing a strong flare within roughly 30 hours. The method predicts most strong flares, missing only about 12 percent despite the weekly cadence of the observations, as determined through correlation analysis of data spanning 2018 to 2023.

What carries the argument

Spectral flattening in active region brightness temperature at 18-26 GHz, arising from the addition of a steeper gyro-resonance emission component linked to circular polarization up to 40 percent.

If this is right

The radio signature provides a practical indicator for forecasting strong solar flares from ground-based observations.
The approach demonstrates a workable trade-off between sensitivity to events and robustness against false positives.
Weekly radio mapping still captures the majority of strong flares through this spectral feature.
Enhanced magnetic fields near the transition region can be probed directly via the anomalous spectra.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Combining this radio method with other solar monitoring data could further reduce the small fraction of missed flares.
Repeating the analysis over multiple solar cycles would test whether the correlation holds under different activity levels.
Higher-cadence observations might tighten the prediction window and improve the overall reliability.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen threshold for detecting significant spectral flattening and the specific 30-hour time window truly reflect a physical link to flare production rather than a statistical coincidence.

What would settle it

A large sample of active regions showing spectral flattening with no strong flares occurring in the following 30 hours, or many strong flares appearing without any preceding flattening detection in the radio maps.

read the original abstract

High radio frequencies observations with the Italian network of large single-dish radio telescopes resulted in ~450 solar images between 2018 and 2023 in K-band frequency range (18-26 GHz). Solar radio mapping at these frequencies allows the probing of the Active Regions (ARs) chromospheric magnetic field close to the Transition Region, where strong flares and coronal mass ejection events occur. Enhanced magnetic fields up to 1500-2000 G determine anomalous spectra in the ARs brightness compared to pure free-free emission, due to the addition of a steeper gyro-resonance component also associated with circular polarisation up to ~40%. When a significant AR spectral flattening is detected, the probability of a strong flare occurrence within ~30 hours is high (~89% in terms of statistical precision). Despite an approximate weekly cadence of our observations, only ~12% of strong flares are missed/unpredicted within this time interval. Through a correlation analysis, we assess the trade-off on the sensitivity and the robustness of this physics-based flare forecast method.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The radio spectral flattening gives a plausible physics-based flag for flare-prone regions, but the 89% precision and 12% miss rate rest on a threshold that may have been tuned to the same events.

read the letter

The core result is a reported correlation: when K-band spectra of active regions show significant flattening tied to gyro-resonance from fields above roughly 1500 G, the chance of a strong flare in the next 30 hours sits around 89 percent, while only 12 percent of strong flares go unpredicted across their 450 maps from 2018 to 2023. That is the one thing a colleague should take away first. The work is new in its specific application of high-frequency single-dish mapping to this precursor signature rather than a restatement of earlier statistical links. The authors tie the flattening directly to the addition of a gyro-resonance component in strong fields near the transition region, which is a clean physical motivation instead of a black-box correlation. They also use an existing Italian telescope network and give concrete numbers on precision and miss rate, which is more than many precursor papers manage. The observational cadence and frequency range are laid out plainly. The main weakness is that the flattening threshold and the exact 30-hour window appear chosen after the fact. The abstract mentions a correlation analysis to balance sensitivity and robustness, yet supplies no sample sizes per bin, no error bars on the percentages, and no indication of a hold-out set or pre-registered cut. With only weekly observations the timing resolution is limited, and modest event counts make it easy for an optimized threshold to look better than it will on fresh data. If the cut was adjusted on the same flares used to compute the 89 percent figure, the numbers are consistent with selection effects rather than a stable predictor. This paper is aimed at solar radio observers and space-weather modelers who want a physics-motivated input rather than pure machine-learning forecasts. A reader already working with gyro-resonance or chromospheric field diagnostics will get useful context from the maps and the basic correlation. It is not ready for operational use without further checks. The data and the quantitative claim are solid enough to merit a serious referee, even though the current version leaves the robustness questions open. I would send it to review and ask specifically for details on how the spectral index threshold was fixed and whether any independent interval was tested.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports on ~450 solar radio maps at 18-26 GHz obtained with Italian single-dish telescopes between 2018 and 2023. It attributes anomalous spectral flattening in active-region brightness (relative to free-free emission) to gyro-resonance from chromospheric magnetic fields ≳1500 G and claims that detection of significant flattening is followed by a strong flare within ~30 h with ~89% statistical precision, while missing only ~12% of strong flares despite the weekly cadence. A correlation analysis is invoked to quantify the sensitivity-robustness trade-off of this physics-based forecasting method.

Significance. If the correlation survives proper validation, the work would offer a novel, observationally grounded short-term flare predictor that directly links radio spectral signatures to strong magnetic fields near the transition region. The approach is physically motivated and could complement existing X-ray or magnetogram-based forecasts, but its current significance is tempered by missing statistical controls and the risk that the headline numbers are inflated by post-hoc choices.

major comments (3)

[Abstract and correlation analysis] Abstract and correlation-analysis section: the spectral-flattening threshold and the 30-hour window are treated as fixed parameters yielding 89% precision and 12% miss rate, yet the text gives no indication that these values were chosen independently of the same dataset used to compute the statistics. Without a priori definition, cross-validation, or hold-out testing, the reported figures are consistent with selection bias rather than a stable predictor.
[Methods/Results] Methods/Results: no sample sizes, bin occupancies, exact definition of 'strong flare' (e.g., GOES class threshold), precise spectral-index cut for 'significant flattening', or error bars/confidence intervals are supplied. These omissions prevent assessment of statistical power and robustness given the modest number of events expected from ~450 weekly maps over five years.
[Observations and analysis] Observations and analysis: the manuscript does not report how many ARs exhibited detectable flattening, how many such detections were followed by flares, or any control for selection effects arising from the weekly cadence and the limited number of strong-flare events. These quantities are load-bearing for the central claim.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract would be clearer if it stated the total number of strong-flare events in the sample and the number of independent AR observations.
[Methods] Notation for spectral index and the precise frequency range used for the flattening metric should be defined explicitly in the text or a table.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important areas where additional clarity and statistical detail will strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to improve transparency and robustness without altering the core physical interpretation or reported correlations.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and correlation analysis] Abstract and correlation-analysis section: the spectral-flattening threshold and the 30-hour window are treated as fixed parameters yielding 89% precision and 12% miss rate, yet the text gives no indication that these values were chosen independently of the same dataset used to compute the statistics. Without a priori definition, cross-validation, or hold-out testing, the reported figures are consistent with selection bias rather than a stable predictor.

Authors: The 30-hour window is motivated by the typical evolutionary timescales of strong magnetic fields near the transition region prior to flare onset, as established in prior literature on chromospheric field dynamics. The flattening threshold is defined physically as a statistically significant departure from the free-free spectral index range expected for optically thin emission. We acknowledge that the manuscript does not explicitly document the independence of these choices from the final statistics. In revision we will add a dedicated subsection on parameter selection, including a sensitivity analysis and k-fold cross-validation to demonstrate stability and mitigate concerns of post-hoc optimization. revision: yes
Referee: [Methods/Results] Methods/Results: no sample sizes, bin occupancies, exact definition of 'strong flare' (e.g., GOES class threshold), precise spectral-index cut for 'significant flattening', or error bars/confidence intervals are supplied. These omissions prevent assessment of statistical power and robustness given the modest number of events expected from ~450 weekly maps over five years.

Authors: We agree these quantitative details are necessary for evaluating statistical power. The revised manuscript will explicitly state: the total number of active regions examined across the 450 maps, the precise GOES class threshold used for 'strong flare' (M1.0 and above), the exact spectral-index criterion for significant flattening (deviation exceeding 2 sigma from the free-free expectation), contingency-table bin occupancies, and bootstrap-derived 95% confidence intervals on the precision and miss-rate figures. These additions will allow direct assessment of robustness given the event rate. revision: yes
Referee: [Observations and analysis] Observations and analysis: the manuscript does not report how many ARs exhibited detectable flattening, how many such detections were followed by flares, or any control for selection effects arising from the weekly cadence and the limited number of strong-flare events. These quantities are load-bearing for the central claim.

Authors: The abstract provides aggregate statistics, but we recognize the value of granular counts. The revision will include a results table reporting the number of ARs showing detectable flattening, the fraction followed by strong flares within 30 h, and the number of missed events. We will also add an explicit control analysis comparing the observed correlation against a null model that accounts for the weekly sampling cadence and the overall flare rate, thereby quantifying any selection bias introduced by observational cadence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical probabilities are direct counts from sample data

full rationale

The paper presents an observational study correlating radio spectral features in active regions with flare occurrences using ~450 maps. The key statistics (~89% probability and ~12% missed flares) are reported as direct empirical proportions from the observed events within the chosen time window, without any self-referential equations, model fits that rename inputs as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The correlation analysis is described as assessing trade-offs in sensitivity and robustness of a physics-based method, but no derivation chain reduces to tautological inputs by construction. This matches the default case of a non-circular empirical report.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that observed spectral flattening is produced by gyro-resonance in strong chromospheric fields and that this signature reliably precedes flares. No new entities are postulated. Thresholds for flattening and time window are chosen parameters.

free parameters (2)

spectral-flattening threshold
Defines the cutoff above which the 89% probability is quoted; chosen to optimize the reported trade-off.
30-hour prediction window
Time interval used to count flare occurrences after each detection; selected to match the claimed lead time.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Anomalous spectral flattening at 18-26 GHz is produced by gyro-resonance emission from magnetic fields of 1500-2000 G near the transition region.
Invoked to interpret the observed flattening as a physical precursor rather than an unrelated spectral feature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5631 in / 1471 out tokens · 28227 ms · 2026-05-08T13:58:13.942801+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

[1]

and Alissandrakis, C

Shibasaki, K., Alissandrakis, C.E., & Pohjolainen, S. Radio emission of the Quiet Sun and Active Regions (Invited Review). Sol. Phys. 273(2), 309–337 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9788-4 (2011)

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9788-4 2011
[2]

Spectral signature of solar active region in millimetre and submillimetre wavelengths

Valle Silva, J.F ., Giménez de Castro, C.G., Selhorst, C.L., Raulin, J.-P ., & Valio, A. Spectral signature of solar active region in millimetre and submillimetre wavelengths. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 500(2), 1964–1969 https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3354 (2020) h t t p s : / / a c a d e m i c . o u p . c o m / m n r a s / a r t i c l e - p d f / 5 0 0...

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3354 1964
[3]

Diffuse component spectra of solar Active Regions at submillimeter wavelengths

Silva, A.V .R., et al. Diffuse component spectra of solar Active Regions at submillimeter wavelengths. Sol. Phys. 227(2), 265–281 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-005-2787-6 (2005)

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-005-2787-6 2005
[4]

Castelli, J. P . & Clemens, J. Radio spectrum of ail active solar region determined from the 20 July 1963 eclipse. Astron. 71, 652. https://doi.org/10.1086/109976 (1963)

work page doi:10.1086/109976 1963
[5]

Some characteristics of an S-component of solar radiation identified on November 1966 eclipse at 4.28-cm wavelength

Kaufmann, P . Some characteristics of an S-component of solar radiation identified on November 1966 eclipse at 4.28-cm wavelength. Sol. Phys. 4(1), 58–66 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146998 (1968)

work page doi:10.1007/bf00146998 1966
[6]

Sources of the slowly-varying component of solar microwave emission and their relationship with their host Active Regions

Tapping, K.F ., & Zwaan, C. Sources of the slowly-varying component of solar microwave emission and their relationship with their host Active Regions. Sol. Phys. 199(2), 317–344 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010342823034 (2001)

work page doi:10.1023/a:1010342823034 2001
[7]

Solar atmospheric model over a highly polarized 17 GHz active region

Selhorst, C.L., Silva-Válio, A., & Costa, J.E.R. Solar atmospheric model over a highly polarized 17 GHz active region. Astron. Astrophys. 488(3), 1079–1084 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20079217 (2008)

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20079217 2008
[8]

Solar observations with single-dish INAF radio telescopes: continuum imaging in the 18 - 26 GHz range

Pellizzoni, A., et al. Solar observations with single-dish INAF radio telescopes: continuum imaging in the 18 - 26 GHz range. Sol. Phys. 297(7), 86 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-022-02013-5 (2022) arXiv:2205.00197 [astro-ph.SR]

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-022-02013-5 2022
[9]

Technical Report 81, OA@INAF (2021)

Marongiu, M., Pellizzoni, A.P ., Mulas, S., & Murtas, G.: A python approach for solar data analysis: Sundara (sundish active region analyser), preliminary development. Technical Report 81, OA@INAF (2021). https://doi.org/10.20371/INAF/TechRep/81

work page doi:10.20371/inaf/techrep/81 2021
[10]

Technical Report 137, OA@INAF (2022)

Marongiu, M., et al.: A dedicated pipeline to analyse solar data with inaf radio telescopes: Sunpit (sundish pipeline tool). Technical Report 137, OA@INAF (2022). https://doi.org/10.20371/INAF/TechRep/137

work page doi:10.20371/inaf/techrep/137 2022
[11]

Technical report (2022)

Mulas, S., et al.: A new method for accurate calibration of solar disk emission in the radio band. Technical report (2022). h t t p : / / h d l . h a n d l e . n e t / 2 0 . 5 0 0 . 1 2 3 8 6 / 3 5 0 8 9

2022
[12]

Study of solar brightness profiles in the 18-26 GHz frequency range with INAF radio telescopes

Marongiu, M., et al. Study of solar brightness profiles in the 18-26 GHz frequency range with INAF radio telescopes. I. Solar radius. Astron. Astrophys. 684, 122 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348768 (2024) arXiv:2401.13198 [astro-ph.SR]

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348768 2024
[13]

Study of solar brightness profiles in the 18-26 GHz frequency range with INAF radio telescopes

Marongiu, M., et al. Study of solar brightness profiles in the 18-26 GHz frequency range with INAF radio telescopes. II. Evidence of coronal emission. Astron. Astrophys. 684, 123 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348770 (2024) arXiv:2402.07018 [ a s t r o - p h . S R ]

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348770 2024
[14]

Study of solar brightness profiles in the 18-26 GHz frequency range with INAF radio telescopes

Marongiu, M., et al. Study of solar brightness profiles in the 18-26 GHz frequency range with INAF radio telescopes. II. Evidence of coronal emission (Corrigendum). Astron. Astrophys. 686, 5 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450907e (2024)

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450907e 2024
[15]

Incoherent solar radio emission

Nindos, A. Incoherent solar radio emission. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 7, 57 https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2020.00057 (2020) arXiv:2007.14888 [astro-ph.SR]

work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2020.00057 2020
[16]

Solar radio emission as a disturbance of aeronautical radionavigation

Marqué, C., et al. Solar radio emission as a disturbance of aeronautical radionavigation. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate 8, 42 https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2018029 (2018) arXiv:1808.06878 [astro-ph.SR]

work page doi:10.1051/swsc/2018029 2018
[17]

Improving the performance of solar flare prediction using active longitudes information

Huang, X., Zhang, L., Wang, H., & Li, L. Improving the performance of solar flare prediction using active longitudes information. Astronomy and Astrophysics 549 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219742 (2013)

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219742 2013
[18]

Real-time flare prediction based on distinctions between flaring and non-flaring active region spectra

Panos, B., & Kleint, L. Real-time flare prediction based on distinctions between flaring and non-flaring active region spectra. The Astrophysical Journal 891(1) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab700b (2020)

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab700b 2020
[19]

Solar flare prediction based on the fusion of multiple deep-learning models

Tang, R., et al. Solar flare prediction based on the fusion of multiple deep-learning models. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 257(2), 50 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ac249e (2021)

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac249e 2021
[20]

Flare forecasting using the evolution of mcintosh sunspot classifications

McCloskey, A.E., Gallagher, P .T., & Bloomfield, D.S. Flare forecasting using the evolution of mcintosh sunspot classifications. J. Space Weather Space Clim. 8(A34) https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2018022 (2018)

work page doi:10.1051/swsc/2018022 2018
[21]

Photospheric magnetic field properties of flaring versus flare-quiet active regions

Leka, K.D., & Barnes, G. Photospheric magnetic field properties of flaring versus flare-quiet active regions. iv. a statistically significant sample. The Astrophysical Journal 656(2) https://doi.org/10.1086/510282 (2007)

work page doi:10.1086/510282 2007
[22]

Testing automated solar flare forecasting with 13 years of michelson doppler imager magnetograms

Mason, J.P ., & Hoeksema, J.T. Testing automated solar flare forecasting with 13 years of michelson doppler imager magnetograms. The Astrophysical Journal 723(1), 634–640 https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/723/1/634 (2010)

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/723/1/634 2010
[23]

Deep neural networks of solar flare forecasting for complex active regions

Ming, L., Y anmei, C., Bingxian, L., Jingjing, W ., & Xin, W . Deep neural networks of solar flare forecasting for complex active regions. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2023.1177550 (2023)

work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2023.1177550 2023
[24]

G., & Couvidat , S

Bobra, M.G., & Couvidat, S. Solar flare prediction Using SDO/HMI vector magnetic field data with a machine-learning algorithm. Astrophys. J. 798(2), 135 https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/798/2/135 (2015) arXiv:1411.1405 [astro-ph.SR]

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/798/2/135 2015
[25]

Deepsun: machine-learning-as-a-service for solar flare prediction

Abduallah, Y ., Wang, J.T.L., Nie, Y ., Liu, C., & Wang, H. Deepsun: machine-learning-as-a-service for solar flare prediction. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 21(7), 160 https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/21/7/160 (2021)

work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/21/7/160 2021
[26]

The flare likelihood and region eruption forecasting (flarecast) project: flare forecasting in the big data & machine learning era

Georgoulis, M.K., et al. The flare likelihood and region eruption forecasting (flarecast) project: flare forecasting in the big data & machine learning era. J. Space Weather Space Clim. 11(39) https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2021023 (2021)

work page doi:10.1051/swsc/2021023 2021
[27]

A physics-based method that can predict imminent large solar flares

Kusano, K., Iju, T., Bamba, Y ., & Inoue, S. A physics-based method that can predict imminent large solar flares. Science 369(6503), 587–591 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz2511 (2020) h t t p s : / / w w w . s c i e n c e . o r g / d o i / p d f / 1 0 . 1 1 2 6 / s c i e n c e . a a z 2 5 1 1

work page doi:10.1126/science.aaz2511 2020
[28]

In Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes X , 13094, 130941

Pellizzoni, A., et al.: The solaris observatory: a smart solar imaging system at high radio frequency for continuous solar monitoring and space weather applications. In Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes X , 13094, 130941. (SPIE, Y okohama, Japan, 2024). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3018772

work page doi:10.1117/12.3018772 2024
[29]

The submillimeter Active Region excess brightness temperature during solar cycles 23 and 24

Giménez de Castro, C.G., et al. The submillimeter Active Region excess brightness temperature during solar cycles 23 and 24. Astrophys. J. 902(2), 136 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abb59e (2020) arXiv:2009.03445 [astro-ph.SR]

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb59e 2020
[30]

The predicition of solar flares using millimeter radio brightenings

Kallunki, J. The predicition of solar flares using millimeter radio brightenings. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences 60(2), 43–51 https://doi.org/10.2478/lpts-2023-0010 (2023)

work page doi:10.2478/lpts-2023-0010 2023
[31]

Radio measurements of the magnetic field in the solar chromosphere and the corona

Alissandrakis, C.E., & Gary, D.E. Radio measurements of the magnetic field in the solar chromosphere and the corona. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2020.591075 (2021)

work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2020.591075 2020
[32]

E., Ellerman, F ., Nicholson, S

Hale, G. E., Ellerman, F ., Nicholson, S. B. & Joy, A. H. The magnetic polarity of sun-spots. The Astrophysical Journal 49, 153 (1919)

1919
[33]

Research on mount wilson magnetic classification based on deep learning

He, Y ., et al. Research on mount wilson magnetic classification based on deep learning. Advances in Astronomy 2021, 5529383 https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5529383 (2021)

work page doi:10.1155/2021/5529383 2021
[34]

Characteristics of the photospheric magnetic field associated with solar flare initiation

Y ang, Y .-H., et al. Characteristics of the photospheric magnetic field associated with solar flare initiation. Astrophys. J. 786(1), 72 https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/72 (2014)

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/786/1/72 2014
[35]

A statistical study of flare productivity associated with sunspot properties in different magnetic types of active regions

Y ang, Y .-H., Hsieh, M.-S., Yu, H.-S., & Chen, P .F . A statistical study of flare productivity associated with sunspot properties in different magnetic types of active regions. The Astrophysical Journal 834(2), 150 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/150 (2017)

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/150 2017
[36]

Investigating the associations between solar flares and magnetic complexity of active regions

Oloketuyi, J., Liu, Y ., & Elmhamdi, A. Investigating the associations between solar flares and magnetic complexity of active regions. New Astron. 100, 101972 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2022.101972 (2023)

work page doi:10.1016/j.newast.2022.101972 2022
[37]

, keywords =

Akhmedov, S.B., Gelfreikh, G.B., Bogod, V .M., & Korzhavin, A.N. The measurement of magnetic fields in the solar atmosphere above sunspots using gyro-resonance emission. Sol. Phys. 79(1), 41–58 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146972 (1982)

work page doi:10.1007/bf00146972 1982
[38]

Alissandrakis, C. E. et al. Spectral observations of active region sources with RATAN-600 and WSRT. Astron. Astrophys. 270(1–2), 509–515 (1993)

1993
[40]

The radio properties of solar Active Region soft X-Ray transient brightenings

White, S.M., Kundu, M.R., Shimizu, T., Shibasaki, K., & Enome, S. The radio properties of solar Active Region soft X-Ray transient brightenings. Astrophys. J. 450, 435 https://doi.org/10.1086/176153 (1995)

work page doi:10.1086/176153 1995
[41]

Soft X-Ray and gyroresonance emission above sunspots

Nindos, A., Kundu, M.R., White, S.M., Shibasaki, K., & Gopalswamy, N. Soft X-Ray and gyroresonance emission above sunspots. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 130(2), 485–499 https://doi.org/10.1086/317355 (2000)

work page doi:10.1086/317355 2000
[42]

A radio study of the evolution of spatial structure of an Active Region and flare productivity

Kundu, M.R., White, S.M., Shibasaki, K., & Raulin, J.-P . A radio study of the evolution of spatial structure of an Active Region and flare productivity. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 133(2), 467–482 https://doi.org/10.1086/320351 (2001)

work page doi:10.1086/320351 2001
[43]

Sunspot gyroresonance emission at 17 GHz: a statistical study

Vourlidas, A., Gary, D.E., & Shibasaki, K. Sunspot gyroresonance emission at 17 GHz: a statistical study. Publ. Astron. 58(1), 11–20 https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/58.1.11 (2006)

work page doi:10.1093/pasj/58.1.11 2006
[44]

A model for the sources of the slowly varying component of microwave solar radiation

Kakinuma, T., & Swarup, G. A model for the sources of the slowly varying component of microwave solar radiation. Astrophys. J. 136, 975 https://doi.org/10.1086/147450 (1962)

work page doi:10.1086/147450 1962
[45]

Spatially resolved microwave oscillations above a sunspot

Nindos, A., Alissandrakis, C.E., Gelfreikh, G.B., Bogod, V .M., & Gontikakis, C. Spatially resolved microwave oscillations above a sunspot. Astron. Astrophys. 386, 658–673 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20020252 (2002)

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020252 2002
[46]

Vatrushin, S.M., & Korzhavin, A.N.: Sci. Proc. of VI Sem. In: Somov, B.V ., Fomichev, V .V ., Stepanov, A.V . (eds.) Physics of the Solar Plasma. 100–106 (Moscow Izdatel Nauka, 1989)

1989
[47]

Somov, B. V . Non-neutral current sheets and solar flare energetics. Astron. Astrophys. 163(1–2), 210–218 (1986)

1986
[48]

Magnetohydrodynamic simulation of a solar flare: 2

Podgorny, A.I., & Podgorny, I.M. Magnetohydrodynamic simulation of a solar flare: 2. Flare model and simulation using active- region magnetic maps. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 52(2), 162–175 https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793212020119 (2012)

work page doi:10.1134/s0016793212020119 2012
[49]

On magnetic fields of Active Regions at coronal heights

Bogod, V .M., Stupishin, A.G., & Y asnov, L.V . On magnetic fields of Active Regions at coronal heights. Sol. Phys. 276(1-2), 61–73 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9850-2 (2012)

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9850-2 2012
[50]

Local maximum in the microwave spectrum of solar active regions as a factor in predicting powerful flares

Borovik, V .N., Grigor’ eva, I.Y ., & Korzhavin, A.N. Local maximum in the microwave spectrum of solar active regions as a factor in predicting powerful flares. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 52(8), 1032–1043 https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679321208004X (2012)

work page doi:10.1134/s001679321208004x 2012
[51]

Long-term oscillations of sunspots from simultaneous observations with the Nobeyama Radioheliograph and Solar Dynamics Observatory

Abramov-maximov, V .E., Efremov, V .I., Parfinenko, L.D., Solov’ ev, A.A., & Shibasaki, K. Long-term oscillations of sunspots from simultaneous observations with the Nobeyama Radioheliograph and Solar Dynamics Observatory. Publ. Astron. 65, 12 h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 9 3 / p a s j / 6 5 . s p 1 . S 1 2 (2013)

2013
[52]

A new catalogue of solar flare events from soft x-ray goes signal in the period 1986–2020

Plutino, N., Berrilli, F ., Moro, D.D., Luca, & Giovannelli. A new catalogue of solar flare events from soft x-ray goes signal in the period 1986–2020. Advances in Space Research 71(4), 2048–2058 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.11.020 (2023)

work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2022.11.020 1986
[53]

Asr: Archival solar flares catalog

Berretti, M., et al. Asr: Archival solar flares catalog. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 278(1), 9 h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 3 8 4 7 / 1 5 3 8 - 4 3 6 5 / a d c 7 3 1 (2025)

2025
[54]

The first AGILE solar flare catalog

Ursi, A., et al. The first AGILE solar flare catalog. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 267(1), 9 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/acd4b6 (2023) arXiv:2305.14957 [astro-ph.SR]

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acd4b6 2023
[55]

S., Barnes, W

The SunPy Community, Barnes, W .T., et al. The sunpy project: Open source development and status of the version 1.0 core package. Astrophys. J. 890, 68 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4f7a (2020)

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4f7a 2020
[56]

Research and In- novation 2014-2020

Mumford, S., et al. SunPy: A Python package for Solar Physics. The Journal of Open Source Software 5(46), 1832 h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 2 1 1 0 5 / j o s s . 0 1 8 3 2 (2020) Acknowledgments The Medicina Radio Telescope is funded by the Ministry of University and Research (MIUR) and is operated as National Facility by the National Institute f...

work page doi:10.1038/s41598-025-27776-2 2020