Gate- and Optically Controlled Nonlinear Optical Response in Graphene via Non-Perturbative Ultrafast Carrier Dynamics

Chuanshan Tian; Xiaolong Lv; Yuxuan Wei; Yu Zhang

arxiv: 2604.22321 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Gate- and Optically Controlled Nonlinear Optical Response in Graphene via Non-Perturbative Ultrafast Carrier Dynamics

Xiaolong Lv , Yu Zhang , Yuxuan Wei , Chuanshan Tian This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 10:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics

keywords graphenenonlinear opticsultrafast carrier dynamicsthird-harmonic generationsum-frequency generationhot carriersFermi levelspectral shift

0 comments

The pith

Intense optical pumping in gated graphene shifts third-harmonic and sum-frequency signals by up to 8 THz through nonequilibrium carrier dynamics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that pump-induced hot carriers in suspended graphene produce large, reversible frequency shifts in nonlinear optical outputs such as third-harmonic generation and sum-frequency generation. These shifts reach 8 THz and their size and direction depend on the Fermi level set by electrostatic gating as well as on the pump intensity and conditions. A quasiequilibrium model based on carrier heating and its interplay with the Fermi level accounts for the observed spectral changes. The suspended platform enables the required wide gating range and high intensities without substrate artifacts. If the mechanism holds, it supplies a practical method for carrier-based spectral control of nonlinear processes in graphene.

Core claim

By pumping suspended graphene with intense ultrafast pulses while varying the gate voltage, we observe that the spectra of THG and SFG shift by up to 8 THz, with the direction and size depending on the Fermi level and excitation intensity. These changes arise from the nonequilibrium distribution of hot carriers created by the pump. A quasiequilibrium model based on carrier heating reproduces the spectral evolution, showing the interplay between increased carrier temperature and the position of the Fermi level in the Dirac cone.

What carries the argument

Quasiequilibrium hot-carrier dynamics, which describes how pump-induced carrier heating alters the nonlinear optical susceptibility in the presence of a tunable Fermi level.

If this is right

Carrier heating supplies a universal mechanism for spectral control of nonlinear signals in graphene.
Both THG and SFG processes exhibit the same gate- and pump-tunable frequency shifts.
Reversible control is achieved by changing Fermi level or excitation conditions without altering the material structure.
The effect opens a route to high-speed, gate-tunable nonlinear photonic devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same carrier-heating mechanism may produce analogous spectral tuning in other two-dimensional Dirac materials.
The approach could enable all-optical frequency conversion or modulation schemes that rely on ultrafast carrier injection rather than structural changes.
Testing the model at still higher intensities would reveal whether non-quasiequilibrium features become important.

Load-bearing premise

The suspended graphene maintains its intrinsic Dirac properties under wide-range gating and intense pumping without substrate-induced artifacts, and a quasiequilibrium hot-carrier description suffices to capture the non-perturbative dynamics.

What would settle it

If the measured THG and SFG spectra show no frequency shifts or shifts whose magnitude and direction fail to match quantitative predictions obtained by varying hot-carrier temperature and Fermi level in the model, the proposed carrier-mediated mechanism would be ruled out.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22321 by Chuanshan Tian, Xiaolong Lv, Yuxuan Wei, Yu Zhang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Gate and optical control of nonlinear optical response in suspended view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Carrier-driven nonlinear susceptibility dynamics in graphene. view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Third-harmonic generation under gate tuning and chirped excitation. view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Third-harmonic generation in the high-intensity regime. (a,b) view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Pump-probe THG measurements revealing ultrafast optical control. (a) view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Spectral modulation in SFG. (a) Temporal configuration of the two pulses: a picosecond 800 nm pulse (1.5 ps, 0.6 GW/cm2 ) and a fs mid-IR pulse (~2700 cm-1, 6 GW/cm2 ). (b) Experimentally measured SFG center frequency shift as a function of pump-probe delay at different Fermi levels. (c) Corresponding simulations based on the GHEM. Similar to the THG process, the phase of 𝜒ௌிீ (ଶ) (𝜇, 𝑇) decreases with inc… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

While the Dirac band structure of graphene has established it as a leading platform for ultrafast optoelectronics, its non-perturbative nonlinear response under intense excitation remains poorly understood. Here, we report ultrafast spectral modulation of nonlinear optical signals in graphene. By utilizing a robust suspended-graphene platform that allows for both wide-range electrostatic gating and high optical damage thresholds, we observe dramatic frequency shifts (up to 8 THz) in third-harmonic generation (THG) and sum-frequency generation (SFG) driven by pump-induced nonequilibrium carrier dynamics. The magnitude and even the direction of this spectral shift can be reversibly controlled by the Fermi level and excitation conditions. A quasiequilibrium theoretical framework based on hot-carrier dynamics quantitatively reproduces the measured spectral evolution, elucidating the critical interplay between carrier heating and the Fermi level. These findings establish a universal mechanism for carrier-mediated spectral control, providing a practical route toward high-speed, gatetunable nonlinear photonic architectures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper reports controllable THz-scale shifts in graphene THG/SFG from gate and pump, backed by a hot-carrier model, but the quasiequilibrium fit to non-perturbative dynamics is the part that needs checking.

read the letter

The main result here is the observation of reversible frequency shifts up to 8 THz in third-harmonic and sum-frequency generation from suspended graphene, where both the size and sign of the shift respond to Fermi level and excitation strength. They tie this to pump-induced carrier heating and show that a simple quasiequilibrium model with raised temperature and chemical potential tracks the spectral changes. The suspended platform is a practical strength because it supports wide electrostatic gating and higher intensities without substrate artifacts or early damage. That setup lets them map the control parameters cleanly, which is useful for anyone thinking about tunable nonlinear sources in 2D materials. The claim that carrier dynamics provide a universal spectral-control route is stated directly and follows from the data they describe. The soft spot is the modeling link. The title and abstract emphasize non-perturbative ultrafast dynamics, yet the reproduction relies on a thermal hot-carrier picture. If the actual carrier distribution stays non-thermal on the timescale of the nonlinear process, the quantitative match could be partly coincidental. The abstract does not spell out independent checks on thermalization time or whether the model parameters were fixed before fitting the shifts, so that part stays less secure than the raw observation. This is worth reading for groups working on ultrafast graphene optics or gate-tunable photonics. The experimental control looks solid enough to justify referee time, even if the theory section will probably need more detail on timescales and parameter independence. I would send it out for review rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental observation of large, reversible frequency shifts (up to 8 THz) in third-harmonic generation (THG) and sum-frequency generation (SFG) from suspended graphene under intense ultrafast optical pumping. These shifts are driven by pump-induced nonequilibrium carrier dynamics and can be controlled in both magnitude and sign by electrostatic gating (Fermi level) and excitation conditions. A quasiequilibrium hot-carrier model is shown to quantitatively reproduce the measured spectral evolution.

Significance. If the quantitative agreement is robust and the quasiequilibrium approximation is independently justified, the work identifies a carrier-mediated mechanism for ultrafast spectral tuning of nonlinear optical responses in graphene. The suspended platform enabling wide-range gating without artifacts and high damage thresholds is a clear experimental strength. This could inform design of gate-tunable nonlinear photonic elements, though the significance hinges on resolving the tension between non-perturbative dynamics and the thermal model.

major comments (2)

[Theory section] Theory section (and abstract): The title and abstract invoke 'non-perturbative ultrafast carrier dynamics', yet the central model assumes a quasiequilibrium hot-carrier distribution (elevated T and μ). The manuscript must provide direct evidence—such as time-resolved carrier distribution measurements or calculated thermalization rates within the ~100 fs window—that justifies this approximation for the observed shifts; otherwise the quantitative match risks being coincidental rather than mechanistic.
[Results section] Results section: The claim that the model 'quantitatively reproduces' the spectral evolution (up to 8 THz shifts) requires explicit reporting of how model parameters (carrier temperature, scattering rates, etc.) are obtained—whether from independent pump-probe data or adjusted to fit the THG/SFG spectra. Without this, the agreement cannot be assessed for circularity or predictive power.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The phrasing 'non-Perturbative' in the title contrasts with the quasiequilibrium framework; a brief clarification of the regime would improve consistency.
[Figures] Figures: Spectral plots should include error bars, raw data points, and details of the fitting procedure used to extract the reported frequency shifts to allow readers to judge the quantitative support.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below and have prepared revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Theory section] Theory section (and abstract): The title and abstract invoke 'non-perturbative ultrafast carrier dynamics', yet the central model assumes a quasiequilibrium hot-carrier distribution (elevated T and μ). The manuscript must provide direct evidence—such as time-resolved carrier distribution measurements or calculated thermalization rates within the ~100 fs window—that justifies this approximation for the observed shifts; otherwise the quantitative match risks being coincidental rather than mechanistic.

Authors: We agree that the terminology requires clarification. The phrase 'non-perturbative ultrafast carrier dynamics' in the title and abstract refers to the regime of intense pumping that drives large deviations in carrier temperature and density, producing nonlinear shifts in the optical response that cannot be captured by perturbative expansions. The model itself employs a quasiequilibrium hot-carrier distribution because carrier-carrier thermalization in graphene occurs on 10–50 fs timescales (well within the ~100 fs experimental window), as documented in multiple ultrafast spectroscopy studies. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated paragraph in the Theory section that (i) cites the relevant thermalization literature, (ii) provides order-of-magnitude estimates of the carrier-carrier scattering rate using Fermi’s golden rule for the relevant Fermi energies and excess energies, and (iii) explicitly states the temporal window over which the quasiequilibrium approximation is applied. This addition directly addresses the request for justification without requiring new experimental data. revision: yes
Referee: [Results section] Results section: The claim that the model 'quantitatively reproduces' the spectral evolution (up to 8 THz shifts) requires explicit reporting of how model parameters (carrier temperature, scattering rates, etc.) are obtained—whether from independent pump-probe data or adjusted to fit the THG/SFG spectra. Without this, the agreement cannot be assessed for circularity or predictive power.

Authors: We accept this criticism. In the original submission the provenance of the model parameters was stated only briefly. The revised Results section will contain an explicit subsection (and accompanying table) that lists every parameter, its numerical value for each gate voltage and pump fluence, and its source: carrier temperature and chemical potential are extracted from separate pump-probe reflectivity measurements performed on identically prepared suspended graphene devices; momentum scattering rates are taken from published temperature-dependent mobility data for graphene; and the nonlinear susceptibility is computed from the Dirac-fermion model without additional fitting to the THG/SFG spectra. With these clarifications the reader can verify that the spectral shifts are predicted rather than fitted, removing any concern of circularity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe experimental observation of frequency shifts in THG/SFG driven by pump-induced carrier dynamics, with a quasiequilibrium hot-carrier model stated to quantitatively reproduce the spectral evolution. No equations, self-citations, or derivation steps are quoted that reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, import uniqueness from prior self-work, or smuggle an ansatz. The model is presented as an explanatory framework matching independent measurements rather than a tautological fit; the central claim remains externally falsifiable via the suspended-graphene platform data. This is the expected honest non-finding for a paper whose theory section is not shown to collapse into its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

From the abstract, no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are detailed. The hot-carrier dynamics likely rely on standard physical assumptions in the field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5480 in / 1182 out tokens · 86533 ms · 2026-05-08T10:49:23.950516+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

[1]

Geim, A. K. & Novoselov, K. S. The rise of graphene. Nature Mater 6, 183–191 (2007)

work page 2007
[2]

H., Guinea, F., Peres, N

Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S. & Geim, A. K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109–162 (2009)

work page 2009
[3]

Graphene: Electronic and Photonic Properties and Devices

Avouris, P. Graphene: Electronic and Photonic Properties and Devices. Nano Lett. 10, 4285–4294 (2010)

work page 2010
[4]

& Ferrari, A

Bonaccorso, F., Sun, Z., Hasan, T. & Ferrari, A. C. Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nature Photon 4, 611–622 (2010)

work page 2010
[5]

Liu, M. et al. A graphene-based broadband optical modulator. Nature 474, 64–67 (2011)

work page 2011
[6]

T., Daniel Lee, Y .-H., Cardenas, J

Phare, C. T., Daniel Lee, Y .-H., Cardenas, J. & Lipson, M. Graphene electro-optic modulator with 30 GHz bandwidth. Nature Photon 9, 511–514 (2015)

work page 2015
[7]

& Avouris, P

Xia, F., Mueller, T., Lin, Y ., Valdes-Garcia, A. & Avouris, P. Ultrafast graphene photodetector. Nature Nanotech 4, 839–843 (2009)

work page 2009
[8]

Schuler, S. et al. Controlled Generation of a p–n Junction in a Waveguide Integrated Graphene Photodetector. Nano Lett. 16, 7107–7112 (2016)

work page 2016
[9]

Ni, G. X. et al. Ultrafast optical switching of infrared plasmon polaritons in high- mobility graphene. Nature Photon 10, 244–247 (2016)

work page 2016
[10]

Glazov, M. M. & Ganichev, S. D. High frequency electric field induced nonlinear effects in graphene. Physics Reports 535, 101–138 (2014)

work page 2014
[11]

Perspectives on nonlinear optics of graphene: Opportunities and challenges

Vermeulen, N. Perspectives on nonlinear optics of graphene: Opportunities and challenges. APL Photonics 7, 020901 (2022)

work page 2022
[12]

Jiang, T. et al. Gate-tunable third-order nonlinear optical response of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature Photon 12, 430–436 (2018)

work page 2018
[13]

Soavi, G. et al. Broadband, electrically tunable third-harmonic generation in graphene. Nature Nanotech 13, 583–588 (2018)

work page 2018
[14]

Gu, T. et al. Regenerative oscillation and four-wave mixing in graphene optoelectronics. Nature Photon 6, 554–559 (2012)

work page 2012
[15]

J., Moger, J., Savchenko, A

Hendry, E., Hale, P. J., Moger, J., Savchenko, A. K. & Mikhailov, S. A. Coherent Nonlinear Optical Response of Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 097401 (2010)

work page 2010
[16]

& Tanaka, K

Yoshikawa, N., Tamaya, T. & Tanaka, K. High-harmonic generation in graphene enhanced by elliptically polarized light excitation. Science 356, 736–738 (2017)

work page 2017
[17]

Hafez, H. A. et al. Extremely efficient terahertz high-harmonic generation in graphene by hot Dirac fermions. Nature 561, 507–511 (2018)

work page 2018
[18]

Baudisch, M. et al. Ultrafast nonlinear optical response of Dirac fermions in graphene. Nat Commun 9, 1018 (2018)

work page 2018
[19]

& Roy, S

Sahoo, A., Marini, A. & Roy, S. Free-carrier-induced nonlinear dynamics in hybrid graphene-based photonic waveguides. Phys. Rev. A 104, 063501 (2021)

work page 2021
[20]

& Tian, C.-S

Xu, Y ., Ma, Y .-B., Gu, F., Yang, S.-S. & Tian, C.-S. Structure evolution at the gate- tunable suspended graphene–water interface. Nature 621, 506–510 (2023)

work page 2023
[21]

Pisana, S. et al. Breakdown of the adiabatic Born-Oppenheimer approximation in graphene. Nat Mater 6, 198–201 (2007)

work page 2007
[22]

& Pinczuk, A

Yan, J., Zhang, Y ., Kim, P. & Pinczuk, A. Electric Field Effect Tuning of Electron- Phonon Coupling in Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 166802 (2007)

work page 2007
[23]

Johannsen, J. C. et al. Direct View of Hot Carrier Dynamics in Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 027403 (2013)

work page 2013
[24]

Gierz, I. et al. Snapshots of non-equilibrium Dirac carrier distributions in graphene. Nature Mater 12, 1119–1124 (2013)

work page 2013
[25]

Gierz, I. et al. Tracking Primary Thermalization Events in Graphene with Photoemission at Extreme Time Scales. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 086803 (2015)

work page 2015
[26]

Tomadin, A. et al. The ultrafast dynamics and conductivity of photoexcited graphene at different Fermi energies. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar5313 (2018)

work page 2018
[27]

Tielrooij, K. J. et al. Photoexcitation cascade and multiple hot-carrier generation in graphene. Nature Phys 9, 248–252 (2013)

work page 2013
[28]

Brida, D. et al. Ultrafast collinear scattering and carrier multiplication in graphene. Nat Commun 4, 1987 (2013)

work page 1987
[29]

Li, T. et al. Femtosecond Population Inversion and Stimulated Emission of Dense Dirac Fermions in Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 167401 (2012)

work page 2012
[30]

George, P. A. et al. Ultrafast Optical-Pump Terahertz-Probe Spectroscopy of the Carrier Relaxation and Recombination Dynamics in Epitaxial Graphene. Nano Lett. 8, 4248–4251 (2008)

work page 2008
[31]

Mikhailov, S. A. Theory of the strongly nonlinear electrodynamic response of graphene: A hot electron model. Phys. Rev. B 100, 115416 (2019)

work page 2019
[32]

Vermeulen, N. et al. Graphene’s nonlinear-optical physics revealed through exponentially growing self-phase modulation. Nat Commun 9, 2675 (2018)

work page 2018
[33]

L., Vermeulen, N

Cheng, J. L., Vermeulen, N. & Sipe, J. E. Third-order nonlinearity of graphene: Effects of phenomenological relaxation and finite temperature. Phys. Rev. B 91, 235320 (2015)

work page 2015
[34]

L., Vermeulen, N

Cheng, J. L., Vermeulen, N. & Sipe, J. E. Third order optical nonlinearity of graphene. New J. Phys. 16, 053014 (2014)

work page 2014
[35]

Mikhailov, S. A. Quantum theory of the third-order nonlinear electrodynamic effects of graphene. Phys. Rev. B 93, 085403 (2016)

work page 2016
[36]

Soavi, G. et al. Hot Electrons Modulation of Third-Harmonic Generation in Graphene. ACS Photonics 6, 2841–2849 (2019)

work page 2019
[37]

Hong, S.-Y . et al. Optical Third-Harmonic Generation in Graphene. Phys. Rev. X 3, 021014 (2013)

work page 2013
[38]

L., Vermeulen, N

Cheng, J. L., Vermeulen, N. & Sipe, J. E. Second order optical nonlinearity of graphene due to electric quadrupole and magnetic dipole effects. Sci Rep 7, 43843 (2017)

work page 2017
[39]

& Belyanin, A

Wang, Y ., Tokman, M. & Belyanin, A. Second-order nonlinear optical response of graphene. Phys. Rev. B 94, 195442 (2016)

work page 2016

[1] [1]

Geim, A. K. & Novoselov, K. S. The rise of graphene. Nature Mater 6, 183–191 (2007)

work page 2007

[2] [2]

H., Guinea, F., Peres, N

Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S. & Geim, A. K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109–162 (2009)

work page 2009

[3] [3]

Graphene: Electronic and Photonic Properties and Devices

Avouris, P. Graphene: Electronic and Photonic Properties and Devices. Nano Lett. 10, 4285–4294 (2010)

work page 2010

[4] [4]

& Ferrari, A

Bonaccorso, F., Sun, Z., Hasan, T. & Ferrari, A. C. Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nature Photon 4, 611–622 (2010)

work page 2010

[5] [5]

Liu, M. et al. A graphene-based broadband optical modulator. Nature 474, 64–67 (2011)

work page 2011

[6] [6]

T., Daniel Lee, Y .-H., Cardenas, J

Phare, C. T., Daniel Lee, Y .-H., Cardenas, J. & Lipson, M. Graphene electro-optic modulator with 30 GHz bandwidth. Nature Photon 9, 511–514 (2015)

work page 2015

[7] [7]

& Avouris, P

Xia, F., Mueller, T., Lin, Y ., Valdes-Garcia, A. & Avouris, P. Ultrafast graphene photodetector. Nature Nanotech 4, 839–843 (2009)

work page 2009

[8] [8]

Schuler, S. et al. Controlled Generation of a p–n Junction in a Waveguide Integrated Graphene Photodetector. Nano Lett. 16, 7107–7112 (2016)

work page 2016

[9] [9]

Ni, G. X. et al. Ultrafast optical switching of infrared plasmon polaritons in high- mobility graphene. Nature Photon 10, 244–247 (2016)

work page 2016

[10] [10]

Glazov, M. M. & Ganichev, S. D. High frequency electric field induced nonlinear effects in graphene. Physics Reports 535, 101–138 (2014)

work page 2014

[11] [11]

Perspectives on nonlinear optics of graphene: Opportunities and challenges

Vermeulen, N. Perspectives on nonlinear optics of graphene: Opportunities and challenges. APL Photonics 7, 020901 (2022)

work page 2022

[12] [12]

Jiang, T. et al. Gate-tunable third-order nonlinear optical response of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature Photon 12, 430–436 (2018)

work page 2018

[13] [13]

Soavi, G. et al. Broadband, electrically tunable third-harmonic generation in graphene. Nature Nanotech 13, 583–588 (2018)

work page 2018

[14] [14]

Gu, T. et al. Regenerative oscillation and four-wave mixing in graphene optoelectronics. Nature Photon 6, 554–559 (2012)

work page 2012

[15] [15]

J., Moger, J., Savchenko, A

Hendry, E., Hale, P. J., Moger, J., Savchenko, A. K. & Mikhailov, S. A. Coherent Nonlinear Optical Response of Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 097401 (2010)

work page 2010

[16] [16]

& Tanaka, K

Yoshikawa, N., Tamaya, T. & Tanaka, K. High-harmonic generation in graphene enhanced by elliptically polarized light excitation. Science 356, 736–738 (2017)

work page 2017

[17] [17]

Hafez, H. A. et al. Extremely efficient terahertz high-harmonic generation in graphene by hot Dirac fermions. Nature 561, 507–511 (2018)

work page 2018

[18] [18]

Baudisch, M. et al. Ultrafast nonlinear optical response of Dirac fermions in graphene. Nat Commun 9, 1018 (2018)

work page 2018

[19] [19]

& Roy, S

Sahoo, A., Marini, A. & Roy, S. Free-carrier-induced nonlinear dynamics in hybrid graphene-based photonic waveguides. Phys. Rev. A 104, 063501 (2021)

work page 2021

[20] [20]

& Tian, C.-S

Xu, Y ., Ma, Y .-B., Gu, F., Yang, S.-S. & Tian, C.-S. Structure evolution at the gate- tunable suspended graphene–water interface. Nature 621, 506–510 (2023)

work page 2023

[21] [21]

Pisana, S. et al. Breakdown of the adiabatic Born-Oppenheimer approximation in graphene. Nat Mater 6, 198–201 (2007)

work page 2007

[22] [22]

& Pinczuk, A

Yan, J., Zhang, Y ., Kim, P. & Pinczuk, A. Electric Field Effect Tuning of Electron- Phonon Coupling in Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 166802 (2007)

work page 2007

[23] [23]

Johannsen, J. C. et al. Direct View of Hot Carrier Dynamics in Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 027403 (2013)

work page 2013

[24] [24]

Gierz, I. et al. Snapshots of non-equilibrium Dirac carrier distributions in graphene. Nature Mater 12, 1119–1124 (2013)

work page 2013

[25] [25]

Gierz, I. et al. Tracking Primary Thermalization Events in Graphene with Photoemission at Extreme Time Scales. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 086803 (2015)

work page 2015

[26] [26]

Tomadin, A. et al. The ultrafast dynamics and conductivity of photoexcited graphene at different Fermi energies. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar5313 (2018)

work page 2018

[27] [27]

Tielrooij, K. J. et al. Photoexcitation cascade and multiple hot-carrier generation in graphene. Nature Phys 9, 248–252 (2013)

work page 2013

[28] [28]

Brida, D. et al. Ultrafast collinear scattering and carrier multiplication in graphene. Nat Commun 4, 1987 (2013)

work page 1987

[29] [29]

Li, T. et al. Femtosecond Population Inversion and Stimulated Emission of Dense Dirac Fermions in Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 167401 (2012)

work page 2012

[30] [30]

George, P. A. et al. Ultrafast Optical-Pump Terahertz-Probe Spectroscopy of the Carrier Relaxation and Recombination Dynamics in Epitaxial Graphene. Nano Lett. 8, 4248–4251 (2008)

work page 2008

[31] [31]

Mikhailov, S. A. Theory of the strongly nonlinear electrodynamic response of graphene: A hot electron model. Phys. Rev. B 100, 115416 (2019)

work page 2019

[32] [32]

Vermeulen, N. et al. Graphene’s nonlinear-optical physics revealed through exponentially growing self-phase modulation. Nat Commun 9, 2675 (2018)

work page 2018

[33] [33]

L., Vermeulen, N

Cheng, J. L., Vermeulen, N. & Sipe, J. E. Third-order nonlinearity of graphene: Effects of phenomenological relaxation and finite temperature. Phys. Rev. B 91, 235320 (2015)

work page 2015

[34] [34]

L., Vermeulen, N

Cheng, J. L., Vermeulen, N. & Sipe, J. E. Third order optical nonlinearity of graphene. New J. Phys. 16, 053014 (2014)

work page 2014

[35] [35]

Mikhailov, S. A. Quantum theory of the third-order nonlinear electrodynamic effects of graphene. Phys. Rev. B 93, 085403 (2016)

work page 2016

[36] [36]

Soavi, G. et al. Hot Electrons Modulation of Third-Harmonic Generation in Graphene. ACS Photonics 6, 2841–2849 (2019)

work page 2019

[37] [37]

Hong, S.-Y . et al. Optical Third-Harmonic Generation in Graphene. Phys. Rev. X 3, 021014 (2013)

work page 2013

[38] [38]

L., Vermeulen, N

Cheng, J. L., Vermeulen, N. & Sipe, J. E. Second order optical nonlinearity of graphene due to electric quadrupole and magnetic dipole effects. Sci Rep 7, 43843 (2017)

work page 2017

[39] [39]

& Belyanin, A

Wang, Y ., Tokman, M. & Belyanin, A. Second-order nonlinear optical response of graphene. Phys. Rev. B 94, 195442 (2016)

work page 2016