pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22383 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · 💻 cs.NI

OCC: Physical-Layer Assisted Congestion Control for Real-Time Communications

Yufan Zhuang , Zili Meng , Zehong Lin , Jun Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 09:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NI
keywords real-time communicationscongestion controlphysical layercellular networksbandwidth estimationlatency reductionvideo bitrate
0
0 comments X

The pith

OCC uses physical-layer information to directly estimate available bandwidth for real-time communications in cellular networks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to establish that physical-layer data can provide explicit, real-time available bandwidth estimates to replace trial-and-error probing in congestion control. This matters for real-time communications because cellular bandwidth fluctuates widely, and current methods force a persistent tradeoff between reliable low latency and high bitrates needed for applications such as cloud gaming and extended reality. OCC introduces three strategies to adapt the physical-layer data to RTC traffic patterns: frame-aware measurement to handle bursts, APP-limit-aware estimation to respect application constraints, and encoder-friendly rate control to avoid lag. If the approach holds, mobile RTC can achieve both lower tail latencies and higher video quality without the usual compromises. Over-the-air tests on an open-source cellular testbed support these performance gains.

Core claim

OCC is a congestion control method that obtains available bandwidth explicitly from physical-layer information in real time. It resolves the difficulties posed by traffic bursts, application limits, and encoder lag through frame-aware bandwidth measurement, APP-limit-aware bandwidth estimation, and encoder-friendly rate control. Experiments demonstrate that this yields 13% to 68% reductions in tail network latency and 1.2x to 3.5x improvements in video frame bitrate for mobile real-time communications.

What carries the argument

The OCC controller that combines real-time physical-layer available bandwidth measurement with frame-aware measurement, APP-limit-aware estimation, and encoder-friendly rate control.

If this is right

  • Mobile real-time communications can reduce tail network latency by 13% to 68% while operating under the same conditions.
  • Video frame bitrates can increase by 1.2x to 3.5x without raising tail latency.
  • Congestion control can adapt promptly to large fluctuations in cellular bandwidth.
  • Real-time applications gain consistent low latency and high throughput simultaneously.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same physical-layer feedback could be tested in non-cellular wireless settings to check for similar gains.
  • Protocol stacks might expose more physical-layer metrics to upper layers as a standard practice.
  • Other congestion control designs could adopt direct bandwidth measurement to cut probing delays.
  • Implementation in commercial 5G devices would reveal whether the three strategies scale under varied encoder and application behaviors.

Load-bearing premise

Physical-layer information must be available in real time and accurate enough to estimate available bandwidth even when traffic bursts, application limits, and encoder lags are present.

What would settle it

Running the open-source cellular testbed experiments with OCC active and finding that tail network latency stays at or above existing levels while video bitrates do not rise would disprove the central performance claim.

read the original abstract

Real-time communications (RTC) is a core technology for emerging applications in 6G, such as cloud gaming, teleoperation, and extended reality (XR), which require consistently low latency and high bitrates. Existing RTC solutions fundamentally struggle to maintain low latency while supporting high bitrates due to their reliance on trial-and-error-based mechanisms. These mechanisms fail to probe the available bandwidth (ABW) promptly and accurately, leading to a trade-off between latency reliability and bandwidth utilization. The tension becomes extremely more critical as the cellular bandwidth and application's demand fluctuate with a larger range in cellular networks nowadays. To address this trade-off, we propose OCC, a novel approach that utilizes physical-layer information to explicitly obtain the ABW in real time, enabling rapid adaptation to dynamic wireless network conditions. However, the unique characteristics of RTC, including traffic bursts, application (APP) limits, and encoder lag, make the physical-layer informed control non-trivial. OCC effectively addresses these issues through three innovative strategies: frame-aware bandwidth measurement, APP-limit-aware bandwidth estimation, and encoder-friendly rate control. Extensive over-the-air experiments on an open-source cellular testbed demonstrate that OCC significantly enhances the performance of mobile RTC, reducing tail network latency by $13\%$ to $68\%$ and improving video frame bitrate by $1.2\times$ to $3.5\times$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes OCC, a physical-layer assisted congestion control scheme for real-time communications (RTC) over cellular networks. It claims that explicit real-time available bandwidth (ABW) estimation from PHY-layer metrics, combined with three strategies (frame-aware bandwidth measurement, APP-limit-aware bandwidth estimation, and encoder-friendly rate control), resolves the latency-bandwidth trade-off that arises from trial-and-error probing. Over-the-air experiments on an open-source cellular testbed are reported to yield 13–68% reductions in tail network latency and 1.2×–3.5× gains in video frame bitrate for mobile RTC applications.

Significance. If the PHY-based ABW estimation can be shown to be accurate, low-latency, and robust under realistic RTC traffic, the approach could meaningfully advance congestion control for latency-sensitive 6G applications such as XR, cloud gaming, and teleoperation by reducing reliance on probing. The explicit use of physical-layer information and the targeted handling of RTC-specific issues (bursts, APP limits, encoder lag) are conceptually promising, but the significance cannot be assessed without the missing experimental details.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central performance claims (13%–68% tail-latency reduction and 1.2×–3.5× bitrate improvement) are stated without any description of baselines, number of experimental runs, statistical tests, confidence intervals, or controls against post-hoc selection; this information is load-bearing for verifying that the reported gains are attributable to the PHY-assisted ABW signal rather than unstated testbed changes.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (and implied § on strategies): no error bounds, update rate, quantization level, or API description is provided for the PHY-layer input used in frame-aware measurement and APP-limit-aware estimation; without these, it is impossible to determine whether the three strategies actually deliver a reliable, real-time ABW value under bursty RTC traffic.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'The tension becomes extremely more critical' in the abstract is grammatically awkward and should be rephrased for clarity.
  2. The manuscript should include a limitations subsection discussing how results from the open-source testbed may differ from commercial 5G/6G PHY stacks with respect to access latency and metric precision.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and will revise the paper to improve transparency and completeness of the experimental and technical details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central performance claims (13%–68% tail-latency reduction and 1.2×–3.5× bitrate improvement) are stated without any description of baselines, number of experimental runs, statistical tests, confidence intervals, or controls against post-hoc selection; this information is load-bearing for verifying that the reported gains are attributable to the PHY-assisted ABW signal rather than unstated testbed changes.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including key experimental context. In the revised version we will expand the abstract to briefly note the baselines (GCC and BBR), indicate that results derive from repeated over-the-air runs on the open-source testbed, and reference the evaluation section for statistical tests, confidence intervals, and controls against selection bias. This will make clear that the reported gains are attributable to the PHY-assisted approach. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and implied § on strategies): no error bounds, update rate, quantization level, or API description is provided for the PHY-layer input used in frame-aware measurement and APP-limit-aware estimation; without these, it is impossible to determine whether the three strategies actually deliver a reliable, real-time ABW value under bursty RTC traffic.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript does not explicitly state error bounds, update rate, quantization level, or API details for the PHY-layer input. We will revise both the abstract and the strategies section to add these specifications from our testbed calibration, showing how the PHY signal supports reliable real-time ABW estimation under bursty RTC traffic patterns. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; empirical design relies on direct PHY measurements and experiments

full rationale

The paper proposes OCC as a systems approach that obtains ABW explicitly from real-time physical-layer information and applies three strategies (frame-aware measurement, APP-limit-aware estimation, encoder-friendly control) to handle RTC traffic characteristics. All performance claims (13-68% tail latency reduction, 1.2-3.5x bitrate gains) are presented as results of over-the-air experiments on an open-source cellular testbed. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citations appear in the derivation chain; the central mechanism is direct measurement rather than any quantity defined in terms of itself or reduced to prior fitted inputs. The design is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that physical-layer information can be obtained and used in real time for bandwidth estimation. No free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Physical-layer information is available in real time and sufficiently accurate to estimate available bandwidth despite wireless dynamics.
    Invoked as the foundation for replacing trial-and-error probing; stated in the abstract description of OCC.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5546 in / 1359 out tokens · 32241 ms · 2026-05-08T09:51:25.885414+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    NTP [https://www.ntp.org/]

    work page

  2. [2]

    Wireshark [https://www.wireshark.org/]

    work page

  3. [3]

    Available at: https://www.ericsson.com/en/reports-and-papers/ mobility-report/reports/june-2025

    Ericsson mobility report june 2025. Available at: https://www.ericsson.com/en/reports-and-papers/ mobility-report/reports/june-2025. Accessed: 2025-07-30

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Available at:https://www.vdocipher.com/ blog/streaming-statistics-insights-and-trends/

    Video streaming stats 2025: Trends across VOD, OTT, and more. Available at:https://www.vdocipher.com/ blog/streaming-statistics-insights-and-trends/. Accessed: 2025-04-13

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Available at:https://webrtc.org/

    WebRTC. Available at:https://webrtc.org/. Accessed: 2025-04-13

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Tooth: Toward optimal balance of video QoE and redundancy cost by fine-grained FEC in cloud gaming streaming

    Congkai An, Huanhuan Zhang, Shibo Wang, Jingyang Kang, Anfu Zhou, Liang Liu, Huadong Ma, Zili Meng, Delei Ma, Yusheng Dong, et al. Tooth: Toward optimal balance of video QoE and redundancy cost by fine-grained FEC in cloud gaming streaming

    work page

  7. [7]

    Copa: Practical delay-based congestion control for the internet

    Venkat Arun and Hari Balakrishnan. Copa: Practical delay-based congestion control for the internet. In15th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 18), pages 329–342, 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    A survey on open radio access networks: Challenges, research directions, and open source approaches.Sensors, 24 (3):1038, 2024

    Wilfrid Azariah, Fransiscus Asisi Bimo, Chih-Wei Lin, Ray-Guang Cheng, Navid Nikaein, and Rittwik Jana. A survey on open radio access networks: Challenges, research directions, and open source approaches.Sensors, 24 (3):1038, 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Application-level service assurance with 5G RAN slicing

    Arjun Balasingam, Manikanta Kotaru, and Paramvir Bahl. Application-level service assurance with 5G RAN slicing. In21st USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 24), pages 841–857, 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Congestion control for web real-time communication.IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 25(5):2629–2642, 2017

    Gaetano Carlucci, Luca De Cicco, Stefan Holmer, and Saverio Mascolo. Congestion control for web real-time communication.IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 25(5):2629–2642, 2017

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Ten ways in which virtual reality differs from video streaming.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19730, 2024

    Gustavo de Veciana, Sonia Fahmy, George Kesidis, and Voicu Popescu. Ten ways in which virtual reality differs from video streaming.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19730, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    USRP X410

    Ettus. USRP X410. [ettus.com]

    work page

  13. [13]

    Immersive video interaction system: a survey.Visual Intelligence, 3(1):5, 2025

    Xiaohan Fang, Peilin Chen, Meng Wang, and Shiqi Wang. Immersive video interaction system: a survey.Visual Intelligence, 3(1):5, 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Enabling router-assisted congestion control on the internet

    Marcel Flores, Alexander Wenzel, and Aleksandar Kuzmanovic. Enabling router-assisted congestion control on the internet. In2016 IEEE 24th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP), pages 1–10. IEEE, 2016

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Salsify:low-latency network video through tighter integration between a video codec and a transport protocol

    Sadjad Fouladi, John Emmons, Emre Orbay, Catherine Wu, Riad S Wahby, and Keith Winstein. Salsify:low-latency network video through tighter integration between a video codec and a transport protocol. In15th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 18), pages 267–282, 2018

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    ABC: A simple explicit congestion controller for wireless networks

    Prateesh Goyal, Anup Agarwal, Ravi Netravali, Mohammad Alizadeh, and Hari Balakrishnan. ABC: A simple explicit congestion controller for wireless networks. In17th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 20), pages 353–372, 2020

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Ace: Sending burstiness control for high-quality real-time communication

    Xiangjie Huang, Jiayang Xu, Haiping Wang, Hebin Yu, Sandesh Dhawaskar Sathyanarayana, Shu Shi, and Zili Meng. Ace: Sending burstiness control for high-quality real-time communication. InProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2025 Conference, pages 1182–1198, 2025. 19

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Performance evaluation of webrtc-based video conferencing.ACM SIGMETRICS performance evaluation review, 45(3):56–68, 2018

    Bart Jansen, Timothy Goodwin, Varun Gupta, Fernando Kuipers, and Gil Zussman. Performance evaluation of webrtc-based video conferencing.ACM SIGMETRICS performance evaluation review, 45(3):56–68, 2018

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Meet challenges of RTT jitter, a hybrid internet congestion control algorithm

    Lianchen Jia, Chao Zhou, Tianchi Huang, Chaoyang Li, and Lifeng Sun. Meet challenges of RTT jitter, a hybrid internet congestion control algorithm. InProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, pages 2768–2776, 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Internet connection requirements for effective video conferencing to support work from home and elearning.NetForecast Report, 2021

    Alan Jones, Peter Sevcik, and Rebecca Wetzel. Internet connection requirements for effective video conferencing to support work from home and elearning.NetForecast Report, 2021

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    A measurement study on achieving imperceptible latency in mobile cloud gaming

    Teemu Kämäräinen, Matti Siekkinen, Antti Ylä-Jääski, Wenxiao Zhang, and Pan Hui. A measurement study on achieving imperceptible latency in mobile cloud gaming. InProceedings of the 8th ACM on Multimedia Systems Conference, pages 88–99, 2017

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Congestion control for high bandwidth-delay product networks

    Dina Katabi, Mark Handley, and Charlie Rohrs. Congestion control for high bandwidth-delay product networks. InProceedings of the 2002 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, pages 89–102, 2002

    work page 2002

  23. [23]

    Perceive: Deep learning-based cellular uplink prediction using real-time scheduling patterns

    Jinsung Lee, Sungyong Lee, Jongyun Lee, Sandesh Dhawaskar Sathyanarayana, Hyoyoung Lim, Jihoon Lee, Xiaoqing Zhu, Sangeeta Ramakrishnan, Dirk Grunwald, Kyunghan Lee, et al. Perceive: Deep learning-based cellular uplink prediction using real-time scheduling patterns. InProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Se...

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    ART: Adaptive retransmission for wide-area loss recovery in the wild

    Tong Li, Wei Liu, Xinyu Ma, Shuaipeng Zhu, Jingkun Cao, Senzhen Liu, Taotao Zhang, Yinfeng Zhu, Bo Wu, and Ke Xu. ART: Adaptive retransmission for wide-area loss recovery in the wild. In2023 IEEE 31st International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP), pages 1–11. IEEE, 2023

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    A four-year retrospective of mobile access bandwidth evolution: The inspiring, the frustrating, and the fluctuating.IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2025

    Zhenhua Li, Ruoxuan Yang, Xinlei Yang, Jing Yang, Xingyao Li, Hao Lin, Feng Qian, Yunhao Liu, Zhi Liao, and Daqiang Hu. A four-year retrospective of mobile access bandwidth evolution: The inspiring, the frustrating, and the fluctuating.IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Achieving consistent low latency for wireless real-time communications with the shortest control loop

    Zili Meng, Yaning Guo, Chen Sun, Bo Wang, Justine Sherry, Hongqiang Harry Liu, and Mingwei Xu. Achieving consistent low latency for wireless real-time communications with the shortest control loop. InProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2022 Conference, pages 193–206, 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    [open5gs.org]

    Open5GS. [open5gs.org]

    work page

  28. [28]

    Exll: An extremely low-latency congestion control for mobile cellular networks

    Shinik Park, Jinsung Lee, Junseon Kim, Jihoon Lee, Sangtae Ha, and Kyunghan Lee. Exll: An extremely low-latency congestion control for mobile cellular networks. InProceedings of the 14th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies, pages 307–319, 2018

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Exstream: A delay- minimized streaming system with explicit frame queueing delay measurement

    Shinik Park, Sanghyun Han, Junseon Kim, Jongyun Lee, Sangtae Ha, and Kyunghan Lee. Exstream: A delay- minimized streaming system with explicit frame queueing delay measurement. InIEEE INFOCOM 2024-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pages 1571–1580. IEEE, 2024

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Understanding O-RAN: Architecture, interfaces, algorithms, security, and research challenges.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 25(2):1376–1411, 2023

    Michele Polese, Leonardo Bonati, Salvatore D’oro, Stefano Basagni, and Tommaso Melodia. Understanding O-RAN: Architecture, interfaces, algorithms, security, and research challenges.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 25(2):1376–1411, 2023

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    5G RM520N-GL

    Quectel. 5G RM520N-GL. [quectel.com]

    work page

  32. [32]

    Vantage: optimizing video upload for time-shifted viewing of social live streams

    Devdeep Ray, Jack Kosaian, KV Rashmi, and Srinivasan Seshan. Vantage: optimizing video upload for time-shifted viewing of social live streams. InProceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, pages 380–393. 2019

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    SQP: Congestion control for low-latency interactive video streaming.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.11857, 2022

    Devdeep Ray, Connor Smith, Teng Wei, David Chu, and Srinivasan Seshan. SQP: Congestion control for low-latency interactive video streaming.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.11857, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Tambur: Efficient loss recovery for videoconferencing via streaming codes

    Michael Rudow, Francis Y Yan, Abhishek Kumar, Ganesh Ananthanarayanan, Martin Ellis, and KV Rashmi. Tambur: Efficient loss recovery for videoconferencing via streaming codes. In20th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 23), pages 953–971, 2023

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    [docs.srsran.com]

    srsRAN. [docs.srsran.com]

    work page

  36. [36]

    Making large scale deployment of RCP practical for real networks

    C-H Tai, Jiang Zhu, and Nandita Dukkipati. Making large scale deployment of RCP practical for real networks. InIEEE INFOCOM 2008-The 27th Conference on Computer Communications, pages 2180–2188. IEEE, 2008

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    tc (8) - Linux manual page.https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/tc.8.html,

    The Linux man-pages project. tc (8) - Linux manual page.https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/tc.8.html,

    work page

  38. [38]

    Accessed: 2024-06-15. 20

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Pudica: Toward near-zero queuing delay in congestion control for cloud gaming

    Shibo Wang, Shusen Yang, Xiao Kong, Chenglei Wu, Longwei Jiang, Chenren Xu, Cong Zhao, Xuesong Yang, Jianjun Xiao, Xin Liu, et al. Pudica: Toward near-zero queuing delay in congestion control for cloud gaming. In 21st USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 24), pages 113–129, 2024

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Youtube UGC dataset for video compression research

    Yilin Wang, Sasi Inguva, and Balu Adsumilli. Youtube UGC dataset for video compression research. In2019 IEEE 21st international workshop on multimedia signal processing (MMSP), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2019

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Internet Speed Requirements for VR Headsets

    Broadband Week. Internet Speed Requirements for VR Headsets. [https://www.broadbandweek.com/internet- speed-requirements-for-vr-headsets/]

    work page

  42. [42]

    piStream: Physical layer informed adaptive video streaming over LTE

    Xiufeng Xie, Xinyu Zhang, Swarun Kumar, and Li Erran Li. piStream: Physical layer informed adaptive video streaming over LTE. InProceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pages 413–425, 2015

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    Accelerating mobile web loading using cellular link information

    Xiufeng Xie, Xinyu Zhang, and Shilin Zhu. Accelerating mobile web loading using cellular link information. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, pages 427–439, 2017

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    PBE-CC: Congestion control via endpoint-centric, physical-layer bandwidth measurements

    Yaxiong Xie, Fan Yi, and Kyle Jamieson. PBE-CC: Congestion control via endpoint-centric, physical-layer bandwidth measurements. InACM SIGCOMM, 2020

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Understanding operational 5G: A first measurement study on its coverage, performance and energy consumption

    Dongzhu Xu, Anfu Zhou, Xinyu Zhang, Guixian Wang, Xi Liu, Congkai An, Yiming Shi, Liang Liu, and Huadong Ma. Understanding operational 5G: A first measurement study on its coverage, performance and energy consumption. InProceedings of the Annual conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication on the applications, technologies, architect...

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Tutti: coupling 5G RAN and mobile edge computing for latency-critical video analytics

    Dongzhu Xu, Anfu Zhou, Guixian Wang, Huanhuan Zhang, Xiangyu Li, Jialiang Pei, and Huadong Ma. Tutti: coupling 5G RAN and mobile edge computing for latency-critical video analytics. InProceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing And Networking, pages 729–742, 2022

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Athena: Seeing and mitigating wireless impact on video conferencing and beyond

    Fan Yi, Haoran Wan, Kyle Jamieson, Jennifer Rexford, Yaxiong Xie, and Oliver Michel. Athena: Seeing and mitigating wireless impact on video conferencing and beyond. InProceedings of the 23rd ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, pages 103–110, 2024

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Habitus: Boosting mobile immersive content delivery through full-body pose tracking and multipath networking

    Anlan Zhang, Chendong Wang, Yuming Hu, Ahmad Hassan, Zejun Zhang, Bo Han, Feng Qian, and Shichang Xu. Habitus: Boosting mobile immersive content delivery through full-body pose tracking and multipath networking. In21st USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 24), 2024

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Learning to coordinate video codec with transport protocol for mobile video telephony

    Anfu Zhou, Huanhuan Zhang, Guangyuan Su, Leilei Wu, Ruoxuan Ma, Zhen Meng, Xinyu Zhang, Xiufeng Xie, Huadong Ma, and Xiaojiang Chen. Learning to coordinate video codec with transport protocol for mobile video telephony. InThe 25th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pages 1–16, 2019

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Zoom system requirements

    Zoom. Zoom system requirements. [https://support.zoom.com/hc]. 21

    work page