pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22478 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · 📡 eess.SP

Time-Frequency Pilot Sequence Design and LoS Delay-Doppler Estimation

Aadarsh Devanand , Praful D. Mankar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 10:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords time-frequency pilot designdelay-Doppler estimationZadoff-Chu sequencesLoS estimationRician fadingtwisted convolutionpilot sequence autocorrelation
0
0 comments X

The pith

New time-frequency pilot sequences and twisted convolution enable direct LoS delay-Doppler estimation that outperforms single-carrier Zadoff-Chu sequences in simulations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops two time-frequency domain pilot sequences modeled on Zadoff-Chu sequences that show strong autocorrelation properties. It introduces a twisted convolution technique to estimate line-of-sight delay and Doppler shifts directly from the received time-frequency signal, eliminating the usual extra step of transforming to the delay-Doppler domain. Simulations in dense scattering environments with Rician fading show the new approach delivers lower estimation errors for both delay and Doppler across many values of fading factor and signal-to-noise ratio. A reader would care because accurate delay-Doppler knowledge supports reliable operation in high-mobility wireless links where scattering is present.

Core claim

The authors design two time-frequency pilot sequences inspired by Zadoff-Chu sequences that exhibit desirable autocorrelation properties and propose a twisted convolution-based estimator to perform LoS delay-Doppler estimation directly from the TF-domain received signal, bypassing the typical TF to DD domain conversion. Numerical simulations in dense scattering environments demonstrate that this approach significantly outperforms traditional single-carrier Zadoff-Chu sequences in both delay and Doppler estimation accuracy over wide ranges of Rician fading factors and SNR values.

What carries the argument

Twisted convolution applied to time-frequency pilot sequences for direct line-of-sight delay-Doppler estimation from the received TF signal

If this is right

  • The proposed TF pilot sequences maintain autocorrelation properties that support accurate parameter estimation.
  • Direct estimation in the TF domain removes the computational overhead of an intermediate TF-to-DD transformation.
  • Estimation performance remains superior across the tested range of Rician fading factors and SNR values.
  • The framework is evaluated specifically for LoS components in dense scattering propagation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Adoption in OFDM-based systems could reduce overall receiver processing load by avoiding domain conversions.
  • Similar sequence designs might be tested for joint communication and sensing tasks in time-varying channels.
  • Hardware impairments such as phase noise or amplifier nonlinearity could be added to simulations to check robustness of the autocorrelation benefits.

Load-bearing premise

The dense scattering propagation environments and Rician fading models used in simulations accurately represent the conditions and impairments encountered in actual wireless deployments.

What would settle it

A hardware experiment or real-world measurement campaign in dense scattering showing no improvement in delay or Doppler estimation accuracy over single-carrier Zadoff-Chu sequences would falsify the claimed performance gains.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22478 by Aadarsh Devanand, Praful D. Mankar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Ambiguity function of a ZC sequence of L = 17. where κ = q K K+1 is a Rician factor representing the strength of the LoS component [11]. HLoS is a matrix with only one non-zero entry at the index corresponding to the delay and Doppler shift of the LoS component, such that HLoS[l, k] = ( P(kT) if (kT, l∆f) = (τLoS, νLoS) 0 otherwise, (7) where P(τ) denotes the power-delay profile [11] of our chan￾nel, which… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: 2D linear and twisted ACFs of separable and stacked ZC view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Normalised Mean Squared Error (NMSE) for the separable, stacked, and 1D ZC sequences. The maximum delay and maximum Doppler in this scenario can be obtained as τmax = 50 µs and νmax = 1.5 kHz, respectively. To design the DD grid over which the channel response H[l, k] is defined, a time bin size of T = 0.5 µs and frequency bin size of ∆f = 10 Hz are considered. This implies the dimension of H[l, k] will be… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a novel framework for line-of-sight (LoS) delay-Doppler (DD) estimation in dense scattering propagation environments. We present two time-frequency (TF) domain pilot sequences inspired by the Zadoff-Chu sequence that exhibit desirable autocorrelation properties. Further, we present a twisted convolution-based approach for LoS DD estimation directly from the TF-domain received signal, avoiding an additional TF to DD transformation, which is commonly found in literature. Numerical results from simulations demonstrate that the proposed framework significantly outperforms traditional single-carrier Zadoff-Chu sequences in both delay and Doppler estimation over a wide range of Rician fading factor and SNR values.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a novel framework for line-of-sight (LoS) delay-Doppler (DD) estimation in dense scattering propagation environments. It introduces two time-frequency (TF) domain pilot sequences inspired by the Zadoff-Chu sequence that exhibit desirable autocorrelation properties, along with a twisted convolution-based estimator for LoS DD estimation directly from the TF-domain received signal, avoiding an explicit TF-to-DD transformation. Numerical simulations are claimed to demonstrate that the proposed framework significantly outperforms traditional single-carrier Zadoff-Chu sequences in both delay and Doppler estimation across a wide range of Rician fading factors and SNR values.

Significance. If the outperformance claim holds under a fair and fully specified comparison, the work could offer a lower-complexity alternative for DD estimation in high-mobility wireless systems by operating directly in the TF domain. The direct estimator and TF pilot construction represent a potentially useful engineering contribution, but the significance remains provisional given the absence of detailed simulation parameters and theoretical analysis.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical Results section] Numerical Results section: The simulation setup lacks specification of the dense scattering channel model, exact definitions of the delay/Doppler MSE metrics, number of Monte-Carlo runs, pilot power normalization, and—critically—how the single-carrier Zadoff-Chu baseline was implemented (e.g., whether it received equivalent TF-domain processing and identical channel realizations as the proposed method). Without these, the reported performance gap cannot be attributed to the pilot design or estimator rather than differences in the evaluation pipeline.
  2. [Estimator description] Twisted-convolution estimator: No explicit derivation, equations, or pseudocode for the twisted-convolution estimator is provided. It is therefore impossible to verify that the estimator correctly extracts LoS DD parameters directly from the TF signal, what assumptions it makes about the Rician component, or whether it is a genuine advance over existing TF-domain techniques.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Replace the qualitative phrase 'significantly outperforms' with quantitative statements (e.g., specific MSE reduction factors or ranges) so readers can immediately gauge the magnitude of the claimed gains.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and additions for improved reproducibility and transparency.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical Results section] Numerical Results section: The simulation setup lacks specification of the dense scattering channel model, exact definitions of the delay/Doppler MSE metrics, number of Monte-Carlo runs, pilot power normalization, and—critically—how the single-carrier Zadoff-Chu baseline was implemented (e.g., whether it received equivalent TF-domain processing and identical channel realizations as the proposed method). Without these, the reported performance gap cannot be attributed to the pilot design or estimator rather than differences in the evaluation pipeline.

    Authors: We agree that the simulation setup requires more complete specification to support the reported performance comparisons. In the revised manuscript we will expand the Numerical Results section with: a full description of the dense scattering channel model (including Rician component parameters and scattering statistics); the precise mathematical definitions of the delay and Doppler MSE metrics; the number of Monte-Carlo realizations employed; the pilot power normalization procedure; and an explicit account of the single-carrier Zadoff-Chu baseline, confirming that it was evaluated with equivalent TF-domain processing and identical channel realizations. These additions will allow the performance differences to be attributed directly to the proposed TF pilot sequences and twisted-convolution estimator. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Estimator description] Twisted-convolution estimator: No explicit derivation, equations, or pseudocode for the twisted-convolution estimator is provided. It is therefore impossible to verify that the estimator correctly extracts LoS DD parameters directly from the TF signal, what assumptions it makes about the Rician component, or whether it is a genuine advance over existing TF-domain techniques.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the derivation and implementation details of the twisted-convolution estimator were insufficiently elaborated. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated subsection containing the full derivation, all governing equations that show how the estimator operates directly on the TF-domain received signal, the modeling assumptions placed on the Rician LoS component, and a pseudocode description of the algorithm. This material will make explicit the avoidance of an explicit TF-to-DD transformation and will clarify the estimator’s relation to prior TF-domain methods. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new TF pilot construction and direct estimator are independent of their performance claims

full rationale

The paper introduces two new TF-domain pilot sequences inspired by Zadoff-Chu and a twisted-convolution estimator that operates directly on the TF received signal. These are presented as explicit constructions whose autocorrelation properties follow from the sequence definition rather than from any fitted parameter or self-referential equation. The outperformance result is obtained solely from Monte-Carlo simulations against a single-carrier ZC baseline; no derivation step equates a claimed prediction to its own input by construction, and no load-bearing premise rests on a self-citation chain. The method is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. The framework implicitly relies on standard properties of Zadoff-Chu sequences and Rician fading models, which are treated as background knowledge rather than new postulates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5407 in / 1172 out tokens · 28421 ms · 2026-05-08T10:19:09.582609+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

14 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Wavelet based approach for joint time delay and doppler stretch measurements,

    X. Niu, P . Ching, and Y . Chan, “Wavelet based approach for joint time delay and doppler stretch measurements,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems , vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1111–1119, 1999

    work page 1999

  2. [2]

    Two-dimensional del ay-doppler pilots and channel estimation for multi-antenna otfs in dou bly dispersive channels,

    Y . Liang, P . Fan, Q. Wang, and X. He, “Two-dimensional del ay-doppler pilots and channel estimation for multi-antenna otfs in dou bly dispersive channels,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 7612–7623, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Direct localization for massive mimo,

    N. Garcia, H. Wymeersch, E. G. Larsson, A. M. Haimovich, a nd M. Coulon, “Direct localization for massive mimo,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 2475–2487, 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    The estimation of time d elay and doppler stretch of wideband signals,

    Q. Jin, K. M. Wong, and Z.-Q. Luo, “The estimation of time d elay and doppler stretch of wideband signals,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 904–916, 1995

    work page 1995

  5. [5]

    Optima l pilot design for channel estimation in single/multicarrier bloc k transmission systems,

    M. Majumder, A. Kudeshia, and A. K. Jagannatham, “Optima l pilot design for channel estimation in single/multicarrier bloc k transmission systems,” in 2017 Twenty-third National Conference on Communications (NCC), 2017, pp. 1–6

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Orthogonal time frequency spa ce modula- tion,

    R. Hadani, S. Rakib, M. Tsatsanis, A. Monk, A. J. Goldsmit h, A. F. Molisch, and R. Calderbank, “Orthogonal time frequency spa ce modula- tion,” in 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Confer- ence (WCNC) , 2017, pp. 1–6

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    V2v meets otfs: Cram´ er-rao bound-based pilot sequence de sign in the delay-doppler domain,

    T. Zhang, A. Liu, X. Liang, K. Pan, X. Lin, Y . Sun, and D. Niy ato, “V2v meets otfs: Cram´ er-rao bound-based pilot sequence de sign in the delay-doppler domain,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology, pp. 1–6, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Pilot signal desi gn via constrained optimization with application to delay-doppler shift esti mation in ofdm systems,

    L. Jing, T. Pedersen, and B. H. Fleury, “Pilot signal desi gn via constrained optimization with application to delay-doppler shift esti mation in ofdm systems,” in 2013 51st Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton) , 2013, pp. 160–166

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    On the use of bj¨ orck sequences in LEO-based PNT systems,

    H. K. Dureppagari, C. Saha, R. M. Buehrer, and H. S. Dhillo n, “On the use of bj¨ orck sequences in LEO-based PNT systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00706, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    A constructive i nversion frame- work for twisted convolution,

    Y . Eldar, E. Matusiak, and T. Werther, “A constructive i nversion frame- work for twisted convolution,” Monatshefte f¨ ur Mathematik, vol. 150, 12 2005

    work page 2005

  11. [11]

    Goldsmith, Wireless Communications

    A. Goldsmith, Wireless Communications. Cambridge University Press, 2005

    work page 2005

  12. [12]

    A primer on zadoff chu sequences,

    J. G. Andrews, “A primer on zadoff chu sequences,” 2022

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Channel estimatio n with zad- off–chu sequences in the presence of phase errors,

    S. Wittig, M. Peter, and W. Keusgen, “Channel estimatio n with zad- off–chu sequences in the presence of phase errors,” Electronics Letters, vol. 59, no. 20, p. e12996, 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Partial-period correlations of zadoff–chu se- quences and their relatives,

    T.-K. Lee and K. Y ang, “Partial-period correlations of zadoff–chu se- quences and their relatives,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 5791–5802, 2014

    work page 2014