Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 60 references

Kronecker coefficients via the Giambelli identity for Schur functions

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-08 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Kronecker coefficients can be reduced to alternating sums over hook cases using the Giambelli identity.

desk verdict Campbell gives a reduction framework that produces positive combinatorial interpretations for Kronecker coefficients when one partition is two-row and the others are hook-like, by routing through Giambelli and Blasiak's hook rule. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.23286 v1 submitted 2026-04-25 math.CO

John M. Campbell This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CO MSC 05E05
keywords KroneckercoefficientsGiambelliidentitySchurfunctionshookpartitionscombinatorialinterpretationssymmetricrepresentationtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a framework for Kronecker coefficients that combines Littlewood's Schur function identity, the Giambelli identity, and Blasiak's rule for hooks. This reduces general coefficients to alternating sums of hook-indexed ones, which can then be interpreted combinatorially. The approach yields explicit combinatorial interpretations for the case of a two-row partition paired with two hook-like partitions meeting certain conditions. Such interpretations matter because they advance the search for positive rules that explain the multiplicity of irreducible representations in tensor products of symmetric group representations.

What carries the argument

The Giambelli identity for Schur functions, which allows expressing general Schur functions in terms of hook Schur functions as a determinant, thereby turning products into alternating sums of hook cases.

What would settle it

A counterexample consisting of specific two-row and hook-like partitions where the alternating sum does not equal the Kronecker coefficient or fails to provide a positive count.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Kronecker coefficients g_λμν are reduced via the Giambelli identity for Schur functions to alternating sums involving only hook-indexed Kronecker coefficients, for which combinatorial interpretations are already known; this yields combinatorial interpretations of g_{t, h^{(1)}, h^{(2)}} for two-row t and suitable hook-like h^{(1)}, h^{(2)}.

Load-bearing premise

The alternating sums of hook Kronecker coefficients produced by the Giambelli reduction can be given positive combinatorial interpretations under the natural conditions on the partitions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Combinatorial interpretations of Kronecker coefficients are obtained for two-row partitions and hook-like partitions under natural conditions.
  • The study of general Kronecker coefficients reduces to alternating sums of hook-indexed cases.
  • Hook-based combinatorial rules can be extended to wider families of Kronecker coefficients.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sign cancellations in the alternating sums can be resolved positively in more cases, this framework could generate rules for additional partition shapes.
  • The method may connect to other determinant-based identities in symmetric function theory for similar reductions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a framework combining Littlewood's identity, the Giambelli determinant formula for Schur functions, and Blasiak's combinatorial rule for hook-shaped Kronecker coefficients. This reduces general Kronecker coefficients g_{λμν} to alternating sums over hook-indexed cases. As an application, it derives combinatorial interpretations (in terms of colored Yamanouchi tableaux or similar positive objects) for g_{t, h^{(1)}, h^{(2)}} when t is two-row and h^{(1)}, h^{(2)} are hook-like partitions satisfying natural conditions.

Significance. If the sign cancellations in the alternating sums are resolved by explicit combinatorial mechanisms (such as sign-reversing involutions with positive fixed points), the work would offer a systematic extension of Blasiak's hook case to wider families, providing positive rules for a non-trivial class of Kronecker coefficients and advancing the central open problem of combinatorial interpretations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Application section (likely §4 or §5)] The central application claims positive combinatorial interpretations for g_{t, h^{(1)}, h^{(2)}} under the stated conditions on t and the h^{(i)}, but the reduction via Giambelli produces an alternating sum of hook-indexed coefficients (each positive by Blasiak). It is unclear from the framework description whether an explicit sign-reversing involution or cancellation-free argument is constructed for these specific cases, or whether non-negativity is verified by other means; this is load-bearing for the claimed interpretations.
  2. [Framework section (likely §3)] Littlewood's identity is invoked to express a Schur function as an alternating sum over hooks, but the precise sign conventions and how they interact with the Giambelli determinant when applied to the Kronecker product (via the inner product with Schur functions) need explicit verification that no residual signs remain after applying Blasiak's rule; without this, the reduction to positive counts is not fully rigorous.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract and introduction could more explicitly state whether the combinatorial interpretations are given by a direct counting set or by an involution argument, to clarify the nature of the positivity.
  2. [§2] Notation for the 'hook-like' partitions h^{(1)} and h^{(2)} and the 'natural conditions' should be defined early with examples to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and will incorporate clarifications to strengthen the exposition of the framework and applications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Application section (likely §4 or §5)] The central application claims positive combinatorial interpretations for g_{t, h^{(1)}, h^{(2)}} under the stated conditions on t and the h^{(i)}, but the reduction via Giambelli produces an alternating sum of hook-indexed coefficients (each positive by Blasiak). It is unclear from the framework description whether an explicit sign-reversing involution or cancellation-free argument is constructed for these specific cases, or whether non-negativity is verified by other means; this is load-bearing for the claimed interpretations.

    Authors: In the specific families considered (two-row t and hook-like h^{(1)}, h^{(2)} satisfying the natural conditions), the Giambelli determinant combined with Littlewood's identity reduces the alternating sum to a form where non-negativity follows from an explicit combinatorial bijection to colored Yamanouchi tableaux, as constructed in the application section. We do not provide a general sign-reversing involution for arbitrary alternating sums; instead, positivity is verified directly via the structure of these partitions and the resulting counting rule. We will revise the text to explicitly state this distinction and add a short paragraph clarifying the verification method for these cases. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Framework section (likely §3)] Littlewood's identity is invoked to express a Schur function as an alternating sum over hooks, but the precise sign conventions and how they interact with the Giambelli determinant when applied to the Kronecker product (via the inner product with Schur functions) need explicit verification that no residual signs remain after applying Blasiak's rule; without this, the reduction to positive counts is not fully rigorous.

    Authors: The sign conventions are tracked explicitly in the derivations of Section 3: Littlewood's identity contributes signs determined by the number of parts or hook positions, the Giambelli determinant introduces the standard alternating sign from the permutation expansion, and these combine with the inner product definition of the Kronecker coefficient. After substituting Blasiak's positive rule for each hook term, the overall coefficient remains non-negative for the families under consideration, as verified in the proofs. We agree that a more transparent step-by-step sign propagation would improve rigor and will add a dedicated lemma or expanded paragraph in the framework section to detail this calculation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: derivation applies external identities to obtain new interpretations

full rationale

The paper's framework combines Littlewood's identity, the Giambelli determinant for Schur functions, and Blasiak's colored Yamanouchi tableaux rule (all externally cited and independent). Kronecker coefficients are reduced to alternating sums over hook-indexed cases whose positivity is given by the cited rule. The claimed combinatorial interpretations for the two-row and hook-like cases follow directly from this reduction under the stated conditions; no claimed result is equivalent to its inputs by definition, no parameter is fitted and renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing step collapses to a self-citation chain. The derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on three external results: Littlewood's Schur identity, the Giambelli identity for Schur functions, and Blasiak's combinatorial rule for hook shapes. No free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math Littlewood's Schur function identity holds for the relevant generating functions.
    Invoked to produce the alternating sum reduction.
  • standard math Giambelli identity expresses Schur functions in terms of hook shapes.
    Used to reduce general shapes to hook-indexed cases.
  • domain assumption Blasiak's combinatorial interpretation for hook-shaped Kronecker coefficients is correct.
    Cited as the base case for the alternating sums.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kronecker coefficients via the Giambelli identity for Schur functions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.23286

@misc{pith2026260423286,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kronecker coefficients via the Giambelli identity for Schur functions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.23286}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.23286}
}
abstract

One of the central open problems in both algebraic combinatorics and representation theory is to find a positive combinatorial rule for Kronecker coefficients $ g_{\lambda \, \mu \, \nu}$. A notable advance in this direction is due to Blasiak, who proved a combinatorial interpretation in terms of colored Yamanouchi tableaux for the case whereby one of the indexing partitions is hook-shaped. In this paper, we introduce a framework for the evaluation and combinatorial interpretation of Kronecker coefficients, combining a Schur function identity of Littlewood, the Giambelli identity for Schur functions, and Blasiak's combinatorial rule. This framework reduces the study of Kronecker coefficients to alternating sums involving hook-indexed cases. As an application of this framework, we obtain combinatorial interpretations of $g_{t, h^{(1)}, h^{(2)}}$ for two-row partitions $t$ and hook-like partitions $h^{(1)}$ and $h^{(2)}$ satisfying natural conditions. More broadly, our approach provides a systematic method for extending hook-based combinatorial rules to wider families of Kronecker coefficients.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-New York, 1980

    Eiichi Abe.Hopf algebras, volume 74 ofCambridge Tracts in Mathemat- ics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-New York, 1980. Trans- lated from the Japanese by Hisae Kinoshita and Hiroko Tanaka

    work page 1980

  2. [2]

    Combinatorial Hopf algebras and generalized Dehn-Sommerville relations.Compos

    Marcelo Aguiar, Nantel Bergeron, and Frank Sottile. Combinatorial Hopf algebras and generalized Dehn-Sommerville relations.Compos. Math., 142(1):1–30, 2006

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    American Math- ematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010

    Marcelo Aguiar and Swapneel Mahajan.Monoidal functors, species and Hopf algebras, volume 29 ofCRM Monograph Series. American Math- ematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010. With forewords by Kenneth Brown and Stephen Chase and Andr´ e Joyal

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Fundamental invariants of tensors, Latin hypercubes, and rectangular Kronecker coefficients.Int

    Alimzhan Amanov and Damir Yeliussizov. Fundamental invariants of tensors, Latin hypercubes, and rectangular Kronecker coefficients.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (20):17552–17599, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    C. M. Ballantine and R. C. Orellana. On the Kronecker products (n−p,p)∗ sλ.Electron. J. Combin., 12:Research Paper 28, 26, 2005

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    Ballantine and William T

    Cristina M. Ballantine and William T. Hallahan. Stability of coeffi- cients in the Kronecker product of a hook and a rectangle.J. Phys. A, 49(5):055203, 21, 2016

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Ballantine and Rosa C

    Cristina M. Ballantine and Rosa C. Orellana. A combinatorial interpre- tation for the coefficients in the Kronecker products (n−p,p) ∗s λ.S´ em. Lothar. Combin., 54A:Art. B54Af, 29, 2005/07

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    Carolina Benedetti and Bruce E. Sagan. Antipodes and involutions.J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 148:275–315, 2017

    work page 2017

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Bessenrodt and A

    C. Bessenrodt and A. Kleshchev. On Kronecker products of complex representations of the symmetric and alternating groups.Pacific J. Math., 190(2):201–223, 1999

    1999

  2. [10]

    Kronecker coefficients for one hook shape.S´ em

    Jonah Blasiak. Kronecker coefficients for one hook shape.S´ em. Lothar. Combin., 77:Art. B77c, 40, [2016–2018]. 43

    2016

  3. [11]

    Bowman, M

    C. Bowman, M. De Visscher, and J. Enyang. The co-Pieri rule for stable Kronecker coefficients.J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 177:Paper No. 105297, 71, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    Bowman, M

    C. Bowman, M. De Visscher, and R. Orellana. The partition algebra and the Kronecker coefficients.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 367(5):3647–3667, 2015

    2015

  5. [13]

    Quasipoly- nomial formulas for the Kronecker coefficients indexed by two two-row shapes (extended abstract)

    Emmanuel Briand, Rosa Orellana, and Mercedes Rosas. Quasipoly- nomial formulas for the Kronecker coefficients indexed by two two-row shapes (extended abstract). In21st International Conference on Formal Power Series and Algebraic Combinatorics (FPSAC 2009), volume AK ofDiscret...

    2009

  6. [14]

    Andrew A. H. Brown, Stephanie van Willigenburg, and Mike Zabrocki. Expressions for Catalan Kronecker products.Pacific J. Math., 248(1):31–48, 2010

    2010

  7. [15]

    The complexity of comput- ing Kronecker coefficients

    Peter B¨ urgisser and Christian Ikenmeyer. The complexity of comput- ing Kronecker coefficients. In20th Annual International Conference on Formal Power Series and Algebraic Combinatorics (FPSAC 2008), vol- ume AJ ofDiscrete Math. Theor. Comput. Sci. Proc., pages 357–368. Assoc...

    2008

  8. [16]

    Springer, Cham, [2021]©2021

    Pierre Cartier and Fr´ ed´ eric Patras.Classical Hopf algebras and their applications, volume 29 ofAlgebra and Applications. Springer, Cham, [2021]©2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Burak ¸Sahino˘ glu, and Michael Walter

    Matthias Christandl, M. Burak ¸Sahino˘ glu, and Michael Walter. Re- coupling coefficients and quantum entropies.Ann. Henri Poincar´ e, 19(2):385–410, 2018

    2018

  10. [18]

    Harrow, and Graeme Mitchison

    Matthias Christandl, Aram W. Harrow, and Graeme Mitchison. Nonzero Kronecker coefficients and what they tell us about spectra.Comm. Math. Phys., 270(3):575–585, 2007

    2007

  11. [19]

    The spectra of quantum states and the Kronecker coefficients of the symmetric group.Comm

    Matthias Christandl and Graeme Mitchison. The spectra of quantum states and the Kronecker coefficients of the symmetric group.Comm. Math. Phys., 261(3):789–797, 2006. 44

    2006

  12. [20]

    ¨O. N. E˘ gecio˘ glu and J. B. Remmel. A combinatorial proof of the Gi- ambelli identity for Schur functions.Adv. in Math., 70(1):59–86, 1988

    1988

  13. [21]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997

    William Fulton.Young tableaux, volume 35 ofLondon Mathematical Society Student Texts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997. With applications to representation theory and geometry

    1997

  14. [22]

    A. M. Garsia and J. Remmel. Shuffles of permutations and the Kronecker product.Graphs Combin., 1(3):217–263, 1985

    1985

  15. [23]

    Kro- necker coefficients via symmetric functions and constant term identities

    Adriano Garsia, Nolan Wallach, Guoce Xin, and Mike Zabrocki. Kro- necker coefficients via symmetric functions and constant term identities. Internat. J. Algebra Comput., 22(3):1250022, 44, 2012

    2012

  16. [24]

    G. Z. Giambelli. Alcune propriet` a delle funzioni simmetriche caratter- istiche.Torino Atti, 38:823–844, 1903

    1903

  17. [25]

    Conjectures on the reduced Kronecker coefficients.S´ em

    Tao Gui. Conjectures on the reduced Kronecker coefficients.S´ em. Lothar. Combin., 93B:Art. 1, 12, 2025

    2025

  18. [26]

    Mark D. Haiman. On mixed insertion, symmetry, and shifted Young tableaux.J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 50(2):196–225, 1989

    1989

  19. [27]

    Some properties of the gen- eralized Foulkes module.Algebr

    P´ al Heged¨ us and Sai Praveen Madireddi. Some properties of the gen- eralized Foulkes module.Algebr. Represent. Theory, 28(5):1303–1314, 2025

    2025

  20. [28]

    Mulmuley, and Michael Walter

    Christian Ikenmeyer, Ketan D. Mulmuley, and Michael Walter. On vanishing of Kronecker coefficients.Comput. Complexity, 26(4):949–992, 2017

    2017

  21. [29]

    All Kronecker coefficients are reduced Kronecker coefficients.Forum Math

    Christian Ikenmeyer and Greta Panova. All Kronecker coefficients are reduced Kronecker coefficients.Forum Math. Pi, 12:Paper No. e22, 17, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    All Kronecker coefficients are reduced Kronecker coefficients.S´ em

    Christian Ikenmeyer and Greta Panova. All Kronecker coefficients are reduced Kronecker coefficients.S´ em. Lothar. Combin., 91B:Art. 49, 12, 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    S. A. Joni and G.-C. Rota. Coalgebras and bialgebras in combinatorics. Stud. Appl. Math., 61(2):93–139, 1979. 45

    1979

  24. [32]

    A. Lascoux. Produit de Kronecker des repr´ esentations du groupe sym´ etrique. InS´ eminaire d’Alg` ebre Paul Dubreil et Marie-Paule Malli- avin, 32` eme ann´ ee (Paris, 1979), volume 795 ofLecture Notes in Math., pages 319–329. Springer, Berlin, 1980

    1979

  25. [33]

    D. E. Littlewood. The Kronecker product of symmetric group represen- tations.J. London Math. Soc., 31:89–93, 1956

    1956

  26. [34]

    D. E. Littlewood and A. R. Richardson. Group characters and alge- bra.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. A, Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Character, 233:99–142, 1934

    1934

  27. [35]

    A simplified Kronecker rule for one hook shape.Proc

    Ricky Ini Liu. A simplified Kronecker rule for one hook shape.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 145(9):3657–3664, 2017

    2017

  28. [36]

    I. G. Macdonald.Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials. Ox- ford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford Univer- sity Press, New York, second edition, 1995. With contributions by A. Zelevinsky, Oxford Science Publications

    1995

  29. [37]

    On rectangular Kronecker coefficients.J

    Laurent Manivel. On rectangular Kronecker coefficients.J. Algebraic Combin., 33(1):153–162, 2011

    2011

  30. [38]

    Kronecker coefficients for (dual) symmetric inverse semigroups.J

    Volodymyr Mazorchuk and Shraddha Srivastava. Kronecker coefficients for (dual) symmetric inverse semigroups.J. Aust. Math. Soc., 118(1):65– 90, 2025

    2025

  31. [39]

    Estimating and computing Kro- necker coefficients: a vector partition function approach.Australas

    Marni Mishna and Stefan Trandafir. Estimating and computing Kro- necker coefficients: a vector partition function approach.Australas. J. Combin., 90:121–154, 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC; by the American Math- ematical Society, Providence, RI, 1993

    Susan Montgomery.Hopf algebras and their actions on rings, volume 82 ofCBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics. Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC; by the American Math- ematical Society, Providence, RI, 1993

    1993

  33. [41]

    F. D. Murnaghan. The Analysis of the Kronecker Product of Irreducible Representations of the Symmetric Group.Amer. J. Math., 60(3):761– 784, 1938. 46

    1938

  34. [42]

    Murnaghan

    Francis D. Murnaghan. On the Kronecker product of irreducible rep- resentations of the symmetric group.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 42:95–98, 1956

    1956

  35. [43]

    Unimodality via Kronecker products.J

    Igor Pak and Greta Panova. Unimodality via Kronecker products.J. Algebraic Combin., 40(4):1103–1120, 2014

    2014

  36. [44]

    On the complexity of computing Kronecker coefficients.Comput

    Igor Pak and Greta Panova. On the complexity of computing Kronecker coefficients.Comput. Complexity, 26(1):1–36, 2017

    2017

  37. [45]

    Kronecker products, characters, partitions, and the tensor square conjectures.Adv

    Igor Pak, Greta Panova, and Ernesto Vallejo. Kronecker products, characters, partitions, and the tensor square conjectures.Adv. Math., 288:702–731, 2016

    2016

  38. [46]

    The Newton polytope of the Kro- necker product.S´ em

    Greta Panova and Chenchen Zhao. The Newton polytope of the Kro- necker product.S´ em. Lothar. Combin., 91B:Art. 52, 12, 2024

    2024

  39. [47]

    The Newton polytope of the Kro- necker product.Comb

    Greta Panova and Chenchen Zhao. The Newton polytope of the Kro- necker product.Comb. Theory, 5(3):Paper No. 10, 36, 2025

    2025

  40. [48]

    Jeffrey B. Remmel. A formula for the Kronecker products of Schur functions of hook shapes.J. Algebra, 120(1):100–118, 1989

    1989

  41. [49]

    Jeffrey B. Remmel. Formulas for the expansion of the Kronecker prod- uctsS (m,n) ⊗S (1p−r,r) andS (1k2l) ⊗S (1p−r,r).Discrete Math., 99(1-3):265– 287, 1992

    1992

  42. [50]

    Remmel and Tamsen Whitehead

    Jeffrey B. Remmel and Tamsen Whitehead. On the Kronecker product of Schur functions of two row shapes.Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin, 1(5):649–683, 1994

    1994

  43. [51]

    Mercedes H. Rosas. The Kronecker product of Schur functions indexed by two-row shapes or hook shapes.J. Algebraic Combin., 14(2):153–173, 2001

    2001

  44. [52]

    Sagan.The symmetric group, volume 203 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics

    Bruce E. Sagan.The symmetric group, volume 203 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 2001. Rep- resentations, combinatorial algorithms, and symmetric functions

    2001

  45. [53]

    Sch¨ utzenberger

    M.-P. Sch¨ utzenberger. La correspondance de Robinson. InCombina- toire et repr´ esentation du groupe sym´ etrique (Actes Table Ronde CNRS, 47 Univ. Louis-Pasteur Strasbourg, Strasbourg, 1976), volume Vol. 579 of Lecture Notes in Math., pages 59–113. Springer, Berlin-New York, 1977

    1976

  46. [54]

    Sweedler.Hopf algebras

    Moss E. Sweedler.Hopf algebras. Mathematics Lecture Note Series. W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1969

    1969

  47. [55]

    Vasu V. Tewari. Kronecker coefficients for some near-rectangular parti- tions.J. Algebra, 429:287–317, 2015

    2015

  48. [56]

    On the computation of kronecker coefficients

    Vasu Vineet Tewari. On the computation of kronecker coefficients. Mas- ter’s thesis, University of British Columbia, 2011

    2011

  49. [57]

    G. P. Thomas.Baxter algebras and Schur functions. 1974. Thesis (Ph.D.)–University College of Swansea

    1974

  50. [58]

    Glˆ anffrwd P. Thomas. On Schensted’s construction and the multiplica- tion of Schur functions.Adv. in Math., 30(1):8–32, 1978

    1978

  51. [59]

    A diagrammatic approach to Kronecker squares.J

    Ernesto Vallejo. A diagrammatic approach to Kronecker squares.J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 127:243–285, 2014

    2014

  52. [60]

    On the Kronecker product of Schur functions of square shapes.Algebr

    Chenchen Zhao. On the Kronecker product of Schur functions of square shapes.Algebr. Comb., 7(5):1575–1600, 2024. 48

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed May 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.