arxiv: 2604.23373 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-25 · 💻 cs.NI

Recognition: unknown

Sharing-oriented Resource Allocation for Multi-platoon's Groupcasting and Unicasting Communication based on the Transmission Reliability

Chung-Ming Huang , Yen-Hung Wu , Duy-Tuan Dao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 07:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NI

keywords resource allocationvehicular platoonsgroupcastingunicastingtripartite matchingspectral efficiency5G networkstransmission reliability

0 comments

The pith

Resource sharing via tripartite matching improves QoS satisfaction and spectral efficiency for 5G platoon groupcasting and unicasting.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that sharing subchannels between platoon transmitters and other vehicles using tripartite matching supports reliable groupcasting from leaders or relays and unicasting from members in multi-platoon scenarios. A sympathetic reader would care because high mobility and scarce spectrum make it hard to deliver control messages without wasting resources or dropping reliability. If the methods work, platoons can meet transmission needs with fewer subchannels overall while maintaining better quality of service than non-sharing approaches.

Core claim

The TMPG algorithm matches a platoon leader or relay vehicle with an individual entity and a subchannel for groupcasting based on reliability requirements, while the RSPU algorithm first clusters platoon members to limit interference and then applies similar tripartite matching for unicasting. Both methods enable controlled resource sharing between platoons and cellular or non-platoon users. Simulation results show these algorithms deliver higher QoS satisfaction rates, allocate fewer subchannels, and achieve greater spectral efficiency than benchmark schemes.

What carries the argument

Tripartite matching, which jointly pairs a platoon-side transmitter (leader, relay, or member cluster) with an individual entity and a subchannel to enable sharing while satisfying reliability thresholds.

If this is right

Platoon control messages maintain higher reliability when spectrum is shared with surrounding vehicles.
Overall subchannel consumption drops for the same number of platoons and members.
Spectral efficiency rises because each allocated resource serves both a platoon entity and an individual user.
The same reliability-driven allocation logic applies to both group dissemination and point-to-point emergency messages.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The clustering step in unicasting could extend to other interference-limited group transmissions such as coordinated vehicle convoys.
If matching latency stays low, the framework might integrate with predictive route data to pre-assign resources before positions change.
Sharing with non-platoon traffic opens a path to mixed traffic management where platoons and ordinary vehicles compete more fairly for spectrum.

Load-bearing premise

The simulation model of vehicle mobility, interference, and channel conditions accurately represents real multi-platoon scenarios and the matching process completes with acceptable latency under high mobility.

What would settle it

A real-world highway experiment with multiple instrumented platoons in which the proposed methods show lower QoS satisfaction or more subchannels used than the benchmarks would disprove the claimed gains.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23373 by Chung-Ming Huang, Duy-Tuan Dao, Yen-Hung Wu.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: An example of the platooning configuration view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: (a) The graph of Equation (19), which shows that ∫ 𝑒 ∞ ି௫ ଴ = 1; (b) the graph of Equation (9), where the gray area represents the probability value of Equation (9) view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: An example input of the TMPG algorithm view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Resource allocation in vehicular platoons is challenging due to high vehicle mobility and limited spectrum resources. To improve spectral efficiency, resource sharing is commonly adopted. In 5G-based platoons, the Platoon Leader Vehicle (PLV) employs groupcasting to disseminate control messages to Platoon Member Vehicles (PMVs). When the groupcasting power is insufficient, a selected PMV acts as a Platoon Relay Vehicle (PRV) to extend the communication range. In addition, PMVs transmit unicast control messages to the vehicles following them for emergency coordination. This work proposes a sharing-oriented resource allocation method for both groupcasting and unicasting communication based on transmission reliability. For groupcasting, the proposed Tripartite Matching for Platoon Groupcasting (TMPG) algorithm applies tripartite matching to allocate subchannels shared by a PLV/PRV and corresponding individual entities (IEs), which denote cellular users or non-platooning vehicles. For unicasting, the proposed Resource Sharing for Platoons Unicasting (RSPU) algorithm (i) firstly partitions PMVs into clusters by considering intra-cluster interference and then (ii) uses tripartite matching to allocate a subchannel that is shared by a cluster of PMVs and the corresponding IE. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed methods outperform benchmark schemes in terms of Quality of Service (QoS) satisfaction, the number of allocated subchannels, and spectral efficiency.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

TMPG and RSPU apply tripartite matching to shared subchannel allocation for platoon groupcasting and clustered unicasting, with simulation gains that look plausible but rest on limited validation details.

read the letter

The main point is that this paper takes tripartite matching and puts it to work on resource sharing between platoons and individual entities in 5G vehicular settings. TMPG handles groupcasting from PLVs or PRVs, while RSPU first clusters PMVs to control interference then matches clusters for unicasting. The utilities are built from reliability constraints, so the formulation stays connected to the QoS targets rather than floating free. They also make the sharing with cellular users or non-platoon vehicles explicit, which is a practical touch for spectrum efficiency.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes TMPG, a tripartite matching algorithm for allocating shared subchannels to PLV/PRV groupcasting with individual entities (IEs), and RSPU, which first partitions PMVs into interference-aware clusters and then applies tripartite matching for unicasting subchannel sharing with IEs. It claims that these sharing-oriented methods improve QoS satisfaction, number of allocated subchannels, and spectral efficiency over benchmark schemes in 5G vehicular platoon scenarios.

Significance. If the simulation results are robust, the work provides a concrete matching-based framework for reliable resource sharing in high-mobility platoons, addressing spectrum scarcity while incorporating reliability constraints and interference; the explicit handling of PRV relay selection and intra-cluster partitioning is a strength that could inform practical V2X deployments.

major comments (1)

[Simulation Results] Simulation results section: the outperformance claims on QoS satisfaction, allocated subchannels, and spectral efficiency rest on unspecified simulation details (no mention of Monte Carlo run count, error bars, statistical significance tests, or validation of the mobility/interference/channel models against real multi-platoon traces), which is load-bearing for the central empirical claim.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3: the tripartite matching utility functions are described conceptually but would benefit from an explicit equation reference showing how reliability constraints enter the preference lists.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the simulation results. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to enhance the robustness and reproducibility of the empirical evaluation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Simulation results section: the outperformance claims on QoS satisfaction, allocated subchannels, and spectral efficiency rest on unspecified simulation details (no mention of Monte Carlo run count, error bars, statistical significance tests, or validation of the mobility/interference/channel models against real multi-platoon traces), which is load-bearing for the central empirical claim.

Authors: We agree that the original manuscript did not provide sufficient simulation details, which weakens the presentation of the central claims. In the revised version, we will explicitly state that all results are obtained from 1000 independent Monte Carlo runs, add error bars (95% confidence intervals) to all figures, and report statistical significance via paired t-tests (p < 0.05) comparing TMPG/RSPU against benchmarks. The mobility model follows the 3GPP TR 37.885 platoon dynamics, the channel model uses the WINNER II path-loss and fading parameters standard for V2X, and interference is computed from distance-dependent path loss plus log-normal shadowing as in prior platoon literature; we will expand Section V with these justifications and citations. Direct validation against real multi-platoon traces is not possible here, as no matching public datasets exist for the considered groupcasting/unicasting scenarios with PRV relay selection; we will add a limitations paragraph noting this and recommending it for future work. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved

Validation of the mobility/interference/channel models against real multi-platoon traces

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The manuscript proposes algorithmic methods (TMPG for groupcasting via tripartite matching and RSPU for unicasting via clustering plus matching) whose performance is evaluated exclusively through simulation against external benchmarks. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or self-citations appear in the abstract or described content that would reduce any claimed result to an input by construction. The utility functions and matching steps are defined from reliability constraints and interference considerations in a manner that remains independent of the final performance metrics reported.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5561 in / 1135 out tokens · 35902 ms · 2026-05-08T07:06:07.415676+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

[1]

Liu, G., Hu, J., Ma, Z., Fan, P., & Yu, F. R. Joint Optimization of Communication Latency and Platoon Control Based on Uplink RSMA for Future V2X Networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2025; doi: 10.1109/TVT.2025.3560709

work page doi:10.1109/tvt.2025.3560709 2025
[2]

Optimal trace distance and fidelity estimations for pure quantum states

Braiteh, F. E., Bassi, F., & Khatoun, R. Platooning in Connected Vehicles: A Review of Current Solutions, Standardization Activities, Cybersecurity, and Research Opportunities. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 2024; 1-23, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/TIV.2024.3447916

work page doi:10.1109/tiv.2024.3447916 2024
[3]

Compensation control of commercial vehicle platoon considering communication delay and response lag

Liu, H., Chu, D., Zhong, W., Gao, B., Lu, Y., Han, S., & Lei, W. Compensation control of commercial vehicle platoon considering communication delay and response lag. Computers and Electrical Engineering 2024;, 119, 109623,

2024
[4]

A Dynamic Pricing-based Offloading and Resource Allocation Scheme With Data Security for Vehicle Platoon

Yang, Y., Yu, H., Zhao, Y., Chen, M., Du, J., & Ren, Y. A Dynamic Pricing-based Offloading and Resource Allocation Scheme With Data Security for Vehicle Platoon. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 2024; 12(6), 7149-7163, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2024.3492694

work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3492694 2024
[5]

Platoon cooperation in cellular V2X networks for 5G and beyond

Wang, P., Di, B., Zhang, H., Bian, K., & Song, L. Platoon cooperation in cellular V2X networks for 5G and beyond. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 2019; 18(8), 3919-3932. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/TWC.2019.2919602

work page doi:10.1109/twc.2019.2919602 2019
[6]

M., Lam, D

Huang, C. M., Lam, D. N., & Dao, D. T. A Hypergraph Matching-Based Subchannel Allocation for Multi-Platoon’s Communications. IEEE Access 2023; 11, 139345-139365., http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3335838

work page doi:10.1109/access.2023.3335838 2023
[7]

Z. Dong, X. Zhu, Y. Jiang, and H. Zeng, Manager Selection and Resource Allocation for 5G-V2X Platoon Systems with Finite Blocklength, In 2021 IEEE Wireless Communication Network Conference (WCNC), Nanjing, China, 1–6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WCNC49053.2021.9417291

work page doi:10.1109/wcnc49053.2021.9417291 2021
[8]

Resource allocation for D2D-enabled communications in vehicle platooning

Wang, R., Wu, J., & Yan, J. Resource allocation for D2D-enabled communications in vehicle platooning. IEEE Access 2018; 6, 50526- 50537.. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2868839

work page doi:10.1109/access.2018.2868839 2018
[9]

Task offloading and resource allocation in UAV-assisted vehicle platoon system

Zhao, P., Kuang, Z., Guo, Y., & Hou, F. Task offloading and resource allocation in UAV-assisted vehicle platoon system. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2025; 74(1), 1584-1596, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2024.3458973

work page doi:10.1109/tvt.2024.3458973 2025
[10]

Hypergraph based resource allocation and interference management for multi-platoon in vehicular networks

Cui, H., Xu, L., Wei, Q., & Wang, L. Hypergraph based resource allocation and interference management for multi-platoon in vehicular networks. In 2020 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC) 2020; 853-857. IEEE

2020
[11]

Resource allocation in 5G platoon communication: Modeling, analysis and optimization

Cao, L., Roy, S., & Yin, H. Resource allocation in 5G platoon communication: Modeling, analysis and optimization. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2022; 72(4), 5035-5048

2022
[12]

Longitudinal control-oriented spectrum sharing based on C-V2X for vehicle platoons

Han, Q., Liu, C., Yang, H., & Zuo, Z. Longitudinal control-oriented spectrum sharing based on C-V2X for vehicle platoons. IEEE Systems Journal 2022; 17(1), 1125-1136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2022.3201816

work page doi:10.1109/jsyst.2022.3201816 2022
[13]

3GPP, Study on NR Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X), 2019, TR 38.885 V16.0.0

2019
[14]

A., Mozelli, L

Silva, E. A., Mozelli, L. A., Neto, A. A., & Souza, F. O. Disturbance and uncertainty compensation control for heterogeneous platoons under network delays. Computers and Electrical Engineering 2025; 123, 110066, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109623

work page doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109623 2025
[15]

Resource allocation for dynamic platoon digital twin networks: A multi- agent deep reinforcement learning method

Wang, L., Liang, H., Mao, G., Zhao, D., Liu, Q., Yao, Y., & Zhang, H. Resource allocation for dynamic platoon digital twin networks: A multi- agent deep reinforcement learning method. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2024; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/TVT.2024.3414447

work page doi:10.1109/tvt.2024.3414447 2024
[16]

HierNet: A Hierarchical Resource Allocation Method for Vehicle Platooning Networks

Fu, X., Yuan, Q., Luo, G., Cheng, N., Li, Y., Wang, J., & Liao, J. HierNet: A Hierarchical Resource Allocation Method for Vehicle Platooning Networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 2024; 11(24), 39579-39592. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2024.3444044

work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3444044 2024
[17]

Coordinated Computing Resource Allocation With Efficiency Maximization in Heterogeneous Platoon Edge Network

Zhu, S., Meng, K., Wang, R., & Li, D. Coordinated Computing Resource Allocation With Efficiency Maximization in Heterogeneous Platoon Edge Network. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2024; 25(11),15809-15826, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2024.3435760

work page doi:10.1109/tits.2024.3435760 2024
[18]

Deep reinforcement learning for multi-objective resource allocation in multi-platoon cooperative vehicular networks

Xu, Y., Zhu, K., Xu, H., & Ji, J. Deep reinforcement learning for multi-objective resource allocation in multi-platoon cooperative vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 2023; 22(9), 6185-6198. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/TWC.2023.3240425

work page doi:10.1109/twc.2023.3240425 2023
[19]

Wen, Q., & Hu, B. J. Joint optimal relay selection and power control for reliable broadcast communication in platoon. In 2020 IEEE 92nd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Fall) 2020; 1-6. IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/VTC2020-Fall49728.2020.9348438

work page doi:10.1109/vtc2020-fall49728.2020.9348438 2020
[20]

A joint design of platoon communication and control based on LTE-V2V

Hong, C., Shan, H., Song, M., Zhuang, W., Xiang, Z., & Wu, Y. . A joint design of platoon communication and control based on LTE-V2V. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2020; 69(12), 15893–15907. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2020.3037239

work page doi:10.1109/tvt.2020.3037239 2020
[21]

Efficient groupcast schemes for vehicle platooning in V2V network

Kim, J., Han, Y., & Kim, I. Efficient groupcast schemes for vehicle platooning in V2V network. IEEE Access 2019; 7, 171333-171345

2019
[22]

R., Varma, V

Gonçalves, T. R., Varma, V. S., & Elayoubi, S. E. Relay-assisted platooning in wireless networks: A joint communication and control approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2023; 72(6), 7810-7826. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/TVT.2023.3239801

work page doi:10.1109/tvt.2023.3239801 2023
[23]

Towards ensuring reliability of vehicular ad hoc networks using a relay selection techniques and D2D communications in 5G networks

Goli-Bidgoli, S., & Movahhedinia, N. Towards ensuring reliability of vehicular ad hoc networks using a relay selection techniques and D2D communications in 5G networks. Wireless Personal Communications 2020; 114(3), 2755-2767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07501-0

work page doi:10.1007/s11277-020-07501-0 2020
[24]

Chai, G., Wu, W., Yang, Q., & Yu, F. R. Data-driven resource allocation and group formation for platoon in V2X networks with CSI uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Communications 2023; 71(12), 7117-7132. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2023.3311455

work page doi:10.1109/tcomm.2023.3311455 2023
[25]

Fehrenbach, L

T. Fehrenbach, L. O. O. Abrego, C. Hellge, T. Schierl, J. Ott, 3GPP NR V2X Mode 2d: analysis of distributed scheduling for groupcast using ns- 3 5G LENA simulator, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.09708, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[26]

T.-W. Kim, S. Lee, D.-H. Lee, K.-J. Park, Priority-driven resource allocation with reuse for platooning in 5G vehicular network, Sustainability 17 (4) (2025) 1747, https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041747

work page doi:10.3390/su17041747 2025
[27]

3GPP, Evolved universal terrestrial radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical layer procedures, 2021, TS 36.213 V16.4.0

2021