arxiv: 2604.23506 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-26 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.other

Recognition: unknown

Ultrafast spectroscopy and role of interlayer coupling in high harmonic generation from layered solids

Eyal Uzner , Ofer Neufeld

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 05:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.other

keywords high-harmonic generationinterlayer couplinglayered solidshexagonal boron nitridegraphitetungsten disulfideperturbation theoryultrafast electron dynamics

0 comments

The pith

Interlayer coupling alters high-harmonic generation angular and ellipticity dependence in layered solids even for in-plane laser polarization.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a theory for high-harmonic generation that includes interlayer hopping in materials such as hexagonal boron nitride, graphite, and WS2. It shows that this coupling, often ignored when the driving laser lies in the plane, can visibly reshape emitted harmonic yields and their dependence on angle or ellipticity once the coupling is strong enough. An analytic expansion of the laser-driven current in powers of the coupling parameter yields an exact fourth-order polynomial dependence for the harmonic intensities. Numerical calculations on the three materials confirm the polynomial form. The result opens a route to use HHG spectra as a direct probe of interlayer strength and to treat that strength as a tunable control knob for attosecond emission.

Core claim

In layered solids the laser-driven current can be expanded perturbatively in the interlayer coupling strength. This expansion produces HHG yields that scale exactly as the fourth power of the coupling parameter. When the coupling reaches intensities typical of real van der Waals stacks, the angular distribution and ellipticity dependence of the emitted harmonics deviate from the purely in-plane predictions, even though the driving field remains polarized within the layers. The same fourth-order scaling holds for hBN, graphite, and WS2.

What carries the argument

Perturbative expansion of the laser-driven intraband and interband currents in the interlayer hopping parameter, which isolates the fourth-order term that governs the modification of HHG observables.

If this is right

HHG spectra become a practical all-optical readout of interlayer hopping strength in van der Waals stacks.
Mechanical strain or stacking-order changes can be used to modulate HHG yield and attosecond pulse shape.
Angular and polarization selection rules for solid HHG must be revised once out-of-plane hopping is included.
The same perturbative framework can be applied to other layered or heterostructure systems where interlayer effects were previously neglected.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Varying layer separation in a single device while recording HHG could map the coupling strength continuously and test the fourth-order law directly.
The approach may generalize to twisted bilayers or moiré systems in which interlayer coupling is spatially modulated.
If electron correlations beyond the single-particle models matter, the polynomial scaling would break at high fields and offer a diagnostic for correlation strength.

Load-bearing premise

The interlayer coupling must be weak enough for a perturbative series in its strength to converge rapidly, yet strong enough to produce measurable changes in HHG, while the chosen tight-binding models for hBN, graphite, and WS2 contain all relevant electron dynamics.

What would settle it

Measure the scaling of a specific harmonic intensity versus interlayer distance (controlled by hydrostatic pressure or uniaxial strain) in one of the three materials; any clear departure from a fourth-power law would falsify the perturbative prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23506 by Eyal Uzner, Ofer Neufeld.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a–b) Illustration of lattice geometry showing view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: Orientation dependence of normalized harmonic yields from layered solids for various interlayer coupling view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Ellipticity dependence of normalized harmonic yields from layered solids for varying interlayer coupling view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Harmonic yield dependence on the interlayer hopping parameter up to 100 meV in the perturbative regime. view at source ↗

read the original abstract

High harmonic generation (HHG) in solids has recently emerged as a powerful all-optical approach for probing material properties and ultrafast electron dynamics in quantum systems. It has been widely applied for studying two-dimensional and layered solids of various kinds. In these studies, the laser is usually polarized within the layered planes, where most electron dynamics occurs, while out-of-plane hopping is commonly neglected. This is despite of interlayer hopping being ubiquitous in nano-systems. Here we develop theory for HHG in layered solids in presence of interlayer coupling and employ it for studying strong-field driven hexagonal BN, graphite, and the transition metal dichalcogenide WS$_2$. We show that sufficiently intense couplings can alter typical HHG emission characteristics such as angular or ellipticity dependence even when the driving laser is polarized in-plane. We develop an analytic perturbation theory for the laser-driven current expanded in the interlayer coupling parameter and explicitly show that HHG yields follow a 4'th order polynomial form, which is validated numerically. Our work should motivate experiments for probing interlayer coupling via HHG spectroscopy, as well as exploring its modulation as a control parameter for ultrafast dynamics and attopulse generation via laser driving and mechanical strain.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives an explicit fourth-order polynomial for HHG yields from perturbative expansion in interlayer coupling and validates it numerically on hBN, graphite, and WS2, but leaves the practical validity window for the truncation unclear.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that they expand the laser-driven current in layered solids as a power series in the interlayer hopping strength and show that the resulting HHG intensities take a clean fourth-order polynomial form in that parameter. They then check this against direct numerics for hexagonal BN, graphite, and WS2, and point out that even in-plane polarized drives can pick up changes in angular or ellipticity dependence once the coupling is strong enough. That explicit polynomial and the numerical match are the concrete new pieces; earlier HHG work on these materials usually set the out-of-plane term to zero, so the derivation fills a straightforward gap. The analytic step is standard perturbation theory but executed cleanly enough to give a usable expression rather than just a qualitative statement. The numerics on the three materials make the claim testable instead of purely formal. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress-test flagged: the paper does not supply a radius-of-convergence estimate or a quantitative window showing when the fourth-order truncation remains accurate while still producing observable shifts. Without that, it is difficult to judge how far the result travels into real experimental regimes where couplings are neither tiny nor dominant. The material models are the usual tight-binding ones, which is fine for a first pass but leaves room for later checks against correlations or lattice dynamics. This is useful reading for people who already work on strong-field optics in van der Waals stacks and want an analytic handle on interlayer effects. It is not a broad breakthrough, but the combination of closed-form result plus numerical confirmation is solid enough to warrant referee time. I would send it for review with a request to add bounds or breakdown tests on the perturbation.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops a theory for high-harmonic generation (HHG) in layered solids that includes interlayer coupling, applied to hBN, graphite, and WS2. It presents an analytic perturbative expansion of the laser-driven current in the interlayer hopping parameter λ, showing that HHG yields follow a fourth-order polynomial in λ. This is numerically validated, and the work claims that sufficiently strong interlayer coupling can modify typical HHG features such as angular and ellipticity dependence even for in-plane polarized driving lasers, motivating HHG as a probe of interlayer effects and their control via strain.

Significance. If the perturbative expansion holds in an accessible regime, the analytic polynomial form offers a transparent way to connect interlayer coupling strength to observable HHG modifications, providing both a spectroscopic tool for layered materials and a potential control knob for ultrafast dynamics and attopulse generation. The numerical checks of the polynomial dependence add concrete support to the analytic insight.

major comments (1)

The analytic perturbation theory section: the expansion of the current in powers of the interlayer coupling λ is used to conclude that HHG yields follow a truncated fourth-order polynomial, which is then invoked to argue that 'sufficiently intense' couplings alter angular/ellipticity dependence. No radius-of-convergence estimate, scaling analysis, or numerical test of the truncation error is supplied. This is load-bearing, because the central claim requires a window in which the λ^4 term visibly modifies selection rules while higher-order terms remain negligible; without such bounds the existence of the claimed regime is unquantified.

minor comments (1)

The abstract and main text use '4'th order' with an apostrophe; standard mathematical English is 'fourth-order'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for providing constructive feedback. We respond to the major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional analysis as suggested.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The analytic perturbation theory section: the expansion of the current in powers of the interlayer coupling λ is used to conclude that HHG yields follow a truncated fourth-order polynomial, which is then invoked to argue that 'sufficiently intense' couplings alter angular/ellipticity dependence. No radius-of-convergence estimate, scaling analysis, or numerical test of the truncation error is supplied. This is load-bearing, because the central claim requires a window in which the λ^4 term visibly modifies selection rules while higher-order terms remain negligible; without such bounds the existence of the claimed regime is unquantified.

Authors: We appreciate the referee's observation regarding the need for bounds on the perturbative expansion. Although the manuscript includes numerical validation of the fourth-order polynomial dependence, we agree that a more explicit quantification of the truncation error and the relevant regime for 'sufficiently intense' coupling would strengthen the central claim. In the revised manuscript, we have added a scaling analysis of the higher-order terms in the expansion and numerical comparisons between the full calculation and the truncated polynomial for a range of λ values. These additions demonstrate a parameter window where the λ^4 term induces observable changes in HHG angular and ellipticity dependence, while the truncation error remains small, thereby supporting our conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Perturbative expansion in interlayer coupling yields independent analytic result with numerical validation

full rationale

The paper develops an analytic perturbation theory by expanding the laser-driven current in powers of the interlayer coupling parameter λ and derives that the resulting HHG yields take a fourth-order polynomial form in λ. This follows directly from the structure of the perturbative expansion of the current and its Fourier components without reducing to a fitted parameter or self-referential definition. Numerical validation is presented as an independent check rather than the source of the polynomial claim. No load-bearing step relies on self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work, or renaming of known results; the derivation remains self-contained against the stated assumptions of weak-to-moderate coupling.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Assessment is limited to the abstract; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are described. The approach relies on standard assumptions for layered solids.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Interlayer coupling can be treated as a perturbative parameter in the expansion of the laser-driven current.
The paper develops and applies perturbation theory expanded in the interlayer coupling parameter.
domain assumption The electron dynamics in hBN, graphite, and WS2 are adequately captured by models where in-plane motion dominates but interlayer hopping is present as a tunable parameter.
The theory is employed specifically for these layered solids.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5513 in / 1488 out tokens · 44782 ms · 2026-05-08T05:35:37.151263+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

[1]

Additional technical details are delegated to the Supplementary Information (SI)

Importantly, since the Hamiltonian is 4 × 4, there exists an analytic (though cumbersome) solution to its eigenstates, from which we derive analytic forms of dipole transition matrix elements, dmn and pnm, which are used in subsequent SBE simulations described below. Additional technical details are delegated to the Supplementary Information (SI). Using t...
[2]

Ghimire, G

S. Ghimire, G. Ndabashimiye, A. D. DiChiara, E. Sistrunk, M. I. Stockman, P. Agostini, L. F. DiMauro, and D. A. Reis, Strong-field and attosecond physics in solids, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Op- tical Physics 47, 204030 (2014)

2014
[3]

Ghimire and D

S. Ghimire and D. A. Reis, High-harmonic generation from solids, Nature Physics 15, 10 (2019)

2019
[4]

Yue and M

L. Yue and M. B. Gaarde, Introduction to theory of high- harmonic generation in solids: tutorial, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 39, 535 (2022)

2022
[5]

Schiffrin, T

A. Schiffrin, T. Paasch-Colberg, N. Karpowicz, V. Apalkov, D. Gerster, S. Mühlbrandt, M. Korb- man, J. Reichert, M. Schultze, S. Holzner, J. V. Barth, R. Kienberger, R. Ernstorfer, V. S. Yakovlev, M. I. Stockman, and F. Krausz, Optical-field-induced current in dielectrics, Nature 493, 70 (2013)

2013
[6]

Higuchi, C

T. Higuchi, C. Heide, K. Ullmann, H. B. Weber, and P. Hommelhoff, Light-field-driven currents in graphene, Nature 550, 224 (2017)

2017
[7]

Langer, Y.-P

F. Langer, Y.-P. Liu, Z. Ren, V. Flodgren, C. Guo, J. Vogelsang, S. Mikaelsson, I. Sytcevich, J. Ahrens, A. L’Huillier, C. L. Arnold, and A. Mikkelsen, Few-cycle lightwave-driven currents in a semiconductor at high rep- etition rate, Optica 7, 276 (2020)

2020
[8]

Hanus, V

V. Hanus, V. Csajbók, Z. Pápa, J. Budai, Z. Már- ton, G. Z. Kiss, P. Sándor, P. Paul, A. Szeghalmi, Z. Wang, B. Bergues, M. F. Kling, G. Molnár, J. Volk, and P. Dombi, Light-field-driven current control in solids with pJ-level laser pulses at 80 MHz repetition rate, Op- tica 8, 570 (2021)

2021
[9]

Fehér, V

B. Fehér, V. Hanus, W. Li, Z. Pápa, J. Budai, P. Paul, A. Szeghalmi, Z. Wang, M. F. Kling, and P. Dombi, Light field–controlled PHz currents in intrinsic metals, Science Advances 11, eadv5406 (2026)

2026
[10]

Vampa, T

G. Vampa, T. J. Hammond, N. Thiré, B. E. Schmidt, F. Légaré, C. R. McDonald, T. Brabec, D. D. Klug, and P. B. Corkum, All-Optical Reconstruction of Crys- tal Band Structure, Physical Review Letters115, 193603 (2015)

2015
[11]

A. A. Lanin, E. A. Stepanov, A. B. Fedotov, and A. M. Zheltikov, Mapping the electron band structure by intra- band high-harmonic generation in solids, Optica 4, 516 (2017)

2017
[12]

T. T. Luu, Z. Yin, A. Jain, T. Gaumnitz, Y. Pertot, J. Ma, and H. J. Wörner, Extreme–ultraviolet high– harmonic generation in liquids, Nature Communications 9, 3723 (2018)

2018
[13]

Y.-Y. Lv, J. Xu, S. Han, C. Zhang, Y. Han, J. Zhou, S.-H. Yao, X.-P. Liu, M.-H. Lu, H. Weng, Z. Xie, Y. B. Chen, J. Hu, Y.-F. Chen, and S. Zhu, High-harmonic generation in Weyl semimetal β-WP2 crystals, Nature Communications 12, 6437 (2021)

2021
[14]

A. J. Uzan-Narovlansky, L. Faeyrman, G. G. Brown, S. Shames, V. Narovlansky, J. Xiao, T. Arusi-Parpar, O. Kneller, B. D. Bruner, O. Smirnova, R. E. F. Silva, B. Yan, Á. Jiménez-Galán, M. Ivanov, and N. Dudovich, Observation of interband Berry phase in laser-driven crystals, Nature 626, 66 (2024)

2024
[15]

Bauer and K

D. Bauer and K. K. Hansen, High-Harmonic Gener- ation in Solids with and without Topological Edge States, Physical Review Letters 120, 177401 (2018), arXiv:1711.05783

work page arXiv 2018
[16]

R. E. F. Silva, Á. Jiménez-Galán, B. Amorim, O. Smirnova, and M. Ivanov, Topological strong-field physics on sub-laser-cycle timescale, Nature Photonics 13, 849 (2019)

2019
[17]

Chacón, D

A. Chacón, D. Kim, W. Zhu, S. P. Kelly, A. Dauphin, E. Pisanty, A. S. Maxwell, A. Picón, M. F. Ciappina, D. E. Kim, C. Ticknor, A. Saxena, and M. Lewenstein, Circular dichroism in higher-order harmonic generation: Heralding topological phases and transitions in Chern in- sulators, Physical Review B 102, 134115 (2020)

2020
[18]

Y. Bai, F. Fei, S. Wang, N. Li, X. Li, F. Song, R. Li, Z. Xu, and P. Liu, High-harmonic generation from topo- logical surface states, Nature Physics 17, 311 (2021)

2021
[19]

C. P. Schmid, L. Weigl, P. Grössing, V. Junk, C. Gorini, S. Schlauderer, S. Ito, M. Meierhofer, N. Hofmann, D. Afanasiev, J. Crewse, K. A. Kokh, O. E. Tereshchenko, J. Güdde, F. Evers, J. Wilhelm, K. Richter, U. Höfer, and R. Huber, Tunable non-integer high-harmonic generation in a topological insulator, Na- ture 593, 385 (2021)

2021
[20]

Baykusheva, A

D. Baykusheva, A. Chacón, J. Lu, T. P. Bailey, J. A. Sobota, H. Soifer, P. S. Kirchmann, C. Rotundu, C. Uher, T. F. Heinz, D. A. Reis, and S. Ghimire, All- Optical Probe of Three-Dimensional Topological Insula- 8 tors Based on High-Harmonic Generation by Circularly Polarized Laser Fields, Nano Letters 21, 8970 (2021)

2021
[21]

Heide, Y

C. Heide, Y. Kobayashi, D. R. Baykusheva, D. Jain, J. A. Sobota, M. Hashimoto, P. S. Kirchmann, S. Oh, T. F. Heinz, D. A. Reis, and S. Ghimire, Probing topo- logical phase transitions using high-harmonic generation, Nature Photonics 16, 620 (2022)

2022
[22]

Neufeld, N

O. Neufeld, N. Tancogne-Dejean, H. Hübener, U. De Gio- vannini, and A. Rubio, Are there universal signatures of topological phases in high-harmonic generation? proba- bly not., Phys. Rev. X 13, 031011 (2023)

2023
[23]

Z. Chen, C. Granados, I. Nisim, D. Kroeger, O. Neufeld, M. F. Ciappina, and M. Krüger, All-optical mapping of ultrafast carrier dynamics in a Dirac semimetal, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.24290 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

M. R. Bionta, E. Haddad, A. Leblanc, V. Gruson, P. Las- sonde, H. Ibrahim, J. Chaillou, N. Émond, M. R. Otto, . Jiménez-Galán, R. E. F. Silva, M. Ivanov, B. J. Si- wick, M. Chaker, and F. Légaré, Tracking ultrafast solid- state dynamics using high harmonic spectroscopy, Phys- ical Review Research 3, 023250 (2021)

2021
[25]

Neufeld, J

O. Neufeld, J. Zhang, U. De Giovannini, H. Hübener, and A. Rubio, Probing phonon dynamics with multi- dimensional high harmonic carrier-envelope-phase spec- troscopy, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences 119, e2204219119 (2022)

2022
[26]

Rana and G

N. Rana and G. Dixit, Probing phonon-driven symme- try alterations in graphene via high-order-harmonic spec- troscopy, Phys. Rev. A 106, 053116 (2022)

2022
[27]

Zhang, O

J. Zhang, O. Neufeld, N. Tancogne-Dejean, I.-T. Lu, H. Hübener, U. De Giovannini, and A. Rubio, En- hanced high harmonic eﬀiciency through phonon-assisted photodoping effect, npj Computational Materials10, 202 (2024)

2024
[28]

Zhang, Z

J. Zhang, Z. Wang, F. Lengers, D. Wigger, D. E. Reiter, T. Kuhn, H. J. Wörner, and T. T. Luu, High-harmonic spectroscopy probes lattice dynamics, Nature Photonics 18, 792 (2024)

2024
[29]

Jiménez-Galán, R

. Jiménez-Galán, R. E. F. Silva, O. Smirnova, and M. Ivanov, Lightwave control of topological properties in 2D materials for sub-cycle and non-resonant valley ma- nipulation, Nature Photonics 14, 728 (2020)

2020
[30]

Mitra,

S. Mitra, . Jiménez-Galán, M. Aulich, M. Neuhaus, R. E. F. Silva, V. Pervak, M. F. Kling, and S. Biswas, Light-wave-controlled Haldane model in monolayer hexagonal boron nitride, Nature 628, 752 (2024)

2024
[31]

Tyulnev,

I. Tyulnev, . Jiménez-Galán, J. Poborska, L. Vamos, P. S. J. Russell, F. Tani, O. Smirnova, M. Ivanov, R. E. F. Silva, and J. Biegert, Valleytronics in bulk MoS2 with a topologic optical field, Nature 628, 746 (2024)

2024
[32]

Lively, S

K. Lively, S. A. Sato, G. Albareda, A. Rubio, and A. Kelly, Revealing ultrafast phonon mediated inter- valley scattering through transient absorption and high harmonic spectroscopies, Physical Review Research 6, 13069 (2024)

2024
[33]

H. Kim, J. Kim, A. Galler, M. Kim, A. Chacón, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Kim, S. Chae, M.-H. Jo, A. Rubio, O. Neufeld, and J.-W. Kim, Quantum interfer- ence and occupation control in high harmonic generation from monolayer ws 2, Nature Communications 16, 9825 (2025)

2025
[34]

Weitz, D

T. Weitz, D. Lesko, S. Wittigschlager, W. Li, C. Heide, O. Neufeld, and P. Hommelhoff, Lightwave-driven elec- trons in a Floquet topological insulator, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.17917 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[35]

Galler, A

A. Galler, A. Rubio, and O. Neufeld, Mapping light- dressed Floquet bands by highly nonlinear optical excita- tions and valley polarization, Journal of Physical Chem- istry Letters 14, 11298 (2023)

2023
[36]

Heide, T

C. Heide, T. Eckstein, T. Boolakee, C. Gerner, H. B. Weber, I. Franco, and P. Hommelhoff, Electronic Coher- ence and Coherent Dephasing in the Optical Control of Electrons in Graphene, Nano Letters 21, 9403 (2021)

2021
[37]

Galler and O

A. Galler and O. Neufeld, Bulk photogalvanic current control and gap spectroscopy in 2D hexagonal materials, Journal of Materials Chemistry C 13, 17893 (2025)

2025
[38]

Neufeld, N

O. Neufeld, N. Tancogne-Dejean, U. De Giovannini, H. Hübener, and A. Rubio, Light-Driven Extremely Non- linear Bulk Photogalvanic Currents, Physical Review Letters 127, 126601 (2021)

2021
[39]

Sharma, P

S. Sharma, P. Elliott, and S. Shallcross, Valley control by linearly polarized laser pulses: example of WSe2, Optica 9, 947 (2022)

2022
[40]

Sharma, P

S. Sharma, P. Elliott, and S. Shallcross, THz induced giant spin and valley currents, Science Advances 9, eadf3673 (2023)

2023
[41]

Bharti and G

A. Bharti and G. Dixit, Photocurrent generation in solids via linearly polarized laser, Physical Review B 109, 104309 (2024)

2024
[42]

Lesko, T

D. Lesko, T. Weitz, S. Wittigschlager, S. Nöcker, W. Li, P. Hommelhoff, and O. Neufeld, Tailored-light photocur- rent spectroscopy for probing time-reversal symmetry- broken phases, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.05768 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

Kanega and M

M. Kanega and M. Sato, Two-color laser control of pho- tocurrent and high harmonics in graphene, Physical Re- view B 112, 45306 (2025)

2025
[44]

M. S. Mrudul, . Jiménez-Galán, M. Ivanov, and G. Dixit, Light-induced valleytronics in pristine graphene, Optica 8, 422 (2021)

2021
[45]

Neufeld, D

O. Neufeld, D. Podolsky, and O. Cohen, Floquet group theory and its application to selection rules in harmonic generation, Nature Communications 10, 405 (2019)

2019
[46]

Habibović, K

D. Habibović, K. R. Hamilton, O. Neufeld, and L. Rego, Emerging tailored light sources for studying chirality and symmetry, Nature Reviews Physics 6, 663– (2024)

2024
[47]

Tancogne-Dejean, M

N. Tancogne-Dejean, M. J. T. Oliveira, X. Andrade, H. Appel, C. H. Borca, G. Le Breton, F. Buchholz, A. Castro, S. Corni, A. A. Correa, U. De Giovannini, A. Delgado, F. G. Eich, J. Flick, G. Gil, A. Gomez, N. Helbig, H. Hübener, R. Jestädt, J. Jornet-Somoza, A. H. Larsen, I. V. Lebedeva, M. Lüders, M. A. L. Mar- ques, S. T. Ohlmann, S. Pipolo, M. Rampp, C...

2020
[48]

Chang Lee, L

V. Chang Lee, L. Yue, M. B. Gaarde, Y.-h. Chan, and D. Y. Qiu, Many-body enhancement of high-harmonic generation in monolayer MoS2, Nature Communications 15, 6228 (2024)

2024
[49]

Golde, T

D. Golde, T. Meier, and S. W. Koch, High harmonics generated in semiconductor nanostructures by the cou- pled dynamics of optical inter- and intraband excitations, Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 77, 1 (2008)

2008
[50]

Le Breton, A

G. Le Breton, A. Rubio, and N. Tancogne-Dejean, High- harmonic generation from few-layer hexagonal boron ni- 9 tride: Evolution from monolayer to bulk response, Phys- ical Review B 98, 165308 (2018)

2018
[51]

M. S. Mrudul and G. Dixit, High-harmonic generation from monolayer and bilayer graphene, Physical Review B 103, 94308 (2021)

2021
[52]

Y. Lee, D. Kim, D.-E. Kim, and A. Chacón, High Har- monic Generation in Monolayer and Bilayer of Transition Metal Dichalcogenide (2021)

2021
[53]

D. Kim, Y. Lee, A. Chacón, and D.-E. Kim, Effect of Interlayer Coupling and Symmetry on High-Order Har- monic Generation from Monolayer and Bilayer Hexago- nal Boron Nitride (2022)

2022
[54]

E. B. Molinero, A. Datta, M. J. Calderón, E. Bascones, and R. E. F. Silva, High-harmonic generation with a twist: all-optical characterization of magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Optica 11, 171 (2024)

2024
[55]

Alcalà, U

J. Alcalà, U. Bhattacharya, J. Biegert, M. Ciappina, U. Elu, T. Graß, P. T. Grochowski, M. Lewenstein, A. Palau, T. P. H. Sidiropoulos, T. Steinle, and I. Tyul- nev, High-harmonic spectroscopy of quantum phase tran- sitions in a high-Tc superconductor, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2207766119 (2022)

2022
[56]

Tyulnev, L

I. Tyulnev, L. Zhang, L. Vamos, J. Poborska, U. Bhat- tacharya, R. W. Chhajlany, T. Grass, S. Mañas-Valero, E. Coronado, M. Lewenstein, and J. Biegert, High har- monic spectroscopy reveals anisotropy of the charge- density-wave phase transition in TiSe2, Communications Materials 6, 152 (2025)

2025
[57]

S. Liu, O. Cohen, O. Neufeld, and P. Chen, Laser- Driven Structural Transformation from a Bulk Crystal to a Layered Material, Physical Review Letters 136, 86902 (2026)

2026
[58]

S. M. Gilbert, T. Pham, M. Dogan, S. Oh, B. Shevitski, G. Schumm, S. Liu, P. Ercius, S. Aloni, M. L. Cohen, and A. Zettl, Alternative stacking sequences in hexagonal boron nitride, 2D Materials 6, 21006 (2019)

2019
[59]

C. Su, E. Janzen, M. He, C. Li, A. Zettl, J. D. Cald- well, J. H. Edgar, and I. Aharonovich, Fundamentals and emerging optical applications of hexagonal boron nitride: a tutorial, Advances in Optics and Photonics 16, 229 (2024)

2024
[60]

Heide, Y

C. Heide, Y. Kobayashi, A. C. Johnson, T. F. Heinz, D. A. Reis, F. Liu, and S. Ghimire, High-harmonic gener- ation from artificially stacked 2D crystals, Nanophotonics 12, 255 (2023)

2023
[61]

Korolev, T

V. Korolev, T. Lettau, V. Krishna, A. Croy, M. Zuerch, C. Spielmann, M. Waechtler, U. Peschel, S. Graefe, and G. Soavi, Unveiling the Role of Electron-Phonon Scatter- ing in Dephasing High-Order Harmonics in Solids, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12929 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[62]

Y. Kim, M. J. Kim, S. Cha, S. Choi, C.-J. Kim, B. J. Kim, M.-H. Jo, J. Kim, and J. Lee, Dephasing Dynamics Accessed by High Harmonic Generation: Determination of Electron–Hole Decoherence of Dirac Fermions, Nano Letters 24, 1277 (2024)

2024
[63]

T. G. Pedersen, K. Pedersen, and T. Brun Kriestensen, Optical matrix elements in tight-binding calculations, Physical Review B 63, 201101 (2001)

2001
[64]

Neufeld and O

O. Neufeld and O. Cohen, Background-free measurement of ring currents by symmetry-breaking high-harmonic spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 103202 (2019)

2019
[65]

Y. Su, Y. Wei, C. Lin, L. Huang, J. Le, C.-x. Shan, A. H. Kung, C. Tian, and Y. R. Shen, Gapless tunable intense terahertz pulse generation in strained diamond, Light: Science & Applications 15, 186 (2026)

2026
[66]

Yoshikawa, T

N. Yoshikawa, T. Tamaya, and K. Tanaka, High- harmonic generation in graphene enhanced by elliptically polarized light excitation, Science (New York, N.Y.)356, 736 (2017)

2017
[67]

Möller, Y

M. Möller, Y. Cheng, S. D. Khan, B. Zhao, K. Zhao, M. Chini, G. G. Paulus, and Z. Chang, Dependence of high-order-harmonic-generation yield on driving-laser el- lipticity, Phys. Rev. A 86, 011401 (2012)

2012