pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.23920 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 🧮 math.AP · math.DG

Survey on topological methods for Allen--Cahn equations and systems

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 02:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP math.DG
keywords allen--cahnisoperimetricsurveysystemsboundarycaseclustersgeometric
0
0 comments X

The pith

The survey organizes topological methods for counting solutions to Allen-Cahn equations and systems, connecting them to minimal hypersurfaces and multi-phase isoperimetric problems via Gamma-convergence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The Allen-Cahn equation is a PDE whose solutions can approximate minimal surfaces or soap-bubble clusters when a small parameter goes to zero. The survey explains how a technique called the photography method builds approximate solutions near chosen points on a manifold and then uses topology to prove there must be many distinct solutions. It covers both scalar equations, which relate to single minimal surfaces, and vector-valued systems, which relate to clusters of several phases. The authors compare results on closed manifolds versus manifolds with boundary, noting how boundary conditions change the geometry. They also point out where the method works well and where it runs into trouble, especially when classifying all possible isoperimetric clusters is still incomplete.

Core claim

The photography method, a variational-topological approach based on localized approximate solutions and barycenter maps, enables one to encode the topology of the ambient manifold into multiplicity results for Allen-Cahn problems.

Load-bearing premise

That the cited literature on Gamma-convergence and isoperimetric theory provides a complete enough foundation for the surveyed multiplicity results, particularly in the vectorial case where full classification of clusters is lacking.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23920 by Jo\~ao Henrique Andrade, Raon\'i Ponciano, Stefano Nardulli.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Phase transition, where {u = −1} indicates the material is entirely in Phase A, while {u = 1} corresponds to the material being fully in Phase B. While the specific choice of the values ±1 is a convenient normalization, the presence of a double-well structure arises naturally from thermodynamically consistent models. In general terms, a double-well potential is any C 2 function W that has exactly two local… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Graphic representation of Wlog with T = 3 and Tc = 4. Assuming T = 3 and Tc = 4, and neglecting higher-order terms and adding a constant to simplify the expression (without affecting the dynamics), we obtain the widely used regularized double-well potential: Wreg(s) = 1 4 (1 − s 2 ) 2 . (2) This regular potential Wreg, represented in view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Graphic representation of Wreg = 1 4 (1 − s 2 ) 2 Another fundamental equation used to model phase transitions is the Cahn–Hilliard equation: ∂u ∂t = div µ(u)∇(ε −1W′ (u) − ε∆u) view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A schematic representation of a multi-well potential in the vectorial setting, illustrated here in the case of three phases, with noncollinear minima corresponding to different pure states. While the scalar Allen–Cahn equation just discussed captures the emergence of interfaces between two pure phases, it is natural to ask whether the same framework can be extended to describe systems with more than two co… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An interface following the mean curvature flow. For the purpose of this survey, we focus on the time-independent case of the Allen–Cahn equation (ACN,ε,Ω) since it plays a fundamental role in the study of minimal surfaces. Indeed, stationary solutions of Eq. (t-ACN,ε,Ω) give rise to interfaces with zero mean curvature (that is, minimal surfaces). Moreover, due to the properties of the recovery sequences in… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a survey on multiplicity results for the Allen--Cahn equation and systems in the singular perturbation regime, emphasizing their geometric interpretation through $\Gamma$-convergence and isoperimetric theory. In the scalar case, the Allen--Cahn functional converges to perimeter, giving rise to minimal and constant-mean-curvature hypersurfaces, while vectorial Allen--Cahn systems lead to multi-phase isoperimetric clusters. The main methodological tool discussed is the photography method, a variational-topological approach based on localized approximate solutions and barycenter maps, which enables one to encode the topology of the ambient manifold into multiplicity results. We compare problems posed on closed manifolds with those on manifolds with boundary, describing the distinct geometric effects induced by Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions. The survey highlights both the effectiveness and the limitations of this framework, particularly in the vectorial case, where the lack of a full classification of isoperimetric clusters creates fundamental analytical challenges.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The survey rests entirely on prior literature for all theorems and methods; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors themselves.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5466 in / 1043 out tokens · 37897 ms · 2026-05-08T02:25:26.343758+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

128 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abels, H

    H. Abels, H. Garcke, and G. Gr¨ un, Thermodynamically Consistent, Frame Indifferent Diffuse Interface Models for Incompressible Two-Phase Flows with Different Densities.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences22(2012), p. 1150013.url:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202511500138(Cited on page 2)

  2. [2]

    The existence and nonexistence of global solutions for a semilinear heat equation on graphs

    S. Alarc´ on, J. Petean, and C. Rey, Multiplicity results for constant Q-curvature conformal metrics.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations63.6 (2024), Paper No. 146.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526- 024-02762-0(Cited on page 18)

  3. [3]

    Variational models for phase transitions, an approach via Γ-convergence

    G. Alberti, “Variational models for phase transitions, an approach via Γ-convergence”.Calculus of variations and partial differential equations (Pisa, 1996). Springer, Berlin, 2000, pp. 95–114.url:https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57186-2_3(Cited on page 15)

  4. [5]

    F. J. Almgren Jr., Existence and regularity almost everywhere of solutions to elliptic variational problems with constraints.Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.4.165 (1976), pp. viii+199.url:https://doi.org/10.1090/ memo/0165(Cited on pages 13, 14, 22)

  5. [6]

    Ambrosio and A

    L. Ambrosio and A. Braides, Functionals defined on partitions in sets of finite perimeter. II. Semicontinuity, relaxation and homogenization.J. Math. Pures Appl. (9)69.3 (1990), pp. 307–333 (Cited on page 13). 26 REFERENCES

  6. [7]

    D. M. Anderson, G. B. McFadden, and A. A. Wheeler, Diffuse-interface methods in fluid mechanics. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics30(1998), pp. 139–165.url:https : / / www . annualreviews . org / content/journals/10.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.139(Cited on page 2)

  7. [8]

    J. H. Andrade, J. Conrado, S. Nardulli, P. Piccione, and R. Resende, Multiplicity of solutions to the multiphasic Allen-Cahn-Hilliard system with a small volume constraint on closed parallelizable manifolds. J. Funct. Anal.286(2024), Paper No. 110345, 61.url:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2024.110345 (Cited on pages 11, 13, 15, 21, 22)

  8. [9]

    J. H. Andrade, D. Corona, S. Nardulli, P. Piccione, and R. Ponciano,From bubbles to clusters: Multiple solutions to the Allen–Cahn system. 2024.url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17026(Cited on pages 11, 15, 22, 23)

  9. [10]

    Antonelli, S

    G. Antonelli, S. Nardulli, and M. Pozzetta, The isoperimetric problemviadirect method in noncompact metric measure spaces with lower Ricci bounds.ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var.28(2022), Paper No. 57, 32.url:https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2022052(Cited on page 21)

  10. [11]

    Badalassi, H

    V. Badalassi, H. Ceniceros, and S. Banerjee, Computation of multiphase systems with phase field models. Journal of Computational Physics190(2003), pp. 371–397.url:https : / / www . sciencedirect . com / science/article/pii/S0021999103002808(Cited on page 2)

  11. [12]

    Baldo, Minimal interface criterion for phase transitions in mixtures of Cahn-Hilliard fluids.Ann

    S. Baldo, Minimal interface criterion for phase transitions in mixtures of Cahn-Hilliard fluids.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire7(1990), pp. 67–90.url:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0294-1449(16) 30304-3(Cited on pages 15, 21)

  12. [13]

    Barles, H

    G. Barles, H. M. Soner, and P. E. Souganidis, Front propagation and phase field theory.SIAM J. Control Optim.31.2 (1993), pp. 439–469.url:https://doi.org/10.1137/0331021(Cited on page 6)

  13. [14]

    In: Computer Vision – ECCV 2018

    S. Bartels,Numerical methods for nonlinear partial differential equations. Vol. 47. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics. Springer, Cham, 2015, pp. x+393.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-13797-1(Cited on page 4)

  14. [15]

    Introduction to Morse theory: a new approach

    V. Benci, “Introduction to Morse theory: a new approach”.Topological nonlinear analysis. Vol. 15. Progr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA, 1995, pp. 37–177 (Cited on page 18)

  15. [16]

    Benci and G

    V. Benci and G. Cerami, The effect of the domain topology on the number of positive solutions of nonlinear elliptic problems.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.114.1 (1991), pp. 79–93.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF00375686(Cited on page 18)

  16. [17]

    Benci and G

    V. Benci and G. Cerami, Multiple positive solutions of some elliptic problems via the Morse theory and the domain topology.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations2(1994), pp. 29–48.url:https : //doi.org/10.1007/BF01234314(Cited on page 18)

  17. [18]

    Lusternik-Schnirelman and Morse theory for the van der Waals-Cahn-Hilliard equation with volume constraint

    V. Benci, D. Corona, S. Nardulli, L. E. Osorio, and P. Piccione, Corrigendum to: “Lusternik-Schnirelman and Morse theory for the van der Waals-Cahn-Hilliard equation with volume constraint” [Nonlinear Anal. 220 (2022) 112851].Nonlinear Anal.238(2024), Paper No. 113389, 9.url:https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.na.2023.113389(Cited on pages 10, 19, 20)

  18. [19]

    Benci, S

    V. Benci, S. Nardulli, L. E. O. Acevedo, and P. Piccione, Lusternik-Schnirelman and Morse theory for the van der Waals–Cahn–Hilliard equation with volume constraint.Nonlinear Anal.220(2022), Paper No. 112851, 29.url:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2022.112851(Cited on pages 10, 15, 19, 20)

  19. [20]

    Benci, S

    V. Benci, S. Nardulli, and P. Piccione, Multiple solutions for the van der Waals–Allen–Cahn–Hilliard equation with a volume constraint.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations59.2 (2020), Paper No. 64, 30.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-020-1724-8(Cited on pages 18, 20)

  20. [21]

    Beneˇ s, V

    M. Beneˇ s, V. Chalupeck´ y, and K. Mikula, Geometrical image segmentation by the Allen–Cahn equation. Applied Numerical Mathematics51(2004), pp. 187–205.url:https : / / www . sciencedirect . com / science/article/pii/S0168927404000819(Cited on page 2)

  21. [22]

    Bertacco, Stochastic Allen-Cahn equation with logarithmic potential.Nonlinear Anal.202(2021), Paper No

    F. Bertacco, Stochastic Allen-Cahn equation with logarithmic potential.Nonlinear Anal.202(2021), Paper No. 112122, 22.url:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2020.112122(Cited on page 3)

  22. [23]

    Bertozzi, S

    A. Bertozzi, S. Esedoglu, and A. Gillette, Analysis of a Two-Scale Cahn–Hilliard Model for Binary Image Inpainting.Multiscale Modeling & Simulation6(2007), pp. 913–936.url:https://doi.org/10.1137/ 060660631(Cited on page 2)

  23. [24]

    A. L. Bertozzi, S. Esedoglu, and A. Gillette, Inpainting of Binary Images Using the Cahn–Hilliard Equation.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing16(2007), pp. 285–291 (Cited on page 2)

  24. [25]

    Bonforte, F

    M. Bonforte, F. Maggi, and D. Restrepo,Asymptotic behavior of a diffused interface volume-preserving mean curvature flow. 2024.url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18868(Cited on page 25)

  25. [26]

    Chapter 2 A handbook of Γ-convergence

    A. Braides, “Chapter 2 A handbook of Γ-convergence”. Ed. by M. Chipot and P. Quittner. Vol. 3. Handbook of Differential Equations: Stationary Partial Differential Equations. North-Holland, 2006, REFERENCES 27 pp. 101–213.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874573306800069(Cited on page 14)

  26. [27]

    Hashin, S

    L. Bronsard and R. V. Kohn, Motion by mean curvature as the singular limit of Ginzburg-Landau dynamics.J. Differential Equations90.2 (1991), pp. 211–237.url:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022- 0396(91)90147-2(Cited on page 6)

  27. [28]

    Caffarelli, J.-M

    L. Caffarelli, J.-M. Roquejoffre, and O. Savin, Nonlocal minimal surfaces.Comm. Pure Appl. Math.63.9 (2010), pp. 1111–1144.url:https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.20331(Cited on page 24)

  28. [29]

    J. W. Cahn, On spinodal decomposition.Acta Metallurgica9(1961), pp. 795–801.url:https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0001616061901821(Cited on page 2)

  29. [30]

    J. W. Cahn and J. E. Hilliard, Free Energy of a Nonuniform System. I. Interfacial Free Energy.The Journal of Chemical Physics28(Feb. 1958), pp. 258–267.url:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1744102 (Cited on pages 2, 3)

  30. [31]

    J. W. Cahn and J. E. Hilliard, Free Energy of a Nonuniform System. III. Nucleation in a Two-Component Incompressible Fluid.The Journal of Chemical Physics31(Sept. 1959), pp. 688–699.url:https://doi. org/10.1063/1.1730447(Cited on page 2)

  31. [32]

    Caponio and D

    E. Caponio and D. Corona, A variational setting for an indefinite Lagrangian with an affine Noether charge.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations62.2 (2023), Paper No. 39, 33.url:https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00526-022-02379-1(Cited on page 16)

  32. [33]

    Caponio, D

    E. Caponio, D. Corona, R. Giamb` o, and P. Piccione, Fixed energy solutions to the Euler-Lagrange equations of an indefinite Lagrangian with affine Noether charge.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4)203.4 (2024), pp. 1819–1850.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10231-024-01424-4(Cited on page 16)

  33. [34]

    Caselli, E

    M. Caselli, E. Florit-Simon, and J. Serra,Yau’s conjecture for nonlocal minimal surfaces. arXiv:2306.07100 [math.DG]. 2024.url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07100(Cited on pages 7, 24)

  34. [35]

    Chan and J

    H. Chan and J. Wei, On De Giorgi’s conjecture: recent progress and open problems.Sci. China Math. 61.11 (2018), pp. 1925–1946.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-017-9307-4(Cited on page 7)

  35. [36]

    Chen, Generation and propagation of interfaces for reaction-diffusion equations.J

    X. Chen, Generation and propagation of interfaces for reaction-diffusion equations.J. Differential Equations96.1 (1992), pp. 116–141.url:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(92)90146-E(Cited on page 6)

  36. [37]

    Y. G. Chen, Y. Giga, and S. Goto, Uniqueness and existence of viscosity solutions of generalized mean curvature flow equations.J. Differential Geom.33.3 (1991), pp. 749–786.url:http://projecteuclid. org/euclid.jdg/1214446564(Cited on page 6)

  37. [38]

    Cingolani and M

    S. Cingolani and M. Lazzo, Multiple semiclassical standing waves for a class of nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations.Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal.10.1 (1997), pp. 1–13.url:https://doi.org/10.12775/ TMNA.1997.019(Cited on page 18)

  38. [39]

    Cingolani and M

    S. Cingolani and M. Lazzo, Multiple positive solutions to nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with competing potential functions.J. Differential Equations160.1 (2000), pp. 118–138.url:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1006/jdeq.1999.3662(Cited on page 18)

  39. [40]

    Colombo and F

    M. Colombo and F. Maggi, Existence and almost everywhere regularity of isoperimetric clusters for fractional perimeters.Nonlinear Anal.153(2017), pp. 243–274.url:https : / / doi. org / 10 . 1016 /j . na.2016.09.019(Cited on page 24)

  40. [41]

    Cornea, G

    O. Cornea, G. Lupton, J. Oprea, and D. Tanr´ e,Lusternik–Schnirelmann Category. Vol. 103. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2003 (Cited on page 16)

  41. [42]

    Corona, S

    D. Corona, S. Nardulli, R. Oliver-Bonafoux, G. Orlandi, and P. Piccione, Multiplicity results for mass constrained Allen-Cahn equations on Riemannian manifolds with boundary.Math. Ann.392.3 (2025), pp. 3479–3524.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-025-03178-7(Cited on pages 10, 20, 21)

  42. [43]

    Corona, A multiplicity result for Euler-Lagrange orbits satisfying the conormal boundary conditions

    D. Corona, A multiplicity result for Euler-Lagrange orbits satisfying the conormal boundary conditions. J. Fixed Point Theory Appl.22.3 (2020), Paper No. 60, 32.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11784- 020-00795-4(Cited on page 16)

  43. [44]

    Corona, A multiplicity result for orthogonal geodesic chords in Finsler disks.Discrete Contin

    D. Corona, A multiplicity result for orthogonal geodesic chords in Finsler disks.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.41.11 (2021), pp. 5329–5357.url:https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2021079(Cited on page 16)

  44. [45]

    Corona and F

    D. Corona and F. Giannoni, Brake orbits for Hamiltonian systems of the classical type via geodesics in singular Finsler metrics.Adv. Nonlinear Anal.11.1 (2022), pp. 1223–1248.url:https://doi.org/10. 1515/anona-2022-0222(Cited on page 16)

  45. [46]

    Corona, S

    D. Corona, S. Nardulli, R. Oliver-Bonafoux, and G. Orlandi,Multiplicity of solutions for Gross-Pitaevskii equations on Riemannian manifolds. 2025.url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21349(Cited on page 25). 28 REFERENCES

  46. [47]

    Dal Maso, I

    G. Dal Maso, I. Fonseca, and G. Leoni, Asymptotic analysis of second order nonlocal Cahn-Hilliard-type functionals.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.370.4 (2018), pp. 2785–2823.url:https://doi.org/10.1090/ tran/7151(Cited on page 6)

  47. [48]

    De Giorgi and T

    E. De Giorgi and T. Franzoni, Su un tipo di convergenza variazionale.Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat. (8)58.6 (1975), pp. 842–850 (Cited on page 14)

  48. [49]

    Dey, A comparison of the Almgren-Pitts and the Allen-Cahn min-max theory.Geom

    A. Dey, A comparison of the Almgren-Pitts and the Allen-Cahn min-max theory.Geom. Funct. Anal. 32.5 (2022), pp. 980–1040.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00039-022-00610-x(Cited on page 8)

  49. [50]

    Dey, Existence of multiple closed CMC hypersurfaces with small mean curvature.J

    A. Dey, Existence of multiple closed CMC hypersurfaces with small mean curvature.J. Differential Geom. 125.2 (2023), pp. 379–403.url:https://doi.org/10.4310/jdg/1696432925(Cited on page 7)

  50. [51]

    Röst, Neimark–Sacker bifurcation for periodic delay differential equations, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 60 (2005), pp

    G. Di Matteo and A. Malchiodi, Double bubbles with high constant mean curvatures in Riemannian manifolds.Nonlinear Anal.224(2022), Paper No. 113088, 41.url:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na. 2022.113088(Cited on page 7)

  51. [52]

    Emmerich,The Diffuse Interface Approach in Materials Science: Thermodynamic Concepts and Applications of Phase-Field Models

    H. Emmerich,The Diffuse Interface Approach in Materials Science: Thermodynamic Concepts and Applications of Phase-Field Models. Vol. 73. Lecture Notes in Physics Monographs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003.url:https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/3-540-36409-9(Cited on page 4)

  52. [53]

    L. C. Evans, H. M. Soner, and P. E. Souganidis, Phase transitions and generalized motion by mean curvature.Comm. Pure Appl. Math.45.9 (1992), pp. 1097–1123.url:https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa. 3160450903(Cited on page 6)

  53. [54]

    M. M. Fall, Area-minimizing regions with small volume in Riemannian manifolds with boundary.Pacific J. Math.244.2 (2010), pp. 235–260.url:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 2140 / pjm . 2010 . 244 . 235(Cited on page 21)

  54. [55]

    Feng and Y

    X. Feng and Y. Li, Analysis of symmetric interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin methods for the Allen–Cahn equation and the mean curvature flow.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis35(Dec. 2014), pp. 1622–1651.url:https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/dru058(Cited on page 2)

  55. [56]

    Feng and A

    X. Feng and A. Prohl, Numerical analysis of the Allen-Cahn equation and approximation for mean curvature flows.Numerische Mathematik94(2003), pp. 33–65.url:https://www.scopus.com/inward/ record . uri ? eid = 2 - s2 . 0 - 0142087018 & doi = 10 . 1007 % 2fs00211 - 002 - 0413 - 1 & partnerID = 40 & md5 = 3107526b2fda7de0d0e98ebd5667930a(Cited on page 2)

  56. [57]

    G. M. Figueiredo and S. M. A. Salirrosas, Multiple solutions to a Kirchhoff-Boussinesq type problem with competing potentials.Minimax Theory Appl.10.1 (2025), pp. 135–163 (Cited on page 18)

  57. [58]

    Fonseca and S

    I. Fonseca and S. M¨ uller, A uniqueness proof for the Wulff theorem.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 119.1-2 (1991), pp. 125–136.url:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210500028365(Cited on page 15)

  58. [59]

    Garcke, K

    H. Garcke, K. F. Lam, E. Sitka, and V. Styles, A Cahn–Hilliard–Darcy model for tumour growth with chemotaxis and active transport.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences26(2016), pp. 1095–1148.url:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202516500263(Cited on page 2)

  59. [60]

    Gaspar and M

    P. Gaspar and M. A. M. Guaraco, The Weyl law for the phase transition spectrum and density of limit interfaces.Geom. Funct. Anal.29.2 (2019), pp. 382–410.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00039-019- 00489-1(Cited on page 8)

  60. [61]

    Ghimenti and A

    M. Ghimenti and A. M. Micheletti, Non degeneracy for solutions of singularly perturbed nonlinear elliptic problems on symmetric Riemannian manifolds.Commun. Pure Appl. Anal.12.2 (2013), pp. 679–693.url: https://doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.679(Cited on page 11)

  61. [62]

    Giacomin and J

    G. Giacomin and J. L. Lebowitz, Phase segregation dynamics in particle systems with long range interactions. I. Macroscopic limits.J. Statist. Phys.87.1-2 (1997), pp. 37–61.url:https://doi.org/10. 1007/BF02181479(Cited on page 6)

  62. [63]

    Giacomin and J

    G. Giacomin and J. L. Lebowitz, Phase segregation dynamics in particle systems with long range interactions. II. Interface motion.SIAM J. Appl. Math.58.6 (1998), pp. 1707–1729.url:https : / / doi.org/10.1137/S0036139996313046(Cited on page 6)

  63. [64]

    Giamb` o, F

    R. Giamb` o, F. Giannoni, and P. Piccione, Multiple brake orbits inm-dimensional disks.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations54.3 (2015), pp. 2553–2580.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-015-0875-5 (Cited on page 16)

  64. [65]

    M. A. M. Guaraco, Min-max for phase transitions and the existence of embedded minimal hypersurfaces. J. Differential Geom.108.1 (2018), pp. 91–133.url:https://doi.org/10.4310/jdg/1513998031(Cited on page 8)

  65. [66]

    M. E. Gurtin, D. Polignone, and J. Vi˜ nals, Two-phase binary fluids and immiscible fluids described by an order parameter.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences06(1996), pp. 815–831.url: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202596000341(Cited on page 2). REFERENCES 29

  66. [67]

    Henry,Perturbation of the boundary in boundary-value problems of partial differential equations

    D. Henry,Perturbation of the boundary in boundary-value problems of partial differential equations. Vol. 318. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. With editorial assistance from Jack Hale and Antˆ onio Luiz Pereira. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005, pp. viii+206.url:https : //doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546730(Cited on page 11)

  67. [68]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena.Rev. Mod. Phys.49(3 July 1977), pp. 435–479.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.49.435(Cited on page 2)

  68. [69]

    Ilmanen, Convergence of the Allen-Cahn equation to Brakke’s motion by mean curvature.J

    T. Ilmanen, Convergence of the Allen-Cahn equation to Brakke’s motion by mean curvature.J. Differential Geom.38.2 (1993), pp. 417–461.url:http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jdg/1214454300(Cited on page 6)

  69. [70]

    Jacqmin, Contact-line dynamics of a diffuse fluid interface.Journal of Fluid Mechanics402(2000), pp

    D. Jacqmin, Contact-line dynamics of a diffuse fluid interface.Journal of Fluid Mechanics402(2000), pp. 57–88 (Cited on page 2)

  70. [71]

    Jeong, J

    D. Jeong, J. Shin, Y. Li, Y. Choi, J.-H. Jung, S. Lee, and J. Kim, Numerical analysis of energy-minimizing wavelengths of equilibrium states for diblock copolymers.Current Applied Physics14(2014), pp. 1263– 1272.url:https : / / www . sciencedirect . com / science / article / pii / S1567173914001849(Cited on page 2)

  71. [72]

    Katsoulakis, G

    M. Katsoulakis, G. T. Kossioris, and F. Reitich, Generalized motion by mean curvature with Neumann conditions and the Allen-Cahn model for phase transitions.J. Geom. Anal.5.2 (1995), pp. 255–279.url: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02921677(Cited on page 6)

  72. [73]

    Khain and L

    E. Khain and L. M. Sander, Generalized Cahn-Hilliard equation for biological applications.Phys. Rev. E 77(5 May 2008), p. 051129.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.77.051129(Cited on page 2)

  73. [74]

    J. Kim, S. Lee, Y. Choi, S.-M. Lee, and D. Jeong, Basic Principles and Practical Applications of the Cahn–Hilliard Equation.Mathematical Problems in Engineering2016(2016), p. 9532608.url:https: //onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1155/2016/9532608(Cited on page 2)

  74. [75]

    R. V. Kohn and P. Sternberg, Local minimisers and singular perturbations.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A111.1-2 (1989), pp. 69–84.url:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1017 / S0308210500025026(Cited on page 14)

  75. [76]

    Kotschote and R

    M. Kotschote and R. Zacher, Strong solutions in the dynamical theory of compressible fluid mixtures. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences25(2015), pp. 1217–1256 (Cited on page 2)

  76. [77]

    K. F. Lam and H. Wu, Thermodynamically consistent Navier–Stokes–Cahn–Hilliard models with mass transfer and chemotaxis.European Journal of Applied Mathematics29(2018), pp. 595–644 (Cited on page 2)

  77. [78]

    Lee and J

    D. Lee and J. Kim, Mean curvature flow by the Allen-Cahn equation.European Journal of Applied Mathematics26(2015), pp. 535–559.url:https : / / www . scopus . com / inward / record . uri ? eid = 2 - s2 . 0 - 84932198313 & doi = 10 . 1017 % 2fS0956792515000200 & partnerID = 40 & md5 = b991e902816c6207113c958bd8bca523(Cited on page 2)

  78. [79]

    G. P. Leonardi, Infiltrations in immiscible fluids systems.Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics131.2 (2001), pp. 425–436 (Cited on pages 13, 14)

  79. [80]

    Y. Li, M. Liao, R. Chen, and J. Shen, Diatom-based inference of variations in the strength of East Asian spring wind speeds since mid-Holocene.Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology418(2015), pp. 65–74.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018214005677(Cited on page 2)

  80. [81]

    Li, J.-I

    Y. Li, J.-I. Choi, and J. Kim, A phase-field fluid modeling and computation with interfacial profile correction term.Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation30(2016), pp. 84– 100.url:https : / / www . sciencedirect . com / science / article / pii / S1007570415002130(Cited on page 2)

Showing first 80 references.