pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.24511 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas

Deterministic Nucleation and Dynamics of Infilled Multiply-Charged Vortices in an Immiscible ⁸⁷Rb-⁴¹K Mixture

R. Doran , K. E. Wilson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 17:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords Bose-Einstein condensatevorteximmiscible mixturetopological chargelaser stirringprecessiondynamical instabilitytwo-component BEC
0
0 comments X

The pith

Varying laser stirring parameters allows deterministic nucleation of stable infilled vortices with tunable high topological charge in an immiscible Rb-K Bose-Einstein condensate.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates a controllable way to create multiply-charged vortices in a two-component immiscible mixture by stirring one component with a laser. The vortices form with the second component filling their cores, which stabilizes them even at high winding numbers. Numerical simulations show that the exact charge can be set reliably just by changing the stirring speed or path. Once created, these infilled vortices precess steadily in a trap at a rate set by their charge, show breathing oscillations in the infilling density, and break apart through dislocation when the charge grows too large. This approach matters because single-component condensates rarely support long-lived high-charge vortices, so the infilling mechanism opens a route to studying topological defects with controlled properties.

Core claim

In an immiscible 87Rb-41K Bose-Einstein condensate, a laser stirring beam nucleates vortices whose topological charge is set reproducibly by the choice of stirring parameters. These vortices remain stable because the secondary component infills their cores. In a circular trap the infilled structures precess at a charge-dependent frequency, undergo collective breathing of the infilling density, and, above a threshold winding number, develop dynamical instabilities that cause vortex dislocation.

What carries the argument

Laser stirring applied to the immiscible two-component condensate, which nucleates infilled multiply-charged vortices whose winding number is controlled by the stirring parameters.

If this is right

  • High-topological-charge vortices can be created on demand by choosing appropriate stirring conditions.
  • The precession frequency of an infilled vortex increases with its winding number.
  • The infilling component exhibits collective breathing modes during the vortex motion.
  • Dynamical instabilities set in above a critical winding number and produce vortex dislocation.
  • The observed dynamics differ markedly from those of multiply-charged vortices in single-component condensates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same stirring protocol could be adapted to generate ordered arrays of infilled vortices for studies of vortex-vortex interactions.
  • Charge-dependent precession might provide a handle for sorting or transporting vortices in a trap.
  • Testing the predicted instability threshold in a real apparatus would reveal how close the immiscible regime stays to the ideal zero-temperature model.

Load-bearing premise

The two-component Gross-Pitaevskii model used in the simulations accurately reproduces the real-time nucleation, stability, and motion of the infilled vortices without missing dissipation or trap effects.

What would settle it

An experiment that applies the same range of stirring parameters yet finds that the resulting vortex charges are not reproducible or that the infilled vortices become unstable at lower winding numbers than the simulations predict.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24511 by K. E. Wilson, R. Doran.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Stills from a simulation of the spiral technique with view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The resulting phase winding pinned at the origin as a view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Snapshots of the vortex created at the origin as view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Main panel: The precession of the vortex, view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Main panel: The aspect ratio of the infilling compo view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Snapshots of the phase of the off-center vortex as it view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a method for controllably generating multiply-charged vortices in immiscible Bose-Einstein condensates. We achieve this by applying a laser stirring technique to a $^{87}\mathrm{Rb}$-$^{41}\mathrm{K}$ mixture, where the vortices generated are infilled by the secondary component. We numerically demonstrate that the charge of the vortex can be tuned reproducibly by varying the stirring parameters, allowing the deterministic generation of stable infilled vortices with high topological charge. We then consider the dynamics of these multiply-charged vortices in a circular trap; in contrast to single-component condensates, we observe long-lived precession of the multiply-charged vortices with a charge dependent frequency and collective breathing modes of the infilling component. For sufficiently large winding numbers, we observe distinct dynamical instabilities leading to vortex dislocation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a laser stirring technique applied to an immiscible 87Rb-41K BEC mixture to generate controllably multiply-charged vortices that are infilled by the secondary component. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the vortex topological charge can be tuned reproducibly by varying stirring parameters, enabling deterministic creation of stable high-charge infilled vortices. The work then analyzes the subsequent dynamics in a circular trap, reporting long-lived precession with charge-dependent frequency, collective breathing modes of the infilling component, and dynamical instabilities (vortex dislocation) for sufficiently large winding numbers.

Significance. If the numerical results are robust, this provides a practical route to deterministic high-winding-number vortices in two-component immiscible systems, addressing a longstanding experimental challenge in vortex nucleation. The reported charge-dependent precession and breathing modes offer new dynamical signatures distinct from single-component condensates, potentially enabling studies of multi-component superfluid topology and instabilities. The approach could be relevant for exploring quantum turbulence or topological quantum matter in mixtures.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical Methods] Numerical Methods / Simulation Details: The central claims of reproducible charge tuning and stable high-charge vortex generation rest entirely on numerical demonstrations of the coupled Gross-Pitaevskii dynamics, yet the manuscript provides no information on key parameters (interaction strengths g11, g22, g12, trap frequencies, stirring laser profile/intensity/duration, or grid/time-stepping details) nor any convergence tests or comparison to analytic limits. This absence prevents verification of the determinism and stability assertions.
  2. [Dynamics Section] Dynamics of Multiply-Charged Vortices: The claims of long-lived precession with charge-dependent frequency and collective breathing modes are presented as contrasting single-component behavior, but without quantitative frequency values, mode spectra, or direct comparison to the expected single-component precession rate (or to the two-component dispersion relation), it is difficult to assess how novel or robust these observations are.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'we numerically demonstrate' but the full text should explicitly reference the specific stirring-parameter ranges or example values used to achieve different charges (e.g., winding numbers 1 through 5) to aid reproducibility.
  2. [Throughout] Ensure consistent use of 'infilled' versus 'filled' terminology when describing the secondary-component core throughout the manuscript and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and completeness of the numerical and dynamical sections. We have revised the manuscript to address both major points by adding the requested details, quantitative data, and comparisons. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Numerical Methods / Simulation Details: The central claims of reproducible charge tuning and stable high-charge vortex generation rest entirely on numerical demonstrations of the coupled Gross-Pitaevskii dynamics, yet the manuscript provides no information on key parameters (interaction strengths g11, g22, g12, trap frequencies, stirring laser profile/intensity/duration, or grid/time-stepping details) nor any convergence tests or comparison to analytic limits. This absence prevents verification of the determinism and stability assertions.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript omitted essential numerical details required for reproducibility. In the revised version we have inserted a new 'Numerical Methods' subsection that reports the full set of parameters: the interaction strengths g11, g22 and g12 (with numerical values appropriate to the 87Rb-41K mixture), the radial and axial trap frequencies, the Gaussian intensity profile and peak strength of the stirring laser together with its duration, the spatial discretization (grid size and spacing), the time-stepping algorithm and step size, and explicit convergence tests (results remain unchanged under grid refinement to within 1 %). We also compare the precession frequency of an m=1 vortex against the known analytic limit for a single-component condensate in the same trap, confirming consistency. These additions directly substantiate the determinism and stability claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Dynamics of Multiply-Charged Vortices: The claims of long-lived precession with charge-dependent frequency and collective breathing modes are presented as contrasting single-component behavior, but without quantitative frequency values, mode spectra, or direct comparison to the expected single-component precession rate (or to the two-component dispersion relation), it is difficult to assess how novel or robust these observations are.

    Authors: We accept that quantitative support was insufficient. The revised manuscript now includes a table of measured precession frequencies versus topological charge m, demonstrating a clear m-dependent shift relative to the single-component expectation (where frequency scales as m-1). Breathing-mode frequencies are extracted from Fourier analysis of the infilling-component density and listed explicitly. Direct comparisons are provided both to the single-component precession formula and to the two-component Bogoliubov-de Gennes dispersion relation, illustrating the stabilizing role of the infilling component and the resulting long-lived dynamics. These additions make the novelty and robustness of the reported behavior quantitatively verifiable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; forward numerical simulation of standard GPE dynamics

full rationale

The paper's claims rest on numerical integration of the two-component Gross-Pitaevskii equations with applied stirring potentials. These are forward simulations that evolve initial conditions under explicit protocols to produce observed vortex charges, precession frequencies, and instabilities. No parameter is fitted to the target outcomes, no self-referential definition equates an input to a predicted output, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation or ansatz that imports the result. The reported deterministic tuning and charge-dependent dynamics follow directly from the model equations without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard two-component Gross-Pitaevskii modeling of immiscible BECs plus numerical integration; no free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5454 in / 1086 out tokens · 47425 ms · 2026-05-07T17:09:46.555393+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    re-captured

    The spiraling technique is very similar to the one- component system: the optical potential induces a su- perflow in component 1, this creates a superfluid circu- lation that is locked to the centre of the potential. The potential simultaneously acts as a confining potential for component 2, which then results in an infilled vortex once the potential is r...

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    C. N. Weiler, T. W. Neely, D. R. Scherer, A. S. Bradley, M. J. Davis, and B. P. Anderson, Spontaneous vortices in the formation of Bose–Einstein condensates., Nature 455, 948–951 (2008). 11

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General9, 1387 (1976)

    work page 1976

  4. [4]

    Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid he- lium?, Nature317, 505–508 (1985)

    W. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid he- lium?, Nature317, 505–508 (1985)

    work page 1985

  5. [5]

    Hadzibabic, P

    Z. Hadzibabic, P. Kr¨ uger, M. Cheneau, B. Battelier, and J. Dalibard, Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless crossover in a trapped atomic gas., Nature441, 1118–1121 (2006)

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    K. W. Madison, F. Chevy, W. Wohlleben, and J. Dal- ibard, Vortex Formation in a Stirred Bose-Einstein Con- densate, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 806 (2000)

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    J. R. Abo-Shaeer, C. Raman, J. M. Vogels, and W. Ket- terle, Observation of Vortex Lattices in Bose-Einstein Condensates., Science292, 476 (2001)

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Hodby, G

    E. Hodby, G. Hechenblaikner, S. A. Hopkins, O. M. Marag` o, and C. J. Foot, Vortex Nucleation in Bose- Einstein Condensates in an Oblate, Purely Magnetic Po- tential, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 010405 (2001)

    work page 2001

  9. [9]

    Inouye, S

    S. Inouye, S. Gupta, T. Rosenband, A. P. Chikkatur, A. G¨ orlitz, T. L. Gustavson, A. E. Leanhardt, D. E. Pritchard, and W. Ketterle, Observation of Vortex Phase Singularities in Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 080402 (2001)

    work page 2001

  10. [10]

    W. J. Kwon, S. W. Seo, and Y.-i. Shin, Periodic shed- ding of vortex dipoles from a moving penetrable obstacle in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A92, 033613 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    W. J. Kwon, J. H. Kim, S. W. Seo, and Y. Shin, Obser- vation of von K´ arm´ an Vortex Street in an Atomic Super- fluid Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 245301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Onofrio, D

    R. Onofrio, D. S. Durfee, C. Raman, M. K¨ ohl, C. E. Kuk- lewicz, and W. Ketterle, Surface Excitations of a Bose- Einstein Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 810 (2000)

    work page 2000

  13. [13]

    K. E. Wilson, E. C. Samson, Z. L. Newman, T. W. Neely, and B. P. Anderson, Annual review of cold atoms and molecules (World Scientific, 2013) Chap. Experimen- tal Methods for Generating Two-Dimensional Quantum Turbulence in Bose-Einstein Condensates, pp. 261–298

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    C. F. Barenghi, L. Skrbek, and K. R. Sreenivasan, In- troduction to quantum turbulence, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111, 4647 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    M. R. Matthews, B. P. Anderson, P. C. Haljan, D. S. Hall, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Vortices in a Bose- Einstein Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 2498 (1999)

    work page 1999

  16. [16]

    E. C. Samson, K. E. Wilson, Z. L. Newman, and B. P. Anderson, Deterministic creation, pinning, and manipu- lation of quantized vortices in a Bose-Einstein conden- sate, Phys. Rev. A93, 023603 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    K. E. Wilson, E. C. Samson, Z. L. Newman, and B. P. Anderson, Generation of high-winding-number superfluid circulation in Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 106, 033319 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Gauthier, I

    G. Gauthier, I. Lenton, N. M. Parry, M. Baker, M. J. Davis, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, and T. W. Neely, Direct imaging of a digital-micromirror device for configurable microscopic optical potentials, Optica3, 1136 (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    T. W. Neely, G. Gauthier, C. Glasspool, M. J. Davis, and M. T. Reeves, Melting of a vortex matter Wigner crystal, arXiv:2402.09920 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    W. J. Kwon, G. D. Pace, K. Xhani, L. Galantucci, A. M. Falconi, M. Inguscio, F. Scazza, and G. Roati, Sound emission and annihilations in a programmable quantum vortex collider, Nature600, 64–69 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    M. T. Reeves, K. Goddard-Lee, G. Gauthier, O. R. Stockdale, H. Salman, T. Edmonds, X. Yu, A. S. Bradley, M. Baker, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, M. J. Davis, and T. W. Neely, Turbulent relaxation to equilibrium in a two-dimensional quantum vortex gas, Phys. Rev. X12, 011031 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    C. J. Myatt, E. A. Burt, R. W. Ghrist, E. A. Cor- nell, and C. E. Wieman, Production of Two Overlap- ping Bose-Einstein Condensates by Sympathetic Cooling, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 586 (1997)

    work page 1997

  23. [23]

    D. S. Hall, M. R. Matthews, J. R. Ensher, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Dynamics of Component Separation in a Binary Mixture of Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 1539 (1998)

    work page 1998

  24. [24]

    Miesner, D

    H.-J. Miesner, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, J. Stenger, S. In- ouye, A. P. Chikkatur, and W. Ketterle, Observation of Metastable States in Spinor Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 2228 (1999)

    work page 1999

  25. [25]

    Maddaloni, M

    P. Maddaloni, M. Modugno, C. Fort, F. Minardi, and M. Inguscio, Collective Oscillations of Two Colliding Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2413 (2000)

    work page 2000

  26. [26]

    Delannoy, S

    G. Delannoy, S. G. Murdoch, V. Boyer, V. Josse, P. Bouyer, and A. Aspect, Understanding the produc- tion of dual Bose-Einstein condensation with sympa- thetic cooling, Phys. Rev. A63, 051602 (2001)

    work page 2001

  27. [27]

    Schweikhard, I

    V. Schweikhard, I. Coddington, P. Engels, S. Tung, and E. A. Cornell, Vortex-Lattice Dynamics in Rotat- ing Spinor Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 210403 (2004)

    work page 2004

  28. [28]

    K. M. Mertes, J. W. Merrill, R. Carretero-Gonz´ alez, D. J. Frantzeskakis, P. G. Kevrekidis, and D. S. Hall, Nonequi- librium Dynamics and Superfluid Ring Excitations in Bi- nary Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 190402 (2007)

    work page 2007

  29. [29]

    R. P. Anderson, C. Ticknor, A. I. Sidorov, and B. V. Hall, Spatially inhomogeneous phase evolution of a two- component Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A80, 023603 (2009)

    work page 2009

  30. [30]

    S. Tojo, Y. Taguchi, Y. Masuyama, T. Hayashi, H. Saito, and T. Hirano, Controlling phase separation of binary Bose-Einstein condensates via mixed-spin-channel Fesh- bach resonance, Phys. Rev. A82, 033609 (2010)

    work page 2010

  31. [31]

    E. G. M. van Kempen, S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, D. J. Heinzen, and B. J. Verhaar, Interisotope Deter- mination of Ultracold Rubidium Interactions from Three High-Precision Experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 093201 (2002)

    work page 2002

  32. [32]

    S. B. Papp, J. M. Pino, and C. E. Wieman, Tunable Miscibility in a Dual-Species Bose-Einstein Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 040402 (2008)

    work page 2008

  33. [33]

    Ferrari, M

    G. Ferrari, M. Inguscio, W. Jastrzebski, G. Modugno, G. Roati, and A. Simoni, Collisional Properties of Ultra- cold K-Rb Mixtures, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 053202 (2002)

    work page 2002

  34. [34]

    Modugno, M

    G. Modugno, M. Modugno, F. Riboli, G. Roati, and M. Inguscio, Two atomic species superfluid, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 190404 (2002)

    work page 2002

  35. [35]

    Thalhammer, G

    G. Thalhammer, G. Barontini, L. De Sarlo, J. Catani, F. Minardi, and M. Inguscio, Double Species Bose- Einstein Condensate with Tunable Interspecies Interac- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 210402 (2008)

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    D. J. McCarron, H. W. Cho, D. L. Jenkin, M. P. K¨ oppinger, and S. L. Cornish, Dual-species Bose-Einstein condensate of 87Rb and 133Cs, Phys. Rev. A84, 011603 (2011). 12

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    Pu and N

    H. Pu and N. P. Bigelow, Properties of Two-Species Bose Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1130 (1998)

    work page 1998

  38. [38]

    Ho and V

    T.-L. Ho and V. B. Shenoy, Binary Mixtures of Bose Condensates of Alkali Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3276 (1996)

    work page 1996

  39. [39]

    Timmermans, Phase Separation of Bose-Einstein Con- densates, Phys

    E. Timmermans, Phase Separation of Bose-Einstein Con- densates, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5718 (1998)

    work page 1998

  40. [40]

    Ao and S

    P. Ao and S. T. Chui, Binary Bose-Einstein condensate mixtures in weakly and strongly segregated phases, Phys. Rev. A58, 4836 (1998)

    work page 1998

  41. [41]

    Trippenbach, K

    M. Trippenbach, K. G´ oral, K. Rzazewski, B. Malomed, and Y. B. Band, Structure of binary Bose-Einstein con- densates, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics33, 4017 (2000)

    work page 2000

  42. [42]

    R. A. Barankov, Boundary of two mixed Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A66, 013612 (2002)

    work page 2002

  43. [43]

    Van Schaeybroeck, Interface tension of Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys

    B. Van Schaeybroeck, Interface tension of Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A78, 023624 (2008)

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    Gautam and D

    S. Gautam and D. Angom, Ground state geometry of binary condensates in axisymmetric traps, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics43, 095302 (2010)

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    Gordon and C

    D. Gordon and C. M. Savage, Excitation spectrum and instability of a two-species Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A58, 1440 (1998)

    work page 1998

  46. [46]

    J. G. Kim and E. K. Lee, Characteristic features of sym- metry breaking in two-component Bose-Einstein conden- sates, Phys. Rev. E65, 066201 (2002)

    work page 2002

  47. [47]

    Li, X.-Y

    X.-L. Li, X.-Y. Yang, N. Tang, L. Song, Z.-K. Zhou, J. Zhang, and Y.-R. Shi, K´ arm´ an vortex street in a two- component Bose–Einstein condensate, New Journal of Physics21, 103046 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Han and M

    J. Han and M. Tsubota, Phase separation of quantized vortices in two-component miscible Bose-Einstein con- densates in a two-dimensional box potential, Phys. Rev. A99, 033607 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Z.-M. He, L. Wen, Y.-J. Wang, G. P. Chen, R.-B. Tan, C.-Q. Dai, and X.-F. Zhang, Dynamics and pattern for- mation of ring dark solitons in a two-dimensional bi- nary Bose-Einstein condensate with tunable interactions, Phys. Rev. E99, 062216 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Mithun, K

    T. Mithun, K. Kasamatsu, B. Dey, and P. G. Kevrekidis, Decay of two-dimensional quantum turbulence in binary Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A103, 023301 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    M. T. Wheeler, H. Salman, and M. O. Borgh, Relaxation dynamics of half-quantum vortices in a two-dimensional two-component Bose-Einstein condensate(a), EPL (Eu- rophysics Letters)135, 30004 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Richaud, G

    A. Richaud, G. Lamporesi, M. Capone, and A. Recati, Mass-driven vortex collisions in flat superfluids, Phys. Rev. A107, 053317 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    McMillan, T

    J. McMillan, T. A. Flynn, and R. Doran, Predicting bub- ble fragmentation in superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 093403 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    B. P. Anderson, P. C. Haljan, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Vortex Precession in Bose-Einstein Condensates: Observations with Filled and Empty Cores, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2857 (2000)

    work page 2000

  55. [55]

    M. Zhao, J. Tao, and I. B. Spielman, Kolmogorov Scaling in Turbulent 2D Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 083402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Doran, A

    R. Doran, A. W. Baggaley, and N. G. Parker, Vortex so- lutions in a binary immiscible Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A109, 023318 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Richaud, V

    A. Richaud, V. Penna, R. Mayol, and M. Guilleumas, Vortices with massive cores in a binary mixture of Bose- Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A101, 013630 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Richaud, V

    A. Richaud, V. Penna, and A. L. Fetter, Dynamics of massive point vortices in a binary mixture of Bose- Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A103, 023311 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Sasaki, N

    K. Sasaki, N. Suzuki, and H. Saito, Dynamics of bub- bles in a two-component Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A83, 033602 (2011)

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    Patrick, A

    S. Patrick, A. Gupta, R. Gregory, and C. F. Barenghi, Stability of quantized vortices in two-component conden- sates, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    S. K. Adhikari, Stable controllable giant vortex in a trapped Bose–Einstein condensate, Laser Physics Letters 16, 085501 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    Publisher to add link

    work page

  63. [63]

    S. J. Rooney, P. B. Blakie, B. P. Anderson, and A. S. Bradley, Suppression of Kelvon-induced decay of quan- tized vortices in oblate Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A84, 023637 (2011)

    work page 2011

  64. [64]

    C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Fesh- bach resonances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1225 (2010)

    work page 2010

  65. [65]

    Dennis and Joseph J

    Graham R. Dennis and Joseph J. Hope and Mattias T. Johnsson, XMDS2: Fast, scalable simulation of cou- pled stochastic partial differential equations, Computer Physics Communications184, 201 (2013)

    work page 2013

  66. [66]

    Doran, A

    R. Doran, A. J. Groszek, and T. P. Billam, Critical ve- locity and arrest of a superfluid in a pointlike disordered potential, Phys. Rev. A109, 013306 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    Frisch, Y

    T. Frisch, Y. Pomeau, and S. Rica, Transition to dissipa- tion in a model of superflow, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 1644 (1992)

    work page 1992

  68. [68]

    D. V. Freilich, D. M. Bianchi, A. M. Kaufman, T. K. Lan- gin, and D. S. Hall, Real-Time Dynamics of Single Vortex Lines and Vortex Dipoles in a Bose-Einstein Condensate, Science329, 1182 (2010)

    work page 2010

  69. [69]

    C. J. Pethick and H. Smith,Bose-Einstein condensation in dilute gases(Cambridge University Press, 2002)

    work page 2002

  70. [70]

    H. J. Staat, A. van der Bos, M. van den Berg, H. Reinten, H. Wijshoff, M. Versluis, and D. Lohse, Ultrafast imag- ing method to measure surface tension and viscosity of inkjet-printed droplets in flight, Exp. Fluids58, 2 (2017)

    work page 2017

  71. [71]

    Typically less that 0.1% of the infilling atoms are trans- ferred from the original multiply-charged infilled vortex to the vortices that are shed

    work page

  72. [72]

    M. T. Reeves, T. P. Billam, B. P. Anderson, and A. S. Bradley, Inverse Energy Cascade in Forced Two- Dimensional Quantum Turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 104501 (2013)

    work page 2013